Charitylogy

 

PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE
PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:

 

„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." All the rest consists more in views (speculations).

 

JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.

Own expense, Hustopeče, Czech Republic, copyleft 2016.

In support of the political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures www.spvzt.cz .

This book is released under CC BY-SA 3.0, text of the license see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ .

 

E-mail: ak-gruza@seznam.cz ,

See also literature: www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.e-polis.cz , http://youtu.be/YhOv47fQlRU , http://youtu.be/ibV-Fwh4sUc , www.filosofie.cz/forum/forum.asp?FORUM_ID=3

  

http://www.centipedia.com/images/en/8/88/AdamAndEve_fx.png

My text on the www.spvzt.cz and on the mentioned webs is licensed under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported, copyleft, unless stated specifically otherwise.

(All quotations from the Bible in this book because of copyright are on principle in Czech from Kralice Bible see http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~rovnanim/bible/k/1K15.php , or from the Bible Old and New Testaments | including deuterocanonic books |, Czech Ecumenical Translation, CZECH Bible Society, 1995, see www.biblenet.cz ,  in English from King James Version http://www.biblegateway.com/ )

 

CONTENT:

 

Questionnaire about definition of love in by you held worldview from the point of view of the science of love (charitylogy) … 5

 

1) 05/03/2016 Conflict of carnivorous and herbivorous living cells in the human body. … 26

2) 06/03/2016 Limits of charitylogy as exact, i.e. measurable science. … 26

3) 07/03/2016 Desire but unbelief in the power of charity in nearly all living creatures. … 26

4) 13/03/2016 How apparently Islam tries to eliminate from the Muslim population the genetic information of homosexuality, virtually effeminacy of men and to educate from Muslim men the highly masculine warriors. According to charitylogy in this context the basic question is: Are the world and the nature governed by Christian love (i.e. charity) or by predation? … 26

5) 15/03/2016 History of Judaism, Christianity and Islam in the light of the basic historical question in terms of Philosophy of Balance and charitylogy, which is: Are the world and the nature governed by Christian love (i.e. charity) or by predation? … 27

6) 25/03/2016 Does man's brain govern over his sperm cells or do his sperm cells govern over his brain? … 37

7) 04/04/2016 Commentary of Biblical Book of Job according to the Philosophy of Balance and fictitious letter of Lord to contemporary suffering Job according to the Philosophy of Balance about the reason of his suffering. … 38

8) 04/03/2016 Question of dualism of good and evil in a world from the point of view of charitylogy. … 41

9) 16/04/2016 Idolatry. … 41

10) 16/04/2016 Psychoanalysis Freud versus Jung. … 42

11) 17/04/2016 End of the Universe, nuclear war on Earth, and the general relativity theory of Albert Einstein according to Philosophy of Balance. … 44

12) 25/04/2016 Beginning of salvation or the end of the world in the presidential elections in present-day Austria according to the Philosophy of Balance. Nazism as a result of Christian and Jewish heresy? … 46

13) 28/04/2016 Usury, especially in the Czech Republic. … 48

14) 30/04/2016 Integrated crop agriculture or ecological organic crop agriculture in the Czech Republic according to the Philosophy of Balance. … 53

15) 03/05/2016 My relationship to carnivores and herbivores according to the Philosophy of Balance. … 54

16) 05/05/2016 Killing of animals in Hinduism and Buddhism according to verified sources (i.e. novinky.cz , Hare Krishna Movement, vyzivaspol.cz , Alexej Pludek: Advisor of Great Rajas/ Rádce velkých rádžů etc.). … 57

17) 08/05/2016 My solution to the problem of infertility of my contemporary fiancée. … 60

18) 08/05/2016 About historicity of Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ and about lifelong virginity of his mother Mary, possibly about lifelong virginity of his father Joseph. … 63

19) 10/05/2016 Merciful multiplication of meat, namely of dead fishes for feeding hosts by Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ according to modern exact science. … 64

20) 12/05/2016 Muslims as a scourge of God according to Abu Bakr (about 573 Mecca – 23rd August, 634 anno Domini Medina) the first caliph after Muhammad, according to the Philosophy of Balance punishing Christians and Jews especially for contemporary Christian and Jewish slaughter agricultural factory farms - contemporary concentration camps of here tortured animals … 65

21) 13/05/2016 Probabilities of end or salvation of Western rational civilization and of victory or contrarily of the rationalization of primitive instincts on Earth. … 67

22) 21/052016 The Prophet Muhammad, i.e. alive against the Christian Mahomet or Mohamed, i.e. dead … 68

23) 28/05/2016 Why it is better to eat gradually only certain plant fruits and certain plant seeds, and why it is better to eat only in extreme need on principle gradually certain eggs, certain carrions also of animals, certain blood or parts of by it not killed certain whole plants or then either other parts of certain plants or whole certain plants and only then certain milk and about cause of probable slaughter of the Canaanites including women and also young children in the book of Joshua by the Jews and about the right apparently Mongolian way of breeding of dairy cattle. … 81

24) 04/06/2016 My Devillogy in my up to now personal life experience, i.e. the Old Testament Yahweh as Satan, i.e. Satan as both the tempter and executioner of all living creatures also of Jews (i.e. also in relation to Jews telling both partly truth and partly lies) and in all these completely serving New Testament charitable only one God, communism, about women as a tool of the Devil, i.e. Satan or why eg. also Hindus probably publicly lie about killing animals. … 84

25) 19/06/2016 About the basic metaphysical question, if it is possible to kill Satan, i.e. the Devil, i.e. death, and further about expropriation without compensation, i.e. communism and about the modern State of Israel and about Muslim Palestinians and further about the most popular contemporary Czech politicians Milos Zeman, Andrej Babiš and Karel Schwarzenberg, and about the expelled Czech Sudeten Germans and about the by possibly Jewish Andrej Babiš dominated Czech political Green Party and about the Austrian presidential elections in 2016. … 89

26) 30/06/2016 (Mathematical definition of the Biblical God) … 91

27) 06/07/2016 The apparently only one possible (also Biblical) righteous philosophy of carnivores, virtually also of all other predators and also about the correct interpretation of Jewish and Christian Biblical laws of righteous fight, and about the only one real Christian Church, i.e. about the only one true Christian community according to the Philosophy of Balance and apparently also according to Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ and episode no. 2 of my article: “Beginning of salvation or the end of the world in the presidential elections in present-day Austria according to the Philosophy of Balance. Nazism as a result of Christian and Jewish heresy?” … 93

28) 15/07/2016 My personal up to now life experience and relationship with the Jews. … 109

29) 21/07/2016 Notes on the Biblical Old Testament King David from the perspective of the Philosophy of Balance and apparently the contract of the Christ, apparently Jesus of Nazareth and of the Devil, i.e. Biblical Satan about the division of rule over the world in the period of this King David, and in the period of formation of Protestantism and at present time and apparently its essential content. … 110

30) 07/08/2016 Jehovah's Witnesses and Philosophy of Balance. … 137

31) 07/08/2016 Angels and demons. … 139

32) 07/08/2016 The function of living creatures before death (for example of Biblical both Adam and Eve) in the Last Judgment. … 140

33) 09/082016 Against organic (i.e. ecological, i.e. bio) foods, i.e. against possible slave labor in the style of the German Nazis or against possible Orthodox Jewish provocation and about enslavement of the Czech State by the Orthodox Jews through usury as during government of the Orthodox Jew Joseph in ancient Egypt, see the Bible, Old Testament, book Genesis, chapter 47, verse 13-26? … 140

34) 12/08/2016 Why Czech government proposal of legal Act, which Minister for Justice of the Czech government Mr. Robert Pelikán (from ANO, i.e. political movement “Action of dissatisfied citizens 2011”) together with another Minister of the Czech government Mr. Jiří Dienstbier (from ČSSD, i.e. “Czech Social Democratic Party”) have submitted and of which approval the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic should decide September 5, 2016 and which enables to adopt the child of a homosexual partner also by a homosexual man, (this proposal) endangers the life of this child with a relatively high probability in crisis situations. From senior representatives of the Czech Republic (i.e. one of the European States) Mr. Andrej Babiš (ANO), Mr. Dan Ťok (ANO), Mr. Jiří Dienstbier (ČSSD), Mrs. Karla Šlechtová (ANO), Mrs. Kateřina Valachová (ČSSD), Mr. Lubomír Zaorálek (ČSSD), Mrs. Michaela Marksová (ČSSD), Mr. Richard Brabec (ANO) a Mr. Robert Pelikán (ANO) a Mr. Jiří Dienstbier expressed open support for this proposal. … 142

35) 22/08/2016 Question from evolutionary biology from Biblical perspective: In the past could carnivorous tyrannosaurus and herbivorous Brontosaurus cross-breed and have joint descendants? … 144

36) 14/09/2016 About hell of sinful people in this world … 145

37) 22/04/2017 Problem of Roman Catholic Christian religion and premarital sex … 146

38) 27/05/2017 Why do women choose men with robbers genes? … 148

39) 03/06/2017 Theory of evolution and success on marriage market and at fertilization? … 148

40) 05/06/2017 Theory of successful firm from viewpoint of Philosophy of Balance … 148

41) 28/06/2017 How to do from orthodox Israel more unorthodox Israel … 149

 

Appendices Philosophy of Balance or ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY as biblical paradise in the world for all living creatures by our own forces as commentary on Bible, Genesis, chapter 1-4 … 151

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Questionnaire about definition of love in by you held worldview from the point of view of the science of love (charitylogy)

 

Your worldview: Christian, Muslim, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, other belief, fill what:  , atheist, fascist and other right-wing dictatorship, Communist and other left-wing dictatorship, right-wing Liberal Democrat, center Liberal Democrat,  left-wing Liberal Democrat, evolutionist, not Darwinist,  Darwinist, creationist

As a philosopher and jurist I aims to establish a science of love (charitylogy), for this reason I present to you the following questionnaire to find your definition of love (charity) as the representative of a particular worldview. Please send anonymously filled questionnaire for possible publication on zakladatel@spvzt.cz . (in more details see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.cz )

Results of the questionnaire of major worldviews according to my theoretical assumptions

Regardless of the weight of merits for less both death and pain, and regardless of the responsibility for more both death and pain the advantaging (prioritization) in causing less both death and pain of various living creatures in comparison to other living creatures according to major human worldviews

Belief from newest to oldest:

Philosophy of Balance

Muslim

Buddhist

Roman Catholic Christian

Jew

Hindu

1) You as a human in comparison to other people

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

2) You and Your immediate family in comparison to other people

No

No

No

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No

3) You and members of Your sex in Your immediate family in comparison to members of other sex in Your immediate family

No

Yes, i.e. women/ Maximally little less both death and pain

No

No

No

Yes, i.e. men/ Maximally in hugely less both death and pain

4) You and Your immediate family and Your distant relatives in comparison to other people

No

No

No

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No

5) You and Your fellow humans in comparison to other people

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

6) other people in comparison to Your enemies-humans

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

7) Your together believers in comparison to from You distinct believers

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

8) Your together believers - Your friends in comparison to Your together believers while not Your enemies and while not Your relatives

No

No

No

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

9) members of Your nationality while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies in comparison to members of other nationality while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies

No

No

No

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

10) members of Your race while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies in comparison to members of other race while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies

No

No

No

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain/No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

11) members of Your skin color while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies in comparison to members of other skin color while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies

No

No

No

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

12) members of Your social strata (class) while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies in comparison to members of other social strata (class) while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies

No

No

No

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

13) Your friends-other living creatures than humans in comparison to Your not friends-the humans

No

No

No

No

No

Yes, i.e. cows and bulls/Maximally in hugely less both death and pain

14) Your friends-other living creatures than humans in comparison to other humans while friends

No

Yes, i.e. pigs / In variously less both death and pain

No

Yes, i.e. dogs and cats /Maximally in hugely less both death and pain

Yes, i.e. pigs / In variously less both death and pain

Yes, i.e. cows and bulls/Maximally in hugely less both death and pain

15) humans in comparison to other living creatures than humans

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No and also Yes /In variously less both death and pain

16) humans in comparison to believed higher animals

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No with exception of causing less both death and pain of cows and bulls

17) humans in comparison to other mammals (i.e. believed higher animals – for example  mammals)

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No with exception of causing less both death and pain of cows and bulls

18) humans and other mammals in comparison to birds (i.e. also believed higher animals)

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No with exception of causing less both death and pain of cows and bulls

19) humans and other mammals and also birds in comparison to reptiles and to reptiles as similar believed higher animals like on principle amphibians

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No with exception of causing less both death and pain of cows and bulls

20) humans and other mammals and also birds and also reptiles and to reptiles as similar believed higher animals like on principle amphibians in comparison to fish and to fish as similar believed higher animals like on principle amphibians and like snails and like jellyfish and like crabs and also cancers

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No with exception of causing less both death and pain of cows and bulls

21) humans and other mammals and also birds and also reptiles and also fish and all them also humans as similar believed higher animals in comparison to insects and to insects and animals similar to them and to them similar trees and to these trees similar plants

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

No with exception of causing less both death and pain of cows and bulls

22) humans and other mammals and also birds and also reptiles and also fishes and amphibians and all them also humans similar animals and to them similar trees and to these trees similar plants in comparison to other both trees and to trees similar plants, for example also some bushes

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes with exception of both trees and to trees similar plants / In variously less both death and pain

23) humans and other mammals and other believed higher animals and from believed higher animals not very different other animals and trees and to trees similar plants in comparison to flowers and to flowers similar plants, for example also bushes and also both many fungi and algaes

No

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes with exception of both trees and to trees similar plants / In variously less both death and pain

24) humans and other mammals and other believed higher animals and from believed higher animals not very different other animals and woody plants and herbaceous plants and  to both woody and herbaceous plants similar both plants and, as the case may be, fungi in comparison to other multicelular organisms

No with exception of causing more both death and pain of all following  living creatures, if they are multicelular organisms, i.e. animal sperm and unfertilized animal one egg and animal sperm one cell and  many plant seeds and plant fruit and plant one seed

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes with exception of both trees and flowers and to both trees and flowers similar plants / In variously less both death and pain

25) humans and other multicellular organisms in comparison to single-celled organisms and viruses

No with exception of causing more both death and pain of all following  living creatures, if they are single-celled organisms, i.e. animal sperm and unfertilized animal one egg and animal sperm one cell and  many plant seeds and plant fruit and plant one seed

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes/In variously less both death and pain

Yes with exception of multicelular organisms very different from believed higher animals with exception of animal one egg  / In variously less both death and pain

 

Simplified questions of the questionnaire, mark off or supplement if need be in the .docx format suitable response:

 

1)

1.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of You as a human at the cost of more both death and pain of other people?

NO                YES

1.2 If you answered YES to Question 1.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to other people, to save both death and pain of You as a human?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

2)

2.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of You and Your immediate family at the cost of more both death and pain of other people?

NO                YES

2.2 If you answered YES to Question 2.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to other people, to save both death and pain of You and Yourimmediate family?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

3)

3.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of You and members of Your sex in Your immediate family at the cost of more both death and pain of members of other sex in Your immediate family?

NO                YES

3.2 If you answered YES to Question 3.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to members of other sex in Your immediate family, to save both death and pain of You and members of Your sex in Your immediate family?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

4)

4.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of You and Your immediate family and Your distant relatives at the cost of more both death and pain of other people?

NO                YES

4.2 If you answered YES to Question 4.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to other people, to save both death and pain of You and Your immediate family and Your distant relatives?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

5)

5.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of You and Your fellow humans at the cost of more both death and pain of other people?

NO                YES

5.2 If you answered YES to Question 5.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to other people, to save both death and pain of You and Your fellow humans?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

 

6) * read carefully other wording of statements

6.1 If necessary do you consider right to cause more both death and pain to Your enemies-humans than other people?

NO                YES

6.2 If you answered YES to Question 6.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to Your enemies-humans than other people?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

7)

7.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of Your together believers at the cost of more both death and pain of from You distinct believers?

NO                YES

7.2 If you answered YES to Question 6.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to from You distinct believers, to save both death and pain of Your together believers?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

8)

 

8.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of Your together believers – Your

friends at the cost of more both death and pain of Your together believers while not Your enemies and while not Your relatives?

 

NO                YES

8.2 If you answered YES to Question 8.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to Your together believers while not Your enemies and while not Your relatives, to save both death and pain of Your together believers - Your friends?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

9)

9.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of members of Your nationality while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies at the cost of more both death and pain of members of other nationality while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies?

NO                YES

9.2 If you answered YES to Question 9.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to members of other nationality while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies, to save both death and pain of members of Your nationality while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

 

 

 

10)

 

10.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of members of Your race while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies at the cost of more both death and pain of members of other race while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies?

 

NO                YES

10.2 If you answered YES to Question 10.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to members of other race while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies, to save both death and pain of members of Your race while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

11)

11.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of members of Your skin color while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies at the cost of more both death and pain of members of other skin color while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies?

NO                YES

11.2 If you answered YES to Question 11.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to members of other skin color while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies, to save both death and pain of members of Your skin color while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

12)

12.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of members of Your social strata (class) while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies at the cost of more both death and pain of members of other social strata (class) while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies?

NO                YES

12.2 If you answered YES to Question 12.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to members of other social strata (class) while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies, to save both death and pain of members of Your social strata (class) while not Your relatives and while not Your enemies?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

13)

13.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of Your friends-other living creatures than humans at the cost of more both death and pain of Your not the friends-the humans?

NO                YES

13.2 If you answered YES to Question 13.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to Your not the friends-the humans, to save both death and pain of Your friends-other living creatures than humans?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

 

14)

14.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of Your friends-other living creatures than humans at the cost of more both death and pain of other humans while friends?

NO                YES

14.2 If you answered YES to Question 14.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to other humans while friends, to save both death and pain of Your friends-other living creatures than humans?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

15)

15.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of humans at the cost of more both death and pain of other living creatures than humans?

NO                YES

15.2 If you answered YES to Question 15.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to other living creatures than humans, to save both death and pain of humans?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

16)

16.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of humans at the cost of more both death and pain of believed higher animals?

NO                YES

16.2 If you answered YES to Question 16.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to believed higher animals, to save both death and pain of humans?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

17)

17.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of humans at the cost of more both death and pain of other mammals than humans?

NO                YES

17.2 If you answered YES to Question 17.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to other mammals than humans, to save both death and pain of humans?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

18)

18.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals at the cost of more both death and pain of birds?

NO                YES

18.2 If you answered YES to Question 18.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to birds, to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

19)

19.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds at the cost of more both death and pain of reptiles and amphibians?

NO                YES

19.2 If you answered YES to Question 19.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to reptiles and amphibians, to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

20)

20.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds and reptiles and amphibians at the expense of both death and pain of fish and snail and jellyfish and cancers and crabs?

NO                YES

20.2 If you answered YES to Question 20.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to fish and snail and jellyfish and cancers and crabs, to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds and reptiles and amphibians?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

21)

21.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds and reptiles and amphibians and fish and snail and jellyfish and cancers and crabs at the cost of more both death and pain of insects and and to them similar trees and to these trees similar other plants, e.g. some bushes?

NO                YES

21.2 If you answered YES to Question 21.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to insects and and to them similar trees and to these trees similar other plants, e.g. some bushes, to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds and reptiles and amphibians and fish and snail and jellyfish and cancers and crabs?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

22)

22.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds and reptiles and amphibians and fish and snail and jellyfish and cancers and crabs and insects and to them similar trees and to these trees similar plants, e.g. some bushes at the cost of more both death and pain of other both trees and bushes?

NO                YES

22.2 If you answered YES to Question 22.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to other both trees and bushes, to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds and reptiles and amphibians and fish and snail and jellyfish and cancers and crabs and insects and and to them similar trees and to these trees similar plants, e.g. some bushes?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

23)

23.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds and reptiles and amphibians and fish and snail and jellyfish and cancers and crabs and insects and trees and bushes at the cost of more both death and pain of flowers and mushrooms?

NO                YES

23.2 If you answered YES to Question 23.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to flowers and mushrooms, to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds and reptiles and amphibians and fish and snail and jellyfish and cancers and crabs and insects and trees and bushes?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

 

 

24)

24.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds and reptiles and amphibians and fish and snail and jellyfish and cancers and crabs and insects and trees and bushes and flowers and mushrooms at the cost of more both death and pain of algaes and mildews?

NO                YES

24.2 If you answered YES to Question 24.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to algaes and mildews, to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds and reptiles and amphibians and fish and snail and jellyfish and cancers and crabs and insects and trees and bushes and flowers and mushrooms?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

25)

25.1 If necessary do you consider right to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds and reptiles and amphibians and fish and snail and jellyfish and cancers and crabs and insects and trees and bushes and flowers and mushrooms and algaes and mildews and both unripe animal sperm and unfertilized unripe animal egg and also unripe plant seeds and unripe plant fruit and unripe plant one seed at the cost of more both death and pain of gradually all of the following both ripe plant fruits and ripe plant seeds and also both unfertilized ripe animal egg and ripe animal sperm?

NO                YES

25.2 If you answered YES to Question 25.1, answer also the question: Maximally how much more both death and pain you consider right, if necessary, to cause to gradually all of the following both ripe plant fruits and ripe plant seeds and also both unfertilized ripe animal egg and ripe animal sperm, to save both death and pain of humans and other mammals and also birds and reptiles and amphibians and fish and snail and jellyfish and cancers and crabs and insects and trees and bushes and flowers and mushrooms and algaes and mildews and both unripe animal sperm and unfertilized unripe animal egg and also unripe plant seeds and unripe plant fruit and unripe plant one seed?

Maximally little more both death and pain

Maximally much more both death and pain

Maximally hugely more both death and pain

As you want more both death and pain

Variously more both death and pain

In Hustopeče February 16, 2016 JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1) 05/03/2016 Conflict of carnivorous and herbivorous living cells in the human body.

Starting from the exact natural science hypothesis of the Philosophy of Balance about living microorganisms able to recognize and remember their friend and enemy and friend and enemy of their related microorganisms, then carnivorous living cells of the human body, which are an evolutionary remnant of carnivorous living creatures in the human body (eg. in the human brain there are the parts related to reptiles, so-called the archicortex), need to survive, that the human eats also meat at present, otherwise those carnivorous living cells die, hate and according to aforementioned hypothesis of the Philosophy of Balance also take revenge on the human as their enemy. Contrarily both the herbivorous living cells of the body of the human and the aforementioned carnivorous living cells of the body of the human hate and according to aforementioned hypothesis of the Philosophy of Balance also take a revenge on this human as an enemy for eating their evolutionary relatives living creatures, especially animals. The necessary condition for solving the aforementioned dilemma of charity (i.e. love) of the human and to maintain the symbiosis of all living cells of body of the human which are an evolutionary relic and evolutionarily related to all species of all living creatures on the Earth or possibly also in the Universe, that this human prevents conflicts, virtually disorganization of living microorganisms of his or her body because of the prevalence of their mutual enmity, virtually hatred and apparently also taking revenge, and that thus this human remained mentally and physically healthy, is according to aforementioned hypothesis of the Philosophy of Balance and well as according to charitylogy, that this human caused the least possible death and pain.

2) 06/03/2016 Limits of charitylogy as exact, i.e. measurable science.

Limits of charitylogy as exact, i.e. measurable science may be apparently proved as follows. E.g. apparently it is not always possible to measure, if human kills more brain living cells of the body of this human due to radiation when calling by a mobile phone (i.e. by a cellphone, i.e. by a cellular phone) than due to the stress of this human, that he or she could not carry out the necessary phone call with this mobile phone.

3) 07/03/2016 Desire but unbelief in the power of charity in nearly all living creatures.

In my experience nearly all living creatures including predators including their leaders are aware, that they want, that the world is governed by the love (charity), but they do not believe it, they rather believe, that the world is governed by predation (predators). They want to prove by charitylogy, virtually charitylogist then, that the exact scientific hypothesis, that the world (Universe) is governed by love (charity), is completely correct, partially correct or completely incorrect.

4) 13/03/2016 How apparently Islam tries to eliminate from the Muslim population the genetic information of homosexuality, virtually effeminacy of men and to educate from Muslim men the highly masculine warriors. According to charitylogy in this context the basic question is: Are the world and the nature governed by Christian love (i.e. charity) or by predation?

From the below documentary film Life on the coast of Dubai, an oasis of luxury I found, that in Dubai there are two kinds of men on principle, the first kind of men in Dubai are wealthy native inhabitants in Dubai, who live in luxury, on principle apparently only the Koran and probably the natural sciences, if they do not contradict the Koran, are accessible of all human knowledge to them, I know from other sources, that the Arab States should censor the internet and for example they make inaccessible in their countries also the largest global encyclopedia of all human knowledge accessible in all languages also in Arabic, which is www.wikipedia.org . The second kind of men in Dubai are workers from poor Muslim countries working apparently for little remuneration of several hundred euros per month, of which they feed their poor families in their home poor Islamic countries. These poor workers are often doing a very hard work, eg. on construction of skyscrapers, and of many other large buildings made of concrete in Dubai they work also 12 hours per day, often in the heat of around 50 degrees Celsius in the outdoor air with one day of rest on by Islam ordained Friday. In Dubai there are women and men separated each from other, here men and women practically never meet together and never communicate together with the exception of young children before early adolescence and with the exception of men and of women in immediate family, i.e. especially with the exception of brothers and of sisters and with the exception of husband and wife or as the case may be wives (I know, that in Islamic countries there is permitted polygamy under certain conditions), if in Dubai eg. on the beach a man meets an unknown woman, she is almost always completely covered, so that on principle only her eyes are shown from her body in narrow opening in her dress, so that she can determine the orientation by means of her eyes during her movement through the streets, in the water there are only men and then very young girls before reaching early adolescence both undressed in swimsuit. The men after reaching early adolescence - native inhabitants in Dubai before the wedding meet and communicate only among themselves and even elsewhere, eg. in the school they do not possibly meet with uncovered women and they do not possibly communicate with women, eg. with women of the same age (in this sense statement of the Arab young man - native inhabitant in Dubai was not entirely clear in the above documentary film), man - native inhabitant in Dubai after the wedding meets apparently from uncovered women and he communicates from women only with women from his immediate family (see above). Husband for a young woman is elected then on principle by her parents, on principle by her father, the agreement on the future marriage of their daughter is often concluded already for very young children, so called honor murders of young girls by members of her family are relatively frequent, if a young girl finds a husband herself, especially if she refuses therefore the by her parents elected husband (see http://www.novinky.cz/zahranicni/evropa/382782-tehotnou-kurdskou-uprchlici-v-nemecku-zabila-rodina-aby-si-uchranila-cest.html ). In Dubai the aforementioned adult men - workers from poor Muslim countries do not have apparently women from their immediate family and in Dubai they do not meet uncovered women with the exception of native very young girls before early adolescence or they do not communicate directly with women there. In Dubai the men after reaching early adolescence, who begins sexually harass other men in this on principle exclusively male society, this applies especially to sexually mature men before the wedding, are in imminent danger of death in accordance with the rules of Islam according to the Koran or the radical, virtually orthodox Muslims kills directly them (see http://www.novinky.cz/krimi/395820-zadna-nenavist-ale-nabozensky-text-haji-pred-soudem-knihu-muslim-sanka.html ). In this way apparently Islam tries to eliminate from the Muslim population the genetic information of homosexuality, virtually effeminacy of men and to educate from Muslim men the highly masculine individuals.

Literature: Life on the coast of Dubai, an oasis of luxury (10/10), documentary film, 45 minutes, France broadcasted on TV 11/03/2016 18:00 - CT 2 (i.e. The Czech Television, second program), see https://tv.seznam.cz/?date=2016-3-11

5) 15/03/2016 History of Judaism, Christianity and Islam in the light of the basic historical question in terms of Philosophy of Balance and charitylogy, which is: Are the world and the nature governed by Christian love (i.e. charity) or by predation?

This basic pattern according to charitylogy as the science about love, i.e. about charity according to the Philosophy of Balance used by me for understanding and commentary of the history of the three great related world religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam can easily be viewed as follows: Eg. if the mother member of the Christian church or atheistic mother, if both believe in mercy and Christian love (i.e. charity) and they speak to her child, that the world is governed by mercy or Christian love (i.e. charity), and that her son or daughter should therefore also be merciful, so these mother must expect from a significant part of her offspring eg. such a response, mother, yesterday I saw the cat as it caught live mouse, at first the cat tortured it (i.e. playing with it), then the cat killed and ate it, and mother, you eat and you give us to eat the meat of animals which are tortured and killed in slaughter agricultural factory farms (eg. after birth in these factory farms there is denied freedom of movement of  animals not to lose weight, these animals are fed by drugs to quickly get fatter, and shortly after birth, often as pups or shortly after reaching adulthood these animals are killed), mother, we have to believe you, that the nature or world are governed by mercy or Christian love, i.e. charity and not by predation, mother, you lie us and on the basis of this reasoning a large proportion of these children will choose the predation as their religion, whether in the form of Islam, Judaism or they become hypocritical predatory Christians or predatory Hindus or predatory atheists or they believe Darwinism, and they will not believe that the world or nature are governed by mercy or Christian love (i.e. charity), or by God who should be mercy or Christian love (i.e. charity). On the contrary Jewish or Muslim mother would answer to her aforementioned daughter or son apparently according to Judaism or Islam, that being predatory or a predator is absolutely right, that her son or daughter should be merciful or charitable only to their friends and against other living creatures, especially against other humans, other animals and other plants he or she must throughout his or her life in the world to fight to the death as a predator until he or she joins them to his or her pack, kills them or enslaves them, as do such predatory wolves, which are merciful or charitable only to members of their own pack of wolves and against other living creatures, especially against prey or against other wolf packs they must fight to the death. This opinion of domination of predation in the world on the above question of charity or predation of the world based on Judaism or Islam is controversial according to the Philosophy of Balance again, although this opinion of Judaism or Islam can sound reasonable, because it largely coincides with the experience of all living creatures, but according to the Philosophy of Balance all children, all mothers, as well as well as all fathers or all other men and all other living creatures never fully accept domination of predation in the world, even if it contradicted an irrefutable proof of reason, which has not been given yet, because according to the Philosophy of Balance all living creatures in fact feel that they very dislike the domination of predation in the world (i.e. it is very contrary to their emotions) and they are in fact very unwilling it (i.e. it is very contrary to their will).

 

History of the Israelis as a great nation has begun according to the Bible in Egyptian slavery of Israelis, of which cause was according to the Bible the enslavement of the Egyptian population by Joseph the Israeli adviser of pharaoh using the usury, according to modern historical science the Joseph's pharaoh was the national of the Semitic tribes of Hyksos relatives of the Israelis, these tribes conquered the northern Egypt in the first half of the 17th century before our era, BC (before Christ) (calculated in the Christian world from the birth of Jesus of Nazareth, according to the Philosophy of Balance apparently the God, hereinafter referred to as "our era"). After the expulsion of Hyksos these enslaved Egyptians enslaved on the contrary the Israelis, who had moved in extreme need of death from starvation as guests to Egypt according to the Bible during the reign of Hyksos and adviser Joseph as great-grandson of the biblical Abraham and as the grandson of the biblical Isaac, i.e. son of Abraham and as son of Biblical Jacob called Israel. According to the Bible Israelis as the descendants of Abraham and Isaac seized control over the territory of Palestine and Israel in a murderous conquest war led according to the Bible by both Old Testament and New Testament only one God according to historical science probably around the year 1000 BC, where according to the Bible Israelis killed all the local population, including women and children, after that they had been liberated as a nation from the above Egyptian slavery in liberation war according to the Bible led also by above mentioned only one God. The question of killing of all local population by the Israelis during their conquest of the territory of today's Israel and Palestine is controversial (modern archaeology in excavations in Israel has not apparently proved a sudden burning or the disappearance of a large number of cities mentioned in the Bible in the Book of Joshua in connection with Joshua's war in such a short interval in the relevant period of time, see the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Joshua#Historical_and_archaeological_evidence , modern archaeology rather assumes a gradual assimilation of both Israelis and former local population in Israel and Palestine), however the fact remains, that today and apparently also in the past it was very difficult to convert, i.e. to connect to the religion of Israelis, or of today's Jews, in addition, that on principle the Israel religion is the national religion of the blood related persons, on principle today's Jews, virtually Israelis do not marry, virtually have not children with  women from other nations and today's Jewish women with men from other nations, however it is with frequent exceptions that violate this rule, nowadays children of these mixed relationships can very easily connect to the Jewish nation and convert to the Jewish religion. According to the Bible after the conquest of Israel and Palestine the Jews have kept in their Temple in Jerusalem the largest slaughterhouse of cattle in antiquity (i.e. in ancient times). According to the Philosophy of Balance this big slaughter possibly of people, but quite surely of the animals in antiquity is the biggest reason of Israeli defeats in wars with other neighbouring nations, the division of the Kingdom of Israel into northern Israel and southern Judea, after the conquest of northern Israel by surrounding nations the reason for the demise of all the Israel tribes, with the exception of today's Jews from former Judea, i.e. the descendants of the biblical Joseph's brother, Judah and with the exception of Levites, i.e. the descendants of the biblical other Joseph's brother Levi, in northern Israel and southern Judea only for Levites their exclusive role of the priestly service of only one God in Israel temple was reserved.

