Symbiotic agriculture
and experiments of natural science
proving Philosophy of Balance
„All
living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a
world, where everyone likes each other,
therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least
possible death and pain."
All
the rest consists more in
views (speculations).
(I.e.
the maximum compliance of good and evil individuals,
virtually the good and the evil)
In support of the political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures www.spvzt.cz .
My text on the www.spvzt.cz and on the mentioned webs is
licensed under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported, unless
stated specifically otherwise.
3rd edition, Copyleft
2013-2014
Content
1. Introduction … 3
2.3 Dairy cattle breeding
… 39
2.4 Breeding fleas
… 44
3. Plant production … 46
3.1 Cultivation of potatoes … 46
3.3 Beekeeping … 59
3.4 Most merciful methods of preserving plant fruits, especially in the Czech Republic … 61
(All quotations from the Bible in this book because of
copyright are on principle in Czech from Kralice Bible
see http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~rovnanim/bible/k/1K15.php : Bible of Kralice, Protestant Theological Faculty of Charles University, Prague
, originally all inspired by the Bible Old
and New Testaments | including deuterocanonic books
|, Czech ecumenical translation, CZECH Bible Society, 1995, see www.biblenet.cz
, in English from King James Version http://www.biblegateway.com/
)
I want to grow potatoes according to my Philosophy of
Balance, potatoes are next to the corn along with soy products the important plant component of my food in extreme emergency, it is not a plant fruit or plant seed, due to prioritization of national foods and farmers to non eco-friendly imported foods at a greater distance, but which can support on the other hand poor developing countries of producers of these foods, and they could become an important component of the
diet of my hens.
I want to educate pests of potatoes,
in particular Elytrigia and Colorado potato beetles
not to reproduce excessively, then they will also have the right according to
my Philosophy of Balance to a long, happy and dignified life and death with
almost no physical and mental pain. Therefore, I will intervene against them
according to the rules of the Philosophy of Balance only if they reproduce
excessively. If they do not reproduce excessively, then I will let them to eat
my potato plants which apparently will improve the quality of their existing
variety as regards their resistance against these pests. It will be a kind of
symbiosis between my plants, namely potatoes and their pests, in particular Elytrigia and Colorado potato beetles.
If I succeed in the education of pests of my plants of
potatoes not to reproduce excessively and to live in symbiosis with my plants
of potatoes, so it will be a proof that nature can be merciful, even at such a
primitive level, such as insects and plants that even at this level and in this
case of quite hostile species of living creatures it is possible and the best
solution for all concerned their symbiosis and that their Darwin’s fighting for
life and death is also in this case only the possible and at the same time the
worst solution.
The first scientific proof of my Philosophy of
Balance, or possibility of nature to be merciful as its best solution at the
level of animal production is, inter alia, the symbiosis of my dog, or
carnivore, of me or omnivore and of my hens or our exclusive animal prey, when
meat diet of my dog and of me as a person and probably even of my hens is
formed for several years exclusively by corpses of naturally dead hens, in
principle, of old age from my shelter for broilers (see my book Philosophy of Balance,
Book II Application of Philosophy of Balance in material world, 2nd Part the
Behavior according to Philosophy of Balance).
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 18/07/2013 13:10:42
Post:
Today I harvested my other
two plants of my potatoes from my above symbiotic way of agriculture, from both
planted potatoes I gained the harvest of 2551 grams of healthy large early
potatoes. I waited for a green herb of potato plant to become dry, so that the whole plant did not
die at harvest. The result of this experiment proves a real possibility
in the nature of possible maximal symbiosis (i.e. harmony or paradise) of my
entire food chain of me as a human, my dog, my hens (males and females), my
potatoes and their pests, especially Elytrigia
and Colorado potato beetles, hence of all living creatures.
(my) Photos: https://www.facebook.com/dalibor.gruza/media_set?set=a.10200289137693320.1073741827.1299966627&type=1
(see www.spvzt.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Conclusions
of my experiment:
1) The dog is a
carnivore and it cannot live on a vegetarian diet.
2) The dog should
get due to humanity superior vegetarian food (also the best are home eggs,
where they do not let the roosters to slaughter, and semi-hard or curd cheese
from microbial rennet best from the milk from organic farming, where they do
not let the males to slaughter) and food from naturally dead, not slaughtered,
eventually frozen animals.
