3rd Part
Philosophy of
Balance
3rd Part
Philosophy of
Balance
1st Introduction-Paradise in our world
Our real
needs are related to the fact, that we are more or less energetic
living creatures, energetic living creatures (with more movement,
kinetic energy) have bigger real needs, the less energetic living
creatures have lower real needs. The aim is, that in the Universe there
was minimized total force of collisions between neighboring more
energic individuals, and less vigorous individuals, virtually inanimate
nature, this is going in the right allocation of the world values
(kinetic and potential kinetic energy, movement), which either combines
motion (kinetic energy differences, momentum) of neighboring
individuals and inanimate nature, or which in Universe increases the
overall strength of collisions among them. However, knowledge of the
greatest continuity of motion (kinetic energy differences, momentum) of
all adjacent living creatures and inanimate nature through the right
allocation of the Universe values (kinetic and potential kinetic
energy, motion) it is a matter so complex, as it is knowing the whole
reality, the Being, i.e. omniscience, i.e. knowledge of movement
(kinetic and potential kinetic energy) of every living creature and
inanimate nature and harmony among them. Values of the world, i.e.
object to our needs, it is greater or smaller part of the living
creatures and inanimate nature. Any opinion on the greatest continuity
of motion (kinetic energy differences, momentum) of all adjacent living
creatures and inanimate nature through the right allocation of the
Universe (kinetic and potential kinetic energy, motion) cannot cover it
in its entirety, by the words it cannot be fully described. Thoughts
and feelings of every living creature are imperfect picture, afterglow
(the world of experiance) of all the reality (the real world, all
energy, motion-kinetic energy and potential movement-potential
kinetic energy), the truth contained in the mind, the soul of every
living creature cannot completely cover the whole reality, that this
image is never exactly the same with reality. The challenge for all
living creatures is at everyday life in any relationship to all living
creatures and inanimate nature, to reconcile all these different images
of reality in an only one overall picture that best describes a reality
and it allows the greatest possible continuity of motion (kinetic
energy differences, momentum) of all living creatures and inanimate
nature by the right allocation of the Universe values (kinetic and
potential kinetic energy, motion).
How do I get to
paradise? In my opinion it is not necessary to look for
paradise after death, in my opinion it is humanly possible to
make paradise on Earth, in Universe or in our world. Precondition is that
all the creatures recognized
other
creatures as their
neighbors to work with no war, no killing, no stealing, to work
together for the full mastery of inanimate nature. In other words,
paradise on Earth is not unworldly power of God, but it is in our joint
power of all creatures. It is necessary really to pull in, which means,
that in a very perfect state in paradise we will not attack each other, but we
will also work together in complete control of inanimate nature (we
will really pull in, not just free ride).
What is the
cause of all wars, attacks and conflicts of all creatures?
That is our needs, which forces us to dominate the greater part of the
world than at any particular moment we just master. A dispute over
values of the world, i.e.the object of our needs, which control living
creatures, and inanimate nature, this is the cause. With increasing
harnessing of the inanimate nature, the emergence of new and new
values
of world, we need to fight with others. With increasing harnessing of
the inanimate nature as well as our needs grow. But it is also growing
strength of our struggles, which we are not fighting with primitive
tools but still more efficient weapons. The perfect mastery of
inanimate nature is based on gradual reduction of number and forces of
collisions between the creatures and inanimate nature, in particular I
mean human creatures but also other living creatures. The reduction of
collisions between living creatures and inanimate nature, while
reducing their number, but it increases their strength, as
competing or eventually fighting ever larger groups of people
rather than individuals. The life of man and other creatures is
becoming increasingly mass issue.
Nature itself
compels us to meet the increasing level of our needs, to limit the
number of conflicts between creatures and to form ourselves into even
larger groups. Thus creating an ever larger group of people, in which
the number of mutual collisions
decreases, if they are based on agreement of all their
members, if it is not possible to reach this agreement, on the use of
force corresponding to the actual needs of individuals affected by
violence, that on their future agreement. Our real needs are related to
the fact, that we are more or less energetic living creatures,
energetic people have bigger real needs, the less energetic people have
lower real needs. The decrease in collisions and a large group of
creatures with improved harnessing inanimate nature, with superior
weapons, but with improved satisfaction of needs of its members it can
be in two basic ways: violence and the agreement. If creatures are
united through force that does not match the actual needs of
individuals affected by violence, there is a decrease in the number of
disputes but increase in their combined strength, not the individuals
but whole groups of individuals are killing. Unification through the
violence must be such as definitely to minimize the force of clashes
between more energic individuals with greater needs and less energetic
individuals with smaller needs, this is going in the right allocation
of the world values (energy, movement, see above), either it unifies
(balances) motion (differences of kinetic energy, vigor) of neighboring
individuals, virtually inanimate nature or it permanently increases
collisions between each other. Uniting the creatures under the
actual and free agreement of all its members, who best know their real
needs, this group receives the above benefits of the living creatures
in a large group, but also no increase in the strength of their
disputes. Benefits of groups follow from the expertise of individuals.
Gradual
unification can be likened to an area full of balls, which are always
expanding their movement (momentum, kinetic energy) at the expense of
potential (kinetic) energy and the balls are colliding with more power
or still moving that are not colliding, but only touching.
Collisions are then caused, that the balls with great movement (i.e.
large momentum, kinetic energy) and with their different
direction of movement are unseparated from balls with a small movement
(momentum, kinetic energy), therefore between them different
balls must be, that limits of movement of the various spheres are
continuous, i.e. to balance motion, kinetic energy differences of
neighboring spheres, not further to expand them. This increase in
motion (or momentum, kinetic energy) and, together with the continuous
overcoming chaos and gradual establishment of an orderly movement it
should be accompanied by the delicate work of stoker, who adds and
takes away the motion (kinetic energy, momentum) of balls constantly
referred to widening or shrinking chaos. These balls are in fact
particles, which are all phenomena in our world. This stoker is the
nature and evolution, virtually movement of micro particles in terms of
microscopic physics.
The soul
(psyche, thoughts, feelings) of every living creature is imperfect
image, the reflection of the world (different worlds of experiance by
the philosopher Kant, I.), the truth contained in the mind, the soul of
every living creature cannot completely cover the whole world, this
image is never entirely consistent with reality (the real world by the
philosopher Kant, I.). The challenge of living creatures is at everyday
life in any relationship to all living creatures and inanimate nature,
to reconcile all of these images (the world of experiance of all
individuals) in a single overall picture of reality (in a single world
of experiance) that best describes the reality (real world),
eliminating all conflicts of common mental pictures of reality of every
living creature, through their free and genuine agreement,
corresponding to their actual needs (see above). If this agreement may
not be possible, then the violence enforcement corresponding actual
needs (see above) of all living creatures affected by violence aimed at
achieving a future agreement between them, the condition is that the
violence definitely as much as possible reduces the overall strength of
collisions among all individuals and inanimate nature in the Universe.
Besides forcing the conscious
violence of individuals, there is coercion of violence
of unconscious objective reality (it is sort of normative power of
reality), which also reduces the overall strength of collisions in this reality, it increases its consistency.
Then we get the correct picture of reality, the nearest to the truth
(the real world), the closest to any real needs (see above) of all
living creatures. This is still truer picture of reality (the real
world) resulting from still more harmonic sharing ideas (soul, psyche,
different worlds of experiance) of all existing creatures with the
birth, the Resurrection (see below) of still new living creatures it
will enable us to act and feel (to show in the soul reality, the real
world) increasingly in line with reality (the real world),
still more sophisticated to control over inanimate nature, and to
eliminate the suffering in the world caused by inanimate nature, such
as natural disasters or other failure of dead and living reality. This
is only a gradual sharing of thoughts, feelings in a single soul of all
living creatures (in a single world of experiance), it is a perfect
good, which we are gradually closer (see below).
As to the
creatures that should live in a harmonious world without pain, aging
and death, or the world without collisions with other creatures and
inanimate nature, i.e. in the above mentioned heaven, they
should be all live and dead creatures that allows us to obtain the most
faithful picture of reality (the real world) as a necessary condition
for complete mastery of inanimate nature and the perfection of science
and it would not be difficult to revive from the information contained
in the genetic code of a single living creature, any existing living
creatures throughout history, a kind of resurrection dead. At the same
time it should not be so difficult to achieve eternal youth and redress
grievances, which, by us nature committed through our larger or
smaller disharmonic assumptions of behavior colliding with
other creatures and inanimate nature. At the same time the
psyché (the world of experiance) of all living creatures
should be related with perfect communication technology, where the
harmonic society of all living creatures will be able to read each
other thoughts and the single psyche, only soul of
all individuals will be also created,.
The
progressively better sharing of thoughts, feelings, soul, psyche (the
world of experiance) of all living and dead creatures (see below) and
progressively the improved sharing of your body (the real
world) with our partner or partners it is the preparation for life in
full compliance with all living and dead creatures and inanimate
nature, the completely perfection of the future science, when we seem
to exist in the form of a perfect known energy (the real world) that is
just kinetic energy, when all the potential (kinetic) energy of the
world is transformed into kinetic energy, in other words, all matter is
transformed into motion. This energy (the real world) is everything and
everyone, it is continuous, harmonic and united, its all movement and
stillness are continuous with all the other motion and stillness, it is
in my conception the God, it is indestructible by the law of
conservation of momentum and energy. In terms of current physical
creatures, we see this all pervasive power only as a surface, all
points of our space (the world of experiance) to fill everything as all
matter and the absolute vacuum or emptiness, they are continuous and
via neighboring space-time points the movement of a single point in
space-time is transmitted to all other existing points of space-time,
the space-time points do not collide together, the space does not crush
in principle, these points of the space-time only touch and thus
transmits motion between them and they fill the whole of our space.
There will be unification of the psyche, soul, thoughts, feelings (the
world of experiance) of all living creatures and its greatest possible
approach to the truest picture of reality (the real world, God
in my theory).
Our world is
characterized by continuous transformation of potential kinetic energy
to kinetic energy and vice versa, ultimately it is concerned the
radiation of matter in the form of light, virtually current of photons
with the speed of light and in contrast the photon absorption,
virtually the light in the matter and its conversion into matter. One
can assume, that living organism exists in a
visible form, which presents a potential kinetic energy, thus matter
and in an invisible form that is pure kinetic energy, or movement and
the stillness of space-time points, forever it will remain only this
invisible system of a living organism represented by the
movement and stillness of space-time points, net energy, community of
God in my concept. At the same time I suggest that between
the movement of intangible points of space-time and
tangible particles known to man, there is a movement of other
particles of low weight but of a non-zero mass created ultimately also
by the points of space-time, the shared
beings with a single soul, apparently living creatures formed after the
death from these particles of low mass unknown to man and by various
tangible bodies formed by tangible particles known to man.
If you ask me
after reading this philosophy, whether it is true, I will answer some
yes and some not. The truth can only indicate as to me the reality (the
real world) and lie that is not true, and every statement of fact
cannot cover it in its entirety, words (the world of
experiance) do not affect the reality as a whole, in other words, every
statement is partly as fact true, partly as a fact wrong, i.e.
partially lying. It can only be distinguished mostly true statement, it
is a statement, which is in fact (the real world) mostly happening
and statement that is largely untrue, that statement is in
fact (the real world) mostly not happening. We can say, that every man,
whether guilty or innocent, whether friend or enemy, he or she is in
his or her words and thoughts partly right and partly lying.
Truth is relative, absolute, however, in my opinion, is good. Goodness
is the shortest path to compliance for each and everything (the world
of experiance of all living creatures as well as its conformity to the
real world), the longer we go on the way towards this goal,
the less the compliance of each and everything increases, it is a less good and greater evil,
while in my opinion, the consistency of all is inevitable, in my view,
chaos must be overcome and to establish an orderly movement as to me it
is the normative power of reality (see above). Each of us determines
however, when this happens. However, the knowledge of good as the
shortest way for a full harmony of each and everything it is a matter
as complex as it is difficult to know all the facts of the Being (the
real world), i.e. omniscience, the knowledge of the actual needs of
every living creature and of their compliance (see above), there are
only certain rules, mostly true indicators to us during this trip, they
suggest, that we are going well or badly. If it is concerned the
true good that is the shortest path to compliance of each and
everything, only time will show, sometimes it may take tens or hundreds
of years, it may be an example of the reign of communism in the world
that lasted for more than 80 years. These indicators of goodness that
is the shortest way for a full harmony of each and everything,
I tried to capture in my Philosophy of Balance, and I'm not entitled to
the truth, just trying to find during my life journey the shortest path
to the perfect consistency of each and everything every living creature of the world should try
it. My philosophy will be never completed during my life journey, I
will continue to change and adapt it according to the situation in this
my life's journey as soon as possible to achieve consistency between
each and everything. Therefore, for example, it is not possible in
terms of someone, who does not know the current status and future
evolutionary development of intellect and psyche (soul) of a living
creature out of a man or their given species, to say in advance whether
it is good that the man today sacrificed his or her life for other
living creatures non-humans. However it is possible to say as to me
today, that with the ongoing evolution accelerated by the relationship
with other living more sophisticated creature, which is human, the
other living creatures will be inevitably in time the full right
members of our society.
Preface
The Philosophy
of Balance is based on the exact science. If I doubt radically
all being in the footsteps of the philosopher Rene Descartes, it
remains me to determine the strongest point, though it can also be
questioned, I consider the most certain truth. This foundation is the
adoption of an exact science and the reality as its object, which is
Being, which can be perceived by our senses. Exact science, which has
already proved its usefulness for human development, it is the surest
truth, we have. Being
perceived by our senses can be generally described as
relational supracocontracoagency.
This means all being is done, i.e. any
fact can be understood as a process that can be broken down by reason
on the processes that are characterized by certain properties arising
from their relationship to other processes in the reality. An
example of coagency
is
the atom, the chemical element or substance and the judicial process.
Being virtually the reality is happening as the folding and
degradation, thus as co- and
contra-agency, coagency as a
(also partial) whole of
agency, virtually process within the process of reality composed of
other processes, contraagency in contrast, a reverse process, which
leads to decomposition virtually destruction of complex (even
partial) processes of the whole process at the sub-units of
processes. Coagency an example is the formation, folding, atom, state,
the example of contraagency is the destruction, degradation, disease,
explosion, etc. Composition and decomposition is in equilibrium,
therefore, regards the composition and decomposition it is superior supraagency. Example of
supragency of contraagency of explosion and of
coagency of origin of a star is the Universe, birth and death
is a creature, person, etc. The nature of being as an agency implies,
that it can be divided into developmental level formation, performance and termination agency, which
arises from the law of cause and effect, each process has reasonably
the reason or cause of emergence, i.e. the formation, course of
performance and result that is termination, which also causes the
formation of another process of reality. Examples of the formation
agency of automobile accident is the increased speed, slippery roads,
oncoming vehicle, drink driving, an example of the performance agency
is spinning out, failing to control, overrunning in the opposite lane,
an example of the termination agency is collision of vehicles, causing
damage to vehicles, etc. and causing injury, or possibly death of
carried persons. From the nature of agency as co-and
contra-agency it follows the distinction on total and unit agency
that is a reality as the process or the overall agency and the smallest
in the process of reality as a single agency. Examples of total agency
there is Being and not Being together, the Universe and also in my
concept the God, the example of atom as unit has been done, now it can
be a proton and an electron, in my concept the unit agency is a
fictional process in reality, because each process is also divisible.
With this resolution it is directly linked the fact of supra, the same and sub-agency,
supraagency is the complex process consisted within the reality, which
includes sub-processes, subagencies, a process virtually identical with
another process of reality is the same agency. An example of
supraagency is atom, of subagency the electron, proton, etc.,
and then of supraagency a
trial
and of subagency the magistrates in
this process, an example of sameagencies may be different electron and
proton or an atom of the same element in the same condition. Total, single, co-, contra-supra-same-, sub,
formation, performance and termination agency
embodies,
according to the Philosophy of Balance, each existing fact.
Formation,
performance and termination agency concepts are chosen for the same
content of letters in the
Czech root of the word, they are the letters "N" and "K",
letters which are very similar to those, that occur in the root of the
word "something" and "nothing". These concepts I formulated originally
in English as "formation", which means the origin or creation,
"performance", which means execution and "termination", which means the
end, the root is also composed of the same letter "R" and "M“.
The Philosophy
of Balance follows the philosophy
of Confucius, which in its own learning
"about the center and extent" or "the golden middle"
anticipates supracoagency as a balance between good
and synthetic
coagency and evil and destructive contraagency. Next the Philosophy of
Balance follows philosophy of
Alfred North Whitehead according to
which the unit being called real existing moment is in the form of
emotion experienced as the whole being, its past, present and also the
future is intimated and preformed. According to Philosophy of Balance
in fact, there is only one happening, which only the human mind
divides. This unity is happening as supracoagency
relationship with every other agency. The emergence of every
happening is codetermined by formation, performance and termination of
all other processes and the disappearance of a happening at the same
time is the emergence of another act.
In the
development a Philosophy of Balance
represents
the synthesis between dialectic
of Hegel and Herbert Spencer's evolution.
Unlike Hegel, according to which the reconciliation of opposites is in
their synthesis, which are deleted, while maintaining
and elevating to a higher plane, they appear again in another
conflict of opposites, the Philosophy of Balance determines all the
contrariness as a contradiction of the composition evident in the
material world as synthesis and decomposition manifesting in the physical
world as a destruction and the reconciliation of
the total composition and degradation as final. In contrast to
the evolution of Herbert Spencer, who sees the creation or integration
as denial of disintegration, i.e. destruction, my philosophy provides a creative imperfect
(stage of performance agency) balance and a perfect (stage
of termination agency) balance. Imperfect balance is
the fight of good folding or unrestricted creation and evil
decomposition or destruction on the increasing levels of
cocontraagency, whether in the form of a complex integration of
multiple cocoagency or complex
disintegration
as multiple cocontraagency. Perfect
balance is the final settlement of
limited general good composition or creation and of a limited
total evil degradation or
destruction. The overall agency is also infinite, since the termination
of every agency is happening the emergence of another, the perfect
balance of integration and disintegration occurs in infinite time, i.e.
the dissolution of the infinite whole agency. According to the
Philosophy of Balance unlimited creating as unlimited struggle
against the destruction or the unlimited formation cause a devastating
response. Limited destruction is, on the contrary, compatible with a
limited formation in the balanced creative process.
In the field of
metaphysics Philosophy of Balance builds on pantheism of Baruch Spinoza, when
he identifies the God with the overall agency, which takes the form of
supracocontracoagency, a creative balance between a limited total
disintegration, destruction and reduced the overall folding, virtually
formation, Devil with a total contraagency that is evil and decay
virtually destruction, whether in the form of pure degradation as
contraagency or degradation of coagency as contracoagency and Christ
with a total coagency, a good and folding virtually formation, whether
in the form of pure coagency or degradation of contraagency as
contracontraagency. Pantheism is so a synthesis of idealism and
materialism. God within it has also the nature of the material.
Philosophy of Balance describes extrasensory happenings through the
concepts known from the world of sensorial perception.
In my view, the
basis of every philosophy is
psyche of author, from point of
view of my psychology is a Philosophy of Balance is the way to maximize
a long-term (not short) avoidance
of conflicts in life. This will
not lose but neither to defeat others, it represents from human
psychology view the great power, which, according to the Philosophy of
Balance promotes in the
relations between living creatures with their own power, virtually more
probably, without some special
fighting for this
accepted truth. You can talk about normative
force of reality. At the same time I
realize, that the Philosophy of Balance will be hardly accepted by all
people who have the possibility to create their own or to take a
different philosophy, reflecting the nature of the psyche it is also
genetic. In the short-term it will be rejected by
the people who want to win and to defeat other living creatures, or
those who want to be defeated and lose, virtually to sacrifice for
another, they prefer uncertainty.
In terms of exact sciences I
understand action, thus any event or fact, as the movement and stillness of particles of zero mass,
these particles may be photons,
virtually space-time points. Material fact
is then created by infinity
or the speed of light of particles.
Movement of
particles of zero mass then creates a zone of downstream movement as motion systems-phenomena
(i.e. clouds moving and inert particles with a downstream movement,
i.e. in my opinion, with related momentum density of space-time points,
i.e. a momentum p = m * v, where p is the momentum, m the mass and v
velocity, per unit of space-time, which is cubic meter m3)
(see Chapter X.) The relationship
of conservation of momentum and energy). These
movement systems can
be distinguished into the individual
material motion systems with the
downstream movement of the moving material particles of nonzero mass,
phenomena in the physical world (e.g., persons, things, as well as
products or state), or separate reality
and the only one existing intangible movement system, the
downstream movement of the moving and immobile all particles of zero
mass, all the points of space-time. Intangible movement system is all
Being, all reality, matter and emptiness, which are always formed by
moving or immobile particles of zero mass, probably photons, all points
of space-time. This movement within intangible movement system may be
directed either material
motion system to extend or
its breakdown, it occurs
when a clash of particles increases or reduces momentum, virtually
energy density of the material movement system out of existence
interval, i.e.
longer the movement
does not follow, i.e. in my opinion momentum density of material
particles (particles with nonzero mass) of
this movement system. Extension or the collapse of mass movement
system-phenomenon, however, always lead to a new physical
phenomenon-movement system, ultimately to the formation of a single
continuous material and intangible movement system, phenomenon in terms
of infinite time. Therefore one can speak about a common nature
of extension and degradation of the continuous material movement systems-phenomena, namely in
terms of Philosophy of Balance of social sciences about supraagencies of co-
and contra-agency of good and evil. In other words, all the collisions
and struggles in the material world are to end with the peace in
endless time.
Movement can be
further divided into formation,
i.e. extending the material movement system-a phenomenon, performance, when the
material movement system-the phenomenon does not extend but even does
not degenerate and termination, when
the material movement system-phenomenon is breaking. The
movement can then be conceived as overall
movement, i.e. the movement of all points
of space-time-particles of zero mass and unit movement, which is
the movement of the photon whose speed is lower than the speed of
light, i.e. the movement of particles of zero momentum, from which is
composed each complex movement of non-zero momentum and
energy. In addition to the
overall movement and stillness of a single movement system of
particles of zero mass, space-time points, there is nothing,
these particles touch each other as points of space-time and they
complete both the mass and the vacuum-absolute emptiness. Furthermore,
it is possible to distinguish the motion, virtually material motion system
into systems of the same
energy, virtually momentum, higher and lower
energy, virtually momentum-movement (in terms of Philosophy of Balance
of social sciences supra, sub and sameagency).
These kinds of
tangible and intangible (particles with zero mass) motion of particles
can then embody and describe every
existing material fact, which is
essentially movement of
particles of zero mass again.
In line with
the philosophy of Confucius
I see a single character between the development and disappearance of
the motion systems in the development of single harmonic intangible and tangible motion system-reality, one Being
consisting of all creatures and all, in the fusion with the intangible
God, with harmony of all points of space-time. In accordance with Alfred North Whitehead
the movement and stillness of particles of zero mass are continuum, a continuous unity, intangible energy
and wave, where each part is connected with
the total being, virtually movement and stillness, and as such it feels
them. Each particle of zero mass, point of the space-time affects only
the other surrounding particles of zero mass, space-time points, and
every movement of particles of zero mass is transmitted through these
touch on the surrounding particles of zero mass, which, in turn
transmit the movement in their surroundings this is how this movement
is gradually transferring to all existing particles of zero mass, the
whole being, which is generated by them.
In the evolution the process
of creating a single
harmonic tangible and intangible motion system-phenomenon
is a process of continuous conflicts of the material
motion systems-phenomena with a different momentum-movement, where the
development of motion system with higher momentum-movement comes into
conflict with another movement systems-phenomena of surroundings
through conflicts of their particles, and, where it is probably the endless process. But in
terms of infinite time it
will be created a single harmonic intangible and tangible motion system-reality one
Being consisting of all creatures and all. Here the dialectical
doctrine of Hegel
applies in terms of the final time and the theory of evolution Herbert Spencer in
terms of infinite time.
I identify
within the metaphysics the God with intangible total stillness and
motion of particles of zero mass, all points of space-time, which
are infinite, eternal (as the law on conservation of momentum and
energy) coherent unity which one sees also as material world and the emptiness,
it is somewhat superficial. I refer here in terms of the exact sciences
to pantheism of Baruch
Spinoza.
2nd PHILOSOPHY
OF BALANCE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Formation:
How the world was born,
I now think,
if the answer is in being,
in which the mind shines.
The mind is a mosaic
designed to fold,
each step forward
is worthy of celebration.
I am not free from errors,
anger bothers me
and my evil deeds
accompany all hopeful.
Performance:
In the confusion of events,
they are at war,
thinking about peace,
real fairy tale.
Peace is the ruler of the world,
where each of its sentences
means the
new emergence
or inherent extinction.
The infinite sequence,
a first
of Sciences
obvious to each consciousness
saturated by its senses.
How to shake off the curse
of being confused,
which is constantly going
the good
laughs to evil.
But also the good wins
and evil is beaten constantly,
finally no losers and winners
in existence they always diverges each other.
Whose side do I give,
when good triumphs
or if evil defeats it,
shall I go with the winners?
That is the contradiction of my being
or go through the victim
or use my power
the weak to beat.
Must be found
second of the
Sciences,
it is quiet
none of these routes.
Goodness is always followed by evil,
evil again calls for good,
peace did not find again
to wait for war.
No choice but the victim
For good thing
or for evil yet
the person should bring.
What has changed,
evil but also good
escaped unscathed,
not diminished.
Therefore search third of sciences
to love also right now,
but just as evil,
to stay in the middle.
In the confusion of being processes
agreement between them
was closed forever
and it embraces harmony.
Termination:
If you want to live in Peace
to respect internal harmony,
then I must not side,
the good and evil to reconcile.
But goodness is real,
deciding impartially,
balancing
both the evil and good.
Where is the true center
of both good and bad events
to be found on road,
where the least resistance is.
Search peace there
now and in eternity,
this is the highest,
what makes up the Universe.
2.2 About God (Metaphysics).
Introduction
Formation:
Where to find heaven
then my mind
asks,
when being is acting,
where only God is.
God has to be powerful,
perfectly good,
action is endless
and for evil generous.
Performance:
Still I think,
that God is everywhere,
where Being is going
and I believe in it.
God, Father of
Being
coinciding with the overall agency,
his two sons,
we name them Christ and the Devil.
Christ as well as Devil
as God, the Father of Being
coincide with the good and evil
and they are part of God.
God as everything
Being
is over
all powerful,
he dominates all eternity
and he is infinite.
Old action lapses
and the new arises,
their work it places
or coming change.
History of good and evil
is so endless,
how one thing ends,
the new
begins in turn.
Above all and in all
God rises
formed by unfathomable whole
with his sons.
Who is the Creator
of all good and evil,
who created God,
my mind fights with the enemy.
God is all happening,
in which Being lives,
always good and evil,
non- and existent.
Addition to the fact something and nothing
my mind does not know anything,
and thus it meets
almighty
and
infinite God.
Subagencies:
God is the dual,
good and bad events,
evil fights with all
good connects all again.
God's
Being
system
evil always destroys,
good forms again,
together in an eternal struggle.
Bad idea is
burning to me,
is God
always good,
when his
being
son
is except
Christ also the Devil.
God is the total coagency,
both good
as well as evil,
otherwise he would be limited.
God as a greater good
created a devastating evil
due to the higher equilibrium
to a good formation agency.
Something and nothing,
being in their eternal struggle,
are the agency,
by which all being is balanced.
Something and nothing happens
it stems from the constant struggle
of good coagency
and evil of contraagency.
Nothing recedes from something first
or it absorbs
something
and vice versa, something is happening
in the form of supracoagency.
God is so good Father,
who loves his children,
whether Christ or Devil,
there he sees no blame on them.
If God loved
just a good son,
if he denied evil,
he would be guilty.
Since also the Devil
the blood of his blood
as Christ
he is also happening.
Actual highest good
and therefore God
my mind found
in love for the good and evil.
Sons of God fight against each other,
only the father's love links them,
wherein the love of father lies,
the answer is in equilibrium.
God does not side evil or good,
like the fateful weight
at the point of least resistance
he ends historical wars.
God is in every agency
of good and evil present
God is above good and evil,
that each plays on his field.
In the history of good and evil
field of Christ
and the Devil
are always in
balance
by loving God´s effort.
The fields of good and evil
must not cross
this is the custom of old,
otherwise one would win.
Good would live forever,
evil would be dead forever,
Being would never happen,
standing would be endless.
Everything and everyone would be
for ever perfect,
any imperfection is already
constantly being of agency battle of
good and evil.
God
World in terms of
Philosophy of Balance of social sciences is an agency and stillness,
in terms of Philosophy of Balance
of
exact science it is movement
and stillness characterized by quantity momentum p = m * v, where
p is the momentum, m mass and v velocity. This action, or movement and
stillness, if we understand it as a movement and immobility of
particles of zero mass, as intangible movement and stillness, energy,
as all points of space-time it is the embodiment of every reality in
our world. In other words, every fact in nature is motion and stillness
of particles of zero mass, space-time points and energy. For example a
man, as well as any tangible thing are merely the movement of particles
of zero mass, points of space-time, energy.
God then, in my opinion, is all movement and
stillness of particles of zero mass, all points of space-time, all the
energy that only human mind
perceives as material world, in
reality it is an energy,
motion, or waves, it is continuous
and not discontinuous, as they are apparently the facts in the physical
world. This concept corresponds to the biblical image of God, burning
bush, non-imaginable God and the God of hosts. But God does not exhaust
through the material world, because there are probably the worlds of
other dimensions. I am thinking especially movement of particles in the speed of light
apparently of infinite energy, which
according to the Philosophy of Balance of physics is in case of
movement of the speed of light, a world that is completely different
through its properties from our world, a world, where light is not
lighting matter and not lighting matter is light (see point 13 of
Chapter VII.)
Physical theory of relativistic energy, Chapter x) World Light and y) Why did God commit
evil in the world , section Evil
Chapter 2.6
How to live (ethics) ),
possibly
movement with finite energy of higher speed than the speed of light in
surroundings of our Universe.
God as all
movement and stillness of a zero-mass particles-photons, all points of
space-time, intangible energy (whereas it is represented by movement of
particles of zero mass, not as electrons and other particles of nonzero
mass) he is so over all
powerful and
omniscient due to the fact, that this intangible
energy is composed of space-time points in every physical object and
the person i.e. also man who is ultimately also the movement of
particles of zero mass, space-time points, it is an intangible energy,
virtually movement.
God is also infinite, because
every movement, virtually energy from the law of conservation of
energy, virtually momentum is indestructible. The movement or energy
cannot be destroyed under the law of conservation of energy and
momentum, it can only be transformed into another type of movement,
energy, such as kinetic energy to the internal potential energy,
mechanical energy to electrical energy, etc.
God is also absolutely free, because there
are not strong links with space-time points at these points. Strong
links of points of space-time are generated by the matter,
namely the world of humans and other living creatures who are more or
less free, depending on, how micro particles making up their minds,
virtually brain cells of their brain are linked by free or fixed bonds.
Strong links with the brain cells are the basis of human mental
complexes, virtually instincts in animals.
God is also good, because collisions of micro
particles, of which number is somewhat probability random, which are
forming bodies of macro world, and thus form the basis of collisions in
our world (in macro world in terms of physics), they are a matter of
chance and probability. Taking only two micro particles, and
after each collision according to de Broglie waves and Heisenberg
uncertainty principle further movement can be determined only vaguely
based on probability, which therefore applies also to their next
collision. By more or low probable deviation
of the various micro particles from their most probable motion it is
secured in nature, that such collisions have been progressively
constrained by mutual interactions of micro particles, the movement of
the micro particles (i.e. energy) with high probability is ultimately
directed to the location of the micro particles (i.e. energy) of low
probability, thereby reducing the probability of collisions of micro
particles in the micro world, and ultimately of the bodies of macro
world (i.e. mechanical
basis of evolution). In other words in my opinion evolution
is directed to the termination of collisions and evolution from a less
to more probable state of nature.
God as a
movement or stillness, virtually intangible energy in the material
world, consisting of all points of space-time, he is also a double, it
is the movement to a
particular whole, it is generated by the
continuous movement of material phenomena, then clouds of particles of
nonzero mass with the downstream movement, i.e. the size of momentum
density, virtually energy density, i.e. momentum, virtually energy per
unit of volume, which is promoted by the collisions of particles and the movement from a whole,
where through the collision of two material motion
systems-phenomena new tangible
movement system-a phenomenon arises, either by merging two
existing material motion systems-phenomena (see above) or their cancellation (see movement
from a whole), which is pushing new continuous
system of momentum-motion-energy density through collisions of
particles. Material motion system-phenomenon in the material world
is so a cloud of particles of nonzero mass, which is continuously
increasing and reducing the amount of movement, i.e. the energy,
virtually momentum-motion per unit of volume. In terms of God, a
single unit, the only Being, a single soul, but there is only
one intangible motion system, a
cloud of moving and immobile particles of zero mass, all points of
space-time with the downstream movement, i.e. the size of momentum
density, virtually energy density, i.e. momentum, virtually energy per
unit of volume.
Thus we have
defined good and evil in the
material world operating either
integrity or disintegration of the new material movement
system-material phenomenon. Both are the basic characteristics of God
as an intangible energy or movement and immobility of particles of zero
mass, space-time points within the material movement systems-phenomena
of the material world. Goodness is the aforementioned motion to the
certain material motion system-phenomenon and evil-movement from a certain material movement system-phenomenon.
But who created that all
movement and stillness of particles of zero mass, space-time points, or
God? Law of
conservation of energy shows, that the
motion or energy cannot arise, it can only be transformed into new
forms. God is so infinite and eternal.
All movement
and stillness of particles of zero mass, space-time points, all
existing power as God is characterized by a total momentum, this
momentum is reflected as steady
state, in which increasing momentum on the
one hand, it causes an immediate reduction of momentum on the other
side, which stems from the law of conservation of momentum, virtually
energy. Law of conservation of energy virtually the momentum shows that
the new power cannot emerge from nothing, which means that any increase
in kinetic energy of a material motion system-a phenomenon it must be
reflected as a reduction of energy of other physical object in reality.
The ideal way to move energy between living creatures it is to receive
energy-power from inanimate nature, not at the expense of another
person or creature.
The process of
increasing mobility and the process of reducing movement of material
motion systems-phenomena it is development leading to create a single motion system in tangible and intangible world, the only Being
made up of everyone and everything as an imaginary person mingling with
God as a single entity, one soul, of one coherent and harmonic
motion and stillness of particles of zero and nonzero mass.
It is a constant clash between new and new material motion
systems-phenomena that arise in the process of increasing and
decreasing momentum-motion. Increasing momentum-motion of a
material motion system-phenomenon it is an immediate reduction in
the momentum-motion of other material movement
system-phenomenon, which arises from the law of conservation of
momentum. The process of increasing and decreasing momentum-means the
building of a total tangible and intangible (in terms of
particles of zero mass, in my view of God, one soul, being) harmonic
movement system-reality and the redistribution of energy and
momentum-movement and stillness to its formation.
The
momentum-movement redistribution through collisions of material particles (particles of nonzero
mass) among the material motion systems-phenomena in the process of
increasing and reduction provides a harmonic
movement in the material world, a movement
similar to movement of particles of zero mass, which in preservation of all living motion systems-individuals each of these motions system will move with sustainable maximum possible
momentum-motion, energy, power, with a minimum of collisions with other
particles in the light of eternity, i.e. objective ideal momentum.
In other words, in the total motion system-reality, the total
momentum-motion, and kinetic energy of each physical motion system-a
phenomenon it will be in line with its objective ideal (continuous
maximum) energy-momentum, movement, and power. From the perspective of
eternity, so as to ensure, that any conscious material movement
system-individual met his or her objective ideal (continuous maximum)
energy-momentum, movement, power, and their movement
adapted to it. It is that every living creature gained the
maximum sustainable power, momentum, energy, which means, that he or
she interfered at least in a dispute with other living creatures, who
also received the maximum sustainable power. The maximum sustainable perfect or imperfect power
in
some time, it is the objective ideal power. And while the
maximum sustainable power of a living whole is then the
maximum, if it consists of the maximum sustainable power of all
individuals, when there is
only one material and intangible motion system,
a cloud of material and intangible (of zero
mass) particles with continuing momentum, i.e. without mutual
conflicts.
Good and
evil are so the
means of new movement system-phenomenon origin in the material world,
whether by way of increase or decrease in power, energy, momentum of
current physical motion systems-phenomena and as such they play in the
history of evolution their role and they exist only in terms
of people and things, of partial material movement, not in terms of
God, the whole movement and immobility of particles of zero mass. In terms of whole the
total momentum-energy, movement, or power remains maintained, which arises from the law
of conservation of energy, virtually momentum-motion, and therefore the
total momentum-movement should be divided among the various living
material movement sub-systems-individuals, that all living
material movement sub-system
remain on condition, that individuals are not an
immediate danger to other living material system-individual of the same
range, which cannot be averted otherwise, that cases of legitimate
self-defense or extreme emergency.
God one can
therefore imagine as a single soul consisting of more
or less tangible thoughts, each idea has a
fixed dimension in the form of cloud
of particles of a certain momentum, energy.
This cloud of particles-idea is structured like the physical phenomenon
and its momentum can be in the range of zero momentum (particles of
zero mass-photons-space-time points in the final quantity and speed
less than the speed of light) in the form of a intangible ideas or
non-zero momentum in the form of material things or creature, the
non-zero momentum, the idea may take up to infinite values in the form
of
general Being, as a
single soul, formed
by tangible sub-ideas,
such as sub-souls e.g. of human as the only
Being made up of everyone and everything, the whole movement and
immobility of particles of zero mass, as perfect God in my conception.
These particles
constituting intangible and material ideas and ultimately a
single soul, God, they have a different weight and speed, i.e. the
momentum, it concerned is ultimately, however, these particles of zero
mass, i.e. photons
space-time points.
Afterlife
It can be
considered, that after the death of the man,
virtually of other living organism in nature we become a part of
nature, either in the form of more or less energetic dense waves.
Most energy-dense wave is electromagnetic
waves, e.g. light, which according to me is also some form of
thinking, the soul of man in his or her life (i.e. partly
electromagnetic impulses between neurons), where time
slows down and space reduces because of
time dilation and length contraction with an increased velocity
of body under Special Theory of Relativity by A.
Einstein. Furthermore, in order there are different
material waves, virtually mass (by physical theory of de
Broglie waves the waves are also characteristic of matter.). Furthermore, in order there is stationary absolute vacuum, which speeds up the
living organism time and which increases space as a result of slowing
the movement of Special Theory of Relativity by A. Einstein.
So live body after death will merge with live or inanimate nature and
it need not lose its consciousness yet.
God according to the Philosophy of Balance of social sciences is entire agency,
According to the Philosophy of Balance
of
the exact sciences is all
movement and stillness, which present,
inter alia, any reality.
People and other
living creature before death through their
consciousness and conscious experience of the world they see the world
as discontinuum waves, matter and emptiness. They perceive the world as surface, they do not see in their consciousness
to the nature of the world, the world as a single continuum of harmony
of particles of zero mass, all points of space-time, single soul, Being, omnipresent God in my conception.
This surface experience of
the world, where they see its individual
parts and the self as a separate system the man, virtually other living
creature before death called as life. This life is interrupted by dreamless sleep, when
man and other living creatures dive back into the world in its true
essence, it is a world of particles of zero mass, the points of
space-time.
This God
present in all space-time points, probably photons at rest or a higher
speed up to the speed of light, ultimately up to the infinite quantity
is ubiquitous, present in both electromagnetic waves, such as light, as
well as in mass or in an absolute vacuum (see section 12.4 chapter. VII.) Physical
theory of relativistic energy) We can say,
that as the omnipresent God is present in all
living organisms and the inanimate mass, he is a friend of all living
and non-living organisms and he establishes a balance among them while
mutual killing of living organisms for mutual eating of organic matter.
God is
omnipresent, also present in the two components of our Universe, in an
absolute vacuum, which is the cause of all in our Universe destructive,
analytical processes, representing a return to zero energy density,
nothing, and also in the electromagnetic waves, e.g. light, which in
our Universe are the cause of all creative, synthetic processes,
representing a return to the high energy density of electromagnetic
waves, and also it is present in their mixture in the form of matter. Light, virtually electromagnetic waves represents
Christ and an absolute vacuum the Devil, who may be
characterized as knowing beings subject to the omnipresent God, who
raised a balance between their agencies, he is their mutual friend, who
is connecting them.
Man before death is made up from
matter and the electromagnetic wave and an absolute vacuum. They have
an opportunity to be like God a friend of all the living and
the dead, of Christ and the Devil and of other people and living
organisms (animals, insects, plants, fungi, living cells, bacteria,
viruses, etc.). After the death of a living
organism he or she will become part of more or less common being,
ideally as God, a friend of everyone, that he or she will merge with
them. These common beings, unless it is concerned an
omnipresent God, they may be of the speed of movement of them forming
space-time points, probably photons either
closer to electromagnetic waves, e.g. light of speed
approaching the speed of light or an absolute
vacuum of speed approaching zero, i.e. immobility, it is
closer to either the creation or destruction. These common
beings go across inanimate and living nature
and combine all friendly living organisms, such as
Catholics, Muslims, Jews, atheists, predators, herbivores, etc., in
other words, they suppress otherness. Common
intersection of these common beings is the man before death.
Example of a similar concept is orthodox system of Indian philosophy
Sánkja and yoga based on the dual principle, namely on the
one hand, prakrti, original nature, the principle of active material,
which is in constant motion, but it lacks self-awareness, and on the
other hand Purusa purely spiritual principle, which is not active, but
spiritual and gifted by mind. In the individual life as well as the
larger events of the world it depends therefore on the Purusa his
sight. Prakrti-feminine principle, not without a deeper reason, as to
her salvation she needs something else that is out of her, she must so
long develop in front of sight of Purusa (as a dancer performs
viewers), until Purusa
realizes his
otherness and he turns from her and himself and prakrti he saves.
In my
above-mentioned concept, that implies the possibility that person before death interferes constantly with the
surrounding reality, i.e., living creatures after death, who, after
death by the above-mentioned manner merged with nature whether living
or dead, who, as part of the common beings are embodied in the
surrounding living organisms, humans and other living creatures and
surrounding inanimate nature, with their thoughts, the person before
death is to adhere to one worldview, virtually common being or before
the death to form his or her own worldview, to be adopted by all, or to
devise a way to achieve a world without conflicts, The world
of general reconciliation and brotherhood, messianic
peace,
which has said Isaiah And the cow and the bear shall feed; And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice' den. (Isaiah 11.7 et seq.), Therefore as:
1.) Stop further death of living creatures, virtually discovery of how to eat
minerals, inorganic substances, like plants in photosynthesis,
2.) Resurrect (e.g. through the genetic code) all the dead
creatures to a new life, a return to all existing mass the
nature of the earlier live now dead creatures, because a happy life for
all living creatures (heaven) is probably to be achieved only by the
resurrection of life, virtually the eternal life on this Earth (heaven
on Earth), not only after death, perfectly dispersed as described above
in the ubiquitous God (but a human or other living creature in
nature he or she is not probably designed during their life to
blend perfectly with God, Christ or Devil, but, that they live in
harmony as friends as during the life in the biblical paradise) or
3) Other option as the resurrection is that a
person after death can thanks to his or her just life with a
single Philosophy of Balance, which occurs, as a result of the
intersection of all living organisms after death, i.e. of a man before
his or her death, especially his or her consciousness, which is
compatible with the worldviews of all of these common beings of living
organisms after death, to conciliate, or to
be friend of all these common beings of living organisms after
death, and link them into a single common being same with
omnipresent God, it is to bring heaven after death.
How to stop further
unnecessary death of living creatures, and perhaps even to revive them
with the progress of science or to conciliate
all the dead and the living creatures, who all shall be friends for
life and death in the biblical paradise or heaven. In
my opinion the diet and performance of my three rules in Chapter
I.)
The merger of spiritual and natural (exact) sciences are paramount, in which I
elaborated the idea that was previously contained in the Bible: But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance. Matthew 9.13, or elsewhere: But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless. Matthew 12.7.
Literature
1) STORIG, H.J.: Malé dějiny filosofie. Praha, Zvon, 1991.
p. 57 et seq.
2.) http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1095 : Spekuluji, co bude po smrti ,
http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1098 : Spekuluji, co bude po smrti II.
http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1119
God's love
According to my
Philosophy of Balance God is
continuum-connection of
particles of zero mass, space-time points
lining our material
world, in which we live, thus we
perceive the God only as the surface, as particles, which are
characterized by motion,
energy virtually momentum in the range of motion of matter.
God as continuum-linked particles of zero mass and dimension, i.e.
space-time points he loves the world of seemingly
discontinuous-discrete matter in all its components-individuals.
God's love is
manifested in the life of the individual through the effect of
particles of zero mass, space-time points in the other particles-points
of space-time, photons, of both a
zero mass and non-zero relativistic mass when the particles of zero
mass are grouped in an infinite number or the speed of light to form
the matter particles hence the material world. The matter
particles interact, slamming into each other, rubbing themselves,
cuddling together, and thus they are acting upon the laws of physics,
particularly law on the
conservation of momentum and energy and the third Newton's laws of action and reaction.
These massive particles and their clusters are
thus redistributing momentum among themselves to create steady state when they will not bump into each
other, they just touch, without loss of energy virtually momentum
and so to maintain their momentum or even energy, which suits them.
Love of God so in our world it is a matter raising successive
steady-state, through conflicts of material particles and redistribution
of momentum, virtually energy it allows a redistribution of a
single continuum-linked particles of zero mass, space-time
points, the photons within the matter and vacuum-absolute emptiness in
the Universe, thus the characteristics of God
of intangible energy.
How, then, this
equilibrium state looks,
which in the physical world is raised by the power of God's
program, which is own to the world, its purpose and, with which this
world was created. It is the movement of material particles and their
objects with the stable maximum sustainable momentum-motion, energy,
power that will not loose through clashes with other material
particles, virtually objects, which will also move with the constant
momentum-sustainable movement.
It will meet
the model that is for the
material world a continuum-continuity, consistency and harmony
of world of particles of zero mass points
in space-time, which also do not collide together and create a coherent
and harmonic-connected space-time of dimensions
of matter (or complex other matter in the world of higher speed than
the speed of light, see Einstein´s Special Theory of
Relativity) and light (see points 11., 12., 13., 14. Chapter VII.) Physical
theory of relativistic energy). These
particles of zero mass are already a perfect world, where the
balance is raised, which is the essence of our world, that we perceive
somewhat superficial. In my opinion this continuum of points of the
zero weight represents the whole of God, in our view it makes our
material world to follow its model and rearranging also to the
harmonic form of particles of eternal harmonic movement and stillness
maintained by the law of conservation of energy virtually momentum
without collisions with other particles and objects forever. To the only tangible-material and intangible movement
system, a single cloud of particles with zero mass (photons,
points of spaces) and non-zero mass with the downstream movement and
stillness, which includes everyone and everything.
We can say,
that the world loves us, and
therefore God as the world, which I equate loves us, because we
are more likely directed to the rearrangement of the energy of material
particles, or their momentum to the perfect world almost without
conflicts with the eternal maximum sustainable movement virtually
momentum and energy, power. The programming of our world is the love of
God, which we see before us as a model in the world of intangible
particles of zero, mass and dimension, i.e. space-time points and, that
we should and we are forced to follow.
This following is the sustainable consciously
approaching to the world of the maximum sustainable momentum-the
movement of its all particles, i.e. permanent world almost
without conflicts and loss of energy, virtually momentum, i.e. without
death, creating a single Being, including each and all with one mind
and one soul. Sort of legal entity,
consisting of its members, which is omniscient
and omnipotent, because it is omnipresent.
This world we cannot in material form to
approach revolutionarily but evolutionarily, a
sustainable manner. As sudden only
temporary move closer to the ideal particles
(maximum) momentum, energy, virtually movement, which is not
permanent, it meets with a
misunderstanding, collisions of particles of their
surrounding, which they make to
return to the original imbalance, i.e. alternately increasing and
decreasing momentum-movement. Therefore it
requires a permanent change that can be achieved only by a gradual
transformation of the material world, when there is a permanent rather
than temporary approach to harmonic eternal movement and immobility of
particles with zero mass of the intangible world.
However, it
would boost us, that the
world loves us and it directs us to the
perfect state, virtually eternal movement of material particles, which
will not conflict with other
tangible-material particles or their clusters-tangible objects,
and it will apply the law of conservation of energy virtually momentum
for ever. At the same time, we should reciprocate
the love of this world, which is God's love, with our love to the
world, when we seek an approach to
the perfect state of perpetual motion and immobility of the particles
according to the law of the conservation of momentum.
2.3 About basis of being (ontology)
Introduction
Formation:
My mind is looking for
base of all Being,
it has to be mass
or just ideas.
What is our God,
matter or spirit,
of what is good
and of what evil again.
What is the reality
and what it is not,
perhaps it's matter,
perhaps thinking.
Performance:
This dispute is odd,
all the Being
is still going continuously
as a whole or individually.
Each agency of Being
is composed of parts,
that our mind divides
in a single agency.
First the agency arises,
then the work places,
if it does not come to change,
so it will lapse.
But in fact
agencies are not many,
it is only one,
that is for us the God.
Mind breaks agency
to the composite events,
single agencies
again it divides.
Formation and termination
separate
performance,
if no change,
which are also composed agencies.
Formation, performance and termination
are part of an overall agency,
but in reality with no limits
they exist only in mind.
The formation is the performance
well as termination,
performance is the formation
and also termination.
Termination is performance
well as the formation
and together are part
in a single all-agency.
So smaller agencies
compose larger
we call them complex
consisting the
simpler.
. The individual imaginary agencies
do not live separately,
they are part of
total agency
being infinitely.
So God is matter,
also mind is created him,
the initial substance,
that with the mind is in the dispute.
The agency is so infinite
complex and simple,
no beginning and end,
it forms a single whole.
Simple agencies
mind perceives
as mass
and more complex agencies
we call thought.
In endless agency
there is God as the Eternal Being
both a complex substance
and also the idea.
In other words mass
creates idea
and vice versa idea
is lightening in the matter.
The number of total performance agency
is the God's total formation by the beginning,
as a valid law of conservation of energy
it remains forever the same and unchanged.
This applies also to individual
formation subagencies,
that in the overall formation agency
are always included from the beginning.
Simple agencies expire
and the complex arises
or vice versa it changes and it is associated
the system of existence.
This agency is called change,
which accompanies the termination of agency,
old agency sometimes changes
in the agency with the same number.
Agencies are good
or bad,
one destroys everything in common,
other all common forms,
but each in its field.
The fields are in balance
ruled by the
total Being,
who loves its children
Christ with the Devil.
So different subagencies
both good and bad,
which now we call the co- and contra-agency,
create a supracocontracoagency.
About basis
of being
In terms of
Philosophy of Balance of social sciences the Being is agency and motionless, in terms of Philosophy of
Balance of the exact sciences Being
is motion and
motionless of
particles of zero mass, space-time points.
This being is also God
(see Section God Chapter 2.2 About God (metaphysics) and God and
music section of chapter 2.8 About beautiful (aesthetics)) as a
community of each and all, the
idea is then a model, i.e. the movement of
low total momentum-motion, energy captured in consciousness, mass is the movement
of the high overall momentum-motion, energy. Idea and the imaginary
mass, however, have similar structure differing only in the number or
velocity of particles of zero mass, space-time points.
Matter represents the movement of atoms of chemical
elements, atoms represent the movement of electrons, protons
and neutrons, and thus it can be continued in terms of Philosophy of
Balance of the exact sciences to particles of zero rest mass, which
seem to be photons at rest, space-time points.
In its essence
this matter is this motion of photons, the points of space-time either
with the speed of light, or infinite number
as well as being is this stillness and the movement of particles of
zero rest mass, the points of space-time. Speed of light of photons
allows the particles of zero-mass to reach the positive non-zero numbers of energy, i.e. the material phenomena (see
Chapter VII.)
Physical theory of relativistic energy), as well as
in the case of an infinite number of photons of the zero weight,
space-time points, zero times infinity it can give a positive non-zero
number, a physical phenomenon again. Our
mind sees the move as discontinuous material things
in our world, but in fact the movement
of particles of zero rest mass-photons, the points of space-time,
this follows from the nature of this move as waves etc. Link of this movement
takes the form of gradually increasing and decreasing or identical
motion, momentum of particles similar to harmony of music, where the
tones are increasing and decreasing continuously. This link is more
property of waves of
particles of zero mass, space-time points than
the material things, which in the area of material particles are
from the perspective of human an incoherent puzzle, which is necessary
first to pass into a coherent interplay own to the waves and music,
virtually of movement of particles of zero rest mass, space-time
points, when also the material things they have wave characteristics,
which derives from de Broglie waves known in physics. In reality,
however, material things are coherent continuous-wave within the
meaning of de Broglie waves but only in terms of particles with zero
mass-photons, the points of space-time, because of the gradual
reduction, virtually increasing of movement, momentum of particles
corresponding to greater differences in these movements and momentum in
terms of maters and material (with non-zero mass) particles it
is concerned a jump-issue, therefore one perceives them as discrete but related things and phenomena.
Material facts
have the nature of the seemingly separate physical motion
systems-phenomena (i.e., clouds
of particles of nonzero mass characterized by a continuous increasing
and decreasing or the consistency of this motion, momentum per unit of
space, it is a continuous arrangement of particles), which only slowly
are changing their momentum-motion by collisions with surrounding
particles, which results from its relatively high overall
momentum-movement. Each material
motion
system-phenomenon is going through
three stages
of existence, formation, when it grows, i.e. increasing the number of
material (a non-zero mass) particles of continuous momentum-movement,
performance, i.e. the very existence of material movement
system-phenomenon, when it is no longer increasing number of particles
of continuous momentum-movement and termination, when number of
particles continues to decrease.