 

Around the year 33 AD according to the New Testament of the Bible the Jews gave to kill Jesus of Nazareth, according to the Philosophy of Balance apparently Christ in execution, who preached reform of Judaism, but after its rejection by the Jews and the threat to Jesus' life by the Jews Jesus refused to start a murderous war against the Roman occupiers and also he refused to lead with his disciples against Jews an murderous civil war, see below, and according to the biblical New Testament Jesus let rather himself torture and kill in execution by Roman occupiers of Judea, whose leader in Judea Pontius Pilate gave command for it according to the Bible only after the hard pressure of the Jews, who otherwise threatened to revolt against the Romans in Judea, for these reasons the Jews have not recognized Jesus as the Savior, the Messiah, the Christ. After his death the part of the Jews joined the Christianity and members from many other nations joined the Christians, then the Jews encouraged the Romans to persecute, to torture and to kill early Christians, the persecution of the early Christians under the Roman Emperor Nero is proverbial, who blamed the early Christians from the great fire of Rome, the capital of the antique Roman Empire, Nero gave to torture and to kill in a large amount the early Christians for the amusement of the local population in large Roman circuses in the capital of today's Italy, Rome. Jewish southern Judea was conquered by the Romans and they expelled from it for almost two thousand years the Jews into exile (i.e. World Jewish diaspora) after the second Jewish-wide rebellion against the Roman domination, which took place in the years 132-135 anno Domini under the leadership of Simon bar Kokhba, who was declared by part of the Jews and Jewish religious leaders as the Savior, in Hebrew language the Messiah, in Greek language the Christ. The results of the war were terrible for the Jews. The Romans under the leadership of their Emperor Hadrian prohibited Jews from their religion, killed their scholars and prohibited them from possession and use of the Torah, i.e. the most important part of the biblical Old Testament. At that time the majority of the Jews from today's Israel and today's Palestine was given into slavery or was killed. On the place of Jerusalem the Romans gave to build Roman city, Aelia Capitolina, which was forbidden Jews to enter. Then all today's both Israel and Palestine were populated by non-Jewish inhabitants, from which the present-day Palestinian nation originated.

 

During the subsequent confusions and murderous civil wars within the ancient Roman Empire in 306 AD Constantine The Great was declared as emperor. In the year 312 AD Constantine's soldiers won with Christ on their shields the battle near Ponte Milvio in the Roman murderous civil war and in the following year Constantine published in Mediolanum (Milan).the Edict of Milan, which has recognized Christianity as equivalent religion, which became formally only tolerated but in fact the preferred religion of the Roman Empire, Christian Church already under Constantine became a pillar for the imperial power. In 312 AD Constantine reached domination over the West Roman Empire and in 324 AD after the Roman victory in the murderous civil war he was established as the sole ruler of the whole empire. In addition to the recognition of Christianity other major event of his governance was also the establishment of a new Rome, Constantinople. In 6th century AD, in the time of the migration of nations (virtually the conquest of Western Roman Empire, i.e. mainly today's Western Europe by the Germanic tribes and of Eastern Europe, i.e. mainly today's Russia by Slavs, in both cases they are the so-called Indo-European nations originally come probably from India, these two nations have adopted Christianity as their religion) the Centre of gravity of the Roman Empire definitively shifted to its richer and more stable eastern half with centre in Constantinople in Asia, which was formed after the demise of Western Roman Empire approximately in the year 476 of our era (i.e. anno Domini).

 

Islam was founded by Muhammad in the late 6th century AD, Muhammad was born and lived in Mecca as a trader. Islam builds on Judaism and Christianity, according to some scientists Muhammad had available when formulating the foundations of Islam in Mecca some inaccurate translations of the Jewish Old Testament and of the Christian New Testament from Jewish and Christian tribes, apparently of Jewish and Christian sects, of which members were present at that time in Mecca either as permanently established residents or as traders, because at that time rich Mecca was the most important commercial centre of the Arabian peninsula, excerpts from these translations are found also in the Koran and according to these excerpts the Western scientists also tried to identify these translations. According to Muhammad Islam was dictated to him in his religious exaltation by God through the Archangel Gabriel. According to Muhammad on the basis of this miracle he considered himself as the Prophet of only one God, whose aim was to reveal to Muhammad and through his mediation to the whole world the really true form of the Jewish Old Testament and of the Christian New Testament, as it was in fact revealed to the world by the previous Jewish and Christian prophets, for example Moses (in Hebrew language Moshe, in Arabic language Musa) or Jesus, who Muhammad and Islam did not consider as incarnated only one God, but as one of the prophets. Later before Muhammad's time the Jews and the Christians should falsify the Bible. At first Muhammad presumed, that to by him revealed true form of the Jewish and Christian Holy books all nations would voluntarily connect, in particular his tribe members in Mecca, all Arabs of the Arabian Peninsula, all Jews and all Christians. At first Muhammad tried to convince Mecca residents to connect voluntarily to Islam. In this period at first the inhabitants of Mecca ignored him, however when he succeeded in acquiring some supporters among the inhabitants of Mecca, the ruling layer of Mecca used against him the means of repression. It declared him as a madman and, when it failed, so they tried to kill him. According to the Philosophy of Balance the main cause of this resistance the inhabitants of Mecca to Islam was possibly, that Muhammad ate in this desert area of the Arabian peninsula, especially the products of the shepherds, thus slaughtered living animals, embodied also by living cells in the bodies of the inhabitants of Mecca, which so, figuratively spoken, would be not willing to admit, that someone, who eats their living relatives creatures, and for this purpose he kills very painfully them or he lets kill them, should be the Prophet of the only one God, who should unify in his religion all predators and all their prey. In other words that for this great death and pain responsible man, for example. Muhammad would be able to correct rightly the Holy Scriptures of the Bible according to reality. Possibly therefore Muhammad and his followers found themselves under a lot of pressure of their surroundings in Mecca and also in imminent danger of their lives. This situation in Mecca Muhammad and his followers solved through the escape into another Arabic city, competitive Medina, this escape in Islam called as Hijrah was in 622 AD, and from it in the Arabic world one counts the new Islamic era. From this time in Medina Muhammad and his followers have stopped believing in the voluntary connection of people to Islam and they gave priority to its spreading by violence of murderous war and of people killing. According to the Philosophy of Balance just human can lead war against his or her enemies in this war he or she can hurt a human, to exclude him or her from the fight, if however he or she must kill him or her, so this is possibly a substantial moral mistake of this human killing another human in the fight, i.e. possibly not only of a killed human in this fight. Furthermore according to the Philosophy of Balance a possibly weak human decides for this fight, in which he or she is willing to kill another human possibly from the fear caused by the Devil, according to the Philosophy of Balance embodying vacuum or death. However vacuum does not kill anyone, it just causes underpressure, i.e. the possibly insurmountable  fear of ordinary people, of which reason the mass is attracted and collided and it is split up into small pieces, i.e. a human dies. Collision with a pure vacuum, so with nothing or almost nothing is not able to break any material thing. Muhammad as a human, i.e. not as the God decided for the murderous war out of fear of death, thus of the fear for his life and the lives of his loved ones.

 

Apparently from the above reasons Muhammad decided to consider Ishmael among the Biblical persons as the ancestor of all Arabs. According to the Bible Ishmael was the eldest son of historically unconfirmed Jewish and Arabic Biblical forefather Abraham (in Arabic language Ibrahim), Abraham wants most of all in his life according to the Bible, that the nation originated from his descendants, God revealed to him and promised him it. At that time Abraham had the only one wife the Biblical Sarah, however until her age, when almost all women are already infertile, he had no children with her. Therefore Abraham and especially Sarah stopped to believe in this revelation of God to Abraham and these alleged promises of the God about their offspring. Sarah gave the Egyptian slave Hagar to Abraham, with whom Abraham had his firstborn son Ishmael. Then Angels visited Abraham and Sarah and they told to Sarah that she will have her own son. Sarah laughed at these messengers and she did not believe them because she thought that she was already infertile. However then Sarah gave birth to Abraham secondborn and Sarah's own son Isaac (in Hebrew Yitzhak). After his birth fratricidal fights gradually started among the two Abraham's sons and their mothers about the heritage of leadership of the tribe after that Abraham would die. Then Sarah forced Abraham to expel Hagar and her son into the desert with a small reserve of water, where they were threatened without the water by probable death. God, who revealed himself to Abraham according to the Bible, allegedly told him to obey Sarah in it. Then Abraham expelled Hagar and their firstborn son Ishmael in the desert with insufficient reserve of water. When in the desert there were Ishmael and his mother Hagar immediately threatened by death of thirst, she found and according to the Bible the God showed her water well and they survived. According to the Bible from the descendants of Ishmael and his Egyptian wife, who was found for him by his mother Hagar, a great nation originated that fought and fights against all his brothers, especially against the descendants of Isaac, i.e. today's Jews. Then Sarah died. Then Isaac found his wife Rebecca and Israelis, virtually Jews originated from their descendants according to the Bible. Then Abraham remarried and with his new wife he had several other sons. However Abraham bequeathed to Isaac everything, what he had.

 

Regarding the management of the murderous war for saving his life and the life of his loved ones Muhammad can be put in contrast to Jesus of Nazareth in the garden of Gethsemane before his arrest by the Jews before his torture and killing in execution, when according to the Bible Jesus, virtually the God should admit, that the Apostle Peter cut off the ear of the Jewish soldier, thus to hurt him, but, when it did not help, so he did not let to lead his disciples for him the murderous civil war against the Jews or against the Romans, one could say that he had the strength not to subordinate to Devil fear of his death (the Bible, John 18,1-10). According to the Philosophy of Balance all terribly suffering living creatures have the right to request from the God who should be according to Christianity the love, i.e. charity (Bible, 1 John 4.16) that, if it is necessary, He does not only committed the terrible suffering of living creatures, but he himself was willing this terrible suffering to experience, therefore from the standpoint of the Philosophy of Balance the living creatures have the right to request from a possible God, who should be according to Christianity the love, i.e. charity, that for reason of compassion He was tortured and died, which however does not prove perfectly, that Jesus of Nazareth really existed (communist historical science claimed that Jesus of Nazareth and the biblical Gospels are unprovable myth or manipulation) or that Jesus of Nazareth was the God, but from the perspective of Philosophy of Balance it appears from the above reasons more probable than improbable, in the case of the biblical Gospels it is according to Philosophy of Balance at least the brilliantly thought base of charitology as a science created under very primitive conditions 2000 years ago, when the foundations of modern science has not been laid yet and when the Jews usually wrote on parchment, i.e. on the skin of often tortured and murdered animals (Jesus himself supposedly had written nothing, the biblical New Testament was written on parchment by his followers), the Philosophy of Balance and charitology is based at least 51% on the Bible, especially on the 1-4 chapter of the book of Genesis, the Gospels of the New Testament and 1 John 4 chapter.

 

Therefore using the murderous conquest war at first Muhammad conquered Medina, he killed here in this murderous war a whole Jewish tribe that threatened his life, then he led a murderous war against his native Mecca, which then he succeeded in conquest with the help of his followers, who went with him from Mecca to Medina, and with the help of the inhabitants of Medina, after the conquest of Mecca more and more expanding Muhammad's  army still in his life conquered the entire Arabian Peninsula. The Arabs considered as proof, that Muhammad is the Prophet of God, and that by the murderous war he fulfilled the will of God, Muhammad's successes in fight, in particular, that with a small army of his relatively few followers from Mecca, who fled with him from Mecca to Medina, and with relatively few his followers obtained in Medina several times also from the beginning he defeated or repelled much stronger army, which after Muhammad's flight to Medina residents of Mecca sent against Muhammad and Medina. On the basis of the development of Islam and the life of Muhammad in the Muhammad's Koran, i.e. The Holy Book of Islam there are peaceful Suras of the Mecca period, which are interpreted by radical, virtually orthodox Muslims as Suras valid in the period when Islam is weak, and the violent Suras of the Meddina period, which according  to radical, virtually orthodox Muslims are applied in the period when Muslims are strong and they could lead war against unbelievers. Darul Harb, i.e. land of war is a land of unbelievers, Muslims are asked by radicals to get through to those countries, turning them over to their faith and multiply themselves until their numbers increase, and then to begin the war and to fight and to kill people, they make Islam the religion and they join this country to Darul Islam. After Muhammad's death in accordance with Arab tradition because of food poisoned by captured Jewish women Zaynab from by Muhammad's Army defeated enemies the Arabs united by Islam continued in a murderous conquest war, and they conquered many of today's Islamic countries in the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Muslims consider this period of their war successes as the ideal age of Islam guided and proving favour of only one God in relation to Muslims and they still want to copy it. 

 

However after Muhammad's death as a result of the mutual power struggles among Muslims, in which Ali Muhammad's successor and Muhammad's cousin and also Muhammad's son-in-law, who married his daughter Fatimah, was killed, the Muslim community is permanently divided into the Sunnis, who were loyal to the winner over Ali, the new caliph, and the Shiites, who as the rightful caliph considered and still consider Ali. About the crisis of Islam and decay on individual small caliphates we speak from 14th century of our era.

 

However at that time in Asia the new conquerors already appeared, who are Mongols. Uniting and subordination of the Mongolian tribes Temüjin, Khan of the Mongols, in Mongolian language Genghis Khan, which should mean in the translation great or world emperor, reached through conquest murderous wars. Temüjin was the son of a leader of one of the Mongol tribes, however his father was poisoned by an enemy tribe and about 10-year-old Temüjin was in direct danger of death. After the revolution in the Temüjin's tribe the successor of his father expelled Temüjin from the tribe to the Mongolian steppes and he told him that he returns for him, when he reaches adulthood, that he kills Temüjin after the fight. Young Temüjin made friendship with the son of a leader of another tribe Jamukha, who then took over the leadership of this tribe. Jamukha protected young Temüjin against his enemies, especially from his tribe, who after his adulthood wanted to kill him. Then Temüjin earned with his behavior and his courage the friendship of individuals from various Mongolian tribes with the help, of which he led to murderous conquest war against his enemies, and then with the help of his more and more expanding army he conquered and united all Mongols (also Tatars their relatives, below mentioned also only as Mongols), then Temüjin was forced apparently to kill his friend and savior of his life from his youth, Jamukha , who refused to be subordinated to him.

 

Temüjin set in a secret Chronicle of the Mongols, the three basic laws of Mongolian warriors: not to betray your Khan (punished with death regularly also of family members of traitor), to fight against the enemy until the end and the prohibition of killing women and children. A ban on the killing of women and children had the following purpose. The Mongols fought against all foreign nations that did not subordinate to them with the fact, that after their victory they killed on principle all adult men and adult boys, but on principle not women and very young boys. Of these women they made their slaves and they often raped them against their will to conceive them children. In this way the above mentioned very young boys, the sons of these women and of by the Mongols killed to Mongols hostile adult fathers acquired the half-blood brothers and sisters from the same mother and other fathers, and in adulthood they were often reconciled with the death of their fathers and they were loyal to the Mongols as members of their army, although they killed their fathers, otherwise they should fight to the death against their half-blood siblings born from the same mother, as they had, and the other Mongolian father. Or they should fight to the death with their mother, who should decide, if she shall protect her previously born son of her former by Mongols killed husband, or, if she shall protect her new son, to whom she gave birth with her new Mongol husband.

 

Similar tactics concerning the smaller killing enemy women and children, it is both girls of any age and apparently also very young boys, is applied also by Islam. Islam gives the people of the conquered territory the choice, either they become Muslims and then may survive, or they are Christians or Jews, according to Muhammad, the people of the Book, who must be subordinated to Muslims, or Muslims must enslave them, the adult male members of the other religions or atheists are killed after their defeat by the Muslims, women and children, it is both girls of any age and apparently also very young boys, are rather enslaved by Muslims and women are raped. In this sense, even though the Mongols and Islam were a religion of predators, within which adult men and enemies must be absolutely subordinate to his leader, otherwise they would usually be cruelly tortured and killed, so women has more protection and security than adult men, because on principle women are not killed.

 

in the murderous conquest wars the Mongols conquered the territory of Asia, especially of China (see medieval European or Italian traveler Marco Polo, who visited reportedly China during the reign of Temüjin's successor in China Kublai Khan), in the campaign further west into Europe the Mongols conquered the whole Russia, they reached Poland and Hungary, the Mongols failed to conquer Japan. Mongols together with Tatars founded their own State later by the Russians called the Golden Horde with the center in the Russian Caucasus, probably near present-day Russian Volgograd, formerly also called Stalingrad, which ruled over the by Mongols originally conquered huge area of Eastern Europe and Siberia, among other things over the whole territory of Russia and the former Soviet Union. The Russian principalities were not formally part of the territory of the Golden Horde, but they were subordinate to the Mongols. If Rurik, i.e. all Russian Princes wanted to govern in their own countries, then they had to be confirmed in their positions by Khan after they acknowledged his supreme power, thus belonging to the Mongol Empire. In the mid-14th century the Golden Horde was the largest and militarily strongest State in Eastern Europe. In its centre in Sarai there were untold revenues from taxes levied in the conquered countries, from transit control of Volga river, which connected north-sea-Baltic region with the Orient, from trade transactions with the Venetians and the Genoese, whose factories were along the coast of the Black and Azov Sea. Both the Mongols and the Tatars from the Golden Horde adopted for their religion Islam, however the predominant religion in Mongolia became Buddhism, that the Mongols knew from by them conquered China.

 

In the Golden Horde were decentralization tendencies, some of its territories became independent. As a result the Russian princes, whose position consolidated on the contrary, started thinking of armed resistance. The Mongols and the Tatars were defeated in the year 1350 AD in the first major open battle on the Kulikovo Field by the Russians led by Dmitry Donskoy, who after the death of his father inherited the Moscow throne and who was canonised by Orthodox Church. Then the Russians gradually conquered the whole territory of today's Russia, and they subjugated the fractured Mongolian and Tatar States.

 

Then the Mongols were similarly expelled for their disunity back to Mongolia from China around the year 1380 AD by local inhabitants of China led by local Chinese Ming rulers dynasty.

 

From the Mongol and Tatar Golden Horde due to the aforementioned military tactics of the enslavement of women of defeated nations in the region of the Caucasus the Seljuk and Ottoman Turks as the two representatives of more so-called turkic-tatar Nations originated apparently also through the mix of the Mongols and the local population, these Turks founded the so-called the Ottoman Empire with the Centre on the territory of present-day Turkey in Istanbul, which was one of the largest and most powerful empires in the area of the Mediterranean Sea. The Ottoman Empire existed in years from 1299 to 1922 AD and during this time it included the area of Asia Minor, the Balkans, the Black Sea, the Middle East and North Africa. From the 16th century the Ottoman Empire had completely the Islamic character of the God's State, in which from the beginning the sultans of the Ottoman dynasty ruled.

 

The Ottoman Empire bordered and led a series of wars with Orthodox Christian Russia, which took over the heritage of the Eastern Christian Byzantine Empire with the center in Constantinople. Constantinople, in 1930 AD officially renamed as Istanbul, which was the capital of the Roman Empire, after the division of the Roman Empire the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire, later known as the Byzantine Empire, and after the conquest by the Turks the capital of the Ottoman Empire. The Byzantine Empire prevented the above conquest murderous wars of the Arabs after the death of Muhammad in the period of 7-12th.centuries AD, as a result of which the Byzantine Empire suffered significant territorial losses. Especially the loss of rich Egypt, which was surrendered almost without fighting to the Arabs through the betrayal of the monophysitie Alexandrian Patriarch Cyrus (i.e. the Christian religious and political leader, whose religious concept of Jesus of Nazareth. so-called monophysitism was based on the presumption, that Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ had only one, i.e. absolutely divine and not human nature and therefore it could not be distinguished between father and son and between the divine and humanity in Christ, this monophysitism was declared by Christianity as one of the numerous heresies at that time), the Eastern Roman Empire decisively weakened.

 

Within the fight against another religious concept of Jesus of Nazareth in the West one began to claim that the Holy Spirit comes not only from the Father, but also from the Son, which was the pretext of the theological Great Schism between the Western Roman Empire Christianity (Catholic Church) and the Eastern Roman Empire Orthodox Christianity around the year 1054 AD. However previous long term mutual alienation of the population of the former two halves of the Roman Empire already led also to the Great Schism. The primary cause of the Schism was disputes over the authority of the Roman Pope, who claimed power over the other four ancient Patriarchates in the East, although the Eastern Patriarchs acknowledged him jurisdiction only over the Western Patriarchate of Rome. The gradual degradation of the Byzantine Empire culminated in the defeat of Constantinople in 1453 AD and the conquest of the remaining Byzantine territories by the Ottoman Turks. During its millennial existence the Byzantine Empire served as a shield of Christianity, thereby it significantly contributed to the protection of Europe against the spread of Islam. The heir to the politics and religion of the Byzantine Empire became especially Orthodox Russia.

 

At the beginning of the Middle Ages at the time of the migration of nations around the 6th century AD the Christian Slavs conquered Eastern Europe and Western Europe was conquered by the Christian Germans, who mixed with the local population. So in medieval Europe Christianity dominated, which resisted the murderous conquest Arabs wars (in Europe at that time Germanic, virtually Franconian King Charles I The Great stopped the Arab invasion that began with the across-floating of the Arabs from Africa to Spain and with their control of the territory of Spain, by Charles' victory on the Ebro river in Northeast Spain around the year 800 AD, who protected Christianity against its demise and Europe against the Islamization), the murderous conquest wars of the Mongols and the murderous conquest wars of the Ottoman Empire. Initially the only permitted religion in medieval Europe was by the State authorities enforced Christianity and inferior enslaved Judaism, however Jews were often tortured and killed by Christians.

 

The change occurred with the advent of modern era from 14th century AD, when after the discovery of America and Australia European Christians led the murderous conquest wars in these continents, where they killed the large part of local residents, especially the Indians in America, and murderous conquest wars in Africa, At that time Christianity was divided into many mutually hating churches, which one can divide in the basic way into the Roman Catholic Church headed by the Pope and Protestants, at that time also came a decline of Christianity in Europe, the development of secular natural and social sciences, and hereby also the liberation of the Jews from Christian slavery in Europe. According to the Philosophy of Balance the cause of the decline of Christianity was, that Christianity as Jesus' religion of love, i.e. of charity-caritas has ceased and perhaps never was credible for people, in the modern era the inhabitants of the West have begun to substitute it increasingly by philosophy of predation, for example by Darwinism, by which they began to approach the worldview advocated by Islam and Judaism, although many Jews were very attracted by Jesus' religion of love, i.e. of charity. The reason for this incredibility was mainly, that people saw, that mutual predation and not mutual love (i.e. charity) rules among people and animals and plants in the wild or in a world, and people did not understand, why in this situation they should believe church, whose priests claimed, that love, i.e. charity rules over nature or the world, especially when Christians themselves behaved predominantly and continue to behave predominantly in their factual conduct so, as if predation rules over the world (but as a Christian I rather hope according to the Bible King James Version (KJV), Matthew 16, 15 He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? 16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. 17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. 18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.).

 

A large contribution to the detection of this great Christian hypocrisy brought modern science and especially the liberation struggle of the Jews from their medieval Christian enslavement by the dissemination of Jewish ideology in science, that the world is not ruled by Christian love, i.e. charity, but by predation and that Jesus of Nazareth supposedly lied or was mistaken in it. However these Jewish and modern attacks against Jesus' religion of love, i.e. charity, and the unveiling of a huge hypocrisy of the vast majority of Christians, who act as predators in accordance with Judaism or Islam, i.e. not charitably, guided by an above-average share of Jewish managers on the management of the Western world in the modern times establishing in accordance with this Jewish belief about the predation government over the world in a large amount the above mentioned slaughter agricultural factory farms torturing and killing animals have turned especially against the Jews themselves.

 

Existing peak of this crisis of Christianity in the West the German Nazism became, German Nazism in addition, that it was based on the presumptions, that the world is ruled by predation and that for the win of its ideology it is necessary to lead the murderous conquest war, which is not substantially different from the older Judaism or Islam, so in accordance with Darwinism, which was based on the presumption, that purpose of this predation of evolution in nature or in the world is the natural selection of living individuals or species of living individuals, which should reproduce and which should die in this natural struggle for life, (the German Nazism) prohibited the Germans under the cruel punishments from mixed marriages and sexual relations, especially with the Jews but also with Slavs, and the German Nazism tried also to speed up this natural selection in the nature or in the world through total genocide of the according to it in relation to Germans, virtually to Germanic tribes inferior or competitive human races, which should be according to the German Nazis the Jews and perhaps also Slavs. So in their murderous conquest wars the German Nazism killed and counted in the final result with killing especially of all Jews and perhaps also of the Slavs, including women and children, and it is unlike the murderous conquest wars of contemporary Judaism and mostly of the entire Islam history. On the basis of its belief about government of predation over the world the German Nazism, the first philosophical predecessor of this belief was especially old Judaism, started to handle the Jews in the same way as the Jews had handled animals, the German Nazism started to build for the Jews the slaughter factory farms, of which goal was to receive on the basis of the alleged predation of the world the maximum economic benefit from Jewish human bodies, it started concentration of the Jews in the concentration camps, similar to agricultural slaughter factory farms for the animals, it exposed the Jews to slave labor with the least both amount and price of food, the German Nazism started to do unlimited medical experiments on the Jews, followed by mass killing of work-unable depleted tortured Jews in gas chambers in concentration camps, which was similarly mechanized as slaughter of livestock in slaughter agricultural factory farms, similarly the Nazis manufactured all parts of the Jewish bodies for economic benefit, so we could see at first sight absurd Nazi lamps coated with Jewish skin, the Nazi removing and economic manufacturing of hair and teeth of Jews before their killing for the purpose of economic exploitation. However on the contrary German Nazism protected animals and nature, the German Nazi laws were the most perfect laws on the protection of nature and animals, which has ever been adopted by any State in Europe. These German Nazi laws on the protection of nature and of animals survived the defeat of the German Nazism and remained valid in large part in West Germany and later in 1990 in united Germany up to the present.

 

The second result of the Jewish liberation struggle from the medieval Christian enslavement of Jews was the Communist ideology of the dictatorship of the proletariat, which was founded by philosophy of Karl Marx of Jewish origin and this Communist ideology was used for the domination over the Tsarist Russia by the former leader of the Bolshevik revolution of 1917 AD, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, who was apparently partially of Jewish origin, it should be proved by the letter which was written by Lenin's older sister, Anna Ulyanov and which was possible to read on the newly opened exhibition in Moscow's State Historical Museum, Ulyanov claims that their maternal grandfather was a Ukrainian Jew who converted to Christianity to avoid the compulsory resettlement to the area reserved for the Jews and to study. "He originated from a poor Jewish family and he was the son of Moses Blank, originating from (western-Ukrainian) Zhytomyr”, Ulyanov wrote to Soviet leader Joseph Stalin. (see http://relax.lidovky.cz/vudce-revoluce-lenin-byl-zid-dokazuje-dopis-jeho-sestry-pjh-/zajimavosti.aspx?c=A110524_093101_ln-zajimavosti_pks ), Joseph Stalin was of Georgian origin, thus he originated from the Russian Caucasus region, which has been the centre of Mongolia-Tatar State Golden Horde in the past, Stalin was directed in his politics in Russia literally by the above three basic laws of Mongolian warriors: not to betray your Khan (punished with death regularly also of family members of traitor), to fight against the enemy until the end and the prohibition of killing women and children. After the death of Lenin Stalin dominated the Communist movement in Russia, however, although Stalin killed a large number of his opponents, so he did not kill on principle their women and children, to the Russian concentration camps the Gulags only hostile adult men were sent by Stalin, whether Russians, Germans or other nationalities. The children of these Russian enemies in Russia Stalin sent to State children's homes, on principle for re-education. The same procedure was applied by Stalin to the German Nazis or to their servants from other nations on the by Russians conquered Nazi territories, the hostile adult men were killed in a large amount after the conquest of their territories by the Russians, their women were raped in a large amount by Russian soldiers, which resulted apparently in a number of German children from these mixed sexual relations, and then, that nowadays the hatred between the Germans and the Russians is no longer a big problem, it is rather about friendship, see above, for example. German Chancellor Angela Merkel often acts as a mediator in power and murderous war conflicts between the Russia and the Western allies, at the present time the example was her negotiating of cessation of fighting in the murderous civil war in Ukraine. Nazi Germany conquered the whole Western Europe, until it failed in the attempt to conquer the Stalin's Communist Soviet Russia, also the former Russian enemies the United Kingdom and the United States joined the Soviet Russia during the Second World War, then together they defeated Nazi Germany.

 

During The Second World War in concentration camps about 5.2 million Jews, including women and children were killed by Nazi Germany. after their disaster in the context of The Second World War the Jews continue to insist on their ideology based on Jewish religion in ancient times, that the world is ruled by the predation, i.e. not by love, the charity. The Jews have applied this their ideology to their repeated return to and domination over Israel and Palestine in a murderous conquest war against the local Palestinians, who are partly members of Christianity and in the majority the members of a similar Islam ideology about the government of predation  in the world. In addition insisting on their ideology based on Jewish religion in ancient times, that the world is ruled by the predation, i.e. not by love, the charity, after The Second World War the Jews, who are represented at present time in above average amount among managers in the West, applied to massive restoration of the expansion of agricultural slaughter factory farms in the West torturing and killing animals – contemporary concentration camps of animals. In addition insisting on their ideology based on Jewish religion in ancient times, that the world is ruled by the predation, i.e. not by love, the charity, the Jews applied to their insisting on heresy of Jesus of Nazareth from the perspective of the Jewish religion, which has resulted in that the Jews, who converted to Christianity, cannot obtain citizenship in the modern Jewish State of Israel, and it is unlike eg. Jewish atheists.

 

The result of rivalry of predatory ideology of Judaism and of predatory ideology of Islam and of predatory Christian West, which under the influence of Judaism and its ideological liberation struggle of Jews from the Christian medieval slavery lost or never had in the vast majority the Christian belief, that the world is ruled by love, i.e. charity, is, that the world stands on verge of a murderous nuclear war, which can exterminate all humanity with a significant probability because of the mass destructiveness of nuclear weapons, at present time it is apparently mainly due to the conflict in Israel and Palestine between on the one hand predatory orthodox Islamic States, which are trying to acquire nuclear weapons and to reconquer the territory of Israel and Palestine in the murderous war, and on the other hand predatory contemporary Jewish State Israel and the predatory Jewish and Christian West, both owning nuclear weapons, where both are not able to cope Muslims at the birth rate, combativeness, willingness to die on the battlefield while as a result of progress of science and of civilization the Western and Jewish population becomes effeminate and it is gradually dying out naturally.