3) The dog
should receive the least possible amount of food from naturally dead,
eventually frozen animals not to harm seriously its health. In my breeding
experiment it means not least than
4) Body of
naturally dead, eventually frozen animal as dog food should be boiled in
several waters, to avoid serious diseases affecting dog and a human life.
5) The best is
that the keeper of the dog keeps also other animals such as chickens for home
eggs and further those he or she gives to carnivores after their natural death,
when he or she has complete confidence, that they are not slaughtered, and
after medical autopsy.
6) Similar
rules should be determined experimentally because of humanity (the biblical
paradise on Earth) for the other carnivores.
7) Carnivores, such as some snakes that cannot
eat carrions, the human before death cannot breed at home, other people can
breed them at home apparently, or the God can breed them outside in nature.
Cadavers dying naturally, principally of the old age, from home poultry
farms for diet of the dogs or cats, possibly human
This food mercy (i.e.
symbiosis) may be based on the breeding of broiler chickens to their natural
death of old age, virtually their most common heart attack, which occurs when
the outdoor breeding in a chicken coop in their age on average 2-3 years,
whereas, broiler chickens are hard race and broilers are originally bred to
life with a length of approximately 30 days until their slaughter for meat. We
feed broilers grain grown without herbicides and pesticides, as well as dried
organic alfalfa, which naturally includes dried insects and fresh grass. After
the broiler has died, it is necessary to perform its autopsy by veterinarian,
in order to determine whether it did not die of some contagious illness,
especially of a bacterial or viral infection. Then it is necessary to freeze a
broiler and to calculate the minimum quantity of this carrion of an animal that
will be necessary for the healthy nutrition of a particular dog or cat. This is
done in such a way that we feed dog or cat with diet free from the corpses of
animals i.e. the eggs and milk, both are the best from home breed, and in my
experience the best purely vegetarian organic feed is yarrah
for dog or purely vegetarian feed ami cat for cats (in
my experience a dog or cat will not survive only on a purely vegetarian feed ami cat or yarrah for dogs,
although the manufacturer states that it is a complete feed, during the
exclusive long-term use of the purely vegetarian feed ami
dog my dog vomited permanently the yellow water), that according to my
experience animals like to eat and we watch occurrence of the symptoms of
allergic reactions of the animals to this feed. Symptoms of an allergic
reaction to this feed are vomiting, diarrhea, or scratching of a dog or a cat,
after occurrence of allergic reaction of this dog or cat we feed immediately
200 grams of frozen carrion of an animal, which we will cut with a meat cleaver
from frozen carrion of the animal. Then again, all of the steps of above diet
of a dog or a cat without dead animals only with the aforementioned eggs and
milk and the feed yarrah for dog or ami cat for cat and when above mentioned allergic reactions
appear we determine the number of days the animal survives with 200 grams of a
carrion of an animal, and we calculate by dividing the 200 grams of carrion of
animal with this number of days a minimum quantity of a carrion of an animal
which we have to give a cat or dog for above mentioned feeding without the dead
animals that the cat or dog stays healthy. At the same time, even if we adhere
to this minimum amount of carrions of animals, so when the above allergic
reactions appear at a dog or a cat we must feed them additional large quantity
of this animal carrion not to endanger the dog or cat a life dangerous allergic
shock. The most dangerous threat of death of nutritional inadequacy, when the
above vegetarian feed of a dog or a cat, basically, if we do not apply
correctly the above steps, is physical-motor problems of a dog or a cat, at
their occurrence a vet has to always be found immediately, who typically
applies to an animal injected vitamins from corpses of animals and the standard
diet should be recovered for a period of convalescence of the animal (i.e. meat
canned) of a dog or a cat. Perhaps for animals it is
unnecessary, but for humans necessary to boil the carrions of animals in
several waters. To the human with the allergy with long-term ovo-lacto vegetarian diet for details see http://www.spvzt.cz/SPVZTbooklet.html#7 .