Formation,
termination and performance of material motion
systems-phenomena are part of a single movement of particles of zero
mass, space-time points. From the
perspective of the eternal formation, termination and performance they
will be part of single
continuous agency or material motion system, a cloud of particles of nonzero mass of the
downstream movement and stillness, momentum, virtually energy density
(momentum per unit of volume), where
living organisms will move with the maximum momentum density-motion, power with minimal clashes with
other motion sub-systems - events, that they will gain through the transformation of inanimate matter, it
is the merging of each and everything into a single being with one will
and consciousness. This enables to living organisms the conservation of
energy, virtually momentum (eternal life), as they move with the
maximum momentum density-motion,
power. Eternal life is made possible by the moving object, which does
not shrink, only touches other bodies or particles, so it does
not lose energy and momentum under the law of energy conservation, virtually momentum, so it
exists forever. This gradual increase in energy in our dimension for
living organisms, it will be achieved at the expense of inanimate
matter, which will be transformed into the necessary energy.
Each dimension such as the world of matter
is then endowed with its momentum, virtually energy-motion, an energy
exchange between the dimensions is achieved by the conversion of light
into matter such as photon absorbed by material and conversion
of matter into light by its radiation. Example is interface of our dimension and apparently the
dimension of the higher speed than the speed of light.
If we substitute in the relativistic relations the
higher velocity than
the speed of light, we get time, weight and length as the complex numbers,
it is fundamentally different quantities This generates the fact, that
there is apparently double
flow of momentum and
energy between these dimensions and vice versa caused by the light dimension in an explosion of stars, creation of
black holes and the expansion of the Universe (see
point 12., 13., 14. of Chapter VII.)
Physical theory of relativistic energy )..
Movement
towards the whole
is
harmonic with the material motion system-phenomenon, the movement from the whole is disharmonic with this material motion system-phenomenon, the fact,
it approaches momentum density-motion of its particles below or above
their subsistence interval of continuous-motion momentum density of the
particles of the material movement system-phenomenon, it disturbs the material movement system link, virtually its continuous
motion, momentum. An example is exposure of human to the
increased or decreased temperature or radiation when the tissues are
from the certain degree decaying. Then the property of
material movement system-phenomenon as a cloud of particles of
nonzero mass characterized by an equivalence of momentum density-motion, gradually decreasing and
increasing of momentum density-movement through clashes with the
tangible-material elements as
quantity of momentum per unit of volume, it is the ability to
absorb other material particles of different momentum-move and to adapt
them and to integrate them in the form of a collision with these
particles. An example is the change in body temperature during change
in ambient temperature. The condition of maintaining the material movement
system-phenomenon in this the collision then it stems from its
definition, it is therefore necessary, that in modified momentum
density-movement there the coherent structure would be also
maintained in the above sense of material (a non-zero mass) of
particles. The dislocations of physical movement system-phenomenon must
not be caused, through the disturbance of its orderliness, continuum
of its movement, momentum. An example is the decay of human
tissue at elevated or reduced temperature, decaying of organism as an
orderly whole.
In terms of
movement of particles of
zero mass, the space-time points there is only one motion system-reality forming
a single, continuous, and harmonic whole, the entire Universe is only
composed of these particles, so it is not
in terms of movement of heavier particles of matter (i.e.
of non-zero weight), where the link is given by the same movement,
momentum density, virtually gradually increasing or reducing
motion-momentum density due to the collision of same, virtually particles with different
movement, energy, virtually momentum.
In addition,
there is subjective ideal
momentum-motion for specific
movement system-phenomenon, in which particles move with the maximum
possible momentum-motion, which may not be sustainable, in the case of
movement system of man it is concerned man power, who does not
feel any resistance in the short term, no stress, pain or suffering
through collisions with particles of the other physical motion
systems-phenomena. This subjective ideal momentum-motion, power can be
likened to the movement of the ball, when there is no loss of energy,
for example by friction when the ball does not adapt to the movement of
other spheres in space. In addition there is objective ideal momentum-motion,
when the particles move with the maximum possible momentum-sustainable
movement with a minimum of collisions with other particles of the material
motion
systems-phenomena in terms of infinite time. In the case of movement
system of man it is concerned his or her maximum sustainable power with
respect to other living creatures and things, this is balanced in terms
of long-term, the minimum feeling of pain, stress and suffering because
of minimal particle collisions with other physical motion
systems-phenomena in the terms of eternal time, it is a conflict with
other living creatures and things. The objective ideal momentum-motion,
power can be compared to the movement of the ball with the maximum
possible sustainable momentum-movement (dynamic equilibrium), there is
the minimum loss of energy, virtually momentum, which are replaced over
time because of the conservation of energy, virtually momentum, and it
is through the minimum possible collisions with other balls in terms of
eternity, to which it will adapt. Increasing momentum of slow balls is
then achieved by converting the energy of inanimate matter. Interval of momentum, virtually energy
density-motion with a maximum limit means
mental stress or pain of a person, which is most bearable,
when there is still no decay of organism by increasing the body's
momentum, virtually energy density-motion, i.e. variable of
momentum, virtually energy per unit of volume, to
exceed the minimum
threshold of the momentum density-motion it means, that
a person feels tired, falls asleep, unconscious or lethargy, while he
or she does not feel pain, decaying body due to a reduction of momentum density-motion. Generally exceeding the minimum
or maximum limits of momentum of material movement system composed of
material (a non-zero mass) moving particles with a downstream movement,
momentum, energy it means, that as a result of collision with other
tangible-material particles with
very different momentum it is decaying orderliness of downstream
motion, momentum or energy of material particles constituting the
material movement system.
Life
History is the
collisions of the tangible-material motions
system-facts
(clouds of material particles with downstream movement momentum
density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume) and the formation of new
material motions systems-facts, of which the momentum,
the movement is equal to the sum of material movement
subsystems-facts, which entered into the conflict.
These new
material movement system arise through the change of existing material motion systems-facts, their
connection or disappearance
of existing material motions system or
systems, facts or phenomenon, where the collisions of particles caused
moving outside the existential momentum density interval of continuous
momentum density-motion (momentum per unit volume) of particles of
these material movement systems-facts (there are formed the clouds of
the disordered material particles, i.e. of non-zero mass, moving with
discontinuous momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume), and
the emergence of new material movement system-phenomenon or connection of the material movement system-phenomenon to the persistent
material movement system-phenomenon with the downstream movement,
momentum density. Example may be tan or burn of the skin and the
disappearance of damaged skin as the material movement
systems-facts of the skin cells.
Life as a fact in terms of Philosophy of Balance of
social sciences is the agency, in terms of Philosophy of
Balance of the exact sciences is complex
movement, which is the product of
collisions of the material
movement systems-facts throughout the period of historical development,
which, unlike inanimate nature is characterized by important features,
i.e. adaptability to around.
This flexibility can be seen as the ability continually to expand their
life existence interval of movement, momentum density, in which
the material movement system
of
life is still able to survive, while approaching its objective
ideal momentum, i.e., the maximum sustained momentum, virtually power.
Hence the connection of material movement system of human body with
other material movement systems (e.g. dress), which aim to
create a new, related material movement system. Thus downstream movement, momentum density (momentum per
unit volume) of related material
motions systems
allows the retention of the downstream movement, momentum density and
connection of these related material movement systems (e.g.,
body and dress) with
surroundings in the only new material motion system of a related movement, momentum density of
material particles (i.e. with non-zero mass).
Specifically, for example, link of the body and clothes, is creating
with the environment of low temperature e.g. in winter the
only related material movement system, a moving cloud
of material (of a non-zero mass) particles with the downstream
movement, momentum density (momentum per unit of volume) of material
particles, and thus extends the interval of existence of material
movement system of human body. Another example is the invention of the
tank, which stands in the way of bullets, and so it prevents to kill a
man, it is to widen the existential interval of man. Or
another example is the invention of space suit, which allows a man to
survive in an open Universe.
Momentum-movement
of life adapted to the many material movement systems in their
conflict throughout history, it is responsible for increasingly perfect mobility, the ideal objective
momentum-motion of this material movement system within the whole motion of Being. Perfection is
achieved, if the momentum- the movement of life will be including in
its complex and detailed structure of light elements all other material
movement systems-facts that exists, to which it adapts, virtually it
contacts with them. Perfect, virtually ideal objective momentum is the
maximum sustainable momentum-motion,
power of movement system-fact (dynamic equilibrium). At the end of
history when a person, hopefully, becomes a powerful and encompasses in
their knowledge of all facts of the Universe, and of everything, when
there would be no conflicts between living creatures, or things
perfection will be achieved.
Material fact
is so a sort of jigsaw
of
all existing material movement systems, a cloud of moving particles
with a downstream movement, momentum density (momentum per unit of
volume), which is to reform and to
combine in a single physical motion system of person's life with a related movement, momentum
density (momentum per unit of volume) of material particles (i.e. of
non-zero mass), that no single
material movement system of our material world was in conflict
with other material movement system. In other words, that all material
movement systems merged into a single material movement system with continuous movement, momentum density
(momentum per unit of volume) and their material particles will move with a minimum of collisions with other
particles in terms of eternal time that the
material movement system had maximum sustainable momentum
(i.e. objective ideal
momentum-motion). These
partial material movement systems maintain permanently their momentum, they will
exist forever. This will result in eternal life for all living
creatures that will derive energy from nonliving matter, which may be
fully carried out apparently in eternal time.
In what way are
there collisions of physical motion systems-facts of living organisms with inanimate nature and
other living organisms? It is
through the collision of particles of the material movement
systems-facts characterized by the relationship for momentum p=m*v,
where m is the mass and v velocity. Any material movement system is
made up of particles of nonzero mass, moving particles, and thus it
creates a greater weight, the higher value of momentum p=m*v.
Ultimately, however, every material fact is in my opinion made up of
photons as particles of zero mass, points of space-time, they
are collected or moved and so they create massive particles like
protons, neutrons, electrons, etc., which move and collide into each
other. In the form of collisions of material particles living organisms are then faced
with the material world. An example of such a
collision may be fired bullets and interview of two people, where
against each other the particles are sent first in the form of the
bullets, the second time in the form of sound waves that are faced with
a given individual as a material movement system, a cloud of particles
of the downstream movement momentum, virtually energy density, i.e.
momentum virtually energy per unit of volume.
Why life did
not generate from inorganic elements. These
elements are usually characterized by a higher weight, i.e. absolute
momentum, which does not enable to them in their compounds
sufficiently precise to respond and to create new really
altered material movement systems-events in response to the
collision of two completely different material movement systems-facts,
or only a few different material movement systems-facts, i.e. to adapt
to this conflict in the form of a sufficiently accurate approximation
to the ideal objective momentum-motion, power (see above). It's like a
house built of large panels and small bricks, only the small brick
house we can gradually adapt in details to emerging customer
requirements. One cast panel, however, can only be changed for another
big panel, and hence it is wasting material and imperfect combination
of materials.
Why only known
life was on Earth? Since there
existed a general material motion field, i.e. a cloud of particles in
the final result of the zero weight of the given organization of
movement, momentum, virtually energy density, which then led in
interacting of particles of this cloud to the resulting imperfect
material movement system characterized as known life. I.e. if such a
general movement field-fact, a cloud of particles of discontinuous
movement, momentum virtually energy density, it were anywhere else in
the Universe, it is possible that there similar forms of life as on
Earth evolved. I.e. process of approaching to the ideal objective
momentum density-motion of the
certain material movement system, which would ensure for each
related material movement system the maximum
sustained momentum-movement, strength with minimal collisions with
other particles according to the law of conservation of
momentum-movement, power, it would be done in this cloud of particles
analogically. Therefore, astronomers are trying to find a planet in the
Universe similar to Earth with similar conditions for life.
Concept
of life as material motion system,
a cloud of material particles (i.e. particles of nonzero mass) is based
on the existence of life in the mass, but each matter, virtually
material movement system exists ultimately also as part of a single
continuous motion system consisting of a cloud of particles of zero
mass, space-time points, except that nothing exists, because the only
intangible (i.e. consisting of particles of zero mass) movement system fills all things, radiation and nothingness. Living in this single harmonic and consistent,
continuous motion system of particles of zero mass one sees only the
surface and further in their interior
as the
unaware feeling, because
our senses cannot detect this movement system, they detect
only material movement systems-facts consisting of particles of nonzero mass,
optionally nothingness, partial discrete facts rather than their unity.
It can be assumed, that for man the ignorant living in the
only existing movement system of particles of zero mass it is eternal and indestructible.
Death
Each live creature is a
material movement system, it is a cloud of particles of nonzero mass
with downstream movement, with value of momentum, virtually energy
density, i.e. momentum, virtually energy per unit of volume, then with
the value of subjective and objective ideal momentum density-motion,
power, with the maximum and
minimum momentum density of movement, the power necessary for survival.
Every living creature like the movement system is exposed to collisions with particles of other material motions system-facts, that
either enhance or reduce its momentum-motion, and in extreme cases
below or above the threshold necessary for the survival of this living
creature, virtually their duration as material movement
system-phenomenon. For example radiation is moving particles, of which
momentum is dangerous to humans, these particles cause a change and
decay of the downstream movement, momentum density of human, virtually
disintegration of human tissues and thus degradation of man as an
organism.
Death is the
collision with a particle or particles, that increase or decrease the
momentum of material motion system below or above the threshold required for the
duration of the material motion system-phenomena. E.g. fired
bullet as a moving particle hits a vital body of man and reduces its
movement, momentum, virtually energy density, power of the body below
the value necessary for survival. In which case the response of live
material movement systems-individuals is to post particles for the
destruction of other material movement system-phenomenon. It is so if we limit its subjective
ideal momentum-motion, power, especially if we want to destroy it, it
is struggling to maintain their own that is life. Here is proverb about
the hazards of the cornered animal. In other words, the greatest risk
of death is, if it is reduced or increased through collisions
of particles of other movement system, the value of
momentum density-motion of any live material movement system above or
below the limit necessary to its survival, virtually it is approaching
the limits of the interval of the existential values of
movement system-phenomenon. Each organism has a limit of
momentum-motion, power, thus the collisions with large or small things
such as particles of radioactive particles, when the body still
survives and when the body is already falling apart. Such limit I
consider as an existential interval, upper and lower limits of organism
existence, virtually its momentum-motion, power as result of a
collision with a thing or other living creature. The lower limit of
momentum-motion, power then is e.g. a cold, which in turn slows through
the collisions of particles of cold environment the human life
functions.
It follows,
that risk of death is
growing, if the motion system-an individual does not
act harmoniously, as to the
compliance of all movement of particles of nonzero mass, namely
harmonic movement of all the energy of space. Compliance of all
existing material movement system means, that we aim to maintain all
the live-material movement system-individuals regardless of their
destructive and creative nature, however, under condition of the
differentiation of their absolute (overall) movement, momentum, i.e.,
power based on its harmfulness or benefit. This means, that a person,
who is a high risk to society, will not be executed (only the case of
legitimate self-defense and extreme emergency is exception), but their
absolute (total) motion, momentum, i.e. the power is so limited, that
he or she cannot cause more damage, that this danger existed
only in the form of the model (see section Model and the
idea of chapter 2.3 About basis of being (ontology)). Harmonic behavior is
approaching the ideal objective momentum, thus approaching the
sustainable maximum momentum-motion, power of material movement
system-individual with minimal clashes with other motion
systems-individuals, and other phenomena. Even here, however, a gradual
increase in momentum-motion, power must be sustainable. Harmonic
behavior can be likened to a situation, where all living creatures have
agreed, there will be the only common will and not the conflicts of
life, while they fully dominate the world of inanimate matter. Only one
being, a fictitious person, would be created, who will act as the
healthy body of any living creature today.
Who is at risk
of collision with particle, which is increasing or decreasing
momentum-motion? Such material movement system-a phenomenon is
vulnerable, which has its momentum density-motion, power close to the
limits of subsistence interval, i.e.
mainly weakened individual or the individual in a fierce battle,
here it is the lowest and highest value of the interval. Regularly the
leader of disharmonic conduct is less vulnerable than its executors,
because they most come into contact with particles of material movement
systems with life-threatening momentum density-motion. This way, you
can also justify the death of older people, because their body is
exposed for a long time to collisions with surrounding particles, which
change movement momentum, virtually energy density, i.e. momentum,
virtually energy per unit of volume, of organs, unlike the ideal
objective density-motion, power (see above), and through both the
internal collision of parts of the body and collision with
surrounding particles. The longer is a person thus exposed to
disharmonic material surroundings, in which these disharmonic facts of
surrounding as clouds of particles of nonzero mass are striking the
man body as an organized cloud of particles of nonzero mass
and it changes their order, the more is the man at risk of the
disintegration of the organism, i.e. a permanent disturbance of the
organization, thus I understand the downstream momentum density-motion,
i.e. momentum per unit of volume.
The question of
eternal life without
death. Man
makes material motion system-phenomena of the material world,
then clouds of moving particles of nonzero mass, that the material
particles do not collide together, but
that their movement followed each other in order not to lose the
momentum-movement through mutual collisions, to touch only in their overall harmonic
movement. The first folded material movement system is a very human
body to be protected from collisions with particles of material
movement system around the body of man. For example, a man came up
clothes to isolate the body temperature of human beings from around
with the difference in temperature, but essentially it is concerned a
single material movement system of man and environment, where different material
moving (of a non-zero mass) particles of the body, clothes and
surroundings create one material movement system, where these particles
together do not collide, but move continuously. By colliding
of material particles the heat exchange-exchange of energy, momentum
would be caused, that just as clothes in the winter we try to avoid.
Thus it is necessary to discover and to
assemble all existing material motion system, material facts, phenomena, clouds of moving
material particles with the downstream movement, momentum density
(momentum per unit of volume)-movement, that the particles did not
collide together, but
they moved harmoniously, that their movements followed, only to touch. Thus compiled
puzzle of material reality is the absolute consistency of material
reality, the eternal life of living material motion systems, i.e. individuals under the law of conservation of
momentum, virtually energy. Model and the guarantee is for us the harmonic
world of space-time points, which with
themselves also do not collide and they only touch, and which also
represent the reason why a puzzle consisted of material movement
systems and phenomena must be put into a single
harmonic material movement system described above, after infinite number of
collisions, when there is redistribution of momentum, the energy of
material movement systems for the purpose of single harmonic material
movement system-phenomenon consisted of whole material reality. These space-time points, probably photons at rest, i.e.
particles with zero mass, they mediate the transfer of movement,
momentum, energy during collisions of particles of material motions systems-phenomena
of material world, clouds of
moving particles of nonzero mass, and thus they ensure
the formation of a single harmonic material movement
system-material reality after infinite number of collisions.
Within this single motion system of particles of zero mass, the points of space-time
we can also speak about eternal life without death, because
under the existing single, consistent and harmonic, continuous motion
system we can talk about one
consciousness, which man or other living creature
living on the surface of the movement system in the mass, they are unaware and which is hidden in their
unconscious and it lives in them only as an
unconscious feeling that is hidden deep in their unconscious and
however in terms of
long-term it is stronger than other emotions.
After the death the
man's consciousness as a set of particles of zero mass, as the points
of space-time scatters again in this one motion system in
all points of space-time and their strength, either prevail, or diminish depending on collisions with
other particles of zero mass, other points of space-time.
Just man so becomes a part in a single motion system of particles of
zero mass, space-time points, which are the sole consciousness and also
the only reality, that include everything. They become part of a single
space-time continuum, a single continuous system of moving and still
points of space-time. Their awareness is increased about knowledge of
everyone and all that becomes
part of one Being, it understands unconscious feeling in their heart.
Man and woman
Energy of light of a non-zero
relativistic mass and velocity equal to the speed of light, and absolute vacuum mean the existence of
parallel worlds, which are characterized by effect of reduction and increasing the momentum,
movement of the material world as the
double
flow of the photons of light absorbed by material and their radiation
during matter combustion thus increasing of the momentum,
virtually energy-the movement of certain material motion
systems-phenomena, it is accompanied by decreasing of momentum,
virtually energy-movement of other material motion systems-phenomena in
the material world. Then there is a clash with particles,
which have higher momentum virtually energy density-motion (i.e.
momentum, virtually energy per unit of volume) than for
example a human or any other living organism have, and also the clash
of particles, which have lower movement momentum, virtually energy
density than the person or other living organism.
Increasing
momentum virtually energy-movement of movement sub-system-individual
then in my opinion it causes
destructive ideas and actions of man and the nature,
which through increasing of momentum, virtually energy-movement of the
material motion systems-individuals of a certain existential interval
of momentum, virtually energy density-movement cause their decay. In
terms of man's consciousness so the increased momentum, virtually
energy density-motion (i.e. momentum, virtually energy per unit of
volume) leads to destructive ideas. This decaying material motion system, a cloud of material particles (of a non-zero
weight) with the downstream movement, momentum density
is a man or any body of living and inanimate nature.
Man is by nature a
creature characterized by apparently higher
average momentum, virtually energy density-motion than the female. This causes
that the particles of man's
material
motion system-organism may be more
easily accelerated thus to exceed the
existential interval of continuum of momentum, virtually energy-density
of movement of the man’s material movement
system-organism, possibly of other material movement system-phenomenon
than particles of material movement system-body of women.
Man is able to
bring more power than a woman and it is so, because he is stronger, so
his body is characterized by
greater absolute (total) momentum-motion.
But at the same weight of men and women a man is able to provide a
higher performance, thus momentum, virtually energy density-movement of
his body is higher than momentum density, movement of women
body. In other words, particles of a male body have
higher momentum, virtually energy density-motion than particles
of woman's body.
Higher momentum
density, therefore the momentum per unit of volume, of the
man’s body can mean during increase of the
momentum-movement of the particles of his body the more prone to destructive conducts
and ideas, whether to their surroundings and to himself. Given that,
this is mostly to move above the upper limit of subsistence interval of
following momentum, virtually energy density-movement of surrounding
material motion systems-phenomena or man's own material movement
system-organism.
Female in
contrary, she is more resistant to the destructive acts than a man, because momentum virtually energy
density-motion of particles of
her body is lower. Therefore she needs more clashes with the
fast particles, that her behavior is destructive.
This destruction manifests
both at the level of individual, the man is more destructive than the
female, and at cellular level, where man is prone to various diseases
and lives for the lower average age than women.
Why history of life was to divide the subjects of improved
forms of life on male and female sex? The
section Live in this chapter shows, that the main merit of
organic life was the ability to adapt to collisions with surrounding
motion systems-effects, whether living or inanimate nature, in the form
of a sustainable increase in the maximum momentum-power of living
creatures. Thus, the distribution of species among male and female
individuals meant the better adjustment (organization of
other material motion systems and thus increasing of
sustainable momentum-motion, power) to their surroundings,
when the material motion systems-facts collide in the
form of particles.
A man can
better react and interfere with the material motion systems-facts of
greater momentum-power, which in collision with the smaller
woman's material motion system-organism would certainly mean
its destruction, the woman would be able to respond better to conflicts
with material motion system-phenomena of lower momentum-power, which
man himself would destruct. So by momentum division of men and women
the accurate response to
specific material motion system-effect corrected by partner conduct
was ensured, i.e. together to achieve the objective
ideal momentum-power, which ensures
the movement with the sustainable maximum momentum density-motion, power over time
without collisions with other particles according to the law of
conservation of momentum.
Thus resulting improved extensive material motion system-phenomenon,
based on a conflict of particles of various material motion
systems-phenomena, it is not only one material movement
system-phenomenon, but it is given by
coagency of material motion systems-organisms of men and women, which
guarantees continuous reaction to collisions of particles of these
material motion systems-facts, when the approximation to the ideal
objective momentum-power can occur in the continuous process of gradual
reduction of greater or increase of lower momentum, energy-motion not to jump
through one decrease or increasing of momentum, virtually
energy-movement.
Birth
In every human
cell is stored genetic
information about human, whom it
belongs, it is a sort of idea, i.e. information about the conflict of
the material motion systems-phenomena, namely cloud of particles with
the downstream movement, momentum, virtually energy density (i.e.
momentum or energy per unit of volume) in the history of mankind and
their results in the form of solutions of changed momentum, energy
density-motion of particles.
It is the material motion system-fact of
low absolute (total) momentum-motion, power
represented by collided particles of these material motion
systems-phenomena. In other words, a person exposed to the struggle for
life with other living creatures represented by the particles
collisions in the form of collision of two organisms, consisting of
these particles, they were using the primitive tools, such as solutions
of these conflicts, and they stored the finding in
consciousness in the form of the model, namely the conflict of
particles but not in the form of all particles only of a few
particles, which had served as an image-pattern of conflict.
During the
development of the child before and partly after birth it is a repeat
of historical development through the implementation of the genetic
model through increase of
the absolute (total) momentum-motion, power through
the transformation of other material motion systems-phenomena
such as food on the material movement system-events corresponding to
the model (see the interpretation of models in this chapter, section
Model and idea). Food we use for cell division and specialization of
the organism cells in the mother's body under the genetic model i.e.
above collisions of particles deposited in the cell as a genetic model,
i.e. some particles from the collision.
Model, which is
carried in the mother's womb, is the result of conflicts of material
movement systems-sex cells, i.e. clouds of particles with a downstream
movement, momentum virtually energy density (i.e. momentum virtually
energy per unit of volume), where the merger will create a new material
movement system-embryo with the new arrangement of momentum, virtually
energy density-motion of particles,
which is a model for afuture new organism.
Implementation
of the model happens through cell
divisions, when by the abundance of cellular
food
it is increased absolute (total) momentum-motion, power of cell in
manner consistent with
transformation of material motion systems-facts of
food and fluids to the material motion system-phenomenon of
the cell. At the same time, in accordance with the model it leads to
cell division, which is materially provided by increased energy or
momentum of cell and it also reflects the model in the form of conflict
of material motion system-phenomena or of their particles of low
absolute (total) momentum, virtually energy-movement, namely the
conflict of parts of the cells with an excess of energy, virtually
momentum-movement.
The embryo is
so the model, which, like
the idea is the result of conflict of the material motion
systems-facts, gametes of two individuals. There is a combination of
inheritance model of two individuals. This combination, in most cases
is not random, it is the
result of a conflict of total material motion systems-facts, i.e. clouds of material (of a non-zero
mass) particles with the downstream movement, momentum,
virtually energy density of two individuals, which gave rise to their
relationship. Then the third kind
of material movement system-phenomenon composed of two individuals,
whose momentum virtually energy density-motion, power has been
changed and in conflict with surrounding material motion
systems-phenomena it was able to adapt and to persevere with their
balance of momentum-power without
breaking their relationship, which is also a preliminary base to
ensure, that the material movement system-child formed by association
of material motion systems-their gametes was stable and
responsive when it is exposed to conflict with
neighboring material motion systems-facts through the
collisions of particles ultimately of a zero weight. An example of such
a conflict is a conflict of immune system with disease carriers or
child nutrition in the mother's body, in all cases as a clash of moving
particles, ultimately of a zero weight.
Genetic
information in cell
is
through its history associated with a history of life on Earth and with
the planet Earth and with the entire Universe and whole Being, this is the idea,
which is part of a single
soul, a whole of Being, consisted of all tangible-material phenomena as
tangible ideas and of intangible phenomena as intangible ideas.
A man before his or her
birth is thus part of nature, of the whole
of pantheistic one God, of all Being, single
soul, where he
or she understands all the facts in the
form of fusion with the total as a continuum of all the ideas, hence
the zero-mass particles, photons continuous moving and still points of
space-time, space-time continuum and its sub-structures. This single
soul of particles of zero mass, space-time points forms a coherent and
harmonic whole, from which a person or other living creature is separated through his or her birth apparently,
because the
consciousness of this whole is hidden in his or her subconscious.
One perceives then consciously only the material world and its ideas.
The objective
of this retreat of an overall soul into the subconscious in the
material world it is, that man or other living creature were able to act in accordance with a single soul
of all Being, although from which he or she is apparently separated
and to transform the surface material world according to the pattern of their
memories into a single soul, into a single continuum of intangible
world consisted of particles of zero mass, continuous, moving and
motionless all the points of space-time that is coherent and harmonic,
which includes all the being which is God in my concept and in life of
man it is hidden in his or her subconscious. Thanks to movement in the
material world man increases their absolute momentum, increases
their material motion system involving progressively more and more
material motion sub-systems, their momentum relates and he or she also
increases their momentum, i.e. momentum density per unit of volume,
thus increasing their power of individuals,
that in line with the aim of being they are able to move with a minimum of collisions with other
subjects with their maximum sustainable momentum-power,
without they need
direct-conscious relationship with the total of all Being, God, direct consciousness of one soul.
One recognizes the self and determines the maximum power that can be
entrusted to him or her for the good of the whole without being under
direct control of the whole.
Model
and idea
Material
movement system-phenomenon is a cloud of material particles (of a
non-zero weight) with a related movement, momentum, virtually energy
density (or momentum. energy per unit of volume), with movement,
momentum density, which remains relatively stable in conflict with a
number of other material motion systems-facts of its surroundings, where a
change in material motion system-a phenomenon, which is due to
a collision with another material movement system-fact, it is then
corrected to the direction of the initial momentum, virtually
energy-density-movement through the conflict with another or other
material motion systems-phenomena, it is a model. The stable momentum
density-motion as an objective ideal momentum density-motion is
gradually extended through particles collisions to other material
motion systems-phenomena. This is the effect and spread of model
through the changes and expansion of material motion system-phenomenon
of model.
The above
mechanism for disseminating the material movement system is used
primarily in marriage, where
a stable momentum density-motion of material motion
systems-individuals of a married couple provides the extension in the
form of offspring, which persists during the conflict with the
surrounding phenomena-material motion systems, and not just for its
high absolute (total) momentum-motion, but its stability ensures its
establishment in the history of mankind.
Similarly,
although less perfect spread of momentum-movement is through the
inanimate models as ideas,
for which the guaranty of the dissemination
of ideas can be both a high absolute (overall) momentum-motion, power,
when a large number of people
takes
it, the guaranty of its effectiveness as a model is only, when this
concept guarantees a stable material and immaterial (made up of
particles of zero and non-zero weight) movement system-the idea of its
proponents in the conflict with other ideas such as motion
systems-phenomena. In other words, the idea can survive for long or
infinite time with increasing
knowledge of mankind and it can also spread as right.
A model
represents a material
movement
system-phenomenon possibly initially with low absolute (total)
momentum, virtually energy-motion
but the stable arrangement
of momentum, virtually energy density-motion
(i.e. momentum, virtually energy per unit of volume), which corresponds
to momentum, virtually energy-density as a result of collisions of the
range of material motion systems-facts and the continuous adjustment of
their mutual momentum, virtually energy density-motion through
collisions of particles. It is so concerned the
objective ideal
momentum density of material motion system, a
moving cloud of particles of nonzero mass, which means the movement
of material motion system
with
the maximum sustainable mobility, movement. In other words, ideas that
surpass time seemingly they respond to future human knowledge,
which at the time of the idea formation the people do not know yet.
Thought as a
model of material phenomena is motion tangible-material
or intangible system (consisting of
a cloud moving or inert particles with a positive or zero weight) with a
similar arrangement of movement, momentum
density (i.e. momentum per unit of volume), as it represented
a real phenomenon, but with
a much lower total momentum, virtually energy than
it has this real phenomenon. These ideas fulfill consciousness,
which combine each
other
through collisions of
particles forming the motion system. The
brain, virtually the soul is made up of individual brain cells-neurons,
each, of which represents a number of micro particles, ultimately
points of space-time and it is, therefore, able to model the real world
as a generalized whole or part (humans or other
living creature or inanimate fact) probably
through wave connection to the object through the senses, as
a general model of reality. In the case of
the brain it is a microcosm, the (possibly connected) image of the
macrocosm, of the actual Universe, which is formed in the course of
evolution. Strong links between neurons are strong links
between micro particles, the mass, free links between neurons are free
links between micro particles, the waves.
The above fixed
and free ties of brain cells are linked to the freedom of the
individual. Strong links of the brain cells
or complexes, instincts
are formed in my
opinion particularly by the killing of living creatures, the living
cells of the body of culprit expect revenge from the nearby colonies
of living cells of the killed cells of the victim
body in consequence, for example, they accumulate
fat reserves for worse days or to get fatter, they suffer
from greed, mental,
etc.illness, , they are stepping up the killing, suffering from
alcoholism, etc., or the various kinds of accidents happen
caused by the surroundings to the culprit. These complexes and instincts as a
follow-penalty restrict individual´s freedom in the
future, the freedom requires, that all links
of brain cells were free in all consecutive individual's decisions. Strength
of ties of brain cells, therefore, is almost causality, i.e. a movement
with a high probability of microparticles in the microworld, free bonds
of brain cells mean also the absence of such a high probability,
causality of microparticles motion in case of those decisions.
2.4 ABOUT KNOWLEDGE (gnoseology)
Introduction
Formation:
We discover the world through mind,
which we saturate through our senses.
The mind is good or bad,
what is its role of history?
Performance:
Mind is a complex agency,
result of simpler agencies,
coagency of goods and evils,
compound in some way.
Each mind is both good and evil
each is composed from subagencies,
from other subagencies it is different
and yet similar in complexity.
Minds of the individual people
are
contracoagency of all thinking
similar through their complexity,
termination, formation and performance agencies.
Mind is degree
of coagency,
result of agency evolution
similar through the number of its agencies,
able also to higher coagencies.
Similarity of
various minds
both through their agency number
and their subagency composition.
is manifested by a similar thought.
What is the total coagency
formed by
thinking of all people,
it is cooperation of the goods and
evils,
essentially eventually equilibrium.
Mind and all the thinking of each of the people
we call multiple coagencies.
What is perfect
mind,
which understands any sense?
Such mind includes
all the simpler agencies,
it is the totality of all individual agencies,
which belongs to omniscient God.
It is all single agencies
God in other words,
who knows everything,
otherwise formation of
every cocontraagency.
The human
limited mind is understanding
just material and thought
agencies,
but the infinite and omnipotent total
mind of God
dominates every more simple and complex agency.
Therefore God always sees
all good and evil agencies
in our human mind
in form of formation agency.
God also sees all
good and bad agencies in the world
in the mind of a son,
whether the Devil or Christ.
Where to find the material world,
who can tell us about it,
is truth hidden in the senses
or is it better to think.
Complex agency is the mind,
simpler it is human sense,
both contain simple agencies,
of which construction is so similar.
This building is tangible,
it is also a form of agency
with similar subagencies,
which objects of senses tend to have.
Therefore, it is also possible to say:
"properties
of matter, senses and mind
are with all agency units
to all these
coagencies own.
Eg. timescale is in mind,
however, the senses contain also it,
it is also hidden in a simple mass
in simpler or
more complex form.
Objectivity,
mind and emotions
belong to the whole of Being
as more
or less
similar and
numerous agencies.
Human emotion, mind and sense perceive faithfully
material
simpler agencies,
than it is,
because it
contains them in their agency structure.
Suprareasonable
supra-and sub-agencies
are accessible to the emotion,
through which we see complex
God,
in evil, good,
or whole.
So more complex agencies
of our human mind
are suprasensorial
coagencies,
postformation changes of material
subagencies
that the
material apriori sentences contain.
Link of all agency
is hidden in its overall unity
that our mind divides,
actually it accrues continuously.
Through senses we perceive simple agencies,
which are also called matter,
through mind also more complex coagencies,
revealing their complicated structure.
Sensorial
and
material perception
and with it
associated
all thinking
are the formation of the performance
cocontraagency,
other thinking its next performance and
termination.
Complex ideas of logic
and simple sensory perceptions
they are then formation agencies
of all human cocontraagency.
Formation of human contracoagency
proceeds from simple agencies
perceived by human senses
to the complex agencies of mind.
The mind and senses as agencies
are the cooperation of agency good and evil,
therefore, every idea is
right from Christ, wrong from the Devil.
Good and evil belong to the tangible existence
and between them a balance is always
therefore success and failure in reality
illuminate, which the idea is right.
In other words performance and termination
illuminate for each agency,
if for this agency the existent formation
is really in equilibrium.
In fact, Being
is everything cocontraagencies,
thus both good and bad,
the path to
equilibrium is right.
World as an
idea or a mass
According to
the Philosophy of Balance of social
sciences material world is
agency, according to the Philosophy of
Balance of the exact sciences material
world is ultimately the movement of particles of zero mass.
This movement in the material world, say of photons, space-time points
either of the speed of
light, or of a lower speed but in an infinite number,
here practically the transferability of weight for speed and vice versa demonstrates, it is the movement of certain
momentum or energy own to material objects.
As an example,
we can say, that both the atom and the electron or proton, as well as
man they are formed by the movement of particles of zero mass, by which
it is reached the quantity of momentum, virtually energy characteristic
to a certain object of inquiry.
Now to the
idea. Currently the system
of
storage on a magnetic medium is totally normal. What differs man from
such a car, it is his or her consciousness. According to the section
Life in the previous chapter awareness
was created on the chemical base through creating material motion systems-phenomena (i.e. a
cloud of particles of nonzero mass with the downstream movement,
momentum, virtually energy density),
which included the clashes of
material motion systems-phenomena in the history of mankind, both
individual source material movement systems-phenomena and changes in
material motion systems-phenomena that occurred after the clashes of
their particles.
What is the
consciousness record of material conflicts of motion systems in human
history? It is done
by creating, it can be said by microform of material motion systems-phenomena, virtually by using and deposit of collided
particles, when in the
consciousness a lived conflict can be
invoked at any time, virtually repeated in small. Consciousness is the
mechanism that is able to perceive even these mini-conflicts, which
initially took place in conflict of material motion systems-phenomena
of high absolute (overall) momentum and now they are taking place in
reduced form as a stored
material motion systems-phenomena with a similar organization, but of a low absolute
(total) momentum-motion, energy, power.
To revive the
idea it is always necessary to increase
the absolute (total) momentum-motion, power of conflict of motion systems-phenomena stored in the mind,
and it is through acts of man or the phenomena of nature. The condition
of consciousness is the storage of these motion systems-phenomena (i.e.
cloud of moving particles of zero and nonzero mass with the downstream
movement, momentum-momentum density per unit of volume) of low absolute
(total) momentum-movement in the mind of man in a chemical form,
virtually in the form of electrical impulses i.e. waves.
The process of
conscious thought takes place through
simulation of collisions
of deposited particles
of material motion systems-phenomena (clouds of moving particles of
nonzero mass with the downstream movement, momentum-momentum density
per unit of volume) between each other, when the
different particles of deposited material motion systems-phenomena and
the conflicts between them are
combined, man simulates in the mind a conflict of real
material motion systems-phenomena with much greater absolute (total)
momentum-motion, power, and thus he or she is better able to predict
the course of phenomena in the material world. In the process of unconscious thought then a man
understands and desires for unity, for God in the form
of
unconsciously connection of all zero mass particles, photons of a lower
speed than the speed of light, space-time points of only one intangible
movement system (continuous cloud of moving and inert particles of zero
mass, space-time points, the space-time continuum), which but one sees
only subconsciously, consciously one sees only surface as mass, light
and vacuum (absolute emptiness).
To the question
asked at the beginning of this chapter, if world is an idea or rather a mass,
the answer can be both, and both
are the movement of particles in the final result of the zero mass,
space-time points.
2.5 ABOUT RIGHT THINKING (logic)
Introduction
Thinking as the path to right knowledge
it is always in its agency good or bad
in the form of co-or contra- formation agency
but properly in
balanced clusters.
Method of
unbalanced thinking
either our mind or material simple agency
always reveals us,
if we proceed sensually.
Conclusions of simple agency
in complex ones the mind changes,
way is then the complexity of thought,
which is as simplicity in the matter.
Thinking, on the other hand,
it could not devise a simple agency,
but only the complexity it grabs,
which the simplicity is remote.
A
/ supracoagencies of mind:
1. Judgments
1.1 positive judgment-
coagency and contracontraagency
1.2 negative judgment-
contraagency or contracoagency
1.3 general and partial, and unique judgments-
supraagency and subagency
1.4 judgments, which reveal what is-
performance agency
1.5 judgments, which reveal that something
is necessarily - performance agency of formation supraagency
1.6 judgments, which make a mere possibility-
performance agency of formation
subagency
2. Opinions
2.1 syllogism- subagency
of
subagencies supracoagency (assumptions-subagency
and supracoagency,
conclusion-subagency)
3. Evidence
3.1 contention principle
(the same cannot be simultaneously in the same respect and not to be) -
coagency and
contraagency
3.2 principle of identity
(A = A) - same agency composed of the same subagencies
3.3 principle of excluded third
(between being and non-being of same explicit material relation is
nothing third) -
co-and
contra-agency
3.4 principle of sufficient reason- of formation subagencies of certain agency
4. Wrong thinking -
contraagency
B / subagencies
of senses and supraagencies
of
the mind
1. induction opinion (factual validity of the sentence
for cases falling under it) - formation supracoagency of
subcocontraagencies
2. deductions opinion
(derivation
of the special from general) -
subagency of formation supracoagency
C / summaries
of mind supraagencies
co-,
contra-supra-same-, sub-, formation, performance, termination agency
Philosophy of
language
Philosophical
school of neopositivism
sees
a major role in the philosophy
in the development of language, which
would unify all the sciences, both natural sciences and social
sciences. In my opinion, I have found this language in the so-called
agency analysis of the Philosophy of Balance.
This language
is based on the origin of
language, i.e. from its historical roots
and it returns to such long-forgotten concepts that are the meaningful
progenitors of today's words.
These are the general words,
i.e. there are only a few such
words, as well as our
ancestors had no extensive vocabulary and they did with a few words to describe the reality of whole agency.
If we reduce these words on the general meaning, we find, that even
though there are 11, and in fact they represent only three, virtually
one concept.
With this most
general language, let us call it the agency language, and with
subsequent agency analysis I analyzed
the social sciences and natural sciences,
which enabled me to find interesting vertical, i.e. in the context of
general and specific scientific disciplines, and horizontal, within one
scientific discipline, relations, what is the origin of words, but also
of the facts, which they means.
By horizontal relations I mean in the
contexts of the scientific disciplines, it seems hardly related
concepts. By vertical
relations I mean the context of seemingly
unrelated concepts from different scientific disciplines.
Chosen words
are general terms, therefore they include a large number of partial words and facts.
This terminology is the base of simpler words and facts, but given the
general concepts it is concerned the conceptual understanding of the
world, which is apparently easier than conceptual understanding of the
world built on special scientific disciplines.
According to
the Philosophy of Balance of language all
the facts were originally labeled by one
word, for which I chose under the general
philosophical knowledge the concept
agency. This agency can be distinguished on
the base of basic logical links, as it seems, that our ancestors did at
the time of the language formation, i.e. total and single, co- and contra-, supra-, sub- and
the same formation, performance and termination agency.
This means all being is done, i.e. any
fact can be understood as a process that can be broken down by reason
on the processes that are characterized by certain properties arising
from their relationship to other processes in the reality. An
example of coagency
is
the atom, the chemical element or substance and the judicial process.
Being virtually the reality is happening as the folding and
degradation, thus as co- and
contra-agency, coagency as a
(also partial) whole of
agency, virtually process within the process of reality composed of
other processes, contraagency in contrast, a reverse process, which
leads to decomposition virtually destruction of complex (even
partial) processes of the whole process at the sub-units of
processes. Coagency an example is the formation, folding, atom, state,
the example of contraagency is the destruction, degradation, disease,
explosion, etc. Composition and decomposition is in equilibrium,
therefore, regards the composition and decomposition it is superior supraagency. Example of
supragency of contraagency of explosion and of
coagency of origin of a star is the Universe, birth and death
is a creature, person, etc. The nature of being as an agency implies,
that it can be divided into developmental level formation, performance and termination agency, which
arises from the law of cause and effect, each process has reasonably
the reason or cause of emergence, i.e. the formation, course of
performance and result that is termination, which also causes the
formation of another process of reality. Examples of the formation
agency of automobile accident is the increased speed, slippery roads,
oncoming vehicle, drink driving, an example of the performance agency
is spinning out, failing to control, overrunning in the opposite lane,
an example of the termination agency is collision of vehicles, causing
damage to vehicles, etc. and causing injury, or possibly death of
carried persons. From the nature of agency as co-and
contra-agency it follows the distinction on total and unit agency
that is a reality as the process or the overall agency and the smallest
in the process of reality as a single agency. Examples of total agency
there is Being and not Being together, the Universe and also in my
concept the God, the example of atom as unit has been done, now it can
be a proton and an electron, in my concept the unit agency is a
fictional process in reality, because each process is also divisible.
With this resolution it is directly linked the fact of supra, the same and sub-agency,
supraagency is the complex process consisted within the reality, which
includes sub-processes, subagencies, a process virtually identical with
another process of reality is the same agency. An example of
supraagency is atom, of subagency the electron, proton, etc.,
and then of supraagency a
trial
and of subagency the magistrates in
this process, an example of sameagencies may be different electron and
proton or an atom of the same element in the same condition. Total, single, co-, contra-supra-same-, sub,
formation, performance and termination agency
embodies
according to the Philosophy of Balance each existing fact.
Formation,
performance and termination agency concepts are chosen for the same
content of letters in the
Czech root of the word, they are the letters "N" and "K",
letters which are very similar to those, that occur in the root of the
word "something" and "nothing". These concepts I formulated originally
in English as "formation", which means the origin or creation,
"performance", which means execution and "termination", which means the
end, the root is also composed of the same letter "R" and "M“.
There are 11
concepts, but they are the concepts, that are related
to each other as general and specific concept. Agency analysis
concepts as sub,
termination, same may be replaced according to a situation by the term
contraagency and concepts as formation, supra, the same, performance can be
replaced according to a situation by the notion coagency.
One may be talking
about limited conceptual
analysis.
Contraagency indicates
degradation or destruction, and essentially it includes words such as
subagency, a division into the part and termination agency, namely the
disappearance of an agency, it may include the same agency, if
contraagency. Furthermore, concerning coagency or the
composition or formation, which comprises supraagency, a composition in
a higher unity, and formation and performance agency, namely the
initiation and continuation of a folding of a certain agency, and it
may include sameagency if coagency.
Now I will give
a few examples of analysis:
Example No.1
Mathematics:
a.) contraagency
subtraction,
division, radical
b.) coagency
addition,
multiplication, exponentiation
Horizontal link: In all cases
ad.a) it is concerned the reduction of numbers, i.e. operations in the
history emerging gradually with increasing knowledge of larger numbers.
Reverse is ad.b).
Vertical link: During the
war there is destruction of property, the war is so an investment of
funds intended for the destruction of life, health and property of
citizens, subtraction, virtually reducing social values ad.a).
Conversely ad.b) for mutually beneficial trade.
Example No.2
a) 1 +1 = 2
b) 2-1 = 1
Horizontal link: From the
above we see, that the opposite (inverse) agency can be seen as
coagency ad.a) at first and contraagency ad.b) secondly.
Vertical link: Disruptive
contraagency ad.b) and compositional coagency ad.a) are the cycle in
our world.
Further the
examples of text analysis will
follow from the perspective of the overall and limited agency
analysis.
Example No.3
a) Agency’s overall analysis
Philosophy
(coagency) of Balance (supraagency) is (coagency) built (formation
agency) on (supraagency) several (coagency) basic (suprasubagency)
axioms (supraagency), it (coagency) is (same agency) basic
(suprasubagency) assumptions (formation agency).
b) Agency’s limited analysis
Philosophy
(coagency) of Balance (cocontraagency) is (coagency) built (coagency)
on (coagency) several (coagency) basic (cocontraagency) axioms
(coagency), it (coagency) is (coagency) basic (cocontraagency)
assumptions (coagency).
In addition to
examples from the philosophy it can be used for example of agency
terminology and subsequent agency analysis also the terms in the field of exact sciences, particularly physics.
Example No.4
a) Agency’s overall analysis
Kinetic
(cocontraagency) theory (formation agency) of substances (coagency) is
the theory (formation agency), which (subagency) clarifies (formation
agency) structure (coagency) and properties (subagency) of substances
(coagency) through the movement (cocontraagency) and (coagency) mutual
(coagency) action (performance agency) of atoms (single agency,
virtually coagency), molecules (coagency) and ions (contra- or
coagency), from (subagency) which (coagency) the substances (coagency)
are consisted (coagency) .
b) Agency’s limited analysis
Kinetic
(contracoagency) theory (coagency) is (coagency) the theory (coagency),
which (coagency) clarifies
(coagency)
structure (coagency) and properties (coagency) of substances (coagency)
through movement (contracoagency) and mutual (coagency) action (co or
contra agency) of atoms (coagency) molecules (coagency) and ions (co-
or contra- agency) from (contraagency) which (coagency)
substances (coagency) are consisted (coagency).
2.6 HOW TO LIVE
(ETHICS)
Introduction
Formation:
My mind asks,
how man must live,
to feel happy,
to have peace of mind.
Performance:
Being is in
balance,
good and equally bad,
let us approach to this agency,
the eternal
natural harmony.
When you want the peace of mind,
you must stay in the middle
to love good now,
but as well as evil.
In the confusion of being processes
the agreement between them
was closed forever
and it brought the harmony.
If I want to live in peace,
inner harmony to cherish,
then I must
not side,
evil also good
to reconcile.
Good is real,
when I decide impartially,
when it seeks the balance
both of the evil and the good.
Where is the true center
of all evil and good agencies,
it is to find the way,
where is least
resistance.
That journey cannot be waived,
if you want to live in peace,
internal and external peace
in your being still experiencing.
Otherwise you do not
finish the curse
in your being confused,
that is constantly going
the evil laughs to the good.
But also the good wins
and it always defeats the evil,
finally, in the space peace
they diverge without losers and winners.
Whose side to
take part,
whose sword I should draw,
when the good wins the moment
or when the
evil beats it.
That is the contradiction of human existence,
if we follow the path of sacrifice
or to use our power
to beat the weak.
It is necessary to know it
and in the life to test,
none of these ways
is quiet.
Goodness is
always followed by
the evil
evil again
calls for the good,
peace is not found within us
so,
it needs to wait for war.
No choice but to sacrifice
for good thing
or for evil yet
personally to bring.
What it has been changed,
the evil but also the good
escaped unscathed,
not diminished.
If I do not find the gold center,
if I do not go the quiet path
it is inevitably good or evil battle,
however, the
overall harmony I do not limit.
Even without my unnecessary struggle
from being power
infinite space harmony comes again,
however, the soul does not escape the pain.
Balanced
behavior
however multiple
is not good or bad,
but it is balanced.
Against excessive evil
it is resisting in the good,
against excessive good
on the other hand in the evil.
Against balanced behavior
only exaggerated evil
or excessive good
in significant extent they always fight.
Equilibrium actions
are essentially the formations,
which in total supracoagency
conciliate
all
the good and evil.
Balanced behavior
partially accepts
and partially denies
the evil and also the good in the agency.
If I say it again, in other words,
the good or evil in the agency
through partial contra- or co-agency
still it conciliates each with other.
Necessary decency to good and evil
it does not mean, that I reject war,
if it is concerned cocontraagency gold center,
I must be ready to fight now.
To find
center of various actions,
i.e. the contract between good and evil,
it cannot be just thought,
but suprareasonable emotion is
necessary.
The mind sees only a simpler world,
to which the emotion can also look at,
emotional cocontracoagency
attains heavenly spheres.
The
gold center of all
is true only a moment then,
the reconciliation of early processes
should always be found again.
Therefore various
communities of people
this center
depending
to their
customs they see,
also under certain circumstances.
Those circumstances are different
but also similar
always in a specific action situation
but in the overall unity in the agency.
Agencies are good or bad,
bad action is
predetermined,
all partial is good and also bad
thus partly determined.
Thanks to good formation coagency
an evil man may also reach the harmony,
thanks to evil and
destructive formation agency
a good man may fail also to the evil.
Within the good and evil formation
agency
predetermined conditions are also included,
mind imitates the God´s
whole,
and it reaches the overall balance.
Thinking is strongly determined
by tangible sensations, its organization,
however if it performed in agency,
it must be partially random.
Formation
agency performance
is so a separate agency,
which is only partially given,
based on its formation.
God´s agency of agency whole is
unlimited in its formation
by other external agencies,
which everything is sharing.
The emergence of God's total agency
thus then it is completely unrestricted,
it is not any supra-or sub-agency
which even a partial performance limits it.
Total
independence of God coagency
each agency contains in its
individual formation,
therefore, also
partially in itself.
as part of the unlimited whole.
Free human will,
so shapes our human action,
which only partially
is predetermined by other agencies.
What is probably given
to the good or also evil agency,
it is the existent harmon,
which
will
be performed in time.
Ethics
A material
world is represented by material motion systems-events (clouds of
particles of nonzero mass with the downstream momentum
virtually energy density-movement),
which intersect in the form of their particles, ultimately of zero mass,
it is to correct momentum, virtually energy density-movement of
material motion systems-phenomena toward momentum, virtually energy
density-movement of other material movement system-phenomenon. Intangible world,
i.e. of a movement and immobility of particles of zero mass is in
equilibrium, then it is a
harmonic continuum, where the density momentum-movement is either the
same or it decreases or it increases continuously, which follows from
the fact, that this world is continuous, there are
only zero-mass particles, space-time points, which it
completes and which touch one another and they continuously transmit
the existing movement from one space-time point to another. Material
world, where speed and mass of particles is a non-zero, but it is disharmonic unlike the
continuum-linked world of movement of particles of zero mass, thus the
net movement or waves. Material
world of our dimension is directed
towards this equilibrium evolutionarily (see section
God and music chapter 2.8 About beautiful (aesthetics)).
From the
perspective of philosophy of exact sciences they are the unlimited evil and the good in the material
world of the particles with more or less momentum, than the
objective ideal momentum-motion is, which
is at a certain time an equilibrium behavior due to the evil
and good. It is a momentum, when particles
of non-zero mass can move with maximum sustained momentum-motion with a
minimum of collisions with other particles
that is the maximum sustainable power of man, which raises in the long
term the least resistance. It is the largest sustainable movement
system with a minimum of collisions between particles and particles of
other motion systems. It is the largest sustainable peaceful society.
Man as well as other material motion systems but they tend to move with subjective ideal momentum-motion, i.e. the momentum
that raises in terms of internal organization of movement
system the least pain and resistance, it is a short-term sustainable
minimum of collisions of particles of surroundings of so moving
movement system or a short-term sustainable maximum of motion system,
e.g. as far as the society is hold by violence, which then
disintegrates into civil war. The unlimited evil and
good are
momentum different from
that objective ideal momentum-motion at a particular time, which is the
maximum sustainable good and minimum sustainable evil.