 

Summary: This basic pattern according to charitylogy as the science about love, i.e. about charity according to the Philosophy of Balance used by me for understanding and commentary of the history of the three great related world religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam can easily be viewed as follows: Eg. if the mother member of the Christian church or atheistic mother, if both believe in mercy and Christian love (i.e. charity) and they speak to her child, that the world is governed by mercy or Christian love (i.e. charity), and that her son or daughter should therefore also be merciful, so these mother must expect from a significant part of her offspring eg. such a response, mother, yesterday I saw the cat as it caught live mouse, at first the cat tortured it (i.e. playing with it), then the cat killed and ate it, and mother, you eat and you give us to eat the meat of animals which are tortured and killed in slaughter agricultural factory farms (eg. after birth in these factory farms there is denied freedom of movement of  animals not to lose weight, these animals are fed by drugs to quickly get fatter, and shortly after birth, often as pups or shortly after reaching adulthood these animals are killed), mother, we have to believe you, that the nature or world are governed by mercy or Christian love, i.e. charity and not by predation, mother, you lie us and on the basis of this reasoning a large proportion of these children will choose the predation as their religion, whether in the form of Islam, Judaism or they become hypocritical predatory Christians or predatory Hindus or predatory atheists or they believe Darwinism, and they will not believe that the world or nature are governed by mercy or Christian love (i.e. charity), or by God who should be mercy or Christian love (i.e. charity). On the contrary Jewish or Muslim mother would answer to her aforementioned daughter or son apparently according to Judaism or Islam, that being predatory or a predator is absolutely right, that her son or daughter should be merciful or charitable only to their friends and against other living creatures, especially against other humans, other animals and other plants he or she must throughout his or her life in the world to fight to the death as a predator until he or she joins them to his or her pack, kills them or enslaves them, as do such predatory wolves, which are merciful or charitable only to members of their own pack of wolves and against other living creatures, especially against prey or against other wolf packs they must fight to the death. This opinion of domination of predation in the world on the above question of charity or predation of the world based on Judaism or Islam is controversial according to the Philosophy of Balance again, although this opinion of Judaism or Islam can sound reasonable, because it largely coincides with the experience of all living creatures, but according to the Philosophy of Balance all children, all mothers, as well as well as all fathers or all other men and all other living creatures never fully accept domination of predation in the world, even if it contradicted an irrefutable proof of reason, which has not been given yet, because according to the Philosophy of Balance all living creatures in fact feel that they very dislike the domination of predation in the world (i.e. it is very contrary to their emotions) and they are in fact very unwilling it (i.e. it is very contrary to their will). With the advent of modern era there was also a decline of Christianity in Europe, the development of secular natural and social sciences, and with it the liberation of the Jews from Christian slavery in Europe. According to the Philosophy of Balance the cause of the decline of Christianity was, that Christianity as Jesus' religion of love, i.e. of charity-caritas has ceased and perhaps never was credible for people, in the modern era the inhabitants of the West have begun to substitute it increasingly by philosophy of predation, for example by Darwinism, by which they began to approach the worldview advocated by Islam and Judaism, although many Jews were very attracted by Jesus' religion of love, i.e. of charity. The reason for this incredibility was mainly, that people saw, that mutual predation and not mutual love (i.e. charity) rules among people and animals and plants in the wild or in a world, and people did not understand, why in this situation they should believe church, whose priests claimed, that love, i.e. charity rules over nature or the world, especially when Christians themselves behaved predominantly and continue to behave predominantly in their factual conduct so, as if predation rules over the world (but as a Christian I rather hope according to the Bible King James Version (KJV), Matthew 16, 15 He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? 16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. 17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. 18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.). The result of rivalry of predatory ideology of Judaism and of predatory ideology of Islam and of predatory Christian West, which under the influence of Judaism and its ideological liberation struggle of Jews from the Christian medieval slavery lost in the vast majority the Christian belief, that the world is ruled by love, i.e. charity, is, that the world stands on verge of a murderous nuclear war, which can exterminate all humanity with a significant probability because of the mass destructiveness of nuclear weapons, at present time it is apparently mainly due to the conflict in Israel and Palestine between on the one hand predatory orthodox Islamic States, which are trying to acquire nuclear weapons and to reconquer the territory of Israel and Palestine in the murderous war, and on the other hand predatory contemporary Jewish State Israel and the predatory Jewish and Christian West, both owning nuclear weapons, where both are not able to cope Muslims at the birth rate, combativeness, willingness to die on the battlefield while as a result of progress of science and of civilization the Western and Jewish population becomes effeminate and it is gradually dying out naturally.

 

6) 25/03/2016 Does man's brain govern over his sperm cells or do his sperm cells govern over his brain?

For the man's sperm cells is typical fight or predation, after penetration of sperm cells into the woman's vagina these sperm cells are competing, which initially penetrates the woman's mature egg in the uterus and it fertilizes the egg, only this single sperm cell of current about 50 million sperm cells in a man's ejaculate survives and it becomes the basis for a new human embryo, other sperm cells of this number die in a woman's vagina no later than in few days. By contrast the human brain tries to convince the world, all living creatures and even the body (i.e. organism) of a man, that the world is governed by charity, including sex cells of a man, i.e. sperm cells, the brain of a man has for this proof of charity in relation to all living cells of a man's organism, including sperm cells quite a long time, the success or unsuccess of this brain activity shows in the decisive moment of fertilization of a woman's mature egg in the womb when the man's and woman's sexual intercourse, if during this sexual act among sperm cells in their aforementioned fight for survival, in which on principle only one of current about 50 million sperm cells of one current man's ejaculate can win from the reasons stated above, the unmerciful predation or partial or complete charity or cooperation reigns in the fight of all competing sperm cells for life and death, virtually for fertilization of a woman's on principle single mature egg in the uterus. Nearly all previous world philosophies, which on principle are fruits of current man's brain, would fail in this proof of charity in relation to sperm cells, if there was fight of sperm cells of the man's ejaculate in the woman's vagina for survival, virtually fertilization of woman's mature on principle single egg, apparently very quickly, sooner or later these sperm cells would reject nearly all existing world philosophy of charity and they would fight unmercifully to save its life as predators, i.e. each sperm cell against each sperm cell, in this fight of sperm cells for survival the most predatory sperm cell would win nearly always, possibly entirely always, according to Christianity in connection with Rational Mystique of my Philosophy of Balance the most predatory sperm cell embodies and always embodied the Biblical Devil, according to Christianity the exception was possibly Jesus of Nazareth, who according to Catholic theology was born from Mary, who remained virgin also after his conception with God the father, therefore Jesus of Nazareth was not perhaps conceived from the above fight of sperm cells for life and death and Jesus of Nazareth, who according Christianity is the single existing Godman, has apparently never conceived any child. Against these previous apparently nearly all on principle masculine imperfect (i.e. philosophies of charity in the decisive moment of fertilization of woman's eggs defeated by philosophies of predation on the side of male sperm cells, perhaps with the exception of possibly only partly in its original state kept the philosophy of charity of Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ in teaching of his followers) philosophies of charity I want to suggest the Philosophy of Balance based on a minimum of 51% on the current concept of philosophy of charity of Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ. In my practical experience the fighting ability or predation of man, virtually fighting ability or predation of man's certain sperm cell is not mostly decisive for the attractiveness of certain man for women, although on principle she hides it much from him, virtually for fertilization of her egg, although the majority of men or by extension possibly even majority of his sperm cells apparently think it, but their charity, these two properties are evolutionarily necessary in men to protect not only strong but also and especially weak joint offspring of the certain man and his wife. In other words from a biological point of view not only sperm cells of man compete to fertilize the woman's egg, but also microorganisms, especially living cells of the woman's body choose one from these competing sperm cells, which will be successful in this fight and those which on the contrary these microorganisms of woman's body will kill, then for the above reasons in this selection the microorganisms of woman's body do not apparently mostly value fighting ability or predation of certain single sperm cell but its charity, although fighting ability of this certain sperm cell is also very important.

7) 04/04/2016 Commentary of Biblical Book of Job according to the Philosophy of Balance and fictitious letter of Lord to contemporary suffering Job according to the Philosophy of Balance about the reason of his suffering.

My friend,

 

at present time you are in a situation like the biblical Job and I as one of his friends, who came to him to give comfort to him, but finally they verbally attacked him, but then the God saved and rewarded the suffering Job and the God condemned and punished his friends, that is why I am sending you the following comment of the book of Job according to the Philosophy of Balance and I hope that it will help you and that the God will not condemn and punish me for it as above Job's friends. The following is my personal life experience, when I myself found in the situation of Biblical Job and I have saved my life with my sole long-term reliance on charity as defined below up to now and I have gotten gradually more, see below.

 

(Summary of the Biblical book of job: Job 1: 3 His substance also was seven thousand sheep, and three thousand camels, and five hundred yoke of oxen, and five hundred she asses, and a very great household; so that this man was the greatest of all the men of the east. 13 And there was a day when his sons and his daughters were eating and drinking wine in their eldest brother's house: 14 And there came a messenger unto Job, and said, The oxen were plowing, and the asses feeding beside them: 15 And the Sabeans fell upon them, and took them away; yea, they have slain the servants with the edge of the sword; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee. 16 While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, The fire of God is fallen from heaven, and hath burned up the sheep, and the servants, and consumed them; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee. 17 While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, The Chaldeans made out three bands, and fell upon the camels, and have carried them away, yea, and slain the servants with the edge of the sword; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee. 18 While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, Thy sons and thy daughters were eating and drinking wine in their eldest brother's house: 19 And, behold, there came a great wind from the wilderness, and smote the four corners of the house, and it fell upon the young men, and they are dead; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee. Job 2: 1 Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the Lord. 4 And Satan answered the Lord, and said, Skin for skin, yea, all that a man hath will he give for his life. 5 But put forth thine hand now, and touch his bone and his flesh, and he will curse thee to thy face. 6 And the Lord said unto Satan, Behold, he is in thine hand; but save his life. 7 So went Satan forth from the presence of the Lord, and smote Job with sore boils from the sole of his foot unto his crown. 8 And he took him a potsherd to scrape himself withal; and he sat down among the ashes. 9 Then said his wife unto him, Dost thou still retain thine integrity? curse God, and die. )

 

A fictional letter of Lord to today's Job according to the Philosophy of Balance:

 

Jób (at present time),

 

I do not want to host too you, that does not increase my and your responsibility for reasons of revenge (This does not probably concern Jesus of Nazareth apparently Christ, because he did not die martyred on the cross as a result of revenge for his mistakes, because, if Jesus of Nazareth apparently Christ was identical with the God, who is the charity, so he could not apparently commit any sin or mistake against this God, i.e. charity, then Jesus of Nazareth apparently Christ died tortured as a result of his compassion with the suffering ones that this God showed to them that their suffering has meaning and that the God does not only allow it for living creatures, but He himself is willing and able to bear personally it. The counter-argument, that Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ ate the lamb at least at Easter dinner, thus young sheep killed cruelly for him, by which he would have caused a great death and pain of this baby and its parents and of other its relatives, and at least these animals will never consider him as only one God, who should be the charity, is questionable at least because of the following Biblical quote from the Gospel of John: John 4, 31 In the mean while his disciples prayed him, saying, Master, eat. 32 But he said unto them, I have meat to eat that ye know not of. 33 Therefore said the disciples one to another, Hath any man brought him ought to eat? 34 Jesus saith unto them, My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work.) especially of the animals (and of their living cells and of their related micro-organisms which according to exact, i.e. measurable scientific hypothesis of my Philosophy of Balance are able to recognize and remember, for example by saving in their genetic code, their friend and enemy, in particular within the coordination of these micro-organisms, especially of the living cells in the body, virtually organism of a living creature) tortured and cruelly killed in contemporary agricultural slaughter factory farms for your or of your ancestors or descendants (whose body each of about 60 trillion living cells has with you partially identical genetic code according to exact science, e.g. each of about 60 trillion living cells of the body of your parent or of your child has half - identical genetic code with each of about 60 trillion cells in your body, therefore according to the above exact scientific hypotheses of my Philosophy of Balance about the ability of living micro-organisms to recognize and remember their enemy and friend, if the living cells of the body of any living creature consider living cells in your body as the enemy or friend, so they will consider living cells of the body of your child as the enemy or friend in half way, in other words according to this exact scientific hypotheses of my Philosophy of Balance it is the reason why hatred of living creatures is transmitted from the parents on their offspring, according to the Bible probably until the fourth generation, and also the reason why the friendship of living creatures is transmitted from parents on their offspring, according to the Bible apparently until countless generations) eating unmerciful foods, such as their slaughtered meat, loaf of bread, which on principle is of the wheat, costs approximately 30 CZK, if according to my Philosophy of Balance you eat the most merciful foods, causing the least possible death and pain, i.e. from your so merciful diet as much as possible plant fruits and plant seeds as the people in the biblical paradise and products exclusively from them or, if necessary, in the least possible amount also my naturally dead (on principle of old age) carrions of animals on principle after autopsy of the vet and boiled in several waters, so according to my Philosophy of Balance your income should increase and you should avert (because in the course of time the living cells and by them formed living creatures will forget their hatred, virtually they will save you in their genetic information as a friend, i.e. not as the enemy, i.e. according to the exact sciences all living cells in your body will gradually be changed, and on principle it is with the exception of nerve cells, in other words sinful or erroneous living cells of your body will be changed for the just living cells in your body) also your other punishments (such as illness, persecution, etc.) for your mistakes (which however according to the Philosophy of Balance are without your guilt, because they are caused by imperfection of your brain, which however according to contemporary exact science is probably objectively given for example by nature  /by the God according to a religion /, virtually by you from outside uncontrollable internal connection of about 100 billion cells in your brain, and it will be after the initial crisis, which however you do not have to survive, if you start to change too late /the sooner you will start to fulfill the permanent obligation of each according to the Philosophy of Balance causing the least possible death and pain, the greater chance for rescue you will have/, deriving from the fact that your enemies will think that you are mentally or physically weaker and, therefore finally it will be time for their revenge for your errors, i.e. according to the Philosophy of Balance on principle for by you caused much more than the least possible death and pain, in your case apparently especially of living creatures other than humans, especially animals, see above)

 

Note, below I present quotes from the Bible-Gospels, on which the above mentioned claims of the Philosophy of Balance are based:

 

Matthew 13King James Version (KJV)

 

Matthew 25King James Version (KJV)

 

Mark 4King James Version (KJV)

 

Luke 8King James Version (KJV)

 

8) 04/03/2016 Question of dualism of good and evil in a world from the point of view of charitylogy.

Does good or evil, virtually charity or predation govern, virtually reign over a world? I define charity as still not-causing more than the least possible death and pain with the supreme aim to live in the future in a world, where everyone likes each other. I define predation as the intentional causing death and pain, both the least possible both death and pain and more, also much more than the least possible both death and pain. To that question there are the following logical answers: 1) Sovereign ruler of a world is exclusively that charity (thus for example only one God as exclusively that charity). 2) Sovereign ruler of a world is exclusively that predation (thus for example Devil as both only one God and exclusively that predation). 3) Sovereign ruler of a world are exclusively both that charity and that predation (thus for example world is governed exclusively by both God as exclusively that charity and Devil as exclusively that predation). 4) Sovereign ruler of a world is partly that charity (thus for example god as exclusively that charity is only one of more gods). 5) Sovereign ruler of a world is partly that predation (thus for example Devil as exclusively that predation is only one of more gods). 6) Sovereign ruler of a world is neither that charity nor that predation (thus for example both that charity and that predation, virtually both that good and that evil do not exist, or only one God is neither that charity nor that predation).

9) 16/04/2016 Idolatry.

How can Satan make from only one God a mere idol or image or object and to subordinate it and to misuse it to great evil action, thus according to the Philosophy of Balance to cause much more than the least possible death and pain. Examples include Nazis. The German Wehrmacht had in outfit of their soldiers on the belt the motto "Gott mit uns", that is translated into English "God with us", they could write as well there "Jesus of Nazareth with us," as it campaigned for example Medieval Catholic Crusaders or medieval Roman Catholic Inquisition. According to the Bible's New Testament the only one God is identical to charity. Misuse in the same way of the word “charity” is apparently very difficult or at present even completely impossible, if for example above mentioned Nazi soldiers of Wehrmacht had on the belt the motto "charity with us," not "God with us", as well as Catholic crusaders or the Roman Catholic Inquisition, so they should have hardly beatable, if not at present unbeatable barriers to commit war crimes as such especially killing of defenseless women and children, as the above mentioned Wehrmacht soldiers during World war II, or in the Middle Ages both Catholic crusaders and the Roman Catholic inquisitors did it in a large amount. Although in the past the above mentioned misuse of the word “love” has already occurred, in Latin in ancient Rome there was originally used the word "amor" for the word “love”, then one of the many gods of Roman polytheism was called by the word "Amor" or by in English "love" by the ancient Romans, then this ancient Roman god of love Amor acquired rather the meaning as a sex god, who included and approved or recommended also various sexual deviations like pedophile or homosexual sex, which later in ancient Rome were numerous and socially recommended ways of sex. Therefore, when St. Jerome translated the Biblical New Testament (so called Vulgate) into Latin in the 4th-5th Century AD (anno Domini) the phrase from the Bible, New Testament, 1 John 4, "8 He that loveth not, knoweth not God, for God is love." in his Latin Vulgate Joannis I „4:8 qui non diligit non novit Deum quoniam Deus caritas est“, so he did not use in ancient Rome largely discredited Latin word "amor" for the word "love", but he created for this word “love”, which should be Biblical only one God (see above), in Latin entirely new word "caritas" in English "charity" (derived from the Latin "carum, caro", i.e. in English "dear"or "valuable", in French “cher”, in Italian “caro”). According to me with knowledge of this historical experience the above mentioned word love in the sense of "caritas" or "charity" is in practice inmisapplicable by Satan.

 

Literature: http://janbarton.blog.idnes.cz/blog.aspx?c=441864 , http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=John1&no=4 , https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+John+4&version=GNV , http://vulsearch.sourceforge.net/html/1Jo.html , https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulgata , http://www.vira.cz/otazky/Caritas-vyznam-slova.html

10) 16/04/2016 Psychoanalysis Freud versus Jung.

My friend,

 

I see your main contemporary problem as your answer to the following question:

 

Should an Orthodox Roman Catholic still try to defeat the Devil in the sense, if this Catholic should permanently try to kill the Devil (here the word "defeat" means the English word "slaughter") or this Catholic should permanently try only to win over the Devil and to subjugate this Devil (the word "defeat" means here English word "defeat" in the narrower sense).

 

Regarding this question according to my Philosophy of Balance according to me these Jesus' words in the Gospels are valid: "Love your enemies" in Matthew 5, 44, Luke 6, 27, Luke 6, 35, i.e. according to the Philosophy of Balance the correct answer to the above mentioned question is: "It is permanently necessary to win over the Devil and to subjugate him  (i.e. It is right to translate the word "defeat" in English by the word "defeat" in the narrower sense), and it is not right to want to kill this Devil once and for all, possibly even to torture him, as he tortured Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ on the cross (i.e. It is not right to translate the word "defeat" in English by the word "slaughter").

 

To kill the Devil (e.g. in myself), it is not in accordance either with the psychology of Carl Gustav Jung (see by Jung's psychology inspired book of Anselmo Gruna Jak zacházet se zlým/ How to deal with evil, with the subtitle Boj s démony ve starém mnišství/ Fighting with the demons in the old monasticism, Carmelite publishing house, Kostelní Vydří, 1995), nor with the psychology of Sigmund Freud (according to whom all mental diseases are caused by sexual deviations and all physical diseases are caused by these mental diseases, it is so called Freud's term of "Psychosomatic Medicine"). The aim of Philosophy of Balance is not to destroy the sexual organs in favour of the brain, or to subordinate the brain to the sexual organs, how there was this latter mentioned apparently in Freud's psychology, but that the sexual organs voluntarily subordinate to the brain, how it tried Jung (see apparently Jung's parable about the evil as the angry dogs, which we should not kill or imprison in the subconscious or in the unconscious psyche, but we should try to educate them mercifully and to integrate them into our psyche). This corresponds to the Jung's teaching but apparently not to Jung's practical life, according to Freud's critics Jung and his disciples had often sex with their mentally ill by Jung and his disciples treated rich woman clients, they made from them their mistresses and subsequently psychologists, virtually Jungian psycho-analysts, by which they did not often heal them, but they mentally hurt even more them. (see http://www.knihovnice.cz/recenze/noll-r-carl-gustav-jung-tajny-life-arijsky-Christ. HTML , Published by Triton in 2002. Now in 2006 a reprint with a new cover and the amended name: “Carl Gustav Jung-the secret life-Aryan Christ” is published.)

 

The text of the Philosophy of Balance in relation to this question is following:

 

quoted:


Post of Dalibor Gruza

 

I had schizophrenic thoughts at my age of 20, that one of my relatives is the Devil and I have to kill him or her, after a long mental struggle I came to a conclusion, that, even if my relative is the Devil, so he or she is and always will be my relative and I like him or her and I cannot kill him or her.

 

The only dogma or axiom or only underlying true of my Philosophy of Balance is:

 

"All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." All the rest consists more in views (speculations). It applies to all my Philosophy of Balance.

 

The question is what would happen if we would kill all death or Devil, if we would also get rid of all the pain at the same time. As to me not, so I admit my mistake in my speculations in my Philosophy of Balance, that mental pain means only a death of neurons in the brain. In my opinion mental pain can also take the form of progressively more and more inexorable stupidity, so a living creature loses its acquired knowledge. In my opinion this loss of knowledge has not only a form of death of living cells, but it can also take the form of weight loss, up to the level of photons. Knowledge or data of the reason of an individual are in fact stored in the mass and the reduce of this depositing mass may be resulting to reduce the size of the data from a large amount of data (formed according to the programmers 1-ones and 0-zeros or two different bits of binary computer code or alternating light and dark, photons and vacuum) to the exclusive photons or exclusive vacuum so complete ignorance.

 

In other words, if we kill the Devil, or death, or annihilate the vacuum, we will achieve eternal life, while those without the pain from death of living creatures, but with the growing hunger of individuals, because they will not have enough to eat (food for living creatures is always dead bodies of living creatures), it is a weight loss of these individuals and the inevitable gradual loss of all their knowledge stored in the mass loosen by weight lost, the gradual and unstoppable loss of mass of all living creatures, accompanied by their weight loss up to the level of photons will mean their immense psychological pain.

 

In view of the Universe an annihilation of vacuum will probably appear as the entropy of the Universe, i.e. its conversion into the Universe uniformly infinitely expanded by mash consisting of light consisting of photons, because according to my Philosophy of Balance the attractive, especially gravitational forces in the Universe are based on vacuum underpressure, which thus causes the formation of massive objects in the Universe and cohesion of the entire Universe.

 

Before the emergence of our Universe before the Big Bang here was obviously vice versa the annihilation of all the light in the Universe apparently by its expansion (see above) and its exclusive filling by the absolute vacuum, i.e. figuratively speaking, killing and death of God at the hands of the Devil. The result was similar loss of all knowledge of the Devil, whose mind was filled exclusively with zeros, thus by a vacuum without a single photon of light, but only zeros cannot capture and store any idea or any information or data. Then there was the immense mental suffering of the Devil, to who the God gave apparently in the Big Bang at the beginning of our Universe once again a photon of light with great energy. Subsequently, through the influence of ambient vacuum underpressure apparently the expansion of this photon occurs and continues in the form of expansion of our Universe. It seems to be in my Philosophy of Balance mentioned crash of the absolute vacuum and light, which stood at the birth of our Universe in the Big Bang. Philosophy of Balance p. 396


 

According to me your problems are based on the fact, that you either murdered in the past your neighbour, whom you considered as the Devil, or you are at present time or you will be in the future ready to kill, possibly to torture before it (as Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ they tortured on the cross) your neighbour, whom you consider as the Devil.

 

Furthermore next text of the philosophy of balance in relation to these problems:

 

quoted:


Post of Dalibor Gruza

 

Note: The series "Once Upon a Time … Life" (see Literature) 3 DVD, Part 9 "The Brain", time 2:30 to 3:55, 200 million years ago evolved a primitive brain, i.e. reptiles cortex-archicortex, allowing primitive aggressive reactions such as territorial defense, these primitive reactions and this part of the brain are also at modern human, 100 million years ago, it was paleocortex (i.e. cerebral cortex of mammals see 1 DVD, Part 1 "Cells – Their Amazing Story", time 4:48 to 5:06) getting over fear, the beginnings of memory, time 4:10-5:48, 100,000 years ago it was the neocortex comprising 85% weight of the brain allowing the sharing of ideas, counting, art, thinking about the causes and to act in civilized manner, and the problem of communication of neocortex and primitive cerebral cortex (archicortex and paleocortex), time 23:30-25:50, the brain has more or less complete control over man, communication of neocortex and the primitive cerebral cortex (archicortex and paleocortex) causes the eternal dilemma between aggressive and civilized solution of the situation by living creature, primitive part of the brain is still trying to prevail. The brain stores most, of what we perceive consciously, from what we perceive unconsciously, the brain stores about 1/100, the brain perceives everything at once. Each body part is controlled by certain area of the brain, larger parts of the brain are needed for more sensitive body parts such as hands and face. Transfer to the brain is mediated through surface cells of the body and its senses and through the nerves, virtually their nerve cells, neurons and their dendrites dispersed throughout the body, using chemical neurotransmitters. Literature: "Once Upon a Time … Life",  the original: "Il était une fois ... la vie", created by Albert Barillé, Music Composed by Michel Legrand, characters designed by: Jean Barbaud, copyright Procidis-Paris, the Czech Republic copyright: BH promo CZ 2008, title song of Jane Mařasová, Ľuba, 1,2,4,5 DVD 104 minutes, 3, 6 DVD 130 minutes, 26 episodes of the series. Philosophy of Balance p. 413


 

11) 17/04/2016 End of the Universe, nuclear war on Earth, and the general relativity theory of Albert Einstein according to Philosophy of Balance.

The contemporary exact physics generally accepts the fact, that since its formation the Universe is expanding, which was discovered by physics on the basis that all cosmic objects are moving away in all directions from the Earth, which was determined by physics on the basis of observation of so called cosmic background radiation, which should be unchanged from the beginning of the Universe, and on the basis of observation of so called Doppler effect of waves in the Universe (i.e. at the movement of the source of the waves against an observer or conversely their relative speed is changing and so either by the sum or by the difference of their speed, thereby derived quantities such as wave length and frequency of waves are changing). By solving the equations of the general relativity theory by Alexander Friedmann then these equations implies that the Universe either shrinks or expands, or that in the Universe there cannot be the equilibrium state when the Universe is at rest. But even Einstein's general relativity theory is not generally accepted by physics, because Einstein flirted with the idea of ​​introducing into the equations of general relativity theory so called cosmological constant for a long time, however after Hubble discovery of the expansion of the Universe Einstein said that the introduction of non-zero cosmological constant was "the greatest mistake of his life", however according to some physicists in the contemporary situation the re-introduction of non-zero cosmological constant could be literally said rescue belt for the big Bang theory by the fact that a non-zero cosmological constant is inherently arbitrary, so it is possible to select its value in order to remove the discrepancy between the age of objects in the Universe and the age of the universe derived from Hubble's constant, it is naturally not a particularly elegant solution, but it is not entirely inconceivable, that the biggest Einstein's life mistake was just his statement about life's greatest mistake (see the book of the most famous Czech astrophysicist and also Catholic Jiri Grygar - věda a víra (in English “science and faith”, written for the revue of the Czech Christian Academy UNIVERSUM 24/02/1996,  see www.vira.cz/Texty/Knihovna/Velky-tresk-krize-teorie.html ). Furthermore according to contemporary exact physical theory of the end of the Universe implying its thermal death, thus a high entropy characterized by low capacity of the Universe as a physical system to do the physically defined work, so as a result of expansion, dilution and the temperature drops to 0 Kelvin in Universe it would not be possible to obtain any organized form (change) of energy, in other words it would mean the end of life in the Universe, therefore that any evolution of the Universe is directed towards its extinction. On the question, if the Universe ends in the big crash, virtually in return of the Universe to a single point, from which it should expand from the beginning, or conversely the Universe ends in the above mentioned entropy, virtually in its infinite expansion, thus contemporary physics does not give a clear answer. According to the Philosophy of Balance the mass of the Universe is composed exclusively by waves of the speed of light and by vacuum, namely the mass is apparently decomposed into these two components during its perfect burning, then in our Universe the waves of the speed of light cause apparently its expansion and vacuum by its underpressure the attraction or gravity of our Universe again, so according to the Philosophy of Balance the problem of end of the Universe could be simplified by the question, if in the world (i.e. in our Universe and also in other possible universes) there are more waves of speed of light or there is more vacuum. However according to contemporary exact physics it is also not clear, if in the Universe there is generally any absolute vacuum, virtually pure nothing, of which observation were never realized by contemporary exact physics in the Universe up to now. This problem is also solved by using the most modern particle accelerators (eg. see European Laboratory for Particle Physics, which is also known by the acronym CERN, in French “Conseil Européen pour la recherche nucléaire”), which is trying to discover indivisible smallest particle by means of physical experiments, according to physical observation the Higgs boson is possibly this up to now discovered smallest particle, however according to contemporary exact physical theory the two-dimensional strings could also be it, however the practical experience is at present, that up to now the physicists always succeeded in dividing of each allegedly smallest particle of mass into still smaller particle again and again, although they often thought that they already discovered the smallest indivisible particle at a certain moment of the contemporary development of physics (see eg. particle as the atom, of which name comes from ancient Greek atomist philosophy, Greek word “ἄτομος, átomos” originally means indivisible in Greek language, however for a relatively long time in exact physics also one of discovered microparticles named by physicists “atom” is not the smallest indivisible particle, but it has kept this name up to now). If the exact physics discovers the smallest indivisible particle, then it will apparently be possible to calculate future development or the end of the Universe, to determine, if in the Universe there are more waves of the speed of light or more vacuum, and to determine the nature of this vacuum. According to the Philosophy of Balance based mostly on the Biblical New Testament it is apparently more probable, that vacuum is the final number of single points of space-time of lower speed than the speed of light and of a zero relativistic mass spreaded out  in space-time, for observation of this point of space-time it would be necessary perfectly infinite division of certain material thing (perfect infinity can be increased no longer, virtually perfect zero can be divided no longer, perfect infinity is the opposite of perfect zero, perfect zero is not for example zero meters but zero of all units, i.e. things because zero meters mean the absence only of metric units and it admits the presence of other units, i.e. things such as geometric points of zero-dimension space, zero meters or unit zero is not perfect nothing, thus not perfect zero), perfect infinity should be countable probably by Biblical only one God, if he exists, and then Biblical Satan was created by this God as the above mentioned single point of space-time or the more with end numerous points of space-time and the perfect zero as perfect nothing does not exist in world (i.e. according to the Catholic faith the Biblical only one God should be omnipresent, thus present also in this Satan, who is always subordinated to this God as one of the sons of this God, see the Biblical Book of Job (Bible, Job 2,1), or as obedient or rebellious servant (Bible, Job 2,1 and Job 2,6), i.e. angel of this God, see Biblical Book of Job and the Biblical New Testament, nor Satan nor this God can be apparently never reached by living creatures, and these both God and Satan can apparently be reached only by Biblical only one God, if he exists in some way). In other words to determine, if in the Universe there are more waves of speed of light or there is more vacuum, the exact physicists – living creatures will apparently never entirely succeed in it, and the Biblical only one God will apparently never completely show them it, because firstly all living creatures will apparently never completely believe this God in this his statement and secondly, even if all living creatures believed this God in this his statement in spite of it, then it would apparently be no place for faith, but everything would become calculable (i.e. countable, i.e. rational), and for this reason nor Satan will apparently never reveal to all living creatures the truth about it and living creatures are not apparently able to detect all mistakes of Satan in their rational model of the world and rationally completely to prove the existence or non-existence of Biblical only one God as the embodiment of perfect infinity or to reach a perfect zero when dividing mass. According to the Philosophy of Balance is the knowledge, if in the Universe there are more waves of speed of light or there is more vacuum possible only indirectly, that in our life either we will rely mainly on charity (i.e. on the balance between waves of speed of light and vacuum in the Universe), which should be the only one God, or otherwise we will have apparently ultimately to rely mainly on predation, i.e. on more than the least possible nihilation (i.e. on imbalance between waves of speed of light and vacuum in the Universe), nothing or vacuum could be Satan and Satan would be identical with the Biblical only one God for example in this latter mentioned way. This indirect knowledge is so apparently possible only according to that, if charity or conversely predation proves to us to be more successful in our lives in the long term, by which we will indirectly prove the balance or conversely imbalance of waves of speed of light and of vacuum in the Universe. In other words, if it is not possible to count up, if in the Universe there are more waves of speed of light or there is more vacuum, it is not apparently also possible, that living creatures themselves determined rationally with sureness, if the Universe ends in the above mentioned big crash or in the above mentioned total entropy. According to the Philosophy of Balance based mostly on the Biblical New Testament there is also the third possibility, that in the future the balance between waves of speed of light and of vacuum will be gradually more and more established in the Universe apparently in perfectly infinite time, thus, that in the long term the most powerful law of the Universe is charity, virtually organized movement of all waves of speed of light and of all vacuum nearly without collisions, it is in other words, that in the future the world will not end in nuclear war and that in the future we will succeed by forces of all living beings in restoration or in first reaching of the Biblical paradise in the world, i.e. in reaching of the world, where everyone (especially all living creatures) likes each other, and therefore  everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain (see the single dogma of my Philosophy of Balance), but also this will never apparently be possible to count rationally completely with sureness by any living creature, it will apparently still remain here some place for faith of living creatures (in the words of the Biblical Gospel of Matthew 25, 1Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom. ... 13 Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.)

12) 25/04/2016 Beginning of salvation or the end of the world in the presidential elections in present-day Austria according to the Philosophy of Balance. Nazism as a result of Christian and Jewish heresy?