The above steps of merciful
feeding I apply with the success for myself and also already 4 years for my dog
(up to 07/2013 purely vegetarian feed ami dog), that
in 2013 reaches the age of 7 years, which needs in the aforementioned
vegetarian lacto-ovo feeding method according to the
above calculation, when its weight approximately 10 kg, at least 10 grams of a
carrion of an animal per day (that is, when for example I will give it 120
grams of animal carrion, it lasts for a maximum of 12 days) and which I
regularly do a complete blood analysis at the vet also, according to the latest
complete blood analysis of my dog at the vet from 20.2.2013 my
dog is in this diet completely healthy (that is, it has all the blood values
OK).
Literature: http://www.amipetfood.com/ : Ami Pet food, Italy)
, http://www.spvzt.cz/ , http://www.spvzt.sweb.cz/ , http://www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ , http://www.yarrah-bio.cz/content/1-psi : Organic Vega dry dog food, Yarrah Organic Petfood B.V., the Netherlands
Theme author: Dalibor Grůza
Theme: The paradise begins with a scientific experiment in my garden
Time: 03/07/2010 17:59:59 corrected 18/07/2010
Post:
I decided to adopt to my family
a hen and a rooster which risk the death for their aggression on farms, just as
I took to the family from the animal shelter my kind but perhaps coward dog Bad
(comes from English word bad or spoken English buddy friend) to follow a
scientific experiment, when I will feed them only plant foods, eggs and
milk, except what they can get from someone else or find in the nature, by which
I, hopefully with all of you, save the world and begin achieving a paradise for
all of us:
According to the Philosophy of Balance there are three solutions :
1 ) My dog Bad and all hens will die and then I myself apparently from
malnutrition and lack of appropriate nutrients, which according to the
Philosophy of Balance could mean either a majority of vacuum or waving at the
speed of light in the Universe .
With high probability I can exclude this possibility on the basis of a
scientific experiment, that I conducted on myself by shifting to diet based
fundamentally on plant seeds, plant fruits, milk (biomilk
in case of bone pain, especially the feet pain - about
Literature: http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega-3_nenasyc3 %
A9_mastn % C3 % A9_kyseliny, http://www.knivic.unas.cz/omegapodrobne.htm : Esenciální mastné kyseliny
2) Bad - my dog will not survive
without meat, even though we will receive eggs of both hens, milk and plant
foods, and I will have to kill one or both chickens by hypnotizing it, rotating
it and then chop off its head cutting through its cervical. It will bleed to
death, which would mean a painless death for the chicken with the least
possible anxiety prior to its death because it will sleep deeply and due to the
shock of cutting the carotid artery it will not feel pain in the sleep before
its brain dies out through exsanguinations (except hypnosis see the Torah or
Old Testament thus five books of Moses).
Above mentioned could according to the Philosophy of Balance mean the evenness
of the vacuum and waving at the light speed in the Universe.
3) Survival of Bad-my dog as well as of both hens on only acceptable
vegetable diet, eggs and milk and on what they find without my knowledge (hens
in the garden, Bad on walks).
This idea, according to the Philosophy of Balance, could mean balance of nonabsolute vacuum and waving at speed of light in the
Universe and the possibility of objects movement on the speed of light on a
non-zero resting mass –Christ (according to the Special Theory of Relativity
about infinite energy) and absolute vacuum beyond our Universe limits
represented by this absolute vacuum - Devil and waving at the speed of light -
Christ in our Universe, thus God who reduces from theological reasons of
rectification of sinners in the world the current entropy – burn out – the homogenity of the Universe by returning its previous state
of the vacuum and the waving at speed of light in our Universe (here comes the
final reconciliation of the Devil and Christ in the infinite time).
Note: Projection of the garden space for one or two chickens is about 4x6m (
Questions, that I would like to answer:
- How big do you think is suitable space for two or one hen?
- Should I get a rooster or a hen first, or just a rooster or just a hen only
(probably I will get attacking individuals from big scale farming, who would
otherwise have to be killed)
- What are going to be the symptoms of irreversible death threat at chickens
and Bad according to your opinion?
(The Philosophy of Balance, see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 4, 2010 5:11:27
Message :
quote :
Post of neronis
I will have to kill one or both chickens by
hypnotizing it, rotating it and then chop off its head cutting through its cervical.
It will bleed to death, which would mean a painless death for the chicken with
the least possible anxiety prior to their death because they sleep deeply and
due to the shock of cutting the carotid artery it will not feel pain in the
sleep before its brain dies out through exsanguinations
It would be possible to do so, if you put a bag on its
head, the one which is impenetrable to light. The hen sees only black and could
asleep then. How do you want to rotate it, in the air by its feet?