Man is a part of the overall movement and the
motion can take short-term, depending on collided motion systems also
the different momentum-movement from the objective
ideal momentum-motion, one must accept the above-defined short-term evil and also
as well as the good, otherwise he or she
would have act against the principle of movement as a phenomenon and
thus against their own nature.
If a man wants
to achieve a balance, a harmony and unison of the intangible world of
the movement and immobility of particles of zero mass, they must adapt
to the fact of the existence of higher and lower momentum-motion than
their ideal objective momentum-movement, a metaphorically speaking to reconcile the good and evil, thus
to create a system, that in the above properties of movement
during the trend to changes of momentum density-movement
beyond its existence interval of the downstream movement, momentum
density (momentum per unit of volume) of material particles of positive
mass (the threat of death) will seek the maximum good and minimum evil
in a given time, which is sustainable, i.e. the maximum power,
movement, virtually momentum-motion sustainable over time. The opposite
is the excessive evil and good, when the excessive power of the good as
the maximum power virtually momentum is not sustainable and it is
substituted by reducing the power of man, family, country and humanity,
i.e. by the exaggerated evil, i.e., less motion, momentum, power of
motion system, than it is a sustainable biggest movement system. The
subject is not ready to take over the power-mobility, for the increase
in movement system, he or she does not know how to deal with it and
this power leads to mutual damages, wars, or dispute.
Efforts should
be made to create motion system-reality, where all particles with their
momentum- movement are related and they create maximum sustainable
material motion system, a cloud of particles of nonzero mass, where the
material particles move with their sustainable maximum
momentum-movement with minimum collisions with other particles, which would move their
momentum out of their objective ideal momentum-motion. The aim of the change of the material world is its
continuity and consistency of all the material world,
it can be said musicality, where the momentum movement-power will change continuously rather
than jumping, it will be related to each other.
In this sense,
man should also behave as a material movement system-fact in
order to be read by others. Not to change or to seek to change their
momentum-motion, power in a collision with the motion
system-another phenomenon through leaps at once, but gradually with the
other continuous material motion system-facts, that he or she move
within his or her existential interval of momentum-movement and timely
they recognized, that they exceed its limits, therefore his or her risk
of death. Therefore, also in terms of man as a movement
system-reality a belief is important, that in conflicts
with material motion systems-phenomena he or she kept
continuously, or that his or her surroundings did not expect from him
or her the behavior, virtually a change of momentum-movement, which
they would be deviated from their objective ideal momentum over time, a
timely sustainable momentum-motion, power. In other words, it is
necessary to approach our
maximum sustainable momentum-motion, power gradually, continuously, not
through leaps, because each approach must be sustainable.
Unlimited
atonement of the evil with the good is, I have stated, the change of
absolute (total) momentum-motion, power of material motion
systems
currently beyond our existence
interval-life in the form of idea or design, which we should gradually
approach (See section Model and idea of chapter 2.3 About basis of
being (ontology) and section Reconciliation of good and evil in
this chapter), this reconciliation is going, that in
the scale of related momentums- movements, powers this unrestricted
momentum-movement is so too remote, that the material movement
system-subject, fact incompatible with any
other material motion systems-facts, the subjects can
perceive only in
the form of design or idea. Man is to act in equilibrium way, i.e. That
their agency, i.e.
collisions of their particles and the surrounding motion systems-facts
it would oscillate around
their objective ideal momentum-motion at a specific time (i.e. maximum
sustainable momentum virtually movement in time)
depending on it, of which material motion
systems they are
collided, either those that reduce or increase their momentum-motion
and they would not get out of their existential interval of
momentum-motion (i.e. to die), if it is contrary to his or
her objective ideal momentum-moving.
This equilibrium agency is inconsistent with both the
exaggerated good and exaggerated evil, in
other words, the discontinuous, discrete acts, which are for
surrounding illegible and incomprehensible, when a man is approaching
their perfect objective ideal momentum-movement through jumps
without followed by their surrounding, which do not understand
it. This disjointed agency often means for the material movement
system-the fact such as a person approximation to the limits of
subsistence interval of momentum (momentum, movement
of material motion system
ceases
to follow)-movement, namely death or it exceeds. Man
so unnecessary suffers and he or she destroys consistency,
which he or she has achieved or it was achieved, i.e. the maximum
momentum-power of the surrounding motion systems-facts with a
minimum of conflicts. Characteristic of the objective ideal momentum,
movement is the maximum sustainable momentum-motion, power, at a given
point in time, thus depending on the state of its surrounding, i.e.
mainly on live material motion systems-individuals.
In a sharp
dispute a man as material movement system will be, if during the
alignment of the material world he or she comes into contact with such different live material motion system-civilization, that adapting to its momentum-power
it would mean deviation outside their existence interval of
momentum-motion, power, i.e. death, contrary to the objective ideal
momentum-motion, power of the certain material-motion system of an
individual in a given point in time, i.e. unethical death. Any such a
deviation will destroy the reached harmony of material motion
systems-facts as well as causing immense mental anguish of the material
motion system of this
subject. Also this conflict leads ultimately to the strict enforcement
of the objective ideal momentum-movement power in the material world,
and to the good, through the conflict of particles the
absolute (total) momentum-power is increased in this so
different material motion system-individual, it is to talk
about the spread of civilization through the war of cultures.
In other words, a clash of particles of two material movement systems,
clouds of particles with nonzero mass and downstream movement-momentum,
this will reduce both material motion systems, which the momentum may
stop to follow, in part or in whole of this both already existing
material movement systems, but the conflict is always directed
ultimately to the formation of a single material movement system of the
both material movement systems, a single cloud of particles with
nonzero mass of the downstream movement, momentum, and always through
the collisions of material particles.
For the
knowledge of objective ideal
momentum, i.e. the maximum sustainable power at a given moment in time,
virtually momentum-power of man as a
material movement system the reason is not enough, also the
experience of
conflict with other material motion systems-facts is nescessary, the
longer is this experience, the better understanding of themselves as
material movement systems-the facts a man can get, that are also to
align with other material motion systems-facts.
Human behavior
is partly predetermined, because it is given mathematically probable
rather than sure amount of momentum
density-movement
i.e. momentum per unit of volume of particles of their material
movement system-body as well as of any material motion sub-system-organ, tissue, cells that form the
body of a man during a collision of these particles with
other material motion systems-facts, virtually their
particles. Man is also a semi-free, which arises from the freedom of
particles of zero mass-of points of space-time, photons, which
form a single harmonic unit in a single motion system of all
points of space-time. For these particles according to quantum physics
the probability can be only
determined, that they will occur in a particular place, no phenomenon
in the physical world is sure only more or less probable. From these
particles, ultimately of a zero-weight, space-time points it is then
composed each organism virtually every thing as material
movement system, a cloud of particles of nonzero mass and of related
momentum in the material world. Human brain as a model of
whole reality of the movement of all micro particles in the micro world
through freer and stronger connections of neurons, as the ability of
live material movement systems-creatures to adapt their
material movement system-organism to other material motion
systems-facts through increasing of an existential interval of
momentum-movement, power through the emergence of greater material
movement system, it allows to use an improbable possibility in
the outside world by selecting the material motion systems-facts, which
are to confront. The will of man is to some extent free.
Good
Each body as a material motion system of particles of
non-zero mass is composed of material
motion sub-systems-organs, tissues, cells, which in the body coexist
and collaborate. Each of these material motion systems can be
characterized threefold value of
average momentum density-motion,
i.e. momentum per unit of volume, firstly it is
a momentum density-motion, power, which is ideal for the movement system, secondly it
is the smallest
momentum density-motion, when this
organism is still alive, the third it is the highest momentum density-motion, when this
organism still survives. In the exceeding of the two latter momentum
densities body decays and its death, and thus
it interrupts the downstream movement, momentum of material
particles of these material movement systems.
Human and other
organisms are constantly exposed to the
collision with particles of a non-zero mass
of surrounding material motion systems-facts, i.e. clouds of particles
with a downstream movement, momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of
volume, either upward or downward movement, the momentum of a
particular organism as a material movement system or identical with it.
Therefore, the body tries consciously and unconsciously to maintain its ideal motion, momentum, virtually
momentum density, i.e. the maximum sustainable momentum-motion with a
minimum of collisions with other material particles or their material
motion systems, that it
corrects the effect of changes of conflict with the surrounding
material motion systems-facts, through the return to the original ideal
movement, momentum density searching the conflict with the material
motion systems-facts. An example might be the sun drying the body,
which is initially to an increase in mobility, momentum density, i.e.
momentum per unit of volume, of material motion system of human body
through rays of the sun and the consequent deadly threat of reduction of movement, momentum
density of material movement system of the organism, which is
consciously and unconsciously, because feeling of thirsty, looking
movement system of water and cold, which again reduces the movement
momentum density of material movement system-body.
Ideal
momentum-motion can be divided into subjective and objective ideal
momentum. Subjective ideal
momentum-motion, power is often in terms
of short-term in conflict with the subjective ideal momentum-motion
power of other material motion systems-facts, which applies both inside
the human body in relation to the material motion sub-systems-organs,
tissues, cells and outside of the organism, e.g. in relation to other
organisms or due to nature. It can therefore be distinguished in terms
of short-term the good of the particular material movement
system-individual and good of the whole. The subjective ideal momentum
of body is a movement without any restriction, which is governed only
by collisions of particles of internal material movement systems of the
body-organs, tissues, cells, such as the movement of an organism that
does not feel any mental limitations and it feels completely satisfied
with this movement, it is often short-term rise up to a maximally large
material motion system with discontinuous motion, momentum by violence,
but which in the longer term breaks in the inner pain.
This subjective
ideal-momentum motion, however, collides within the whole with a
subjective ideal momentum-motion of other material motion
systems-individuals and facts outside the body and hence over time it
is mental suffering, which prevents natural movement of the individual.
However, the situation is different in
terms of long-term, when the subjective ideal-motion momentum is still
closer to the ideal objective-motion momentum,
in terms of Philosophy of Balance it leads to fusion of subjective and
objective reality, namely partial and total material facts, when man
feels themselves as one with other people and then the living beings. Objective ideal momentum-motion
means, that in the long-term the organism feels a minimum necessary
suffering, it is in the lowest collisions with other motion systems,
other individuals. In terms of philosophy of the exact sciences this
objective ideal momentum can be
characterized as the continued
maximum possible momentum-motion, power of movement
system-individual-fact with a minimum of collisions with other motion
systems-individuals, the facts that is ideally from the law of
conservation of momentum and energy the movement with almost
constant value of momentum and energy, as the emergence of a single
motion system in the material world, i.e. a cloud of material
particles
with continuous motion, momentum. Being closer to the perfect objective
ideal momentum, it shall also be sustainable. Subjective ideal momentum-motion, power
means the same thing in the short term but only in the short term.
Example of this
ideal objective momentum is the treatment of homeless, it
is not possible to provide them with free resources, which other people
have to earn by the work,
while it is not possible, that they die of hunger or cold, which is
the example of the
inconsistency of the subjective ideal momentum-power, which
must be limited in the interest of the ideal objective momentum-power
to blend in the future with subjective ideal momentum-power, or in
permanent terms even the homeless should be members of society
(in the words of the Constitution of the Czech Republic, each has the
right to life). Another example is intervention
trial of dictator, when his or her
government could mean smaller losses of population than the
intervention, and also in long terms so it can correspond, despite its obvious unfairness,
better to the objective ideal momentum-sustainable power in a
given time than intervention. It always depends on whether the
environment, in which there is a dictatorship, it is not so disruptive
to its members, that security can only be a dictatorship, which is an
example of an approximation to the objective ideal momentum-power as
the result of inconsistent subjective ideal momentums-powers of members
of society.
Evil
Each organism
is a material movement system, a cloud of particles of nonzero mass
with continuous momentum density-motion, i.e. momentum per unit of
volume, which touch, so they transmit their momentum-motion, and it
applies the law of conservation of momentum, virtually energy. Each
organism has also its own subjective ideal and objective ideal momentum and minimum and maximum
momentum-motion, in which it still survives. The Philosophy of Balance
of the exact sciences shows
nature
of the dimension of the speed of light, virtually electromagnetic
waves, i.e. other parallel space, which is to our material world, in
proportion as the two layers of three-dimensional space, as a
dimension, where particles are moving with the speed of light, and they
have zero length, time and weight.
Dimension of
the speed of light,
virtually
electromagnetic waves and of absolute
vacuum so they act in our dimension through the constant speeding up
its particles in the form of conversion of light into matter, if the
speed of light photons are absorbed by the mass, and vice versa,
converting mass into light-emitting photons, when motion
systems-facts
of these particles come out of their momentum interval, continuous
motion, momentum and they die or they affect destructively other material motion system-facts, which momentum-motion, they
reduce below their minimum existential values of
momentum density, i.e. movement, the momentum per unit of volume, which
follows. Dimension
of the speed of light has but also positive
effects on the motion systems of our dimension, because they
are to adapt to this situation, therefore, increase their maximum
momentum-motion, power and to achieve their maximum sustained momentum-motion
with minimal clashes with other motion systems-facts, virtually the particles.
This can be compared to the constant need for continuous adaptation to
the movement between our dimension and another of the speed of light,
which allow this movement, virtually it causes, that our dimension or
material world gained form of the perfect world-the
only material motion system-reality, a cloud of particles of nonzero
mass with the downstream movement, momentum, where all the living
organisms move with the maximum sustainable momentum-motion with a
minimum of collisions with other material motion systems-individuals or
facts or their particles. This requires the adaptation of any part of
the material world to this momentum-movement, virtually maximum
sustainable momentum-movement with minimal clashes with other material
motion systems-individuals-facts, according to the law of the
conservation of momentum, virtually energy.
In terms of
mathematics as a general model of conflict of material motion
systems-facts (see chapter Model and idea) they correspond to this
movement the compositional and decomposition mathematical operations
with positive and negative numbers, inequalities, subtraction, division
and radical, virtually addition, multiplication and exponentiation,
i.e. models virtually ideas that are in motion as the movement between
the light and our dimension.
In biology,
this movement, virtually clash of different material motion systems of
our and the dimension of light, virtually electromagnetic waves is
reflected in the form of autotrophic organisms that consume inorganic
substances or in the latter case, heterotrophic organisms that feed on
organic substances, mainly other organisms. Again, there is a
contradiction between destruction and formation of the material
movement systems, a move that has the beginning in moving between the
light and our dimension. Furthermore, in the evolutionary development
of more advanced organisms.
Similarly,
there is a movement of ideas as patterns that are inconsistent,
destructive and creative that has more or less momentum than the
existence interval of momentum density-motion, power of the material
movement system-individual, the fact or their ideal momentum-movement
power in a given time.
Our material
dimension, dimension of complex other matter (of higher speed than the
speed of light), dimension of the absolute vacuum and light dimension
(see Chapter VII.)
Physical theory of relativistic energy ) are not
separated, their intersection is the light, in which the energy is
inherent. By radiation or by burning of the material
or absorbing the light, virtually photons by mass it
is a constant two-way flow
of energy, virtually their mutual
conversion.
This means,
that the evil in the form of decay of material motion systems-facts is
always well balanced in the form of the formation of new material
motion systems-facts with an unchanged value of the total energy of our
dimension, the dimension of the absolute vacuum and light dimension,
but in a constant transformation, or cycle.
Therefore, in
philosophy, there are guidelines that favor the good over the evil or
vice versa the evil over the good. In religion we are talking about the personification of the
good and evil. The political philosophy of government, there is a
single dictator and a wider group, virtually democracy. Law may be
the
dictate of an individual, it may also be a social contract of all
members of society it may accept corporal punishment including the
death penalty, where it would be appropriate a prison with the
possibility of conditional release for a prisoner, who prove
to be correct. In the policy it may be accepted a person
equally with any other person or it may be accepted one differently
from one another, and as rich from the poor, and in childhood, i.e.
from the beginning with the consequences for all the life. Social
behavior may have the nature of violence or contract with a minimum or
necessary educational element of compulsion. Similarly, chess and other
games can be played offensively or defensively with mirror repeating of
not defensive moves.
But the evil
also means reduction of the
momentum-movement beyond existential value of momentum density-movement
of live material motion system-the individual -e.g.
freezing of organism or cooling the planet under the threshold
necessary for life or killing of living creature, In accordance with
the law of conservation of energy, virtually momentum the evil is
always caused by the decrease in momentum density-motion, power of material motion
system-fact by destructive vacuum, that it is true of it, what is true
about the increasing in momentum
density-motion,
power over the existential limit of momentum density-movement,
and also due to the movement-energy exchange between our and synthetic
light dimension.
Reconciliation
of good and evil
What way leads
out of this movement
between our material, vacuum and light dimension associated with a flow of energy in
and out, virtually increasing and decreasing of the
momentum-motion. Then the
constant change of the world over time, which can be likened to an
unguided missile, when we do not know, if the world will change for
better or worse than the current world.
The way is to
create a scale of material motion systems-facts, namely clouds
of material and moving particles with the downstream momentum and
positive mass, that each material
motion system might move with permanently maximum possible
momentum-motion, power with minimal collisions with other particles
(dynamic equilibrium)
thereby achieving according to the law of conservation of energy and
momentum continuously perfect state. No live material movement system
will be removed from this scale, only the reduction of its absolute
(total) momentum-motion, power, as much as to ensure lasting maximum
momentum-power of all other material motion systems-facts in a whole.
In other words,
if we are at the net movement of particles of zero mass, virtually of
clean energy, we create a similar harmonic scale of all these material
motion systems, as it is
this movement and immobility of particles of zero mass,
all points of space-time,
which do not collide due to their zero mass (see the two intersecting
beams of light).
The largest
absolute (total) momentum, i.e. the
movement, power the material movement systems-individuals acquire, who
are able to continuous movement of this high
momentum-motion,
power, without colliding with other particles, virtually material
motion systems-individuals, and without causing so the extinction of
these material motion systems-individuals. In other words, they secure
the existence of all other living material movement
systems-individuals. The
smallest absolute (total) momentum-motion, power
will obtain the material movement systems-individuals which collide
with higher absolute (global) momentum-motion with surrounding
particles, virtually material motion systems-the individuals and they
cause so their deviation from the ideal objective momentum-motion,
power, i.e. from the maximum sustained momentum-motion, power without
collisions with particles of other material movement
systems-individuals.
If all existing
material movement systems, i.e. clouds of material (of a non-zero mass)
and moving particles with downstream movement, momentum, or any
material facts, with the maximum sustainable momentum they move with a
minimum of collisions with other particles or material motion systems,
then it arises only one
material motion system including all the material reality formed by
material particles with the downstream movement, momentum, thus a
single Being consisting of everybody and everything.
This
consistency, however does
not guarantee to any motion systems-individuals
the subjective ideal momentum-motion,
i.e. the maximum momentum-movement of internal motion
sub-systems-components, regardless of collision with external motion
systems-subjects except the
whole material motion system-reality, with which
over time so all movement sub-systems-subjects and facts become
identified. None of the
living material motion systems-individuals will not be destroyed,
i.e. their density momentum-motion, power does not exceed the momentum,
motion existence interval of the downstream movement, momentum. All
living material movement systems-individuals will thus be limited in
favor of a whole which is a guarantee, which will be in
turn granted to each of the live-material motion
systems-individuals.
If it is not
objectively possible to achieve this harmony of living material
movement systems-individuals without the loss of some live material motion system-the individual, it is
possible to admit their loss, but
the least extent possible, that we can accept e.g. a dictatorship, life
imprisonment for irreparable murderer or corporal punishment except the
death penalty, unless we can provide them the imprisonment, but only
gradually in the cases of
needed defense and extreme emergency with respect
to the principle of subsidiarity, i.e. irreversibility,
and proportionality that is less than imminent evil.
This means, that rich
people have to economize in favor of the poor, but to the extent
necessary to ensure their survival, if they acquired wealth in honest
manner. The killer should be jailed, pending with probability
bordering on certainty he or she is right and not dangerous, even after
they are not to be released at once, but they must be subject to
restrictions diminished gradually, until they will work in increasingly
free conditions. At the same time if they are right and that under
their objective possibilities they provide damages, the society should
not look at them as a former murderer, but it should give them a chance
to move up in society.
There are
societies, which, because of the hazards of their members, call
themselves for a dictatorship instead of democracy, where only a
dictator can ensure the highest degree of relative safety to their
members. In such a society after the fall of the dictatorship we cannot
condemn a dictator, who has acted and did not exceed the limits of
legitimate self-defense and extreme emergency, while the dictator
should be added as a mitigating circumstance, that he or she has
provided security in society. At the same time it is not possible to
keep the dictatorship, if the risk of legitimate self-defense
and extreme emergencies ceases to exist, if the members of society civilize so much,
they are no longer dangerous to each other. In this case, a
reasonable dictator should resign him- or herself and to hand
over power and to participate in society such as democracy.
What happens,
if we try to destroy
hazardous living material
motion systems-individuals
once and for all? The deflection
of momentum density-motion, power of the material motion
system-individual out of interval of existence is the result of biased
self-momentum, movement, power as the result of the ambient movement
and collisions of particles of surrounding material motion
systems-individuals and the facts outside the objective ideal momentum
density-motion, i.e. maximum sustainable momentum-movement of any
material motion system, except gradually in cases of legitimate
self-defense and extreme emergency. In other words, removing the
guarantee of the general existence of living material movement
systems-individuals we threaten ultimately our children and ourselves.
The society, which condemns to death a killer (other than the corporal
punishment, except the death penalty, gradually if needed defense and
extreme emergency), it is also the killer and it becomes accustomed to
accept the deaths of its members and from it ensuing negative
consequences such as war and dictatorship. The same is true about the
death of other living creatures except gradually legitimate
self-defense and extreme distress.
Good and evil
deeds
Good deeds are acts that cause consistency of material motion systems-facts, i.e. a movement with the objective ideal
momentum-motion, power i.e.
the continuous maximum momentum-motion, power of each material
motion sub-system of the total material motion field-reality,
i.e., a move that reduces the least the subjective ideal momentum-motion, power (short-term maximum
momentum-power) of material motion sub-systems-facts in favor
of objective ideal
momentum-power,
i.e. the movement, which is based on the existence of all living
material movement systems-organisms with their absolute (total)
momentum-motion, graded according to the utility for the whole,
virtually according to continuous
sustainable increase of momentum-motion, power of the total live material motion
field-living organisms and its various parts up to the maximum
sustainable momentum-omnipotence. Increasing the sustainable
momentum
of all living material movement systems it is designed to create only one material motion system, single harmonic material reality,
i.e. a single cloud of moving material particles with the related
momentum and of non-zero weight that is the only Being in the material
world made up by everyone and everything, kind of legal person of all
people and all creatures controlling all the nature. This is similar to the world of particles of zero mass,
all points of space-time, which
also includes all matter, light and vacuum, which is also a harmonic
and coherent and which is the cause of the gradual development of
analogically harmonic world of matter, a single material motion system,
see above.
Wickedness on the contrary causes in turn the mismatch of
material motion systems-facts, i.e., a move, which more or less
deviates from the objective ideal momentum-motion, power,
especially promoting
subjective ideal momentum-motion, power not limited in the interest of
an objective ideal momentum-motion, power. Subjective ideal momentum-power
I understand as the short-term maximum momentum-motion, power, the objective ideal momentum-power
I understand as the continuous
maximum
momentum-motion, power of material
motion sub-system-individual or other facts.
In the case of
a single material motion sub-system-fact as the total material movement
system-reality the objective
and subjective ideal momentum-motion
of this motion system-phenomenon is identical, according to
the Philosophy of Balance the history, virtually the evolution leads
more probably towards fulfilling this objective ideal momentum-motion
through the various material motion sub-systems,
individuals and other facts as part of the overall movement
system-reality. This also promotes within the matter, which is the
movement of particles of nonzero mass, ultimately, of a zero weight,
which together constantly interferes in the form of collisions of
particles. This is evident especially in waves and light, virtually
electromagnetic waves, which then represent the net movement, harmonic
continuum and while material things have a property of waves called de
Broglie waves. Increasing in
the absolute (total) momentum-motion, power of a material motion
system of man, i.e. their
ability and capacity, virtually power that is sustainable and it leads
inevitably to the unification of material motion sub-systems-facts, and
to the approximation to the objective ideal momentum-motion, power of
the whole of mankind, otherwise it threatens a re-reduction of the
absolute (total) momentum-motion, power through extinction of human
civilization in the Civil war.
Therefore, good
deeds mean subordination to the objective ideal momentum-motion, power.
In the case of evil
deeds we contribute to the inconsistency of material motion system-facts that is sustainable only at low absolute
(global) momentum-movement, power of the material motions systems-individuals or the facts, thus at a small material
motion system, e.g. in a small State etc.
The result of evil deeds is ultimately a reduction in the absolute
(total) momentum-motion, power of humanity in a longer time, which
disappears in their superiority in the civil or external war, in
essence it is the self-destruction.
The result of
good deeds is to enhance compliance of material motion
systems-reality and thus the absolute (total) momentum-motion,
power of the certain common material motion system-individual, in other words
harmonious society and its universality are the condition for
increasing ability of man, i.e. his or her power. Otherwise,
inconsistencies in the society, along with an increase in the absolute
(global) momentum, virtually power lead to war or disputes that may
ultimately return the civilization to its beginning in the case of its extinction in a civil war or
external war, to re-reduce the absolute (total) momentum-power of this
civilization.
This opinion
stems from the fact, that the increase in absolute (total)
momentum-power means widening the material movement system-civilization
and its approaching to the
total material motion system-material reality, where objective ideal motion-momentum of the individual promotes through the
objective ideal momentum-motion of a whole-i.e. of world of particles
of zero mass, of all points of space-time that is
closer to the maximum sustained momentum of the individual as well as
their whole, or a maximum momentum of a single Being, of which material
particles do not collide together, but
moving with constant momentum according to the law of conservation of
momentum, in other words they live forever.
Love
Love can be described as the movement of more
living organisms and the surrounding almost without collisions, as
nearly the harmony of everybody and everything. This is not
movement entirely without collisions, because it is not currently
possible
because of mutual eating of organic matter except photosynthesis. It
should be so offset collisions in the
community of loving living organisms such as men and women,
as I mention below.
Adaptation of
movement, momentum, virtually energy density of material motion
system-reality
(i.e. a cloud of material particles with nonzero mass and continuing
momentum, virtually energy density-motion, i.e. momentum, virtually
energy per unit of volume) of male or female to the material movement
system-reality of surrounding in the form of
movement with maximum sustained momentum-power with the minimum particles collision,
where are collisions of particles, it is dual phase, it is always the correction of man’s conduct through the
woman’s conduct and vice versa.
It can be inferred, that the momentum-internal and external movement,
which adapts with clashes with the environment in above manner, it is
momentum-internal and external movement as the sum of the movement,
momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume of movement
system-fact of men and women, so with their constantly clashing in the
form of material movement systems-facts through particles
collision. It can be compared to standing on two legs, which is more
stable than the standing on a single leg.
Due to conflict with material movement system of women, a
man tends to reduce momentum, virtually energy-density, internal and
external motion and vice versa it can increase momentum,
virtually energy density-movement of women clashing with the material motion system-fact of man. In
the absence of confrontation of material movement systems-facts the
momentum density-internal and external movement of women lowers further
and the density momentum-motion of man increases. The man becomes destructive and the woman
vice
versa sensitive.
In what way there is a
clash of the material movement systems-facts of men and women in terms
of their particles collision. This is mainly physical contact from
non-binding patting to sex, the contact of the two bodies stimulates
the chemical reactions that can be understood as a clash between the
material movement systems (the clouds of particles of nonzero mass with
the downstream movement, momentum density) of chemical elements and
compounds in the form of collisions of particles, when it is
changing the absolute (total) momentum-power, movement and
also momentum density, therefore the momentum per unit of volume. These
chemical reactions cause then in the body a reduction of
momentum density-internal and external movement of men and an increase
in momentum density-movement of women.
Achieving the
objective ideal momentum-internal and external movement, which is able
to respond flexibly to clashes with the material movement
systems-facts of surrounding, so in my opinion it is only possible in
coexistence of men and women in terms of collisions of material
movement systems-facts of their bodies through collisions of particles.
In the event of
a failure of
momentum-internal and external movement of particles, either
in side of increased momentum density-motion of material movement
system (i.e. a cloud of particles with nonzero mass and continuous
movement, momentum density) of women or men, or in the side
of the reduced momentum
density-motion
of movement system of women or men, when the man with less momentum
density-movement is hypersensitive and a woman with a lower density
momentum-movement is childish or men with higher momentum
density-movement is aggressive and a woman with high momentum density-
movement has male features, it is possible to find it in the desire of
men with lower momentum density-movement
for an increase and in desire of women with higher momentum density-motion for its reduction and in search
for partners with the value of momentum density-movement that achieved with particle
collision described above the wanted shift.
Even in these
cases a solution is to find partners
of the opposite sex, with the lower momentum density-internal
and external movement of material motion
system
(i.e. a cloud of particles with nonzero mass and downstream momentum
density) in the case of weak men, or with higher momentum density-movement
for women, than the
individual concerned has, thus increasing in momentum density-movement of women and reduction of
momentum density, movement of man through collisions of particles in
the above sense and the establishment of normal relations
as necessary for procreation of children.
This momentum
distribution is also a guarantee of
relationship stability, since there is only one possible
stable relationship from the perspective of any extension of the
material movement system-movement by the procreation of children. Ability to adapt and to withstand relatively
stable as the resulting momentum density-motion of pair with respect to momentum
density-motion of surrounding material movement systems-facts
of living and inanimate nature, with which they clash, it is the main
reason for the continuation of the relationship and its expansion in
the form of numerous offspring.
Also same-sex couples may
perhaps meet the conditions of stable and responsive momentum
density-movement in relation to the surrounding motion
systems-facts, although this is due to the characteristics of weak men
as individuals with reduced momentum density-internal and external movement, and
women with masculine characteristics as individuals with increased
momentum density-movement almost impossible. However, there is not in
principle conceivable spread of movement system-fact with the
prevailing stable momentum density-motion through the offspring.
Sex drive and
other reasons of love
Man
and other forms of life are material movement systems-facts with the objective ideal
momentum-motion, power, which means
the movement of particles of material movement system (the cloud of
particles with nonzero mass and ultimately of a zero-weight with
downstream movement, momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of
volume) with a maximum sustainable momentum-motion, power, i.e. in
terms of permanent time with a minimum of collisions with other
particles and thereby preservation of their maximum momentum-movement
in terms of continuous time for ever according to the law of
conservation of momentum.
Currently,
however, live material movement systems-organisms are exposed to
numerous collisions with particles of surrounding material movement
systems-facts, that increase or reduce their momentum-internal and
external movement.
Sex drive
increases steadily the momentum (internal and external movement) of
man, it increases
the mental pressure and it reduces
the momentum- movement of the women,
i.e. making her hypersensitive. Sexual intercourse allows the compensation of the
momentum-movement of men and women closer
to the objective ideal momentum-movement of an individual.
This means,
that the sexual instinct makes people dependent on the presence of the
opposite sex, with which man or another living organism-movement system
is closer to the objective ideal momentum-internal and external motion, to
the formation of a single material movement system of everyone and all
with a related motion, momentum, as it was defined above, which in this
case is identical with the subjective ideal momentum-movement of the
whole. So the total amount of momentum, virtually energy-power can be
divided only that each got, what he or she enjoys, that they were able
to maintain their acquired momentum-power in terms of continuous time
without collisions with other individuals by law of conservation of
momentum.
People are in
this way closer to the existence of harmonic material world, it is the most
basic element of evolution as means of creating harmonic material world
as an image of harmonic world of movement of particles in the final
result of the zero mass, space-time
points, which also form the material world. In other
words, a woman cannot kill all
men, because she would not satisfy her sexual urge. In principle she
cannot leave all the man permanently or antagonize from the same reason.
For the same
reason man searches the
society of other people, because
they can help him or her to reduce the pressure of surrounding. From
the perspective of Philosophy of Balance of the exact sciences the
contact with them allows him or her reduction, virtually increase in
his or her momentum density-internal and external movement
changed in form of pressure of surrounding by collisions with
particles of surrounding material movement systems-facts (i.e., clouds
of particles with nonzero mass and downstream movement, momentum
density).
From this
perspective the human
society also allows to
a human the knowledge of and to achieve him or her their objective
ideal movement, momentum-power, their sum is equal to the subjective
ideal motion, momentum-power of the whole. Objective ideal motion,
momentum-power is the maximum sustainable momentum of the material
movement sub-system-fact. The subjective ideal-motion momentum is the
maximum short-term motion momentum of the individual. In other words,
the love of man to a sexual partner and love of man to children and to
other people teach them to love the world as a whole, whether bad or
good person. The same is true about love for domestic or other animal,
which allows a human to relieve of the ambient pressure in the form of
increased, virtually reduced momentum-internal and external movement
due to the objective ideal momentum-movement of the individual defined
above, and thereby they learn also to love the world as a whole. From
the perspective of Philosophy of Balance of the exact sciences, this
means achieving
subjective ideal
momentum-motion of the
individual, i.e. the maximum short-term momentum-movement, in the
interest of an objective ideal momentum-movement, i.e. the maximum
sustained momentum-motion.
It is concerned
therefore the evidence of evolution as means of reconciling
material world in keeping existence of all
its subjects except in cases of legitimate defense and extreme
emergency with graded absolute (total) momentum-motion according to a
whole benefits, virtually according to threat of everyone to avoid it,
regardless of whether they are evil or good.
Euthanasia
Euthanasia i.e. merciful
death or assisted suicide means, that a person is intolerably
suffering
and inevitable death threatens them
and another man helps him or her to commit a suicide.
In terms of
Philosophy of Balance of the exact sciences it is a case, where a material movement system-live
individual is moving on the border of the existential interval of
momentum-the internal movement of the organism,
and it is upper limit, when
it is decaying downstream movement, momentum of body through increasing
in motion,
momentum of its part, in other words,
the movement of this part becomes disharmonic with the whole organism,
it collides with it. Increase in momentum density-internal movement per
unit of volume, which is excruciating pain, and we are not able to
relieve of it by reducing the upper momentum-internal movement
of the material motion system-organism at least in the consciousness
and a continuous increase in momentum density-internal
movement threatens constantly and it leads irresistibly to exceed the
upper limit of the interval of existential momentum density-internal
movement.
In this case, a
man as material movement system-organism is exposed to combat, i.e. collisions with particles
of surrounding material motion systems-facts, which
are constantly increasing momentum
density-internal
movement of material movement system-body and they move it outside the
upper limit of the existential range of momentum density-internal
movement per unit of volume of a man as a material movement
system-organism (i.e. a cloud of particles with nonzero mass and
continuous movement, momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of
volume). At the same time it is a losing battle that only increases the
suffering of man without giving them hope of victory. In other words, we are not able to reduce the momentum density-internal
movement of people per unit of volume as material
movement system-organism within the existential interval of momentum
density-internal movement or in the mind of man as part of their
material movement system. That's at least, that the
consciousness understood a body as a harmonic material
movement system, i.e. a cloud of particles with nonzero mass and
related momentum-movement of these particles.
In terms of
Philosophy of Balance it is unacceptable even in this case to kill a
man, i.e. to help him to suicide, ethics
of Philosophy of Balance is based on a continuous search for consistent
movement of material motions systems-the facts it is sustainable approximation to the
lasting maximum momentum-power with minimum of collisions with other motion systems-facts, i.e. based on the permanent preservation of
the existence of any living material motion system, which the absolute (total) momentum-power, motion will be
graded according to the utility, virtually hazard to other material motion systems-facts.
Enforcing the compliance of material movement systems-facts, i.e.
objective ideal momentum-power, movement as a maximum sustainable
momentum-power movement, it is matter
of an evolutionary development, i.e. environmental fight characterized
by victories and defeats. I.e. to achieve the ideal
objective momentum-power movement of individual or
subsequently of the whole it is accompanied by a reduction and increase
of the absolute (total) momentum-power or momentum density-internal and
external movement per unit of volume of individuals, which is not
always directed directly to the objective ideal momentum-power,
movement .
Therefore, the
assisted suicide in the case of
euthanasia
means, that a man was fighting for their life and in this fighting
died.
This is not an escape from this fight, but death in this fight, because
the pain was unbearable, and also the pain and its unbearability are a
struggle in which one may win or lose.
Lose in the
struggle for life is a bad thing, just like any other loss, but if a
man or an animal fight against a vast and invincible superiority, it is
understandable and forgivable
matter.
Therefore, also the
merciful death is according to the Philosophy of Balance inadmissible,
because through the death of a man are dying both sick and
healthy living human cells, which certainly does not deserve a death,
which we have no right to kill, but under the above conditions of
euthanasia it is euthanasia case by case basis to understand, with the
need to bear the consequences of illegal acts of euthanasia.
Trust in
people
Man is the
material motion system-fact with the characteristic subjective
ideal momentum-power, motion, thus momentum density, a
momentum-motion per unit of volume, which guarantees in short-term the
least limited operation of each of its material movement
sub-systems-organs, tissues, cells (the clouds of particles with
nonzero mass and downstream movement momentum density, i.e. momentum
per unit of area), i.e. a momentum density-movement when one
feels the least pressure, pain or suffering, it can be likened to a
ball that moves itself with as much as possible momentum without losing
energy such as through friction, which continuously maintains its
momentum. This momentum density-power,
movement, one must restrict through their conscious behavior in order
to keep all other living creatures-motion systems including their own,
they must choose another momentum
density-motion
per unit of volume, which is within
their interval of existential values of momentum-power,
but then they feel the pain, pressure and suffering corresponding to
the restrictions on their subjective ideal momentum-power, it can be
likened to a ball that does not move alone, it restricts its highest
short-term momentum-power in order to maintain its momentum of
sustained high power-movement to reduce permanent collision with the
other balls moving with maximum sustained momentum, movement to a
minimum in terms of eternity, and so it could maintain their momentum
virtually power under the law on conservation of energy. In this case it is the objective ideal
momentum-power, movement, which seeks to create harmonic, continuous
and related movement of everyone and all, where each component will
move with the maximum momentum-movement without collisions with other
live motion systems, when the growth of momentum-movement of live motion systems is obtained from nonliving matter. This is
possible under the law of conservation of momentum, virtually energy
known in physics.
Trust in man is
then to rely on it, that person as a material movement system-fact in
their motion reduces their subjective ideal momentum-power in order to
maintain any other living material movement system-creature of whole,
including himself or herself as a material motion system-body and they
will rely on the fact, that others do it in order to maintain a whole,
including themselves. This reliance
on the other is, however, the reliance on the objective ideal momentum-power, movement,
hence their own slowdown is in the interest of their own permanent
highest momentum-power movement. It is thus a normative power of reality that
forces us but also other living material movement systems-creatures to
depart from their subjective ideal momentum-power, movement in the
interest of an objective ideal momentum-power, movement. Thus the objective ideal momentum-power, movement
of individuals is promoted as being identical with the
objective ideal momentum-power, movement of the living whole as
the result of the harmonic motion of particles in the final result of
the zero mass, i.e. all the points of space-time. In other words to achieve
maximum sustainable momentum, the movement of the living individual as motion system-body each living individual wants, and
that their maximum sustained momentum-power, movement ensures the
maximum sustained momentum-power movement of the living whole.
One thus gets to dispute, primarily to rely
on him or herself and his or her
momentum-power movement, it will never be exhausted through the clash
with the surrounding material motion systems-facts by particles
collision, if the ball, that it never stops, thanks to its momentum,
movement, and despite the fact, that friction, the second it is
voluntary restriction on their subjective ideal momentum-power,
movement and the reliance on the fact, that other living material motion systems-individuals
will want to preserve themselves and therefore they do not cause
unnecessary destruction of any living material motion system-
individual that does not threaten directly other live material motion
system-a creature of the same or higher order, and that risk cannot be
averted otherwise, so in that way they save themselves, as the ball it
means, that it relies on the fact, that material motion
systems-balls with a higher
momentum, movement they surrender it voluntarily to keep the ball
movement, which threatens to halt the movement, because they are in the
position of the moving balls, which threaten to stop due to
friction. This is because of the law of conservation of momentum, then
the movement of all the existing balls or the new balls through the
release of energy from nonliving matter, virtually possible dissolution
of dead material movement systems.
Trust in people as material movement systems-creatures, i.e.
increasing their absolute (total) momentum-power, movement releasing
the energy from non-living material motion systems-things it must correspond to the
compliance requirements of all the material motion systems-facts,
namely to the conservation of all living material movement
systems-creatures, except legitimate self-defense and extreme emergency
for ever and at the same time to the ideal objective momentum
density-power, movement, it is sustainable
approximation to the maximum momentum-power, movement of each material motion system-fact.
Therefore it is harmful to jump in absolute (total) momentum-power,
movement of a human as a movement system-creature, i.e. their options,
either because of ignorance or bad intentions the deviation will be from the ideal objective
momentum-power movement of the whole towards the subjective ideal
momentum-power, movement of individual, which
causes the disappearance of many material motion systems-creatures
through collisions of particles. It is therefore necessary to increase
the absolute (total) momentum-power
of
man and also the compliance of all creatures and nature
gradually-evolutionarily, i.e. their possibility, that smoothly with
increasing their absolute (total) momentum-power through their mind
they guarantee the
compliance with the objective ideal momentum-power, movement, and even
through a retreat from their subjective ideal momentum-power,
movement.
Not eating of
meat
Creating
harmonic, i.e. gradual material movement system-reality in material
world composed of moving particles with nonzero mass ultimately of a
zero weight it is to find such a structure of momentum density-movement per unit of volume, when it
will not be exceeded an interval of existence of any living material
movement system-creature, from which it is composed, even if the
subjective ideal momentum-power movement of any of these material
motion sub-systems-creatures is not achieved, the
subjective ideal
momentum-power, movement will be limited in favor of an objective ideal
momentum-power movement, which itself guarantees the maximum
sustainable momentum-power, movement of each of the material motion
sub-system-facts.
In the event, that such a structure of momentum-power, movement, which
guarantees the existence of all living material movement
system-creatures, it will not exist, it must be ensured to
minimize loss of live
material motions system,
that the average striker will
be sacrificed, who
does not act in extreme
emergency, who directly threatens
to destroy other average material movement system-creature of the same
or higher order. In other words, the material motion system-creature will be destroyed, of which particles have
directly to cause through the collision with particles of other
material motion system-creature the deflection of their momentum
density-movement beyond their existence interval. In the event, that it
directly threatens the destruction of
average live material movement
system-individual of same
order as the
attacker, who is in
extreme emergency, who avoids otherwise
unavoidable his or her own death,
the
situation should be
resolved by lot between the death
of one and another. Destruction
of average material motion system-individual of lower order
except in cases of legitimate defense and extreme emergency, however,
it would be a crime but not punished by the death (nor destruction of
live material movement system-life of the same order except gradually
for necessary defense and the extreme emergency that should not be
punished, it should not be punished by death)
From this
perspective a harmonic
material motion system-reality, a single cloud of material particles with
nonzero mass and the downstream movement, it excludes eating of meat, because
the destruction of the material motion systems-individuals brings
without the condition of inevitability the total material movement
system-fact matter away its
harmony, i.e. a maximum sustainable momentum density-power,
movement while maintaining all living material motion systems, i.e. the
only one harmonic, continuous and related material motion
system-reality. If eating
meat is essential for the
organism (in case of extreme emergency) and
this is probably only for the children not for adults, how
scientific researches tell, the less perfect animal should be
sacrificed, but there one must first determine whether the meat may be
substituted for carrions, milk or eggs diet, which do not require to
kill an individual. Carnivorous
animals in nature, it is insane animals of
lower order, probably need the meat diet (extreme emergency), there the nature replaces
the above described lots
drawing by so-called struggle for life and the adaptation of individual
attackers and the victim to this fight through an evolutionary fighting equipment of
each species.
From this
perspective the war for the right thing should be seen.
The soldiers should be allowed if possible to have the
painless death by
using modern science, if that death is inevitable. This painless death
is also necessary to allow to sacrifice animals to saturate the
children, if that death is inevitable to save the evolutionarily more
perfect individual. Soldiers should also be properly paid, because they
risk their lives for the society. From this perspective, the priority
must be given to a professional army, but it cannot be ruled out
universal arm requirement for legitimate self-defense and fighting for
the right thing.
Good thing I
mean restriction of subjective ideal momentum-power, movement of material movement system-individual, i.e.
momentum, movement, which is the highest attainable momentum-power but
only for short-term, with the long term it is often a substantial
reduction of the highest attainable momentum-power, movement. Any
restriction of subjective ideal momentum is associated by the dying or the disappearance of part of the
material motion system-life at
the same time, but there is a guarantee, that this live material
movement system is not destroyed as a whole, therefore, all living
material movement systems-subjects permanently
will exist and they will increase their momentum-power, movement within
the objective ideal momentum density-power,
movement,
which means the maximum sustainable momentum-power, movement of
material motion system-fact, while preserving all existing live
material motion systems-individuals. In the case of a person it is
true, whether the man is good or evil, and the same is for the animals.
Regarding the
consumption of meat of already dead animal, or even of dead human, so
material movement system-organism or animal is to oscillate around their objective ideal
momentum-power movement, i.e. to behave according to their good nature.
And for both animal and man, it follows that even a man, except in
cases of extreme emergency, he or she should not eat human or animal
flesh of dead individuals. However, in any event it is no excuse for
killing for enough corpses of animals for meat consumption of another
individual.
Regarding the
prevention of eating of meat to other people according to the chapter
on ethics, it should be gradual
evolution towards harmonic movement in our
dimension, i.e. the maximum sustainable momentum-power movement with
minimal clashes with other material motion systems-facts, with the
maximum sustainable momentum-power, movement, which can be achieved
first in patterns (see section Model and the
idea of chapter 2.3 About basis of being (ontology) ), which is
based on the future existence of the law. It must be time to adjust a
momentum-behavior of living material motion systems-individuals through
particles collisions, that the law was the result of one consciousness
of material movement system-i.e. of harmonic material reality and of
all the movement of particles of positive mass and zero mass, of all
points of space-time, which produce particles of nonzero mass.
Non-eating of
living creatures except in cases of extreme emergency (eating only
plant seeds and plant fruits with the permissible amount of water and
minerals such as salt) is the only guarantee as to me, that a man have to avoid
as
much as possible of the insoluble dilemmas in life, when they must
choose between death or threats of death of a living creature (humans,
animal, plants, fungi, living cells, bacteria, viruses) instead
of other living creature (it addresses for participants of the
situation of almost insoluble dilemma in cases of legitimate defense
and extreme emergency in life).
2.7 ABOUT STATE AND LAW
I. GENERAL
PART
I / a) Law,
virtually agreement (contract) and coercion
Contract (Agreement) is in terms of law the multisided act. The
constituent unilateral legal acts, i.e. proposals (oferta) and
adoptions (acceptances), they must satisfy elements
of acts as the § 34 et seq. Act. No. 64/1964 Coll.
Civil Code. Legal act is the act of will seeking, inter alia,
formation, modification or termination of those rights or obligations
that legislation links with such an act. Manifestation of the will can
be made by act or omission, it may become explicitly or otherwise not
arising doubts about what participant wanted to show.
Legal action must be made freely and seriously, certainly and
understandably,
otherwise it is invalid. Act designed to impossible performance is
invalid. That act is invalid, if the person, who made it, has no legal
capacity. Except, where the act made in the form required by law or
agreement of the participants, it is invalid. Participant, who
concluded a contract in distress at obviously disadvantageous
conditions, has the right to withdraw. The legal act is invalid if the
person did it, acting in error, based on the fact, that is crucial for
its implementation, and the person, who that act has been determined,
caused this error or it ought to have known. Legal action is also
invalid, if the error was caused by the person intentionally. Mistake
in motive of the act is not invalid.
Qualifying of
individuals have rights and obligations arising birth. This character
has conceived child, if he or she was born alive. Capacity of natural
persons through own legal acts to acquire rights and to take on duties
(legal capacity) it is produced in full by the emancipation
with reaching legal age. Capacity to have rights and obligations has
also legal entities. Legal capacity of
a
legal person, i.e. to acquire the rights and obligations it may be
restricted by law.
Now I will
focus only on agreements of individuals,
because legal persons represent from this agreement of individuals
derived specific agreements to establish such a legal person.
Agreements between legal entities and between natural and legal
persons, ultimately, are only an agreement between natural persons,
i.e., virtually between individuals, who have agreed on the
establishment of legal persons.
Contract as a
multilateral legal act of individuals and a contract as legal,
virtually social relation between individuals by it based and
regulated it is the base for all legal relationships in
society. Such a contract is both, various
legal contracts of individuals under national law and agreement between States under
international law. Such contract is a contract both of individuals and contracts establishing and governing legal persons.
These legal persons including the State and the international community
constitute a social contract as a legal relationship, which essentially
corresponds to the complex form of the above agreement of individuals
covered by the Civil Code. Such contract is national
and international law as a multilateral legal act, which
constitutes the social contract of individuals of the State or the
international community governing their social relationship.
The concept of law as a contract also reflects
the contemporary Czech law, that
prescribes similar the requirements of architectural elements
of the legal act. E.g. in the Czech Republic, it is the consent of the
social contract subjects on behalf of the legislative organs
(cf. ARTICLE 2, paragraph 1 of the
Constitution ČR). Requirements relating to the will, namely
the fact (given), freedom and dignity and the equivalence of the expression and will are provided in the legislative
process in Article 37 et seq. the
Constitution of the ČR and Rules of Procedure of the Chamber
of Deputies and the Senate ČR. In my view legislative process is
analogous to complex contracting process including in particular the
draft of law and its approval. The most important requirement of
freedom of the will against violence and threats are protected
in Article 26 of the Constitution ČR
and also in § 92 of the
Criminal Code, the criminal act of subversion
against the Republic. The requirement relating to the object of law as
a social contract specifically its possibility and compliance with
morality it expresses particular Article 2,
paragraph 3 of the Constitution ČR, which provides that the
State power shall serve all citizens. The requirement of the elements of expression of the will
reflects Article 52 of
the Constitution ČR, which
provides, that the validity of the law is requiring its publication.
Unlike conventional legal acts, however, the principle of majority, the
assumption of superiority and accuracy of the act apply.
The
relationship of the contract and coercion
also appears in the concept of social contract with the political
thinker Rousseau Jaques (1712-1788),
which dealt with the State organization. Rousseau is for a
concentration of power, direct democracy and the imperative mandate.
His concept of social contract recalls Marxist conception of the State.
J.J. Rousseau represents social contract as a legal government based on
a convention or free consent. Each member of society gives all their
power as a common good under the highest management of general
will (Volonté générale).
This generates a mental association as a public person, there are
people. People are the only bearer of sovereignty. Will of the
sovereign the general will is to determine through the votes. The
degree of freedom of the society and the individual is determined by
the level of understanding of the real interests of society. Imperfect
knowledge can lead to mistakes and will of
all (Volonté de tous) remains only a kind of
subjective perception, not describing real interests of the people and
thus deviating from Volonté générale.
The confused are in this sense not acting freely, and people should be
forced to do right. And this coercion does not mean by Rousseau
anything other than the forcing to be free.
Knowledge of
every living creature in my opinion, is imperfect picture, reflection
of the world (different worlds of experiance
by the philosopher Kant I.), knowledge in mind, the soul of
every living creature cannot fully encompass the whole world, this
image is never completely identical to the reality (real
world by the philosopher Kant I.). The challenge of living
creatures is at everyday life in any relationship to all living
creatures and inanimate nature, to reconcile all of these images (the
world of experiance of all individuals) in a single overall picture of
reality (in a single world of experiance) that
describes best
the whole
reality (the real world), through common
eliminating
of all conflicts of mental picture of reality of every living creature,
through their free and genuine
above defined agreement
meeting the requirements of a multilateral legal act according to
§ 34 et seq. Civil Code. If this agreement may not be
possible, then a coercion. This constraint corresponds to the above
transformation of the will of all (Volonté de tous) in
general will (Volonté générale) by
J.J. Rousseau.
Degree of
perfection approaching knowledge of the real world, i.e. rate
of the general will (Volonté générale)
in today's society is in my view, the actual level of free
above mentioned agreement according to § 34 et seq. Civil Code
in the society. Where not to reach this
agreement in society, there is a different and controversial idea about
the real world of the individuals (individual worlds of experiance),
the will of all (Volonté de tous) by J. J.
Rousseau. In the case of imperfect ideas about the real world of living
beings, will of all (Volonté de tous) by J.J. Rousseau then the coercion is but also by the fact (it is the
normative power of reality), which seeks to achieve for the
living beings in the future, the above agreement according to
§ 34 et seq. Civil Code in areas, where they currently are
unable to agree.
Error of J.J.
Rousseau was, that he did not deal further with necessary conditions to
be placed on the coercion of the general will (Volonté
générale), which became the subject of
speculative philosophy, for example Marxism--Leninism, which was not abel during its
reign to determine, whether it seeks an above future
full agreement according to § 34 et seq. Civil Code
in society of all or not. Only after several decades it has been shown,
that the level of full agreement with this society does not increase,
but it decreases. In other words, socialism could not move to the
promised ideal society of all, which should be communism (by password
to each according to their abilities, to each according to their
needs), but the ideal was moving away, lack of goods, environmental
pollution, and suppression and non-solving of contradictions in
society, etc.
What are
conditions of that enforcement of the general will (Volonté
générale), knowledge of the real world balancing
individual human ideas about it (different worlds of experiance)? In my
view, this coercion must be primarily
educational, with each such individual forcing it must grow
the rate of above mentioned agreement under § 34 et seq. Civil
Code in society of all, with it the total rate of conflicts, virtually
fighting at society of all must fall. If this individual
forcing is stepped up the total force of conflicts in the
society of all, then such individual coercion and compulsion is not the
general will (Volonté générale), but
moving away from it instead of approaching it, it is a worse form of
the will of all (Volonté de tous). For constraints
resulting from the will of individuals or small groups of individuals
it is necessary, that the individual forcing apparently
increased in terms of the individual or small groups of individuals the
level of agreement at society of all, virtually decreasing strength of
disputes at society of all.
Cause of
different ideas about the real world of individual people, who are not
currently able to reach the above agreement according to § 34
et seq. Civil Code, i.e. misguided will of
all people (Volonté de tous) instead of the general will
(Volonté générale) by J.J. Rousseau it
is, in my opinion, especially mismatch of needs and values of the world
we have, another reason is, that we ourselves do not know our real needs.