In the first round of the presidential election in Austria became (the first two) winners the heir of the ideas of German Nazism „the candidate of the right-wing populist Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) Norbert Hofer, he was supported by 36.4 percent of voters, and former chairman of the Green Party Alexander Van der Bellen, who won 20.4 percent of votes, representatives of the government parties suffered a debacle: candidate of the Chancellor Werner Faymann 's Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) Rudolf Hundstorfer and the candidate of the (its Christian) coalition People's Party (ÖVP) Andreas Khol gain both each just 11.2 percent of the votes.  Both (i.e. Norbert Hofer and Alexander Van der Bellen) will compete in the second round on 22nd May“. 2016 (see http://www.novinky.cz/zahranicni/evropa/401427-hofer-necekane-zvitezil-v-prvnim-kole-prezidetskych-voleb-v-rakousku.html ) According to me in the present days  here there is fundamental ideological conflict in contemporary purest ideological form, so battle between charity and predation. German Nazism, which originated also among others from Austria and whose leader was an Austrian citizen Adolf Hitler, was in fact in the past a political party, that established the most advanced protection of animals and of nature that have ever been enacted in Europe. In other words now even Adolf Hitler himself embodying apparently in the present days  Austria should decide in presidential elections in Austria, if he chooses, what in his soul there was Caritas (i.e. charity), or contrarily, what in his soul there was predation,  thus, if he votes for the Green Party or contrarily for the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ), which is apparently at least partly Nazi, and one could say, that now even Adolf Hitler himself should decide, if party of charity, i.e. of goodness will prevail in him or contrarily predation and evil, in other words, if Adolf Hitler as predator should serve the charity or contrarily the charity in him should serve predation, or in other words, if Satan serves God or the God serves Satan. In other words people embodying animals, which suffered colossally after World War II in Jewish and Christian slaughter agricultural factory farms-contemporary Christian and Jewish Nazi concentration camps of animals, shall decide in these elections, if they opt for revenge of apparently Nazi Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) and they will want to establish the Nazi slaughter concentration camps of people, especially of Jews again, or contrarily for forgiveness and remedy of the Green Party, if the Austrian Green Party promissed to establish Christian mercy also in relation to animals (in the spirit of Biblical verses: Deuteronomy 32King James Version (KJV): 35 To me belongeth vengeance and recompence; their foot shall slide in due time: for the day of their calamity is at hand, and the things that shall come upon them make haste. 36 For the Lord shall judge his people, and repent himself for his servants, when he seeth that their power is gone, and there is none shut up, or left. See https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?version=KJV&search=Deuteronomy%2032 and  http://www.biblenet.cz/b/Deut/32#v35 ), or of other Biblical verse: Romans 12King James Version (KJV): 19 Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. (see https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?version=KJV&search=Romans%2012 and http://www.biblenet.cz/b/Rom/12#v19 ). I am for many years a member of the Green Party and from my birth I am the baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church and I am also the discoverer of the Philosophy of Balance, of which only one dogma is:  PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE, PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY: „All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." All the rest consists more in views (speculations). At the same time it is a test especially of Christians but also of Jews , that they ultimately declare as the heresy the following part of the teaching of Thomas Aquinas-Sancti Thomae Aquinatis, (1225 - 1274), Catholic philosopher and theologian who is considered as the greatest Christian thinker of all time by the church, SUMMA THEOLOGIAE, Pars Prima, 20. De amore Dei. 2. Utrum Deus amet omnia. I q. 20 a. 2 ad 3: Reply to Objection 3: Friendship cannot exist except towards rational creatures, who are capable of returning love, and communicating one with another in the various works of life, and who may fare well or ill, according to the changes of fortune and happiness; even as to them is benevolence properly speaking exercised. But irrational creatures cannot attain to loving God, nor to any share in the intellectual and beatific life that He lives. Strictly speaking, therefore, God does not love irrational creatures with the love of friendship; but as it were with the love of desire, in so far as He orders them to rational creatures, and even to Himself. Yet this is not because He stands in need of them; but only on account of His goodness, and of the services they render to us. For we can desire a thing for others as well as for ourselves. In Latin: Ad tertium dicendum quod amicitia non potest haberi nisi ad rationales creaturas, in quibus contingit esse redamationem, et communicationem in operibus vitae, et quibus contingit bene evenire vel male, secundum fortunam et felicitatem, sicut et ad eas proprie benevolentia est. Creaturae autem irrationales non possunt pertingere ad amandum Deum, neque ad communicationem intellectualis et beatae vitae, qua Deus vivit. Sic igitur Deus, proprie loquendo, non amat creaturas irrationales amore amicitiae, sed amore quasi concupiscentiae; inquantum ordinat eas ad rationales creaturas, et etiam ad seipsum; non quasi eis indigeat, sed propter suam bonitatem et nostram utilitatem. Concupiscimus enim aliquid et nobis et aliis. (see http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/aquinas/summa/sum023.htm and http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/sth1015.html and  http://www.cormierop.cz/Summa-teologicka-Icast.html ) Result of the above mentioned heresy of Thomas Aquinas is, that most Christian churches, especially the Catholic Church claim on the one side, that only one God is love (i.e. caritas), however on the other side they do not bother about and they do not protest against agricultural slaughter factory farms - today's concentration camps of animals at present time in a large amount killing and torturing livestock. This heresy is apparently in conflict against elementary emotions of living creatures, especially against elementary human emotions, and also against the theory of evolution of exact natural science, according to which also animals and other living creatures can gradually improve their rational mind, i.e. reason, and it seems faster than humans, because they can learn from people, and it is also against at least one Biblical part, for example Old Testament, Genesis 3King James Version (KJV) Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? (see https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?version=KJV&search=Genesis%203 and http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Gen&no=3 ), where the serpent, thus animal spoke and so it had apparently also rational mind, i.e. reason, and it is also against Biblical verses of the New Testament, the Gospel: Luke 10King James Version (KJV) 29 But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour? 30 And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. 31 And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. 32 And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. 33 But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, 34 And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. 35 And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee. 36 Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves? 37 And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise. (see https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?version=KJV&search=Luke%2010 and http://www.biblenet.cz/b/Luke/10#v29 ) It is also the test of the Jews, if then from the above mentioned reasons they abandon their desire to restore a Jewish temple in the original form, which represented the largest and possibly therefore the most cruel slaughterhouse of antiquity, i.e. of ancient times, and if the Jews start to breed animals until their natural death, on principle of their old age and to eat carrions, i.e. in Hebrew language “nevelot” also inspite of the ban of Biblical Old Testament (Bible, Deuteronomy 14King James Version (KJV), 21 Ye shall not eat of anything that dieth of itself: thou shalt give it unto the stranger that is in thy gates, that he may eat it; or thou mayest sell it unto an alien: for thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God. Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk., see https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?version=KJV&search=Deuteronomy%2014 and http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Deut&no=14 ). Otherwise we can expect, that in short time the elections in Austria will be reflected in the elections in Germany, especially in Bavaria, as it was before the World War II, and because Germany is the European leader, so Nazism can subjugate Europe again and apparently it can start also a new world war, especially against the Jews in Israel, if such Nazi Europe provides the Islamic States around the Jewish State of Israel with nuclear weapons.

13) 28/04/2016 Usury, especially in the Czech Republic.

A) My corrected new opinion on some contemporary tendencies in insolvency and executionary law, inter alia on judgments of submitted and proved claims of executor's remunerations in debt forgiveness judicial proceedings by me as the insolvency administrator (see also http://www.novinky.cz/finance/400134-lichvari-dal-nici-lidi-bez-financnich-rezerv.html ), in terms of my Philosophy of Balance (see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz či www.spvzt.sweb.cz ) and contemporary Czech Constitutional law

 

If in the insolvency proceedings the judicial executor submits and proves his or her claim from title of the costs of execution proceedings, in which he enforced nothing, in the opinion of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic (I.e. in the order the second highest Czech court below the Czech Constitutional Court) this judicial executor is not entitled to it at all and it is on the grounds that "the claim (the right to reimbursement of the costs of execution for judicial executor is created) is created in the moment, when he enforced claim or its part within the administration of execution." (cf. judgment of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic file number 29 Cdo 5/2014 from 22 December 2015). If the judicial executor enforced nothing, it is correct to deny authenticity of the executor's claim. (see http://www.ismorava.cz/clanky/305-naklady-soudniho-exekutora-v-insolvencnim-rizeni )

 

The below mentioned implies, that at present time circa 3,000,000/0,7 = 4,300,000 executions are conducted by all the judicial executors, then one execution has circa 350,000,000,000/4,300,000= 81.000 CZK of the average principal amount to be recovered, then it is from 3,000,000 (unenforceable executions)*6,500 CZK (circa minimum remuneration and costs of the judicial executor both without value added tax)/157 (contemporary total number of judicial executors) = 19,500,000,000 CZK/157 = 124,000,000 CZK the average income of one judicial executor from the amounts of minimum remuneration and costs of these unenforceable execution proceedings + from the remaining 30% enforceable execution proceedings in the average principal amount 81.000 CZK (see above but the average principal amount is probably much lower, because in my experience on principle only low claims to a maximum principal amount of about 30.000 CZK are executionary enforceable, the lower is the principal amount, the higher is a probability of success of the given execution), from which at present time is 12,150 CZK (remuneration of judicial executor) + 3,500 (lump-sum of costs on principle required by the judicial executor) = 15,650 CZK (or 7,500 CZK from by me experienced enforceable principal amount of circa 30,000 CZK) the average remuneration of the judicial executor and his or her costs both without value added tax *1,300,000 (enforceable executions, see above)/157 (contemporary total number of judicial executors) =130,000,000 CZK (or 65,000,000 CZK in my experience, see above) the average income of one judicial executor, i.e. the total annual income of the average one judicial executor is about 124,000,000/10 (execution proceedings can theoretically run according to the contemporary legal conditions for the whole life of debtor, which is true especially for the above unenforceable executions, therefore for these executions I count the average time of duration at least 10 years until discontinuance of execution proceedings) =12,400,000 CZK per year at most from unenforceable executions for one judicial executor +130,000,000 (or 65,000,000)/3 (in my experience enforceable execution lasts on average circa 3 years) = 43,000,000 (or 21,500,000) per year from the enforceable executions for one average judicial executor, i.e. the total annual gross income of the average judicial executor from both the enforceable and the unenforceable executions should be circa 55.5 (or 33) million CZK per year, then average one judicial executor has 20 employees (i.e. 3000 employees, i.e. apparently total number of employees of all judicial executors/157 contemporary total number of judicial executors = 20), the employer's costs for one employee from their average gross wages 27,706 CZK per month in the Czech Republic in 2016 are about 37,200 * 12 = 450,000 CZK per year, then it is for average 20 employees of one judicial executor in total sum circa 450,000 * 20 = 9,000,000 CZK, thus the annual average net income of one judicial executor him- or herself after deduction of all overhead costs and all costs for his or her employees before contributions of income tax and health and social insurance by the judicial executor should be circa 55,500,000 (or 33,000,000)-2 * 9,000,000 CZK (if we count the overhead costs of the average judicial executor in the same amount as the costs for all his or her employees, because employees are generally the most expensive in the business)=37.5 million (or 15 million) CZK per year, thus there is theoretically room for a reduction in the total amount of 12.4 million per year from the unenforceable executions for each one average judicial executor (which corresponds in substance with the contemporary case-law of the Supreme and Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic, and it depends on the honesty or dishonesty of each judicial executor, if  he or she respects or does not respect this case-law in his or her decisions, on principle for honest judicial executors who respect this case-law, there is no room for more aggressive reduction in remunerations and costs of executions), and it is not also necessary to establish the territorial jurisdiction of the judicial executors by region, therefore according to the above mentioned for example the smaller executor's company, which has about 5 employees, has annual gross income of judicial executor him- or herself, including overhead costs of his or her executor's office after deduction of wages of his or her employees: circa 55.5( or 33, or after the deduction of the total amount of 12.4 million CZK per year from unenforceable executions for each one average judicial executor, i.e. 43, or 20.5) million CZK (for average 20 employees)/4(for average 20/4 = 5 employees) =13(or 8, or after this deduction of the amount from the unenforceable executions the amount of 11, or 5) million CZK per year -2.3 million CZK for the employee (i.e. for 5 employees = 5 * 450,000 CZK, see above) =circa 10.5 (or 5.5, or after this deduction of the amount from unenforceable executions the amount of 8 , or 3.7) million CZK per year.

 

Literature:

1) Newsletter of Konkursních novin / Bankruptcy papers, number 7 | April 15, 2016 | volume XIX | the national edition | monthly magazine, article: „V případě, že exekutoři budou nuceni svou činnost ukončit, hrozí náhrada škody ve výši 100 miliard. Podstatné snížení exekučního tarifu povede podle exekutorů k rozpadu systému vymáhání práva / "In the case that the executors will be forced to terminate their activities, there is the risk of damages compensation in the amount of 100 billion. Substantial reduction in the executionary tariff will lead to the disintegration of the system of law according to the executors", according to which is conducted circa "three million currently conducted unsuccessful execution proceedings" by all executors at present time, "unenforceable executions (up to 70% of proceedings)", "executors currently enforce the principal amount of 350 billion CZK", the executors have apparently "more than 3000 employees"

2) at present time 157 of executor's offices is taken, see http://www.ekcr.cz/seznam-exekutoru

3) http://www.penize.cz/kalkulacky/vypocet-ciste-mzdy#mzda

4) https://ispis.cz/kalkulacka?module=VD/exekutor.cgi

5) judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic file number: II. ÚS 928/14-1: Recital of law I.: The constitutionally conformal interpretation of § 89 of Act No 120/2001 Coll., on the judicial executors and the executionary activity (Executionary Code), and amending other laws, as in force until 31 December 2007 implies, that obligation to refund the costs of execution should be transferred to an entitled person only in exceptional cases. It is impossible to be identified with the interpretation, according to which reimbursement of the costs of execution proceedings should be always secured for an executor. It is the executor, who has the profit (remuneration) from the successful fulfillment of execution, but at the same time he or she carries the risk consisting in the fact, that the assets of the obligated person would be insufficient to satisfy not only the entitled person, but also not to refund the costs of execution, and taking this risk cannot be groundlessly transferred to the entitled person. II. Only the dictum of decision is capable to induce effects, which the law brings together with its legal force and enforceability. If in the review of the resolution of the judicial executor in its dictum about the costs of execution the court of appeal accepted as binding the conclusion of judicial executor about the reason for discontinuance of execution and the question of the correct determination of this reason pursuant to the provision of § 268, subsection 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure it did not examined longer, it deduced the faulty conclusion about the fact, who is responsible for discontinuance of execution. If the general court qualified erroneously the question of procedural responsibility of entitled person for discontinuance of execution as the condition for the imposition on the entitled person of obligation to reimbursement of costs of execution according to § 89 of the Executionary Code as in force until 31 December 2007, it violated the right of the entitled person to a fair trial under article 36, subsection 1 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms and the right to own property under article 11, subsection 1 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms.

 

Note: your calculation is absolutely wrong, because for example multiple executions do not enter your calculation" (disidentified and shortened opinion of with me cooperating judicial executor). My comment on this opinion is that, if in the case of multiple execution it is unenforceable execution, so honest judicial executor does not charge his or her minimum costs and his or her minimum remuneration of this execution anyway, if however it is enforceable execution, so anyway the judicial executor receives 15% of the principal resulting from the sum of all principal amounts including all execution titles contained in the multiple executions, therefore in both cases the multiple executions does not affect result of the above mentioned calculation. 

 

B) I publish also my earlier completely opposite opinion on usury in the Czech Republic, because in my personal experience I do not believe too much in Movement ANO of Andrej Babiš, who controls a big number of mass media in the Czech Republic, which need not be objective in substantial degree so, and whose Movement ANO controls inter alia the Czech Ministry of Justice, because this Movement ANO is financed by the great suffering of animals in the agricultural slaughter factory farms of animals as today's concentration camps of animals in his agricultural giant Agrofert (see also http://svobodneforum.cz/tajna-analyticka-zprava/ about the possible reliability of this source about Andrej Babiš see https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavel_%C5%A0afr ) and, if it is some higher justice, so humanity must be very punished for this unnecessary colossal death and pain of animals.

 

My earlier opinion in terms of my Philosophy of Balance (see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz or www.spvzt.sweb.cz ) and of contemporary Czech constitutional law on some contemporary tendencies in insolvency and executionary law, inter alia on judgments of submitted and proved claims of executor's remunerations in debt forgiveness judicial proceedings by me as the insolvency administrator

 

If in the insolvency proceedings the judicial executor submits and proves his or her claim from title of the costs of execution proceedings, in which he enforced nothing, in the opinion of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic (I.e. in the order the second highest Czech court below the Czech Constitutional Court) this judicial executor is not entitled to it at all and it is on the grounds that "the claim (the right to reimbursement of the costs of execution for judicial executor is created) is created in the moment, when he enforced claim or its part within the administration of execution." (cf. judgment of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic file number 29 Cdo 5/2014 from 22 December 2015). If the judicial executor enforced nothing, it is correct to deny authenticity of the executor's claim. (see http://www.ismorava.cz/clanky/305-naklady-soudniho-exekutora-v-insolvencnim-rizeni ) This and similar social trend reminds me of pogroms against the Jewish traders with money or debts, sometimes called also as usurers in the Middle Ages, when at first the State canceled the claims of the Jews against their debtors, by which many of them were often completely impoverished, and then the State did not shield them, but the State often incited the crowd in anti-Jewish pogroms, although the Jews, on principle the traders with money or debts were mostly under direct legal protection of the monarch and they secured vital funding of medieval States, on principle kingdoms. In my opinion the contemporary Czech legislation of debt forgiveness judicial proceedings is in accordance with natural law, in my opinion the contemporary Czech Insolvency Act does not require debtors' speaking and writing truth, but mainly their honesty (in the words of the Act "an honest intention of the debtor", which means according to me the obligation of each to cause the least possible death and pain /it means especially of people, but also of other living beings/), thus the least possible death and pain also of debtors and of their creditors and of traders with money or debts, in the Middle Ages on principle of the Jews, today it concerns banks (i.e. nice usurers), hard usurers, executors, insolvency administrators, agencies of debt forgiveness judicial proceedings etc. The contemporary democratic Czech system of trading with debts has these properties, debts should be fulfilled (i.e. old legal principle "pacta sunt servanda"), a debtor – natural person, who fails to fulfill debts, had to make a big mistake in his or her life (according to me he or she or his or her family, especially his or her ancestors or descendants caused a lot of unnecessary death and pain of the people, but also of other living creatures), he or she is not guilty of these errors, because according the contemporary exact science the thinking is apparently only the result of connection of circa 100 billion nerve cells in the brain, however the individual must bear the responsibility for these mistakes, that information of these mistakes was saved into his or her genetic code, virtually thinking, which is in my opinion the basis of lifelong education, virtually learning of all living creatures, and in my opinion also the basis for evolution of nature (in the words of the law in the case of debtors it is objective responsibility for their mistakes without their guilt in case of their bankruptcy, on principle of their over-indebtedness according to my Philosophy of Balance), therefore the punishment against debtors – natural persons for non-fulfillment of their debts should be educational, i.e. not destructive, while this educational punishment in the contemporary democratic legal order against debtors in bankruptcy, on principle in their over-indebtedness the banks (the so-called nice usurers) usually provided them with the first loan at a relatively advantageous interest, if the debtors are unable to repay for their loans to these nice usurers, according to my Philosophy of Balance because of the debtor's breach of the obligation of each to cause the least possible death and pain, so these responsible debtors will get into a precarious existence and only hard usurers will be able to provide them with another loan at a relatively high interest (sanction, i.e. penalty interests, virtually any other sanction increases are limited according to the contemporary case-law of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic to at maximum 0.5% daily of the outstanding amount, i.e.. circa 180% per year, taking into account the required normal interest rate, APR (i.e. Annual percentage rate)  of certain loan, virtually of certain credit, for example if the APR of the loan, virtually of credit is 100% of the outstanding amount per year for highly insolvent debtors, sanction increases cannot achieve together in total above mentioned 0.5% of the outstanding amount daily, but in this case these sanction increases must be much lower), no Bank already lends these debtors money, because they are in the registry of debtors, and these hard usurers carry out socially useful function, because they lend also debtors in extreme existential precarious need with nearly zero ability to repay their loans, whom no one is willing to lend money and so these hard usurers often save these debtors and their families from death from starvation or ending up on the street without shelter, in my experience of the insolvency Administrator it often concerns divorced mothers with young children, however even these hard usurers are entrepreneurs and they should earn living costs, thus the purpose of their business is the profit, for example If throughout all his or her life before his or her retirement the hard usurer lends in total only 10 debtors 1 million CZK without all increases, for example each of these 10 debtors 100,000 CZK, also average hard usurer doing business must earn net income at least circa 1.3 million CZK per a year, that  he or she and his or her family have enough money to live in contemporary Czech Republic, if for example. 7 of these debtors (with nearly zero ability to repay the loan) repay together in total 300,000,- CZK per year throughout all the time of recovery of their loan, then the remaining 3 debtors (also whose lives the hard usurer has often saved by means of the above mentioned loan in extreme existential precarious need with nearly zero ability to repay loans of these debtors as well as lives of the other above mentioned debtors) must repay together to the hard usurer (otherwise the hard usurer will go bankrupt and he or she will become also a debtor in extreme existential precarious need with nearly zero ability to repay his or her loans) in total at least 1 million CZK with usual bank interests throughout all the time of recovery of their loan instead of the above mentioned 7 debtors, who will not often repay also it, what they borrowed, because in the future these in the future solvent 3 debtors will restore to financial health with provided time and at that future time they will already have sufficient financial resources to repay their loans, for example even in the execution and, if the debtors will not succeed in repayment of their loans in execution, so for example even with the aid of debt forgiveness judicial proceedings, during which in 5 years of the duration of these judicial proceedings the debtors can repay on principle at least only 30% of their debts in the amount calculated at the date of commencement of these judicial proceedings, that the debts would be forgiven to these debtors in these judicial proceedings by the insolvency court, but according to my interpretation of the Czech Insolvency Act it can be repaid also less from  the important social reasons, while speaking or writing merciful lie by the debtor in extreme emergency is not excluded from the above mentioned main requirement of “an honest intention of the debtor” according to my interpretation of the Czech Insolvency Act (according to article 6, subsection 1 of the Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms: Everyone has the right to life. And speaking and writing truth are specially protected in no article of this Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms.), it means that at present time every honest debtor can so in fact more probably legally go through debt forgiveness judicial proceedings, although the debtor in extreme need moves on the edge of the law (e.g. contracts of gift in favour of the debtor limited only for the purpose of the debt forgiveness judicial proceedings, which are enforceable very hardly or which are apparently not enforceable at all by someone other than the debtor against donors of the debtor), thus also both the executor and insolvency administrator can play, and they play the positive role in this democratic legal system of trade with the debts, because they help nice usurers (i.e. banks) and also hard usurers with education of debtors to correct their ways, in my opinion with the fact, that in the future debtors will perform in better way a permanent obligation of everyone to cause the least possible death and pain (especially of people but also of other living creatures or beings). Therefore also both executors and insolvency administrators are entitled to their adequate remuneration and the State, which commissioned them on behalf of this State to trade with debts, cannot deny them it on principle (according to the article 11, subsection 1 of the Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms: "Everyone has the right to own property. The right of all owners to posses has the same statutory content and protection." or according to article 28 of the Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms: "Employees have the right to equitable remuneration for the work..." or according to the article 2, subsection 3 of the Constitution of the Czech Republic: "State power serves all citizens ..."), therefore in my opinion also the executors are entitled in the case of their submitting and proving claims of their minimum costs of execution in the debt forgiveness judicial proceedings in the amount of circa 8000.- CZK, from which in the case of majority of the debt forgiveness judicial proceedings of debtors just in the course of the 5 years in my long-time experience of insolvency administrator they will gain anyway only circa 2700,- CZK, i.e. the smallest allowable degree of 30% satisfaction, if they acted in the given executionary matter, and even though they enforced nothing, to the adjudication of these costs by insolvency court and according to me the above decision of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic is in breach of the constitutional order of the Czech Republic and on principle I will adjudicate their claims.

 

14) 30/04/2016 Integrated crop agriculture or ecological organic crop agriculture in the Czech Republic according to the Philosophy of Balance.

Apparently relatively new apparently Czech attitude of integrated crop agriculture perhaps inspired also by my Philosophy of Balance, which seeks to combine the benefits of both "organic" (i.e. of "bio") and "conventional" (i.e. normal, virtually in my Philosophy of Balance under the term "standard") agriculture enacting its rules with regard to local especially climatic conditions of certain State, its rules include the minimization or complete exclusion of fertilizers and pesticides (i.e. an integrated production strives to achieve optimal returns while ensuring higher quality of products in a manner that does not pollute the environment, integrated production favors environmentally friendly farming methods, in particular it minimizes the use of agrochemicals, integrated production seeks to maximize the use of biological and other non-chemical methods of plant protection and the least possible consumption of pesticides, in the framework of integrated production used pesticides must not be dangerous poisons and must be applied selectively, i.e only to the targeted pest, integrated production must be economically efficient, i.e. profitable, gentle, must provide healthy, quality products without substances hazardous to human health, products of integrated production can be identified by the logo that is printed on them - for examples, see pictures and for details see http://vitejtenazemi.cz/cenia/index.php?p=integrovana_zemedelska_produkce&site=puda ), is apparently in many cases more in compliance with by me proposed Symbiotic agriculture than organic agriculture at present time in the Czech Republic, because in my experience the organic crop agriculture products are imported into the Czech Republic on principle mostly from a long distance at least from Spain or Italy, especially due to the warm climate suitable for organic (i.e. bio) agriculture in these distant States, by which these organic crop agriculture products cease to be organic. (See http://www.spvzt.cz/symbiotickezemedelstvi.htm )

Literature: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinohradnictv%C3%AD (I quote: "This ungentle attitude is already replaced by the so-called Integrated Production of Wine that internationally sets clear rules, which include for example minimization or complete exclusion of fertilizers and pesticides in the production of the wine.") http://www.vinotekabudamont.cz/show-free.htm?fid=32 (I quote: “What is sacramental wine, and what is the manufacturing process?” ... Vineyards must be at least integrated production ... "Filtering may only be used for the cleanup of (sacramental) wine. Bentonite can be used to remove proteins (note of author: i.e. no substances of animal origin, such as e.g. gelatine).”) http://www.katyd.cz/clanky/jake-je-tajemstvi-mesniho-vina.html  (I quote: "Rules, which production of sacramental wine must comply, Czech Bishops' conference sets for our territory. It requires above all, that the grapes, from which the wine is produced, came from Bohemia and Moravia. Another condition says then that during the production of sacramental wine any additives such as colorings, flavorings or sugars must not be used.")

 

15) 03/05/2016 My relationship to carnivores and herbivores according to the Philosophy of Balance.

A) PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE, PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY: „All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." All the rest consists more in views (speculations).

 

B) Bible, Genesis 1

29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. 31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day. (see https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?version=KJV&search=Genesis%201 )

 

So even in the Biblical paradise there were apparently also for example lions, i.e. predators and they had a meaning, but their diet apparently just as a diet of herbivores in the Biblical paradise was primarily plant seeds and plant fruits and in the worst case other parts of plants, which is also the goal of my Philosophy of Balance in relation to both predators and herbivores. According to the Jewish Kabbalah those Biblical paradise is not somewhere in the heaven, but it exists on our Earth or in the Universe, only we ourselves deformed it, virtually made horrible beasts from it up to the contemporary form, where living creatures each other hate and fight a life-death survival according to Darwinism.

 

C) Therefore the ideal animal currently eats only plant seeds and plant fruits from all living creatures, which I presume the compliance with the above-mentioned three conditions. That we cause the least pain and fear of eaten plant seeds and plant fruits. At the same time it arises between us, between me-the man and the plant seed or fruit, no hatred, not love, but we tolerate each other, because it has to be (I am helping it to reproduce as I pick the plant fruit with plant seed, I eat it and I spread it on an area and seeds have a greater opportunity to grow than they felt down under any one plant, they would kill each other. At the same time all the seeds cannot grow because there is not sufficient land, which is created by the dead living organisms, when one seed grows into an ear of hundred plant seeds, the passage through the digestive tract in some plant seeds is condition in order to grow), it is the least possible evil in the above cycle of life. In digestion, virtually earlier in the cooking plant fruit and plant seeds it leads to the killing, because the plant fruits and seeds are also formed by the living cells, which appear to feel some kind of pain in their premature death, but because it is evolutionarily the simplest kind of organisms (or the germs of new plants), which can serve man as a natural food, there is the least possible pain caused by man. With decreasing evolutionary maturity of a living organism the perceived pain of injury or of death of the organism decreases. Philosophy of Balance p. 120

D) From the above the assumption follows, that man is as an omnivore  (here also as carnivore) permanently unable to survive on a purely vegetable diet, dairy products with microbial rennets and eggs, I myself was purely on this diet since January 16, 2011 (i.e. three months), when I left out Worcester sauce from my diet. I believe, that from the exact scientific perspectives (I leave aside my Rational Mystique of my Philosophy of Balance) … those religions that dictate and corroborate the possibility of permanent pure vegetarianism as Hinduism, they do not speak the truth and people, who say they are pure vegetarians, so either they unknowingly eat food from dead animals (such as me above mentioned Worcester sauce, which, inter alia, is probably from India, seat of Hinduism or the above case of Dalai Lama) or they do not tell the truth intentionally. As to me it is necessary to eat in case of each human as omnivore in the long term the minimum possible level of dead animals to prevent the serious health problems. Here according to the Philosophy of Balance a person apparently must only eat naturally dead animals (carrions) (as advocated by the ancient Roma). Philosophy of Balance p. 399-400 Eating naturally dead animals, on principle of old age by human is not a new idea, but the idea is thousands of years old and it comes from India. Survived in old Roma (sometimes also Gypsies), who originate and in the middle ages they came to Europe from India. "Under the old Roma are carrions (cadavers) cleaner meat, because the animal didn't die in a violent death", and Roma also invented an ingenious recipe, how to eat the carrions (cadavers), "the carrions are boiled in more waters" (see http://www.mills.cz/assets/Absol_prace/AP2010-SP_denni/Rosecka-SP2010.pdf ), and it was at least thousands of years ago, when they came to Europe, and when no one has ever heard of the sterilization of surgical instruments. BOOKLET OF THE PARTY FOR THE RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING CREATURES p. 35

E) Article I. Eternal duty of all living creatures (1) Fundamental duty of all living creatures is to cause the least possible death and pain. The perfect living creature eats then only plant fruits and plant seeds from all living creatures. (Further also eternal duty of members). (4) Member has right also to eat only gradually in extreme emergency (especially from serious health reasons) eggs, in extreme emergency carrions of living creatures died of natural causes, on principle of old age, or in extreme emergency collected blood of non-slaughtered animals and humans and milk, or in extreme emergency plants, all always the most mercifully as possible bred and killed, and products purely from them. Philosophy of Balance p. 22

F) Conclusions of my experiment: … one is a carnivore and this one cannot live on a vegetarian diet. … this one should get due to humanity superior vegetarian food (also the best are home eggs, where they do not let the roosters to slaughter, and semi-hard or curd cheese from microbial rennet best from the milk from organic farming, where they do not let the males to slaughter) and food from naturally dead, not slaughtered, eventually frozen animals. … this one should receive the least possible amount of food from naturally dead, eventually frozen animals not to harm seriously its health. … Body of naturally dead, eventually frozen animalshould be boiled in several waters, to avoid serious diseases affecting also a human life.this one breeds also other animals such as chickens for home eggs and further those he or she gives to carnivores after their natural death, when he or she has complete confidence, that they are not slaughtered, and after medical autopsy. … Similar rules should be determined experimentally because of humanity (the biblical paradise on Earth) for the other carnivores. Carnivores, such as some snakes that cannot eat carrions, the human before death cannot breed at home, other people can breed them at home apparently, or the God can breed them outside in nature. Philosophy of Balance p. 312

G) In the Roman Catholic Church the most believers including the priest eat, in memory of Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ, the Holy Communion, said body of Christ, i.e. unleavened bread made from grain and water, thus fruitarian (plant seeds and water as in paradise, where they ate also the plant fruits). Thus who eats as in paradise only plant fruits and plant seeds with water (or minerals) he/she reportedly eats the body of Christ Philosophy of Balance p. 349 This bread is also evidently in the form of waffles used in the Roman Catholic Church for the Eucharist as the body of Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ, besides his as blood, i.e. sacramental wine, with plenty of free glucose necessary for carnivores. Philosophy of Balance p. 354 However grape wine and wine grapes can be eg. for dogs deadly.

H) "The Divided Plate Diet" (also sometimes referred to as the Hay Diet) according to Philosophy of Balance... this method is based on the fact that certain foods need for their digestion acidic pH environment, while others need alkaline pH and therefore these foods should not be combined. Typical acidic foods include meat and plant seeds, the typical alkaline-foods include plant fruits. The remaining foods like milk, eggs and vegetables are controversial and classified by species in both groups. SOLVED EXAMPLES AND COMMENTARIES BASED ON PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE p. 117 … the best purely vegetarian organic feed is yarrah for dog or purely vegetarian feed ami cat for cats (in my experience a dog or cat will not survive only on a purely vegetarian feed ami cat or yarrah for dogs, although the manufacturer states that it is a complete feed, during the exclusive long-term use of the purely vegetarian feed ami dog my dog vomited permanently the yellow water), that in my experience animals like to eat and we watch occurrence of the symptoms of allergic reactions of the animals to this feed. Symptoms of an allergic reaction to this feed are vomiting, excessive trembling, diarrhea, or scratching of a dog or a cat, after occurrence of allergic reaction of this dog or cat we feed immediately 200 grams of frozen carrion of an animal Symbiotic agriculture and experiments of natural science proving Philosophy of Balance p. 6-7 AMI CAT is a complete and balanced food for cats, fortified with taurine. Taurine is a protein with a chain of amino acids, which can be produced without killing animals (which is present in muscle tissue). The absence of taurine in cat nutrition is the cause of serious disorders and diseases. The presence of taurine in AMI CAT along with natural and health beneficial ingredients, which are characteristic of AMI products, is ensuring your cat is always in good health and fitness. Philosophy of Balance p. 328 ... 100% BIO ORGANIC YARRAH Adult Dog food, vegan, 100% Certified organic, no added sugar, Composition: wheat, soya beans, corn, sunflower seed husks, semolina, minerals, brewer yeast (see http://www.amipetfood.com/ , http://www.yarrah-bio.cz/content/1-psi )

I) Integrated crop agriculture or ecological organic crop agriculture in the Czech Republic according to the Philosophy of Balance.