Otherwise serve to Bad only eggs and vegetable diet. Put him in a week or two
into the yard, where the chickens are and observe if he wants to eat them. So
maybe this should tell you if your meal satisfies him. Although it probably
depends on what breed Bad is.
Neronisi,
Bad is the size of fox terriers (medium breed) of indeterminate breed, red,
clear brown eyes. Probably a mixture of several breeds (mut dog).
Dalibor
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 4, 2010 5:30:52
Message :
I kept thinking it might be the
old chicken or chickens intended for the slaughter.
My aunt, my stepmother recommends two hens, because they will live happier. If
it was a rooster and a hen, the rooster would keep on inseminating the hen, as
one rooster has to be for two hens, and then she would die.
Also, we talked with my aunt that a weasel could slip through the holes in the
fence into the garden and kill the hen (I think mostly it as a hen and a
rooster as a species, unless the meaning of the text is different and I mean
just the hen a female and not a rooster) or somebody could steal them
(e.g., local Gypsies). According to the Philosophy of Balance it is better when
a hungry mammal eats one or more hens prior its death, because a mammal is
evolutionally better animal than a bird. It has more developed nervous system
and feels more pain during slaughter.
Questions, that I would like to answer:
- What is your view of the above mentioned?
- What is your opinion on the above scientific experiment?
Literature: Evolution Theory – science or religion?, Ing. Josef Potoček, GRANO SALIS
NETWORK, 2004, http://granosalis.cz/ebooks/evolucniteorie.htm
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 4, 2010 5:46:44
Message :
Information about the death by
cutting the carotid artery, except hypnosis, comes from the Old Testament, the
Torah, the Five Books of Moses conveyed to me through the book of convert to
Judaism (which became a Jew) Benjamin Kuras,
Forbidden fruit of knowledge, the Bible as a drama and therapy, G plus G
ltd., Prague 2003, p. 190 et seq and p. 216 et seq.
(see option number 2) in my initial post in this topic)
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 4, 2010 4:21:30 p.m.
Message :
Miroslav, Neronisi,
To achieve a successful attempt I should feed the predators mainly with egg
yolk and herbivores predominantly with egg whites in addition to herbal
supplements, in principle they would not be fed with the whole egg.
Note: Taurine apparently extracted from egg yolk
probably of luteinat especially for predators,
like cats, and glycine extracted from egg white
probably of albuminat produced by the liver,
especially for herbivorous animals, chickens, and partridges against intoxication
with copper.
Literature: Harperova Biochemistry, Robert K.Murray, Daryl K. Granner, Peter
A. Mayes, Victor W. Rodwell, twenty-third
edition, the fourth Czech edition, the H + H third, 2002, published by
publishing house H + H , Vyšehradská Ltd. , Page 706
of the Czech edition third in H + H http://www.veterinarnipece.cz/royal-canin-vd-canine-feline-instant-convalescence-support-2035.html : Penecos-N spol. s r.o., shop Pilsen and veterinary surgery , http://www.slouceniny.unas.cz/bilkoviny.htm , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serin , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycin , http://www.super.cz/clanek/40363-za-touhu-po-cokolade-mohou-bakterie-ve-strevech.html
( see also www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 4, 2010 4:40:57 p.m.
Message :
Neronisi, Miloslav ,
Father Josef Grůza recommended me to keep a kind of vlaška (i.e. Italian breed of fowl) partridge hen two or
three, or at worst from them cultivated leghornky
hens.
Questions :
What do you think?
Author: neronis
Time: July 4, 2010 4:58:25 p.m.
Message :
Well I'm not, that well
acquainted in the matter to give you absolution. For me is a hen like a hen.
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 4, 2010 6:14:54 p.m.
Message :
Neronisi,
Lidka Horakova from Hustopeče, a breeder of hens and a librarian advised me
that to get two eggs per two days I have to have three hens, because they will
not lay the eggs at the same time.
(See www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 5, 2010 8:54:35
Message :
Father Josef Grůza recommended me keeping hens just before egg yield,
not chickens before slaughter. Those are bred for life with a length of about
50 days and then due to received hormones suffer deadly diseases.