Our needs are, which forces us to dominate the greater part of the
world, than at any particular moment we just master. The dispute over
the values of the world, it is the subject of our needs, which is the
control and exploitation of living creatures and inanimate nature, this
is the cause. Our real needs related to the fact, that we are more or
less energetic living creatures, energetic live creatures have bigger
real needs, the less energetic living creatures have a lower real
needs. If we can meet our real needs through
our current agreement according to § 34 et seq. Civil Code,
there is no reason not to agree. If we cannot satisfy these
needs, or if we have a mistaken idea of our real needs, the coercion
must take over the role of the agreement (contract). This constraint,
however, should correspond to our actual needs, so reducing the overall
power of disputes at society of all, or move towards a future agreement
under § 34 et seq. Civil Code. At the same time, in
my opinion the need is in the subconscious of every living creature,
together we conquered all the values of the world, we were together
omnipotent, to threaten us no danger, that we could not turn away. The
perfect situation is possible in the future, at present it is necessary
to allocate the world values (economic goods), so we are approaching
this state as far as possible.
This is through
a free and genuine agreement according to § 34 et seq. Civil
Code at the society of all, then the general will (Volonté
générale) by J.J. Rousseau. Where it is
impossible to achieve it starts forcing at society of all but also of
the objective reality (it is a normative power of reality), which seeks
to provide greater and then full future agreement under § 34
et seq. Civil Code at the society of
all, it is the general will (Volonté
générale) by J.J. Rousseau. In my opinion greater degree of consistency between all living
beings, a greater degree of agreement in the above mentioned society of
all living beings, while, in my opinion, it makes a greater degree of
understanding and mastering of live and inanimate nature as
bigger power of society of all. In other words, aligning all ideas
about the real world of the individual people through this agreement,
we acquire the almost perfect picture of the real world, we know
the objective reality and it allows also us still more
completely to dominate and to exploit it.
The Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Act No. 23/1991 Coll.) states
that people are free and equal in dignity and in rights, duties can be
imposed only by law and within its limits and only if the fundamental
rights and freedoms preserved,
citizens have the right to participate in the management of public
affairs, directly or freely choosing their representatives. It
establishes the primacy of the above agreement according to §
34 et seq. Civil Code in the relations of people, and restrictions on
coercion, which replaces the agreement, if it is not possible. The
coercion is possible thus only on the basis of a common will
of the people, that their agreement in the above sense. Hence it
increases the rate of agreement of the society to approach the general
will of the people (Volonté générale)
by J.J. Rousseau.
Therefore in my
opinion an individual should endeavor for the true knowledge of the real
world, the reality, that through the agreement they should attempt to
reconcile their vision of the world and the notion of a world,
which the other living beings have, if impossible, then the
coercion. This is coercion on the side of individuals, who seek to
impose their vision, and from other individuals, who are trying to
convince about their truth, that individual or other living creatures,
as well as by the whole objective reality, if the behavior
according to this misaligned image of it of the living creatures it
encountered on this reality, it is not consistent with that due to
inconsistency and imperfection, virtually incompleteness of ideas and
different ideas about the reality of live creatures are mutually closer
and closer together with this reality. In case of impossibility to
reach an agreement now an individual should seek the agreement in the
future, in other words, to know the views of other individuals trying
to understand them and align them with their views and the objective
reality. Individual should be so in their
behavior always based on the need of keeping the current real and free
agreement according to § 34 et seq. Civil Code, i.e., the
general will (Volonté générale) and
the need to achieve such a future currently only hypothetical
agreement, i.e. the general will (Volonté
générale).
Literature:
1.) Poměr
uváení a vázanosti
státních orgánů
právními normami, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.,
2007, www.e-polis.cz
2.) Vztah
mezinárodního práva
veřejného a soukromého a
vnitrostátního práva z pohledu
upravovaných společenských vztahů,
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., www.e-polis.cz , 2006
3) The
Philosophy of Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
4) STORIG,
H.J.: Malé dějiny filosofie. Praha, Zvon, 1991, p. 271 et
seq.
I / b) Private and
public law, virtually contract
Contract (Agreement) is in terms of law the multisided legal act.
The constituent unilateral legal acts, i.e. proposals (oferta) and
adoptions (acceptances), they must satisfy elements
of acts as the § 34 et seq. Act. No. 64/1964 Coll.
Civil Code. Legal act is the act of will seeking inter alia,
formation, modification or termination of those rights or obligations
that legislation links with such an act. Manifestation of the will can
be made by act or omission, it may become explicitly or otherwise not
arising doubts about what participant wanted to show.
Legal action must be made freely and seriously, certainly and
understandably,
otherwise it is invalid. Act designed to impossible performance is
invalid. That act is invalid, if the person, who made it, has no legal
capacity. Except, where the act made in the form required by law or
agreement of the participants, is invalid. Participant, who concluded a
contract in distress at obviously disadvantageous conditions, has the
right to withdraw. The legal act is invalid if the person did it,
acting in error, based on the fact, that is crucial for its
implementation, and the person, who that act has been determined,
caused this error or it ought to have known. Legal action is also
invalid, if a person causes an error intentionally. Mistake in motive
of the act is not invalid.
Public contract I mean
especially the social contract, which is particularly prevalent in the
political thinkers Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), John Locke (1632-1704)
and Jacques Rousseau (1712-1788), who discussed the establishment of
State. In fact, the social contract
embodies constitutional law of each State, subject to
the social contract, however, also other social relationships of
private and public nature. Public, virtually social contract is a law
of each State, as well as international law, both international
treaties and, in my opinion, other sources of international law,
especially the usage. Even public contract should satisfy regulatory elements of act in accordance
with § 34 et seq. Civil Code, but in somewhat modified form.
The concept of law as a contract also reflects the contemporary Czech
law, that prescribes similar the
requirements of architectural elements of the legal act. E.g. in the
Czech Republic it is the consent of the social contract subjects on
behalf of the legislative organs (cf. ARTICLE
2, paragraph 1 of the Constitution ČR). Requirements relating
to the will, namely the fact (given), freedom and dignity and the
equivalence of the expression and will are provided in the legislative
process in Article 37 et seq. the
Constitution of the ČR and Rules of Procedure of the Chamber
of Deputies and the Senate ČR. In my view legislative process is
analogous to complex contracting process including in particular the
draft of law and its approval. The most important requirement of
freedom of the will against violence and threats are protected
in Article 26 of the Constitution ČR
and also in § 92 of the
Criminal Code, the criminal act of subversion
against the Republic. The requirement relating to the object of law as
a social contract specifically its possibility and compliance with
morality it expresses particular Article 2,
paragraph 3 of the Constitution ČR, which provides that the
State power shall serve all citizens. The requirement of the elements of expression of the will
reflects Article 52 of
the Constitution ČR, which
provides, that the validity of the law is requiring its publication.
Unlike conventional legal acts, however, the principle of majority, the
assumption of superiority and accuracy of the act apply.
What is the
difference between the above-mentioned public and private contract.
This difference may explain in philosophical terms. Knowledge of every
living creature in my opinion, is imperfect picture, reflection of the
world (different worlds of experiance by the
philosopher Kant I.), knowledge in mind, the soul of every
living creature cannot fully encompass the whole world, this image is
never completely identical to the reality (real
world by the philosopher Kant I.). The challenge of living
creatures is at everyday life in any relationship to all living
creatures and inanimate nature, to reconcile all of these images (the
world of experiance of all individuals) in a single overall picture of
reality (in a single world of experiance) that
describes best
the whole
reality (the real world), through common
eliminating
of all conflicts of mental picture of reality of every living creature,
through their free and genuine
above defined agreement
meeting the requirements of a multilateral legal act according to
§ 34 et seq. Civil Code. If this agreement may not be
possible, then a coercion.
For private contract, to which participants (subjects)
are just a few of the persons forming the society of all, so
view of world contained in their private contract does not describe
perfectly the whole reality, that it is again the imperfect or
contradictory picture of the world (single world of experiance), which
is partly harmonic and partially
contradictory to another private contract of a few people
from society of all as the participants in this private contract or
other private will of others, which again are imperfect or
contradictory picture of the world (single world of experiance). If
above public contract is reached, of which free and truly consenting participants
are more, much or nearly all persons in society of all, as it
is currently approaching law
of democratic States and international law, then it
is a much truer picture of reality contained in this contract, it is a
much better approximation to reality (the only real world), with its
view in the minds of all people (the dominant world of experiance). For
this reason it is necessary in the case of private contracts to apply
the requirement, that private contract in terms of content or purpose, or
circumvention it would not resist the law and the
good manners would not be broken.
However, the participant of
each contract public or private should be only
the affected person. For each private contract can be
distinguished its content, which affects only the participants
in this private contract, which is not necessary to modify by the law
as a public social contract, and the content that affects more people.
Possibly the general public, which then has the right to participate in
this contract in the form of regulation as a public social contract.
The above
philosophical base of private contract, virtually unanimous public
contract as an imperfect image of the world (a single world of
experiance), which must be brought into line with other private
contracts in society of all to get an overall, comprehensive picture of
reality (the real world), it shows also the requirements on individuals
and society using coercion in the case of inability to reach a private
agreement on matters, of which affected parties are just some people at
the society of all, and the inability to attain public contract, of
which consenting participants should be all in society of all. In my
view this coercion must be primarily
educational, with each such individual forcing them it
must grow the rate of above mentioned agreement under
§ 34 et seq. Civil Code at society of all, it must fall with
it the total rate of conflicts, virtually fighting at society of all,
it must grow the rate of
private contracts as well as the number of participants agreeing with a
public contract or law in society of all.
To decide
whether the above coercion or this compulsion heightens level
of disputes in society, it is not always easy. In terms of the ability
of public contract or law with a large number of participants to
embrace better picture of reality (the real world) it can be said, that
participants in public contracts are better able to decide on this
coercion than individuals. Ideally consenting
participants of public contracts are all persons including
those that will be the addressee of this constraint. Such an assumption
is just unreal ideal, to which we must try really to approach at least
at the form, that such coercion will be authorized in a free and
genuine agreement within the meaning of § 34 et seq. Civil
Code by addressees of this coercion after execution as an
educational resource. In this respect, it should also evaluate the
application or not to apply the corporal punishment except the death penalty in
a particular case. It will be a kind of
fiction of a contract of a public entity with the compelled.
However, even if the party consenting above public contract will not be
all the people in the society of all, the priority should be given the
law or a public contract in case of the above constraint. Indeed, the
reality (a single world of experiance), which is the result of the agreement of majority in society of
all, it is substantially better than the image of
reality (the real world) in terms of individuals or small group of
individuals. However, even this picture of reality as a result of the
majority is not completely true.
The truth we
can only mark as to me the reality (the real world) and the lie that is
not real, and every statement of fact, it cannot cover in its
entirety, (the world of experiance), it does not affect the
reality as a whole, in other words, every statement is partly as fact
true, partly as a fact wrong, i.e. partially lying. It can
only be distinguished mostly true statement, it is a statement, which
is mostly happening (the real world) and mostly wrong statement that is
largely untrue, that statement is in fact (the real world) mostly not
happening. We can say, that every man,
whether guilty or innocent, whether friend or enemy, he or she is in
his or her words and thoughts partly right and partly lying.
In other words, in my opinion, it will never be achieved perfectly true
picture of reality, but a growing number of consistent images of
individuals (individual worlds of experiance) through their contract in
accordance with § 34 et seq. Civil Code we still get better
picture of reality (the real world), but still it will be a picture,
even almost perfect, not a fact, that is in my opinion, reserved only
to God.
Therefore public contract or the law to which the principle
of majority applies, it cannot justify coercion clearly
harmful to society in
terms of individual, it is an obvious increase in disputes in
society associated with each such individual forcing, which must be in the event of a substantial degree of injustice
remedied by legal means, namely by a public contract of minority and
majority and in the case of impossibility of legal ways by extra-legal means. Enough
extent, where intervention of legal or extra-legal means, justifies,
that in my opinion in the case of minor
hazards it is sufficient normative force of natural development of
reality to eliminate the minor risk. Contradiction with the
facts sooner or later forces a participant to leave the view clearly
harmful to society, as described above. Coercion based on the will of
individuals or small groups of people in the society of all it
should be limited to cases of law, virtually forcing from
their point clearly harmful to society, because the majority opinion
(the dominant world of experiance) has significantly improved picture
of reality (the real world) than the opinion of an individual or small
group of people (a minority world of experiance) at the society of all.
For above using of non-legal means of compulsion on the
part of individual or small group at the society of all during the
failure of law (i.e. public contracts) clearly harmful to
society, that either it is not the majority of
society, but only a minority ruling suppressing the rights of this
unified majority, or, if otherwise harmful obviously law to be taken by
the majority, which amplifies the disputes within the society,
or imperfections of law as an enforceable public (social) contract that
requires enforcement, e.g. in the case of international law at the
present time, modified principles of national law apply, known
as principles of subsidiarity and
proportionality in case of extreme emergency and legitimate
self-defense. In an extreme emergency and necessary defense, the
violence can avert this danger, if it is direct, not otherwise
avertable consequence of this action, which is not obviously more
harmful than the effect that threatens from this danger. In the case of
above using non-legal means due to fail of the applicable law those
principles apply also with the difference, that danger
is not imminent, it can also be a remote risk that cannot be averted
otherwise. This follows from the fact, that in averting the
dangers involved in extreme emergency or need defense in the domestic
law it is always possible in case of remote danger to ask for
assistance the components of State authority, which have the
duty and power to intervene effectively. In the event of failure of
justice, however, this obligation and the power to intervene
effectively are not given, either because of imperfections in the case
of international law, which still has not constituting a sovereign
State or international Federation possibly Confederation, or in the
case of an unjust State system, virtually law which is clearly harmful
to society (see above). Principle of undamaging result is controversial
and obvious after the completion using non-legal means, it is necessary
to mention other well-known national law principle, which will help us to assess compliance with the principles of
undamaging results using non-legal means before and during the use of
non-legal means. This next rule is the principle that the use of non-legal means may not be
obviously unreasonable to the risk of danger of obviously malicious
law, virtually coercion.
According to
the Czech legislature it will be obviously harmful to the law,
virtually coercion within the meaning Article
23 of the Constitutional Act No. 23/1991 Coll. dated January
9, 1991, which bring the CHARTER OF
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, by which citizens
have a right to stand up against whoever removingthe democratic order
of human rights and fundamental freedoms established by the Charter, if
the activity of constitutional authorities and effective use of legal
means are rendered impossible.
In conclusion,
the larger is number of participants
(subjects) of public (social) contract or law, who agree with it,
who propose or accept the contract, the freer is the use of coercion
contained in the provisions of the public (social) contract or law. The
above requirement is less valid for the contracting parties that with
each forcing the litigations rate declined at society of all obviously,
namely, that it was an obvious fairly constraint. Public contract or law, of which consenting
participants are nearly all in the society of all, it shows an almost
perfect (the predominant near perfect world of experiance) reality (the
real world) and the requirement of self evidence of justice of the
above coercion in terms of agreeing parties it is smaller.
This justice coercion may not be already
obvious to participants, but it must always be the purpose of the
public (social) contract i.e. law. Ideally, when consenting participants (actors) of the public
(social) contract will be all at society of all, any coercion will not
need. The focus is here on the natural
law, which we should really try to be as closely as
possible.
Literature:
1.) Poměr
uváení a vázanosti
státních orgánů
právními normami, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.,
2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
2.) Vztah
mezinárodního práva
veřejného a soukromého a
vnitrostátního práva z pohledu
upravovaných společenských vztahů,
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.e-polis.cz
,
2006
3) The Philosophy of
Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
4) STORIG,
H.J.: Malé dějiny filosofie. Praha, Zvon, 1991. P. 271 et seq.
5.) Budoucnost
práva, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
6.) Smlouva a
donucení, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
I / c) International law, virtually contract
The
international community is including, in my view, the international
social relations of States and individuals, while for adjustment of international social
relations between countries in the course of history, a public
international law
has set up the
area of international social relations between individuals, whether in
the form of relations of private individuals or private legal persons, has set up a private international law.
These international relationships are different from purely domestic
law that governs domestic relations of the State and its
nationals without an international element. How international
social relations of public international law and international social
relations of private international law are characterized by
international element in the sense as defined in
international private law, namely international element in the foreign
entity of a legal relationship, which may be either a foreign State or
a member, either a foreign legal entity or natural person, in
foreign indirect object of legal relations that is the case of
thing, right, intangible results of human activities to
which the behavior of participants of the legal
relationship is concerned, they are located abroad or otherwise
located, or linked to the foreign country or to be made abroad, then it
may be in international elements relevant to the formation and
existence of a legal relationship that has arisen or to occur abroad,
it may be a legal act or other event or conduct of the parties that is
legally relevant content of that relationship, or it may consist of a
legal relationship that is legally related or dependent (secondary) in
a legal relationship, if this relationship (primary, main) is regulated
by foreign or international law.
Conceptual
uncertainties concerning international private and public law
when
the legal norms of private international law will also include issues
of international social relations of public law (e.g. international
law, tax, criminal, foreigners law, etc.) and international public law
also regulates the relations between States, which are more private in
nature (e.g. international law of the Contracting), I propose to
exclude through the introduction of the resolution to international law of States (International law of
States, Staatsvölkerrecht, droit international des
États), that marked the public international law
with regard to the fact, that at least one side of the legal
relationship is always a foreign State as a sovereign, therefore, that
it is mainly interstate international
law and individual international
law or in Czech international
law of individuals (International law of individuals, Einzelrecht
internationales, droit international des individus) that
would mark the private international law with regard to the fact, that
the participants of legal relations are individuals and these relations
have the above international element, as an individual may appear here
a foreign State, which, however, does not act as the sovereign.
Regarding the
nature of international private or individual law in relation to public
international law, virtually of States so in the theory of
international private law, there are two approaches the
internationalist direction, that individual international law derives from international
law of States. Internationalist view of international private law held
in German legal theory Savigny, in his work System des
heutigen römischen Rechts, Ludwig von Bar, Zitelman Ernst,
Ernst Frankenstein, in the Italian legal theory Mancini, Esperson,
Fiore, in the French legal theory André Weiss, A. Pillet, in
the Dutch legal theory Jitta. Nationalist
direction sees individual international
law
as part of national law. Nationalist direction held in the Dutch legal
theory Paul Voet, in his work De statutis eurumque concurso, Voet and
Jan Ulrik Huber, in his work Praeelectiones Juris Civilis, in the
German theory there are Melchior, Lewald, Nussbaum, in the French legal
theory E. Bartin, J.P.Niboyet and Henri Batiffol in Anglo-American
legal doctrine there are Joseph Story, Walter Wheeler Cook, in his book
The Logical and Legal basis of the Conflict of Laws, David Cavers,
Brainard Currie, R.A. Leflar and also the second list of U.S. conflict
of laws called the Second Restatement of the Law of Conflict of Laws,
based on the considerations presented in 1952 article by Professor
Cheathama and reporter of the Restatement Professor Reese.
In the case of
international private and public law it is concerned the
social and legal
international relationships, because
between the affected and resolving subjects are also members of the
foreign country, either as individuals or their associations in the
form of the legal person or a foreign State, who have their own law and
own image of the right, virtually content of regulations
of the legal issues. At the current applicable international
private, virtually
individual law, and the state of society, virtually States, however,
there is a competition between the territorial jurisdiction of a
sovereign State over all persons and things located in the States and
international nature of social relations governed by private, virtually individual international law, because of lack of
regulation of international public
virtually
State law the States
are forced to regulate the international social relations of
individuals in an alternative way, namely on the basis of national law,
even in this regulation they cannot completely ignore the international
nature of the social relationships of individuals and their regulation,
where States are forced by the international nature of these
relationships to abandon the election of their law in favor of foreign law, the closest
relationship to the case (conflict rules) is concerned, and
it leads to the conclusion of numerous international treaties in the
field of public, virtually State
international
law.
Opinions on the
relation of public virtually State international law to national law can be
distinguished on the monistic teachings, the doctrine of the primacy of
national law and dualistic teachings. Monistic
teaching considers the notion of law as indivisible, assumes
the consistency of rules of law, secured by fixed rules of law
preventing conflicts between legal norms. The lower-ranking rule, which
is contrary to the legal superior rule of law, is invalid. Among the
rules of the same legal force the principle of lex posterior derogat
priori, a later rule cancels the earlier rule shall apply. Learning about the primacy of national law
builds on a par the international law with the outside State law. The
decisive factor is therefore the national law, the sovereign power of
the State with power over persons and things within its territory, in
international law there is a limitation of the sovereign authority to
surrender their sovereign powers to a greater or lesser extent to
international law, which empowers the State to own legislative
activity. The problem with this doctrine is customary norms of the
public or State international law. Traditional dualistic
teachings excludes unity of the international public,
virtually State law, they are two different legal systems, which turn
to other addressees of rights and obligations. A prerequisite, that the
rule of public virtually State international law governs social
relationships of individuals within States, it is the reception by the
State, namely by the norm of national law. Reception may be general or
special or to have individual character.
State sovereignty (engl. sovereign State) within the
meaning of the theory of State sovereignty, as described by the great
16th century French scientist Jean Bodin and deepened in the 17th
century by English philosopher Thomas Hobbes, and which can currently
be seen as an independent State authority to any other power, both in
the field of interstate relations and internal matters, it is in fact legal fiction. The internal dimension of
sovereignty of the State means that the State belongs the exclusive
supremacy on its territory to all persons and things (territorial
Highness). Regional Highness
includes
the highest power also over the foreigners, who reside in the territory
of a sovereign State and over their property.
The legal
fiction of sovereignty, i.e. exclusive supreme power of the State over
persons and things in the territory ignores the real State's
position, which is more or less dependent on both international
relations and the natural phenomena. The State as an association of
individuals in a particular territory as a social relationship of
people is part of an indivisible whole of all the other social and
natural relations of all persons and other living organisms and
inanimate nature. The strict boundaries between the social relations
within international law and social relationships in fact they do not
exist. There is only a single integral unit of social and natural
relations, consisting of both relations without the international
element, thus a purely internal relations of different countries, and
international relations of those States, which are a cross-border
relationships, whether between individuals from different countries and
their associations such as national and multinational private companies
or associations in the form of various States. In terms of social
relations there is no strict boundaries between internal and
international relations of the various States. Only such an integral
whole of the social relations of all persons and other living organisms
and inanimate nature is in fact a sovereign in the above sense of
sovereignty.
Therefore,
unlimited claim to the above fiction of national sovereignty
of the State is firstly inconsistent
with objective reality, secondly it can be a mean of controlling
individuals and other organisms living inside or outside the State or
foreign State through compulsion or direct violence, which may result
eventually in the outbreak of sharp conflict.
In the case of
international, virtually State public law, of which subject is
always a foreign State, it is a social relationship, which participants
are all persons of foreign State on the one hand, and other interested
parties on the other hand, which may be all the persons of another
State, i.e. State, virtually nation as a whole, or just a person of
that State, virtually nation, from the perspective of social
relationships there is not any real border between social relations,
involving all members of a State, virtually nation, and social
relations, involving small groups of people. This may be in my opinion consent to monistic learning of a single
law, where according to the principle pacta sunt servanda
(i.e., binding contracts) States are obliged to transfer their
international obligations into national law, whether by general or
special or individual reception national norm.
In my opinion
learning about the national nature of international private or individual law and dualistic learning,
virtually doctrine of the primacy of national law in international
public, virtually State law, of which supporters use it as a means of
justification of an unjustified unequal treatment of its own and
foreign nationals under national or international private or individual
law,
who use it as a means of non-compliance with its international
obligations of the public or
State international
law under national law, they control or seek to control
individuals inside or outside the State or foreign State through
compulsion or direct violence, which may, if material, result in the
outbreak of international disputes.
Literature:
- Malenovský
J., Mezinárodní právo
veřejné, Doplněk, Brno 1993.
- Philosophy of
Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
I / d) Judicial
law, virtually contract
As to the
relation of the discretion and liability of State authorities by legal
norms in national law and within the global legal system they set up
two basic approaches to address this issue.
Firstly it is
concerned continental legal systems, where the
State institutions are bound with the rules of law for issuance of individual
acts (decisions). State authority, mostly court is applying
the existing general legal rules for a unique case. This individual act
(decision) is to form, amend or terminate legal relations of
individuals in the case of constitutive acts
or authoritatively confirm the existence or absence of legal
relationships of individuals in the case of declarative
acts. With these individual acts (decision) on principle it
cannot be calculated in continental law as sources of law. Individual
acts (decisions) apply only to a single solution for the case of the
parties in the dispute, on principle, it has no legal effect for
others. Individual act (decision) of the court or other government
agency, especially if the decision of higher courts, but also in
continental law they have effects that are closer case law (see below)
in the Anglo-Saxon countries, State authorities and
participants refer to those decisions and in similar
cases they decide accordingly. Discretion of
State bodies in issuing individual legal acts (decisions) in the
mainland we understand discretion only within the legal norms issued by
the competent national authorities (most frequently the laws issued by
Parliament), this is done especially, if the conditions
(hypothesis), the content, i.e. the rights and obligations
(disposition) and sanction of rules are not clearly defined
but more or less indefinitely, in the first case, the competent
national authority is issuing an individual act (decision) only to
individualize general legal norm, i.e., it applies it to the individual
case and in the second it specifies the legal rule, that it
adds its content. Among the cases of discretion we may also
include the use of analogy to cases not covered by the legal norm, it
is a sort of gap in the law, when
we use in certain sectors or legal issues analogy
legis (analogy of the Act),
which allows the use of the rule of law, which governs most similar
relationship (analogical) individual case, if there is no such legal
norm, it is recognized in certain branches of the law to address the
matter of the spirit of the whole set of legal rules, according to the
guidelines, which are in a system of legal norms expressed
and, on which the system is based, which is called analogy iuris (analogy of law). The analogy
applies in particular in civil, commercial, family and procedural law,
it does not apply in particular in substantive criminal law, where the
discretion is represented by the condition of the
material character of the
offense, when it evaluates the degree of offense hazard to
society. If degree of danger to society of offense is
slight or small for example for young people it is not a criminal
offense.
Secondly case-law legal systems of so-called Anglo-Saxon
common law, which is primarily the result of judicial
decisions. In principle stare decisis
thus the stability of the decision applies here, under which a judge is
expected to decide case by case on basis of the legal principles laid
down in previous cases. These principles serve as a precedent. This
precedent should be followed by same court and all lower courts are
subject to the higher court in all future cases. The court may depart
from precedent, if not already in line with logic, fairness and equity (overruling precedent). The court may
further distinguish precedent to decide, that a particular case is not
essentially similar to the earlier precedent and to create a new
precedent (distinguishing precedent).
In the absence of precedent, the judge will create a new precedent
inter alia on the basis of the finding of similar cases in other States
as common law, which are not for him or her binding but persuasive (persuasive), of moral rules, legal
theory, practice, public order, decency and justice (case
of first impression, novel case). In the case of laws in
common law countries there are more general provision, that the judge
often takes the form, he or she adds to their content, he or she is
seeking the legislature intends by examining the text, and contextual
examination based on the reports of committees, committees activities, talks in Parliament, explanatory
memoranda of legislative and executive departments, etc. This court's
decision will
serve in the case law as precedent. While for the law it is
essentially eliminated the retroactive effect(direct
retroactivity), i.e. governs the future situation, for the
court decision it is just the contrary, it is applied to situations
that arose before the case was decided.
Given, that I
tend to monistic learning, which
considers the concept of law as indivisible, which expects future
compliance of all national and international legal systems, it is the
formation of a single law guaranteed legal rules preventing conflict
between legal norms, it is to compare the above two legal systems. Law
is derived from the social relations, of which whole is also
objectively indivisible, it transcends national boundaries. By comparing the legal systems of continental and
Anglo-Saxon case law, we can say, that stability in the
decision-making law is reached in the continental law by
liability of the State authorities by legal rules, in the
Anglo-Saxon law by the stability
of
precedents (stare
decisis). Changes in government bodies decision-making to
reflect changes in society, i.e. changes in economic, political,
sociological and technological state of society it is achieved in both
legal systems by changing laws, by decisions
of constitutional courts, which removes the common
law due to the conflicts with the Constitution and other constitutional
law, in case law by departing from the precedent (overruling precedent). In the absence of
law and precedent in case law the court makes a new precedent (case of first impression, novel case), in
the absence of law in continental law, notably in the Czech legal order
it applies analogy legis or analogy iuris, It's called gaps
in the law.
Regarding the
case, when the Anglo-Saxon case law is to distinguish the precedent (distinguishing precedent), it is, in my
view, the legislation of Czech law inadequate. By Article
2, paragraph 3 of Act. No. 1 / 1993 Coll. Constitution of the ČR State
power shall serve all citizens, i.e. it is necessary to examine the
truth of the phrase: "The legislation of ČR serves all citizens." In my
opinion, this statement is true at present only partially, that
legislation is serving partly to all citizens and some not. The truth we can mark as to me
only the reality (the real world) and the lie
that is not true, and every statement of fact, it cannot cover in its
entirety. It does not affect the reality as whole. In other words,
every statement is partly as fact true, partly as a fact
wrong, i.e. partially lying. It can only be distinguished
mostly true statement, it is a statement, which is mostly
happening, the mostly wrong statement that is largely untrue,
that statement is not in fact (the real world)
mostly happening. We can say, that every man, whether guilty
or innocent, whether friend or enemy, he or she is in his or her words
and thoughts partly right and partly lying. Truth is relative,
absolute, however, in my opinion, is good. Goodness
is the shortest path to compliance of everyone and everything, the
longer we go way towards this goal, the less permanent
increases compliance of each and everything, the less good and greater
evil it is, while in my opinion the consistency of each and all is
inevitable, in my view, chaos must be overcome and to establish an
orderly movement, as to me it is the normative power of reality (see
above). Each of us determines however, when this happens. However, the
knowledge of good as the shortest way for a full harmony of each and
all this is a matter as complex, as it is difficult to know all the
reality, the Being, it is omniscience, there are only certain rules,
mostly true indicators, which suggest to us during this trip, that we
are going well or badly. If it is concerned the true good that
is the shortest path to compliance of each and everything, only time
will show, sometimes it may take tens or hundreds of years, it may be
an example of the reign of communism in the world that lasted for more
than 80 years. These indicators of goodness that is the shortest way
for a full harmony of each and everything that the creator of the laws tried also
to
capture, in my opinion in those legal rules, and the good of the
legislation the Czech legislature expressed not as the compliance of
each and everything, but the condition, that the State power,
therefore, by it enacted legislation, it serves to all citizens.
Statement that
certain legal rules contained in the current Czech government laws
serve all citizens, it is true from the above reasons, only
partially, if it is a fair (good in the above sense) rule, this rule
primarily serves all citizens, one always finds, however, the
situation, where it is not. In other words, there is no rule without
exception. In this case, the Anglo-Saxon case law approaches to
precedent modulation (distinguishing precedent),
continental, virtually Czech legislature should decide in accordance
with this in this particular case unfair rule, which do not
serve all citizens here. From my own experience of a lawyer I can say,
that in the case of Czech judges it does not mostly happen when the
Czech courts in this case deviate from the rule of law in this
exceptionally unjust individual case. I propose, that if circumstances
of the case deserving special consideration the
Czech judge, virtually another public authority was not bound
by the rule contained in the law and he or she could decide in
accordance with analogy legis or analogy iuris as
allowed in the continental
law for
gaps in the law. In this case, however, the State authorities
should detail the reasons of the facts deserving special consideration
and the method of use analogy legis
and analogy iuris in order
to review their decision in deciding remedies. In other words, more
space would be given to discretion of State authority, similarly to
Anglo-Saxon case law.
Literature:
- Teorie
státu a práva, Díl I., doc. Dr.Sc.
Jiří Boguszak, Orbis, Praha 1967.
- Irwin's
business law, Klayman EI, Bagby JW, Ellis NS, publisher Richard D.
Irwin, Inc., USA, 1994.
- Malenovský
J., Mezinárodní právo
veřejné, Doplněk, Brno 1993.
- Vztah
mezinárodního práva
veřejného a soukromého a
vnitrostátního práva z pohledu
upravovaných společenských vztahů, JUDr. Dalibor
Grůza Ph.D., 2006 http://www.e-polis.cz/view.php?id=172&catid=24
- Philosophy of
Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
I / e) Illegal,
virtually counter contractual act
In my opinion infringement is from an objective point of view,
the individual act, that increases the power of disputes at the society
of all. In my view the main purpose of law,
virtually of public (social) contract, is the consistency of
each and everything. From this perspective the valid law may
be viewed objectively, i.e., whether it performs or fails to
fulfill the primary purpose of law and the infringement can be also
defined objectively.
From the above
definition of infringement, that unlawful conduct is not free
and real private contract on issues affecting only a few of
those individuals, because such a contract always reduces
rather than increases the level of disputes at the society of
all, it does not
rise the disputes but an agreement between private parties.
Illegal behavior is
always the actions of private individuals or the public, virtually
people in the concept
of
learning of social
contract theory such as John Locke (1632-1704), which determines the
acts of other persons, contrary to what they would like, or
they want, it is always a form of coercion. However, even if they are
forced, it is not always concerned above infringement from an objective
point of view, the coercion can perform the above main purpose of the law, it can be
objectively legal compulsion. This is so if this individual coercion
decreases power of disputes in the society of all. One can therefore
say, that the infringement is individual coercion of third parties,
with which the strength of disputes at the
society of all increases.
The unlawful
coercion may take place either in the form of private actions of one or
more persons, which is contrary to or not in accordance with the
applicable law, virtually bypasses it, or it may be a constraint of the
public or the law applicable to certain individuals or minorities. It
is always concerned the coercion, which increases the strength of
disputes at the society of all. Case of a
private objectively unlawful coercion may be e.g. an offense, where danger to the community,
of which conduct must be substantially greater than the minimis, or it
must be a behavior, with which objectively the strength of
disputes in society is
increasing more like a little. Case of public
objectively unlawful coercion may be a case which,
although in accordance with applicable law, however the other
individuals are forced by the ruling groups or individuals, which
increases the strength of disputes at the society of all. These are
mainly applicable law, which is contrary to
fundamental human rights and freedoms, as defined by the
constitution of democratic States. In my view at present tt is, also a
case, where the society did not respect the
fundamental right to life of the homeless, or when living creatures
other than humans are considered from the standpoint of law as the thing.
Cause of
different ideas about the real world of individual people who are not
currently able to reach the above agreement according to § 34
et seq. Civil Code, i.e. misguided will of
all people (Volonté de tous) instead of the general will
(Volonté générale) by J.J. Rousseau it
is, in my opinion, especially mismatch of needs and values of the world
we have, another reason is, that we ourselves do not know our
real needs. Our needs are, which forces us to dominate the
greater part of the world, than at any particular moment we just
master. The dispute over the values of the world, it is the subject of
our needs, which is the control and exploitation of living creatures
and inanimate nature, this is the cause. Our real needs are related to
the fact, that we are more or less energetic, living creatures,
energetic live creatures have bigger real needs, the less energetic,
living creatures have lower real needs. If we
can meet our real needs through our current agreement according to
§ 34 et seq. Civil Code, there is no reason not to
agree. If we cannot satisfy these needs, or if we have a mistaken idea
of our real needs, the coercion must take over the role of the
agreement (contract). This constraint should correspond, however, to
our actual needs, so reducing the overall power of disputes at society
of all, or move towards a future agreement under § 34 et seq.
Civil Code. At the same time, in my opinion the need is in
the subconscious of every living creature, together we conquered all
the values of the world, we were together omnipotent, to threaten us no
danger, that we could not turn away. The perfect situation is possible
in the future, at present it is necessary to allocate the world values
(economic goods), so we are approaching as far as possible this State.
From this
perspective it can be distinguished society, virtually States which are
or have been based primarily on objective unlawful conduct of
individuals or the public and society, virtually States that perform or
comply with the above-mentioned purpose of the agreement, i.e. they
steadily decrease disputes at the society of all. History
of humans virtually other creatures is the history of the
unification, where they constantly compete
primarily the unification of present or future agreement of
all social subjects, virtually law (in the case of a future agreement
may be a current violent unification, which corresponds to the real
needs of individuals, thus it reduces the power of disputes at the
society of all) and their mostly
violent unification inadequate to real needs of living
creatures accompanied by wars. Mostly forcibly united Roman
Empire except Italy and Greece, which tried to adapt to the growing
conflicts and wars within the society and outside the society's through
the expansion of freedoms and rights of its members, namely the
transformation of the society, this was not on the basis of the
agreement of the Roman empire members, but their predominantly violent
unification. Christian Middle Ages empires as Holy Roman Empire, the
Habsburg monarchy, the Russian Empire and Arab Empire were based on
partial agreements, based on the religious unity of the Catholic
religion, Orthodoxy and Islam, and only partially on the violent
unification and therefore they are not divided as far as
Rome empire, and they were laying the foundation for future
national States. National capitalist States are partially
consent of the nation and partially violent against impoverished
masses, but they are largely due to the approval of the State citizens
and outside these States the conditions for their transformation into
an ideal society without completely to collapse. The socialist
States were probably predominated by the violent unification over unity
on the agreement, therefore, they could not consistently compete with
the democratic capitalist States.
From the above
concept of law and its rights as a public (social) contract and a
number of private contracts also requirements follow
that can be
placed on objective legal State in the
above sense. It must be a State which gives its inhabitants space,
virtually freedom to conclude contracts both private and public
(social) contract. At the same time, these people should have free
access to information, because only then they can correctly decide,
when they are concluding the above contracts. At the same time the
public (social) contract or the current law should not be clearly harmful to
society, i.e. which increases obviously the power of litigations in
society, in terms of State resident, because in my view it is the
hypothesis or conditions of rule of law allowing people to resist the
valid law. In the latter case they are concerned legal guarantees of
fundamental human rights and freedoms, i.e. the right to life and the
greatest possible freedom, which does not increase the overall strength
of disputes at the society of all, their removal, in my opinion,
increases obviously the power of litigations in society in terms of
individual State resident.
In addition to
State residents, who agree with the public (social) contract i.e. with
the majority, the support for a State, virtually for its valid
law the legal residents
also express,
who do not disagree with the applicable law expressly, but it is
not clearly harmful for them, then they has no reason to rebel
against it. And this part of the population is to some extent the
participants of the above public (social) contract, or applicable law,
which they agree, but not explicitly, but in
silence, implicitly.
Therefore, the State may not do so in the applicable law such
interventions, which would eliminate fundamental
rights and freedoms of citizens, which are subject
to the consent of the often silent majority of the State population.
That the
private and public (social) contract was in line with objective
reality, it is necessary to provide its participants objective
information. Therefore it is necessary guarantee
freedom of the media in the State, that its people could
from a variety of political, scientific and private views to choose one
that best matches the objective reality it is in compliance with each,
but also with everything. Thus, in order to meet the main purpose of
the law, thus it is compliance of each and everything.
Regarding the
method of government, virtually constitutional applicable law, which
the above most of people approves within the adoption of public
(social) contract, virtually applicable law in the State and this
should be left to the will of the people, it
can be both democratic presidential or parliamentary system, but
also authoritarian, dictatorial State, constitutional or
absolute monarchy, but only to satisfy the above conditions, which are
regular free elections, the implementation of fundamental rights and
freedoms, i.e. the right to life and maximum possible freedom and
freedom of information. That the dictator was also aware of
the obligation to appear before the objectively informed people, to ask
them for consent, virtually approval of his or her actions and to
respond for them after possibly lost elections.
Therefore, it
is also in the interest of democratic States to
enforce these conditions
within the international community of States, which can ensure, that
existing law was objectively right and not an infringement. Above
conditions are also enforced by the people, virtually by the public
itself, as the normative power of reality because in the long
term a minority has not the strength to control the majority, in the
long term the market economy is economically stronger than the
State-directed economy, objective information is not permanently to
suppress through the propaganda and the State retreats in
long-term, where violent resistance of the population, whose the
highest possible fundamental rights and freedoms, which do not increase
the overall strength of disputes in society, are suppressed.
Literature:
1) Poměr
uváení a vázanosti
státních orgánů
právními normami, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.,
2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
2.) Vztah
mezinárodního práva
veřejného a soukromého a
vnitrostátního práva z pohledu
upravovaných společenských vztahů,
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.e-polis.cz
,
2006
3) The
Philosophy of Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
4) STORIG, H.J.: Malé dějiny filosofie.
Praha, Zvon, 1991. P. 271 et seq.
5) Budoucnost
práva, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
6.) Smlouva a
donucení, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
I. / f) The future
of law, virtually contract
State is from
the view of (international) law a social, virtually legal relationship
defined by the object, which is the land, subjects, who are citizens,
and legal fiction of sovereign power, with which this legal
relationship is different from private law and which means the
supremacy of law over all persons (individuals) and indirect objects of legal relationships (things) in this
region and non-subordination of the State to another sovereign. In
addition to State we distinguish the law as a set of
enforceable rules of conduct by the State. State
and the law are just the social contract, where the State or the
international community are the social contract of
their entities as legal, virtually social relations and the
law represents their social contract as an enforceable legal
act establishing, changing or terminating (governing) this social
relationship.
The concept of social contract is particularly
prevalent in political thinkers Thomas Hobbes
(1588-1679), John Locke (1632-1704) and Jacques Rousseau
(1712-1788), who have dealt with the establishment
of State. In fact, the social contract embodies the constitutional law
of each country, subject of the social contract, however, are
also other social relationships of private and public nature.
Social contract
by T. Hobbes implies subjugation, and the transfer yet vested
rights in favor of the sovereign, therefore, in regards to the transfer
of sovereignty, which was based at the time of the natural state of
mankind on the individuals, to the selected person or group of
persons. His social contract model
T.
Hobbes characterizes
as a kind of declaration of this kind, "I empower the person or those
persons and I am transferring to them my right to rule over me on
condition, that you also transfer your right and you authorize any
conduct." When it happened, then this amount related to one person is
called the State, in Latin civitas. This is the creation of that great
Leviathan, or better, in terms of that deadly God, whom we
thank under the immortal God for peace and our protection. The man, who
embodies the supreme power, is called the sovereign, and he or she has,
as they say, the supreme power and any other are his or her subjects.
The concept of social contract reflects the enlightened absolutism.
Social Contract by J. Locke implies the establishment of a political body,
which is the people themselves as a community of free and equal
citizens, whose fundamental rights are inalienable and somehow supra
contractual. Unlike Hobbes the people
remains
a source and the bearer of sovereignty after the conclusion of
the social contract, and they do not assign, even
they cannot assign inalienable rights to a third party. His people have
a right to resistance against the State, if the country loses their
confidence. J. Lock distinguishes both the establishment of the social
contract and, secondly, the formation of government institutions. Only
those institutions are legitimate that are based on public consent.
Lock speaks about the exercise of power based on the mandate, principle
of majority and trust of people and also the obligation of the people to respect binding decisions of power
authorities. This concept of social contract is a representative
democracy and constitutional State.
Social Contract by J. J. Rousseau is the legal government based on a convention
or free consent. Each member of society gives his or her person and all
its power as a common good under the highest management of the general
will (Volonté générale). This
generates a mental association as a public person, there are people.
The people are the only bearer of sovereignty. The will of the
sovereign, i.e. general will is to determine by the vote. The level of
understanding of the real interests of society determines then the
degree of freedom of society and of the individual. Imperfect knowledge
can lead to mistakes and will of all (Volonté de tous), it remains only a kind of
subjective perception not describing real interests of the
people and thus deviating from Volonté
générale. The misguided are not in this sense,
people acting freely and they must be forced to be free. And this
coercion does not mean by Rousseau anything other than the forcing to
be free. Rousseau is for a concentration of power, direct democracy and
the imperative mandate. His concept of social contract recalls Marxist
conception of the State.
The concept of law as a contract also reflects
the contemporary Czech law, that
prescribes similar the requirements of architectural elements
of the legal act. E.g. in the Czech Republic it is the consent of the
social contract subjects on behalf of the legislative organs
(cf. ARTICLE 2, paragraph 1 of the
Constitution ČR). Requirements relating to the will, namely
the fact (given), freedom and dignity and the equivalence of the expression and will are provided in the legislative
process in Article 37 et seq. the
Constitution of the ČR and Rules of Procedure of the Chamber
of Deputies and the Senate ČR. In my view legislative process is
analogous to complex contracting process including in particular the
draft of law and its approval. The most important requirement of
freedom of the will against violence and threats are protected
in Article 26 of the Constitution ČR
and also in § 92 of the
Criminal Code the criminal act of subversion against
the Republic. The requirement relating to the object of law as a social
contract specifically its possibility and compliance with morality it
expresses particular Article 2, paragraph 3
of the Constitution ČR, which provides that the State power
shall serve all citizens. The requirement of the elements of expression of the will
reflects Article 52 of
the Constitution ČR, which
provides that the validity of the law is requiring its publication.
Unlike conventional acts, however, the principle of majority, the
assumption of superiority and accuracy of the act apply.
State as legal, virtually social relationship of its
subjects (people), i.e., citizens and other people, of living organisms
other than humans and things (not in the legal sense, which are often
in current law illogically labeled also living organisms other than
humans) it is summary particularly of the
private law relations, i.e. social relations, on which a real
and free agreement and equality of legal subjects are applied. But
it is also summary of public relations, where
applicable subordination of legal entities and State coercion. In my
view in the current State there is a large number of public relations,
which displace incorrectly private
relationships, and the State stands in opposition to the
concept of law as a social contract in the private sense based on
equality of subjects (persons) and their actual and free agreement.
The concept of law and justice as a social
contract embodies in particular the so-called direct democracy represented by complex legal institutes (i.e.,
sets of rules specific to one or more of the legal sectors), where the
people exercise power directly. At present statehood, the direct
democracy does not apply as an exclusive form, always as part of a
representative democracy. In a constitutional form of direct democracy
are considered: 1) people's veto
(Article 75 of the Italian Constitution), which allows people to
express themselves after the Parliament Act, 2) withdrawal of a Member
as an expression of imperative mandate,
3) people's initiative allowing
people to propose or reject the constitutional rules, to express the
constitutive view (Article 120 and 121 of the Swiss Constitution), 4) referendum as the
consultation of voters on the issue or the draft of text, possibly
directly the decision in the matter.
Special place
in the system of constitutional democracy has a referendum. In terms of
its insertion in a particular form of government the referendum
differs: 1) promulgated by the executive (government-controlled
referendum or by the president), when the executive
branch decides, whether the referendum will take place, it
determines the time, subject and formulation of the proposal, 2) ex constitution referendum (required by
the constitution), the referendum should be used for some major changes
of the constitutional or legal rules, the highest constitutional
authorities have yet to determine, when a referendum will be held, 3) initiated referendum by petitions of citizens, when
the initiative for a referendum is the will of the people and depends
on the achievement of signatures number for a petition.
The Czech Republic experienced
series of legislative efforts to enactment of a general referendum. The
referendum provision was contained in §
46 of the Constitutional Charter of the Czechoslovak Republic in 1920.
Under this provision, if the National Assembly refused the Government
bill, the government was entitled to act, that by people´s
voting it was decided, if the government's proposal becomes a law. The
main purpose for this was, that the referendum carried out the
arbitration function between the two houses of parliament, since both
House of Commons and the Senate could cause rejection of the bill.
Implementing law has never been issued. A referendum was therefore just
an empty concept, which remains today.
However, the Article 21, paragraph 1 of the Charter of
Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, adopted by the Federal
Assembly of the 11th January 1990 as a constitutional law it
stipulates, that citizens have the right to participate in the
management of public affairs, directly or through freely choosing their
representatives. A similar provision is contained in Article
25 letter a) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, which is in the Czech
Republic generally binding.
In the Czech
State-legal order there is now fully implemented only the second of the
two cited form of participation of citizens in the management of the
State, i.e. the representative (representative) democracy. The first form, i.e., direct
democracy is not yet generally introduced, only in connection with the
determination of matters of local government it is in Article 86
paragraph 3 of the Constitution and it is the local
referendum in the Act on Municipalities and Act
on City of Prague. The law on local referendum governs
procedure for local referendum. Special Law on the referendum on the
accession of the Czech Republic into the European Union cannot be
counted, because it was not general legislation, but the purpose Act
"on one dispose".
In Europe,
however, there are only few nations, of which law contains no rules of
the referendum. Referendum is covered in one or another form and the
extent by constitutional laws of the many State, inter alia,
in addition to Switzerland, in Austria,
France, Italy, Japan, Denmark, Sweden, Spain, Germany, Hungary, and it
was used in Great Britain. Looking around the world, we
cannot find a single advanced democracy that should not have the
constitutional principle of direct democracy as a complementary part of
its constitutional system.
Under
Article 2, paragraph 3 of Act. No. 1 / 1993 Coll. Constitution
of the ČR State power serves all citizens, according to Czech law it is
also the main purpose of the law to serve all citizens. Given, that I incline to monistic learning, which
considers the concept of law as indivisible, it expects future
compliance of all domestic and
international laws, it is the
formation of a single law guaranteeing legal rules preventing conflict
between legal norms, I think, that the main purpose of this law should
be the consistency of each and all that is good for all its addressees
(natural and legal persons).
In my opinion,
a good as a consistency of each and all means, that in future there is
no mutual collisions of individuals and things, everything will be
dealt with genuine and free consent of all living beings, a sort of
permanent referendum, in which they agree all living beings, that
concerns the question in their lives and under this
agreement the living beings will act. The real and free
agreement will be based on full knowledge of living and inanimate
nature by concerned living beings, therefore, the compliance of
each but also of everything. The continued referendum will be
allowed in future by a perfect communication technology. From this
perspective I see a future justice
in the development of communication technology allowing constant widest
communication (permanent referendum) of affected individuals
concerned with the case and not in limitation or ignorance of
the referendum by Czech politicians, as it often happens today. Development
of communication technology will allow broad application of
the institution of the referendum in the constitutional systems of all
countries, particularly through the development of opportunities of
low-cost electronic means of identification of voters and also thanks
to the possibilities of a continual renewal of their agreement by
electronic means with very low costs. The referendums will take place among the concerned legal parties continuously, permanently and
with very low costs. At the same time there is in my view to extend
freedom of contract of legal entities, namely the dispositivity of
legal rules. At the same time
this
constant referendum (renewal of contract) of the concerned people
provides a solution of social problems at the time of their formation,
there is no suppression of them and growth of disputes.
Consistency of each and everything without
mutual collisions as the main purpose of the law it is indeed an ideal,
a sort of natural law, which we all
would approach in our actions, in fact (in reality) as closer as
possible. On the edge of this issue it is to note that while in my
opinion a greater degree of consistency between all living beings, a
greater degree of agreement in the above mentioned society of all
living beings it makes a greater degree of understanding and mastering
of live and inanimate nature, a greater consistency of each and also of
everything.
Literature:
1.) Poměr
uváení a vázanosti
státních orgánů
právními normami, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.,
2007, www.e-polis.cz
2.) Vztah
mezinárodního práva
veřejného a soukromého a
vnitrostátního práva z pohledu
upravovaných společenských vztahů,
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., www.e-polis.cz ,
2006
3.)
Filosofie rovnováhy, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
4.) KLOKOČKA,
V.: Ústavní systémy
Evropských států. Praha, Linde, 1996.
p. 30 a násl..
5.) STORIG,
H.J.: Malé dějiny filosofie. Praha, Zvon, 1991. p. 271 et seq.
6.)
Klíma, K.: Ústavní právo,
Praha, VICTORIA PUBLISHING, a.s., 1995
7.) Je budoucnost
demokracie v referendech?, Štěpan Kotrba, Britské
listy, 2004, http://www.blisty.cz/2004/5/14/art18121.html
8.)
Malenovský J., Mezinárodní
právo veřejné, Doplněk, Brno 1993
I / g) Natural and just law,
virtually contract
Question what
is the law or, what should it be, is answered in legal science by the philosophy of law.
According to the response to this general question of law it is
possible to distinguish the basic philosophical approaches. Law as justice i.e. natural law
approach, law as a set of norms i.e. the positivist approach,
law as customs i.e. the historical school and law as a balancing of
competing interests i.e. the sociological approach.
Philosophy of
natural law
is
the oldest philosophy of law in Western civilization. Its roots date
back to ancient Greece and many leaders throughout history belong to
it. Among others are the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BC), the
great medieval theologian and philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas (1224-1274),
founder of international law Hugo
Grotius (1583-1645) and political
philosopher, who directly influenced the concept of government
in time of the American Revolution, John
Locke (1632-1704). In addition to the
current leaders of the natural law school.
Representatives
of the natural law philosophy believe in the concept of higher law or
law, which is above human law. Source of higher law is alternately God,
human reason and human nature. This natural law is immutable and
universally binding on all persons at all times. This school has found
its place in institutes of basic human rights and freedoms. Critics of
this approach reject the existence of the binding ideals, which remain
unchanged. According to them, this law is inflexible, unfit to
adapt to a changing society. Furthermore, they reject the possibility
of finding these ideals, which are regarded as not obvious.
Philosophy of
positive law
is
a relatively new philosophy of law presented for the first time by an
Englishman John Austin
(1790-1859). Among its other most important
representatives may be included normativism
of Austrian Hans Kelsen (1881-1973). This
approach is now regarded as
prevalent philosophy of law.
Austin
separated positive law from other "types of law ', as divine law and
moral rules. Austin meant positive law as a set of rules laid down by the political
sovereign. These are the law of people for the people not of God for
men. Positive law concerns the law, which is, not what it should be. As
sovereign commands the positive law provides sanctions against
non-compliance. This philosophy is criticized for its sharp
distinguishing of law and morality. In reality, morality often shapes
the law. It is also criticized for denying the universality of certain
rules, a positive legal attitude does not face the dictatorial and
totalitarian law.
Historic-legal
school based on the
dialectical Hegelian
philosophy, according to which the true is
the development process (as opposed to its findings once and for all),
as well as law is the development process. The law under the historical
school is built on piling habits of certain people and culture. Like
language, art and music are the results of certain national traditions
it is also the case of law. For a proper understanding of the law the
historical research based on the development of national traditions and
approaches is needed. Leading representative of this school was German Karl von Savigny (1779-1861).
Historic-legal school was recognized for its contribution to historical
studies of law and criticized for its connection with one philosophical
school and nationalism
emphasizing national
traditions and the uniqueness of national history.