Apparently relatively new apparently Czech attitude of integrated crop agriculture perhaps inspired also by my Philosophy of Balance, which seeks to combine the benefits of both "organic" (i.e. of "bio") and "conventional" (i.e. normal, virtually in my Philosophy of Balance under the term "standard") agriculture enacting its rules with regard to local especially climatic conditions of certain State, its rules include the minimization or complete exclusion of fertilizers and pesticides (i.e. an integrated production strives to achieve optimal returns while ensuring higher quality of products in a manner that does not pollute the environment, integrated production favors environmentally friendly farming methods, in particular it minimizes the use of agrochemicals, integrated production seeks to maximize the use of biological and other non-chemical methods of plant protection and the least possible consumption of pesticides, in the framework of integrated production used pesticides must not be dangerous poisons and must be applied selectively, i.e only to the targeted pest, integrated production must be economically efficient, i.e. profitable, gentle, must provide healthy, quality products without substances hazardous to human health, products of integrated production can be identified by the logo that is printed on them - for examples, see pictures and for details see http://vitejtenazemi.cz/cenia/index.php?p=integrovana_zemedelska_produkce&site=puda ), is apparently in many cases more in compliance with by me proposed Symbiotic agriculture than organic agriculture at present time in the Czech Republic, because in my experience the organic crop agriculture products are imported into the Czech Republic on principle mostly from a long distance at least from Spain or Italy, especially due to the warm climate suitable for organic (i.e. bio) agriculture in these distant States, by which these organic crop agriculture products cease to be organic. (See http://www.spvzt.cz/symbiotickezemedelstvi.htm ) Literature: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinohradnictv%C3%AD (I quote: "This ungentle attitude is already replaced by the so-called Integrated Production of Wine that internationally sets clear rules, which include for example minimization or complete exclusion of fertilizers and pesticides in the production of the wine.") http://www.vinotekabudamont.cz/show-free.htm?fid=32 (I quote: “What is sacramental wine, and what is the manufacturing process?” ... Vineyards must be at least integrated production ... "Filtering may only be used for the cleanup of (sacramental) wine. Bentonite can be used to remove proteins (note of author: i.e. no substances of animal origin, such as e.g. gelatine).”) http://www.katyd.cz/clanky/jake-je-tajemstvi-mesniho-vina.html  (I quote: "Rules, which production of sacramental wine must comply, Czech Bishops' conference sets for our territory. It requires above all, that the grapes, from which the wine is produced, came from Bohemia and Moravia. Another condition says then that during the production of sacramental wine any additives such as colorings, flavorings or sugars must not be used.")

J) Dear Hinduist, ... I was doing an experiment … with my longstanding ovo-lacto vegetarian diet (for the uninitiated, I have eaten plant diet, from animal food only milk and eggs), while I was watching the composition of my food, there was no animal ingredient from slaughtered animals, for example food additives, I have not eaten any food supplements or vitamins that could be made from slaughtered animals. The result of this my long-term ovo-lacto vegetarian diet has been the following health problems: abdominal pain, flatulence, diarrhea, vomiting, sores on the mucous membranes, skin peeling, allergic shock (itching and rash throughout the body), sore on joints and articular cartilage, fatigue or tiredness at any greater effort, these problems will disappear whenever I eat the meat of my carrions (cadavers) of animals. Because of your moral resistance to eat carrions (cadavers) I will not die of nutritional inadequacy, for this reason because of my moral scruples I don't have to kill, or I don't have to get killed intentionally any animal for the purpose of my food and I will continue to eat the minimum required amount of carrions (cadavers) of the animals when my above health symptoms occur. BOOKLET OF THE PARTY FOR THE RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING CREATURES p. 34

k) Against snakes (in the Czech Republic, apparently: Vipera berus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vipera_berus , Grass Snake - Natrix Natrix https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grass_snake , smooth snake - Coronella austriaca https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronella_austriaca , dice snake - Natrix tessellata https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dice_snake , Aesculapius snake - Zamenis longissimus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aesculapian_snake in the former Czechoslovak Socialist Republic there were Colubridae protected. Literature: Illustrated Encyclopedic Dictionary, Ill. Part Pro-Ž, prepared by a team of authors of the Encyclopedic Institute of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences under the leadership of the main editors of the Czechoslovak Encyclopedia, Editorial deadline 31/12/1981, published by ACADEMIA, publishing house of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague 1982, first issue, passwords, "zmijovití" (i.e. Viperidae) p. 925, and "užovkovití" (i.e. Colubridae) p. 702) and against mantises ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantis ) it is necessary to apply appropriate countermeasures, which forces them to reprogram their eating (perhaps genetically determined) habits in terms of mercy of their food at least to become scavengers, on principle no snake or no mantis is possible to kill intentionally, all except the cases, that in this way we will cause the least possible death and pain. The above mentioned is necessary to apply within a single dogma of my Philosophy of Balance: PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE, PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY: „All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." All the rest consists more in views (speculations).

16) 05/05/2016 Killing of animals in Hinduism and Buddhism according to verified sources (i.e. novinky.cz , Hare Krishna Movement, vyzivaspol.cz , Alexej Pludek: Advisor of Great Rajas/ Rádce velkých rádžů etc.).

In Nepal Hindus will carry out the world's largest slaughter of animals in the context of the Festival. From Friday Hindu believers in Nepal will begin with the largest two-day slaughter of animals in the world. Despite the strong displeasure and protests they will sacrifice hundreds of thousands of animals within ritual Gadhimai. The Agency AFP informed. During the Gadhimai Festival the Hindus will sacrifice hundreds of thousands of animals. Friday, 28. November 2014, 10:06 a.m. Protectors of animals claim, that the slaughter of animals - from Buffalo to the rats - in the village Bariyarpur is nothing more than the massively perpetrated cruelty against animals. And some local inhabitants are also unhappy, according to whom because of the smell of death even respiration will not be possible in the village. Despite the intervention of the Indian Supreme Court, which ordered the ban on export of buffaloes, large crowds are expected on the two-day Gadhimai Festival held near the Indian border. During the last Gadhimai Festival in 2009 AD in Nepal two hundred thousand animals were slaughtered. Source: Reuters. Hundreds of thousands of people will gather in a local temple every five years and they hope to please the Hindu goddess of power, Gadhimai by sacrificing animals. At the last Festival in 2009 AD there were beheaded or cut throat of estimated 300.000 animals, including chickens, ducks, pigeons and pigs. This Festival was enrolled in the history as the largest animal sacrifice at any place of the world. The traditional Festival. According to legend in Bariyarpur the first animal sacrifice took place several centuries ago, when the Hindu goddess Gadhimai appeared in the dream of the prisoner and she called on him to build a temple in her honor. When he woke up, his handcuffs were open and he could leave prison. He built the temple and as a thank he sacrificed animals in it. The practice of ritual sacrifices has a long tradition in the conservative, predominantly Hindu Nepal. During major holidays the believers sacrifice goats and buffaloes to the gods in the hope that it will ensure them the health and happiness. "Some people tell us that we should not sacrifice animals," 36-year-old Nepali official said, who is prepared to sacrifice a goat. "But we have our faith. During the last Festival I asked Gadhimai, to help to solve the problems of my family regarding the immovable property, and she filled my wish," he added. The local priest Mangal Chaudhary, who is ten generations of the servants of the temple in his family, says, that the number of believers is constantly rising. "We are not forcing anyone to come to sacrifice. People come out of their own will," he said. From local inhabitants criticism comes also. But activists claim, that the main motivation of the organizers is to make money. Therefore, they increase the number of sacrifices, in order to be able to sell the meat then. "There is nothing religious or spiritual. It is all about the money," the representatives of Indian group on the protection of animals said. While some of the local inhabitants feel the Festival as an integral part of their history, for the other inhabitants it represents considerable discomfort. According to Pavan Kumar Biayut, who lives in the neighbouring village, it is "unpleasant experience". "After sacrifices the land is soaked in blood. The air carries the strange smell, which is felt as far as to us. It is hard to respire, "he said. The campaign for the ban of the Festival has gained support of a series of celebrities including English Joanna Lumley, and the French film legend Brigitte Bardot, who have sent a petition to the Nepali President for ending with this "cruel tradition". On the contrary foreign and domestic activists against the Festival are criticized for trying to "violate local traditions". "I'm not a fan of massive cutting throat of animals, but we must be sensitive in relation to historical and cultural aspects of the Festival," said the Chief Editor of newspaper Republica Subhash Ghimire."I did not notice, that there were similar protests because of Thanksgiving Day (Note: in the USA on this day there are killed and eaten millions of turkeys) – why is the reaction so different here?" he added. Novinky, ČTK http://www.novinky.cz/zahranicni/svet/354823-hinduiste-v-nepalu-v-ramci-svatku-rozpoutaji-nejvetsi-jatka-sveta.html

 

Author: Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement. Time: 11/12/2012 ... Again, I ask about the texts or the authority of the idea of eating the carrions (cadavers)? Where or whom is your claim substantiated? Vedic culture functioning under the rule of Kings in the territory of India and in other places thousands years ago very strictly limited eating the meat. In addition, the King took care of it, that this limit was respected. However, if someone could not give up meat eating, they could, under certain restrictive conditions, eat meat of goats, poultry and other lower animals. These population groups, however, have never been mainstream and worked more or less on the sidelines, that they do not disrupt the residents happy with a lacto-vegetarian diet. This information is very detailed in the Puranas and in particular in the Bhágavata Purana, also known as Srimad Bhagavatam, but also in many other places of the Vedic literature such as the Manu’s code-Manu samhita.  ... you will be like the meat eaters banished to the sidelines and at best considered as uncivilized barbarians. ... Signed Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement. http://www.spvzt.cz/SPVZTprirucka.htm#7 , BOOKLET OF THE PARTY FOR THE RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING CREATURES p. 37

 

Kshat means harm and ksatriya is the one who protects from harm (trayate means protect). Kshatriyas learns to kill in the forest. Previously it used to be customary, that the kshatriya went into the forest and fought against the tiger with a sword. If he killed it, royal cremation was expected for the animal. The kshatriya kings in Jaipur still retain this custom. Kshatriyas learns to call to a fighting duel and to kill, because violence motivated by religious principles is sometimes necessary. Therefore sudden adopting sannyas, the status of the renunciation is never recommended to them. Nonviolence can be a diplomatic step in politics, but it is never the principle. In religious codes of law is stated: ... "The king or kshatriya, who fights on the battlefield against another malevolent king, is able to achieve the heavenly planets after the death, as well as Brahmins achieve them through sacrificing animals in the sacrificial fire" The killing on the battlefield, which is motivated by religious principles, and the killing of animals in the sacrificial fire are not certainly considered as violent acts, because their religious nature will bring benefit to all. The sacrificed animal immediately gets the human body, without that it must pass through a gradual evolution from one living form to another, and kshatriyas killed on the battlefield will reach the heavenly planets as well as the Brahmins, who were reaching them through performing sacrifices. (see above chapter.strophe: 2.31, p. 102-103) In the Vedic literature there are described many activities that are the subject of the dispute. For example it is said, that the animal may be killed during sacrifice, but at the same time some thinkers advocates, that killing animals is very bad. Although the Vedic literature during sacrifice the animal killing recommends, it is not considered as killed - the sacrifice shall bring a new life to it. Sometimes the soul of the killed animal during sacrifice gets new animal body, and sometimes it is immediately uplifted to human form. However there are different opinions among the sages. Some claim, that the killing of animals should always be avoided, and others say that killing for the purpose of sacrifice is right. … (above mentioned see chapter.strophe: 11.4, p. 714). Kshatriya, the ruler has a lot of very unpleasant duties – he must use violence to kill enemies, and he sometimes must tell lies for diplomatic reasons. These things go with politics, but this does not mean, that kshatriy should renounce his obligations and try to perform duties of Brahmin. … Even also the Brahmins, who perform different sacrifices, sometimes must kill animals, because it is necessary to sacrifice them in some ceremonies. And, if the kshatriya, doing his duties, kills enemies, he does not act also erroneously or sinfully. (above mentioned see chapter.strophe: 18.47, p. 744) . Literature: Bhagavad-gita-taková jaká je/ Bhagavad-Gītā as It Is, Šri Šrimad A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada  - the founder of the international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement, The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust International, Inc., 1998.

 

Hinduism. Vegetarianism and the ban on the consumption of beef meat are characteristic for diet of the Hindus. However in ancient Hindu texts we can read that consumption of beef meat was usual thing. It is possible that a later ban on the consumption of beef meat (1000 AD) was an effort to distinguish from the Muslims. These diet practices are followed mainly by people of higher castes, the beef meat consumption is tolerated for lower castes, apparently because of the fact, that the beef meat is an important source of proteins for the physically working. The caste system extends to a large extent even to eating practices, it determines, who with whom can eat, who from whom can accept food, etc. Acceptance of food from a lower caste member "pollutes" the spiritual purity of the member of the higher castes. Just some products (derived from cow) are considered as pure and they cannot be polluted by touch. These products include: purified butter (ghee) and milk. Among Hindus vegetarianism is the most common, they do not consume meat, fish, some of them eggs. However there are also exceptions. The caste of fighters, kshatriya consumes fishes, in this case the fishes are an important source of proteins, because their lack might have a negative impact on their fighting capacity. Fasting (i.e. abstinence) the Hindus usually follow from two to three days a week. During these days "clean" food (milk, fruits, nuts or roots that contains starch) is only allowed. The fasting period is influenced by the religious celebrations and by membership in the certain caste. In the Hare Krishna Movement the attitude to food has principal meaning. Here the food is not only to strengthen the body but mainly to strengthen the spirit. The food is accepted in the form of "prasadam" (the food sacrificed to the supreme personality of the deity). Food preparation and its consumption we can compare to the church service. Great emphasis is placed on the selection of the raw materials, the maintenance of cleanness, choice of clothing when cooking, dining culture and especially the constant focus of mind on Krishna. Prohibited foods include: meat, eggs, alcohol, cocoa, onion, garlic, mushrooms, leek, coffee and tea. It is also important, that the human has consumed only what he himself prepared. Because food receives negative materialistic cook's energy. When cooking the food tasting is also prohibited, Krishna must be the first who enjoyed the food. Lips, with which he touches the offered food, enrich the material food by spirituality. This is the essence of "prasadam". Prasadam has allegedly the power to uplift spiritually not only the human devoted to Krishna, but even the secular human. see http://www.vyzivaspol.cz/clanky-casopis/jak-ovlivnuji-jednotliva-nabozenstvi-stravovaci-navyky.html 

 

"Didn't got even to any known men, friends of the King Pauravas, in vain he sent message through the servant, that he does not sleep with a girl, he wandered desperately late into the night in the garden, around the Pauravas' home, he sacrificed young goat for Prajapati and peacock for Indra that he prevents crime through his divine power. It was an unusually big sacrifice, especially in the evening, he had to make fictions, he had to lie, that he does not become noticeable; I would soon be getting married, he said to his father, who caught him during this sacrifice. I wanted that a decision about my wedding was happy, that my marriage was blessed by the will of the gods!" (above mentioned see p. 36) … "White-clothed young men, Brahmacharyas accepted donations from pilgrims who came to express their respect for the new king of Āryāvarta in front of the Royal Palace and to attend the ceremonies that they have earned the grace of the Brahma the Creator or of Vishnu the Maintainer or of Shiva the Life-giver." (note: the equivalent of the Divine Trinity, God the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit or Satan) … "The streets were saturated with smoke of smoking sticks, fragrance of flowers and perfumes, baked cookies and fried strips of meat, of fishes, of peacocks, of lambs and of gazelles." (above mentioned see p. 58) … " Long time there were held Samaj festivals, games, party, pilgrimage, from here King used to go hunting in the forest, which was a continuation of the park and in which is hidden a few modest dwellings of sramans and a small Vihara of Buddhist bhikkhus near shady spring pools.(new paragraph) Radhagupta was deafened by these clamour, singing, exultation, colors, excellence, wealth, fragrances and brilliance; but despite it he could not forget the shock, which in the morning he experienced looking at the rushing streams of blood from the cut necks of three hundred bulls, of five hundred gazelles and of thousand peacocks all pulled to the place of sacrifice on the area between the palace and the Ganga at dawn." … "Why he has allowed, that they have been sacrificed, what he created that they lived? It was guru's words. (new paragraph) In this way Papura condemned before pupils the Vedic ceremonies, so he contested incomprehensible sutras and mantras, in this way he despised humbled relationship to the gods, which was enforced from supplicants by Brahmin masters of ceremonies. (new paragraph) The same feeling even more strongly dominated him in arena, after the arrival of the guard, the palace guard, cavalry, infantry, wagon trains and elephants, after lighting the fires on all four sides of the world, praising the king, the favourite of Indra, Yama, Varuna and Prajapati, the major gods of the Vedic hymns, after the allegorical procession of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva with the wives, the highest gods of the era of Upanishads; the fight of wild elephants was organized in arena, struggle for life and death, of gigantic, excited, savage, trumpeting and heavy breathing, provoked against each other, carefully selected from the recently caught herds in the Royal forests in the North from the Ganga. (new paragraph) Could Prajapati, lord of creatures himself watch this bloodshed of innocent animals? It is more blasphemy than praise, more insult than worship. The slaughtered animal, killed by the long tusks of winner, its heavy breathing, the thundered, absorbed lamentation and blood stream rolling from the mouth, it is not the will of god, nor the celebration of life, not a spectacle worthy of wise people." (above mentioned p. 63-64) Literature: Alexej Pludek, Rádce velkých rádžů/Advisor of Great Rajas, published by Český spisovatel, in Prague in 1975 AD.

 

With the development and expansion of Buddhism over other countries in Asia - China, Tibet, Japan and Korea – vegetarianism has expanded also, which is, as in Hinduism, one of the rules fundamentally affecting eating habits. An essential element of this ancient religion is so called Ahimsa - conception of the first commandment consisting in not killing or not harming living beings (jap. tu - sesšó, sanskrt. ahimsa). In this aspect Buddhism was heavily influenced by Hinduism - Buddha also rejects sacrifices, in which animals are killed. In practice however only monks and Orthodox believers refrain from eating meat altogether. As paradoxical fact it might seem, that the breeding of animals for meat Buddhism does not prohibit even for its most devoted believers. The meat of the animal carrions may be consumed in general, as well as fish, but if not killed (i.e. only fish accidentally beached). It is therefore evident, that the meat may be eaten such, as it has not been obtained for the purpose of food. In contrast to other religions Buddhism does not recognize itself consumption, but above all the very act of killing. The way, how the strongly religious monks gain diet, is also very interesting – through begging. (see http://is.muni.cz/th/101234/lf_b/bakalarska_prace.txt , http://www.petrginz.cz/o-buddhismu.html , http://www.animalrights.webz.cz/chranit_zive.htm )

 

17) 08/05/2016 My solution to the problem of infertility of my contemporary fiancée.

Because my fiancée does not want to have a child with me of our health reasons and these her health problems are caused according to my Philosophy of Balance by her normal eating slaughtered meat and by the revenge of living cells of these slaughtered animals and their relatives living cells on my fiancée (and my fiancée, although she is of Catholic confession, according to which only one God should be love, i.e. caritas, does not want change this her opinion despite my explanation, that such a huge unnecessary, i.e. much more than the least possible death and pain cannot remain unpunished, if there is some higher justice), so for longer time I break up with her at her age of 44.5 years, thus 3.5 years before her nearly sure infertility according to exact scientific medicine, if she does not change this her opinion by this time (because, according to the exact science the living cells change completely except nerve cells in the human body once every 7 years, see http://hejnic.webnode.cz/jara/hlava/uceni/biologie-cloveka/ , http://knihovna.orgfree.com/kafka/5.html , i.e. during 3.5 years roughly half living cells of her body can change, thus hated unmerciful living cells for merciful living cells and at least at this time my fiancée can catch be substantially healed, so that she could have children with me), that I gave her the opportunity to have a child with someone other than me, until she will be nearly surely infertile according to exact scientific medicine at her age of 48 years. After that our breakup for the present I will not start looking for another fiancée, with whom I could have a child under the following condition (see according to the below mentioned rules of the Philosophy of Balance the appropriate counterattack against the above mentioned attack, i.e. against the pressure from society, which does not want me to have my own child): Under the present conditions I would not intentionally sacrifice life of any animal for my possible child, who will have to eat from dead animals only carrions (i.e. animals died of itself) boiled in several waters according to the brilliant at least thousand years old Romany recipe and after the veterinary autopsy regarding its health harmlessness otherwise I will be childless until my death (I.e. according to the below mentioned rules of the Philosophy of Balance in the contemporary situation any my intentional death of animal, virtually animals for my possible child could not prevent equally great death and pain, thus save equally valuable life of some living creature with the probability of at least 95-100 %, because at present time due to the overpopulation of mankind on the globe the mankind is not threatened with extinction anyway with the exception of nuclear war or Cosmic disaster. It is also possible to ask a question, if I am perhaps better than Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ, who also apparently does not have, did not have and will not have his own child, neither he is striving for him or her, unlike God the father, who should have according to Christianity own only one Son, and he was Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ, see the  below mentioned Roman Catholic creed). In spite of it I am not too sure, that my solution to the problem of infertility of my fiancée is in fact better than the below mentioned Abraham's solution.

Note:

 

PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE

PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:

„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." All the rest consists more in views (speculations).

 

The obligation not to kill anything alive unless it is absolutely necessary:

1) A human must never kill any living creature, especially human (or him- or herself). (i.e. according to me for the probability of 0-5 percents, that a human kills the human, the first human must begin to save this second human, i.e. at worst case only to recede)

2) A human has a duty to kill as few of living creatures as possible (i.e. for the protection of life) and if so then those naturally feeling the least pain. (i.e. according to me a human can kill any living creature only if the probability of at least 95-100 %, that he or she saves in this way the life of other living creature, so that in this way he or she caused the least possible death and pain). 

3) Regarding for me as a person it  is healthy (i.e. if I am not vomiting and underweight or in allergic shock) to eat from all living creatures only non-sprouting plant seeds (hereafter referred to only as plant seeds, sprouting plant seeds are already young plants) and plant fruits with seeds, of which separation from the plant cannot kill it, while the reproduction of these plants with the maximum health not damaging amount of salt or appropriate quantity of other minerals and water (e.g. for adults and children aged over 11 years the maximum daily dose of six grams of salt, for smaller children five grams, for suckers one gram of salt.) It would probably be concerned seeds of plants (soya beans, peas, beans, corn, etc.) and fruits of plants with seeds, especially trees (such as apples, pears, dates). Philosophy of Balance p. 23

 

Applying for an explanation of the above-mentioned general physical and mathematical definitions the general English language, we can say the following:

 

ad 1)

 

1.1 In the case of an attack against a particular individual from the society of living creatures makes this attack from the living creatures retreat this particular individual from the society of living creatures.

1.2 In the case of retreat of living creatures makes this retreat from the living creatures the individual to the attack against these living creatures.

 

ad 2) Reasonable behavior:

 

2.1 In the case of an attack by the living creatures against a certain individual it is reasonable, so that this individual responded in contrast to paragraph ad 1.1 not by a retreat but by appropriate attack against the society of living creatures (Eg. the seduction of a person of the same sex can be responded by own idea of his or her genital organs).

2.2 In the case of retreat of society of living creatures from a particular individual it is reasonable, that this individual responded in contrast to paragraph ad 1.2 not by an attack but by an adequate retreat from the society of living creatures.

 

Ad 3)

 

3.1 Reasonable attack of certain individuals as a response to the attack of the living creatures against the particular individual neutralizes (or zero) both attacks, sooner or later (i.e. educational, not destructively).

3.2 Reasonable retreat of some individuals in response to the retreat of living creatures from the particular individual neutralizes (or zero) both retreats sooner or later.

 

The result of this procedure is sooner or later, stable development of all living creatures. Philosophy of Balance p. 48

 

In the attack as an appropriate response to attack by society of living organisms it should always be considered if:

 

1) We are able to stop the attack from the side of the living world, sooner or later, without us getting seriously hurt by the attacker and we cause the least possible death and pain of living creatures (see variable momentum vector p1 above in my diagram), or

2) We are able the attack from the society of living organisms only to hamper (see variable momentum vector p2 in my above mentioned diagram), without us getting seriously hurt by the attacker and we cause the least possible death and pain of living creatures, cessation of attacks by living organisms in this case, then we leave it to another living organism (see variable momentum vector p1 above, that in my diagram). Philosophy of Balance p. 48

 

The Nicene Creed

We believe in one God, the Father, the Almighty, maker of heaven and earth, and of all that is, seen and unseen. We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, one in Being with the Father. Through him all things were made.

(see http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/credo.htm )

 

Bible, Genesis 15 2 And Abram said, Lord God, what wilt thou give me, seeing I go childless, and the steward of my house is this Eliezer of Damascus?  3 And Abram said, Behold, to me thou hast given no seed: and, lo, one born in my house is mine heir. 4 And, behold, the word of the Lord came unto him, saying, This shall not be thine heir; but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels shall be thine heir. 5 And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be. 6 And he believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness.Genesis 16 1 Now Sarai Abram's wife bare him no children: and she had an handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar. 2 And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the Lord hath restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai. 15 And Hagar bare Abram a son: and Abram called his son's name, which Hagar bare, Ishmael. Genesis 17 17 Then Abraham fell upon his face, and laughed, and said in his heart, Shall a child be born unto him that is an hundred years old? and shall Sarah, that is ninety years old, bear? 18 And Abraham said unto God, O that Ishmael might live before thee! 19 And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him. 20 And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation. 21 But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year. 22 And he left off talking with him, and God went up from Abraham. Genesis 21 1 And the Lord visited Sarah as he had said, and the Lord did unto Sarah as he had spoken. 2 For Sarah conceived, and bare Abraham a son in his old age, at the set time of which God had spoken to him. 3 And Abraham called the name of his son that was born unto him, whom Sarah bare to him, Isaac. 5 And Abraham was an hundred years old, when his son Isaac was born unto him. 9 And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, which she had born unto Abraham, mocking. 10 Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac. 11 And the thing was very grievous in Abraham's sight because of his son. 12 And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called. 13 And also of the son of the bondwoman will I make a nation, because he is thy seed. 14 And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread, and a bottle of water, and gave it unto Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child, and sent her away: and she departed, and wandered in the wilderness of Beersheba. 15 And the water was spent in the bottle, and she cast the child under one of the shrubs. 16 And she went, and sat her down over against him a good way off, as it were a bow shot: for she said, Let me not see the death of the child. And she sat over against him, and lift up her voice, and wept. 17 And God heard the voice of the lad; and the angel of God called to Hagar out of heaven, and said unto her, What aileth thee, Hagar? fear not; for God hath heard the voice of the lad where he is. 18 Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him in thine hand; for I will make him a great nation. 19 And God opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water; and she went, and filled the bottle with water, and gave the lad drink. 20 And God was with the lad; and he grew, and dwelt in the wilderness, and became an archer. 21 And he dwelt in the wilderness of Paran: and his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt. (see http://www.biblegateway.com/ )

 

(Isaac is according to the Bible the forefather of the Israelites, virtually Jews with their biggest slaughter house of ancient times in the Jewish temple, and Ishmael is according to the Quran the forefather of the Arabs fighting at present time against the Jews for life and death with their contemporary most torturing kosher and halal slaughters of animals)

 

Solution to the problem of infertility of his wife by my grandfather Joseph Roček was following: He and his wife lived childless until his age of 59 years, i.e. until her apparent infertility according to exact scientific medicine, then my grandfather Joseph Roček found a young lover, i.e. my grandmother, with whom he had his single child, i.e. his daughter, i.e. my mother, shortly after the birth of this his daughter my grandfather died of cancer, but before it he bequeathed all his property to my grandmother, i.e. to his above mentioned young lover, shortly after the birth of this my mother this all assets bequeathed  to this my grandmother by my grandfather were nationalized by Communists after the communist revolution in Czech Republic and both my grandmother and this her single daughter, i.e. my mother lived their life in poverty until adulthood of my mother, then my mother at her age of 38 years died of cancer and shortly after her death my grandmother died also, my father and my brother born from both the same mother and the same father still live.

 

18) 08/05/2016 About historicity of Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ and about lifelong virginity of his mother Mary, possibly about lifelong virginity of his father Joseph.

From by me watched content of the film (see Literature below) I mention: The name Jesus in Hebrew יְהוֹשֻׁעַ‎‎ (Yehoshua – i.e. God saves), see https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Je%C5%BE%C3%AD%C5%A1 . Jesus as God should voluntarily deliver himself to death. Jesus had no brothers, because he gave on the Cross his mother Mary to the care of the Apostle John, not to the care of some his brother. In Israel in the Bible the brother (However in Matthew's Gospel there are specifically mentioned Jesus' brothers James, Joseph, Judas and Simon, and unnamed sisters, Bible, Matthew 13, 55 and 56, Christians believe that Mary conceived Jesus as a virgin, some churches eg. Roman Catholic and Orthodox declare, that Mary remained the Virgin throughout all her life, it declared the Lateran synod of 649 AD, but because it was not a general council, this dogma is not of the type that was solemnly proclaimed. However virginity of Mary has not liturgically its own feast. see https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_(matka_Je%C5%BE%C3%AD%C5%A1ova)#Mariino_panenstv.C3.AD ) had a broader meaning also of other wider family members. Why Hosanna, son of David changed for: Crucify in the majority of Jews at that time, because Jesus irritated the Pharisees leaders by his statement, that he is son of only one God, they saw in him a power rival, and because with the fact that they delivered him to the Roman occupiers for the crucifixion, they wanted him to manifest as the messiah with the fact that he would start the war against the Roman occupiers of Israel and Palestine while with it with the fact of the first killing an enemy he would be completely discredited as God. Why mentions of Jesus by Jewish historians did not exist at that time, either, because Jesus and his trial were from their point of view insignificant matters, or because these Jewish historians intentionally suppressed mentions of him. The first mention of Jesus by the Jewish historian is found in Josephus Flavius (he lived 37 anno Domini - 100 anno Domini), with Jewish name Joseph ben Mattityahu (in Hebrew יוסף בן מתתיהו, apparently from the Hebrew “מֵת, met”, in English “dead”), (i.e. the Jew who fought in the revolution against the Romans in the group of Zealots, during hopeless blockade in Jewish fortress by the Romans these Zealots killed each other according to the mathematical formula, Flavius ​​Josephus remained as one of the last two survivors, who should commit suicide according to the mutual agreement or oaths, but Flavius ​​Josephus joined himself with the Romans, he was admitted to the supreme Roman commander Flavius ​​Vespasian in Palestine and Israel, he predicted him that he becomes Roman emperor, after which Flavius ​​Vespasian had become Roman emperor, Flavius ​​Josephus lived as a free man at the imperial court in Rome and he obtained life pension from the Flavian emperors, see https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flavius_Iosephus and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus ), it is so called Testimonium Flavianum in his book “Antiquities of the Jews”: „About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of such people as accept the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Christ. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate had condemned him to a cross, those who had first come to love him did not cease. He appeared to them spending a third day restored to life, for the prophets of God had foretold these things and a thousand other marvels about him. And the tribe of the Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.(Flavius Josephus: Antiquities of the Jews, Book 18, Chapter 3, 3.) This passage should be greatly falsified in later transcripts apparently by unknown Christian copyist, its existence should apparently testify also apparently fairly early translations into Arabic. The Arabic translation of this Flavius book from the 10th century: „ At this time there lived a wise man of name Jesus. His way of life was good and he was known as honest. And many people from Jews and from other nations became his disciples. “Pilate condemned him to be crucified" and to death. They said, that he appeared to them the third day after crucifixion and he was alive; according to it “he was believed to be Christ”, about whom the prophets predicted miracles.“ (see https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testimonium_flavianum and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus_on_Jesus )

Literature: film: My God and Walter/ Můj Bůh a Walter, Christ/ Kristus, Religion course for youth according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. In the eleventh part we will look for answers to many questions stemming from Creed, TV Noe (i.e. Noah) television program on Sunday, May 8, 2016, broadcasted at 17:35 p.m., see www.tvnoe.cz/porad/muj-buh-walter-kristus

19) 10/05/2016 Merciful multiplication of meat, namely of dead fishes for feeding hosts by Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ according to modern exact science.

