According to my Philosophy of Balance if is not stopped wurst (for mass slaughter, i.e. mass murdering and cooking especially of animals) machine causing huge unnecessary death and pain, so on the ground of revenge for this huge death and pain some disaster (e.g . nuclear war) finishes the world. By my personal experience this wurst machine is impossible to stop in contemporary situation of human society. Question is, whether in the above - mentioned situation the nuclear war appears as the most real way. (possibility bet as deborot, i.e. bees and also as Devil, i.e. as much more than the least possible death and pain) According to me stopping the above mentioned wurst machine is possible only through scientific revolution, nuclear war, advent of savior or through gradual development in very long time, in which everything it is necessary always to hope until the end. Only one next thing, in what the human perhaps can hope, is his or her still causing the least death and pain and that therefore this merciful human will escape revenge for by people caused huge unnecessary death and pain. (possibility alef as alohim, i.e. the God as the least possible death and pain) Despite I am mild optimist.

In final result in case of each idea it is always most important the decision of subordination to charity (i.e. causing the least possible death and pain) or contrary to not-charity (i.e. causing much more than the least possible death and pain), i.e. if the world is governed by charity (i.e. causing the least possible or a little more than the least possible death and pain) or by this not-charity or by these charity and not-charity in same extents.