Sociological
approach is presented
among others in Anglo-American legal region by such an American Roscoe Pound (1870-1964). Also
in the continental law by German
Max Weber (1864-1920) and his sociology of
law. Sociologist Pound sees the law as an attempt to balance competing
societal interests - i.e. the various demands and wishes of human
beings either as individuals or as groups. This approach deals with
real social implications of legal institutions and it places emphasis
on the social interest, which the law serves more than the penalty.
Commonly used techniques are statistics and opinion polls.
Sociological
approach is appreciated for the obvious exclusion of various social
interests, which the law must try to balance. Criticism is directed
against the tendency to pragmatism in terms of practical usefulness of
the law, against normativeness aspect or the attainment of certain
ideals. For example, if the research determines, that the vast majority
of children are ungrateful, the question is whether legislation is
consistent with the general opinion to cancel current duty to maintain
of descendants or, conversely, to enforce this obligation against the
current opinions. Sociology provides the information, that the
legislature is considering and, on which decisions are made.
In my view the
goal of ideal, virtually natural law
as well as the ideal State as a social or the legal relationship it is
to be closer to the private law, it is the law, where the sole role has
the agreement of equal entities. Ideal,
virtually natural law so in my opinion is
consistent with social
contract as a private institute, which
provides resolution of all social relations in an ideal society based
on free and genuine agreement of all interested legal entities. Such a
uniform and free will in a real State, however, is unattainable ideal,
which we can only approach in just law.
Prerequisites to achieve this
natural, virtually ideal law are these as to me:
1) Free and genuine agreement of all
persons, only then it is
sustainable and not threatened by illegal activities such as theft,
murder, etc.
2.) The
subjects of this agreement shall be all living organisms, because
it would not be a sustainable power because of resistance of these
organisms complaining.
3.) Omnipotence of all living
organisms acting in mutual agreement, because
the only way, that power is the maximum and sustainable not threatened
with this agreement complaining organisms and material phenomena.
Omnipotence implies a complete knowledge and mastery of nature.
This is the
ideal of natural law, which we try in a real society only to approach.
To actual society, virtually State, however, this ideal is very remote,
because feasible ideal at a particular time
is not a natural law, but only fair law as maximum
sustainable approach to natural law so, as I said
above. The concept of fair justice builds upon the concept of the
material world as a transitional phase of incoherent world of subjects
and objects sooner than a coherent world that is consistent with each
and all, to restore the natural law, which is continuous unity of people and
things, it is with the single mind of a legal entity, which
is necessary to approach gradually and to bring a
natural law by it.
How to be
closer to the natural law in a fair
applicable law. The applicable law must be fairly
based on the character of natural law as future agreement of everybody
in line with each and everything, so it must be primarily responsible
for free and genuine will of every living creature, i.e. clear to prefer the private law based on free and genuine
will of every living creature and their agreement with the other living
creatures. Most legally capable living creatures should
choose the equitable legal (State) coercion of other live
creatures
only in the event, that their conduct they consider as the most
probably damaging to the society of all to be in compliance with
everything. This is the fair legal coercion by
the majority of legally capable living creatures which, in my view, has
the natural law adequately to make other
living creatures to act in their view mostly probably beneficial to
society and to punish conduct in their view, mostly probably
detrimental to society, if the impossibility of achieving the
same by freedom and real agreement within the meaning of private law.
For the society mostly probably harmful applicable law or
behavior of a private entity is mostly probably increasing
conflicts with the natural law as described below, the mostly probably
beneficial behavior for the society reduces mostly probably and relaxes
these conflicts.
In addition to
fair law, which is ideally identical to the applicable law, there is
also actual (not just legal) coercion
of living creatures, especially when concluding contracts, which should
nevertheless be consistent with the fair applicable law. In the case of
this de facto coercion, which is left by the fair applicable law in a free and true will
of living creatures, and these entities should or need not (this is moral imperative) act
mostly probably in view of individual not to increase conflicts with
the natural law as described below.
If a living creature is not able to assess
clearly, whether or mostly probably to be closer or away to
recognizable content of natural law set out below, he or she has the
inherent right to act according to their free and genuine will,
therefore, according to their nature.
Consequently,
unfair public contract, or unfair applicable
law, for which the principle of majority applies, not justify
unjust coercion clearly harmful to society in
terms of individual, it is an obvious increase in
litigations, collisions in society associated with each such individual
forcing, which must be for a substantial degree of injustice remedied
by legal means, namely by a public contract of minority and majority,
and in case of impossibility of legal also by extra-legal means.
Materiality of level for legal intervention or intervention through
extra-legal means it justifies, that, in my view, in the case of minor
hazards it is sufficient normative force of natural development of
reality to eliminate the minor risk. Contradiction with the facts
sooner or later it forces a participant to leave the view clearly
harmful to society, as described above. Fair coercion based on the will
of individuals or small group of people in any society it should be
limited to cases of law, virtually behavior from their point clearly
harmful or beneficial to society.
In the case of
the above using of fair coercion by
individuals, private groups or State at society of all in case
of obviously harmful law or the imperfection of law as an
enforceable public (social) contract, which calls for enforcement, for
example in the case of international law at present or in the case law
forcing individuals it should be concerned reasonable
constraints, i.e. to apply the principles of
national law known as principles of
subsidiarity and proportionality in case of extreme emergency and
legitimate self-defense. In an extreme emergency and necessary defense,
the violence can avert this danger, if it is direct, not otherwise
avertable, a consequence of this action, which is not obviously more
harmful than the effect that threatens from this danger. In the case of
above using non-legal means due to fail of the applicable law the
principles apply also with the difference, that danger is not imminent,
it can also be a remote risk that cannot be averted otherwise. This
follows from the fact, that in averting the dangers involved in extreme
distress or need defense in the domestic law it is always possible in
case of remote danger to ask for assistance the components
of State authority, which have the duty and power to intervene
effectively. In the event of failure of justice, however, this
obligation and the power to intervene effectively are not given, either
because of imperfections in the case of international law, which still
has not constituting a sovereign State or international Federations
possibly Confederation, or in the case of an unjust State system,
virtually law which is clearly harmful to society (see above).
Principle of undamaging result is controversial and obvious after the
completion using non-legal means, it is necessary to mention other
well-known national law principle, which will help us to assess
compliance with the principles of undamaging results using non-legal
means before and during the use of non-legal means. This next rule is the principle, that, when it
is used the coercion, it may not increase conflicts with the following
described natural, ideal law, it must be the alleviation of these
inconsistencies, the approach to that law not to be away the below
mentioned natural, ideal law.
Regarding currently identifiable content of natural
law as a future real and free contract of everyone
within the meaning of private law in accordance with everything, which
in a fair applicable law and behavior we seek ever to be
closer through a constant reduction in collisions, disputes in
society of all living creatures and everything, so in my opinion this
currently knowable content of natural law can be described, that it was not obviously harmful conduct for society in
terms of any living creature and in a way, that the
obligations were performed,
that contain
obviously beneficial action for society in terms of every living
creature otherwise
let do everyone, what he or she wants.
It remains to
define, what I understand obviously beneficial and harmful actions to the society
in
terms of every single living creature. This obviously beneficial and
harmful conduct within the natural, ideal law must be based on the query to each individual living creature on
its real needs, from, which he or she is willing not to withdraw in any
case due to the above assumptions of natural law as a free and genuine
agreement of everyone about everything within the
meaning of private law. These requirements can also be defined as the
requirements placed on aspects of an ideal world, virtually
law in terms of everybody, what it must be absolutely and what it must
not be absolutely. More precise
definition of these requirements arising from the responses of living
creatures within the contract formation process of the
natural, ideal law and their summary to legal sentences we get
the content of natural law. Individual living creatures that cannot
understand the question and answer, it must be based on their
hypothetical responses expressed by their eligible representatives.
My answer to
the question what I require absolutely from natural law,
virtually from in terms of all ideal society, is:
Unconditionally I do not want unnecessarily
to suffer and die living creatures. Unconditionally I do not want, that gradually the life
and health of any person, animal, plant, fungus or other
living creature were threatened unnecessarily seriously.
Unconditionally I want to use science and
genetic code all the living creatures would be resurrected without
undue delay, that want to live and they died, or, that they did not die.
Absolutely I want to be the most satisfied
the needs of all living creatures (which in my view, depends
on the vigor, energy see the following texts in the literature) with
the free and genuine consent of the affected
individuals. Absolutely I want, that my
life partner was with me alive, if she so wished and she was faithful
forever. Other unconditional demands, which, together with my
demands should determine the content of an ideal natural law,
which in a fair applicable law and behavior we try as closely
as possible, they should come from anonymous
sociological survey with the polls for all the
people, what individual people want necessarily as the content of the
natural, ideal law in the terms of everybody ideal society.
To the above it
should be added, that the purpose of any behavior of any living
creature at the society of all in relation to everything it is permanently to reduce the mutual collisions, and to
bring the reality nearly with no collisions in the form of contracts of
each about all and that is the above natural, ideal
law or in terms of each ideal society. Where the free and
genuine agreement of all the living creatures is not possible to
achieve within the meaning of private law, the
just legal as well as other
constraint to this agreement starts in the
form of the above collisions, and sometimes by the living creatures,
but always by inanimate reality (it is to be said about a normative power of reality or Divine Providence how,
for who it is better suited). However prior
knowledge of the outcome of the above fair coercion or it
representing collisions
it
is always uncertain, because,
according to the rule that everything relates to everything, we should
know all the objective and subjective conditions of reality, we should
be omniscient. Therefore one can speak only about a mostly probable
outcome in the case of a fair law or factual constraint and about the
apparent result in the case of currently identifiable content
of natural law, as the above.
The concept of
law as a social contract, in my view, is a synthesis of all the above
legal-philosophical approaches. As in the natural law philosophy the
duality of natural and positive, virtually applicable law is to
maintain. In accordance with the philosophy of positive law a
contractual definition of law merely
is
limited to the concepts and phenomena from the positive, virtually
applicable law. Furthermore, like the historical school one may
understand the social contract through the historical
interpretation, since the current wording of the social contract is the
result of regular changes of the
earlier text. As the sociological approach, a social
contract is by definition a social phenomenon, the subject of
sociological research can then be particularly the above content of the natural, ideal
law and other factors. It should be noted that the sociological
approach goes beyond boundaries of the legal science and it presents
the issues of related discipline.
Literature:
Irwin’s
business law, Klayman E.I., Bagby J.W., Ellis N.S., publisher Richard
D. Irwin, inc, USA, 1994.
Philosophy of
Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
Vztah
mezinárodního práva
veřejného a soukromého a
vnitrostátního práva z pohledu
upravovaných společenských vztahů, JUDr. Dalibor
Grůza Ph.D., www.e-polis.cz , 2006
Poměr
uváení a vázanosti
státních orgánů
právními normami, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.,
2007, www.e-polis.cz
Budoucnost
práva, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, www.e-polis.cz
Smlouva a
donucení, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, www.e-polis.cz
Filosofie
ekonomického prava, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.,
2007, www.e-polis.cz
Spravedlivá
válka (bellum iustum), JUDr. Dalibor Grůza
Ph.D., 2007, www.e-polis.cz
II.
SPECIAL PART
II.
/ A) Philosophy of economic law
In
my view, the goal of an ideal State, virtually ideal or
natural law as a social or the legal relationship is to be closer to
the private law, it is the law, where the sole role of the agreement of
equal entities. In my opinion ideal State is
so identical with social contract as a
private institute, which enables resolution of all social
relations in an ideal society based on free and genuine agreement of
all interested legal entities. Such a uniform and free will is in a
real State, however, unattainable ideal, which we can approach in
fact
only.
In
my opinion prerequisites to achieve this ideal State,
virtually natural law, are next: Free
and genuine agreement of all persons, only
then it is sustainable and not threatened by illegal
activities such as theft, murder, etc. The
bodies of this agreement shall be all living organisms,
because it would not be a sustainable power because of resistance of
these complaining organisms. Omnipotence
of all living organisms acting in mutual agreement, because the
only way, that power is the maximum and sustainable power due to the
resistance with this agreement complaining organisms and
material phenomena. Omnipotence implies a
complete knowledge and mastery of nature.
In
my opinion in terms of closest
approach to the above-mentioned ideal State it is to express following economics
maxima, which should apply in the legal relations
arising in economy of the society. This maxima stay in today's
society
against each other, they cannot be in the
current situation seemingly fulfilled together and in my
opinion the purpose of society is the greatest approach to these
economic maxims.
Economic
maxima:
1)
The society should ensure, that the assets of all individuals meet
their needs.
In
my opinion cause of different ideas about the real world
of individual people, who are not currently able to reach the above-mentioned free and genuine
agreement it is especially mismatch of needs and values of the world, we have,
another reason is, that we ourselves do not know our real
needs. Our needs are, which forces us to dominate the greater part of
the world, than at any particular moment we just master. The dispute
over the values of the world i.e. the subject of our needs, which is
the control and exploitation of living creatures and inanimate nature,
this is the cause. Our real needs related to the fact, that we are more
or less energetic, living creatures, energetic live creatures have
bigger real needs, the less energetic living creatures have a lower
real needs. Energetic
individuals with greater needs, through these needs they are then
forced to acquire property in legal and failing to achieve even in
illegal ways. Therefore a society that does not allow these energetic
individuals with great needs to acquire property, shall be in
various forms of theft of property, disputes and wars, which implies
the requirement that above first economic maximum.
From
the above first economic maximum then further economic and legal
requirements stem. These include the requirement of the
delegation of assets of third persons to such energetic
individuals, where they achieve the greatest gains thanks to the
aforementioned high energy and the resulting large needs. This is done
through their managerial positions in various legal
entities managing third persons assets. Furthermore it is such
a free market, that allows these energetic individuals to contract
freely and lawfully to acquire property.
An
important requirement arising from the above economic maximum it is
then that an individual, who has a large enough energy and the
resulting large needs, has been directed by
the society to
activities, that bring the greatest benefit to the whole society and
not just to the individual, as in cases of various forms of seizure of
third persons property without full compensation (e.g. various forms of
theft of property). To obtain the correct direction of energetic
individuals in society it is essential the widest possible access to
education and insurance of individuals in the event of failure to pay
the costs of their education after its completion. The division of
levels of education according to complexity it
also comes into account, where every individual can opt for an
education, that suits their abilities.
Another
important requirement arising from the above economic maximum is the
property transfers to mitigate the obvious social contradictions
resulting from the fact, that an individual (especially the young, old
or disabled) is not themselves able and the society have not been able
them to achieve the personal legal (i.e., in their favor and the
society as a whole) profit, which would match his or her energy,
virtually resulting from his or her needs they should receive from the
society kind of ransom for it, and safeguarding the society from their
unlawful conduct, and it indemnifies him or her, that he or she was not
allowed by the society to find their place in society, which would
enable him or her to transform his or her energy into personal legal
(i.e. for his or her own benefit and also of the whole
society) profit. This self evidence of mitigation of conflicts in the
society by transfer of property without full compensation may take the
form of social benefits approved by a persons majority of the public
person or of donation or succession, particularly when the private
property transferor sees a large unmet needs and unused energy
of individual, who cannot find his or her place in the society, and it
threatens him or her and the society as a whole. Linked to this the
requirement is, that
the punishment for energetic individuals, who their big and legally forced
not realizable needs
to infringement, it was based on the principle of compensation, i.e.
replacing the diminished property and loss of profits, but also adding
the above-mentioned ransom.
To
the aforementioned ransom the category of marginal utility of general
economy
theory is
related, which justifies the need of social benefits, that the
providing of one monetary unit rise meeting of the needs of individuals
with large unmet needs more than an individual with low unmet
needs. And the individuals with large unmet needs are usually
considered socially weak as recipients of social benefits. At the same
time to approach a free and genuine agreement in the ideal
society of all individuals it implies, that the marginal
usefulness in providing a crown (of Czech currency) of social benefits
it was greater than, when it is spent by any other means, therefore,
with each unit of money expended it would grow as much as possible to
meet the needs of society of all individuals.
2)
The society should guarantee the inviolability of property, from both
the State and other private individuals.
At
present this economic maximum is seemingly contrary to the above
maximum economic ad.1.) and also to the following economic maxims.
Examples of the current conflict are both the different asset transfers
without full compensation enforced by the State, as well as by private
individuals and various forms of theft of property (see ad.1.)). In my
view the State should enforce a uniform property transfers
without full compensation to defend the inviolability of property from
the point of view to defend the values of other subjects such as life,
health, honor, dignity and the environment. In addition, the State
should impose a uniform property transfers on other activities
resulting from this article and required by law, I have particularly in
mind the social benefits arising from the needs of human solidarity,
i.e. the aforementioned ransom (see ad.1) and
living wage benefits, benefits for health
care in the here-mentioned extent and for education. From the
above economic maximum follows the requirement, that the State should
enforce the mandatory insurance of expensive and significantly risky
activities.
3)
The society should make each individual to maximize their personal
profit while socially useful work, in the ideal society in particular
causing the least possible death and pain by each perfect individual.
In
my view personal profit from the work of individuals, which does not
meet also the characteristics of different forms of theft of property
(i.e. not contracted transfer of property without full compensation),
it is also socially beneficial gain. In other words, the statutory
income of individuals enriching the entire society. The highest
statutory profit also requires the best use of energy both of
individuals and things, which the society has, that the work of
individuals (movement) would not collide but to cooperate, it is a
requirement of the most efficient division of labor.
Means
of the energy evaluation of an individual in a socially beneficial
activity, i.e. the social constraints to maximize the legal personal
gain, it should be from the State in particular social and health
system. Forced social transfers property without full compensation
should be limited to the aforementioned ransom (see ad.1.)) and further
a motivating living wage and to free health care to the extent
necessary (see ad.4.)). Only then the individual will be forced by
State through their needs, virtually directed to use their power to
enrich themselves and thus all.
4)
The society should ensure, that no individual will be seriously
jeopardized on the life and health because of the lack.
From
this economic maximum the requirements of the compulsory health
insurance
follow, but also the State's duty to provide in
accordance with the aforementioned economic maxims (see ad. 1) to 4)) a
necessary treatment for each individual, whose health is seriously
endangered and is not covered by health insurance, here I am thinking
in particular the treatment of poor or homeless people or other people,
which is not covered for its cost or other reasons from health
insurance. In my opinion regarding not serious health risks of
individuals, health care security can be maintained from their economic
activity with the fact, that they are forced in terms of economic
maximum ad.3.) to the highest socially useful and personally
profit job. From this economic maximum a requirement is also
to enable a broad social charity. In a broader sense of this economic
maximum a requirement shows for
compulsory social insurance of pension, invalidity, unemployment and
sickness insurance to ensure an individual's property in case of
property shortage while saving costs for the payment of State social
benefits. Furthermore, in
turn
this maximum requires the
social benefits of subsistence.
Overcoming the current contradictions and full
compliance with the above economic maxims in fact it is only in an
ideal society based solely on the actual and free agreement of all
individuals, where
all the power of individuals will be voluntarily (and not forced by the
State) used by an individual for his or her own benefit as well as
society. In this ideal society there would not be forced property
transfers, whether by States or private persons, i.e. there would not
be taxes or various forms of theft of property (not contracted property
transfers without full compensation). All necessary transfers of
property without full compensation for the benefit of society the
individuals would make voluntarily on the basis of free and genuine
agreement of all affected individuals.
Literature:
1)
The Philosophy of Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
2.)
Vztah mezinárodního práva
veřejného a soukromého a
vnitrostátního práva z pohledu
upravovaných společenských vztahů,
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.e-polis.cz,
2006
3.)
Poměr uváení a vázanosti
státních orgánů
právními normami, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.,
2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
4.)
Budoucnost práva, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
5.)
Smlouva a donucení, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
II. / B) Philosophy
of marital law
Together with a life partner or partners,
whether we are married or not married, we share gradually
visible things as property, body, speech, and also still more perfectly
invisible things (i.e. us forming part of reality, a real
world), with which we are thus uniting not only in sensory perception,
i.e. images of the visible world (i.e. in the world of experiance) but
also in the invisible world (i.e. the real world), that in all parts of
the self we are merging gradually more perfectly with him or her or
them into one (in the world of experiance and in the real
world).. In the event,
that with our partner or partners in something or in all we do not
agree, i.e. when we are in dispute or when we fully leave one another,
it is necessary to look at him or her and to treat with him or her, as
soon as we become mutually as a living creature and this
creature the closest creatures in the world, who are gradually more
perfectly sharing each
other
with our sensory input in single soul on the basis of the free and
genuine agreement (in a single world of experiance, the visible world)
that is, like with any other living or dead creature.
The soul
(psyche, thoughts, feelings) of every living creature is imperfect
image, the reflection of the world (different worlds of experiance by
the philosopher Kant, I.), the truth contained in the mind, the soul of
every living creature cannot completely cover the whole world, this
image is never entirely consistent with reality (the real world by the
philosopher Kant, I.). The challenge of living creatures is at everyday
life in any relationship to all living creatures and inanimate nature,
to reconcile all of these images (the world of experiance of all
individuals) in a single overall picture of reality (in a single world
of experiance) that best describes a fact (real world), eliminating all
conflicts of common sensorial, virtually mental pictures of reality of
every living creature, through their free and genuine agreement,
corresponding to their actual needs (see article on the philosophy of
economic justice www.e-polis.cz ). If this
agreement is not possible then the violence enforcement corresponding
actual needs of all living creatures affected by violence aimed at
achieving a future agreement between them, which condition is, that the
violence reduces as much as possible sustained the overall strength of collisions among all
individuals and inanimate nature in the Universe. Besides the violence,
forcing conscious individuals, there is violence, coercion of
unconscious objective reality (it is sort of normative power
of reality), which reduces also the overall strength
of collisions in this fact,
it increases its consistency. Then we get the correct picture of
reality, the nearest to the truth (the invisible real world), the
closest to any real needs (see above) of all living creatures. This is
still truer picture of reality (the invisible real world) resulting in
more harmonic still sharing ideas (soul, psyche, different worlds of
experiance) of all existing creatures with the birth, the Resurrection
(e.g. from DNA of existing cell during advancement of science) of still
new living creatures it will enable us to act and feel to percept the world
(to
appear in the soul) increasingly in line with reality (the
invisible real world), still more sophisticated to control over
inanimate nature, and to eliminate the suffering in the world caused by
inanimate nature, such as natural disasters or other failure of dead
and living reality. This is only a gradual sharing of thoughts,
feelings in a single soul of all living creatures (in a single world of
experiance), it is a perfect good, which we are gradually closer
When we are
asked, where to find this invisible world (the real world by I. Kant),
one can answer, that it is wanted by man since the beginning of
history. At first in the religion it was searched by using abstract
concepts like God, heaven, hell, and from them formed doctrines, and
later through exact (i.e. measurable) concepts by the exact science which constructed a microscope and a telescope
to see, that there are planets, stars, Universe, on the one hand, and
living cells, bacteria, viruses, atoms, etc. on the other side. In my
opinion you cannot stop at these findings also in philosophy and we can
be assumed, that every person is composed of micro-organisms (their
sociology should be
examined) and those of real existing space-time points, which are
forming currently from our point of view the invisible world (the real
world by I. Kant) and from which both all visible forms of
matter and emptiness are made and which display best abstract concept
of energy that both science and the many spiritual teachings use.
Life partners,
whether married or not, aligning thus both the above-mentioned
visible world (such as property, family and sex, etc.) as well as the
above invisible world (the real world by I. Kant). Therefore in my
opinion, the approach of some States is fully justified they have no
further claim to girlfriend and boyfriend to declare them as spouses,
if living together as husband and wife for a long time because I think
that, in my view cohabitation itself has the effect of such a visible
and invisible harmony. E.g. common law marriage in some States, which
arises under 1) cohabitation-intention to live together as man and wife
until death split them apart, 2) presentation-behavior in public as
husband and wife, 3) acceptance - adoption by community as husband and
wife, 4) legality-lack of legal obstacles
as a marriage of a partner, etc.
For the same
reason before the divorce, the separation of spouses for a long time should come, since the couple, who is
so visibly and invisibly united, needs some more time to consider,
whether to divorce and permanently to revoke such a visible and invisible connection, that
it would be gradually canceled without that the sudden
collapse of the visible and invisible marital connections causes to one
or the other spouse the irreparable damage. Just, in my
opinion, the spouses may divorce and remain friends, which is
desirable especially, if they have children. As friends they would
therefore maintain a common view of the world (the visible
world
of experiance by I. Kant of both spouses) to continue to create
possibly ever closer to approach to an ideal society based solely on
the free and genuine agreement of all their affected individuals.
Above
requirement of prolonged separation of spouses and only on the basis of
its outcome the subsequent divorce to some extent it is respecting
existing Czech law, which provides in § 24b of Act. No.
94/1963 Coll. about the family that the application for divorce, which
disagrees the husband, who has not commited the breakdown of marriage
duties and who would be caused particularly serious harm, the court
does not pass, if exceptional circumstances speak in favor of
preserving marriage. However, if the spouses do not live for more than
three years together, the divorce is decided by the court, if the
conditions laid down in § 24 of the Act meet, i.e., especially
if marriage is so deeply and permanently broken, it cannot be expected
to restore marital cohabitation.
In my view
particularly serious injury is almost always caused to
innocent spouse, often due to infidelity of the other
spouse, then decay both of visible and invisible
reality of marriage (see above) occurs. The court should really consider in particular for the above
reason, whether the decay of these aspects of the marital connection
were done or whether the process the court could still slow through the
separation of spouses such as the duration of the divorce proceedings,
or also refusing an application for divorce before the
statutory period of 3 years, etc., if in the interest of the spouses.
This is so, if at the time of the court's decision on divorce in fact
the visible and invisible reality of marriage still did not completely collapse, while if the
marriage at least one of the spouses
wants.
In this case in my view the statutory requirement of exceptional
circumstance should be filled in favor of preserving marriage.
In my opinion,
so § 24b Act No. 94/1963 Coll., which allows preservation of
marriage, is responding to the fact, that courts are often divorcing
marriage without being able reliably to predict the requirement of
§ 24 paragraph 1 Act about the family, i.e. a deep and lasting
disruption of marriage, which excludes the renewal of marital
cohabitation. Court opinion must be based on the greater probability of
non-renewal of marital cohabitation, which, however, may not be in fact
true. This is so because no man, nor a judge cannot reliably predict
future developments, who would need to cover their entire knowledge of
the reality, that all causes and to be able to derive from them all the
consequences, because in my opinion, everything relates to everything.
When both
spouses agree seriously,
definitely, clearly, really and freely with divorce of broken marriage,
which should be sooner known for sure, that one of the spouses did not
act in particular as the error, under duress or in distress, in my
opinion the marriage should
be divorced. Renewal of marriage should be available both on
the basis of a formal union, and informally, if the
spouses lived together as husband and wife for a long time
even after the divorce (see above common law marriage).
Therefore, it
is not yet to enact as an applicable law the rule of Catholic canon law, which
provides indissolubility of marriage, in the words of Jesus in the New
Testament Bible: "And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?. Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder." In my view now it can be a decay of
marriage in the visible and invisible reality, even with
near-total collapse, when there is no hope for renewal of marital
cohabitation. In this situation we have no right to
force husband to stay married. At the same time a frequent
cause of this collapse it is the fact, that one or both spouses will
find a counterpart, with whom they are able to reconcile in the visible
and invisible reality better than current husband. They are determined
for each other. Therefore in my view currently we need prior to divorce
of the marriage the prolonged period of separation, this time will
tell, if the right life partner is, with whom the husband shall be
perfectly linked in marriage in the visible and invisible reality, the
original spouse or a new lover.
To the
above-mentioned need of divorce the Roman Catholic canon law responds then.
Commonly spoken in the history about the so-called religious divorce,
which was largely a marriage annulment or a termination from the
special cases of marriage, in my opinion the non-enactable principle of indissolubility marriage in the
currently applicable law is often bypassed by the Roman Catholic church
law. Unless the conditions of marriage the marriage may be declared invalid by religious court (invaliditas,
nullitas). Religious termination of marriage (dissolutio vinculi) is
possible with 1) non-perfection of marriage it was not consummated by
intimate contact (modo humano) (CAN 1142 Code of Canon Law), 2) based
on the privilege of faith, according to the Pauline principle (1
Corinthians 7 12-15 New Testament can. 1143 et seq. the Code of Canon
Law) the valid marriages between new baptized and not baptized person may be loosed
by conclusion of at this time religious marriage, 3) in favor
of faith-in favore fidei it is concerned the termination of not holy marriage (between not baptized)
by Pope (privilege petrinum) under a special law called the
Instructio pro solutione matrimonii in favore fidei of 6/12/1973.
Furthermore, the Catholic law allows termination of the marital
community of marriage (separatio manente Vincula) according to the can.
1151 Code of Canon Law, in the past by the General Civil Code of 1811
(ABGB) this institution was called a divorce from the table and the bed
and it would only be allowed as separation of spouses in the marriage
of Catholics. This was after the First World War resulting in a large
number of factual unions without the marriage, which was in the First
Czechoslovak Republic solved by the marital amendment Act. No.
320/1919 Coll., which permitted divorce in today's sense.
In an ideal society based on natural law, which
means that the society will decide, virtually resolve all issues on the
basis of free and genuine agreement of all the subjects who are all
live creatures, which in my view will mean compliance of each and
everything, it will be possible to speak of unity and indissolubility
of marriage within the meaning of Roman Catholic law. I.e. spouses are
perfectly in harmony with reality in the visible reality (property,
body, etc.), and together with the other living creatures they will be
in harmony also in invisible reality, i.e., mentally, their common
sense and thought image of the reality will enable them
resolution of all issues on the basis of free and genuine
agreement (the basis of natural law). In the case of the existence of
such a harmony of each and everything grounds for termination, or
divorce of marriage will not be also as an argument, illness,
suffering, pain, infidelity and death of spouses, it will be talking
about indissolubility of marriage, virtually of living partnership of
all individuals. In my view this ideal society every living creature
would
approach in the
real society as closely as possible. In my opinion
Roman Catholic canon law would be in its guidelines on marriage rather
to fulfill the role of this ideal, the above natural law, to which we are trying to approach
in the applicable law as a result of an increasingly free change in the
behavior of members of society (see my other articles www.e-polis.cz
) and it should not be ideologized by the
current State as complete physical enforcement in the applicable law in
the form of merging the current State and the Roman Catholic Church.
Literature:
Irwin's
business law, Klayman EI, Bagby JW, Ellis NS, publisher Richard D.
Irwin, Inc., USA, 1994
Církevní
právo, Doc. JUDr. Rajmund Tretera, Jan Krigl,
nakladatelství, Praha, 1993
Philosophy of
Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
Vztah
mezinárodního práva
veřejného a soukromého a
vnitrostátního práva z
pohledu upravovaných společenských
vztahů, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.e-polis.cz/
,
2006
Poměr
uváení a vázanosti
státních orgánů
právními normami, JUDr. Dalibor
Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz/
Budoucnost
práva, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz/
Smlouva a
donucení, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz/
Filosofie
ekonomického práva, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza
Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz/
Spravedlivá
válka (bellum iustum), JUDr. Dalibor
Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz/
II. / C) Guilt,
Crime and punishment
Under the provisions of § 3 of the
Criminal Code No. 140/1961 Coll. the
criminal offense to society is a dangerous act, of which characters are
listed in this Code. Offense, which the degree of danger to society is
negligible, is not a criminal offense, even though it has other
characters of a criminal offense. The criminality of the act must be
intentional fault, unless the law expressly states, that a sufficient
fault of negligence. The degree of hazard for the offense is determined
by particular importance of the protected interest, which was prejudiced
by
an act, the manner of transposition of act and its consequences, the
circumstances under which offense was committed, a person of the
perpetrator, the degree of his or her fault and his or her motives.
Offense is thus defined
both by formal character, which is
a presumption, that the conduct, which fills the formal characters in
the criminal law, is a criminal offense. And always also material
character has to add, which is the danger of this crime to
society. This is so because there no general legal rule
is without exception.
In my view
regarding the case, when the Anglo-Saxon case law is to distinguish the
precedent (distinguishing precedent)
the legislation of Czech law is inadequate. By Article
2, paragraph 3 of Act. No. 1 / 1993 Coll. Constitution of the ČR State
power shall serve all citizens, it is necessary to examine the
truth of the phrase: "The legislation of ČR serves all citizens." In my
at present opinion, this statement is true only partially, that
legislation is serving partly to all citizens and some not. The truth can indicate only as to me the
reality (the real world) and lies
that is not true, and every statement of fact, cannot cover in its
entirety, it does not affect the reality as a whole, in other
words, every statement is partly as fact true, partly as a fact
wrong, i.e. partially lying. Mostly true statement can only be
distinguished it is a statement which is mostly happening and partially
wrong, and statement that is largely untrue, that statement is in fact
(the real world) mostly not happening. We can say, that every man,
whether guilty or innocent, whether friend or enemy, he or she is in
his or her words and thoughts partly right and partly lying.
Truth is relative, absolute, however, in my opinion, the good is. Goodness is the shortest path to
compliance for all and everything, the longer way towards this goal we
go, the less permanent increases of compliance of each and everything,
the less good and greater evil it is (see my article The relationship
between the discretion and liability of State authorities by law rules
on http://www.e-polis.cz/
)
In case of material character
of the offense, i.e. of a danger of behavior to the society
an act must be concerned that reduces the compliance of each and
everything that increases the number of unnecessary collisions and
conflicts in society it may not also be a slight change. However, this
cannot be entirely captured by the general rule, there will always be exception, the legal presumption is not valid,
that the conduct, which meets the formal characters of a criminal
offense, is also as dangerous to society as a slightly more. Therefore, in
my view, the material character of the offense, that its danger to
society, if this offense achieves in the criminal law mentioned formal
characters, it should be in this Code referred to as rebuttable
legal presumption for acts, which fulfill the
formal characters
of
a crime referred to in this Code.. All law enforcement proceedings
organs, the accused and his or her lawyer should have the duty and
right to refute this legal presumption in the case, that this action
did not constitute more like a slight unnecessary increase in conflicts of society.
Now to the
reasons for committing crimes. Command to all the action that is also
conduct, which meets the facts of a crime, is given to man by a brain.
If a man wants through their will, mind or emotions to prevent him or
her from commitment of a crime, this is done again through the order of
the brain. If one has wrong idea about the reality it is contained in
the brain again. Man alone cannot influence the content inside of his
or her brain and orders, without giving the idea or the command his or
her brain again.
Imperfection of the brain, which itself is either bad (sick), or has a
bad input data and which he or she cannot recognize by their conflict
with the right data it is the sole cause of any crime. In my view
Imperfection of the brain can be corrected by the right education,
experience, i.e., when through the logical connection ever expanding
amount of input data, experience stored in an imperfect
brain this man is able to detect faulty data and faulty brain
activity. In my opinion the only guilt of living
creatures is, so that they are born with more or less perfect brain, of
which activities without command of the brain, he or she
cannot control, only the opportunity to remedy imperfect brain it is
possible with increasing experience (education by other individuals or
nature) or other outside interference.
This reflects
also the fact, that less perfect evolutionary ancestors of man
with less perfect brain, in the current world they would be
automatically regarded as criminals. Just imagine in current interpersonal
relationships such a Neanderthal man to resolve on the basis of
violence, as it was in his or her time and if he or she stays in the
midst of a supermarket and to try to explain to him or her, that he or
she cannot obtain food by force, or gathering, as he or she was used
and to pay money for them. In
order that the brain of human ancestors was perfected to its
present level, the experience of many generations was necessary,
both in individual lives and experiences switching from generation to
generation in the form of hereditary genetic information. The
current crime of man is the by generational experience
mitigated initial developmental imperfection of the brain of
human ancestors and it could be expected that with the experience, that
he or she acquires or individuals of his or her kind in their current
life or in the lives of their descendants, this developmental
imperfection of the brain of living creatures will decrease.
What order to
act we will get from the brain, it depends on its internal organization
and external circumstances, it is concerned which fact will be strong, urgent
enough, it will do to someone so strong pressure, the brain
issues a command to the body of man to some action. In my opinion
strength of a fact is predetermined then only partially. In other
words the future development of certain facts we can predict only
probably, or it is a coincidence in the mathematical sense. In my
opinion there is basis of human
freedom, which the majority of religious
and philosophical views suppose. The point is, that the
future development of nature and
also commands of the individual's brain, which is also its part, they are only probable and therefore largely accidental.
(Position of the micro particles and its momentum cannot be determined
by microscopic physics with absolute precision using de Broglie waves
and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle
we can only determine the probability, with which the micro
particle will be located in a space-time point). One cannot influence
the commands, that his or her brain gives, if so he or she tries, it is
also concerned the command of his or her brain.
Well-known
philosopher Baruch Spinoza said that the freedom is a recognized
necessity. The point is that orders to human behavior, which are so
strong, that one must act according to them, given by his or her brain,
i.e. by the model of reality, virtually nature, and which is
independent of man, they reduce as much as possible the strength of
collisions of this man with his or her surroundings. In other words,
that the model of nature, virtually of
reality contained in the individual brain was closely consistent with
the whole purpose of evolution of nature. This is not
possible for the newborn brain, which contains only the inherited form
of experience in the genes of their parents, while it is also not
possible for developmentally imperfect individuals of a species, of
whose developmental (genetic) experience contained in their brains is
not so perfect so they harmonize all nature or reality. But it
is also possible to say, that with increasing time of development this
experience contained in the brain of all living creatures expands,
virtually improves and, in my opinion in
infinite time it can be expected that these individuals together
reconcile in their brains, i.e. in a model of reality perfectly
all reality, virtually nature.
This concept of freedom of the individual
justifies also the nature to give a living creature more or less
perfect brain and thus only nature is guilty for a bad
(e.g. criminal) or good behavior of this individual. If it is
possible, only depending on the length of education,
virtually experience of
some
type of individuals to influence and to self-repair the activities
of their brains, it is possible with the length of education, virtually
experience of each individual of particular type with imperfect brain
to achieve reducing her or his guilt, in the ideal
case their complete innocence. Therefore, if for the
individuals of species we provide long enough experience (i.e.
evolution), we can reach a state of complete perfection of these
individuals, bad or good, holy man or a murderer, an animal or human. In my opinion in other words with different length
of experience it is possible to correct the imperfections of each brain.
From the above perspective, it should be
criminal law, virtually by it imposed sanctions understood primarily as
means of preventing, of which primary task
is to train individuals not to commit crime and to protect society from
criminal acts, thus preventing their commission. The preventive
function should prevail as both in relation to the society (general
prevention) and against the perpetrators (individual
prevention). I understand that prevention is aimed
primarily as a permanent reduction in the probability of collisions,
conflicts at the society of all, both through educational activities
and through repression, i.e., more collisions, virtually conflicts to
protect society from criminals, which must also act with educational
goal of rehabilitation of criminals. It must
always be concerned combination of educational and defensive function
against the perpetrators of crime by society and the State.
From the above
perspective the retribution against the
offender cannot be the purpose of punishment if they are
not means of educational activities and a means of defense against the
commission of crimes. To offenders who are governed by imperfect
command of his or her brain, in my view we cannot attribute for his or
her crime the blame other than, that one has an imperfect brain.
Therefore such offenders should be
rehabilitated in particular allowing him or her to gain
experience on the basis, on which the next time he or she will not
commit the same or similar offense. Corporal
punishment except the death penalty should be applied only in the case
of legitimate self-defense or extreme emergency in the society, when
the need to protect society from criminals, which cannot otherwise be
achieved, outweighs the possibility of re-education.
In the case of
educational punishment, which will aim at the good of perpetrators, it
will not be aimed just at the retribution, it will re-educate
them to become a better person, the damaged need not fear, that others
will retaliate against him or her for his or her fault on the other
hand, since then they will try to re-educate him or her to the better,
they will not seek to destroy him or her. It
is possible, that the concept of the criminal justice
system is enforced at any cost, not just a criminal justice,
which is not against me.
The Devil (i.e., absolute vacuum), which many
religions and philosophies consider as the producer of any socially
dangerous or criminal activity of all evil in society, can be seen in
this article in two fold. Either as a servant of evolution
(education) of nature, whose mission is to educate people and other
living organisms, virtually their offspring by increasing their
experience to perfection (see concept of
Satan as the son of God, who is fulfilling God's commands in
the Biblical book of Job 1:6, "Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them."). Or as the enemy of evolution (education) of
nature, who is based on enlarging his experience educated by the nature
to perfection (see the biblical concept of
Satan as an enemy of God, but who
is subjected entirely to the will of God in the biblical New
Testament).
Literature:
Philosophy of
Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
Poměr uváení
a vázanosti státních
orgánů právními
normami, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007,
http://www.e-polis.cz/
Svoboda, http://trepetalka.blog.cz/
II. / D) Philosophy
of the rights of living organisms
Prerequisites
to achieve this ideal State, virtually natural law is, in my opinion
next: Free and genuine agreement of all of the persons, only
then it is sustainable and not threatened by illegal
activities such as theft, murder, etc. The
bodies of this agreement shall be all living organisms, because
it would not be a sustainable power because of resistance of these
complaining organisms. Omnipotence
of all living organisms acting in mutual agreement, because
the only way, that power is the maximum and sustainable power not
threatened with this agreement complaining organisms and material
phenomena. Omnipotence implies a complete
knowledge and mastery of nature.
From the above perspective all living
organisms, that current law consider the thing in the legal sense,
should be seen the future subjects of law with full legal
capacity, with which
in the future people ideally
will conclude a social contract as a free and real private
agreement. In this sense, we should see human evolution and living
organisms, where on the one hand man is able
to create a numerous legal entities not under compulsion but primarily
on the basis of agreement,
we can say, that a man increasingly civilizes, on the other hand, evolution of animals is reflected in move closer
their capabilities such as tool use, communication, etc., where the
live organisms have benefit from the presence of humans, when
their evolutionary convergence to human is happening much
faster than the evolutionary development of man themselves.
Natural law as an exclusive free and genuine
agreement of everyone and compliance of each and all, and apparently
without any collisions, virtually conflicts as
the ideal so it response to the question, where to find God. That's the
question facing all religions of the world and they assume the
existence of invisible loving God. This compliance of each and
everything (considered as natural law) wants to materialize,
however, the invisible loving
God through a loving visible God, who is formed exclusively by
the community of all as free and genuine agreement, as a private
institute, in which there will be no place for any
coercion of individuals, all shall be governed exclusively by the free
and genuine agreement of all the individuals who will be in full
compliance with inanimate nature, that any collision, virtually
conflict does not occur between them.
In
other words how the world would be beautiful, if there is no pain, illness, death, hunger and thirst of all
living creatures, therefore all individuals should strive to
achieve this goal already in the material world, not only after death
in an uncertain invisible world. Therefore it is necessary to begin not
to kill unnecessarily living organisms as food, when we already want to
live in peace and friendship with them and to form the community of all
living individuals based solely on the most free and true (for animals
supposed) agreement. In my opinion now people
or another living creature cannot be fully happy and fully so
individuals to relieve of suffering in our world, if other people, as
well as other living creatures suffer by it, or they are unnecessarily
killed. A man, who kills needlessly living creatures, is so
accustomed in particular to death. Man who is able to desire for
consistency between each and all not only to understand but also to
control their actions, that in the moment we approached the
ideal as much as possible, thus he or she bears responsibility
not only for him or herself and their species, but also for the
establishment and development of other living creatures to this harmony
of each and all.
Therefore the
following social maxima is to use, which I further elaborated in
my post the Philosophy of economic law published in the Journal of
Political Science on the Internet www.e-polis.cz , both on the relationship of man to another man, and
on their relationship to other living creatures, and these social
maxima are fully applicable only in the ideal society, where
living creatures will have full legal personality and with it related
evolutionarily acquired legal capacity, of which the condition is
recognition ability (psychological factor) and control ability (element
of will).
Social maxima:
1) The society should ensure that the assets of
all individuals meet their needs.
Both among
people and also other living creatures can be distinguished more
vigorous, energetic and less vigorous individuals, and energetic
individuals have greater needs and therefore demands on the property,
which is for the other living creatures in particular the territory,
from which they exclude other individuals of their kind, which they
guard. However, like human the other live beings of a certain kind are taking this
territory, together with other kinds of living creatures. These other
types of living creatures are often part of the diet of carnivorous,
omnivorous and herbivorous individuals in this territory. In my opinion
eating living creatures among themselves is the result of disorganized
(chaotic) evolution of the Universe from utter chaos to the
ever ordered forms. Since this development is carried out randomly by
trial and error, and the emergence of nature as a
system includes a compliance of individuals and their differences.
While more consistency of individuals is seen in living
creatures within the same species, where eating each other it is not
common rather than with the living creatures of different species,
where the food chain is relatively safe only for living creatures at
the top of the food chain, which is human.
In my view the
development, is directed evolutionarily from the chaos to the above
structured ideal system of law and justice, it should meet the needs of
not only humans but also of other living beings under the principle: Do
another, even animal, insect, plant, fungus, live cell bacterium,
virus, etc., what you want him or her to do to you. It should enable
these creatures to live the next evolutionary development, that they
could approach to man. One must use nature, accelerating the evolution
of living creatures so as to protect the lives of living creatures from
extinction or loss of species. The focus here is to protect
biodiversity.
If there is a
kind of living creature at life threat it is from the above social
maximum
the obligation of man to act as a parallel with the
above ransom obligation mentioned in the contribution of the Philosophy
of economic law published in the Journal of Political
Science on the Internet www.e-polis.cz . There would
be primarily the compensation of this species of living creatures, that
he or she was not allowed to complete their evolutionary development
and to turn their talents to the actual capacity.
2) The society should guarantee the
inviolability of property of individuals both from the State and from
other private individuals.
In my opinion
other living creatures have as the man the certain values, which the
State should protect both from itself and from others, it is here
primarily to protect against intentional destruction of those values,
but also from various forms of theft of those values, such as
unnecessary killing of living creatures and the destruction of their
environment. These values of living creatures are mainly life, natural living
conditions of living creatures, their territory and the natural
environment and the dignity of the species of living creatures. These
values of every living creature the State should protect
against other people, as the present subjects with full legal
capacity making them liable for infringements, where these people are
qualified to perform legal acts, i.e., they are able to recognize the
hazards of their actions for society and to control their conduct. In
the future other living creatures
obtain
the legal capacity as well as against other living creatures. To
violate the values of living creatures, especially to kill a living
creature, it should be possible only in extreme emergency or necessary
defense. Such cases include the necessary experiments on animals
because of the development of new medicines and treatments carried out
as humanely as possible and the attack against humans by
living creature, it is not possible to avert the attack differently and
if the method used to be a reasonable defense due to danger. In the
case of extreme emergency,
the
living creatures may be killed
because of the food, if it is not possible for humans or
domesticated animals to replace animal proteins from carrions, eggs or
milk, or experiments of cosmetic companies should not be done in these
living creatures as.
3) The society should force everyone to
maximize their personal profit, while socially beneficial work.
People should
see in other live creatures the next subjects of rights and obligations
with full legal capacity, which they will acquire probably with the
evolutionary development
faster due to the proximity to humans. Therefore, it should be
expanded and continue the process of domestication of living creatures
and their involvement in human society.
4) The society should ensure, that no
individual will be seriously jeopardized on the life and health because
of the lack.
In the case of
animals it is concerned to protect the entire species of living
creatures from starvation, thirst, and mass mortality due to epidemics
of living creatures or natural disasters. From this perspective, it
should also be seen hunting rights to animals, where in the wild
animals should not be kept for meat, or shot for fun by
so-called hunters, but free progress
of
their development should be performed, to which hunters should interfere with killing animals
only in the above-mentioned case of extreme emergency or legitimate
self-defense that is, where the animal threatens a man.
Hunters should take the same way as today care of the animals in case
of threat to species or more animals in the area.
From the
perspective of the current law we should provide that living
creature is not a thing in the legal sense, they should be a subject of
the law lacking of legal capacity, gifted
aforementioned fundamental rights of living creatures, because
every living creature is alive, like a man capable of feeling pain and
gifted psyche. This should be expressed by
statutory provisions, or directly Constitution of ČR as
the basic document expressing the above fundamental rights of living
creatures.
Literature:
Philosophy of
Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
Vztah
mezinárodního práva
veřejného a soukromého a
vnitrostátního práva
z pohledu upravovaných společenských
vztahů, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.e-polis.cz
,
2006
Poměr
uváení a vázanosti
státních orgánů
právními normami, JUDr.
Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
Budoucnost
práva, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
Smlouva a
donucení, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
Filosofie
ekonomického prava, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.,
2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
Spravedlivá
válka (bellum iustum), JUDr. Dalibor Grůza
Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz
II. / E) The use of
foreign law in private international law
In my view the
international community is including, the international social
relations of States and individuals, while for adjustment of international social
relations between countries in the course of history public
international law set up for the area of international social relations
between individuals, whether in
the form of relations of private individuals or private legal persons, a private international law set up. These
international relationships are different from purely domestic law that
governs domestic relations of the State and its nationals
without an international element. How international
social relations of public international law and international social
relations of private international law are characterized by
cross-border element in the sense as defined in
international private law, namely international element in the foreign
entity of a legal relationship, which may be either a foreign State or
a member, either a foreign legal entity or natural person, in
foreign indirect subject of legal relations, thus the thing,
right, intangible results of human activities, to which the behavior of
participants of the legal relationship is related, they are
located abroad or otherwise located, or linked to the foreign country
or to be made abroad, then it may be in foreign factors relevant to the
formation and existence of a legal relationship that has arisen or
occured abroad, it may be a legal act or other event or conduct of the
parties that is legally relevant content of that relationship, or it
may be based on a legal relationship that is legally related or
dependent (secondary) in a legal relationship, if this relationship
(primary, main) is managed by foreign or international law.
Conceptual
uncertainties concerning international private and public law when the
legal norms of private international law will include also issues of
international social relations of public law (e.g. international law,
tax, criminal, foreigners' law, etc.) and international public law
regulates also the relations between States which are more private in
nature (e.g. international law of the contracting), I propose to
exclude through the introduction of the division in international
law of States (International law of States, Staatsvölkerrecht,
droit international des États), that marks
the
public international law with regard to
the fact, that at least one side of the legal relationship is always a
foreign State as a sovereign, therefore,that it is mainly concerned interstate
international
law, and individual international
law or in Czech international
law of individuals (International law of individuals, internationales Einzelrecht,
droit international des individus), that marks
the private international law with regard to the fact, that the
participants of legal relation are individuals and these relations have
the above international element, as an individual, there
a foreign State may appear, which does not act, however, here as the
sovereign.
In the case of
international private and public law it is concerned the
social and legal
international relationships, because
between the affected and resolving subjects they are also members of
the foreign country, either as individuals or their associations in the
form of the legal persons or a foreign country who have their own law
and own image on the right, virtually content of regulations
of the legal issues. At the current applicable international
private virtually
individual law, and the state of society, virtually States, however,
there is a competition between the territorial jurisdiction of a
sovereign State over all persons and things located in the States and
international nature of social relations governed by private, virtually individual international law, because of lack of
regulation of international public
virtually
State law the States
are forced to regulate the international social relations of
individuals in an alternative way, namely on the basis of national law,
even in this adjustment they cannot completely ignore the international
nature of the social relationships of individuals and their regulation,
where States are forced by the international nature of these
relationships to abandon the election of their law in favor of foreign law, which is
concerning the closest relationship to the case (conflict
rules), and it leads to the conclusion of numerous international
treaties in the field of public virtually State international law.
In my view, I
am consent to monistic learning, which
considers the notion of law as indivisible, it assumes the
consistency of all the rules of law, secured by fixed rules of law
preventing conflict between legal norms. The lower-ranking rule, which is contrary to the legal superior
rule of law, is invalid. Among the rules of the same legal force the
principle lex posterior derogat priori, a later
rule cancels the earlier rule shall apply. In my opinion,
there is no strict border only subjective border
between social relations involving all members of a State,
virtually of the nation sorted to the public international law and
social relations, involving small groups of people without an
international element, virtually with an international element
sorted to a purely national law, virtually private international law.
There is only one indivisible whole of social relations in fact, which
the legal theory divides artificially.
Law I understand as a public contract, I have in mind
in particular the social contract, as it is particularly prevalent in
the political thinkers Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), John Locke
(1632-1704) and Jacques Rousseau (1712-1788), who discussed the
establishment of State. In fact it embodies the social contract as the
constitutional law of each State, however other social relationships of
private and public nature are also subject to the social contract.
Public, virtually social contract is a law of each State as well as
international law, both international treaties and, in my opinion,
other sources of international law, especially the usage. Even public
contract should satisfy regulatory elements
of act in accordance with § 34 et seq. Civil Code, but in
somewhat modified form.
The concept of law as a contract also reflects
the contemporary Czech law, that
prescribes similar the requirements of architectural elements
of the legal act. E.g. in the Czech Republic, it is the consent of the
social contract subjects on behalf of the legislative organs
(cf. ARTICLE 2, paragraph 1 of the
Constitution ČR). Requirements relating to the will, namely
the fact (given), freedom and dignity and the equivalence of the expression and will are provided in the legislative
process in Article 37 et seq. the
Constitution of the ČR and Rules of Procedure of the Chamber
of Deputies and the Senate ČR. In my view legislative process is
analogous to complex contracting process including in particular the
draft of law and its approval. The most important requirement of
freedom of the will against violence and threats are protected
in Article 26 of the Constitution ČR
and also in § 92 of the
Criminal Code, the criminal act of subversion
against the Republic. The requirement relating to the object of law as
a social contract specifically its possibility and compliance with
morality it expresses particular Article 2,
paragraph 3 of the Constitution ČR, which provides, that the
State power shall serve all citizens. The requirement of the elements of expression of the will
reflects Article 52 of
the Constitution ČR, which
provides that the validity of the law is requiring its publication.
Unlike conventional legal acts, however, the principle of majority, the
assumption of superiority and accuracy of the act apply.
International
law, thus both private and public international law are by nature a
total of international social relations in the above sense, which
require the international rules, in particular international treaty in
the field of public international law. Public international law is,
however, currently still under development and as such it is an
imperfect law, virtually public contract in the birth stage, where
there is still no mechanism under contract (pacta sunt servanda
principle, i.e., of binding contracts) that applies also to
the establishment of a permanent majority, or sovereign in a national
sense, as it might be for the European Union. Therefore, all the questions
of the use of foreign law should be dealt in
private international law under existing treaties in the field
of public international law of the affected States or pursuant to that
expected (hypothetical) international agreement of the affected States,
which have to a given legal relationship with the international element
a close relationship.