Luke 9King James Version (KJV), 12 And when the day began to wear away, then came the twelve, and said unto him, Send the multitude away, that they may go into the towns and country round about, and lodge, and get victuals: for we are here in a desert place. 13 But he said unto them, Give ye them to eat. And they said, We have no more but five loaves and two fishes; except we should go and buy meat for all this people. 14 For they were about five thousand men. And he said to his disciples, Make them sit down by fifties in a company. 15 And they did so, and made them all sit down. 16 Then he took the five loaves and the two fishes, and looking up to heaven, he blessed them, and brake, and gave to the disciples to set before the multitude. 17 And they did eat, and were all filled: and there was taken up of fragments that remained to them twelve baskets.

Vegetarian.cz: Why did you modify the name (i.e. my previous change of name from meat tax to the slaughter tax) and what are your reasons for doing so? JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: Here are three reasons. The first one - it is probably not possible to pay the slaughter (meat) tax for each sale of meat from the slaughterhouse, wholesaler, retailer to the final customer as in the case of VAT, but one must use the concept of consumer tax. The obligation to pay the tax will exist only if the first sale after the slaughter of the animal, so slaughter tax. Second, the subject of the slaughter (meat) tax will not be only meat but all the goods from the killed animals, with the exception of registered medicines for sale in pharmacies, so the slaughter tax. I also responded to the possible evolution of current scientific knowledge, which may be able to grow any artificial meat without the slaughter and suffering of animals, the subject of the slaughter tax will be only meat and other goods from slaughtered animals, not such artificial flesh (currently so-called fetal calf serum is most often used for the production of synthetic meat, for whose production it is necessary to kill a cow, there are non-animal feed of tissue cultures, which is very expensive, see http://3pol.cz/1101/print ). Philosophy of Balance p. 299

An even better solution is probably non-animal serum, because according to the notice of DVM. Jan Dolezal jan.dolezal@merck.com from Intervet s.r.o. a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA as "maintenance medium" in the production of Nobivac Rabies vaccine , which is one of the most effective on the market - revaccination every three years, anything of animal origin is not used, because according to the notice of technical manager of the parent company from USA: The previous medium we used for producing the rabies antigen contained various substances of animal origin; tryptose and lactalbumin hydrolysate (both contain milk derivatives) and bovine serum albumin.  The veggie medium we now use contains none of these animal-derived components. We cannot of course supply specific formulation details of the veggie medium as this is commercially confidential information. Certain doubts may occur only that, according to perhaps outdated technical information (see Literature listed below), on the other hand, most tissue cultures grow in serum-free media worse than in the media with serum. Often it is also necessary to "accustom" to grow cell culture in serum-free medium" - the cells are first cultured in a conventional media with serum and then the medium is gradually replaced by the media with low serum and serum-free medium. Among other the company Merck & Co. produces also vaccines against viruses in human medicine. Vaccination of dog at a vet in the Czech Republic against rabies is about 200, - CZK, 1 dose of vaccine Nobivac Rabies about 35, - CZK, 1 dose of other merciful vaccine CANVAC R-annual revaccination from DYNTEC s.r.o., apparently not produced from bovine fetal serum but from bovine (blood) serum, is about 9, - CZK. BOOKLET OF THE PARTY FOR THE RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING CREATURES p. 50-51

20) 12/05/2016 Muslims as a scourge of God according to Abu Bakr (about 573 Mecca – 23rd August, 634 anno Domini Medina) the first caliph after Muhammad, according to the Philosophy of Balance punishing Christians and Jews especially for contemporary Christian and Jewish slaughter agricultural factory farms - contemporary concentration camps of here tortured animals.

 

What is the substance of below described cruel rules of Islam, it was expressed in a single biography from that time  in Czech language “MUHAMMAD ŽIVOT ALLÁHOVA PROROKA“/ in Arabic language “Sírat rasúl Alláh“/ in English „The Life Of Muhammad, Apostle Of Allah“ (see Literature below, chapter Last illness, p. 222)  honoured by all Muslims by the first successor after Muhammad emir Abu Bakr (about 573 Mecca – 23rd August, 634 AD Medina) in words: 'I am appointed to govern you, although I am not the best of you. If I act well you must aid me, and if I act unjustly you must correct me. Truth is faithfulness and falsehood is treachery! No nation has failed to fight for Allah but Allah has punished it with abasement; nor has wickedness become widespread without Allah sending calamity. Obey me as long as I obey Allah and His prophet! But should I rebel against Allah and His prophet you will owe me no obedience! Rise to your prayers and may Allah have mercy on you' This implies, that Muslims can be understood equally as such Vandals, Huns and Mongols, virtually Tatars and Turks (Muslims were related with both religion and blood to the Mongols, virtually Tatars and Turks) in the past as a kind of scourge of God punishing Christians, virtually also Jews for their big mistakes. According to my Philosophy of Balance this big mistake of both Christians and Jews at present time apparently highly insulting omnipresent only one God, i.e. charity are especially contemporary Christian and Jewish slaughter agricultural factory farms - contemporary concentration camps of here tortured animals, if only one God is omnipresent, so He is also present within these animals and, if there is some higher justice, so deserved punishment waits for the perpetrators of this colossal mercilessness causing colossal hatred, if they do not correct their ways. Therefore nuclear war by Muslims as a kind of scourge of God can be expected.

 

Literature:

 

1) MUHAMMAD ŽIVOT ALLÁHOVA PROROKA, IBN ISHÁK, original in Arabic language: Sírat rasúl Alláh, from the English edition by Michael Edwardes, Ibn Ishaq, The Life Of Muhammad, Apostle Of Allah, published by Royal Asiatic Society of London in 1898, translated by Viktor Svoboda, in 2009 published by publishing house LEDA spol. s r.o. and by publishing house Rozmluvy, first edition. See https://archive.org/stream/Sirat-lifeOfMuhammadBy-ibnIshaq/SiratIbnIahaqInEnglish_djvu.txt  

 

2) According to radical Islamists, it is allowed to use violence to spread Islam. Islam divides the world into two parts. Darul Harb (land of war) and Darul Islam (land of Islam). Darul Harb is the land of the infidels, Muslims are asked by radicals to get through to those countries, turning them over to their faith and multiply themselves until their numbers increase, and then to begin the war and to fight and to kill people, until they make Islam the religion and they join this country to Darul Islam. In this sense, the peaceful Suras of Mecca period the radicals interpreted as Suras valid during the period, when Islam is weak, and above violent Suras of Meddina period to be applied by radicals at a time, when Muslims are strong and they can war against unbelievers. According to the radicals it is also possible to cancel any contract with unbelievers, honoring them with the word (Exemption from God and His messenger for those polytheists with whom you have a convention., Sura 9, 1).

 

The dual face of the Koran: Islamic scientists distinguish Suras that comes from the time of residence of Muhammad in Mecca (called Mecca period) and Suras from the period of his stay in Medina (the Medina period).  Suras from the Mecca period are considered conciliatory and peaceful. Suras from the Medina period when Muhammad reached the political power are marked by jihad by sword, but even these Suras do not imply approval of war of aggression against unbelieversa according peaceful Muslims. 1st Killings, corporal punishments, wars: Sura 5, 38: Thieves cut off their hands ... Sura 24, 2: Whip adulterer and the adulteress, each of them one hundred blows! Sura 24, 4: Those who cast suspicion on an honest woman, and then do not bring four witnesses, whip eighty blows ... Sura 2, 178: you who believe, is the prescribed law of blood revenge for the killing: a free man for free man, slave for slave, woman for woman. , Sura 2, 216: And you are prescribed a fight, even when you're uncomfortable, Sura 2, 244: Fight in the path of God (for Allah)., Sura 4, 74: And to those who fought in the path of God and be killed or victorious, those we pay enormous. , Sura 4, 104: Do not finish pursuit of these people in the fight!, Sura 5, 35: O you who believe! Fear God, and look hard on his way ... Sura 8, 39 [text matches the content of Sura 2, 193] Fight then against them, so there was no temptation to apostasy, and that all religion was only God (Allah)., Sura 9, 36 ... but the fight against the infidels as one man, as they fight against you as a man ... Sura 9, 111: And they fight in the way of God - kill and are killed., Sura 47,  35: Do not finish and do not suggest to peace, if you prevail ... Sura 61: God hates the most, that you say something and do not do it, but surely God loves those who fight in His way tight phalanx as if they were lead-related construction. , 2nd Tackling some other religions: Sura 8, 55: The worst creatures of God are those who are repentantly unbelieving and still do not believe ..., Sura 2, 193: And fight them until the end of seduction from the faith until all religions belong to God (Allah)., Sura 2, 191 : Kill them everywhere (i.e. infidel enemies), where overtake, and driving them out of the places from, where they drove you ... Sura 8, 12: I throw myself into the hearts of those who disbelieve, fear, and you beat them and beat the backs, after all fingers! "Sura 4, 76: Those who believe fight in the path of God, and those who disbelieve, fight in the path of idolatry. Fight against the friends of Satan., Sura 9, 5: And when the sacred months elapse, kill the polytheists, wherever you find them, capture them lay siege to them and give against all kinds of pitfalls!, Sura 9, 123: O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near the! Let them find hardness in you and know, that God is at hand, God-fearing!, 3rd Corporal punishments: Sura 5, 38: Thieves cut off their hands in retaliation for what he done ... Sura 24, 2: whip adulterer and the adulteress, each one hundred blows!, Sura 24, 4: Those who cast suspicion on the virtuous woman and then do not bring four witnesses whip eighty blows ... Sura 4, 34: Men occupy the position over women ... And those whose disobedience you fear, and warn they should recognize a place to sleep and beat them, 4th Violation of the principles of equality: Sura 2, 228 ... but men are a step above the women ... Sura 4, 34: Men occupy the position over women ... And those whose disobedience you fear, and warn they should recognize a place to sleep and beat them, Sura 4, 11: And God will provide for your children this: his son for a share of the share of two daughters, Sura 9, 29: Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and do not prohibit what God has forbidden and His messenger, and who not worship a religion of truth, of those who received the scripture - until they charge directly to their own hands, being humiliated., 5th Violations of universal human rights: Sura 2, 223: your wives are your field, Enter ye therefore your land, where you want to ... Sura 4, 15: Against those of your women who commit folly, as witnesses to take the four of you. And if they testify to, hold women in houses until death or it will not be deprived by God (Allah) them of a way out. 6th Violation of general personal rights: Sura 33, 36 And neither believer or the believer is not given the choice in matters of when God and His Messenger decide one thing ... Sura 33.50: Prophet! They let you have your wife, whom you have given dowry, and those whom thy right hand seized from those God has given you as booty, and your cousin's paternal cousin and your mother's side who emigrated with you - and each wife, if she gave the Prophet wishes to marry the prophet dream - and it is exclusively for you, not for other believers., Sura 60, 10: ... and if you find, that they are believers (they) do not send them back to the unbelievers, since they are not allowed, nor they are allowed to them  ... 7th Rejection of religious freedom: Sura 2, 191 ... misleading their faith is worse than killing., Sura 2, 217 ... to blame the faith is worse than killing., Sura 47, 8: those however who do not believe, let fall accidents and let God err their works!, 8th Various Suras: Sura 47, 4-5: And when faced with the unbelievers, strike them in the neck, and when you cause them a complete defeat, firmly confine them, Sura 48, 28: And he is the one who sent a messenger to their right guidance and with true religion to give him victory over every other religion. And God is sufficient witness (see also 5, 34), Sura 66, 9: Prophet, fight hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be strict to them! Their refuge is Hell - how disgusting is that the final goal! , Sura 9, 123: O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near the! Let them find hardness in you and know, that God is at hand, God-fearing! , Sura 8, 39: Fight therefore against them, so there was no temptation to apostasy, and that all religion was only God. , Sura 98, 6: And surely those who are unbelievers owners of Scripture (i.e. Jews and Christians) .... and are the worst of all creatures!, Sura 4, 89: and they would like to become non-believers, as they are, and you were the same. Do not take among them friends until they go the path of God! And if they turn back, then seize and kill, you will find them anywhere! And do not take any friends or helpers ... Sura 2, 216: And you are prescribed a fight, even when you're uncomfortable. However, it is possible that something unpleasant to you, what is good for you, and it is possible to love something that is bad for you, only God knows while you do not know. (Here, here is the combat with arms), Sura 4, 74: Let battle on the path of God those who are buying for a life on Earth a future life! And to those who fought in the path of God and be killed or victorious, we reward those immense., Sura 9, 5: And when the sacred months elapse, kill the polytheists, wherever you find them, capture them lay siege to them and give against all kinds of dangers ! If, however, turns contrite, will observe prayer and give alms, let them go their way, for God he is surely Forgiving, Merciful., Sura 9, 52: What can you expect for us other than one of two beautiful rewards (victory or martyrdom while we expect only to you that God will intervene punishment from Him that will affect our very hands? Just wait, we with you will also be expected. "Sura 2, 193: And fight them until the end of seduction from the faith until all religions belong to God., Sura 9, 111: And God surely bought from the believers their persons and their possessions, that they have been given the garden. And they are fighting on the path of God - kill and are killed. ... So rejoice in Him with his business closed - and that success is enormous., Sura 4, 76: Those who believe fight in the path of God, and those who disbelieve, fight in the path Tághůta. Fight against the friends of Satan, they are weak plots of Satan against you!, Sura 4, 84: Fight in the path of God, you will not bear burden other than your own... Encourage the faithful…, Sura 5, 17: Surely they are unbelievers who say: "Surely God is the Messiah, son of Mary!" Sura 5, 52: O you who believe! Do not take Jews and Christians as friends ... Sura 3, 118: O you who believe! Do not like anyone but the trustees of your people!, Sura 9, 41: Go into a fight lighter or harder and fight your assets and people to the way of God., Sura 4, 104: Do not finish pursuit of these people! And if you suffer, they suffer ", Sura 47, 35: a waning do not suggest to peace, if you prevail ... Sura 5, 38 (42): Thieves cut off   their hands in retaliation for what they had done as a cautionary example of God! And God is Mighty, wise., Sura 4, 89: ... and if they turn back, then seize and kill, you will find them anywhere! Philosophy of Balance p. 140-142

 

21) 13/05/2016 Probabilities of end or salvation of Western rational civilization and of victory or contrarily of the rationalization of primitive instincts on Earth.

 

According to my Philosophy of Balance, if in long term in the world there is law of love, i.e. of caritas (defined in an obvious way in my Philosophy of Balance, that "All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain. All the rest consists more in views (speculations).) the most powerful and if great progress in removing colossal unnecessary death and pain, especially of animals on Earth is not achieved, then it should be the probability 95-100% of the end of Western rational civilization and the re victory of primitive instincts on Earth, it should be in a short time due to the efficiency of existing mass-destructive nuclear weapons. However, it is not possible to determine unambiguously, if it is through rise of Nazism again or through the war with Muslims or otherwise.

If however in long term in the world there is law of love, i.e. of caritas the most powerful (which corresponds to my Christian faith, see Bible King James Version (KJV), Genesis 8, 20 And Noah builded an altar unto the Lord; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar. 21 And the Lord smelled a sweet savour; and the Lord said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done. 22 While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.), so with the probability of at least 51% people will correct their ways and great progress in removing colossal unnecessary death and pain, especially of animals on Earth will be achieved in a short time, and there will not be the end of Western rational civilization and the re victory of primitive instincts on Earth.

22) 21/05/2016 The Prophet Muhammad, i.e. alive against the Christian Mahomet or Mohamed, i.e. dead

 

Content:

Introduction: Semitic philology of important Arabic words in Islam

A/ Loyalty of orthodox Muslims to the Prophet through bloodshed

B/ Persecution of Muslims and attempt to kill the Prophet from inhabitants of Mecca disbelieving in Islam

C/ Effort of the Prophet of peaceful obtaining Jews to Islam

D/ Why did Muslims reject Judaism and Christianity according to Islam

E/ Killing of in Islam disbelieving Arabs and Jews in Islam by Muslims at Prophet's time

F/ Prophet's poisoning by captured apparently Jewish woman

G/ Declaration of partial release from performing any contracts with idolaters, Islam as a religion of Abraham and other most important rules of Islamic law

H/ Sacrificing animals in Islam and during the Prophet's last pilgrimage both Prophet's possible ban on the Islamic pilgrimage and apparent killing sacrificial animals by the Prophet himself

I/ Uncertain next meeting of Muslims with the Prophet, other most important rules of Islamic law about usury, about women, about the brotherhood of all men in Islam and the Prophet's last pilgrimage

J/ Prophet's companions should not resist the Prophet as his disciples resisted Jesus

K/ Prophet's death, its causes, his treatment refusal, his possible fictitious death or his resurrection, Muslims as a scourge of God and the Prophet's wives

 

Introduction: Semitic philology of important Arabic words in Islam

 

1) MUHAMMAD ŽIVOT ALLÁHOVA PROROKA, IBN ISHÁK, original in Arabic language: Sírat rasúl Alláh, from the English edition by Michael Edwardes, Ibn Ishaq, The Life Of Muhammad, Apostle Of Allah, published by Royal Asiatic Society of London in 1898, translated by Viktor Svoboda, in 2009 published by publishing house LEDA spol. s r.o. and by publishing house Rozmluvy, first edition. See https://archive.org/stream/Sirat-lifeOfMuhammadBy-ibnIshaq/SiratIbnIahaqInEnglish_djvu.txt .

 

St. John Damascene, a Syrian Christian and theologian (675-749) considered Muhammad as a false prophet ... In the Christian West the prophet of Islam is called Mahomet, Mohamed ... (above mentioned see Afterword p. 225-226 of the Literature in Czech language). I let it to readers of my extract of regarding my Philosophy of Balance important parts of the text from single by all Muslims honoured biography “MUHAMMAD ŽIVOT ALLÁHOVA PROROKA/ in English „The Life Of Muhammad, Apostle Of Allah“, author Ibn Ishaq, if his name should sound Muhammad (apparently in Hebrew language "amad" - stood or alive) or Mahomet, Mohamed (apparently in Hebrew language "met" - dead).

 

Wocabulary: Banu Qurayza (in Hebrew language „ben“ - son), Aisha (in Hebrew language „isha“ – women), Arab (in Hebrew language „rabim/rav“ – plural number/many, rabbins/ rabbin  – Jewish spiritual), Islam and Muslim (in Hebrew language „shalom“ – peace), Ansar (in Hebrew language „nasir“ - prince)

 

(A/ Loyalty of orthodox Muslims to the Prophet through bloodshed)

 

5- Night Journey

Al-Abbas spoke first, saying, "You know that Muhammad is our kinsman! We have protected him against those of our own people who oppose him. He enjoys dignity among his people, and protection in his country; nevertheless, he shuns them and wishes to ally himself with you. If, therefore you think you can keep your promise and protect him against his enemies, you may assume the burden you have undertaken; but if there is any likelihood of your surrendering and abandoning him after he has gone over to you, then leave him be for he is safer among his own people."

Then we asked the apostle for his opinion and he said, "I call on you to protect me as you would protect your own women and children!"

            A man called al-Bara then took hold of his hand, and swore, "We shall protect you against everything from which we protect our own selves. Accept therefore our allegiance. We are warriors who have inherited the right to arms."

            This speech was interrupted by Abul-Haytham, who said, "We have ties with other men (he meant the Jews) which we should have to sever. If we do this, and Allah aids you to victory, will you not return to your own people and abandon us?"

            The apostle of Allah smiled and replied, "By no means. Blood is blood, and shedding is shedding; you belong to me and I to you'.

            I shall fight those whom you fight, and I shall be at peace with him who is at peace with you. Bring me twelve leaders who may be charged with their people's affairs." And they brought nine men from the Khazraj tribe and three from the Aus tribe.

            The apostle of Allah said to the twelve leaders' "You are the sureties for your people just as Jesus' disciples were, and I stand surety for my people." And they agreed.

            Al-Abbas asked the people, "Are you aware of the conditions on which you pledge allegiance to this man? You pledge yourselves to him, to wage war against all and sundry. If your possessions should be ruined by misfortune and your nobles slain, and you should give him up, then you will reap shame in this world and the next. If, however, you think you can keep your promises in the face of all misfortune, then it will profit you in this world and the next."

            They replied, "We shall take him even at the risk of losing all else", and turning to the apostle they asked, "But what will be our reward if we keep our promise?" He replied, " Paradise " and they said "Stretch forth thy hand", and paid homage.'

 

6- Permission to Wage War

 

When Allah gave His apostle permission to wage war, the promise to tight immediately became a condition of allegiance to Islam. This had not been so at the tirst meeting on the hillside, when homage was paid 'in the manner of women'; Allah had not then given His apostle permission to fight. He had given permission neither to wage war nor to shed blood, but only to call men to Allah, to endure insults patiently, and to pardon the ignorant. Some of the followers of the apostle had therefore been forced to flee from persecution into the countryside, some to Abyssinia, others to Medina and elsewhere. When the Quraysh rejected the mercy of Allah and spurned His prophet, they tormented or drove away men who proclaimed the One-ness of Allah, believed in His prophet, and adhered to His religion.

Allah therefore permitted Muhammad to fight and to aid his against those who tyrannized over them. The first verse which came down permitting him to wage war and to shed began, 'Permission is granted unto those who fight they have been oppressed, and Allah may aid those who have been driven from their homes merely for saying "Our Lord is Allah". The verse continued by explaining that they had committed no crime against the people except that they worshipped Allah, and when they made Islam universal they would observe the appointed times of prayer, give alms, and enjoin all men to do good and to abstain from evil. Then a further verse was recorded: Tight against them until there be no more temptation' - until Believers shall no more be tempted to abandon their religion - 'and until the religion be Allah's', that is, until Allah alone shall be worshipped and none else besides Him.          

Since permission to fight had now been granted, the apostle of Allah accepted allegiance at the second meeting on the hill only from people who swore to fight for him and his Lord against all men. He promised paradise as a reward.

'After the act of allegiance was over, Satan roared from the top of the hill in such a loud voice as I had never heard. He cried to the people of Mina [the surrounding countryside]: "Beware of this despicable apostate and his followers! Verily they are assembled to attack you!"

And the apostle of Allah replied "This is the Contemptible One of the hill. Hearken to me, o enemy of Allah! I shall make an end of thee yet!"

            When on the hill, the Helpers (in Arabic language "Ansars") swore allegiance to the apostle, to adopt Islam, to aid him and those who followed him as well as any other Muslims who might seek shelter with them, he ordered his companions and others who were with him in Mecca to emigrate to Medina , that they might meet their Helper brothers. He said: ' Allah has marked out for you kinsmen and homes where you may find refuge.' Accordingly, the Meccan followers left the city in groups. These were afterwards known as the Emigrants (in Arabic language Muhadzirs), and were then over one hundred in number.

 

(B/ Persecution of Muslims and attempt to kill the Prophet from inhabitants of Mecca disbelieving in islam)

           

But the apostle of Allah remained in Mecca, waiting for his Lord's command to leave Mecca and to migrate to Medina.

 

7- Hijra

When the Quraysh saw that the apostle of Allah had gathered a united group and had gained adherents in another country, and when they saw his companions emigrating to that country, they realized that he had found shelter and protection. Accordingly they began to fear that the apostle of Allah might join his followers, and they knew that he was now determined to fight if necessary. They therefore met to consult on what they should do.

            Satan himself greeted them at the door of their meeting-place in the guise of an aged sheikh, dressed in a cloak. When they asked him who he was, he replied, ' A sheikh who has heard of your intended discussion and has come to listen to what you say; and perhaps my opinion and advice will not be lost upon you.' So he entered with them.

Abu Jahl at last exclaimed, 'By Allah I have a plan which none of you has yet thought of, and they asked, 'What is it, o father of wisdom?'

He said, 'I propose that from every tribe we should take one young, poweriul, well-born man. To each of these, we should give a good sword with which to strike Muhammad. So we shall be delivered of him, his blood will be divided among all the tribes, and his followers will not have the strength to make war on so many.'

The sheikh said, 'I see no other plan and the people adopted the proposal and then dispersed.

            But Gabriel came to the apostle of Allah and said to him, 'Do not spend this night in thy accustomed bed.'

            When a part of the night had elapsed the conspirators assembled at Muhammad's door to watch him, intending to fall upon lie he was asleep. …

Meanwhile Abu Jahljeeringly told the waiting conspirators, 'Muhammad says that if you follow him you will become princes both of the Arabs and the non-Arabs, that you will be resurrected after death, and given gardens like the gardens of Jordan; but if you do not follow him, he will kill you and after death you will be resurrected and burn in the fires of hell.'

            The apostle went out to them and said, ' Yes! That is the truth', and Allah blinded them so that they could not see him. Then Muhammad scattered dust on their heads, recited a verse from the Koran, and went about his business.

Allah now permitted His prophet to emigrate.

 

(C/ Effort of the Prophet of peaceful obtaining Jews to Islam)

 

8- Medina

Therefore adore Allah, and associate nothing idolatrous with Him! Fear him with the fear that is His due. Carry out towards Allah all that you say you will, and love one another in the spirit of Allah, because He becomes wrathful when His covenant is broken. The peace of Allah be with you, and His mercy!'

In Medina the apostle of Allah drew up a document concerning the Emigrants and the Helpers, and the making of a treaty with the Jews which would ensure to both sides the maintenance of their religion and possessions, and laid down certain conditions of the alliance.

'In the name of Allah the merciful, the compassionate! This concerns the Believers fled from Mecca and those of Medina , as well as those who follow them; join with them, and fight with them, for they are a community excluding all other men. 'The Emigrants from Mecca shall pay blood-ransom among themselves and redeem their prisoners with the righteousness and justice suitable among Believers. The Helper tribes of Medina shall do the same. Believers shall not abandon him who is destitute among them, but shall aid him with gifts, drawn either from the ransom of prisoners or the blood-ransom paid for persons slain.

'Believers shall guard against him who rebels, or seeks to spread enmity or wickedness among them; let every man's hand be against him, even should he be the son of a Believer. No Believer shall kill another for the sake of an infidel nor aid an infidel against a Believer. Verily, the protection of Allah is indivisible and extends to the meanest Believer of all; and each must befriend other Believers above all men.

'Jews who follow us shall be given aid and equality; they shall not be oppressed, nor shall aid be given to others against them.

'The safety of Believers is indivisible; no one shall be saved at the expense of another, when battles are being fought in the name of Allah, save with equity and justice. In every religious campaign, Believers must aid one another in avenging blood spilled in the way of Allah.

'No idolater is permitted to take under his protection any property, nor any person, belonging to a Quraysh Unbeliever, or to aid a Quraysh against a Believer. He who kills a Believer will himself be killed - unless his victim's kinsmen accept blood- -ransom and it is the duty of all Believers to exact the penalty. He who aids or shelters a malefactor will earn the curse and wrath of Allah on the day of resurrection, nor will there be any escape there from. If you are at variance on any matter, refer it or to Allah or to Muhammad.

'The Jews will share the cost with the Believers as long as they fight a common foe; the Jews are one community with the Believers (but they have their own religion as the Believers have theirs). As with the Jews, so with their adherents, except for him who commits a crime.

'None shall depart to war except by the permission of Muhammad, but none shall be hindered from avenging an injury. He who does ill only brings ill upon himself and upon his family, unless he be oppressed; then Allah will justify his deed. There shall be mutual aid between Believers and Jews, in face of any who war against those who subscribe to this document, and mutual consultations and advice. No man shall injure his ally, and aid shall be granted to the oppressed. The Jews, when fighting alongside the Believers, will bear their own expenses. Medina shall be sacred territory to those who agree to this covenant.

If there should be any differences of opinion concerning this covenant and its meaning, they must be placed before Allah and Muhammad the apostle of Allah.

'Neither the Quraysh nor those who aid them are to be protected. Mutual aid will be given by Believers and Jews against who may attack Medina . If the Jews are called on by the Believers to make peace, they must comply; and if the Believers are called on by the Jews to make peace, they must agree, except in the case of a holy war. Every man shall be allotted his reward by his own tribe.

'Allah requires that this document shall be ratitied and put into effect; but it will not protect the unrighteous or the sinner. Allah protects the just and the pious, and Muhammad is the apostle of Allah'.

 

(D/ Why did Muslims reject Judaism and Christianity according to Islam)

 

            Some Jewish rabbis came one day to the apostle of Allah and said, 'Answer us four questions satisfactorily, and we shall believe in you.'

The apostle replied, 'On the covenant of Allah? Then ask what you will.'

            They asked, 'Tell us how an infant can resemble its mother, when the seed comes from the man?'

            The apostle of Allah said, 'Do you not know that the seed of a man is white and thick, whereas that of a woman is yellow and thin and that which prevails over the other imparts the resemblance They exclaimed, 'That is the truth', and continued: 'Then tell us about thy sleep.' He said, 'My eyes sleep, but my heart is awake.'

            Then they asked: 'Tell us what Israel denied himself and he replied, 'Do you not know that the food and drink he most relished was the flesh and milk of the camel; and when he fell prey to a disease and Allah delivered him, in gratitude he forswore the food and drink he liked most, the tlesh and milk of camels.'

They said, 'That is the truth.'Pak se zeptali: Then they asked, 'Tell us about the Spirit?'

He replied, 'It is Gabriel, who comes to me.'

Then the rabbis said: Agreed. But Gabriel is an enemy to us, and comes with violence and bloodshed. If this were not so we would follow thee!' …

            When the Christians of Najran came to the apostle of Allah, Jewish rabbis came also and they disputed before the apostle. One Jew said to the Christians, You are nothing!' and denied Jesus and the gospel; then a Christian said to the Jews, You are nothing and denied that Moses was a prophet, and denied the Torah.

            Then Allah revealed the following verse. 'The Jews say the Christians are nothing, and the Christians say the Jews are nothing yet they both base their arguments on scripture. They are ignorant, and Allah will judge between them on the day of the resurrection.'

            Then the Jewish rabbis disputed with the Christians of Najran saying, Abraham was no other than a Jew.'

            And the Christians from Najran said, Abraham was no other than a Christian'.

            Then Allah revealed the verse, 'Why do you quarrel about Abraham, when the Torah and the gospel were not sent down until after his time. You have disputed about things you know , why then do you dispute about things you know not? Allah knoweth, but you know not. Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian. He was an orthodox Muslim, and he was no idolater. Those closest to Abraham are those who follow him and this prophet, and those who believe. Allah is the protector of the faithful.'      Then a Christian asked Muhammad, 'Do you want to worship you as we worship Jesus, son of Mary?'

            The apostle replied, Allah forbid that I should worship anyone besides Him, or command any other besides Him to be worshipped. Allah has not sent me to do that."

9- The Qibla

 

            Seventeen months after the apostle arrived in Medina the qibla [the direction in which Muhammad and his followers faced during prayers] was changed from Jerusalem to Mecca . Several Jews came to him and taunted him: '0 Muhammad! What has turned you away from the aiblayou used to face? You allege that you follow the religion of Abraham; return, then, to the qibla of the religion of Abraham, to which you turned before, and we shall follow you and believe in you. 'But they slyly intended thus to turn him away from his religion.

            Then Allah revealed the words: Toolish men say "What hath turned them away from the qibla to which they prayed?" Reply, "Allah's is the east and the west, He leads whom He will to the straight path." 'And Allah said, 'Turn thy face to the holy mosque [the Kaba at Mecca ; and wherever you are, turn thy face tothat.'

            Once, Muadh asked some Jewish rabbis about a subject mentioned in the Torah, but they rerused to answer him about it. So Allah revealed the verse, Those who conceal what We have sent down, after We have made it plain, will be cursed by Allah.'

            Again the apostle of Allah invited the Jews, possessors of the scripture, to accept Islam and tried to enlist them in its favour; but he also threatened them with the punishment and vengeance of Allah. He was told, 'Nay. We shall follow that religion which our fathers professed, because they were more learned and better men than we are.'

            Allah the most high and glorious therefore sent down the verse which says, 'And when it is said to them 'Tollow that revelation which Allah has sent down", they say. "Nay, we shall follow that which we found our fathers practise." What? Though their fathers knew nothing, and were not rightly guided!'

            On another occasion the apostle entered a Jewish school and invited those who were present to Allah. They asked, 'What is your religion, Muhammad?' and he replied, The religion of Abraham.'

            They said, Abraham was a Jew.'

Then the apostle told them, 'Bring the Torah and let that judge between me and you', but they refused.

            One day Abu Bakr entered the schoolhouse of the Jews and found many of them assembled around a man whose name was Finhas. He was a doctor and rabbi, and had with him another rabbi called Ashya. Abu Bakr said to Finhas, 'Woe betide thee. Fear Allah, and make profession of Islam!'

            Finhas replied, "We have no need of Allah, but He has need of us! We do not beseech Him as He beseeches us. We are independent of Him, but He is not independent of us. If He were independent of us, He would not ask for our money as your master Muhammad does [for a war against Mecca ]. He forbids usury to you, but pays us interest; if He were independent of us He would give us no interest.'

            At this, Abu Bakr became angry, and struck Finhas violently, saying, 'I swear by Him in whose hands my life rests that if there were no treaty between us I would have struck off your head, you enemy of Allah!'

Then Finhas went to the apostle of Allah and said, 'See what your companion has done to me! Abu Bakr explained what happened, but Finhas denied the whole matter and said, 'I spoke no such words!' But Allah revealed a verse conrirming the words of Abu Bakr.

 

10- Rajam

 

Early in MuhammacTs stay at Medina the rabbis had met to judge a married man who had committed adultery with a Jewish woman who was also married. They said, 'Send this man and this woman to Muhammad, ask him for a judgement of the case, and let him prescribe the penalty. If he decides to condemn them to the tajbih - when criminals are scourged with a rope of date-fibres dipped in resin, then have their faces blackened and are placed on two donkeys with their faces turned towards the rump - 'then obey him, for he is a prince, and believe in him. But if he condemns them to be stoned, he is a prophet; then be on your guard against him, lest he deprive you of what you have.'

They had asked the apostle's judgement and he went to where the priests sat, and said to them, 'Bring me your learned men!" They brought him Abdullah b. Suriya, who was the most learned, though one of the youngest, among them. The apostle talked alone with him and had him confirm on oath that according to the Torah, Allah condemns to stoning the man who commits adultery after marriage'.

Suriya added, 'They know you are an inspired prophet, but they envy you!'        

Then the apostle went out and ordered the culprits to be stoned in front of the mosque. When the man felt the first stone he bent over his mistress to protect her from the stones, until they were killed. This is what Allah did for His apostle, to exact the penalty for adultery from these two persons.

            The apostle asked the Jews what had induced them to abandon of stoning for adultery, when it was prescribed in the Torah. They said the penalty had been observed until a man of royal blood (my note: apparently Biblical King David with wife of his soldier Uriah, whom then Biblical King David let kill in a fight) committed adultery, and 'the king would not allow him to be stoned. When, after this, another man committed adultery and the king desired that he be stoned, they said, "Not unless you also permit the first man to be stoned." Then all agreed to resort to scourging, and both the memory and practice of stoning died out.'

Then the apostle of Allah said, 'I was the first to revive the command of Allah, His scripture, and obedience to it.

            On another occasion a company of Jews came to the apostle Allah has created creation, but who created Allah?'

            And the apostle became so angry that his colour changed, and he leapt up in zeal for his Lord. But Gabriel came and quieted him, and said, "Calm thyself, Muhammad!" Gabriel brought a reply from Allah to what they had asked him. 'Say "He is the one god! Allah is self-generating! He begetteth not, nor is begotten! And there is none equal."

            After he had recited this to them, they said: 'Describe Him to us, o Muhammad! What is His shape? His arm - what is the strength of His arm?'

            The apostle became even more wrathful and he leapt up once more; but Gabriel again came and told him to be calm and brought a reply from Allah. 'They have not properly understood the power of Allah! He will grasp the whole earth on the day of the resurrection, and the heavens will be rolled up in His right hand! Praised be He, and exalted above all their idols'.

            A deputation of Christians from Najran, … arrived on a visit to the apostle; …

            When the delegation arrived in Medina they entered the mosque while the apostle was holding his afternoon prayers. When the time arrived for their own prayers they stood up in the mosque of the apostle and made their devotions; and the apostle of Allah said, 'It is permitted.' And they prayed with their faces towards the east.

            The three leaders, although Christians, differed among themselves on some points. They said that He was God [or Allah'], because He brought the dead to life, healed the sick, made known the unknown, created a bird from clay, breathed on and gave it life; they said that He was also the Son of God because He had no known father and spoke in His cradle, which no other human had ever done before; and they said, too, that He was the third of the Trinity, because the word of God was always We have acted, We have commanded . . .'and if God were but one, His word would be have commanded, I have created. . . ' Thus He is He, and He is Jesus and He is Mary. (note of translator to the Czech language Viktor Svobody. Biographer Ibn Ishaq regarded Mary as part of the Christian Trinity, as it is indirectly in Koran verse 5:116)

 

11-The Trinity

 

The apostle said to them, 'Resign yourself to the will of Allah, and they replied, 'We did so before thee".

'You lie! said Muhammad. 'You say that Allah has a son, you worship the cross, and you eat the flesh of pigs; these prohibit you from submission.'

Then Allah revealed the Sura known as The Family ojlmran which begins by refuting the Christian Trinity, and proclaiming omnipotence and one-ness of Allah. There is no god but He, the Living, the Eternal who cannot die; but Jesus died and was crucified. Allah has sent down the Koran, the criterion of truth and falsehood in matters of difference over Jesus and others. Those who disbelieve the directions of Allah will suffer grievous punishment; for Allah is mighty and avenging. Nothing is hidden from Allah on earth or in heaven and He knows what the Christians intend with their claims that Jesus is Lord and God. But Allah formed Jesus in the womb - this the Christians do not deny - as He formed other human beings; how, then, can Jesus be god?

It is Allah who has sent down the scripture with clear and categorical verses at the core. But other verses are obscure and convoluted and can be explained in several ways; and these are sent by Allah to test men. Those in whose hearts there is per- versity expound their own interpretation of them as if it were categorical truth, or clothe their own inventions in the obscurity of the verses. But truthrul men balance the clear verses with the obscure and thus the parts of the scripture clarify each other; the argument is plain, the justification becomes evident, falsehood is removed, and unbelief is defeated.

Although Allah gave Jesus powers of various kinds (on the basis of which the Christians believe him to be God), it was in order to make him a sign to mankind, to rurnish them with proofs of his prophetic mission. But Allah held back many manifestations of His dominion and power, such as the succession of day by night and night by day, and bringing forth the living from the dead and the dead from the living. Over none of these matters did He give power to Jesus, but all of these would have been at his disposal had he been God; instead, he fled from kings, from country to country.  

Then Allah explained to them the origins of Jesus. Allah selected Adam and Noah, and the family of Abraham and the family of Imran above all other men, in successive generations. The wife of Imran dedicated the child in her womb to Allah and when she was delivered of it she said, 'O Lord, I have brought forth a daughter. I have called her Mary, and I commend her and her issue to Thy protection.' Allah accepted her graciously, and made her grow to a goodly woman.

Then the angels said to her: Allah has chosen thee and has purified thee. He has chosen thee above all other women. Bend down to the Lord and worship!'

She said: Lord! How can I have a child when no man has touched me.'

He said: 'Allah createth what He pleaseth, Then He said: 'We shall teach him the scripture, and wisdom and the Torah - which had been with them from the time of Moses -'and the gospel. And he will be an apostle to the children of Israel , saying, "I have come to you with a sign from your Lord. Allah is my Lord and your Lord, and I shall heal those who are blind from birth, and lepers. And I shall revive the dead with the permission of Allah, and will tell you of what you eat, and what you store up in your houses. Herein will be a sign for you that I am an apostle from Allah, if ye are believers in the Torah.'"

Allah took Jesus to Himself when they had determined to kill him. 'They devised a stratagem, and Allah devised a stratagem but Allah is the best deviser of stratagems.' Allah lifted him up and purified him; 'the likeness of Jesus with Allah is as the likeness of Adam, whom He created of dust, saying 'Be" And he was. I created Adam of dust, without the intervention of man or woman, and he became - like Jesus - flesh, blood, hair, and skin. So the creation of Jesus without a man is no more wonderful than that of Adam.'

After hearing this, the Christians said to Muhammad, Allow us to consider the matter and let us then return to tell you what we mean to do.' Then they discussed in private and Abdul Masih said: 'You know that Muhammad is an inspired prophet; and no nation ever cursed a prophet without its chiefs dying, and the number of its children diminishing. If you do this, you will perish; but if you do not curse him and yet wish to stay in your own religion, then take leave of the man and return to your own country. ' Accordingly, they went to the apostle and said to him, "We have decided to leave you in your religion, and to remain in our own; but send one of your companions with us and let him judge among us concerning all differences of property that may arise; for we are impressed with you.' The apostle of Allah agreed to their request.

 

(above mentioned see p. 37-58)

 

(E/ Killing of in Islam disbelieving Arabs and Jews in Islam by Muslims at Prophet's time)

 

12 -First Caravan

 

When Allah made plunder permissible He allowed four parts to those who had won it, and one part to Himself and to His apostle, exactly as Abdullah had done with the captured caravan.

This was the occasion when the first booty was taken by the Muslims, when the first prisoners were taken by the Muslims and when the first man was slain by the Muslims. It was eighteen months since the Emigrants had arrived in Medina.

 

(above mentioned see p. 61)

 

18- Banu Qurayza

 

… The apostle of Allah besieged the Qurayza for twenty-five days until they were distressed, and Allah struck fear into their hearts.

… Kab, their chief, spoke to them thus. I have three suggestions … We can obey this man and believe in him; for it is plain that he is an inspired prophet. In this case, your lives, property and children will be secure.' They replied, 'We shall never abandon the commandments of the Torah, nor substitute any others for them.'

He went on, 'If you reject this, we can kill our children and women, and go out to Muhammad and his companions with drawn swords; then God will decide between us and Muhammad. If we perish, we shall perish without leaving orphans who might suffer evil, but if we are victorious, I swear we shall take their wives and their children!'

They rejoined, 'Should we kill these poor creatures? What would life be to us without them?'

He said, 'If you reject this, too, then consider. This is the Sabbath night, and it is possible that Muhammad thinks he is secure. Let us therefore make a sortie, and we may surprise him and his men.'

But they answered, 'Shall we desecrate the Sabbath, and do on the Sabbath what none has done before save those who were afterwards transformed into apes?'

Kab said at last, 'Not a man of you has, from the time his mother gave him birth, been able to hold firm to a decision for even one single night'

In the morning the Qurayza came down from their fort to surrender to the apostle of Allah, and the Aus begged that - as the apostle had dealt leniently with allies of the Khazraj - he would do the same for the allies of the Aus. The apostle said, 'Would you like one of your own people to decide their fate' and they welcomed it. He continued, 'Then let Sad b. Muadh decide.' Sad had been struck by an arrow in the defence of the Ditch, so his people mounted him on a donkey - with a leather pillow under him, for he was a stout and handsome man ...

Then Sad asked, 'Do you covenant with Allah to abide by my decision?' and they said, 'We do!' The apostle of Allah also replied, 'Yes.'

And Sad pronounced the following sentence, 'I decree that the men be killed, the property be divided, and the women with their children be made captives.'

The apostle of Allah imprisoned the Qurayza in Medina while trenches were dug in the market-place. Then he sent for the men and had their heads struck off so that they fell in the trenches. They were brought out in groups, and among them was Kab, the chief of the tribe. In number, they amounted to six or seven hundred, although some state it to have been eight or nine hundred. All were executed. …

Aisha, the wife of the apostle, said, 'Only one of their women was killed. By Allah! She was with me, talking and laughing, while the apostle slaughtered her countrymen in the marketplace; and when her name was called, I asked, "What is this for?" and she replied, "I am going to be slain!" I asked why and she answered, "For something I have done! " Then she was taken away, and her head was struck off. But I shall never cease to marvel at her good humour and laughter, although she knew that she was to die."

She was the woman who threw a millstone down from the Qurayza fort and killed a Believer.

Now the apostle distributed the property of the Banu Qurayza, as well as their women and children, to the Muslims, reserving one-fifth for himself

After the Qurayza had been slain, and their possessions dispersed, the wound of Sad opened again and he died a martyr. In the middle of the night Gabriel, wearing a turban of gold brocade, came to the apostle, and asked, 'Who is this dead man for whom the gates of heaven stand ajar and for whom the throne quivers with joy?' At this, the apostle rose in haste and went to Sad, but he found him dead.

 

(above mentioned see p. 82-84)

 

(F/ Prophet's poisoning by captured apparently Jewish woman)

 

20- Khaybar

 

… After the apostle of Allah had rested, the captive woman Zaynab brought him a roasted sheep. She had asked what portion of the sheep the apostle of Allah most enjoyed and, having been told that it was the leg, she put much poison into it, although she also poisoned the whole sheep. When she placed it before the apostle he took a bite, but did not swallow; Bishr likewise took a piece, but he did swallow. Then the apostle of Allah spat his out, saying, 'This bone informs me that it is poisoned.' He summoned the woman, who confessed what she had done, and asked, 'What made thee do this?'

She replied, 'It is no secret to thee, what my people feel towards thee. I said to myself, "If he be only a king, we shall be delivered of him; but if he be a prophet, he will know of the poison and guard himself" The apostle released her, but Bishr died of the piece he had eaten.

During his last sickness, years later, the apostle said, 'I feel the vein of my heart bursting from the food I ate at Khaybar'; from these words, Muslims conclude that the apostle died a martyr of battle, as well as being favoured by Allah with the dignity of prophetic office.

 

(above mentioned see p. 90-91)

 

(G/ Declaration of partial release from performing any contracts with idolaters, Islam as a religion of Abraham and other most important rules of Islamic law)

 

25-Tabuk

 

… When Abu Bakr and the Muslims who accompanied him had departed the Declaration ojimmunity was sent down by Allah. It proclaimed that Allah and His apostle, after this pilgrimage, were absolved from observance of all treaties which they had previously made with idolaters. Therefore if you [the idolaters] repent, this will be better for you; but if you turn your backs, know that you cannot weaken Allah! And warn those who disbelieve that there will be grievous punishment. An exception shall be made for those idolaters who have not infringed treaties, and who have given no one aid against My prophet. Their treaties shall be observed until their terms expire, because Allah loves those who are pious.

'When four months have elapsed, the instruction to Muhammad continued, 'kill the idolaters wherever you find them; make them prisoners, surround them, and besiege them wherever they may be. But if they repent and pray according to the command of Allah and pay the tax, then set them free, because Allah is forgiving and merciful.'

When the Declaration ojimmunity was revealed to the apostle, he sent for Ali and said to him, … Say "No intidel can enter paradise, and after this year no idolater will be allowed to make the pilgrimage, or walk around the Kaba naked; he who has a treaty with the apostle of Allah may depend on it, until its appointed span!"'

...

            Then Allah promised to recompense the Believers for the trade they would lose through pursuing this course, and assigned to them tax and tributes levied from the Jews and Christians. He spoke of the wickedness and superstition of those who lived according to the Old and New Testaments, saying, 'Priests and monks devour the property of men, in vanity, and obstruct the way of Allah. For those who lay up gold and silver, and spend it not in rurthering the word of Allah, there will be grievous chastisement.' Then he said, 'The number of months is twelve in the book of Allah since the day He created the heavens and the earth, and four of these months are sacred [war is forbidden in them]. This is the true religion. Do not therefore act unrighteously in them as the idolaters have done.'

            Then he spoke of the distribution of property. Alms are due to the poor, and the needy; to those whose hearts are to be won over; for the redemption of slaves, and the freeing of debtors; to further the word of Allah, and to give to travellers. This is an ordinance from Allah, and Allah knows all and is wise."

            '0, prophet! Wage war against the Unbelievers and against the Hypocrites who utter belief but have none, and be severe unto them, for their abode shall be in hell.

            The Arabs had delayed professing Islam until they saw how the affair between the apostle and the Quraysh would end, because the Quraysh were the leaders of men, the people of the Kaba and of the sacred territory, and they were acknowledged as the descendants of Ishmael, son of Abraham. Not one chief of the Arabs denied this. But when Mecca was conquered and the Quraysh submitted to Islam, the Arabs knew that they themselves were not strong enough to wage war or to show enmity to the apostle of Allah. So they entered into the religion of Allah in droves, arriving from all directions.

            The apostle gave many other instructions. And he commanded Amr to take one-fifth of any booty for Allah, as well as the legal alms from the land. These consisted of 'one-tenth from land irrigated by springs and rains; one-twentieth from land irrigated with buckets. For every ten camels, two sheep; for every twenty camels, four sheep; for every forty horned cattle, one cow; for every thirty, one male or female calf entering its third year; for every forty sheep, a young one old enough to graze alone. This is an ordinance from Allah ordained to Believers as the required alms; but he who is more generous will win merit. Any Jew or Christian who persists in his religion is not to be turned away from it, but must pay one golden dinar or its equivalent in cloth. He who pays this will be protected by Allah, and His prophet; he who refuses is an enemy of Allah and His prophet, as well as of all Believers.

(H/ Sacrificing animals in Islam and during the Prophet's last pilgrimage both Prophet's possible ban on the Islamic pilgrimage and apparent killing sacrificial animals by the Prophet himself)

 

… In the next year, the tenth of the Hijra [AD 630], the apostle made preparations for the pilgrimage, and ordered his people to do the same. He took with him sacriricial animals, and ordered that all the people (except those who had brought sacriticial animals) should, after visiting the holy places, divest themselves of their pilgrim habit. Then he entered Mecca , and all the people who had brought no sacrificial animals divested themselves of their pilgrim habit.

The apostle of Allah had sent Ali to Najran, and Ali returned to Mecca to rejoin the apostle during the pilgrimage. He gave him a report on the journey to Najran and the apostle then said, 'Go and walk round the Kaba; then divest thyself of the state of pilgrim as thy friends have done.'

But Ali said, 'When I assumed the state of a pilgrim, I said, "I dedicate myself to Thee, Allah, as Thy apostle Muhammad has done." ' Ali had no sacrificial animals, so the apostle of Allah gave him part of his own. And the apostle of Allah slaughtered the sacrifices in both their names.

 

(I/ Uncertain next meeting of Muslims with the Prophet, other most important rules of Islamic law about usury, about women, about the brotherhood of all men in Islam and the Prophet's last pilgrimage)

 

During this pilgrimage the apostle of Allah … After giving praise to Allah, he said, 'Listen to my words, because I do not know whether I shall meet you again here after this occasion. … Whoever has charge of another persohs wealth, let him return it to the man who has deposited it. Usury is forbidden, but capital belongs to you. Do no wrong, and none shall wrong you.

… You have rights over your wives, and they have rights over you. Your rights over them are that they shall allow no one of whom you disapprove to enter your bed, nor must they commit open fornication; if they commit it, Allah permits you to exclude them from your beds, and to beat them. Treat your wives well, because they cannot fend for themselves; you have taken them on trust from Allah, and they are yours by the grace of Allah.

… Know that every Muslim is brother to every Muslim. No man may take anything from his brother save what is freely given.'

Thus the apostle terminated his pilgrimage. This was the pilgrimage of instruction and valediction, because after it the apostle of Allah went no more on pilgrimage. It was 'The Farewell Pilgrimage'.

 

(J/ Prophet's companions should not resist the Prophet as his disciples resisted Jesus)

 

… He said to his companions, 'Do not resist me as his disciples resisted Jesus.'

His companions asked, 'How did the disciples resist?'

He said, 'He sent them as I send you; but those whom he sent to a place near by were pleased, and obeyed, whereas those whom he sent to a distance, went unwillingly and considered it a hardship. Jesus complained to Allah; and everyone who had considered it a hardship was the next morning able to speak the language of the nation to whom he had been sent.'

 

(above mentioned see p. 108-112)

 

(K/ Prophet's death, its causes, his treatment refusal, his possible fictitious death or his resurrection, Muslims as a scourge of God and the Prophet's wives)

 

26- Last Illness

 

            … The total-number of the apostle's wives was thirteen.

            … With these eleven wives the apostle consummated his marriages. Two died before him, namely Khadija and Zaynab (…who had been the wife of his freed slave, Zayd, who divorced her that she might wed the apostle …), but nine survived him. With two others he did not consummate marriage: with Asma, who had the white spots of leprosy and whom he sent back to her family; and with Amra, who had lately been an Unbeliever and who fled to Allah for refuge from the apostle of Allah. He said, 'Who tlees for refuge to Allah is well protected', and sent her back to her family.

… Then he said, 'Allah has given one of His servants the choice between this world and the next, and he has chosen to be with Allah.'

Abu Bakr understood these words and knew that he meant himself; so he wept, saying, 'Nay. We shall give our own lives and those of our children for thine.'

            … He commanded the Emigrants to treat the Helpers well, saying, 'Other groups increase, but the Helpers must remain the same in number and cannot increase. They were my asylum and gave me shelter. Be kind to those who are kind to them, and punish those who injure them.' Then the apostle entered his house, and the sickness overcame him so that he fainted.

            The wives of the apostle gathered to consult, and all agreed that they ought to pour medicine into his mouth. The uncle of the apostle, al-Abbas, offered to pour it himself.

When the apostle recovered from his swoon he asked, 'Who has done this to me?' and they replied, 'Thy uncle'

He said, 'This is a medicine brought by women from Abyssinia . Why have you done this?'

Then his uncle replied, 'We feared thy having pleurisy', and the apostle said, 'That is a disease with which Allah the most high and glorious has not afflicted me! Let no one remain in this house without swallowing some of this medicine, except my uncle.' Accordingly even Maymuna swallowed some - although she was fasting at the time - because the apostle swore that all must taste it as a punishment for what they had done to him.

            According to Aisha, „… Then I found that he was becoming heavy in my lap, and I looked at him and saw that his eyes were turned upwards; and he said, "Nay! Rather the companion in paradise! " I had often heard the apostle say, " Allah takes no prophet away without giving him a choice", and when he died his last words were, "Rather the companion in paradise".

Then I thought, "He has not chosen our companionship". And I said to him, "The choice was thine, and I swear by Him who sent thee that thou hast chosen what is right." Then the apostle of Allah died, at noon on Monday.

            Now Umar rose before the people and said, 'Some Hypocrites say that the apostle of Allah is dead! He has not died, but has departed to his Lord, just as Moses left his people for forty days, and returned to them when it was rumoured he was dead. By Allah! The apostle will return just as Moses did, and the hands and feet of the men who have said that the apostle is dead will be cut off!'

            Abu Bakr arrived, and alighted at the door of the mosque while Umar was talking thus. But he took no notice, and went in to see the body of the apostle in the house of Aisha. It was laid out and shrouded with a striped mantle. This he removed from the face of the apostle and, kissing it, said, 'Thou art to me as my father and mother! Thou hast tasted the death which Allah decreed for thee; but after it, no death will ever come to thee again.' …

            When Abu Bakr saw that he would not listen he himself turned to the people, who left Umar and came to him. Then he gave praise to Allah and said, Let all who adored Muhammad know that Muhammad is dead, and let all who adore Allah know that Allah is eternal and never dies.' Then he recited the verse 'Muhammad is but an apostle. Other apostles have passed away before him. If he die or be slain will ye turn back? He who turns back does no injury to Allah; and Allah will surely reward those who give thanks.' And it was as if the people had never heard this verse until Abu Bakr recited it then.

            … So, fearing dissension, I cried to Abu Bakr to stretch out his own hand and I paid him homage. Then all paid him homage.'

Finally, Abu Bakr spoke again. He said, 'I am appointed to govern you, although I am not the best of you. If I act well you must aid me, and if I act unjustly you must correct me. Truth is faithfulness and falsehood is treachery! No nation has failed to fight for Allah but Allah has punished it with abasement; nor has wickedness become widespread without Allah sending calamity. Obey me as long as I obey Allah and His prophet! But should I rebel against Allah and His prophet you will owe me no obedience! Rise to your prayers and may Allah have mercy on you'

Abu Ubayda was accustomed to dig graves plainly, according to the fashion of Mecca, but Abu Talha, the grave-digger of Medina, dug them in a vaulted shape. Al-Abbas therefore called two men, and said to one of them, 'Go to Abu Ubayda', and to the other, 'Go to Abu Talha.' He added, Allah, choose for Thy apostle.' Abu Ubayda could not be found, but the man who went to Abu Talha found him and brought him; so he dug the grave of the apostle in the Medina fashion.

According to Aisha, the apostle had said when he was dying, 'The curse of Allah is on a nation which makes the graves of its prophets into places of worship', but he knew that his own followers would do this. And it was true, for when the apostle died a great calamity befell the Muslims. Aisha, who survived the apostle forty-seven years, recorded, 'When the apostle of Allah died many Arabs relapsed into idolatry; Judaism and Christianity rose again, and Hypocrisy became common, so that the Muslims seemed like a flock of sheep on a wintry night, because of the loss of their prophet. Then Allah roused them again under Abu Bakr.'

 

(above mentioned see p. 114-118)

 

23) 28/05/2016 Why it is better to eat gradually only certain plant fruits and certain plant seeds, and why it is better to eat only in extreme need on principle gradually certain eggs, certain carrions also of animals, certain blood or parts of by it not killed certain whole plants or then either other parts of certain plants or whole certain plants and only then certain milk and about cause of probable slaughter of the Canaanites including women and also young children in the book of Joshua by the Jews and about the right apparently Mongolian way of breeding of dairy cattle.

 

quoted:


Post of Dalibor Grůza

 

PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE

PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:

„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." All the rest consists more in views (speculations).

 

Article I.

Eternal duty of all living creatures

(1) Fundamental duty of all living creatures is to cause the least possible death and pain. The perfect living creature eats then only plant fruits and plant seeds from all living creatures. (Further also eternal duty of members).

...

(4) Member has right also to eat only gradually in extreme emergency (especially from serious health reasons) eggs, in extreme emergency carrions of living creatures died of natural causes, on principle of old age, or in extreme emergency collected blood of non-slaughtered animals and humans and milk, or in extreme emergency plants, all always the most mercifully as possible bred and killed, and products purely from them. Philosophy of Balance p. 22


 

It is right to eat plant fruits, even when plant fruit contains from thousands to millions, less probably to billions of living cells, plant fruit is not multicellular living organism, i.e. multicellular living system, therefore, even in its case we cause death of relatively many living cells, so in case of eating, i.e. killing of plant fruits from organic (i.e. ecological or bio) farming or from agricultural integrated production (during this cultivation of plants is limited to the highest possible level killing, especially killing of insects by both sprays, especially by chemical sprays and fertilization, especially by chemical fertilization) we cause their nearly no pain, because only living multicellular organism is more able to feel pain, the evolutionarily more perfect organism is, the more it feels pain. Furthermore gradually it is right to eat plant seeds, plant seed contains apparently less living cells than plant fruit, but plant seed is already the germ, i.e. simplest living multicellular organism of relatively simple living multicellular organism, which is more mature plant, so when eating, i.e. killing of plant seeds from organic farming or from agricultural integrated production we cause their nearly no pain, even though the plant seed apparently feels more pain than plant fruit.

 

Furthermore gradually in extreme need it is right to eat hen egg from a home breed, where they do not slaughter or do not get slaughtered any hens and cocks, egg contains apparently less living cells than the plant fruit and plant seed, if it is an unfertilized egg, then according to exact biology this egg contains only a single animal living cell, but they are often already the fertilized hen eggs in the earliest embryonic stage of their development because of the presence of the cock in my hen flock, then this egg can contain several animal cells, in case of egg in the earliest embryonic stage of its development it is so the simplest animal living unicellular or multicellular organism which apparently feels a little more pain than plant fruit or plant seed.

 

Furthermore gradually in extreme need it is right to eat cadaver of living creature also of animal, if it eating living creature in my up to now life experience probably with the exception of Satan (i.e. Devil embodying according to the Philosophy of Balance all death in our Universe or in the final consequence the most possible perfect vacuum, i.e. the most possible perfect nothing in our Universe) did not intentionally kill this eaten living creature or did not let intentionally kill this eaten living creature, on principle this eaten living creature died of natural causes, on principle of old age (hereinafter referred to also as “carrion”), this carrion often contains billions up to in the case of carrion of animal trillions of living cells, however after death also the believed higher animal does not form an independent living organism, because the death of brain leads to the decomposition of the living organism of both believed higher animal and other animals and to the emergence of chaos in the body of these living creatures, even though for some time after brain death of this living creature the individual living cells of his or her or its body survive, therefore cadaver of living creature and also of each animal feel pain at a similar level as the aforementioned plant fruit, the aforementioned plant seed or the aforementioned hen egg in the earliest embryonic stage of its development. Obtaining of the aforementioned carrion died of natural causes, on principle of old age is very difficult and demanding a relatively large amount of finances, I gain these carrions from my shelter for broilers (so called hens and cocks both by humans adapted for obtaining meat), which have not been killed intentionally by any human and which died on principle of old age (these carrions of broilers I eat in extreme need after the veterinary autopsy and boiled in several as a matter of principle in two waters).

 

Furthermore gradually in extreme need it is right to eat the collected within health well-refillable blood of living animals or also of humans, however at present time I do not eat this blood, blood contains from thousands, millions to billions, in the case of large amount of blood weighing at least in the tens of grams up to trillions of living cells, but blood does not form any independent living organism, therefore blood feels pain at a similar level as the aforementioned plant fruit, the aforementioned plant seed, the aforementioned hen egg in the earliest embryonic stage of its development, or the aforementioned carrion of living creature. Or in the same grade in extreme need it is right to eat part of by it not killed plant from organic farming or from agricultural integrated production, these parts of plants gradually themselves will renew, this renewable part of plant contains from thousands, millions to billions, in the case of large amount of plant material weighing at least in the tens of grams up to trillions of living cells, but this renewable part of plant does not form any independent living organism, therefore when removing this renewable part from plant this plant or this renewable part of plant feel pain at a similar level as when collecting the aforementioned blood from the body of a living creature.

 

Furthermore gradually in extreme need it is right to eat whole plant or other part of by it killed whole plant on principle from organic farming or from agricultural integrated production than the aforementioned plant fruit or the aforementioned plant seed or the aforementioned part of by it not killed whole plant, because whole plant apparently contains up to trillions of living cells, eg. in the case of adult tree, and the whole plant is evolutionarily more perfect living (multicellular) organism than plant seed or hen egg in the earliest embryonic stage of its development, and therefore from the above reasons killing of whole plant causes more both death and pain of plant than death and pain are caused in case of eating of the aforementioned plant fruit, of the aforementioned plant seed, of the aforementioned hen egg in the earliest embryonic stage of its development, of the aforementioned carrion, of the aforementioned blood or of the aforementioned milk or of the aforementioned part of by it not killed whole plant.

 

Or only then in extreme need it is right to eat milk (i.e. milk of animal mammal) from breed, where on principle they do not intentionally kill (i.e. do not slaughter) or do not let intentionally kill any male or female, apparently on principle milk contains no living cell and therefore milk does not form any living organism, however it is necessary for periodical obtaining milk, that the female of animal mammal were periodically pregnant and periodically gave birth to babies, while large quantity of milk requires permanent birth of a large amount of babies of mammals, of which however half are males, that do not give any milk, and one male mammal can fertilize up to one hundred and perhaps more female mammals, therefore at present time is and also in the past was the vast majority of male mammals  killed very soon after their birth, so it is not necessary to feed them (therefore apparently Jews, i.e. Semitic tribe, i.e. shepherds who settled in extreme need of starvation and death in Egypt near the Egyptians, i.e. ploughmen /i.e. tillers of ground/, /these Jews/ also caused in Egypt much death and pain in the way that they tried to enslave the Egyptians through usury by counselor of Pharaoh, Jew Joseph and then vice versa for several centuries the Egyptians enslaved the Jews, who reproduced greatly in Egypt, and apparently therefore, when Moses liberated the enslaved Jews from Egypt, these Jews massacred other apparently Semitic tribes of the Canaanites, apparently also shepherds including their women and also very young children, who apparently also bred in large number especially sheep for milk like the Jews before their departure to Egypt and therefore apparently these Canaanites also murdered a large number of male sheep, on principle the lambs at a very young age, i.e. in substance very young children of sheep, but it was not also without consequences for the Jews and the German Nazis caused apparently as vendetta for this massacre of the Canaanites and for the Jewish previous pastoral slaughter of lambs a similar massacre of Jews including their women and also very young children in time about 3300 years later), therefore at present time causes and also in the past caused also the milk from the above mentioned foods the most pain and death than the aforementioned plant fruit, the aforementioned plant seed, the aforementioned hen egg in the earliest embryonic stage of its development, the aforementioned carrion or the aforementioned blood (the right solution to the problem of both milk and breeding of dairy cattle is a solution apparently used by the Mongolian shepherds up to present, it is to eat instead of milk on principle the above mentioned blood of dairy cattle, it is blood of both its females and its males, this blood can be regularly taken from the vein of this dairy cattle without its slaughter and therefore it is possible to breed both its females and its males until their natural death, principally of old age and only then to eat them), even if the milk is no living creature anyway, but complete prohibiting females of living creatures also of mammals from having babies would also cause great mental pain especially of these females also of mammals, because giving birth of offspring is for these females in fact the most important sense and mission of their lives.

 

All, what according to the above mentioned I eat, should always be the most mercifully as possible bred and killed, and furthermore I eat products purely from this all. According to the exact science of biology the human, believed higher animal, other animal or plant are formed by the same living cells, by so called eukaryotic living cells.

 

24) 04/06/2016 My Devillogy in my up to now personal life experience, i.e. the Old Testament Yahweh as Satan, i.e. Satan as both the tempter and executioner of all living creatures also of Jews (i.e. also in relation to Jews telling both partly truth and partly lies) and in all these completely serving New Testament charitable only one God, communism, about women as a tool of the Devil, i.e. Satan or why eg. also Hindus probably publicly lie about killing animals.