This approach
is taken in particular by the concepts dealing with conflict rules for
the use of rules, which cannot be changed and replaced on principle
within the object of its regulation by foreign law. If in this case
their use has the importance for the private relationship with a
foreign element, one must use them within the object of their
application regardless of the law on basis of the conflict
rules governing the private relationship with an international element
although governed by foreign law. It means, that these rules limit the
scope for the application of conflict rules and choice of law
carried out by them, because they prevent the selection of the law of
the conflict. One recommends for them different names, such as
absolutely mandatory rules, strictly coercive rules, mandatory norms,
necessarily applicable or directly applicable rules, irreplaceable
(unchangeable) rules and labeling the laws of public order. It is
mostly a public rules (to be distinguished from the public order
reservation, then I will use the name mandatory
rules).
To the
aforementioned concepts it belongs the
concept of so-called special (Sonderanknüpfung), which
is represented by W. Wengler and L. Kohn,
which tries to find a specific generally applicable bilateral conflict
rule, which would allow not only to apply public rules that are part of
the legis causae (the law according to the conflict rules) and legis
fori (the law of court that decides the matter), but also other legal
orders defined by the collision rule. The content of these specific
conflict rules is not clear, as the criterion for the use of public
rules it is mostly the sufficiently close relationship between this law
and the legal relationship. With its consequences this theory
is similar to other theories in the doctrine of private international
law. As an example so called lois d'application immediate
represented by Ph. Francescakisem, who
comes with the idea, that instead the public and foreign rules would be
applied simply directly of the complex and laborious thinking through
the conflict rules. Another example of this kind is unilateralist
theory represented P. Gothot. Gothot
considers, that the nature of a public method the unilateral method
reflects better and therefore he proposes to create a system with only
one-sided conflict rules (i.e. rules that define the international
competence
of only national law). The principle of application of public rules
should be based on the fact, that these rules "want to be applied". The
latest example of special application of foreign public rules is the
work of A. Toubiána.
Toubiána is outlining in his work, unlike previous theories
the principle of direct applicability of foreign public standards
determined solely, that the obligation enters the sphere of
application of these rules and these rules are consistent with the
principle of public order (order public). He focuses primarily on the
possibility of bilateralisation of unilateral conflict rules (bilateral conflict rule refers
both to their own or foreign law) of legis fori leading to use
their own public rules.
Mandatory rules
of any law are determining the factual issues, where the concerned
State
is unwilling to abandon its own legislation and to replace it with the
use of foreign law on the basis of conflict rules. The principle of
public order constitutes in turn the legal norms of each country, from
which absolutely unacceptable legislation of foreign State follows,
that legislation of the concerned State considers obviously
substantially harmful to society. These
mandatory rules and legal norms of public order are set of legal rules,
which individual States consider the unconditional
requirement of fair rules, which they would also probably
absolutely require for regulation by an international treaty in the
field of public international law. In the absence
for the social relationship with the international element of an
international treaty the legislation in the conflict of laws is
necessary to base on the expected (hypothetical) international
legislation. Expected international treaty of the States would include
certainly the mandatory rules and principles arising from the
principles of public order into the future international agreement.
Therefore in my opinion all the mandatory
rules of law should be used, within which
competence the social relationship with an international element is, of
which law the rule of law is, which has to that social relationship a
close relationship and if a specific mandatory rule is not contrary to
the principle of public order of any of the States. The concerned
State, which law
has a given social relationship with an international element a close
relationship, it is concerned, if a given State
has territorial or personal jurisdiction over persons and
things within a given social relationship with an international
element. Territorial and personal jurisdiction of the State follows
then from the international public law. In the case of conflict
of mandatory rules of several concerned States or
their contradiction with the principle of public order of some
concerned State is according to the principle of expected
(hypothetical) international agreements of the concerned States the use of mandatory rules, which has the closest
relationship to that social relationship and not contrary to public
order in most of the States. If the mandatory rule is in contrary to
public order of only a minority of the States, then about its use the
law of the Court should decide, which decides the matter (legis fori).
Apart from the
above so given internally harmonic system of mandatory rules and legal
norms of public order, from which the States are not willing to step
aside, there are other legal norms, in
particular legal norms of private law, which the individual States in
the case of social relationship with an international element are
willing to replace on the basis of the conflict rules using
foreign law. States carry out in fact a similar
choice of law to the election of the law of private persons, whose
States allow in particular
case
of private obligations with international element. Individual States
are defining in their conflict rules the rules that have to the
concerned social relationship with international element the closest or
close relationship and this law may be used for regulation of
social relationship with an international element.
Provisions of
the conflict rules of private international law determine
law of the closest relationship to a given social relationship with an
international element, it is usually built under the so-called
statutory theory. They are passwords, to which the later
doctrine of private international law, summarized the rules drawn up in
postglosator school:
1. Statuta Personalia, normally law of the
State, of which nationality the
concerned person (lex origins)
has, exceptionally law of the State, in which the interested
person is domiciled (lex domicilii),
this law is usually governed personal legal capability, family
relationships and inheritance (statutes
personalia sequuntur personam domini"), as well as conditions
relating to movable assets (mobilio sequuntur
personam domini)
2. Statuta realia, i.e. the law of the
State, where the thing is (lex rei sitae),
this law is governed relations of the immovable property (Immobilie sunt obnoxia territorio)
3. Statuta mixta, i.e. the law of the State,
where a crucial event was (lex loci
actus). This law governs the elements of negotiations and
obligations (locus regit actum)
In my opinion material (not conflict) law with the most narrow
link on a given social relationship with an international element
according to an hypothetical (estimated) international treaty it is the law with
prevailing territorial and personal competence in terms of legal norms
of public international law on persons and things within a given social
relationship with an international element. The choice of
such a material law is very vague, because at the time of the court's
decision the social
relations regulated by law
would
not have to extinguish, it may also be questions, even though
the legal relationship has expired, they themselves have not ceased to
exist as liability for damages, penalties, etc. Therefore, the
practical application of conflict norms of different States is
greatly different. In my view this vaguely defined conflict rule
specifies also, that the closest relationship to a given social
relationship with an international element the material
(not conflict) law has on the territory, on which the social relation
mainly takes place. This general rule does not apply without
exception. Places, where a social relationship with an international
element takes place (i.e. the place of direct object of the legal
relationship) it is a regular mirror of the territorial jurisdiction of
the State over things covered by the social relationship (indirect
object of legal relations) and over the subjects of legal relations and
personal jurisdiction over State subjects of legal relations. In other
words it is to apply the rebuttable legal
presumption, that the majority of people and things within
the social relationship is found on national territory (i.e. the vast
territorial jurisdiction) and that the majority of persons are
belonging to the State (i.e. the vast personal power), where the social
relationship with an international element mostly takes place.
The legal
system of each concerned country contains so conflict rules defining
the material (not conflict) law of the closest relationship to a given
social relationship with an international element, given by the
uncertainty of the above general conflict rule it is often concerned in
the case of the various concerned
countries
the material (rather than conflict) laws of different States. The
State, of which law has to a given social relationship with an
international element a close relationship, it is concerned, if a given
State has territorial or personal jurisdiction over persons and things
within a given social relationship with an international element. The
above-mentioned principle, of a hypothetical proposed international
agreement is responsible, that every State in
the framework of its conflict rules referred to such a material (not
conflict) law of domestic or foreign State, which was selected on the
basis of their conflict of law rules as applicable material law by the
vast majority of the other States. Therefore the decisive
State courts should examine, which the material (not conflict) law is
applicable to the social relationship, not only according to domestic
conflict rules, but also by the rules of the other States. If the vast
majority of the other States
voted for the use of a material (not conflict) law of
one of the country, which has the closest relationship to a given
social relationship with an international element according to this
vast majority of the countries, or for the use of a material (not
conflict) rules, which have the close
relationship to a given social relationship with an international
element according to this vast majority of the States, the other States should join to the majority. In the Czech
private international law the same purpose is achieved
by using the provisions of § 35 of Act no. No. 97/1963 Coll.
about private international law of other and re-link, which
provides, that if, under the provisions of this Act is to apply the
rule of law which the provisions (understand conflict rules of private
international law) refer back to the Czech law or the law of another State, such reference
can be accepted if it corresponds to rational and equitable arrangement
of relationship, which is concerned. In my
view other and re-link should be by a Czech judge accepted only, if it
refers to State law, which the conflict rules of most of the States
identify as applicable to the social relationship with international
element. This will prepare the legal ground in the
international community to conclude a future international agreement in
the field of public international law and the eventual unification of
all States of the international community.
Similarly one can proceed, if under the law the international treaty is to be used in
the field of public international law, to which use the most of the
States agree, even though it is not bound for the State of court, State
of lex fori should use this international treaty. In the event,
that it is concerned the State, where the rule of Anglo-American common law, in particular U.S. States,
where the judge creates the law on the basis of the
foreign law (local law theory of Walter
Wheeler Cook) or which apply mostly law of the court (lex
fori as such Brainard Currie, Ehrenzweig),
or, where a choice is between the results (so-called
result selective approach, of D. Cavers), where the judge
selects a particular material rules in its sole discretion, in such
cases it can be probably understood as referring to the lex fori, i.e.
the law of the court and to use it in the event, that most of the
concerned States agree to the use of this law.
Ideally, an international social relations will
be resolved only on the basis of a contract of all the legal entities,
whether they are States or individuals. In the ideal
case as well the international community of States will solve all
social relations through international treaty or international custom,
which I see as an international treaty of its kind. The international
community of States can develop thus in ideal case through
the way of formation of an international
sovereign State, initially on the basis of the above public
contracts, which apply the principles of majority and superiority or it can directly reach a situation,
where a continuous real and free consent of
all States of the international community is given
in all matters of public international law, which
obtains some form of private contract of States, without the prior
establishment of an international sovereign State. To reach this ideal purely contractual
international community of States without wars and conflicts, as to me
the proposed legislation is directed to apply a foreign law in private
international law.
Literature:
- Zdeněk
Kučera, Mezinárodní právo
soukromé, Doplněk, 1994.
-
Malenovský J., Mezinárodní
právo veřejné, Doplněk, Brno 1993.
- Rouček,
Fr.-Sedláček, J., Komentář
k československému Obecnému
zákoníku občanskému (1.
díl), Praha, V Linhart, 1935.
-
Pauknerová, M., Přímá aplikace
administrativně-právních norem
v mezinárodním právu
soukromém, SMP 1984, vol. 18, p. 145 n.
- Philosophy of
Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
- Poměr
uváení a vázanosti
státních orgánů
právními normami, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.,
2007, www.e-polis.cz
-
Vztah mezinárodního práva
veřejného a soukromého a
vnitrostátního práva z pohledu
upravovaných společenských vztahů,
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., www.e-polis.cz ,
2006
-
Soukromá a veřejná Smlouva a donucení,
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, www.e-polis.cz
-
Budoucnost práva, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, www.e-polis.cz
-
Smlouva a donucení, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, www.e-polis.cz
II.
/ F) Fair War (bellum iustum)
In
international practice of 19th and 20 century, the war could be
considered as an extreme but legal means of coercion, which the State
could respond under the self-help to the infringement of another State.
At that time the number of cases was, when the State conducted
enforcement actions in the foreign country referring to the right of
last resort, or right to exist. Right to existence, self-preservation
(French droit de conservation) means in this case the law of the
resistance by armed force to threats to its existence as a sovereign
State. At this time this law was applied in international practice and
justified by the doctrine also in the form of so-called law of
emergency (French droit de necessité). In an emergency, i.e.
when the vital interests of the State were threatened and legal means
were not enough to avert the threat, in this concept of State
there was the right to eliminate such threats through the
actions that violate rights of other States.
Today,
international law expressly right to the use of armed forces by the
State or States comprising the international community is reserved to
the right of self-defense, or collective self-defense measures and the
use of armed force of UN Security Council. The foundation for this
concept
laid Kellogg Briand Pact of 1928, which
outlawed war as a means of national policy. It was followed after the
Second World War by Article 51 of the UN Charter, which reaffirms the
right of self-defense and declared it as the natural law of the State
(Inherent right). However it restricts the power only in cases of armed
attacks and it requires States to stop the defensive measures, when the
UN Security Council takes action itself to the maintenance of
international peace and security, even though under the Charter the
States themselves will decide whether a specific case, in which are
given conditions of self-defense, however, they are required
immediately to inform the UN Security Council, that they have taken
defensive measures. In the system of collective security of the UN a
legitimate self-defense is only against armed and
acute
attack in an adequate and defensive manner.
Attacked State must stop the self-defense, if an armed attack is
stopped. Also it granted the right to a collective self-defense.
Conditions for its exercise the International Court of
Justice in The Hague established by the UN Charter defined in the
precedent on military and paramilitary activities in and against
Nicaragua in 1986, it is the fact, that a direct victim of aggression
must declare publicly, that it was attacked and to ask other States for
military aid. Third States have the right to collective self-defense,
in the allied and other contracts they may assume, however, the
obligation to collective self-defense (e.g., instrument NATO 1949).
Armed self-defense measures are an exception to the prohibition of the
use of force and threat of force, which launched expresses verbis the
Declaration of friendly relations and cooperation between States, which the
UN General Assembly built
and unanimously declared in 1970. Another exception to this prohibition
is the actions using the
armed forces of the UN Security Council, to which the UN Security
Council can resort only when other less coercive practices were
fleeting, i.e. in cases the most serious breach of international peace
and security. Armed action on call of
the UN Security Council completes those right of self-defense
and it represents military action in the case also other threats to
international peace and security than the closely-ranging law of
self-defense, in contrast, from which it may have an offensive nature
and it need not to be terminate, when the State sanctioned refrain
from its offensive conduct.
The
concept of law as a social contract reflects also the international
public,
virtually State law,
which is currently opposed to national law more likened to the classic
private contract, which provides a free and genuine agreement of equal
entities. So, where it is not possible to reach such an agreement of
States as enjoying full rights subjects of public, virtually State international
law, there it is to talk about the imperfections, virtually gaps in
this field of law. Lack of agreement gradually fills the principle of
majority and superiority, which in international public, virtually State law
promotes particular form of authority, the UN Security Council with 15
members, which may take decisions in the field of peace and security,
that shall be binding on other countries of the international
community. At the same time the principle of majority and superiority
is manifested in the position of 5 permanent members of UN Security
Council that have a veto over such decisions. Another means of gradual
enforcing the principle of majority and the primacy known from
national law it is international custom as a source of international
public, virtually State law,
where the decision by the International Court of Justice in The Hague
in the cases of the North Sea continental shelf in 1969 provides for
the development of international custom the qualified practice (usus
longaevus) and beliefs of subjects on the legally
binding rules of conduct contained in this practice (opinio
iuris). But the international judicial practice often ignores
the latter subjective element (opinio iuris), which some officials
suggest to presume, which in my opinion, indicates also a gradual
promoting of the principle of majority and superiority in international
public, virtually State law.
In
the form of the above mentioned international treaties and
international custom it was provided the above law of the use
of States armed forces in international public, virtually State law
as a social (public) contract. This legislation has failed, however, to
fill the following gaps in the legislation of the use of armed forces
of the international community, which would require greater enforcement
of the principle of majority and superiority in international public,
virtually State law.
The
aforementioned gaps in the rules of
international public, virtually State law of use of armed forces by the international
community they include: 1) violations of the right to life within the
State committing the crime of genocide and the failure to take adequate
measures by the Security Council, 2) attacking the State that is unable
to effective self-defense in case of failure of collective security and
not taking appropriate measures by the UN Security Council and 3)
preemptive self-defense, when an armed attack against a State by
another State is not acute but otherwise unavoidable.
In these cases, so individuals and States of the international
community must adopt extra-legal means, and possibly even the
use of armed force.
In
the case of the above using non-legal means of compulsion by an
individual State or group of States for the failure of international
public, virtually State law
(i.e. public, virtually the social contract) in terms of these subjects
clearly harmful to society, in my view, one must be ready to apply the
principles of national law known as the principle of subsidiarity and
proportionality in the case of extreme emergency and legitimate
self-defense. In an extreme emergency and necessary defense the
violence can avert this danger, if it is direct, not otherwise
avertable and a consequence of this practice is not obviously more
harmful than the effect that threatened from this danger. In the case
of above using non-legal means in the failure of the applicable law
these principles apply also with the difference, that the risk is not
imminent, it can also be a remote risk that cannot be averted
otherwise. This follows from the fact, that in averting the danger
involved in extreme distress or need defense in the domestic law it is
always possible in case of remote danger to ask for assistance of
components of State power, they have the duty and power to intervene
effectively. In the event of failure of law, however, this obligation
and the power to intervene effectively are not given, either because of
imperfection in the case of law as international law, which still does
not constitute an international sovereign State or possibly Federation
or Confederation, or in the case of an unjust law, which is clearly
harmful to society. Principle of not damaging outcome is controversial
and it is obvious mostly after completion of using of non-legal means,
it is necessary to mention other well-known national law principle,
which will help us to assess compliance with the principles of not
damaging results of using non-legal means before and during use of
non-legal means. This next rule is the principle that the use of
non-legal means may not be obviously unreasonable to the risk of danger
of clearly malicious law,
virtually coercion.
From
the above then the conditions follow that should be followed for the use of
non-legal means of armed forces of State, virtually States in
the above cases of gaps in legislation of public, virtually State international
law. It must be an otherwise unavoidable
threat to the lives of a larger group of people than
it threatens through the extra-legal using armed
forces to defend them (further also as “protection, virtually
improving of international peace and security”). In
other words the fact, that the way of use of means of
necessary defense by
these States it meets
resulting hazards and risks, which could not be averted otherwise. The
same is true for the above-mentioned case of preventative war, the war
must also be otherwise unavoidable.
Review
of the above conditions of the use of non-legal means of armed forces
is very difficult because the future is always
uncertain. Therefore in terms of an intervenining single State it
should always be an obvious protection, virtually improving
international peace and security (i.e. to reduce otherwise unavoidable
loss of human life). Requirement of visibility may diminish with the
number of States involved in the armed conflict of States. In other
words, if the intervening States take justice into their own hands and
they enter the role of substitute executors of justice instead of the
UN Security Council, the greater is the legitimacy of alternative
countermeasure, the more global, i.e. the greater number of countries
is in it jointly involved. Although the protection, virtually improving
international peace and security (i.e., reduction of otherwise
unavoidable loss of human life) is not for all global allies obvious,
the protection, virtually improving international peace and security
(i.e., reduction of otherwise unavoidable loss of human life) must
always be, however, the purpose of countermeasures of the
intervening States. The legitimacy strengthens it
when the United Nations before the application of qualified
countermeasures find illegal actions of the State, against which
countermeasures are directed.
Classic
case of using non-legal means of armed force by the State it was the
war in Iraq brought by the U.S. and its allies. The war was not covered
by the call to start war operations by the UN Security Council, that
never acted on the attack against Iraq and the U.S. did not act in
self-defense, even on the basis of collective security. The war could
justify then only the fact, if the number of human victims of this
operation was less than the number of human victims, which would occur,
if the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein remained in power. Today, we can
say, that the number of human victims of war and occupation exceeds the
Saddam regime, and therefore the U.S. operations strays from the use of
non-legal means of armed force within the legitimate self-defense,
virtually extreme emergence in international public, virtually State law,
as I defined above. Regarding the knowledge of the harmful effect of
the U.S. and its allies at the start of the invasion the situation has
been controversial. In my opinion, even when starting the invasion, it
was not to talk about obvious protection, virtually improving
international peace and security (i.e., reduction of otherwise
unavoidable loss of human lives), it was not clearly demonstrated that
Saddam Hussein was preparing for war, and thus to produce chemical and
biological weapons, the number of victims of Saddam Hussein's regime at
the time, when the Kurds were protected from air, as well it was
apparently not higher than the number of victims, which could bring the
U.S. invasion in Iraq. The requirement of visibility also was not
reduced significantly by broad international consensus about the
invasion, when Russia, China and France were reserved.
In
the case of the above gaps of regulation of international public,
virtually State law there
is not due to imperfect law the legal obligation of States to apply the
above non-legal means to reduce the otherwise unavoidable loss of human
lives, we can speak only about the moral obligation of States
and individuals. Where the States fulfill a moral obligation to protect
human life, they should be promoted rather than to mark them with not
good concepts of "world policeman" etc. It is a natural process of
creating a permanent majority in the international community through
trial and error, which may assume timely the role of State, as it
happened with European countries through the European Union, which
could fill well the above gap in the rules of international
public, virtually State law
and which could raise the global democratic and social society without
wars between States.
In
conclusion, I would like to point out that Philosophy
of Balance is not pacifist in the sense that absolutely rejects the
war, especially in the case of defensive war, but it is human in the
sense that refuses absolutely to kill people. Soldier in a
war that kills another person is guilty and he or she deserves to be
killed in the war also. Therefore in all circumstances the soldier
would not act in
the war
with intent to kill the enemies, but always with the intent to hurt them only, that for the
required duration of the war they were eliminated from the fight and
they had to be treated. Suffered pain of war is the educational means of natural evolution, through
which the nature preaches us, that it is not consistent with the
purpose of nature to keep any war between people, possibly other living
creatures. At the same time I believe, that
even today one can always target the fight not to kill but only to hurt
the enemy and consequently to eliminate them from
the fight for the requisite period.
Literature:
1) Poměr
uváení a vázanosti
státních orgánů
právními normami, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.,
2007, www.e-polis.cz
2.)
Vztah mezinárodního práva
veřejného a soukromého a
vnitrostátního práva z pohledu
upravovaných společenských vztahů,
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., www.e-polis.cz ,
2006
3)
The Philosophy of Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., www.sweb.cz /
filosofierovnovahy
4) Soukromá
a veřejná Smlouva a donucení, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza
Ph.D., 2007, www.e-polis.cz
5.)
Budoucnost práva, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, www.e-polis.cz
6.)
Smlouva a donucení, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, www.e-polis.cz
7)
Malenovský J., Mezinárodní
právo veřejné, Doplněk, Brno 1993.
8)
Potočný M., Mezinárodní
právo veřejné, Panorama Praha, 1977
III.
PHILOSOPHICAL PART
III. / A) Ideal religion and law
Law and religion are normative orders of society, it is the set of binding rules and expectations of conduct affecting all areas of life.
These normative
orders apparently based on a different purpose, which in the case of
law is to distinguish good and bad behavior
that is beneficial or detrimental to society and it is
therefore mandatory or prohibited by the State which also penalizes
the
breach of these obligations or prohibitions. In the case of the
normative framework of society in terms of religion one
can distinguish good and bad behavior in terms of God or gods,
when God rewards the good conduct of man by his or her favor,
eventually life in heaven or paradise and bad behavior God penalizes by
their sentences, or life in hell.
The
different
purpose is concerned only apparently, because in my view the main
purpose of law and also of religion is the establishment in terms of all ideal
society in the case of
the law in our world and of the religion after the death. The purpose of law and religion in our world would
be to approach through our behavior in terms of all ideal
society in our life not only after death as well as
in terms of religion, it is a crucial human behavior during his or her
life in our world, not only after death.
If we approach
with legal and religious norms in terms of all ideal society
already in our world, we would know, what we
need to become closer. Otherwise, legal and religious norms
would be pure speculation, subjective opinion of any lawyer or
religious preacher.
In the case of
religion the question, what will be in terms of all
ideal society after the death of a man, the various people as the
persons allegedly sent by God answer
to humans
to say, what awaits us after death and how we can ensure, that in terms
of all ideal society, that we have while living in our world trying to
approach. However neither of these founders
and prophets of different religions have never
described exactly this ideal society we
have to achieve latest after the death with great precision, rather they devoted to various commands and prohibitions
how to act here in our world, this in terms of
all ideal society we reach in the worst case after
the death.
Here I mean,
also Judaism, which
abounds with all sorts of commands and prohibitions, but it does not
say what is their ultimate goal, which should be precisely in terms of
all ideal society, or in heaven or in our world to be its goal. So also in this regard
Christianity speaks in
parables of the New Testament of Jesus Christ, nor the Christians do
not know exactly, what is expected for their obedience to the commands
in heaven after death. Regarding Islam
so it describes the reward for obedience to the commands in the Koran
as an environment full of charming houris, where anything will not
lack, but even this description of in terms of all ideal society is not
so accurate, we can derive the relations in this paradise with greater
accuracy. Hinduism says, that after
death the individual
existence of saved man lapses
in
the great soul of the world melt in Brahma. Regarding Buddhism
they talk about extinction, nirvana, which equates to the fact, that
the flame goes out, it's nothing or peace, but neither this ideal is not precisely defined.
What reason for this inaccurate description of this in
terms of all ideal society in all world religions? This is
so, because the founders of these religions themselves did
not know or they do not want to say, what is the aim of
their commands and prohibitions of obedience to God, how exactly looks
the in terms of all ideal society, that we should approach.
This, however, that from the religious teachings we do not know the
exact form of in terms of all ideal
society, that we have to approach in our life in this world, so one cannot
examine these religious orders of it to keep in practice nor logically
or in attempt and one cannot determine if this in
terms of all ideal society in our society we are closer or moving away
from it. Another reason for confusion in the above description from a
religious point of view of ideal society it may be, that generally
described in terms of all ideal society, which has to be
reward for precise fulfillment of religious orders in our world, it is attractive to more people, who
identify with this general description in terms of all ideal
society rather, than it was the case of a precise description
of this ideal in the above world religions.
Exact description of this in terms of all ideal
society does not make also applicable law, which is
characterized today by number of mostly
contradictory orders and prohibitions, by legislator often taken
randomly through the pressure of the certain
currently predominant lobbying group. Exact description of
this in terms of all ideal society does not give also legal theory, for which the very vague notion of natural rights remained
valid to this day that are different for each
and
consequently there is not its exact idea even to this day. Many lawyers
and legal researchers response to it at present through turning to the
idea, that anything like this even does not exist.
Therefore, the
religious and legal scientists have now in our world great
task to agree on how in the terms of all the ideal society, that we
try to approach with law compliance and implementation of any
religious norms, it looks.
As the precise design of in the terms of all the ideal society, the
heaven or paradise in terms of religion and of natural law in terms of
legal theory is concerned, it should be in my opinion to
check directly with individual people, because on the one
hand those give God
or any applicable law the demands in what in terms of all
ideal world they would want to live and on the other hand, if
any God, so surely he puts this form in terms
of all ideal society in the human psyche as a desire for it,
and also this in terms of all ideal society, virtually natural law they should be the result of human nature and
desires of people.
In terms of all
ideal society, the natural law, heaven or paradise we can
recognize clearly as useful behavior and behavior apparently damaging
to society now. It rests to determine what is meant by the apparently
beneficial and harmful actions of every single living creature. This
obviously beneficial and harmful conduct within the natural, ideal law,
heaven, paradise, in terms of all ideal society it must be based on the query to each individual living creature on
its actual needs, from which he or she is not willing to retreat in any
way, that they want from in the terms of all ideal society, virtually
natural law, heaven or paradise, what it should be absolutely
and what it must not be absolutely in them. More precise
definition of the requirements arising from the responses of living
creatures within the contract formation process of the natural, ideal
law, description of in terms of all ideal society, the heaven
or paradise and their summary we get the content of natural law, the
precise definition in terms of all ideal society, heaven or paradise.
The response of individual living creatures that cannot understand the
question and answer, it must be based on their hypothetical response
expressed by their eligible representatives.
My answer to
the question what I require absolutely from natural law,
virtually from in terms of all ideal society, is:
Unconditionally I do not want unnecessarily
suffering and dying of living creatures. Unconditionally I do not want, that gradually the life
and health of any person, animal, plant, fungus or other
living creature were threatened unnecessarily seriously.
Unconditionally I want to use science and
genetic code for all the living creatures to be resurrected without
undue delay, that want to live and they died, or, that they did not die.
Absolutely I want to satisfy the most the
needs of all living creatures (which in my view, depends on
the vigor, energy see the following texts in the literature) with the free and genuine consent of the affected individuals.
Absolutely I want, that my life partner was
with me alive, if she so wished and she was faithful forever.
Other unconditional demands, which, together with my demands should
determine the content of orders of an ideal natural law, in terms of
all ideal society, , the heaven or paradise which in a fair
applicable law and behavior we try as closely as possible, they should
come from anonymous sociological
survey with the polls for all the people, what
individual people want necessarily as the content of the natural, ideal
law in the terms of everybody ideal society, heaven or paradise.
After we will know the form of this in terms of all ideal
society as result from a query for individual people, it will be
possible to verify the truth or usefulness of various world religions
and existing laws of different states
depending on, whether we approach the fulfillment of their religious or
legal commands and prohibitions in our daily life of this in terms of
all ideal society in a particular case or we move away from it. In my
view the result of this future verification of the religious norms of
behavior will be like in the case of any other human sciences their partial acceptance and partial rejection, which
is possible because the invisible in terms of all ideal society as a
reward of fulfillment of these religious and legal obligations and
prohibitions it becomes obvious due to the above-mentioned sociological
survey.
Literature:
Právní
nauka pro školy i praxi. Novotný
Z.. Schelle K., Tomancová J. a kolektiv, vydala MU
v Brně, ČR, 2002
Malé
dějiny filosofie, STORIG, H.J., Praha, Zvon, 1991
Irwin's
business law, Klayman EI, Bagby JW, Ellis NS, publisher Richard D.
Irwin, Inc., USA, 1994.
Philosophy of
Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
Vztah
mezinárodního práva
veřejného a soukromého a
vnitrostátního práva z pohledu
upravovaných společenských vztahů, JUDr. Dalibor
Grůza Ph.D., http://www.e-polis.cz/ ,
2006
Poměr
uváení a vázanosti
státních orgánů
právními normami, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.,
2007, http://www.e-polis.cz/
Budoucnost
práva, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz/
Smlouva a
donucení, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz/
Filosofie
ekonomického prava, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.,
2007, http://www.e-polis.cz/
Spravedlivá
válka (bellum iustum), JUDr. Dalibor Grůza
Ph.D., 2007, http://www.e-polis.cz/
III. / B) The correction of
the three deadly sins of democratic Western civilization
Western democratic States and their
inhabitants, who live in economic sufficiency, which is on the one
hand, the cause, that their inhabitants agree with the democratic
social contract, which the foundations were laid in his works by the
English political thinker John Locke, on the other side the economy sufficiency
and
from it followed consent of Western populations with democracy, they
are the cause of further improving the economic product of these
countries. Thus a growing consensus of Western populations makes it
possible to allow them, that their energy is increasingly used not for
the mutual conflicts and wars, but that this release of energy was used
to further growth of economic product of Western countries. In other
words in my opinion the peace in society and economic growth of the
product are two communicating vessels, the
greater is the peace in society, the more is an economy grows and the
more is an economy grows, the more is the peace in society.
Developing States and their
inhabitants often live in economic scarcity, which in my opinion is the
main reason for instability in the political establishment of these
countries. Therefore their inhabitants disagree with the political
establishment of such society, as well as with the breakdown of the
world into rich and poor States it is with an international global
social contract, based on a United Nations. Their inhabitants use also
their energy to the escalation of disputes and wars between themselves
aiming to achieve economic sufficiency in developing countries, through
the simplest way, which is based on violence. In my opinion permanent
wars in society and the economic lack are two communicating
vessels, wars and conflicts in society caused
by economic scarcity and economic lack causes wars and the
increasing conflicts.
The reason for
this is, that in both developing and in Western democratic countries
people are born with different vigor, energy, where energetic
people have greater needs
of assets and less
vigorous people have less need of assets that can be supplied either
through the growth of economic product of the society or violent
redistribution of property within the
society.
Western democratic States, if they do
not want to be on the one hand in the growing conflicts as civil wars
in the developing countries, widespread economic and humanitarian
immigration, the threat of nuclear weapons, etc. and
the economic losses resulting from this inefficient spending
of power, energy of the people in developing countries, and on the
other hand, if people of the Western democratic countries
feel people dying because of war or hunger or lack of health
care in developing countries as an obstacle to their own happiness, they have a
duty to act by accelerating the economic growth of developing
countries, of which result in my opinion there are both
increasing the consent of their people with the State establishment,
virtually the increasing rate of peace in the developing countries and
ultimately also their democratization.
How do I act
against economic deficiency in developing countries? Firstly, it is
necessary for Western democratic States to
ensure, that in developing countries no person had to die because of
hunger, thirst and cold. It is thus an obligation
of democratic States living in economic quantity to provide the
necessary humanitarian assistance to victims in developing countries at
risk of starvation, thirst and cold. The humanitarian aid is
in terms of economies of Western democratic States negligible, but in
terms of the consent of the people in developing countries with
international social contract it is urgently required. Secondly, it
should be established international community
of Western democratic States characterized by a common economic space
virtually market, possibly currently providing international mutual
most-favored-nation treatment in the private and public mutual
relations aimed at gradual adoption
of developing countries in this community through
progressive implementation of economic and political aspects, resulting
in approaching developing and Western democratic countries in
these aspects. An example may be enlargement
of the European Union about Eastern European countries, where the
economic and political pressure would be connected with economic
assistance and benefits provided to these Eastern European
countries. The provision of economic assistance and economic benefits
for developing countries it should be ensured either by
development taxation in force in the
member States or member States' contributions to the budget of
the international community of democratic Western States.
The second of these deadly sins of Western
civilization is, if also on their territories people are dying of
hunger, thirst, cold or lack of routine health care. This is
particularly the problem of homelessness. Moreover that situation
raises opposition of people, some of whom may not be happy
themselves, when other people suffer
next
to their home, there are also economic losses through the inefficient
expenditure of energy of these people. This humanitarian
aid is in terms of economies of Western democratic States
negligible, but in terms of the consent of the peoples of those
countries with a democratic social contract analogically to the
above-mentioned case of developing countries it is absolutely
essential.
The third deadly sin of Western civilization is
the relationship of people to living creatures. It is necessary to see the evolution of humans
and living creatures, where the man on one side is able to create
burgeoning legal persons not under compulsion but mainly on the basis
of an agreement, we can say, that one increasingly civilizes, on the
other hand the evolution of other living creatures is reflected in move
of their skills such as tool use, communication, etc. closer to humans,
where the other living creatures have the benefit from the presence of
humans, when their evolutionary approximation to humans is happening
much faster than the evolutionary development of man himself or
herself. From the above perspective it should be seen in living
creatures that current law considers as the thing in the legal sense,
the future subject of law with full legal capacity. In my opinion the people or another
living creature cannot be fully
happy now and to relieve fully individuals of
suffering in our world, if other people as well as other living
creatures suffer, or are unnecessarily killed. A man who needlessly
kills living creatures is so accustomed to death. A person, who is able
not only to understand the
desire for a world without any suffering, but also to control their
conduct, he or she is responsible not only for themselves and their
kind, but also for the establishment and development of other living
creatures to this ideal.
In
my opinion Western democracies should currently limit eating
of meat and other animal products from killed animals, which are so
needlessly killed in the millions. I realize, that not to
kill animals it is a matter of moral and it cannot be
effectively enforced by the law even in western democratic States now.
However, it should be clearly
said
by the law for the protection of animals in
these countries, that needlessly to kill another living being is
immoral, even if it is a death without unnecessary suffering of an
animal. Living creatures, which law of
western democracies will not consider as the thing, but as a living
creature like a man, that feels the suffering and pain, they should not
be unnecessarily killed by a man.
Means of
such a rule of law until the complete legal prohibition of unnecessary
killing of living creatures it should be during a transitional
period a meat tax (on the death of animals) that would
tax and thus it limits the eating of animal products from killed
animals. Purpose of
this law would highlight the inalienable value of the life of every
living creature in nature, where the man nearest living creatures or animals feel pain also like a man, they would be
protected not only through the current laws, which are often
toothless, of the ban on torture and humane killing of
animals, but also through this meat tax. At the same time we
could fulfill with the amount of the tax
rates for each species other purposes of this Act on the meat
tax, i.e. favor the killing of the
least evolutionarily developed animals such as fish and birds
rather than mammals, etc. because they have less perfect
brain, as a result they feel less pain and less suffering experienced
by their death. Another purpose of this Act would allow
to omnivores and carnivores to eat meat in the above cases of absolute necessity, in the
first place from carrions. A side
benefit of this Act on meat Tax would tax yield
for the Treasury. In the law there should be
exceptions in the form of tax breaks for
people, who have to eat more meat for health reasons.
Literature:
-
Philosophy of Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
- Filosofie
ekonomického práva, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., www.e-polis.cz
III. / C) Ideal State in terms
of Philosophy of Balance
The State is
currently material movement, where material motion systems-facts, i.e., clouds of particles of nonzero mass
of the downstream movement interfere, the movement is disjointed,
discontinuous, because
individual material movement systems-facts collide in the form of
collisions of particles of nonzero mass, ultimately with a zero-weight
space-time points of these material movement systems-facts and it is
thus a continuous decrease and increase of movement, momentum
of these material movement systems-facts, individuals, it is the war
for movement, momentum, virtually energy-power.
Discontinuous motion of matter-particles of nonzero mass is in partial
opposition to a continuous
movement and immobility of particles of zero mass, i.e. all points of
space-time, i.e., pure movement, pure
waves, from which either through an infinite number, or the speed of
light of these particles all the facts
are
consisted in the material
world. The movement of particles of zero mass, the points of space-time
is invariant, the particles are eternal, indestructible, which is
derived from the law of conservation of energy, virtually momentum.
These points of space-time do not collide only to touch each
other.
The aim of the
ideal State as well as the ideal law in a particular moment in time of
the State it is the sustainable approach to continuous form of
movement and immobility of particles of zero mass, all points of
space-time. The objective in terms of the State as
material movement system it is to achieve maximum sustained momentum
(i.e., movement, power) of each physical movement sub-system-individual
or of other elements of State with a minimum of collisions with other
material motion systems-factors with maximum sustainable
momentum-power, movement, therefore, also outside of the State. It is perfect objective ideal momentum-motion.
It means also maintaining of every living physical movement system-an
individual within the State, if he or she does not directly threaten
the existence of the material movement system-individual of the same or
higher order and the danger cannot be averted otherwise, except in the
case of averting the risk (i.e. a necessary defense or extreme
emergency).
Semi-discrete
form of the State
as
imperfect material movement system-fact, that means constant multiple
collisions of particles of nonzero mass of living material movement
sub-systems-individuals
in a tangible-material form of
struggle for power, i.e., for movement, momentum,
virtually energy of movement sub-systems- individuals, driven by fear
for their existence in the form of starvation or death in revenge of
oppressed, so it is causing constant energy, virtually momentum,
kinetic losses (of power), consisting in destruction of existing
tangible-material motion systems-individuals and other facts, the
particles are out of the existential interval of movement, momentum
density-power. In turn the perfect and imperfect continuous form of State
as material-movement system is really similar to the movement of
particles of zero mass, the
maximum total (absolute) momentum, movement (i.e. power) of the State
as tangible-material motion system-fact at the time sustainable with minimal clashes
with other tangible motion systems-facts in terms of eternity with the maximum
sustainable momentum-power movement.
In the accomplished
time it will be absolute
(total) momentum, motion-power of the State identical to the total
(absolute) momentum-power movement of all the movement with almost no
collisions only with contact with other motion systems-facts with sustainable momentum-power movement,
the eternal State. The objective ideal momentum-power, movement of the
individual is identical to the objective ideal momentum-power movement
of the whole, the State and the individual
want the maximum sustainable momentum, movement (i.e. power) without
collisions with other tangible motion systems-facts with maximum
sustainable momentum, motion-power and momentum, the movement (i.e.
power) of a State is maximum and sustainable in given time, where also
momentum, movement (i.e. power) of each of its individual is maximum
and sustainable. This will be the only one material movement system, a
single cloud of particles of nonzero mass of the downstream movement of
its particles, which would not collide but only touch and continuously
transmitting the energy to cooperate.
Therefore State system and State law should be conform to the
level of its subjects, that it was the maximum sustainable momentum,
movement (i.e. power) with a minimum of collisions with other
tangible-material motion systems with the maximum sustainable power, movement at a
time. Such a State system
requires permanent approval
of those covered, and even also the ensuing possibly fictitious
approval after their death following, that in the case of the State
system it is a sustainable approach to the maximum momentum, movement
(i.e. power) of the State or the individual.
Approximation to the maximum sustainable momentum (i.e. power) of
material movement system (in this case of the State and individual)
without collisions with other motion systems it is thus a
gradual process, where the maximum momentum-power movement is simply an
ideal, to which we are trying to approach.
In view of this
ideal, i.e. a maximum momentum, motion-power of the material movement system-the individual and State sustainable
without collisions with other tangible motion systems with maximum
sustainable mobility, motion-power, the
present democratic
State can
be reproached in particular,
that it excludes in sharing of power, rights and
obligations the other living organisms, including animals, which feel
also the pain and suffering like a man, they have a common evolutionary
origin like a man, but they have the disadvantage, that they operate at
a lower stage of development than a human.
III. / D) Natural
Law in terms of Philosophy of Balance
What is the ideal state of man and nature in terms of their
concept like material motion systems (i.e., clouds of material particles with nonzero
mass of the downstream movement)-the facts with a minimum of collisions
with other tangible-material motion systems, virtually the particles with the maximum sustainable
momentum-power movement, while preserving all living motion system whether good or bad.
Law can be
distinguished in this respect as the just and natural. Just law corresponds to the maximum sustainable approach to
the maximum momentum (i.e. power, movement) of individual or State at
the time, because the maximum sustainable momentum-power of all
individuals in the State means also the maximum sustainable momentum,
motion-power of the State at the time. Such
legislation requires permanent
approval of those covered, and the ensuing possibly fictitious consent
after their death following, that this law is a sustainable approach to
the maximum momentum (i.e. power, motion) of State or individual, a
single material movement system with the continuous movement with minimal
collisions of particles.
Natural law corresponds to the maximum sustainable momentum (i.e. power) of an
individual or State without collisions of particles, only the touch, it
is probably omnipotence of the individual corresponding to the merger
of the individual with the Universe, i.e. all movement and stillness,
and the only consciousness of this movement.
Seeking synergy of the physical reality, one is to that law only closer, his or her
model is a continuum of particles with a zero-mass, photons, all points
of space-time, which is hidden beneath the surface of materials. From
this perspective everyone
(also other living organisms) and everything will form
the only one Being with
only one consciousness. This law can
be considered as agreed by all individuals of living nature, because it
allows the maximum momentum, movement (i.e. power) of the State and
individuals. This law is just an ideal, which in a given time, we are
only closer, our task is to
achieve the maximum possible sustainable approach to this ideal, or a
maximum momentum, movement, or omnipotence, namely the unity of each
and everything, at a time. Such law can be
regarded as fair from the above reasons.
The concept of
just law builds upon the concept of the material world as a
transitional phase of incoherent world of individuals over the
continuous world of movement and immobility of particles of zero mass,
space-time points without any collisions only with a touch of
space-time points, which is consistent with a probably single
consciousness in my conception of the God, which is necessary
gradually to approach and to bring a natural law.
2.8 About beautiful (aesthetics)
Introduction
Formation:
Highest desire of us- the people
is the experience of all harmony,
so of good and evil
of total coagency.
Total coagency
is right God,
meeting with him
we can through
art.
Art links
material
sensory contracoagencies
to
suprareasonable and suprasensorial
God's Harmony.
God in thought
he is non-life,
but through the hands of artists
he becomes real.
God in a mere mass
he is in being lost,
in the infinite multiplicity
he is hardly to find.
Art allows us to
recognize
existent harmony,
both
of weight
and in
invisible agency.
Sensorial agencies
are good or bad
within the number
of material given.
Even in a mere matter
we find the center
between good and evil
with the least resistance.
Extrasensorial number
to our material sphere of agencies
simpler agencies are,
as well as more complex.
Our minds perceives
perfectly only material agencies
imperfect agencies of same number
as it is too.
Imperfect in existents
our mere human mind understands,
simpler and more complex agencies,
than material sense percepts .
To penetrate to
the overall agency,
to God's
inclusive harmony
it is possible through art,
through perception, thinking and emotion.
Imperfect it is thought
through human senses saturated,
actually to experience
it can only emotion.
Emotion penetrates
into God's harmony,
to the lowest
and highest
acted good and
evil.
Art is thus
threefold,
the highest in supracocontracoagency then,
however,
the presence of God
himself is,
which is captured
out and by sensorial harmony.
The road to it leads
through senses as well as thinking
only imperfectly,
just perfectly entering in the emotion.
Furthermore you can view
material agencies balance,
that our emotion percepts
one can use senses but also the idea.
All these existent and overall agencies
are supracocontracoagency,
the center
of
all good and evil,
that opposes at least these agencies.
And now the third time
the image of
Christ and the Devil agency,
of the suprasensorial good and evil
is in mass of artist.
Evil is contraagency
that destroys the common,
good is coagency
creative to common.
Harmony of
agency
is subject to
change
depending on, how in the history
the coagencies change.
Therefore the value of art
time changes,
other it is of course now,
other tomorrow again.
Art, that in the number of
events
remains in the historical center,
in fact it is timeless,
as the number of events is increasing over time.
It depends also on the viewer and the
environment,
in which the work is exhibited,
they also
belong to subagency,
which contributes to the overall harmony.
If the
work is only artist´s
personal
expression,
it must be suprasensorial
good or evil.
Such art,
which is not harmony
or it does not penetrate the material,
it is recognized in its value.
Arts
People also as a work
of art are material motion system, a cloud of particles of nonzero
mass, with the downstream movement, momentum density, a momentum p=m*v,
where p is the momentum, m the mass and v speed, per unit of volume,
which is a cubic meter, with characteristic more or less continuous
arrangements of momentum virtually energy density-motion, which
interact by collisions of particles. Artwork
is then a model (see section Model and the idea of Chapter 2.3 About basis of
being (ontology)), a material movement system with a relatively
low absolute (global) momentum-motion, but it contains particles of
momentum similar or associated with momentum-motion of the original
model. Thus one can say, that the particles of artwork constitute a
source of waves, which are mediated by particles of nonzero mass,
ultimately of a zero-weight, space-time points, which resembles waves
emitted by the draft of this model, virtually which is an original
model.
What allows effects of artwork, virtually model
(see section Model and idea of Chapter 2.3 About basis of
being (ontology)) in the human mind,
virtually the human organism? The human mind stores additional models,
in the form of particles of momentum density-movement adequate
to the momentum density-motion of real phenomenon, but with lower
absolute (total) momentum-movement than it has this real phenomenon.
Each of these patterns in mind is characterized by subjective ideal
momentum-motion, a maximum short-term movement-momentum and by ideal objective momentum-movement, a
maximum momentum-movement in terms of eternity. If the artwork as a
model has the ability to emit particles corresponding to this ideal
momentum-motion, virtually it corresponding waves, then there is the resonance
of particles of model in mind and model of artwork and
the artwork does a deep emotional experience.
In my opinion,
a work of art can capture in principle three
kinds of model. One is the creation, the
other is the destruction, and the third is that coherence of creation
and destruction, the only harmonic Being. In terms of Philosophy of
Balance of the exact sciences they are concerned the formation and termination of material motion system-phenomenon
and third it is concerned the total material motion system (i.e. a single cloud of material particles of
positive mass with the downstream movement and stillness formed by
everybody and all)-reality of
this termination and formation i.e. a God, then the community of
everyone and all ultimately, precisely speaking, the reality of the
overall movement and stillness, it's concerned merging with the
Universe.
Artwork
penetrates to the above-mentioned three drafts of the artwork as a
model by means of material facts, in other words it is shown in the mass. Mass
as well as any other movement is the movement of particles ultimately
of a zero-weight, space-time points with a characteristic momentum
p=m*v, where p is the momentum, m the mass and v speed, within a
momentum interval. The image of movement outside the matter is then
allowed by momentum projection of displayed movement in a material
interval of momentum, movement represented by material resources. This
is to maintain a relationship of momentum-motion of displayed
phenomenon rather than to preserve the absolute (total) values of
momentums-movements.
Since in the
mind itself there is no longer a real movement but its model, which has
much lower absolute (total) momentum-motion than the perceived
phenomenon, the impact of art in fact is mediated by induction so
strong resonance in the mind of man and through it in his or her body,
that this feeling will become the
program of his or her acts. Therefore the
draft of work of art must be a subjective or objective ideal
momentum-motion, which is so strong in the human mind, virtually in the
body of people, that it produces at them a strong emotional experience,
which influences also non-negligibly their actions, virtually activity
of the organism as a material motion system-phenomenon, a cloud of
material particles with the downstream movement.
In this way,
thus through a resonance of the mind and the body of man as material
movement systems, a cloud of particles of nonzero mass and the related
momentum or movement, in terms of the Philosophy of Balance of exact
sciences in nature all the action on the individual happens, which
takes the form of collisions of particles of material motion
systems-phenomena of low absolute (total) momentum-movement, and it is
also outside of art. Therefore, in my opinion through the waves of the proper momentum
density-motion one can cause
formation, healing and death of the organism. And the art may act also so through a mind on the overall state of the
organism.
How does the
draft create a strong emotional experience of body through resonance
with movement inside of the body and mind? They are the movements of
momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume, causing termination
of many material motion systems
as the apocalypse, death, murder, blood, etc., further causing the formation of many material motion systems
as the birth, the emergence of the world, of the Universe, healing crowd and human, etc., which is related to subjective
ideal momentum, move of the human organism as a material
movement system, where the body moves with the maximum short-term
momentum, and it is an image of movement of harmony of formation and
termination ultimately the image of God
as community of everyone and all, which can
be viewed as heaven or paradise and hell, peace and war on Earth, but
also embrace of man by man, a beautiful natural still life in the
storm, grassland, etc., which is related to an objective ideal
momentum, motion, when the body moves with maximum sustained momentum,
movement.
The knowledge
of the movement of formation and termination of motion systems is
subject to change depending how on the course of human history it
extends the knowledge of the movement of the world, ultimately of a
zero-mass particles, photons. Art is timeless, if it raises a
strong emotional experience, thus if it resonates with the mind and the
human organism also with a growing knowledge, virtually increasing in
conflict of man with the movement of the world, virtually its
particles.
Music
Music one can define as
a harmonic sound.
In terms of Philosophy of Balance of the social sciences it is
concerned the coagency, in terms of Philosophy of Balance of the exact
sciences it is concerned a related and continuing movement, where the
individual particles, ultimately of a zero weight, i.e. space-time
points, move same or scale, i.e. it is concerned the movement
alternating with larger and smaller momentum, motion, virtually in the
case of particles of zero mass, space-time points, the alternately
accelerating and alternately retarding movement of these particles.
Music source is a source of this movement of particles in
the final result of zero mass. This movement is the expression of
another movement, which is
converted into a musical movement, which is
a transformation of physical energy of a musician and musical
instrument.
Music as sound
is so the waves or motion of particles that are ultimately of zero
weight, points of space-time and through
material particles collisions with other particles in the
final result of the zero weight in the space, so there is a
proliferation of the wave.
Examples of
sources of music are stringed
instruments. If the string is stretched up,
we create a different internal movement of particles inside of the
string according to the strength of tension in a particular place.
Playing stretched string it produces the movement of the string, which
is the sum of the internal movement of particles of string. This
movement spreads then through the aforementioned manner as space waves.
Likewise it is for other types of musical instruments than string.
The most
important factor in music is human. Man
under the Philosophy of Balance of the exact sciences is also a complex
movement, which has their natural
average momentum, the movement per unit of space-volume (momentum
density), which is for the body's natural and healthy. At the same time
such a person is so exposed to collisions with particles of the other
motion systems-phenomena in their surroundings, which reduces,
virtually increases their average momentum density-motion and thereby they are destructive
to the human organism.
Particles of
the human body have a natural density of an ideal motion, i.e. momentum
density, therefore the momentum per unit of volume, in which it is the
maximum sustainable momentum or the movement possibly sustainable in
the short term, this is so the momentum, motion, when a person creates
a single harmonic motion system, characterized by the downstream
movement of its particles, one soul
composed
of everyone and all, or this is only a partial movement system
consisting of material particles, which finds itself in short-term in
the conflict with the movement of other material particles. In other
words it is frequency of waves, whereas the waves or the movement are
the property both of material bodies and also of physical waves. In
reaching this frequency, virtually human exposure to this frequency,
the person feels good because particles
of his or her body resonate, they follow by their movement on this
ideal natural frequency of sound waves, virtually by their momentum
density-motion. The essence of music listening is
the resonance of body particles ultimately of a
zero-weight space-time points and particles of sound waves, virtually movement. Music
approaching or moving away from this resonant frequency it evokes in us
a pleasure, virtually
disliked feeling. Likewise in us the music
can evoke different feelings, when it is approaching the movement,
momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume, virtually frequency
of waves, which are specific for particles of waves of a
particular material body or phenomenon. An example is a storm, the
creek gurgle, tension, release, etc.
Like the music
works pleasure or dislike or otherwise in our mind on the basis of the
resonance, following the movement of particles, creating a single
motion system (i.e. a cloud of material particles with nonzero mass
with the downstream movement, momentum density), in my
opinion it may act positively and negatively on the
individual particles with a positive weight in the final result of zero
weight, points of space-time and by them formed clusters as atomic
particles, atoms, cells, organelles of cells, tissues and organs
through their exposure to the specific movement of particles through
the collision with them. This gives rise of either the
resonance-following motion of
particles in an objective ideal frequency, the movement of these bodies
as physical objects characterized by de Broglie waves, it is concerned
the frequency, a move, when the organs achieve the maximum sustainable
momentum-motion, or of difficulties in frequency of waves virtually
move of momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume, which is
not their objective ideal momentum density, virtually frequency,
movement (defined above), but it is not yet in terms of these organs
destructive. It is thus a
movement, of which movement-momentum density is lower or higher than it
is the natural ideal momentum
density-motion
of particles of organism or its above sub-groups to create a single
motion system, a single cloud of tangible-material and intangible
(space-time points) particles with the downstream movement and
stillness, one soul consisting of everyone and everything, but yet
it does not damage them by collisions with particles, of
which momentum density-movement exceeds the momentum
density-motion of particles of
human body such as the border of destruction (it is a momentum-move
beyond the existential value of the interval of movement, momentum
density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume of the body)
Exceeding this momentum density-motion it means the destruction of the
above groups of particles of human body, the decay of the
downstream movement of material particles of the human body as a motion
system.