 

quoted:


Job 2King James Version (KJV): 1 Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the Lord.… 4 And Satan answered the Lord, and said, Skin for skin, yea, all that a man hath will he give for his life. 5 But put forth thine hand now, and touch his bone and his flesh, and he will curse thee to thy face. 6 And the Lord said unto Satan, Behold, he is in thine hand; but save his life. 7 So went Satan forth from the presence of the Lord, and smote Job with sore boils from the sole of his foot unto his crown. Bible see https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?version=KJV&search=Job%202

 

Matthew 4King James Version (KJV):  8 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; 9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me. 10 Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. 11 Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him. Bible see https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?version=KJV&search=Matthew%204

 

In Jewish tradition, Death was referred to as the Angel of Life and Death (Malach HaMavet) or the Angel of Dark and Light stemming from the Bible and Talmudic lore. The Bible itself does refer to the "Angel of Life and Death" when he reaps Egypt's firstborns, but he is not connected to Satan. There is also a reference to "Abaddon" (The Destroyer), an Angel who is known as the "Angel of the Abyss". In Talmudic lore, he is characterized as archangel Samael. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Death_(personification)&oldid=576001771

 

Samael (Hebrew: סמאל‎) (also Sammael and Samil) is an important archangel in Talmudic and post-Talmudic lore, a figure who is accuser, seducer and destroyer, and has been regarded as both good and evil. It is said that he was the guardian angel of Esau and a patron of the Roman empire. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samael

 

English-Greek dictionary: mother-μητέρα (mitéra), Sun- ήλιος (ílios, helios), substance  in Czech language “látka”- ύλη (ýli, hylé), toucht (small quantity)- μικρή ποσότητα (mikrí posótita, μικρό- mikró-small), English-Latin dictionary: matter or mass, in Czech language “hmota”-materia, mother-mater


 

My Philosophy of Balance implies, that Satan or the Devil embodies the most possible perfect absolute vacuum in our Universe and because nothing, i.e. absolute vacuum cannot kill anyone, but its underpressure can attract a mass to collide and to destroy it mutually by this collision, so Satan embodies also all death of live creatures in our Universe. According to the above mentioned biblical quotation Satan is simultaneously the tempter and simultaneously the executioner apparently in the service of only one God, therefore Satan tempts while then punishes living creatures apparently only with God's consent, so Satan apparently teaches living creatures to distinguish still more and more perfectly between good and evil, thus charity from non-charity, which is the basis of evolution or historical improvement of all living creatures, Satan partly tells lies and partly tells the truth, Satan cannot be apparently defeated by non-charity, eg. non-charitable violence, deceits, lies etc., because in matters of violence, deceits, lies etc. Satan is apparently invincible, because he probably serves only one God, i.e. charity in the most perfect way of all living creatures by all those, thus at least in our Universe there is Satan the most perfect violent executioner, cheater or liar, Satan is probably subordinate only to only one God, i.e. charity, therefore Satan can be defeated apparently only by charity, however Satan cannot apparently be killed (without death nearly all living creatures would apparently starve and die), Satan apparently can never act contrary to the God 's will and he must always obey only one God, because even though according to me Satan himself tells lies or he himself kills both as little as possible (in the case that Satan embodies the most perfect but still imperfect absolute vacuum in our Universe) or according to me he himself only lets to tell lies or only lets to kill both as little as possible (in the case that Satan embodies the perfect absolute vacuum in our Universe), so he apparently always acts in accordance with God's will as God's both tempter and executioner and therefore only one God apparently always protects him. The strongest temptations by Satan are pride and delusion of grandeur, when Satan and living creature especially people after the death, that belong to Satan, propose to a live creature, on principle to the human before death, that this living creature can replace Satan as the embodiment of death, i.e. the Angel of death of other living creatures due to alleged perfect knowledge or skills of this living creature before death (however Satan apparently does not have any other belief than he must fulfill his role given to him by only one God to tempt the living creatures and to punish these living creature succumbed to the temptations while he must always obey the only one God, i.e. charity), see the above mentioned proposition of Satan to Jesus, that Satan will give him all the kingdoms of the Earth, and if an imperfect creature, on principle imperfect human before death accepted it, so one can expect big loss of him or her or it, because imperfect living creature is not capable to resolve without the help of Satan, virtually without the help of only one God rightly (i.e. within causing of the least possible death and pain) that some living creature should die, that other living creatures ate it or him or her (because at present time living creatures can eat only other living creatures) and other living creatures, possibly according to my Rational Mystique after the death (but also they are not apparently completely dead and also they must apparently eat something) will become more and more very hate this imperfect living creature, this pride and grandeur delusion succumbed living creature, that is very troubled by his or her or its conscience, will remain nothing other than to admit his or her or its powerlessness and apparently to ask Satan, i.e. the Angel of death, who before it this pride and grandeur delusion succumbed living creature often tried to kill, that Satan takes his place again, and then this living creature will lose vast majority of his or her or its freedom, which he or she or it had at the time, when he or she or it has not tried to kill Satan yet, and then it is for this living creature much harder and riskier not to subordinate fully to the commands of Satan, therefore to distinguish between good and evil in the commands of Satan and to serve only one God, i.e. charity and so not to be fully a slave to commands of Satan as his or her or its supreme leader, although the service to only one God, i.e. charity ( i.e. according to my Philosophy of Balance permanent causing the least possible death and pain) the Devil, i.e. Satan and other similar serfs of Satan (i.e. according to my Rational Mystique living creatures in hell after death) still in fact expects from the new punished living creature in hell, and which can only save and free the serf of Satan from Satan's hell.

 

Communism of Jewish Karl Marx or otherwise by him called scientific materialism in fact solves in its essence the ancient question, if the first living creature or the human were created by God from nonliving matter or the first living creature or the human were born from a mother (see the Latin word “materia” - matter or mass /in Czech language “hmota”, in Czech language originally apparently from two Greek word roots “h–mota”/ derived from the above mentioned both Latin word “mater”-mother or Greek word “mitéra“ -mother and in Czech language probably also from the Greek word “ilios“ or „helios“ /”h-elios“/ - the Sun). Because every mother considers as the main role of a father to procure for her offspring the foods and material facilities but on the other hand also their safety, but on principle the foods are cadavers of living creatures and on principle facilities for children have also material form built either from cadavers of living creatures or from inanimate matter, because on principle intangible things cannot be eaten and it is not possible to build material facilities for their joint family from them, therefore on principle every mother understands a male, especially human male above all as a hunter or warrior or butcher, whose task is to kill or let kill other living creatures, which however, if it is not within causing the least possible death and pain, causes unnecessary hatred of these killed living creatures against this male - butcher, as well as against mother's, virtually father's children, in the latter case so from the perspective of a mother such a male - butcher unnecessarily endangers the safety of her children and therefore a woman will refuses him or it. Therefore all intangible things has the importance for the mother of children, virtually for all women on principle only from the perspective, if these intangible things ensure for her children material things, so from this perspective the women apparently judge all both creations and discoveries produced on principle by masculine humans in matters of religion, philosophy, social and also of natural sciences. The only exception is then sunlight, which according to modern exact physical science consists exclusively of photons, which have zero rest mass, it means, that these photons are intangible in their stationary state, thus at present time on principle we cannot eat intangible things, however without this in rest state intangible sunlight could probably be no life on Earth, it means, that on the Earth there would not be the plants that obtain their energy from light through photosynthesis, with no plants on the Earth there would be no both herbivores and insects that eat plants, without herbivores and insects on the Earth there would be also no carnivores. Communism of Jewish Karl Marx expressed it by a simple but apparently wrong idea, “at the earliest we need to fill stomachs of people and just then we can be interested in any intangible things like religion, philosophy, human rights, rights of other living creatures etc., then the result of this its apparently wrong materialistic ideology was that in the communistic, virtually socialistic States the choice of foods gradually decreased and there was also less and less amount of food there until circa 1990 AD, when after 70 years of its existence the communism, virtually socialism of Karl Marx conceived as a human class struggle and fight against other living creatures for the life and death (of which result was a large death and pain, virtually hatred of other living creatures than humans according to the Philosophy of Balance, but in large amount the large hatred also of people who dissented from this communist politics or from its leader) has lost its political power in nearly all States of the world. In spite of it from perspective of the Philosophy of Balance, virtually its charitylogy the following corrected communistic idea worth considering, which could be expressed "to each living creature according to his or her or its both present and anticipated future charitable needs", according to this by Philosophy of Balance corrected communistic idea we cannot refuse and State must protect the also large riches of certain individuals and also inheritance of their also large riches eg. by their children, if these rich people use these also large riches or it can reasonably be expected, that in the future they will use these also large riches to the action of charity (eg. charitable livelihood of a large amount of employees of these charitable rich people), this all is valid only under the condition, that these also large riches cause the least possible (it means apparently also not much more than the least possible) death and pain, otherwise according to this corrected communist idea it would be necessary to nationalize, virtually expropriate these large riches of these rich people by the State however only in charitable way, i.e. in compliance with causing the least possible death and pain even during this nationalization by the State.

 

So each existing on principle masculine ideology had to provide its followers above all with the necessary or more or better food, thus with cadavers of living creatures, because no imperfect living creature can eat only the words. If any people or other living creatures joined any in the history successful on principle masculine ideology in larger number, so they in fact expected above all to receive food, i.e. cadavers of living creatures from this ideology, and it was at the expense of other people or of other living creatures that therefore always considered any such new ideology as the at least greater risk of their own livelihood or even the great danger, that they themselves would be killed by the followers of this new ideology and eaten, therefore each new ideology meets with enormous skepticism of existing ideologies. On principle the necessity of leader of each successful ideology to provide for from beginning more and more increasing number of his or her or its followers with enough food, thus with enough cadavers of living creatures has meant up to now that each up to now existing ideology had sooner or later to tell big lies and to do big manipulations, therefore for example also Hindus publicly probably tell big lies about killing animals. Then Satan came and his people and his other living creatures and they tempted these leaders of this new ideology to even greater lies and to causing even more and more death and pain, which these new leaders have always sooner or later accepted under threat of losing food, thus on principle cadavers of living creatures for his or her or its followers in case the imperfection of his or her or its new ideology (according to me if it is not perfect God's, i.e. perfectly charitable ideology), then corresponding punishment by both Satan and the members of his hell for these caused much both death and pain followed, i.e. the people and other living creatures, that this new ideology caused much unnecessary death and pain, started to hate this new ideology and to fight against it, they started to uncover and publicize its big lies and this new ideology gradually started to lose and to acquire no additional new followers, therefore supply of the food, thus of cadavers of living creatures decreased, and when external and internal opposition and lack of food was indefensible by this new ideology, then its followers (according to my Rational Mystique people and other living creatures after death), that could already very hardly to change their ideology for their great faith and engaging in this new ideology, remained nothing other than to insist more or less on their big lies that hide the errors of their ideology in their causing much unnecessary death and pain, and either in the first case to cause still more and more death and pain (i.e. to cause even more hatred of living creatures against their group of followers, from which result according to the Philosophy of Balance in the future they can expect corresponding even greater punishment of Satan, virtually corresponding even great vendetta of living creatures, that they have caused great unnecessary death and pain), from which result the followers of this new ideology often cease to strive for true knowledge in a large conflict against their conscience, but they will start to fight in a big fear for mere reduction of their suffering in Satan's hell, or in the second case to do their repentance, eg. to beg and to seek to correct their ways.

 

In relation to the above mentioned I quote from Islam: One day Abu Bakr entered the schoolhouse of the Jews and found many of them assembled around a man whose name was Finhas. He was a doctor and rabbi, and had with him another rabbi called Ashya. Abu Bakr said to Finhas, 'Woe betide thee. Fear Allah, and make profession of Islam!' Finhas replied, "We have no need of Allah, but He has need of us! We do not beseech Him as He beseeches us. We are independent of Him, but He is not independent of us. If He were independent of us, He would not ask for our money as your master Muhammad does [for a war against Mecca ]. He forbids usury to you, but pays us interest; if He were independent of us He would give us no interest.' At this, Abu Bakr became angry, and struck Finhas violently, saying, 'I swear by Him in whose hands my life rests that if there were no treaty between us I would have struck off your head, you enemy of Allah!' Then Finhas went to the apostle of Allah and said, 'See what your companion has done to me! Abu Bakr explained what happened, but Finhas denied the whole matter and said, 'I spoke no such words!' But Allah revealed a verse conrirming the words of Abu Bakr. MUHAMMAD ŽIVOT ALLÁHOVA PROROKA, IBN ISHÁK, original in Arabic language: Sírat rasúl Alláh, from the English edition by Michael Edwardes, Ibn Ishaq, The Life Of Muhammad, Apostle Of Allah, published by Royal Asiatic Society of London in 1898, translated by Viktor Svoboda, in 2009 published by publishing house LEDA spol. s r.o. and by publishing house Rozmluvy, first edition. See https://archive.org/stream/Sirat-lifeOfMuhammadBy-ibnIshaq/SiratIbnIahaqInEnglish_djvu.txt , p. 54

 

In relation to the above mentioned I quote from Bible, according to which the Old Testament only one God Yahweh should personally kill many people (see eg. Exodus 12, 29 And it came to pass, that at midnight the Lord smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle. See http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Exod&no=12 and https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+12&version=KJV ) or according to which the Old Testament only one God Yahweh should personally kill also many from God dissenting Israelis (see eg. Numbers 16, 16 And Moses said unto Korah, Be thou and all thy company before the Lord, thou, and they, and Aaron, to morrow: 17 And take every man his censer, and put incense in them, and bring ye before the Lord every man his censer, two hundred and fifty censers; thou also, and Aaron, each of you his censer. 18 And they took every man his censer, and put fire in them, and laid incense thereon, and stood in the door of the tabernacle of the congregation with Moses and Aaron. …  35 And there came out a fire from the Lord, and consumed the two hundred and fifty men that offered incense. See http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Num&no=16 and https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers+16&version=KJV ) or according to which according to the command of both the Old Testament only one God Yahweh and Moses probably around 1500-1300 BC (i.e. before Christ) during the conquest of Canaan, i.e. of contemporary both Palestine and Israel the commander of the Israeli nation Joshua and his Israeli army should kill all at that time Canaan inhabitants, i.e. men, women and also children as cursed with the exception of a little individuals (see eg. Leviticus 27, 28 Notwithstanding no devoted thing, that a man shall devote unto the Lord of all that he hath, both of man and beast, and of the field of his possession, shall be sold or redeemed: every devoted thing is most holy unto the Lord. See http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Lev&no=27 and https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=leviticus+27&version=KJV . Deuteronomy 2, 34 And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain: See http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Deut&no=2 and https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+2&version=KJV . Joshua 10, 40 So Joshua smote all the country of the hills, and of the south, and of the vale, and of the springs, and all their kings: he left none remaining, but utterly destroyed all that breathed, as the Lord God of Israel commanded. See http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Josh&no=10 and https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=joshua+10&version=KJV . Joshua 11, 12 And all the cities of those kings, and all the kings of them, did Joshua take, and smote them with the edge of the sword, and he utterly destroyed them, as Moses the servant of the Lord commanded. See http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Josh&no=11 and https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=joshua+11&version=KJV .), similarly in other places of Bible in Old Testament (see eg.: Numbers 21, 3, Deuteronomy 3, 6, Deuteronomy 7, 2, Deuteronomy 13, 16, Deuteronomy 20, 17, Joshua 2, 10, Joshua 6, 17, Joshua 6, 18, Joshua 6, 21, Joshua 10, 28, Joshua 10, 35, Joshua 10, 37, Joshua 10, 39, Joshua 11, 11, Joshua 11, 20, Joshua 11, 21. See http://www.biblenet.cz/ and https://www.biblegateway.com/ .), or the sacrifices of a huge number of the animals according to the Bible Old Testament also ordered by the Old Testament only one God Yahweh for Israelites, which caused possibly no less death and pain than the above mentioned death of a huge number of people.

 

The above mentioned implies that on principle even contemporary Jews cannot believe anyway, that the Old Testament only one God, Yahweh is a charity, thus, that this Old Testament only one God is identical with Jesus' New Testament only one God who should be the charity according the above mentioned, which is reflected in historical and also in contemporary prevailing ideology of the world substantially controlled by Jews. On the basis of my up to now existing life experience I think that this Old Testament only one God could be Satan from the above mentioned book of Job (see above), i.e. Satan as both the tempter and executioner of all living creatures also of Jews (i.e. also in relation to Jews telling both partly truth and partly lies) and in all these completely subordinate, obeying and serving the Old Testament and the New Testament only one God, who is love, i.e. in the Latin translation of the Bible from St. Jerome's Vulgate “caritas”, i.e. in English language the charity (1 John 4, 16 And we have known and believed the love that God hath to us. God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him. In Latin Vulgate of St. Jerome Epistola B. Joannis Apostoli Prima 4, 16 et nos cognovimus et credidimus caritati quam habet Deus in nobis Deus caritas est et qui manet in caritate in Deo manet et Deus in eo). According to Rational Mystique of my Philosophy of Balance the Biblical leader of Israelis Moses apparently from the period around 1500-1300 BC, who personally killed the member of Egyptian nation (see Bible Old Testament, Exodus 2, 11 et seq.), other Biblical leader of Israelis king David from the period around 1000 BC, personally killed the member of Philistine nation Goliath (see Bible Old Testament, 1 Samuel 17, 48 et seq.), or Roman emperor Nero, who personally killed his pregnant wife Poppaea Sabina etc. (according to Rational Mystique and also all people after the death belonging to Satan, apparently with the exception of Jesus of Nazareth, apparently Christ) could be the above mentioned people, who before their death succumbed to the temptation by both Satan and his living creatures and who tried unsuccessfully to kill Satan and to replace him as the embodiment of death, i.e. the angel of death of other living creatures and then they had to subordinate very much to power of Satan. Flavius Josephus, the Jew with Hebrew name Joseph ben Mattityahu etc. could be a historical embodiment of the most possible perfect vacuum, i.e. of the most possible perfect nothing in our Universe, virtually embodiment of all death of all living creatures in our Universe, virtually Satan, i.e. the angel of death. Jesus of Nazareth, apparently both Godman and Christ apparently as the only one did not succumb before his death to the temptation by both Satan and his living creatures and he did not try to kill Satan at a critical moment (see Bible New Testament, Mathew 26, 51. 51 And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest's, and smote off his ear. 52 Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. 53 Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? 54 But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be? 55 In that same hour said Jesus to the multitudes, Are ye come out as against a thief with swords and staves for to take me? I sat daily with you teaching in the temple, and ye laid no hold on me. 56 But all this was done, that the scriptures of the prophets might be fulfilled. Then all the disciples forsook him, and fled. 57 And they that had laid hold on Jesus led him away to Caiaphas the high priest, where the scribes and the elders were assembled.).

 

All above mentioned quotations in English language from Bible, King James Version (KJV) see https://www.biblegateway.com/ .

 

25) 19/06/2016 About the basic metaphysical question, if it is possible to kill Satan, i.e. the Devil, i.e. death, and further about expropriation without compensation, i.e. communism and about the modern State of Israel and about Muslim Palestinians and further about the most popular contemporary Czech politicians Milos Zeman, Andrej Babiš and Karel Schwarzenberg, and about the expelled Czech Sudeten Germans and about the by possibly Jewish Andrej Babiš dominated Czech political Green Party and about the Austrian presidential elections in 2016.

 

The answer to the above mentioned basic metaphysical question in terms of my Philosophy of Balance in terms of its apparently only one self-evident dogma (see PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE, PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY: „All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." All the rest consists more in views (speculations).) is, that we quite surely can bring Satan under our control or we quite surely can defeat him, if however living creatures can kill Satan or if finally the only one God kills Satan, my Philosophy of Balance does not solve definitively, in other words above mentioned: "the least possible death and pain" from its above mentioned apparently only one self-evident dogma can mean both a minimum but still some existing death and pain, i.e. the permanent survival and necessity of Satan, to which at present time I personally tend based on my up to now personal experience, and also no both death and pain, i.e. it can mean also the permanent death of Satan.

 

How do various world religions solve this question, we can know in practice from the fact of an extension of communist reign in States, in which these religions prevail. In Christianity both solutions are apparently possible (see Biblical New Testament, Luke 8 King James Version (KJV) 18 Take heed therefore how ye hear: for whosoever hath, to him shall be given; and whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken even that which he seemeth to have." or vice versa Biblical New Testament, 1 John 4, "8 He that loveth not, knoweth not God, for God is love." or Biblical New Testament translation of St. Jerome (ie. the Vulgate) into Latin language from 4th to 5th century Joannis I "4: 8 qui non diligit non novit Deum Quoniam Deus caritas est "), but I believe as both a Christian and a Roman Catholic, that at present time in Christianity, especially in western Christianity prevails the view, that only one God defined by the Biblical New Testament as love or charity will not finally kill Satan, however in recent time the exception of apparently in the West prevailing opinion about not-killing Satan was the period of Hitler's German Nazi Reich, because its leader Adolf Hitler obviously considered and identified the Jews as such incarnation of Satan, virtually.of Devil, virtually of all evil in the world and also especially the Soviet, virtually.Russian and Jewish communists. However opinion about the necessity to kill Satan also apparently prevails in the minor eastern Orthodox Christianity, of which the largest Patriarchate is the Russian Patriarchate, to which two-thirds of Orthodox Christians are subordinated, because in Russia, virtually in the former Soviet Union the communism was born and ruled long time, of which ideology is based on expropriation by the State without compensation. In Islam the opinion about the impossibility to kill completely Satan, i.e. all the death and pain apparently prevails, because the expropriation without compensation could be viewed as a certain kind of theft or robbery from the viewpoint of Islam and because every Muslim is bound by strict prohibition of the Koran on theft, virtually on killing of another Muslim, the exceptions are apostates or heretics (eg. the Shiites can apparently kill, virtually rob, virtually steal from Sunnis and vice versa), however it is permitted or even commanded for every Muslim in need to steal from unbelievers, which Prophet Muhammad did also, when after his fleeing from Mecca to Medina he commanded his followers to steal, virtually to rob also the at that time most common trade caravans of Mecca inhabitants, i.e. of his relatives, during these robberies Muhammad permitted his followers and they had also to kill these inhabitants of Mecca, thus often their relatives (see chapter 12 -First Caravan When Allah made plunder permissible He allowed four parts to those who had won it, and one part to Himself and to His apostle, exactly as Abdullah had done with the captured caravan. This was the occasion when the first booty was taken by the Muslims, when the first prisoners were taken by the Muslims and when the first man was slain by the Muslims. It was eighteen months since the Emigrants had arrived in Medina.see p. 61, MUHAMMAD ŽIVOT ALLÁHOVA PROROKA, IBN ISHÁK, original in Arabic language: Sírat rasúl Alláh, from the English edition by Michael Edwardes, Ibn Ishaq, The Life Of Muhammad, Apostle Of Allah, published by Royal Asiatic Society of London in 1898, translated by Viktor Svoboda, in 2009 published by publishing house LEDA spol. s r.o. and by publishing house Rozmluvy, first edition. See https://archive.org/stream/Sirat-lifeOfMuhammadBy-ibnIshaq/SiratIbnIahaqInEnglish_djvu.txt ), the communism did not dominate the majority of Islamic and also Arabic States, apparently with the exception of Libya, Iraq and turkic-tatar (i.e. former territories controlled by Genghis Khan's, with the Mongolian father name Temüjin's Caucasian Golden horde) former Soviet Union republics (eg. Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Chechnya, etc.). In Judaism the opinion about the impossibility to kill Satan, i.e. all the death and pain apparently prevails, because the prevailing Old Testament Biblical ideal world is the Biblical paradise which the only one God did not create apparently perfectly good, but apparently only very good, but, because the biblical only one God should be perfect and thus He should create nothing imperfectly good, therefore the very good should be apparently the perfect good at the same time (see Bible, Genesis 1, 31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.), in the biblical paradise there were good and evil perfectly united in a single tree of knowledge of good and evil in the Garden of Eden (see Bible, Genesis 2, 16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: 17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.), on one side this tree of knowledge of good and evil had probably the most attractive fruits (see Bible, Genesis 3, 6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.), but on the other side the Biblical only one God forbade the first humans Adam and Eve to eat from this tree under the punishment of death, when both Adam and Eve violated this ban, they were not punished according to the Bible by this God by imminent death, but they were expelled from paradise by this God (see Bible, Genesis 3, 22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever: 23 Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. 24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.) and both Adam and apparently also Eve died later of the their old age (see Bible, Genesis 5, 4 And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters: 5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.) (all these quotations from the Bible see https://www.biblegateway.com/ ), the majority of Jews did not accept communism, although its authors were Jews Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels and Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov dominated tsarist Russia through communism, who adopted the nickname Lenin, and Lenin was apparently also after his maternal grandfather partially of Jewish origin (see http://relax.lidovky.cz/vudce-revoluce-lenin-byl-zid-dokazuje-dopis-jeho-sestry-pjh-/zajimavosti.aspx?c=A110524_093101_ln-zajimavosti_pks ), at present time the largest Jewish community in the world lives apparently in the United States of America (USA), at present time the third largest Jewish community in the world apparently lives in modern State of Israel, the communism never dominated these States, in the past the second largest Jewish community in the world lived in Russia, virtually in the former Soviet Union, which communism dominated at that time, at present time after the Second World War the large numbers of Jews from the former Soviet Union immigrated to modern State of Israel. In Buddhism the opinion about the possibility to kill completely Satan, i.e. all the death and pain apparently prevails (see Buddhist teaching of the final vanishing of all living creatures into nothingness, i.e. nirvana, which means literally "the state of the flame, which died", see p. 48, STORIG, H.J.: Malé dějiny filosofie / Little history of philosophy. Prague, publishing house Zvon, 1991), the world's largest Buddhist States such as China and Mongolia were dominated in the past or are dominated up to now by the communist ideology. Regarding Hinduism, so in Hinduism the opinion about impossibility of final killing of Satan apparently prevails, because on one side the death and pain of every living creature is the result of a past death and pain caused and apparently according to Hinduism also culpably caused by this living creature and by his or her or its ancestors (see so called “bad karma”), but on the other side after death the individual existence of saved human " disappears in the great soul of the world" (see p. 39, STORIG, H.J.: Malé dějiny filosofie / Little history of philosophy. Prague, publishing house Zvon, 1991), it is dissolved in Brahman, which is however apparently according to Hinduism regarding all living creatures the task, that can be accomplished apparently only in infinite time, the communism has also never dominated India.

 

26) 30/06/2016 (Mathematical definition of the Biblical God) 

 

(Addressing by the name),

I apologize for the by me yesterday in pub rather imprecisely put oral question to your husband Mr. (name), now I specify it in writing, which is necessary due to the complexity of this question, as you even yourself will surely recognize, i.e. as Czech proverbs say "What is written, it is given. " or another Czech prowerb  "Speech is talked, and the water flows.", if he wants to express something mathematically, it is necessary to express mathematically as it follows below:


At present time I am a Roman Catholic Christian, according to me from the point of view of Christianity about the only one Biblical God, i.e. the Lord (i.e. of both the Old Testament and the New Testament in the sense of the Bible Old and New Testaments | including deuterocanonic books |, Czech Ecumenical Translation, CZECH Bible Society, 1995, see
www.biblenet.cz , in English from King James Version http://www.biblegateway.com/ ) it is valid the following definitions, however it needs not to be an exhaustive definition:

The only one God, i.e. the Lord is love in the sense of caritas, the word caritas is of the Latin origin and into the English language it is most frequently translated by the word charity.

Detailed note: Idolatry, i.e. why only one God, i.e. the Lord is the love in the sense of caritas, not only love. How can Satan make from only one God a mere idol or image or object and to subordinate it and to misuse it to great evil action, thus according to the Philosophy of Balance to cause much more than the least possible death and pain. Examples include Nazis. The German Wehrmacht had in outfit of their soldiers on the belt the motto "Gott mit uns", that is translated into English "God with us", they could write as well there "Jesus of Nazareth with us," as it campaigned for example Medieval Catholic Crusaders or medieval Roman Catholic Inquisition. According to the Bible's New Testament the only one God is identical to charity. Misuse in the same way of the word “charity” is apparently very difficult or at present even completely impossible, if for example above mentioned Nazi soldiers of Wehrmacht had on the belt the motto "charity with us," not "God with us", as well as Catholic crusaders or the Roman Catholic Inquisition, so they should have hardly beatable, if not at present unbeatable barriers to commit war crimes as such especially killing of defenseless women and children, as the above mentioned Wehrmacht soldiers during World war II, or in the Middle Ages both Catholic crusaders and the Roman Catholic inquisitors did it in a large amount. Although in the past the above mentioned misuse of the word “love” has already occurred, in Latin in ancient Rome there was originally used the word "amor" for the word “love”, then one of the many gods of Roman polytheism was called by the word "Amor" or by in English "love" by the ancient Romans, then this ancient Roman god of love Amor acquired rather the meaning as a sex god, who included and approved or recommended also various sexual deviations like pedophile or homosexual sex, which later in ancient Rome were numerous and socially recommended ways of sex. Therefore, when St. Jerome translated the Biblical New Testament (so called Vulgate) into Latin in the 4th-5th Century AD (anno Domini) the phrase from the Bible, New Testament, 1 John 4, "8 He that loveth not, knoweth not God, for God is love." in his Latin Vulgate Joannis I „4:8 qui non diligit non novit Deum quoniam Deus caritas est“, so he did not use in ancient Rome largely discredited Latin word "amor" for the word "love", but he created for this word “love”, which should be Biblical only one God (see above), in Latin entirely new word "caritas" in English "charity" (derived from the Latin "carum, caro", i.e. in English "dear"or "valuable", in French “cher”, in Italian “caro”). According to me with knowledge of this historical experience the above mentioned word love in the sense of "caritas" or "charity" is in practice inmisapplicable by Satan.

                 

Literature: http://janbarton.blog.idnes.cz/blog.aspx?c=441864 , http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=John1&no=4 , https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+John+4&version=GNV , http://vulsearch.sourceforge.net/html/1Jo.html , https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulgata , http://www.vira.cz/otazky/Caritas-vyznam-slova.html

 

According to my Philosphy of Balance means the love in the sense of caritas (however it needs not to be an exhaustive definition):

 

PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE

PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:

„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." All the rest consists more in views (speculations).

Thus my question in relation to only one God, i.e. the Lord in the sense of the Old Testament is precisely:


About the only one Old Testament God, i.e. the Lord  the Bible Old and New Testaments | including deuterocanonic books |, Czech Ecumenical Translation, CZECH Bible Society, 1995, see
www.biblenet.cz , in English from King James Version http://www.biblegateway.com/  says besides other things: I quote from this translation of the Bible, according to which  the Old Testament only one God, i.e. the Lord should personally kill many people (see eg. Exodus 12, 29 And it came to pass, that at midnight the Lord smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh that sat on his throne unto the firstborn of the captive that was in the dungeon; and all the firstborn of cattle. See http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Exod&no=12 and https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+12&version=KJV ) or according to which the Old Testament only one God, i.e. the Lord should personally kill also many from God dissenting Israelis (see eg. Numbers 16, 16 And Moses said unto Korah, Be thou and all thy company before the Lord, thou, and they, and Aaron, to morrow: 17 And take every man his censer, and put incense in them, and bring ye before the Lord every man his censer, two hundred and fifty censers; thou also, and Aaron, each of you his censer. 18 And they took every man his censer, and put fire in them, and laid incense thereon, and stood in the door of the tabernacle of the congregation with Moses and Aaron. …  35 And there came out a fire from the Lord, and consumed the two hundred and fifty men that offered incense. See http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Num&no=16 and https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers+16&version=KJV ) or according to which according to the command of both the Old Testament only one God, i.e. the Lord and Moses probably around 1500-1300 BC (i.e. before Christ) during the conquest of Canaan, i.e. of contemporary both Palestine and Israel the commander of the Israeli nation Joshua and his Israeli army should kill all at that time Canaan inhabitants, i.e. men, women and also children as cursed with the exception of a little individuals (see eg. Leviticus 27, 28 Notwithstanding no devoted thing, that a man shall devote unto the Lord of all that he hath, both of man and beast, and of the field of his possession, shall be sold or redeemed: every devoted thing is most holy unto the Lord. See http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Lev&no=27 and https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=leviticus+27&version=KJV . Deuteronomy 2, 34 And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain: See http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Deut&no=2 and https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+2&version=KJV . Joshua 10, 40 So Joshua smote all the country of the hills, and of the south, and of the vale, and of the springs, and all their kings: he left none remaining, but utterly destroyed all that breathed, as the Lord God of Israel commanded. See http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Josh&no=10 and https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=joshua+10&version=KJV . Joshua 11, 12 And all the cities of those kings, and all the kings of them, did Joshua take, and smote them with the edge of the sword, and he utterly destroyed them, as Moses the servant of the Lord commanded. See http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b?book=Josh&no=11 and https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=joshua+11&version=KJV .), similarly in other places of Bible in Old Testament in the above mentioned translation (see eg.: Numbers 21, 3, Deuteronomy 3, 6, Deuteronomy 7, 2, Deuteronomy 13, 16, Deuteronomy 20, 17, Joshua 2, 10,