On the basis of
knowledge of music as waves resounding positively or negatively in our
minds, so we can probably
heal the mind, because the exposure of
particles of mind to music movement is through particle collisions with
the mind to restore movement within the existential interval of
momentum density-movement, it is momentum per unit of volume,
of the human mind, which is a prerequisite for the proper functioning
of the human mind at the momentum density-movement or frequency of
waves, which is own to mind and in which the mind
resonates (i.e. ideal movement, momentum density of mind).
The same we may
treat
in my opinion, others human
diseases based on knowledge of music, when
the knowledge of our own resonant frequency, virtually objective ideal
momentum density-movement, or a maximum sustainable
mobility-movement creating a single motion system, one soul
consisting of everyone and all, of other human organs and
their gradual exposure to this kind of movement it affords them to
regenerate, to restore the ideal objective momentum density-motion (see
above), virtually movement, momentum density in the existential range,
virtually resonant frequency of these organs by collisions of particles
with this objective ideal momentum density-motion, here I am thinking
about sustainable gradual approaching the maximum sustainable
momentum-motion. It will restore their own resonant frequency,
virtually objective ideal momentum density-motion of body particles in
the final result of zero mass, and their groups mentioned above,
altered by collisions with surrounding particles of different
frequency, virtually momentum density-motion, i.e. momentum per unit of
volume.
God and Music
If one imagines
the world as a movement of particles in the final result of the zero
weight space-time points, we find, that the world is continuous, where
a motion passes in the second motion continuously, i.e., the world is similar to the harmony of music,
continuously transitioning from one to another waves.
This applies also to
material things, where physics proved the
so-called de Broglie waves in the material world, however there are
differences of momentum-movement in the transition of one-movement
system-phenomenon in other larger than that is in the world of
particles of zero mass, which are linked, in other words material
things are seemingly separated - discrete. In a world of pure movement
and immobility of particles of zero mass, space-time points there is so
only one movement system-intangible reality, which are graded according
to their mobility, movement, continuously transfer from one to another
with increasing and decreasing momentum-motion.
In the world of
matter that is not apparent. The mass
allows the juxtaposition of movement of very high momentum-movement and
movement of low momentum such as vacuum and space ship and the transfer
of momentum values of motion systems is a jump, discontinuous,
things collide into each other.
Man is so
partly heterogeneous, imperfect motion
system-fact,
where there are large differences in the momentum-movement of their
individual parts. The
customization, virtually to develop harmoniously motion system-reality also in terms of mass
it occurs throughout
life of
people
gradually and even in the
contribution of his or her consciousness, which corrects mutually
disparate parts of their material movement system-fact. Means of that
correction are particles collisions of material
motion sub-systems-phenomena, the clouds of particles of
nonzero mass of continuous momentum, virtually movement, where mutual
encounters of motion systems-phenomena through the collisions of particles they lead to the formation of a
single whole. The whole process of reconciliation of the material world
it can be likened to a cauldron of soup, to which we added all sorts of
ingredients, and that is so long to cook until a soup has a single and
harmonic taste or substance.
Why is a
purpose of God as harmonic movement and immobility of particles in the
final result of a zero-weight, space-time points to fold the
material facts as a jigsaw puzzle into a single unit resembling a
harmony of music, where individual parts are separated in the mass,
that their mutual influence was not immediate but gradual, so it could
be corrected incorrectly folded material movement
systems? The answer is clear, the person after his or her death and the world after
its termination, or earlier to become part of harmonic movement and
immobility of particles, in the final result when the righteous people,
of zero weight, space-time points, they always spread in nature, which
I see as pantheistic God. God is
so a conscious kinetic (motion) energy, consisting of both the mass and
the emptiness which results from expansion of the Universe, when it
comes to energy conversion of material into growing space, which arises
from the law of conservation of energy (see Chapter VII.) Physical
theory of relativistic energy ).
The human world
of matter, which we perceive only as the surface, i.e. a matter, not as
pure continuity of movement, virtually energy of particles, ultimately
of a zero-weight, space-time points, it should become the part of this
connection, when there is unity of all, that it can be said the only
total consciousness which will be harmonic as an endless song or
musical composition and eternal.
The human
world and human hereby included in the overall movement he or
she will become more than now harmonic with a
total, which he or she
will not see as an external factor, but as his or her part. At the same time his or her capabilities greatly increase, because as part of a whole he
or she become powerful
with this total of movement, the continuity
of particles in the final form of zero-weight, space-time points,
because apart from him or her there will be no more.
It is
questionable, whether the existence of one consciousness has rather the
character of collective unconscious of parts of the overall movement
system-all points of space-time i.e. parts of a single movement
system-phenomena or it will be more like a collective consciousness. In
my opinion collective
unconscious is more characteristic for the
disharmonic material motion sub-systems-facts, when each consciousness of material motion sub-system-individual
recognizes only him or herself. For only one total motion
system-reality, a cloud of particles of the downstream movement,
virtually momentum, i.e. all points of space-time, all the energy that
has consistent and harmonic nature, in my opinion it is rather
characteristic uniform
and total harmonic consciousness of all its
parts, the only one then harmonic material (particles of nonzero mass)
and intangible (particles with zero mass) movement system-individuals,
i.e. the only one cloud of particles with a positive and ultimately
with a zero-weight, space-time points with the downstream movement,
virtually momentum.
What happens to
the man before birth and after death, sooner than total and harmonic
one-movement system-reality is achieved in the world of matter. One
becomes part of the collective unconscious and then he or she or their
followers realize themselves, when they become part of that single and
harmonic consciousness, that includes all the moves as the overall
material and intangible movement system-all reality or power that is so
omniscient. Until then they are aware only their past, the
matter, of which he or she is created and organic molecules have their
history in particular only in terms of the collective unconscious. Such
awakening as a result of a single harmonic collective consciousness it
can be compared to resurrection
of the dead.
3rd PHILOSOPHY
OF PSYCHOLOGY
Introduction
FOUNDATIONS OF PHILOSOPHY OF PSYCHOLOGY
Supracocontracoagency
(God):
In the man there is a fight
of two
sensations of consciousness:
feeling of
exclusivity and
a sense of
company.
Contra-(or
contraco-) agency (Devil)
The first is feeling
of exclusivity
Of his or her
beloved and their families
from sexual
attraction
of immediate
awareness.
Co (or
contracontra-) agency (Christ):
The second is the company sense
of all
creatures and nature
from
socio-existential necessity
of deeper
unconscious.
Supracocontracoagency
(God):
These two feelings
stand against each other
and their
imbalance
is the essence of all evil.
Contra-(or
contraco-) agency (Devil)
In case of the husband,
who is
attracted less than
most totally of
all
the imbalance
arises.
Since our husband out
we are also continuously looking
ideal
lover-partner,
and we humiliate our husband.
Husband
humiliation
in the form of evil
it generates his or her revenge
to a man superior.
So our betrayal
on our husband
as the inevitable retribution
the privacy of both accompanies.
Second imbalance
is weaker but deeper
human subconscious
than the sexual game.
It is a command
of same
admission
of General
company
outside
sexuality.
We start in the family,
where our parents
give priority to sibling
albeit only slightly.
From birth it arises initial
Complex of
Abelian-Cain
of solitude of superior
and of hatred of the humble.
Unequal love of parents
in relation to siblings
it builds the siblings
then
in the fight against each other.
Then they revenge
with their
hatred
also to parents
in their old age.
Same imbalance
in the love of both parents
once without consequences
but sometimes it's tragic.
Formula of
unequal adoption
the children transfer
further to
society
in the next superiority and humiliation.
As far greater
Outside of the family
it is always isolation
and vengeance
of each
superiority and humiliation.
This
increased rate
is coming from,
that outside
the home environment
the child is
almost without scruples.
So a little dislike in family
known as the first
immediately after their birth
they transform in the social evil.
Supracocontracoagency
(God):
How to reconcile these two feelings
in the base of the human psyche,
let us look for
the most attractive partner,
let us adopt
all the same line as ourselves.
Socially let us
act
and let us
never attack,
we do not
exceed defense
even in case of
attack.
Defense is,
where defense,
It is
only educational,
not play offensive
and finally devastating.
Evil, which is
only prevented,
it will be
eventually re-educated,
but in not defensive counterattack
we enter into an endless game.
If you make a
mistake,
we will be sure,
the other does
not destroy us
but by
punishment re-educate.
General
community
stems from all
clasp,
man kills
animal,
it also destroys other again.
Plant takes nutrients
from our water and land,
i.e. from the soil humus
or deadly dust.
The same
animals,
each is eating plant,
from which livestock secretes
manure again.
This cycle highlights,
that everything is continuous wave,
according to the theory of de Broglie waves
probably all substances wave.
This universal wave
is so unmistakable sign
of every single substance,
the first
mixes with the second.
Once you are human,
that is the higher organism
with very dense momentum,
then just humus.
From which the plant grows,
higher organism again,
where every its nutrient
is natural humus.
Such ancient fabric cycle
with the law of conservation of energy,
where the de- and composition in each case
solar energy
and vacuum cause.
This is the unity and tying
of everything and each from the non-Being,
in the
psychological field to indicate
the same
adoption of
each.
In terms of Philosophy of Balance
it is equilibrium
supraagency
of each contra- and coagency,
that is of the good and evil, in other words.
For that they desire
and in
the subconscious it is,
of every creature from the company
of human and other psychology.
And both of the creature, which mostly destroys,
and of the creature, which creates,
everyone wants
to be equally taken
and to die
without pain.
To become part
of the cycle,
which cannot do
nearly without lunch,
without
permanent birth and death,
but as far as
the smallest.
In an extreme
emergency
man also kills,
to eat and to became strong,
to defend life in battle.
PSYCHOLOGY OF PENALTY
Supracocontracoagency
(God):
First it is
psychological punishment,
because people want to be also
well accepted
by others,
this is because of their subconscious.
This feeling goes from childhood,
while siblings in the family
were not loved by parents,
some were underestimated, others superior.
Then the
underestimated revenge
to parents and siblings
but also to others, and friends,
pattern of childhood raised.
The superiors
underestimated others,
another they often hurt
or with them they fought
and they stay alone for long.
In the unconscious of adult
even as the youngest children
there is to be accepted the same
by parents but also by others.
Differences in
people taking,
The rich or poor,
powerful and powerless,
so people become
evil.
Way from this evil
human-induced
it is not only through the prison,
a ruthless executioner.
But also
through the same admission
of all evil and good
as ourselves
and thus the error balancing.
Any person, who is
model for the
other people
taking the same each and all,
they give further impetus to exemplary behavior.
So anyone who takes the same
good and evil,
poor and rich,
they will also be accepted by all the same.
This is a power of human pattern,
when the behavior of each
satisfies many
and it changes historical fact.
I do not refuse jail,
just saying, that released people
should be
accepted,
that they still remain our.
Then
penalty for these people
would be own
conscience,
because as responsibility also for felonies
they would not be rejected and revenged.
In this psychological
pressure,
which causes testing,
they should apologize to victims
and his
or her crime they remedy.
And not forced by the state power,
but the compulsion of conscience
and self-awareness
that
wants
in the soul the same adoption.
Rather than the provided penalty
I would vote for agreed punishment,
as well as each of the criminals
closed social contract.
It is not a social contract,
where it is concerned the individual´s freedom,
but to rate
of each crime and punishment
the level of social coercion corresponds.
Philosophy of
psychology
Soul and human
consciousness are chemically captured conflicts of material motion systems-phenomena, clouds of particles of nonzero mass of
the downstream movement, momentum density, i.e. momentum per volume
unit, i.e. collisions
of particles in the final result of zero mass and from an inclusive
single movement system of space-time points in the life and the
history of mankind in the form of genetic code in the form of
tangible-material motion sub-systems-of idea of low absolute (total)
momentum-movement man's consciousness
arose.
Man's consciousness and
the genetic code evolved in the course of human history as a tool for
good behavior, i.e. behavior that
keeps momentum density-motion of man within its existential momentum
density-interval of continuous motion as closely as possible the ideal
objective momentum density-movement, i.e. the maximum sustainable
density momentum-motion to create a single motion system, i.e.
downstream movement during a collision with particles of the
surrounding continuous material motion systems-phenomena, often of
divergent momentum density-motion.
In terms of
psychology and consciousness it can be distinguished subconscious, namely
movement systems-effects of so different momentum-motion, that our
consciousness includes them, but is not normally able to
percept them. It should be interested in the origin of these
hard-perceived material motion systems or phenomena or their
conflicts in the form of collisions of particles in the final result of
zero weight in our subconscious.
Overall
movement of particles in the final result of the zero mass of all
points of space-time it is a harmonic
graduated movement and stillness, the continuity, this
does not apply partly to discontinuous, imperfect movement of
matter.This harmonic movement
we are perceived in the part of our living, which can be called collective unconscious,
which is a natural knowledge of unrestricted movement of all motion
sub-systems of organs, tissues, cells, particles that make up
our body, but with less knowledge, power, movement. This natural
movement of our body parts as well as the continuous movement of ideas
captured consciously and unconsciously in our memory, we experience
mainly in dreamless
sleep as well before birth and after death, it
is a period of movement with less or no knowledge. From this
unconscious movement, when our consciousness is the part of the downstream total intangible
movement and immobility of all the points of space-time without
self-aware, our consciousness finds main
subconscious desire, i.e. objective ideal momentum density-motion about establishing the movement of all parts of our
body and other tangible-material and intangible motion system-phenomena forming the
whole movement of particles of nonzero mass, ultimately, of a zero
weight of all points of space-time, i.e. the maximum sustainable
momentum-motion, power.
The basic
experience of the collective unconscious and our own consciousness is
the feeling of a need of harmony of all tangible-material and
intangible motion systems-phenomena, of which we are members, this
feeling stems from unity, harmony and coherence of all points of
space-time. It's a feeling of belonging to all creatures and nature,
whose desires, virtually subjective ideal momentum-motion, power, i.e.
intermediate maximum momentum
density-motion,
power, given only by own body's
properties, virtually material movement system (i.e. a cloud of
particles of nonzero mass of the partly continuous movement,
virtually momentum, i.e. momentum per unit of volume) they should be
aligned, virtually partly to meet and partly to limit so
that the basic sense of the collective unconscious could be
filled.
Second basic
feeling is the sense of
exclusivity same with subjective
ideal momentum, which has its
roots in the conscious experience of the world and in the material
world, which is apparently discontinuous, patchy, disharmonic, when
matter and emptiness alternate. This
feeling is in our consciousness immediate
and superficially stronger, but in relation to the subconscious general sense
of belonging all together it is less severe and long term less powerful.
Feeling of exclusivity is clear from the partial nature of our
consciousness, consciousness of own family and also from the material
sub-form of the material world.
These two
feelings of exclusivity and a general sense of belonging all together
like standing against each other and their imbalance is the essence of evil.
These two feelings should be conciliated in our consciousness
as well as in practical life.
Expression of material form of the world is our sex drive,
when we separate a material movement system-effect from community of other material motion systems-phenomena,
because its tangible-material form is for us sexually attractive. As
they are own to us both of those feelings of exclusivity and a
general sense of belonging all together as the strongest model (see
section Model and the idea of chapter 2.3 About basis of
being (ontology) ), we should reduce
both these feelings to achieve the material movement system in
the area of models, namely the ideas that will keep the existence of
these two emotions, while it limits their momentum-power, movement
within the range of values of the existential momentum density,
movement-the existence of the downstream movement of the body and to
seek gradually to achieve the value of objective
ideal density-motion, i.e. a maximum
sustained momentum-movement
of
both of these feelings as a single and continuous material and
non-material movement system.
Generally
speaking, the settlement of two ideal momentum-movements, powers is sustained approximation to objective ideal
momentum-motion, power, i.e. maximum sustained momentum-motion, power
with respect to the persistence of subjective ideal momentum, thus it is awareness of oneself as an individual.
In other words belonging to each and all in one consciousness, in a
single Being, an imaginary new entity formed by free individuals it
needs to be gradually approaching it, that this approach was
sustainable, and it was not succeeded by movements in the opposite
direction of excessive exclusivity. In practice it is to search globally (sexually and in
character) the most attractive partner and to accept all, as I accept
myself. With the family somehow we form one
unit, one person, so the law should eliminate the conflict of interests
for publicly beneficial functions or in the case of competitive conduct
in companies, and until we succeed to reconcile a sense of exclusivity
and belonging all together in society, i.e. gradually over time to
achieve fusion of objective and subjective ideal momentum-
movement, power of society, i.e. one Being made up by free individuals
and deciding free and unanimously.
For spouses, who are less than the highest of all
totally, i.e. not only sexually attracted, it
is a discrepancy in the material motion systems-individuals. As out of
our husband we are constantly looking for the most attractive partner.
Humiliation of husband in the form of finding another partner creates
his or her revenge, these happens as to me they are
accompanied by an increase in momentum
density-motion.
Second example is the same adoption of all the material motion systems
outside the family and in family of siblings. If the parents give
priority to one of the siblings there complex arises, which I would
call complex
Abelian-Cain, which manifests
itself in hatred of the humble sibling and superior sibling, those
happens are also accompanied by the increase of momentum
density motion of movement systems-individuals. Unequal love
puts the siblings to fight against each other. Then they will retaliat
with their hatred to parents. Formula of unequal attitude the child
transfers to the society in the superiority and humiliation of other
people. This rate is higher outside of the family, because in a family a child
has
not known the general community, which is a model (see section Model and the
idea of chapter 2.3 About basis of being (ontology) ) of
accepting the same each and all as a single movement.
Feeling of exclusivity of associated subjects and partners of
family it has to serve to man as a model of a single person, a single
consciousness, which is a property of all the motion of particles
ultimately, of a zero weight, of all points of space-time, of all the
energy, i.e. the collective unconscious, and which is gradually
enforced also in material world through the conflict of particles of motion
systems, i.e. in consciousness.
This knowledge of unity and association of all movement in the
form of various subjects and objects as motion systems the man has
gradually to transfer in society and nature to achieve harmony
of all motion systems-facts in the material world and the movement as a
whole.
Soul
By empiricist there is only a sequence of sensory
perceptions and everything else is only a superstructure,
according to the
Philosophy of Balance this sensory input sequence together with objects
causing them it constitutes the human soul.
The soul consists of
each and everything and it can be
identified well with everything and each. In its essence, in the case
of the soul it is concerned the continuity
and consistency of particles of zero mass and zero dimension,
Thus all points of space-time, all
energy, which fills regularly i.e. continuously and
harmoniously all the world. This continuum of particles can be also
called the energy, waves,
movement and stillness.
In addition to
this all inclusive association of particles of zero dimension and
weight, all points of space-time, all energy, then nothing is, it is
also possible to mark this continuum as omnipotent
and omniscient God, because it is inclusive all the reality and
energy. It is also the soul and the only substance, which exists and
anything is not but it.
The soul of man
or the living creature is part of this continuum, part of the God which
does not realize itself as a whole and only as an individuals, it is part of
the overall soul. The conscious part of the human soul, our
consciousness is the consciousness of the individual person or living
creature. In the unconscious virtually consciousness as a dream
in sleep of human or living creature it is then immersed the
rest of this one soul, God, the whole continuity of particles of zero
mass and dimension, all points of space-time, the only harmonic and
inclusive energy. Therefore, there is only
one soul and it is common soul, and proper to all the living and not
living world, but man and other living creatures do not realize it and
it is hidden in the unconscious, virtually subconscious.
Yet a mystery
remains for the man how the other may guess
what I just think, or on what I am watching with my eyes,
it is because there is only one soul, which in this moment shows
outside, it leaves for a moment from our subconscious or unconscious
into consciousness. People lead
gradually to the only soul in the field of consciousness,
through the procedure of science
the possibility of communication and the unification of humanity
increases and probably also through the effects of other life, when a
man discovers gradually with the results of science that their only
soul.
To this
one soul we come immediately
also in dreamless sleep
and before birth and after death, when we
coincide with the Universe and we become part of the intangible world
of particles of zero mass, all points of space-time as a thing, when we
are unaware of ourselves. From this one soul we separate seemingly in
the conscious experience of the world when we are aware only of
ourselves as an individual and to the awareness, remembering the world
of dreamless sleep, before birth and after death we come very hardly.
They are necessary the means of deliberate action of the advancement of
science, which is able to scan the human mind and to communicate at a
distance, or a subconscious effect of our unconscious, which is always
revealed on the moment and hidden again, as the only soul is reflected for a moment
in
the conscious world.
The nature of
the human soul and the souls of the world as a single soul hidden in
our unconscious it is also a result of moral
postulates, when one has to recognize their unity with other people and
living beings and nature and they shall not unreasonably
destroy them, because they destroy really themselves and in the future,
when the nature of the soul appears as a single soul hidden in our
unconscious, he or she will be honored according to this their
behavior, which everyone will know.
Consciousness
and will
God is a continuum, i.e. harmony of particles
ultimately of a zero weight, all points of space-time, all the energy,
i.e. a kind of only one Being
with the only one soul of everyone and everything, of which
the individual is unaware and which lies in
the unconscious mind of
the individual.
How God's
consciousness looks and how it works. Human
consciousness is a
model of
reality, which consists
of particles of reality of similar momentum-movement-density, it is
motion-momentum per unit of volume as a real phenomena but of a lower
absolute total momentum-movement than the actual events. In consciousness are then modeled collisions
of particles and by them formed model motion systems, thus clouds of
particles with a continuous momentum-movement and man selects
and does through the will the
model, that suits him or her. This comes
from the second component of human consciousness that is will.
Will of human is a benchmark, which is set in the nature of
man as material movement system, a cloud of particles with a positive
weight in the final result of zero-weight of continuous
momentum-movement, where every move-every particle has an objective
ideal momentum-motion that is before given the general continuous
motion-momentum, which is the maximum
sustainable momentum-motion, i.e. without collisions with
other particles (addition and subtraction of movement) according to the
law on the conservation of momentum. Towards this ideal
objective momentum it is directed the development of the
movement of each particle, and by them formed momentum-motion systems
as the sum and subtraction of momentums-movements of particles
contained in them. The ideal
objective momentum and gradual approximation to it they
represent the will of every person, who selects this way
through their will and who feels it like an ideal, a wanted model,
design from a number of options collisions of particles tested in his
or her mind. That man's will is determined
by its essence, namely the only existing continuous movement of
particles of zero mass. It may be either the
choice of options through the will of man with an individual's
subjective ideal momentum, movement, i.e., which requires
compliance of the human body or their more or less the vicinity as a
single motion system with the continuous movement, or
to select the objective ideal momentum, movement
that requires compliance of each and all as only
one inclusive harmonic movement system with
continuous movement and stillness, thus the harmony
of more or less distant surrounding of the human
body and this human body.
Similar two
components of soul like of man, this consciousness and will
they are given when the only creature of God, one soul, the continuum,
i.e. harmony and compliance of all particles in the final result of
zero mass, all points of space-time they are also consciousness and
will.
Consciousness
of God as nature, the
movement system of particles ultimately of a zero weight of
all points of space-time, all the kinetic energy unlike humans it is not divided on model-pattern (see section Model and the idea of chapter 2.3 About basis of
being (ontology) ) and the
fact, but it is a single soul, one connection of each and
everything ultimately of zero-mass particles, all points of
space-time, except, where there is nothing, which is a harmony in each
of their internal, i.e. sub-movement,
it is a kind of agreement, continuous movement and stillness with all
other components of this connection, i.e.
compliance with all the remaining particles of zero mass, a space-time
points, which are more or less involved in this part of the internal
movement and stillness. Given this general agreement-consensus it is
not necessary, that God's consciousness was as a model and reality,
i.e. two parts, but any plan, that is agreed by each and everything,
could be made, which is a consistency and coherence (continuity), the
continuous movement and stillness of all particles of zero mass, all
the points of space-time.
While the will and consciousness blend, where
the will chooses
harmonic possibility to everything and each,
i.e. continuity of particles in the final result of zero mass, which
again means like for man the objective ideal momentum-motion, virtually sustainable approach to it. So this
option is selected by God from all possible facts, namely collisions of
particles in the final result of zero weight that is the most harmonic
and coherent (continuous), which is connected with all the remaining
particles of zero mass, points of space-time forming together all
the reality, God, it represents an enduring maximum momentum
of the movement of the sub-facts such as motion systems, i.e. a cloud
of particles in the final result of the zero weight, continuous
momentum-movement, virtually approach to it. So will of God is given like a man will by his essence,
i.e. objective but also
subjective ideal momentum-motion and stillness of the whole of each and
all that coincide with God, thus a
single cloud of particles-movement system ultimately of a zero
weight, with continuous momentum, movement and stillness. God's will
seeks so the maximum sustainable momentum-movement (with the minimum
number of collisions with other particles) of each material particle in
the final result of zero mass and by them formed motion
systems, clouds of particles with a continuous
momentum-movement, virtually approach to them by the physical law of
momentum conservation. The means
of this will is the collisions of particles, namely the transfer of
momentum (addition
and subtraction of movement).
God's will as
history is made as objective, mathematically countable. Yet in the
case of a mathematical approach we are in the calculations with infinite variables
of parts of the whole movement and stillness, because God as a
continuum of each and all, one being a single soul consists of the
infinite number of particles, it is ultimately of a zero-weight
space-time points, probably photons. From
the perspective of the individual we can talk about the calculations of
the probability due to the inability to
absorb infinity.
Also other living organisms are endowed by consciousness
and will in the above sense like the
human, i.e. by mind in the form of the model (see section Model and the
idea of chapter 2.3 About basis of being (ontology) ) and by
will as approximation to the objective ideal
momentum-downstream movement. Anyway these
two components of the soul are not developmentally perfect as
human, in other words
consciousness as material movement system consisting of particles of
low absolute total-momentum- movement but of similar momentum-motion
density of their particles such as particles of the real world, it is less sophisticated for these organisms, less detailed, a single
particle of consciousness has a higher absolute-total motion-momentum
and less comprehensive,
thus all the particles have a lower overall-absolute motion-momentum (smaller brains) than the man.
The same is true about the will, which is more distant to ideal maximum
sustained momentum-motion than of the human.
In other words knowledge hidden in the unconscious of animals and other
organisms is more extensive than in humans, animals and other organisms
are more far to understanding of God, the only one Being and
soul hidden in the unconscious of man and animal,
another organism, than it is human. This is so because a person can
hold in their consciousness through emotion
and reason the need for consistency between each and everything
(objective ideal momentum, movement), while the animal understands
through the instinct only the need to line
its body or its vicinity (subjective ideal momentum,
movement).
Reason and
emotion
What is human life with God in
a coherent and harmonic association of particles in the final result of
zero mass, all points of space-time, all the energy, which include
everything and everyone, and what is human
life in the material world it is somewhat
on the surface-horizon of the God’s world, thus in the world
of particles that are in the range of mobility-movement of particles
characteristic for the material world, i.e. particles with nonzero
mass. Difference of perception of human in the material world and the
world of particles of zero mass we can comparable
to the difference in perception of man as a whole and a cell of his or
her body as part of the whole. At the same
time man is perceiving the world in the material world using
their mind-reason, that sort of model of material world, but in the
position of infinity part consisting of a continuous and harmonic unity
of particles of zero mass, all points of space-time, the perfect model
of world with him or her as with the body's cells we do not find, a
person perceives the world, perfectly only through the
emotion.
Perfect
emotional perception of the world of particles of zero mass, all points of space-time, all energy, which
forms a single link, it means in essence that a person is as
its part the part of this unity and through
the contact with other parts
of the world experiencing this whole world
as unity, the only soul in which there is no dispute, there is one will
given by the will of a whole, with which the will of an individual is
perfectly consistent. Individual particles of zero mass, space-time
points affect directly in their movement the other particles
of zero mass, space-time points, there is nothing except
themselves, and this contact connects all these particles of zero mass,
space-time points, i.e. each and all in a single unit, which forms a coherent and harmonic
continuum, the downstream movement and immobility of the particles
without collisions. This area of particles of zero mass, all the points of
space-time it is so net
intangible energy, nature pantheistic God, which
consists of everything including the material world, and these
different parts of the world of particles of zero mass, world of all
points of space-time they experience a sense of whole through emotion,
therefore through the contact with other particles of zero mass,
space-time points. In accordance with philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead
it is the movement of particles of zero mass, points of space-time
continuum, where each part is connected with the total being, virtually
movement and stillness, and as such it is felt.
In terms of a
zero-mass particles, space-time points, then everything and everyone from my point of view the God, it is a
perfect emotional perception, because
any decision on the basis of this emotion is harmonic and continuous
and therefore a unanimous decision of the Being, one God. As a healthy
cell in the human body, so man as part of the world of a zero-mass
particles, space-time points, a single and coherent continuum he or she
decides in accordance with a total through contact with other parts in
our example, cells in the body, i.e. an emotion, and that his or her decisions are unanimous and in favor of compliance
with the total of particles of zero mass, all space-time points,
all energy i.e. God.
As it is the
case, however, of a world, where the momentum of its particles is
non-zero, i.e. in a world that has non-zero weight in relation to the
momentum p=m*v, i.e. in the
material world. This world is discontinuous, a world
of separate details that do not touch each other, they are not united
together in a coherent and harmonic unity, but the world is falling
apart on many details which are in dispute together, slamming
into each other. This is not the world of intangible
energy,
but the massive energy, where rest
mass of its parts is not equal to zero in relation for energy and
momentum.
In this world
of material power, energy, it is in the material world the
human
emotion does not already work correctly, because
one is unable to experience the whole Being, God, and to act
in accordance with it. With emotion in the material world one is
experiencing a unity with family, native place, him- or
herself, but not the whole world, this emotion
is discontinuous, only partial, that he or
she divides the world and is experiencing world as one or more of the
details according to emotional proximity and the other, foreign,
distant details to whom one feels no emotional closeness.
Thus, analogically with the nature of the world as false world of disharmonic and
disjointed details, which are in dispute, his or her emotion deceives also people in the
material world.
The substance
of the world as a single continuum, harmonic a coherent whole it is so
in the human soul hidden in its unconscious,
which conceals them the nature of the material world as a single
harmonic a coherent whole, one Being, God, one soul
(see section Soul of this chapter).
Man like
the God uses consciousness-mind,
where he or she seeks to encompass the entire material world, at least in
the form of model (see section Model and
the idea of Chapter 2.3 About basis of being (ontology) ). Reason
replaces so the imperfect emotion that convinces us of the
discontinuities and disharmony of material world, its discontinuity.
Reason-conscious models in the form of
tangible-material motion sub-systems, i.e. clouds of particles in the
final result of zero-weight of continuous movement, momentum-movement
density (momentum-motion per unit of volume), of a similar pattern
of momentum-movement
density
but of a lower overall momentum-movement than real events,
stored in the memory of man, and of their model conflict in
consciousness, the real world as a whole.
In other words, using the knowledge we imagine God, the only one Being
consisting of each and all, a single soul of each and all. In line with
this idea then we try to act
in a way, that we choose
deliberately
by will (see section Consciousness and will of this chapter) the
option, that approach us the highest
and sustainable power and that is unconsciously directed us to move closer towards
a single all-powerful Being, a
single soul of each and everything, the God.
There reason-awareness may also
be wrong-contrary to the unconscious, where
one can see sustained
increase in their power not in unity but in liquidation of their
opponents. So our unconscious disguises to
us the true nature of the world as unity of everything and each, only
one Being and soul, when we consciously perceive the world as
disharmonic and incoherent parts in the dispute, as discontinuous.
To the true
nature of the world, which we need
to approach in a reasonable-conscious life, so in the material and
seemingly disjointed and disharmonic world, so one uses both the consciousness-reason and
emotion-touching particles, ultimately of a zero-weight, space-time
points. Perfect
emotion and perfect reason bringing
together all the material world in the harmonic and coherent unity,
either through the contact of any particles of zero mass, as I
described above, or through model-design-consciousness-reason
(see section Model and the idea of chapter 2.3 About basis of
being (ontology) and section Consciousness and
will in this chapter), which encompass the whole world as well as
themselves, in the material
human world they do not exist probably,
we can only approach them through constant
improvement of ourselves.
In the
intangible world, i.e. world
of particles of zero mass, space-time
points in the world of intangible
energy
and momentum, where the rest mass of particles is equal to zero that is
by God in my conception, in the world hidden in
the unconscious of man
there is perfect emotion inherent in each its part including
man, that is experiencing through the
contact with other parts the whole Being, God, one soul, then all
particles of zero mass. An
example is a healthy cell in the body, that
works correctly not through reason but emotion, that through
the contact with other cells. Perfect
reason-consciousness is the only God's quality, who
knows
as the whole of world of particles of zero mass, all points of
space-time, each his part not in the form of model (see section Model
and the idea of chapter 2.3 About basis of being (ontology) ) but in the form of reality, that every his part.
Man
as part although in the world of particles of zero mass, the points of
space-time he or she is aware-understands through reason-knows the
whole movement and immobility, i.e. a world of particles of zero mass,
space-time points, i.e. God
in the form of design or model (see section Model and the idea of
chapter 2.3 About basis of being (ontology)). Perfect reason
in a world of particles of zero mass, the points of space-time is so,
characteristic only to a God, the man is imperfect, partial picture.
The individual
should act harmoniously to avoid
collisions except, when such individual collision of
micro particles or bodies in macro world, which consist of micro
particles (see section Evolution chapter
5th Philosophy of history ), it increases in terms of individuals and
obviously mostly probably (see section Natural and just law,
virtually contract subchapter I. General Part ) consistency of each and all, it reduces
the overall power of the collisions of each and everything. To detect by
reason such ideal, either more
educational (i.e., less defensive) or more defensive (i.e., less
educational) crash (see subchapter Just War II. Special section and chapter 6th Philosophy of Chess and Checkers ) due to the
infinite number of existing micro particles ultimately the space-time
points the emotion must decide in
case of individual finally with the help of
reason. Perfect feeling has only a harmonic individual, who
eats only plant seeds or plant fruits along with the permissible
quantity of minerals such as salt and water (see chapter III.) Nature of
the evolution of living creatures, virtually history of mankind )
Such decisions
are indeed to predict
distant future development, where reason
can provide only probable variations,
this development certainty would
give us perfect emotion that would
experience through the touch of all particles all the reality i.e. the
whole Universe (the allfeeling is
probably own only to God) through imperfect emotion of the individual, who
is experiencing through the touch of the particles only more and less
distant surroundings, we again establish only probable
variations of future. While, the
longer is the imperfect emotion of the individual, the
more perfect is the emotion. To mistake in the value
of the probability of certain variants of future development it may in
particular immediate or short imperfect
emotion of the individual, which is experiencing through
touching only a small part of reality, only
partial pressures around. Improved determination of the value
of the probability of certain option for future development it allows
us the use of imperfect reason and emotion of individual.
Reason, emotion
and will of the individual are the ways in which a person perceives the
work of brain. The brain is once again the movement of the micro
particles, which is also part of the movement of the micro particles of
the whole reality. Therefore in the brain like in reality the movement
of micro particles, virtually ideas with the greatest momentum,
virtually force always prevails. Under this approach of ideas
force in the brain they can be divided into ideas that are so
strong, that the brain will force individuals to give individual an
order to do something, not to do, or to suffer and the ideas that have
no such power and they raise doubts before such command of the brain in
the form of a conflict of different energic ideas, virtually
them forming micro particles in the brain. If the idea loses
its strength through its execution, the individual has doubts,
after that his or her action has taken place, again in the form of a
conflict of ideas of different force in the brain.
Emotion and
instinct
What is the
difference between instinct of animals and humans and emotion, a sort of more sophisticated deeper
instinct? Emotion, in my view, we call a
perfect instinct, a feeling in the above sense (see chapter Reason and
emotion), an
emotion understands so by the
contact with the surrounding motion systems as clouds of particles in
the final result of zero weight, with continuous movement and
stillness, momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume,more
perfectly the whole reality, ideally in an intangible world of
continuous, smooth, coherent and harmonic whole of particles of zero
mass, all points of space-time, in my conception the God, it is experiencing through a touch all other
particles of zero mass, space-time
points, their wishes, thoughts, will, etc.
In contrast normal instinct does not feel the whole
Being of particles ultimately of a zero-weight, space-time points, but
only a part, such as their
own body or the certain environment.
Instinct is so often
stronger than the emotion, because
it is concerned the contact
with particles ultimately of a zero weight,
or tangible motion systems, clouds of particles of nonzero
mass with the downstream movement-momentum density from the our vicinity, when
we neglect, virtually do not feel other particles in
the final result of the zero mass or movement system in our less or
more distant surrounding or in the whole reality.
What the instinct and emotion compel us then? Instinct informs us about our
immediate surrounding, virtually often the wishes of our own body, in
which the contact of particles ultimately of a zero-weight is the
strongest, instinctive
will then collects from this information such acts of man or
other organism, which is the maximum approximation to the instantaneous maximum
momentum it is power, of this motion sub-system
and its particles (mostly organism). Thus it is the subjective ideal momentum-power, movement, a behavior, with which
a person or other organism satisfy his or her needs, i.e. of
material movement sub-systems and their particles, regardless,
without feeling the rest of the world, touching other particles in
fact, ultimately of a zero-weight space-time points, virtually their
tangible-material and intangible motion systems.
By contrast,
emotion informs us about the ideas, wishes and aspirations of the wider
area touching particles ultimately of a zero-weight, space-time points,
virtually of their motion systems, ideally all particles in the final
result of the zero mass of space-time points (in my conception the
God), while the will based on emotion leads us to maximize the
approach to maximal sustainable momentum, virtually power or motion.
It is thus a fusion
of both objective
and subjective ideal momentum that is
permanent, because it is based on all the reality, except which nothing
is, on God in my concept.
From this
perspective eating of meat
it is an instinctive human behavior based on feelings of their own body
of carnivores without considering the broader context of
emotion, which understands that
even the animals, virtually other living creatures are part of our
world and total reality, with which we create unity in the form of
connection of particles of zero weight, all the points of
space-time. The carnivorous instinctive behavior, which destroys parts
of our living world, which also feel pain and are suffering, it is
surviving in ours as the instinctive behavior characteristic as well as
to other carnivorous animals or other lower organisms.
Suicide
Man as motion
system,
a cloud of particles of nonzero mass, ultimately, of a zero weight with
a related motion, he or she is satisfied, if momentum
density-motion of his or her movement system-body it
approaches the subjective
ideal momentum density-motion, i.e. a
transient maximum momentum density-movement given only by needs of own
movement system-organism, it is concerned the downstream movement of
their nearest surrounding. It must be noted that human material
movement system-body is also consisted of many material motion
sub-systems-organs, tissues, cells, particles, which are needed to
reconcile, namely to allow their common current ideal existence (see
the objective ideal momentum-motion) for example for the aware
limitation of some of those material movement
systems-phenomena, that clouds of particles of nonzero mass and
downstream movement.
In the event,
that the total momentum density-motion increases or decreases, the
momentum-motion of the body gradually finds itself near the existential momentum, motion
interval-death and it can be expected of its exceeding, man
will suffer immensely and despair, the movement even in the
immediate vicinity of people it is no longer continuous and it
leads to collisions. Similarly, it is if
material movement sub-systems-organs, tissues, cells, and
particles of a human such as material movement system-organism they are
so incompatible, virtually they destroy each other, they collide, that
a man as material movement system-phenomenon finds on the border of
existential values of momentum density-movement of him- or herself as material movement system-organism. Exceeding
these existential values of maximum and minimum density of
momentum-motion of man as material movement system, this material
movement system-organism ceases, because too high or low
motion-momentum of particles leads to detachment of the part of the
material-motion system of the organism, the movement of its parts
ceases to be related, they collide each other.
Compared despair it can be a collective unconscious,
a whole movement of particles in the final result of the zero mass of
space-time points, which represent a continuum with a single mind,
which is experiencing all this movement and in which each its
section takes part. The
desire of man to dive into the collective unconscious or a single
consciousness, which in terms of partial consciousness of man is the
collective unconscious accompanying him or her throughout his or her
life.
It should be
noted, that mission of man
in our material world is to reconcile the often contradictory
individual material motion systems of particles of positive mass and continuous
movement-facts in harmonic motion, which would be similarly connected
as the motion of particles of zero mass, all points of space-time.
This connection he or she is making in combat through the limitation of
the high momentum-movement of material movement systems-facts
that goes over the
objective ideal
momentum-motion, power, i.e. the maximum
sustainable momentum-motion, power, that it was compatible with the
existence of other tangible-material motion systems-facts and the
continuous strengthening of momentum-motion, power of motion
systems-phenomena with lower density of momentum-motion, power, than it
is their ideal objective momentum-motion, power, that the material
movement systems-events take their proper place in the scale of the
continuous movement of material motion systems-phenomena as harmonic
and downstream material motion, i.e. of particles of non-zero mass,
this is going through collisions of particles of nonzero mass.
Depending on,
how far the man has reached a material motion systems-phenomena
alignment, that their momentum-motion is compatible with the existence
of tangible-material and intangible motion systems-phenomena (i.e., achieving the objective and as well
subjective ideal momentum-movement, power of material movement
systems-phenomena), and accordingly it is reflected his or her awareness in the total single
consciousness of the material world reaching the final line of
all tangible-material and intangible motions systems-facts. In
other words a well-composed part of the puzzle of the material
movement systems-phenomena is a man's consciousness that is permanent
and, that in the future will be one part of a single consciousness of
the material world, as soon as we achieve it in the future, as
soon as we pass through the collective unconscious in a single
harmonic collective consciousness. Incorrectly composed part of the
puzzle of motion systems will be with a smaller absolute (global)
momentum-movement, power in the form of a
bad design
and in single consciousness created in the material world it will play
a negligible role.
Therefore, the
mission of man is to achieve the greatest possible harmonization of
the movement of material motion systems-phenomena during their
life and this man suicide
ends this mission. Although a person, who
commits suicide, was able during his or her life to
bring into line a number of material motion systems-phenomena,
which exceeds the mismatch resulting from the destruction of his or her
own material movement system-fact. At the same time the
person, who commits suicide, was probably exposed to a sharp fight of
incompatible material motion systems-phenomena, namely clouds of
particles of nonzero mass and downstream movement, momentum density,
i.e. momentum per unit of volume, in the form of collisions of
particles ultimately of a zero-weight, that were
needed to merge and maybe another person exposed to the fighting in the
form of collisions of particles of highly incompatible material
movement systems-phenomena he or she would not held, what the suicidal hold. Therefore,
even the suicidal, although suicide kills living cells of the body of
man, those, which are ill, and those, which are healthy, he or she
should be evaluated not only on the basis of suicide but also on the
basis of the number of saved living creatures.
Sleep
Man is
inherently a material movement system-phenomenon, it is a cloud of
particles of nonzero mass and downstream movement, momentum density,
i.e. momentum per unit of volume, the part of one continuum of movement of particles of zero mass,
all points of space-time, all
energy forming inter alia all the tangible-material
world, that surrounds us. Man is inherently also a part of discontinuous movement of particles of
non-zero mass of atoms of chemical elements. As imperfect (partially
discrete) movement system-the individual is endowed by the knowledge that is
created as the product of evolution through conflicts with many
material motion systems-facts surrounding a man in the history of
mankind. This knowledge is a property of the whole which is made up of
sub-units, individuals, further we can also talk about collective unconscious,
when a man as part of a continuum of movement of particles of zero
mass, all points of space-time he or she is not aware of him- or
herself, like the cell does not realize itself in the body.
In dreamless sleep a man
ceases to realize him or her, he or she becomes a
part of the overall
movement and immobility of particles of zero mass, continuum,
continuity of space-time points, and one is so diffused in nature,
virtually in my pantheistic God.
Thus dreamless sleep is allowing a person similarly as before the birth, perhaps also after
death to blend with a single
movement system of particles of zero mass, all points of space-time,
all energy-general reality, to which they belong. It allows body the
natural movement, i.e. movement of particles of the human body, which
is not influenced by the knowledge of man and it is here as a
self-regulated conflict of material motion systems-organs,
tissues, cells, particles of the human body restoring its natural
momentum density-motion with appropriate low absolute (overall)
momentum-motion, the power of man in their sleep.
Therefore it is
necessary in order to achieve this unknown state, when the
body acquires strength, that it occurs in unknown or knowledge
uninfluenced conflict of material motion sub-systems of organs,
tissues, cells, virtually their particles and the renewal, virtually raising of the natural movement-momentum of
material movement systems-organs, tissues, cells, particles forming the
body with appropriate low absolute (total) momentum-motion, power, i.e.
low demands imposed on humans in terms of maximum sustainable approach
to the maximum sustainable momentum-motion, power, in other words it is
sufficient continuous movement without collisions of its parts only of
human organism, not its surroundings, which one affects in a conscious
state. Example might be efforts of top athletes to bring maximum
power, when an individual makes
the movement of all particles of the organism to achieve maximum power.
This leads to continuous unsustainable movement of particles of the
organism of a higher absolute momentum-motion, than it is sustainable
momentum-motion, which is necessary for the operation of these
particles with no disturbances and to the conscious control of movement
in order to maximize performance. In sleep it is to restore the natural
movement of the body particles by re-reducing absolute
(global) momentum-movement and thus refueling forces. This stems from
the law of conservation of energy, virtually momentum, where the
increase in momentum, which is not sustainable, it must be followed by
reductions.
Dream represents a return of man from the collective
unconscious into consciousness again, from the world of motion of
particles of zero mass, all points of space-time, all power to the
interface of material and immaterial world, and into the world of atoms
of chemical elements. This intersection of the world of the collective
unconscious is reflected in the fact, that we are unable to control our
behavior, virtually to influence the behavior of other people in a
dream. At the same time as an observer we may monitor the conflict of
the material motion systems-facts, which are part of our reality as
starting and resulting material motion systems-thoughts, which
are stored as individual particles, virtually their material movement
systems, clouds of particles of nonzero mass and downstream movement,
with a very low absolute (total) momentum-motion in our mind. It is
concerned the subjective ideal momentum
of the material motion systems-phenomena, i.e. their short-term maximal
motion, hence the gradual
separation of subjective and objective motion of particles in our mind,
when this movement is no longer following the whole movement but
only our body, virtually its immediate surrounding.
An example is a
dream when we are in dispute with another in the waking state
and the dispute is in terms of a philosophy of exact sciences the conflict of material motion systems-phenomena, clouds of particles of nonzero mass and downstream
movement of two organisms, i.e. the people running as a collision of
particles of material motion
systems. This clash is
then stored in memory in the form of the model (see also section Model
and the idea of chapter 2.3 About basis of being (ontology) ), i.e. as a
clash of two such particles with a resultant momentum of the conflict,
this formula, which basically covers the whole situation, but it is
with very low absolute (total) momentum-motion, power as the idea, it
can be awakened to life in the material world only through increasing
the absolute (global) momentum-motion, power of all its parts. Yet in
the form of the model it may be means of thought combination, where we combine collisions of
material motion
systems-phenomena somehow in a small, i.e. with very low
absolute (total) momentum-motion power of material movement
systems-ideas as members of this conflict and we can then predict the
outcome of future collisions of the material motion systems-phenomena.
4th Philosophy of Religion
Christianity
and the description of a possible savior
Contemporary
christianity may be criticized, that it does not want and it denies
the consistency of material motion systems (clouds of
particles of nonzero mass and downstream movement)-phenomena in the
material world, but it promises it after death, so it accepts suffering in the material world.
In other words it separates the material world from the world of the
net movement of particles of zero mass, all points of space-time, which
is continuous or
harmonic by its nature, when we know, that the world is a world of
motion of matter, that even here it is possible to reconcile the
material movement-material facts limiting the absolute (total)
momentum-motion, power of devastating material motion systems phenomena.
It is possible to reproach Christianity for the
approach to animals and eating meat, where this religion
permits the killing living creatures and it makes the gap between
humans and other living creatures, even if it is scientifically proved,
that it is only the difference of the evolutionary development, not of
the substance. This is impossible
again to achieve harmonic world of matter in the
world, when a man as a material movement system-phenomenon i.e. a cloud
of particles of nonzero mass and of downstream movement, momentum
density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume he or she increases their
momentum-motion compared to the ideal objective momentum
density-motion, power to ensure compliance and peace of all material
movement systems-material phenomena. It is thus an incomplete good, which Christianity
raises as a requirement, it's a good way only for some living organisms such as man and
its refusal for other organisms such as animals, insects, plants,
fungi, living cells, bacteria, viruses, etc. This incomplete good causes another evil, because a person
accustomed to senseless death of other living organisms he or she
becomes crueler.
Christianity
has following
advantages, which helped it to
establish and to approach the world to the ideal
objective momentum density-motion power. In particular it
creates a harmonic material motion system-reality
among the people of the same
religion, who it calls as brothers and
sisters, it allowed in the
history the unification of the people of the Christian world.
This religion is also universal,
thus accessible to people of all races and nations, thus allowing
universal compliance of imperfect material movement system-reality of
human society, their continuing movement, but rejected for other living
organisms.
Christianity
points also to afterlife,
from the perspective of Philosophy of Balance a single all-embracing consciousness
of total continuum of movement system of all movement of
particles of zero mass, all points of space-time, all the energy, which
encompasses also the partial consciousness of all the people living in
history, animals and other living creatures. It refers namely to the
need of harmony with other
people, wrongly but not with other living creatures which endures short
human life, and responsibility for our actions against these people for
eternity.
These elements
of harmony of the motion systems-clouds of particles ultimately of a
zero weight of the downstream movement in implementing the Christian
model then they contributed to the success of Christianity in
history compared to other models that had not this universal nature.
Christianity promotes the respect and preservation of all human
material movement systems-individuals, whatever their momentum density-motion, power, i.e. if they are bad or
good, and so it makes partly harmonic material movement system-material
reality.
In terms of
Philosophy of Balance we can describe the
possible savior as living being,
probably the person who sees the world of all energy, movement and
immobility (the real world), not as a normal human in surface manner
(the world of experiance) but in its essence (the real
world). Savior should embrace at his or her emotion as well as the
God the whole real world, thus he or
she would feel all the space-time points through their
contact, in that his or her emotion he or she should experience the
world. The average person does not perceive the world of all energy,
movement and immobility (the real world) as a harmonic space-time,
virtually as all moving and stationary points of space-time that are
harmonic, uniform and continuous, the space fundamentally does not
crush and it fills the entire space-time, matter and also the absolute
vacuum, the emptiness, which touch each other, do not collide and this
mutual touch leads to the spread of the movement from one to the other
points of space-time. The average person,
unlike the savior of the world they perceive the world through their
imperfect reason and emotion (feeling), which creates an image, a model
of the world (the world of experiance), which cannot embrace
the world of all energy, movement and immobility (the real world) in
its entirety. Normal human perception (the world of experiance) approaches
only
this reality (the real world), the man, who is
not a savior, is not omniscient, virtually all sentient,
they never know the whole truth, (the real world), only the picture
(the world of experiance), but it is never quite perfect, true. The
savior, who sees a perfect world, all energy, movement and immobility
(the real world), he or she should be with this reality in full
compliance he or she acts according to his or her emotion
identified the whole truth, he or she is moving fully in line
with the movement and stillness of all the points of space-time, all
the energy (fully in line with the real world),
which is harmonic with him or her, continuous, uniform, i.e., he or she
governs his or her
behavior according to
this real world, and so he or she is omnipotent, because
the world of all energy, movement and immobility (the real world) is
also quite harmonic to him or her, also based to meet his or her needs,
respecting his or her wishes. Then with his
or her actions the Savior is fully in line with the movement
and stillness of space-time points, all energy, movement (fully in line
with the real world), he or she accelerates with his or her design to achieve
paradise in our world (the world of experiance), see 1st Part
Scientific theory of Paradise on Earth .
5th PHILOSOPHY
OF HISTORY
Introduction
And God called his two sons
together to debate,
what were and are human actions,
whether people live by law.
To the father Christ came with the Devil,
to present him their actions
and God has decided, together with the law,
what will be the human history.
History and
the history of mankind
In the case of
the history of mankind it is concerned the
agency of man
in terms of philosophy of social sciences and the human movement in
terms of Philosophy of Balance of exact sciences.
Property of
movement is generally either movement to a particular whole, or
movement from a whole. The
move to a specific whole is featured by
momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume, movement related to
momentum density, thus the continuing movement of this current movement
in a particular place of motion (i.e. of material motion
system-phenomenon, i.e. a cloud of particles of nonzero mass and
continuous movement, momentum density). Movement
from a whole is the
movement characterized by momentum density, i.e. momentum per
unit of volume, which is discontinuous virtually diametrically
different from momentum density, movement in a particular place of
material motion system-phenomenon.
Humanity's movement
is
a part of the general movement of the micro particles in the final
result of zero mass, in other words the history of humanity is a part
of the general history. General
movement is characterized by collisions of
micro particles of different value of momentum and thus promoting the
movement to a particular whole, as I described it above, promotion of maximum
sustainable momentum-motion, power, of only one downstream movement
without any collision of everyone and all across the tangible-material
and intangible movement system (the cloud of particles of zero and
nonzero mass with the downstream movement)-all the reality. In the
history of mankind then it is more probably to promote unification of humanity and all living organisms in
a consistent single society controlling all inanimate nature.
In general terms of the movement in motion of particles it creates
local material motion systems-phenomena
of the continuous movement, momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of
volume, which collide
with surrounding material motion systems-phenomena through particles
collisions and therefore there is a change of the average momentum density-movement and development of superior
material movement system-phenomenon, a cloud of micro particles of
positive weight with the downstream movement, momentum density to both
material motion sub-systems- phenomena, or it may be caused by
the collisions to move out of the interval of existential values of momentum
density-motion
of this material motion sub-system-phenomenon and its
disintegration and the formation of new material motion
system-phenomenon. The collapse of material motion system-phenomenon
occurs when its momentum-movement is through the conflict with
surrounding material motion systems-events departed for the appropriate
time away from the sustainable maximum and minimum momentum, motion,
the movement of material particles no longer follows. It should be
noted that with the increasing departure of
a momentum-movement of new particle or their material movement
system it the quantity of time decreases and with the increasing
quantity of time it decreases the quantum of departure of the
momentum-motion needed for the
collapse of the material movement system. This stems from the law of
conservation of energy virtually momentum and it is related with the
time, that movement system-phenomenon with increased or reduced
momentum-movement needs for the regeneration e.g. in sleep or
in evolution. In the history of mankind this means more
probable gradual emergence of ever larger united societies
ever more sophisticated grasp of inanimate nature, so they
are created the States, the State Unions and the international
community, which are increasingly more unified to
achieve a single Being, consisting of a single mind and a real and free
consent of all living entities, perfectly controlling inanimate nature.
The history of
humanity is so the movement of man and his or her surrounding, which is
formed by particles of that movement of non-zero mass, while it is the
subject of the general history, virtually general principles
of movement creating the material motion systems-phenomena, then clouds
of particles of nonzero mass with the downstream movement, momentum
density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume. Thus encounters between
different people and different societies with different momentum
density-motion, power of this society, virtually of this man, and their
clash with material motion systems-phenomena of surrounding are a
formation of society or human with increased or decreased momentum density-motion, power of the new material
motion system-reality that can be within the range of existential
interval of momentum density-movement based on maintaining the
original material motion system-phenomenon, its extension or its
connection or on its dissolution and the formation of new material
movement system-phenomenon. Necessary
condition of maintaining of material motion system-phenomenon, then a cloud of particles of nonzero mass with
the downstream movement, momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of
volume, it is an extension of the existential interval of momentum
density-movement of this material motion system-phenomenon through increasing in its momentum,
movement, either through the development improvement or the extension
of harmonic society. People using
the brain they may affect the probability of a phenomenon as a movement
of photons, where each phenomenon is only more or less probable, but
not sure.
From the
history of Universe
one can give an example, where the scattered particles of space dust
with similar momentum density-motion,
i.e. momentum, really energy per unit of volume they were
concentrated in one place and they created the planets and stars as a
homogeneous material movement systems, clouds of particles
with a downstream movement, momentum virtually energy density, i.e.,
momentum, virtually energy per unit of volume, which are exposed to
effects of other material motion systems-phenomena as outer space and
colliding space dust and meteorites, their momentum-motion gradually
increases or decreases through the particles collision. It is
particularly evident in the sun, which emits photons of light speed and
so there is a narrowing of the original material movement
system-phenomenon, a cloud of material particles with the downstream
movement.
From human
history it is possible to note
the human development, in the suitable climate of the end of the
Tertiary Period there are extended flora and fauna and the first ancestors of man found here, this forefather clashes
with surrounding material motion systems-phenomena of nature and humans
in the form of micro particles collisions and the forefather of man dominates who could adapt to this conflict of
the material motion systems-phenomena, in other words he or she
increases the existential interval of values of momentum density,
motion of their material motion system-phenomenon. This extension of
the existential interval of momentum density-movement had the form of the struggle for
self-preservation and the art to survive both the attacks of their
surroundings and natural deteriorated conditions of ice age. It was to widen the
downstream movement from people to their immediate and later
distant
surroundings.
In this sense
each stabilized society is, whether it was the Roman Empire, Egypt and
Greece in ancient times, Christian Europe, the Arab world of the Middle
Ages, or the Soviet Russia and modern superpowers, a material movement system-phenomenon i.e. a
cloud of particles of nonzero mass with the downstream movement,
momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume, with the the
momentum and the wave frequency, which is closer to the maximum momentum density
of
harmonic movement achievable at a given time, but then, when
these had not yet reached the maximum sustainable power, momentum,
virtually maximum downstream movement, power of every man and by them
formed society in a given time, so they disappeared.
For example in
ancient times the period of slavery corresponded with momentum-motion,
power to be at some point of time higher than the momentum of harmonic
motion, power of the human body on the ground, that humanity was
characterized by higher momentum-motion,
power, than it was able to reconcile at the time, or it is concerned
the time of wars, looting and killing of defenseless. During this
period man survived, but they are subject to constant conflicts with
other material motion systems-phenomena, which increase their
momentum-motion, power and they forced them to kill and to take and to
use slaves, who often represented the rapacious neighboring
nations. This material movement system-phenomenon did not allow also at some point of time a sufficient development of science in order to
increase the existential interval of values of momentum density-related
movement, power of the certain empire, and the human him or herself due
to the pressure to be away the maximum sustainable
momentum-harmonic movement, power of man in society at a specific time.
This material
movement system-time, a cloud of particles of the downstream movement,
momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of volume, unfavorable to man
was exposed to the effects of surrounding material motion
systems-phenomena, culture clashes and the pursuit of human to
change the material motion system- the reality on the momentum
density-movement, which would be closer to the maximum downstream
movement, power of the human body at a time.
This clash of
material movement systems of the human body and its surrounding leads
so in the history to the gradual change of momentum-motion,
power of surrounding and momentum-motion, power of man for to him
or
to her more favorable, more harmonized material motion system-fact with
the momentum-motion, power closer to the maximum downstream movement,
power of a man at a time. This adaptation of material movement systems
to the human in their conflict it should lead to the adaptation of the
world to a man or their maximum sustainable momentum-harmonic motion
and vice versa of a man to the world through the growth of existential
interval of values of momentum density-harmonic movement, power, in
which he or she is still able to survive, in other words, the gradual
and maximum sustainable growth of the downstream movement of material
particles. The aim of the history of living organisms is completely to
integrate and master the inanimate nature, every living organism is
driven by subconscious feeling arising from
the general movement and immobility of the micro particles of zero
mass, continuous and uniform movement and immobility of space-time
points, all power, God in my conception, thus instinctive
sense to increase their power in the general movement of particles that
form them, it is to increase their harmonic
movement, momentum and energy. This empowerment
of every living organism is subject to the unification of living
organisms into one being, a legal person who has in the history of
mankind the form of the state, city or family, this
follows from the general movement of particles, when
increasing of momentum of particle or their clusters (motion systems)
it is in the environment possible only to some extent and further
increasing the momentum of particle or their clusters it is only
possible in the still increasing their clusters, i.e. weight. Increasing the society (the material
motion system as well as momentum) of living organisms, i.e.
states, cities, families, etc. it is either objective,
namely sustainable (objective ideal momentum), or subjective, i.e.
short-term (subjective ideal momentum), when these clusters
disintegrate again. It is concerned a
subconscious desire of every living
organism and those communities to increase their power, controlling
people and inanimate nature, i.e. the unification of living and
inanimate nature. This desire is in my opinion, limited and
linked to the kinetic energy of the body (it is an exact level of
needs) in relation to the average values for the whole reality, because in
achieving a boundary in dominating reality
which is different for every living organism, the living
organism feels no internal desire to increasing their motion system of
micro particles. To further increase of this power he or she must be
combined with any other living organism. In case of an objective,
namely sustainable unification of living organisms it will be concerned
mostly peaceful trade with social policy of the state, in the event of
a subjective, i.e., short-term consolidation it will be concerned
mostly the violent unification, colonialism, or the market economy
without adequate social policy, but it still depends on the particular
circumstances and time. Danger threatens to a man in material
movement system-phenomenon with such a different density
momentum-movement, that their clash with material motion system-reality
of contemporary civilization it will mean its extinction and the
development of the world will take a different direction. Increasing of momentum, virtually motion system it will also mean the merging of the maximum
short-term momentum-power, movement and sustainable momentum-power,
movement, of the man and the whole. In
the history of living organisms with an
expanding cluster of living organisms that will unite sustainable, the
knowledge of inanimate nature increases too, i.e. the
level of science of these clusters, which is derived from the
specialization of individuals. When enlarging the society of living
organisms as a genuine and free unanimous legal person it is closer to
the above short-and long-term unification with the surroundings,
because this large society is also becoming
more compassionate.
The war between the people and fight between
all living organisms
in terms of the
general movement of particles are probably perceived as big
change of momentum, the movement in a short time and thus it
is caused by conflict of
material micro particles (i.e., micro particles of non-zero
mass), and material movement systems (i.e., clouds of material
particles
of downstream movement, momentum) with
substantially different average momentum, motion per unit of volume, such
as of a predator and herbivore or as of two states with a difference of
twice of the gross domestic product per capita. Peaceful
trade between people, the friendship between people and animals and
other living organisms probably in
the general movement of particles shows a
small change of momentum, the movement
in a short time and a great change of momentum, the movement in terms
of long time and thus it is caused by small
number of collisions of particles of substantially different average
momentum, movement per unit of
volume as a conflict of imprisoned criminals with the
ordinary citizen through the walls of a prison or two states with a
difference of twice of the gross domestic product per capita, where the
difference are settled by the peaceful trade between countries with
adequate defensive measures for both economies, which are gradually
dismantled, or the large
number of collisions of particles of little different
average momentum, motion per unit of volume as a numerous
trade of the same two wealthy businessmen or a lavish trade between
people of two similar states with a small difference of gross domestic
product per capita.
Evolution
Collisions of
micro particles, of which number is somewhat probably random, which are
forming bodies of macro world, and thus they form the basis of
collisions in our world (in macro world in terms of physics), they are
a matter of chance and probability. Taking only two micro
particles, and after each collision according to de Broglie waves and
Heisenberg uncertainty principle further movement can be determined
only vaguely based on probability, which therefore applies also to
their next collision. By more or
low probable deviation of the various micro particles
from their most probable motion it is secured in nature, that such
collisions have been progressively constrained by mutual interactions
of micro particles, the movement of the micro particles (i.e. energy)
with high probability is ultimately directed to the location of the
micro particles (i.e. energy) of low probability, thereby reducing the
probability of collisions of micro particles in the micro world, and
ultimately of the bodies of macro world (i.e. mechanical basis of evolution). In other words, evolution is directed, in my
opinion, to the termination of collisions and a path to compliance of
everyone and everything.
Collisions of
micro particles of Universe in this way have the form of reasonably
defensive and educational collisions. It does so either because
the initial chaos of the Universe is overcome by the evolution,
possibly also deliberately, when a live specimen gets the
command of his or her imperfect brain, or he or she does not get an
order to avoid a collision. An individual is not able to affect his or
her own imperfect mind without given an order by his or her mind.
Imperfect individual brain can be only improved by the
experience of the individual or other external intervention. This is
so, because both the brain and body are part of the movement of
individual micro particles of Universe, which is random, but the
above-mentioned gradual evolution teaches individuals to improve,
namely to the gradual stopping collisions of micro particles.
Such collisions movement is also the
reason of any crime, an alleged work of the Devil in the
society.
The law of evolution, which reduces gradually
the strength of collisions, and which is therefore a good and
educational, it is a development from less probable to more probable
state of nature.
Evolution of
life in the material world can be likened to a pot full of different
ingredients to cook so long to get food of harmonic taste
and nature. In terms of Philosophy of Balance of the exact
sciences it is concerned the continuous increase of the total momentum of
harmonic movement, power of live material motion systems-world of individuals and them constituent micro
particles in the interest of approximation to
maximum sustained momentum of harmonic movement, power of material
motion systems-phenomena, i.e. clouds of microparticles of positive
weight with a related move, momentum density, i.e. momentum per unit of
volume in terms of law of conservation of momentum with minimal clashes
with other motion systems-effects in terms of lasting. The energy, by
which the live movement systems are constantly increasing their
momentum, it is obtained by increasing level of energy released from nonliving
matter, which thus
represents a sort of flame under a pot mentioned above.
In other words
during the evolution of living organisms they increase their skills and
potential, thus increasing the overall momentum of harmonic movement,
power of their movement system-society and it making micro particles,
while there is increasing in the consistency between living organisms
and inanimate nature, it occurs permanent
fusion of the possible increase in their total momentum of harmonic
movement, power by all living organisms and of the possible short-term
increase in their total momentum of harmonic movement-power of
movement system of micro particles.
Living organism is not acting correctly only subjective but
always also from an objective point of view. Example might
be in eating meat,
when in these living organisms we cannot see the source of food, which
tastes to us but future partners and allies that come eventually to our
evolutionary level. During the evolution of life it is
approaching the overall momentum of harmonic movement, power
of motion systems of micro particles of various life forms,
when the power and ability of more advanced form of life grow more
slowly than the power and ability of backward form of life,
which benefit from contact with more advanced life form, so one can
expect, that their power, thus the total momentum of the harmonic
movement
it equalizes in time. However the condition for survival in this
evolution of advanced life forms is merging the subjective
with the objective ideal momentum-motion, power, i.e. the consistency
of the movement of tangible-material and intangible motion (i.e.
microparticles of zero and by them formed micro- and
macro-particles of nonzero mass) rather than their contradiction and
conflict, because moving closer, of the more backward to advanced forms
of life forms there is threatening a
war of civilizations.
At the same
time such moving closer of the sustained
maximum momentum of harmonic movement, power and the
maximum short-term momentum-motion, power is a continual increase in
the overall momentum of harmonic movement, power of live material
movement systems-individuals through
the constantly improved cognition of inanimate matter.
This gives rise to a constant increase in the overall momentum of
harmonic movement, power of motion systems of life that will not be
destroyed in internecine wars caused by the mutual collisions of the
micro particles. This ensures the existence of all living motion
systems and as well as raising their overall momentum of harmonic
movement, power in time. It
extends also the range of existential interval of motion system-society
of life,
which, thanks to growing the global momentum of harmonic movement
(i.e., no collisions), power is better able to withstand and to adapt
to their nature the particles of surrounding and of other material motion systems-phenomena, with which
they are colliding in time.
This means that
stronger, bigger and
more united civilization withstands better the struggle for life,
which faces, the evolutionary development of life is towards continuous
improvement of these attributes through still better understanding of
matter and its energy, i.e. human possibility with a constant choice
between an improvement and self-destruction.
This
development is also program
for approximation of the world of other living creatures, i.e.
particular animals, insects, plants, fungi and humans, as well as the
approximation of advanced and less advanced e.g. extraterrestrial
civilization.
6th PHILOSOPHY OF CHESS
AND CHECKERS
Definitions and
relations
(performance)
Chess represents the game, where the black and white
figures confront. We
can distinguish according to the Philosophy of Balance the coagency of own figures and other figures
contraagency.
The white figures are the first mover
and they have seemingly an advantage over black figures. However this
formation agency of white figures can
be offset,
if black figures have
the right of last turn in a number
of moves, where turn of white figures is alternated by move of black
figures. The last move is either the black figures victory, the
checkmate by black figures, or draw, whether forever repeating the same
move through three repeated moves or stalemate. In all these cases the
black figures have the last move advantage.
The result is a
series of moves, where only the angle of time view from front, from
behind it determines, who made the first and who last move, or who made
more moves.
In my view, in
chess it is to distinguish two basic situations, where I follow the
Philosophy of Balance. In the first situation the supraagency, a move of
figures is not directed to strengthen their own figures, or a weakening
of foreign figures. It is not an offensive move. This way of the game is
chosen by players who are not used or forced to fight with other
players, which corresponds at best to their nature or otherwise to
their profession or habit.
These
non-aggressive moves dominate in
the first stage of the game, where the
figures are not approached together enough, that they threatened one
another. The figures are developing.
At this stage
of the game I recommend at the supraagency play in accordance with the
Philosophy of Balance to a player to do supraagency moves, i.e. moves
that do not attack the other party or not prepare an attack against it.
It is a kind of waiting moves, which seek the draw ends when both
players dominated their fields of chessboard, but these fields will be
the same or substantially the same or same limited. The result is a
draw.
In practice
these supraagency moves that tend to dominate the same limited field of
chessboard and thus to the draw, in essence to the equal number of
moves, the first is white, the last black, they have the form of facing mirror moves. If
we split the board into four identical square fields a1-d1-a4-d4
(field1), a8-d8-a5-d5 (field 2), e1-e4-h1-h4 (field3), e8-e5-h8-h5
(field4), then the supraagency move means, that, unless an attack from
either side, then move in field 1 of white figures we answer with the
same mirror reverse move in the field4 of black figures. If a
move of white figures is from black to white field, it is
regularly a move of black figures from the black field on a
white field. If the move of white figures from white on a white field,
the move of the black figures is also from white on a white field,
where the move of white figures
from
black on a black
field, it is the move of black figures also from black to black field.
It should be
noted that supraagency moves can be applied only, if the other party is
also doing supraagency non-aggressive moves and games is intended to
draw.
In the case of
the second basic situation, i.e. case
the other party moves offensively in the concept of Philosophy of
Balance in contraagency, which may correspond again to his or her habit
or profession, in the worst case to his or her character, it should
be applied contracontraagency, i.e. defense, which will
regain supraagency game, if we have not taken the defense to
the attack. In other words it should be limited to supraagency or
defensive moves, through which the play will be directed to draw again.
During the
attack, i.e. the contraagency of one party it occurs
violation
of supraagency equilibrium sought to the present moment. If properly
maintained and well-led attack and defense it is supraagency play, i.e. draw once again. In other words the each offensive move of the opponent must be
answered by an appropriate defensive move.
But for the
attacking side from a psychological point of view in the case of the above mentioned defects of
character
there
is superiority
complex, if he or she wants to defeat the opponent, to
humble him or her. If this complex does not arise in the other side,
virtually his or her inferiority complex, fear of attack does not
arise, the other side can punish this complex by its dominance in the
game and to defeat the opponent in the final result.
Condition is,
that the opponent is taken psychologically by the defending party as him- or herself, namely
as a man with him or her, he or she wants from long-term to end with
balance score, i.e. in supraagency.
In the absence
of superiority complex, i.e. character defect in the
attacking opponent and the restriction to a simple defensive
moves for the defending opponent, then supraagency moves, in other
words the attack in the form
of offensive moves, which is always answered by the right defensive
move, it always terminates with time.
In the case of
superiority complex of attacking player the defending opponent
has possibility to use
the errors and thus to punish opponent’s non-supraagency
behavior, who rejected implicitly offered
balanced game. The punishment is inevitable, because, if
this contraagency did not come, then the
attacking opponent would not understand, that it is incorrect
to want to beat their neighbor and thereby to degrade them, which
causes their desire for revenge, virtually in chess for the next game.
On the contrary
the humiliation of those who promoted the attack over you against
supraagency game, it contributes to supraagency or balanced
acting of the next games. There will
thus be reducing the error, virtually sense of superiority of rival.
In the case of
punishment of mistake of attacking opponent it is not possible to have our own sense of
superiority, namely the own contra (supra)
agency behavior, but again it needs to play in supraagency in the long
term balanced behavior. Otherwise the same psychological mistake could
repeat as a previous attack of the other opponent in the opposite
effect.
It should also
be noted, that game without
a sense of superiority or humiliation according to the situation on the
board we can begin to apply at any stage of the game.
And as such it can always improve your disadvantage
position or loss. Even if your previous character
mistakes will
bring you to lose in checkmate, i.e. to offset your contraagency moves
through recontracontraagency or the punishment as final completion,
virtually enforcement of supraagency.
Using the
classical terminology, it is concerned in the above-mentioned
concept the flawless character of the player in the long term,
always for
supraagency and contraagency play the concept of game as draw.
Similarly you
can play Checkers, when
we play from the beginning in
supraagency and we avoid the threat to the
opponent's figures by their graduated pushing forward in the
ranks in the mirror
way as long as possible and for
the aggressive move
in the form of non-mirror and non-gradual eject of opponent figures we answer with defense move
from our side.
7th PHILOSOPHY OF ECONOMICS
Economics in terms of Philosophy of Balance
In terms of
Philosophy of Balance of exact
science the economics is one of many social
means to create a single legal person, based on unanimous, real and
free consent of all the organisms that dominate all inanimate nature.
This is an expansion of material movement system of individual man and
society, i.e. a cloud of material particles of nonzero mass with the
downstream movement aimed at creating a single movement system covering
each and all that is the one downstream movement of everything
and everyone.
Following
movement means ideally, that organisms will
move without losing energy, no collision with other tangible non-zero
mass particles and their energy will therefore be sustained, they will
live forever. However throughout history there is a widening
of motion system of each body and all organisms
simultaneously, thus enlarging the energy, which those systems
contain.
The needs of the individual organism are the primary driver
of the economy, i.e. a range of movement system, that single organism
composed of energy from living and inanimate nature, which has this
organism, it is a subconscious desire of the need to control. Individual needs of the organism appears to be
related to their momentum (or kinetic energy, which can be, in my view,
derived from the momentum), that increasing the motion system, thus a
downstream movement of the organism and its surrounding the kinetic
energy of the individual organism was continuous with kinetic energy of
motion field, in which the organism exists (local movement field). This
is related to collisions of material particles of nonzero mass inside
and outside of the local motion field that transmit
momentum, motion, and thus it leads to expansion of the average values
of momentum, the movement of material particles and it is raising the
balance of local movement field.
These needs of the organism given by the
kinetic energy of the movement system they are different
for different organisms depending on their kinetic energy,
thus a body that is more energetic (with more kinetic energy),
it has a need for greater mastery of inanimate and living nature, to
create greater movement system, which controls, formed by the cloud of
material particles of downstream movement. It should make a
greater movement system for connecting, relating the kinetic
energy of this more energic, vital organism with the
environment.
These needs of the body are the reason of enlarging
the world-movement system of the organism, namely the downstream
movement, which serves to him or her, which he or she controls. These
needs include both essential needs and other cultural needs of the
organism. Because of these needs of individual organisms those
organisms are directed to continuously expansion
of controlled inanimate and living nature. Hence the scarce resources of the organism are enlarging,
which is the second component of economic scarcity in addition to
utility, which is related to the needs of the organism.
As to the man
himself or herself the conclusion is, that there are individuals with
larger and smaller needs, while to meet the
needs of a person it is
sufficient present mastery
of inanimate and living nature, but to
meet the needs of another person the new and new horizons,
space travels, nuclear testing, the formation of larger companies, etc.
should be cotrolled.
In addition to
the needs of the individual organism there are the perceived needs of
the individual organism as needs of the whole
society, here a single body feels the need of society omnipotence in
terms of controlling inanimate nature, and of unanimous, genuine and
free consent of all the society of living organisms on all solved issues. This
consistency implies from a subconscious sense
of belonging together of each and all that derived from the world of
all points of space-time, which is also harmonic, consistent
and continuous, the space-time points do not collide, only touch and
they fill our whole space. These points of space-time create
simultaneously our material world and their movement and appearance are
the causes and they determine the movement and appearance of the world
of material particles, the world of man, virtually of all organisms and
inanimate nature. This desire of the individual for omnipotence
of society it is desire for a world without death and pain,
where you can revive the dead and heal any injury or illness.
By the
above-reasoned unconscious needs of the
individual it can be explained the basic economic supply curve
and demand curve. Supply curve means, that with the price our
offer also increases, the demand curve means, that with the
price demand also drops, where the curves intersect, there is
an equilibrium price, where supply meets the demand. An individual with
the great needs to control live and dead nature is an
individual with high kinetic energy, who needs to relate his or her
kinetic energy with a value of surrounding to form a grand movement
system, namely to control more of the living and inanimate nature with
less kinetic energy, which connects the movement of the individual and
surrounding. The more are the people's needs satisfied, then
the greater is the movement system and the more coherent is its kinetic
energy and kinetic energy around, the
slower is his or her motion system to expand, namely the
downstream movement through a particles collisions. Hence,
in the language of economic theory the marginal utility is declining,
that with the greater satisfaction of human needs, his o her
satisfaction decreases, if the
quantity of consumed goods-energy, movement increases about unit. From
the marginal utility the economic theory derives the
demand curve. Regarding the supply curve so
with growth of price is increasing supply or there is growing needs
satisfaction of the individual through that price and this
growing satisfaction of needs is forcing them to increase their
activities in order to increase the satisfaction of their needs, namely
to increase the supply to meet their increased demand. In
other words, the high kinetic energy causes the individual's greater
mobility, virtually activities aimed to increase the movement system
through the collision of material (a non-zero mass) particles, the more energetic is an
individual the more extensive is his or her work in order to
meet his or her increased demands. With the growing satisfaction of his
or her needs will decrease the activity caused by unmet needs.
In other words,
in terms of man is essential objective of the
economy:
1.) Reducing energy losses due to collisions of
material particles of non-zero mass, i.e. disputes in society of
organisms and inanimate natural disasters in the form of
widening the movement system as a downstream movement of a person again.
2.) Enlarging energy, virtually motion
economic resources of the man and society by reason of the
above needs in the form of widening the movement system as a
downstream movement of society and inanimate nature
These
objectives of economics can be summarized as expansion
of the downstream movement of each and everything to its perfection.
ad.1)
The aim of each society as a local movement
system, a cloud of material particles of nonzero mass
and downstream movement is to preserve
itself. So the formation
of such society system as a local movement system, which will provide continuity of all its parts,
virtually members. This means the composition of the local
motion systems of individuals, individual organisms, that their
movement followed and it was thereby creating and maintaining the
existence of a single global movement system throughout the
whole society with continuous movement.
In other words
we need a society that allows the existence of all its members with
different needs, as I said above, while maintaining the society. The society has to permit within it the existence
of members with the great needs, a large kinetic energy, that
require for their existence a large movement system, i.e. they want to
control a large part of living and inanimate nature, and
members with small needs, a low kinetic energy, that require
for their existence a little movement system or even require a large
movement system, which would offset their disability, it is sufficient
for them to control only a small part of the living and inanimate
nature, or they need the assistance of other members of
society. The society's compliance is to achieve primarily by unanimous, real and free agreement of all its
members, all living organisms, where these organisms, virtually people
know best about their large or small needs corresponding to
their kinetic energy. The means of this
agreement is the free market, consisting of a number of
economic relations based on agreement of its members.
When it is not possible to reach this agreement, a State enters
into the area with its forcing, a State should decide on the basis of
the alternative principle
of majority in order to create harmonic movement of
each and all, the only one and
inclusive harmonic
society. The State should protect the freedom
of all market participants that the stronger market participant could
not do another than educational and defensive pressure to the
property weaker market party, it should limit the market to prevent monopolies, oligopolies
and cartels, where are below the maximum profit and thus they are not
forced by the nature of production or services, and, where they are
necessary, it should regulate their behavior to avoid abuse of their
position.
For condition of compliance of society as a
function of market to be achieved
in particular by unanimous, real and free consent of all its members,
all living organisms, they are responsible the
principles of protection of liberty and life of all living organisms,
the protection of intangible and tangible assets of these organisms,
that they may be freely handled
only by these organisms in maintaining the rights of all other living
organisms. Therefore it must be substantially left
to the will of every organism to what extent he or she wants to leave
their property or its part because of their limited needs to another
member or members of the community with greater needs. State may intervene into the free will of
individuals by the appropriate social non-benefit forced transfers
without consideration only if it
is concerned the State investment with a maximum gain, e.g. with long
pay back periods (e.g. charity) or a very large State investment, which
is not capable to carry out the private sector and
it is not possible to finance these investments on the basis of the
agreement. As the rule is to be left to the owner to persuade him or
her through the free exchange of views in society about the need of
social transfers for conservation and development of society.
ad. 2)
The second function of the free market, except towards
the harmonic society arrangement through unanimous, real and free
agreement of all its members, all living organisms,
it is the increase of society and its resources in
the form of movement system expansion of the society. For contracts
representing this feature of market within it concluded there
should be in the market enough free
space for members of society with greater needs, therefore, urged by
the subconscious desire to expand their power, resources, virtually
movement system with the downstream movement. In other words members of
society, whose needs are greater than by them already
met needs within the society, they should be directed by market
to an increase
in resources of society, and not merely to redistribution of resources
within society, namely the theft of third party sources to meet the
third party needs.
To condition of
expansion of society and their resources in terms of expansion of
movement system, namely the downstream movement of this society as a
function of the market they correspond
sufficient freedom and opportunities for members of the society urged
by greater needs than met within the society to expand their sources,
virtually their movement system of downstream movement, but with the
present increase in resources across the society virtually expansion of
the society, its movement system of downstream movement. This
corresponds what widest possible
access to education, what simplest
conditions for business, relation
of science with education, and the
simplest possibility to associate members of the community for business
purposes, the most transparent and
simple system of financing from the money of investors. Business of State should be
limited to those necessary areas, where it is
not possible business of non-governmental sector due to the massive
cost of the undertaking or due to the risk of return such as education,
defense contracts, health, science, etc.
At the same
time it should be noted, that business of people
with great needs in the environment, where they have no
opportunities to meet these needs, it often leads to merely
enlargement of their immature movement system (forcibly
associated societies), virtually property or
power at the expense of other members of society, it is not the
increase of wealth of society, but its reallocation to the hands of
leading individuals with great needs. This allocation is now
an obvious part of the behavior of most successful entrepreneurs. Since
the above-mentioned second condition of the market is to widen the
wealth of the individual and society while not to spread the wealth of
individuals at the expense of other subjects it needs, that society reacts in material breach of this
principle, which goes beyond the socially acceptable
way of doing business, with that in the ideal society the
selfish redistribution of property and power it will not even exist on
the basis of coercion, but on the basis of free will of members of the
society. Therefore, when a major violation of this principle the punishment should come that
should be primarily educational, in the second course defensive.
Since the motive of the perpetrators of property crimes are usually the
above needs of a large property and power, but they have also the
unconscious desire to reach this property. When these people
will be moved by market pressures in the
right direction, namely the enlargement of their wealth, while the
society's fortune, so it must always pay off to the society and the victims.
Expansion of
resources of society in the form of expansion of its wealth while the
wealth of individuals correspond to investment
planning and redistributive function of the market in relation to the resources
of the society, this function of business in relation to
social resources performs both the individual
in his or her business, and the State in its above-mentioned business.
Non-negligible function in the investment
planning and allocation of resources the money plays, which
represent a kind of State shares, the percentage of social property.
In the event, that the society's assets grow, the price of
money is increasing, the currency of the
State revalues, where the society's assets decline, are
consumed, the price of money is decreasing,
devaluing the currency of the State.
The State should maintain enough money in circulation, that the prices were stable, therefore, to enable planning
and investment of the market, regardless of currency risks, a
devaluation of money. The devaluation of
money is the redistribution of assets in societies without growth of
wealth and it is thus inconsistent with the protection of
property rights and it is often the way that members with the higher
needs to meet them without a real increase in wealth of
society, where is such a market failure in the focus of people with
great needs for increases in wealth of society, instead, of
which there is a theft of property through its
just internal redistribution.
The cause of business cycles in the economy,
such as crises, depression, recovery and boom in the market economy is,
in my view, the failure of redistributive investment and planning
function of the market, i.e. market
participants and the State expect big profits from the business with
great economic growth, therefore they invest (lend) and spend, when
those profits do nothing, then it leads to bankruptcies and economic
crisis, when investors are overly cautious on the contrary, not
investing, not spending money, it leads to economic decline,
the situation stabilizes, then again investors are beginning to invest
more and it leads to slow economic growth to occur again the excessive
optimism of investors, entrepreneurs and the State, excessive,
irreversible investment and the whole situation is repeated. Here the
basic mistake is incorrect planning of economic development and
redistribution of economic goods by investors and
entrepreneurs, if they correctly estimated
using the market mechanism development of the economy, the continuous
economic growth without inflation would be in my view.
Therefore in terms of investment (loans) they
should apply the maximum transparency, maximum possible control by
investors (creditors), environment of non-corruption, that
distorts information, and creditors must also consider the compulsory
insurance of large investments, etc.
Expanding
sources of society in the form of expansion of its motion system, a cloud of material
particles with nonzero mass of the downstream movement it corresponds
to international economic cooperation to be
directed to the above single legal entity consisting of each and
everything, the only will constituted by the general consensus
of the actual and the free consent of all its members and controlling
all inanimate nature. In terms of Philosophy of Balance of
the exact sciences it is a unification of the two motion systems of
different or the same density of kinetic energy. From the physical
point of view, this unification can take place quickly, if the two
motion systems have identical or similar kinetic energy density, which
causes small but numerous collisions of material particles, albeit
slowly in two material systems of a large difference in the density of
kinetic energy, it will cause big collisions of material particles but
a small number of such collisions in a short time. In other words two States, virtually two economies with different
wealth (energy, virtually movement) per capita they should use
for mutual trade protectionist measures that limit the large number of
business relationships in a short time, aimed at dominating
the weaker economy by a stronger economy, until through the
use of the comparative advantages of both economies their economic levels will move towards. With increasing proximity of
wealth per capita of the two economies a gradual removal of
protectionist measures should be. These
protectionist measures will not be needed in the relationship between
two equally rich economies per capita.
Finally I would
like to express to the problem of surplus of labor of man in the company, which is reportedly appropriated by
businessman for him or her. This issue is related to the
issue of a man with higher levels of needs again, which did drive them to the widening the
movement system, thus controlling living and inanimate nature. If this
increase in the motion system of a person while increasing the movement
system of the entire society, or increase of the wealth of one man is
increasing the wealth of society
at
the same time, not the mere redistribution (theft) within the society,
then people, involved in the movement system of the downstream
movement, joint activities achieve higher total wealth, greater use of
their kinetic energy than, if each worked independently. The reason for
this surplus is that through better use of the kinetic energy of
individuals, there is a continual widening of the downstream movement
of the movement system through the collision with the surrounding
tangible-material particles (a non-zero mass) and motion systems, and
through connecting their movements. In other words, specialization
of people within the company of the energetic entrepreneurs it enables to grow
progressively through further connection of
the surrounding reality to this company. However,
it is important, that this was a continuing movement, it is the free and actual current or future
approval of all members of the company with their membership in this
business, virtually company, not non-educational forcible unification
of its members not satisfying their real needs, which means an increase
of number of collisions of material particles,
virtually the disputes
of its members in terms of longer time, or its termination in
this time.
Distribution of surplus among members
of society should ideally correspond with
their merits to gain business, which in my opinion
corresponds in the ideal company to their needs, virtually within the
enterprise to the profitable use of their kinetic energy, which makes them
according
to their size for greater or lesser activity (see above). In terms of
motion of physical particles of nonzero mass and the
development of movement system of the downstream movement it
is to ensure, that people and other organisms and inanimate nature
create a movement system of continuous movement, it is only one
really consistent and free society through their conflict,
therefore it should decide about the
distribution of profits from their joint business especially
their current agreement, in the absence of agreement
a State must decide through the educational forcing according to their current and future merits
for profit, thus it is concerned today the planned agreement in the
future (see ad.1)).
The
equitable distribution of wealth
Our real
personal material needs are related to the fact, that we are more or
less energetic living creatures, in my opinion energetic living
creatures have more real personal material needs, in my opinion the
less energetic living creatures have lower real personal material
needs. In my view energy, power of the individual is, given by the
internal body kinetic energy of healthy living creatures unaffected by
diseases of the body, not by the internal body potential kinetic energy
of living creatures consisting of other types of energy that can be
potentially transformed into the kinetic body energy. They are
particularly the body fat stores, it is not correct, that the fatter is
living creature, the more vital, energetic is living creature,
with more kinetic energy contained in a sound body. The size of personal tangible-material needs of living creatures is also given by the body
kinetic energy contained within a healthy body i.e. movement of
individuals on the ground, that the increased kinetic energy within the
body of a healthy individual or the movement is often outwardly
manifested as increased external body movement, which requires more
material resources, the space (there is a balancing the
internal movement of the healthy body with the surrounding of
living creature body) and while this increased kinetic energy contained
within the body of a healthy individual it is created by an increased
amount of conversion of other energy sources outside the body (obtained
in particular by digestion of food and fluids). In
other words, in my view the ratio of personal tangible needs of living
creatures is to determine from the relative amount of kinetic energy
contained within their
healthy bodies (not
overweight etc.).
Kinetic theory
of substance is the theory that connects the observed macroscopic state
of the substance with the microscopic motion of particles, from which
the substance is made. According to this theory for the motion of each
particle a kinetic energy corresponds to the temperature of the
substance. The change of kinetic energy of particles of substance,
which we perform through addition or removal of heat, it is
macroscopically reflected as changes in temperature of the substance.
This theory is best developed for an ideal gas, usually talking about
so-called kinetic theory of gases. In my view
consequently, if we find a healthy body temperature of (not overweight
etc.) living creature in peace under certain external conditions and if
we compare it with a healthy body temperature of another living
creature in peace under the same external conditions, we can measure
and compare their internal body kinetic energy as well as their
personal material needs. While a healthy body I do not
consider the body of individuals overweight, but with a
natural healthy weight.
In my view
similarly the personal material needs of the individual will be compared, if we compare amount
of energy from food and liquids to be consumed by the individual at
rest under certain external conditions, without causing deposition in
body fat reserves, virtually fat cells, and it is fully converted into
kinetic energy within his or her healthy body (not overweight
etc..), virtually into this internal body movement. Then
we compare the amount of energy of food and fluids, virtually from them
converted kinetic energy observed under the same external
conditions for different subjects at rest.
Thus found ratio value of personal physical needs of
all individuals equal to the value of the internal body kinetic energy
of the healthy subjects at rest under the same external conditions
it can be used in economics. In the
calculation of demand curves as well as supply curves of various
economic goods. On the personal as well as groups material needs are
based not only the demand curve, but in my opinion the supply curve.
Regarding the supply curve with growth of price the supply is
increasing, or it is increasing the satisfaction of personal and group
material needs of offering individual through this price, and
large unmet personal as well as group needs make them in an
ideal case to increase their economic activity to increase the supply
to meet their higher unmet personal but also collective material needs,
hence greater economic demand. On the personal material needs the social benefits should be also based in the case of
non-benefit transfers of economic goods. But on the personal needs of
individuals and groups in society the social
peace depends also, above-average energetic individuals with
larger personal and but also group tangible-material needs are then forced, albeit with greater
risk, to acquire property, and so through legal, and if they cannot do
this, even illegal ways. Therefore a society, that does not allow those
above-average energetic individuals with great personal and
group tangible-material needs legally to acquire property, it
is threatened by various forms of theft of property disputes,
revolutions and wars.
For personal material needs of the individual
I consider the ratio value of personal needs of the individual equal to
the value of the internal body kinetic energy of healthy subjects at
rest under certain external conditions. For group
material needs of the individual I consider the sum of values
of this quantity for all people in the group, for which satisfaction of
their needs this individual takes responsibility.
In the past in
the economic philosophy two basic concepts clashed-Marxist
economics, which in an ideal communist State want to
distribute economic goods substantially
by physical-material needs and capitalist
concept wishing to distribute
economic goods on principle of merits in terms of a market price.
Neither one of these conflicting concepts cannot be applied absolutely.
In my
opinion the objective of the ideal
State or the ideal economy as the means of equitable
distribution of economic goods, virtually of ideal or natural law as
a social or the legal relationship to be closer to the private law it
is the law, where the sole role of the agreement of equal entities. In
my opinion the ideal State is so consistent to the social contract as a
private institute, which provides for resolving all social relations in
the ideal society on the basis of free and
genuine agreement of all interested legal entities. However
such a uniform and free will is in a real State unattainable ideal,
which we can approach in fact.
From the
foregoing, that the merit, virtually earned
profit in the sense of capitalist concept I understand reducing the
overall power of conflicts, crashes in society, thus increase of its
compliance, which, even if the
growth of the economic product without
external (external) costs, means in particular
growth
of a quantity of economic goods that are more probably to meet the
material needs of members of society, thus also it may decrease
litigations in society. This is also closer to the above-agreed ideal
State. Unearned income increases the overall
strength of collisions.
Social
controversial of the above absolute application of capitalist and
Marxist concepts of economics does not take effect if the
member has the same material needs and
merits, then their material needs can be always met by their
merits. However this controversial
shows in the case, that this individual has
more material needs than merits, then it can be expected
differences in society between those society and individual who seeks
to satisfy the material needs at any cost that is growing disputes
within the society (essentially through illegal undeserved profit). In
this case the solution is not, when the society meets the material
needs of the individual, because this individual is not still able to
use his or her kinetic energy to earn income or to reduce the overall
power of conflicts in society, and he or she increases through the use
of donated economic goods the level of disputes in society. An
example is a gift of money to developing countries, for which they buy
weapons and they start a civil war, or a gift of money to a gambler, it
is inserted into a slot machine to deepen his or her reliance on the
slot machines. This controversial case shows also, when material needs of individual are lower than the
merits, when the individual accumulates pointless wealth and
he or she cannot invest it properly, because he or she does not see
into the soul of other people, or he or she does not know
their material needs.
How then to
satisfy material needs of individuals in society who do not deserve it,
or how to take property from individuals who deserve it, but they do
not need it. The answer is, that it always must be concerned the investment strategy, when we expect the earned
profit from the investment of economic goods in favor of
satisfying material needs of the individual who is not able yet to use
their kinetic energy, which in my view is an exact expression of his or
her physical- material needs to achieve a deserved profit, thus
reducing overall power of conflicts in society. At a time
when an individual's ability to use their kinetic energy for the merits
is increasing, such an investor will reach also deserved
profit. In other words, when one reaches the ability to use their
kinetic energy to achieve the above-deserved profit, the whole
society gains in the form of taxes etc. In the case of an assessment of
different investment opportunities it should be decided on the basis of
the achievement of earned bigger profit. This includes the case, that
the thing of the investor someone needs more than the investor he or
she is willing to pay more for it, then that other person is also able such payment
now
or in the future with interests to repay and the investor is not
allowed to use their investment for material needs.
In my opinion the maximum earned profit of educational investment
can be achieved at an individual group of
individuals, for which it is the minimum value of the earned assets (or
profit) per Joule of their internal body kinetic energy in
the case of healthy individuals or individuals at rest under the same
external conditions (see above
rate
value of needs of the
individual). The period of return of
educational investment (see below business, barter or
charitable investment) increases then with
increasing value of non-earned property (see above
unearned income, unearned income includes also debts of individuals or
group) per one Joule of their internal body
kinetic energy in the case of healthy individuals or
individuals at rest under the same external conditions (see above the
rate value
of
needs of the individual). In other
words, it is necessary gradually increasing the amount of investment
funds in individuals who have the greatest unmet needs, making them to
the highest economic activity (i.e., economic supply), while these
individuals acquire the least amount of money to satisfy their unmet
needs in different forms of theft of property (i.e. in the form of
unearned income, collisions). As to me finding
such an ideal investment opportunities,
virtually individual or group it is essential a matter of a free
market, because only from the long experience of
potential investors we can know whether a given individual or group
have a large unmet needs accompanied by a small undeserved (essentially
illegal) profit.
How we can guide an energetic individual to the
achievement of merits, virtually economic well-deserved profit. In the beginning such an individual is not able in principle to
use his or her kinetic energy without avoiding
clashes within the society, namely the loss of merits in the above
sense. To learn imperfect individuals without
loss, i.e. collisions, to make full use of his or her kinetic energy,
it can only be through the properly selected education. As
I'm an optimist, I believe, that nature is
designed to reduce collisions at the
society, and then this is such a kind of education for all
living individuals by nature itself. Such education should be performed well by all individuals.
Individual should invest his or her energy to
the education of other individuals, only if he or she expects to
achieve the maximum profit earned from such investments.
The difference
between the defense and education is, that we expect economic return of
invested assets, namely energy. In the case
of defense we expect a soon return, for education we are willing to
wait longer, because I am optimistic, as I
said earlier, I believe, that correctly invested economic goods return
always to individual. Greater number of small
collisions instead of one large represents an educational
investment in overly energetic individual.
We can say,
that individuals who have more merits than personal material needs,
they choose the longer merit (i.e. essentially legal) investments,
mostly earning bigger profit and a lot of risky, i.e. long-term
education, therefore they are content with very long-term
economic return of goods, because they do not need to meet their
personal physical-material needs (that focuses on charity).
Individuals, who have a balanced personal material needs and merits,
they elect as rule short meritorious (i.e. essentially legal)
investment, mostly deservedly less profitable and less risky, i.e.
short-term education, or they want a quick return of invested economic
goods to satisfy their personal material needs (these are usually businesses from hand to hand).
Individuals, who have more personal material needs than merits they
choose a middle time merit (i.e. essentially legal) investments, it is
a compromise between the earned profit and risk between long and
short-term education, because invested assets, including the economic
well-deserved also undeserved (essentially illegal) income they require
necessarily to meet their personal physical-material needs (it is concerned particularly a businessman). Repayment
of funds invested by the debtor is again charity, business or exchange
investment
In the case of
groups of individuals we must always care, that the
agreed needs can be met from the earned income of
the group during the lifetime of the group, that the group
of individuals has not changed from a largely educational (i.e. agreed)
company to company attacking each other and defending subjects (see the
concepts of education and defense presented above).
For attack of individual especially, when
his or her material needs are greater than his or her merits, who takes another individual against his or her will
the deserved economic goods (energy), even greater than their
material needs, the attacker should pay
the full damages minus by the offender reasonably expected long-term or
short-term investment of economic goods (see above education or defense).
Reasonably expected economic investment of goods (energy) means that an
attacker or a group that took responsibility for payment of damages,
they are for it able to achieve the maximum
earned (i.e. essentially legal) profit (see above). These are
by the individuals or groups effectively
enforced investment.
Bad investments are necessary gradually to be
forgiven. If you cannot achieve the return of investment,
it is not through such bad investment recovery to increase earned
income of the creditor, such recovery of bad investment often increases
rather than decreases the overall strength of collisions in the society, so in this case it is necessary
to choose education, virtually charitable investment to debtor and the
debt gradually to forgive him or her within improving the use
of his or her kinetic energy to achieve the deserved profit.
In the case of
an assessment, whether the assets exceeds the material needs of
individual, or how much are unsatisfied material needs of individuals,
this is matter of emotion, experience and
experiment, or reason in the described case of an exact measurement of
physical-material needs according to ratio value of kinetic
energy contained within their healthy body (not overweight etc.).This brings in fact us to the edge of the general
speculative philosophy not based on an exact measurement of physical
needs.
Future maximum
unearned and earned income can also be determined only as a probable
maximum profit because the future development of the facts is
essentially the movement of micro particles, which is random. (The
position of the micro particles and its momentum cannot be determined
by microscopic physics with absolute precision using de Broglie waves
and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle we can only determine
the probability, with which the micro particles will be located in a
certain place of space.) More precise
determination of probability of earned income, thus reducing
the overall strength of collisions at the society it could be achieved
only through perfect model of nature, that it cannot provide us a
single individual's brain, though no matter how ingenious, but only cooperation of brains of all living individuals,
which each contains a small model of nature.
Literature:
1) The
Philosophy of Balance, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., http://www.sweb.cz/filosofierovnovahy
2nd) Wikipedia,
the free Internet encyclopedia, http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetick%
C3% A1_teorie_l% C3% A1tek
The causes of economic
cycles, wars, and their solutions
Current economy is based on the loan for future economic
growth, which is provided by banks and it is paid from the real
economic growth. This means, that banks lend to advance
economic growth in a particular individual, company, State or
international community with the agreed interest rate. Three ways can
occur, either the growth of the economic entity is more than the agreed
interest rate, then the economic entity is in profit, or this
economic growth is equal to the interest rate, then the economic entity
has no gain or loss, or the growth of the economic entity is
less than the agreed interest rate, it is concerned the economic
crisis, virtually economic recession of this subject. Therefore, it would also be provided, that
financial loans should always be sufficiently lower than projected
economic growth of the economic entity.
From the foregoing, that current economy is
based on the philosophy of sustainable economic growth, from
which loans for this
economic growth are paid, which
is in conflict with the reality of
capitalist economy, where economic cycles of
recession, crisis, recovery, boom are alternating. Then there is in fact
repeatedly a slow down or drop, deep slump, slow growth and a
more sharp increase in economic product. At present, the world,
virtually Czech economy is in recession phase or the crisis, when it
is over crediting to individuals,
private companies, States and the international community, which are
not, or in the future will not be able to pay loans on real economic
growth. Thus there was incorrect estimated future economic growth and
consequently the lenders incorrect granted loans, which resulted in a
global credit crisis.
As I stated earlier, I
think, that the world is not controlled by the money, capital
and multinational corporations, powerful States or exceptional people,
etc., but by living cells and other living organisms, which
themselves can influence, what every person, animal, insect, fungus,
plant or other living creature, think and do. Only living cells-e.g.
neurons in the brain affect, what one thinks, a man is irrelevant, how
these neurons in the brain interconnect.
Every living cell, from which
is composed every living creature and man has three
basic needs: 1) to receive vital substance, 2) to move and in
my opinion third yet not meant basic need of all living cells
is 3) the need for health and life in peace
without be eaten or attacked by other living cells, bacteria
or viruses, or non-living things, which can hurt a living
creature.
Economic growth
is then characterized by increasing production of goods, i.e.
especially cadavers of living creatures that meet human needs. However,
because each person consists of living cells, also needs
of every righteous man as an organism are built on the basis of limited
material needs of living cells of these righteous subjects. Therefore
every righteous man needs to ensure 1) the supply of vital substances
and 2) sufficient movement and 3) life in good health and peace. Fair human
society must strike at some point of economic growth on the ceiling
formed by the aforementioned limited tangible-material needs of each
fair economically active person, virtually of living cells forming the
organism and he or she must begin to meet the material needs of other
people etc., and of other living organisms.
Unfair
individuals, who achieve satisfaction of their needs by unnecessary
killing of the enemy, virtually other people, animals, insects, plants,
fungi, living cells, bacteria and viruses they are (or them forming
living cells) in fear from the future, and therefore they accumulate
unnecessary material stocks (houses, land,
consumer goods, money, etc.), which serve to satisfy material needs of
no individuals. This leads to conflicts among
individuals with each other and with
nature during the accumulation of material stocks, of
which resources are limited. In the worst case, permanent disruption of
natural ecological balance and apocalypse may also occur. Fear from the future forces also people to
stop buying consumer goods in the event, that during the
accumulation of stocks because of this fear of subjects the marginal
utility of the saved crown exceeds for the greater part of people
the marginal utility of the crown spent on consumer goods. Economic
growth stops and at the same time the capitalist economy
based on continuous economic growth (see above)
begins also to collapse.
What are the solutions, that the critical potential consumers are
scared and they do not want to buy, which are accompanied by high
inflation of money perhaps subsequently by State monetary reform? There
are short term and long-term solutions. The
short-term solutions include armaments
and subsequent war, when it is caused the
threat of war and the need for new weapons, such wartime
needs and their satisfaction through the production of war goods
represent an extension of economic growth, the follow-war means a
significant loss and consequent lack of the necessary material needs of
the economically active population of the State, which again
bases future unmet necessary needs of economically active population of
the State and consequently, economic growth-boom (economic
cycle may be repeated). Another similar
short-term solution is a strong economic crisis, which also
causes loss and subsequent lack of the necessary material needs of the
economically capable population, hunger and subsequent re-establishment
of future unmet necessary material needs of economically
active population of the State and consequently, economic growth-boom
(economic cycle may be repeated). With strong
economic crisis they threaten the war sentiment in the society
hit by the crisis, armaments and the emergence of war.
Furthermore there is also long-term
solution, which is not based on a continually
repeated short-term enrichment and the subsequent war of impoverished
economically active population of a country that is based on continuous
economic growth, i.e. on the ever-increasing needs satisfaction of the
economically active population. As
to me solution of this economic crisis is to meet the above third need of living organisms,
i.e. a life of person, virtually of cells in health and peace
not based on hostility to other living organisms (i.e.
people, animals, insects, plants, fungi, living cells, bacteria or
viruses) by their killing or the indifference of
humans to their death, but on the satisfaction of their
needs. Capitalist society should promote instead of a limited
individual selfish gains in its philosophy and ideology to
meet this third need of living organisms, i.e. their life in
good health and peace, which would be based on meeting the needs of the
hungry and suffering people, animals, insects and plants, fungi and
other living organisms, which are practically infinite, they
have not their ceiling and thus to ensure the required sustainable
economic growth. In other words the economically advanced
western society must be learned,
virtually motivated for example through advertising such as television,
to meet their needs it was not seen only in individual income, but also
in satisfaction of the needs of other poor and suffering
people, e.g. in the developing world, or some collapsing
Eastern
European economies, virtually other living creatures such as animals,
namely in the altruistic gains. Needs of the poor and suffering are essentially infinite, their satisfaction will
require constant increasing production of goods, virtually values for
their satisfaction and it will cause the continuous economic growth.
As to me the west people, virtually
crucial part of western consumers did not loose purchasing power
(deposits in banks are still at high level), but they do not want to
buy, because they are afraid of the future. It is not, therefore, why
produce more, to whom one should satisfy the greater
needs, economic growth came across its ceiling.
Unless economic growth the loans will
not be repaid and banks will not be able to meet their
obligations. The economic growth
would be possible only by satisfying the needs of the poor and
suffering individuals who presently have neither the intellect
nor the money, whose needs are inexhaustible. However these needs,
which are also the needs of wealthy Western people, somehow the Western
people do not see these needs today, the ruling people's sense is today selfish
benefit, and the ferocity of the jungle by a password
you will eat or you will be eaten, kill or you will be killed, or beat
or you will be beaten, damage or you will be damaged, etc. The
fact, that the good is good in the jungle only for delusion of the
masses and for the own enrichment or to enrich a tiny group of
criminals at the expense of the cheated.
Preserving today's society without economic
growth it would be very limited movement of any asset in society, young
people might not get rich etc. In
the absence of economic growth they would be richer only with different
kinds of theft of property.
In my opinion the great encourage of economic
growth in the Western in past it has been the EU enlargement of
countries with a high level of unmet needs.
Literature:
http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1048 : Příčiny ekonomických cyklů, válek a jejich řešení, http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1090 :
Příčiny ekonomické krize z hlediska ivých buněk
8th
PHILOSOPHY OF CONCLUSION OR THE CONCLUSION
In
my Philosophy of Balance (see all above) I tried to create a generic
model, virtually picture of reality, this image will never be accurate,
because it is a philosophy, a general model of reality rather than a
precise description. In my view at the same time the mass, virtually
reality is infinitely divisible (they are concerned space-time
points, i.e. points of Euclidean space at all times), in my opinion
so knowledge of this reality is for man or other living organism an
endless task, which will probably take an infinite time. Man or other
living organism may never know the whole truth yet, or in other words
only in infinite time. Therefore now in
mid-2012 after finishing my major work at the Philosophy of Balance I
already work at the Philosophy of Balance only to limited extent,
because every philosophy would have to contain infinity of pages of
text to be perfect, which I want to avoid.
The
above observation about the infinitude of knowledge can be compared to
it, if someone other than God, if any, attempt to create such an
accurate paper model of Karlstejn Castle, because Karlstejn Castle
consists of material, that is in my opinion infinitely divisible, it
will be an endless task, due to the mortality of man it must always
finish sometimes.
|