(See www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Miloslav Bažant
Time: July 5, 2010 12:16:51
Message :
Dalibor.
My view is close to a view of your father, just to clarify a little. It is
essential to buy chickens. It is cheaper than the older hens before first egg
yield. Also the good thing is to look at surrounded hen keepers, even through
the fence. Their choice of species is influenced by the experience and so they
keep kinds suitable for a particular site. My mother advised me this trick and
I later found out, that it actually works. And so in some areas can be found at
backyards rather vlašky hens and elsewhere white
hens. You can make an attempt, where is the superiority of the white hens start
the vlašky hen breeding, but it is possible they do
not get along well.
I do not speak about the experiment, but rather about a domestic source of
eggs, which are much healthier than those from manufacturing production kicked
up by powders and chemicals.
By the way, hen is not a
herbivore, but omnivore, even a focused cannibalist.
If you feed hens with intestines of their mates, they will have a fight about
them. If you would ask why it is a domestic rake fowl, then you get a reply
that through scratching they are looking for different insects, larvas and worms. Relative to them the hen is a predator.
In your experiment a hen is not a representative of light and goodness but the
predator and prey just like the hen and the dog. If you would feed the hens
only with grain they will suffer and soon will faint, you'd have to provide a
source of calcium or you get false eggs without the shell or there would burst
cannibalism among them. If they are in the yard or garden, then they will found
some animal protein food themselves. If you want to perform the experiment in
which you need contradictions, it would have to be next to the dog definite
herbivores, like cows. Such an attempt even as being absurd should also
achieved positive results, the dog should watch the house, hen
will give the homemade, healthy eggs and cow milk, however this is conditional
on pregnancy, so you'd have to see a bull sometimes, but in turn you would
increase your attempt for a calf. Therefore you would change too because you
would have to become a farmer and you might be cured with schizophrenia and
making nonsensical theories. That is why I do not intend to prevent you in this
attempt or condemn it.
MB
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 6, 2010 4:57:06 p.m.
Message :
…
Miloslav ,
by Friday, July 9, 2010 I have to take three broilers – cultivated chicken of
hens bred for slaughter, otherwise they will get killed. So I have to fix a
chicken farm and fence my so far not fenced garden from two sides.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 9, 2010 8:55:35 p.m.
Message :
Dear
all,
Today I brought 30 chicken- medium, fattened broiler chickens and I am still
waiting for an additional 20 medium-sized fattened chickens broilers, who were
supposed to be slaughtered, so I probably saved them from a certain death (see
my attempt at an ad 3) first post in this topic).
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 11, 2010 8:03:03
Message :
…
Dear all,
Today I went to have a look at my hen raising and one of hens, despite of
all my efforts (yesterday I was there about three times, twice by car) died
(it did not move, laid without a soul, even when I carried it in the plastic
bag from the basement. Even though I did not intoxicate it,
for example by hypnotic. It was not my intention or event of my
ignorance (my father told me in the late afternoon to turn them the light on,
because they are used to it from previous breeding, to eat and drink when the
light is on and sleep when it is dark. Later my neighbor also advised me I have
to close the door to the underground cellar and turn the light off there,
probably because of rats and other rodents. The light was on only in the
aboveground part of the basement, called the pressroom, in the two rooms with
the hole in the door as an escape to the garden. One of the chickens was
apparently too weak and I had failed to provide it an adequate care).
Everything bad is good for something. I cut the piece of the neck to my dog
Bad and he ate it tastefully. Before, that I cut chicken’s carotid artery to
find out whether the blood is leaking, which was not the case. After my dog
Bad, which was closed at home, ate a piece of chicken neck, there remained on
the bottom of the bowl a little bit of blood. Still in the cellar I washed the
dead chicken in cold water and at home I put it in plastic bag in the freezer.
From this I conclude that even I, who does not eat perfectly fruitarian
(i.e. only plant seeds and fruits of the plant but also a little something not
fruitarian) as in paradise, must eventually die naturally as the chicken - hen-
broiler. Then I wish I was eaten up by those who need it to survive, like my
dog ate a piece of a hen - naturally dead chicken.
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Milan.Miló
Time: July 11, 2010 8:30:37
Message :
Dalibor .
From your contribution it is clearly visible, that you finally
start to awaken a little bit in the sense, that you finally realize
continuity and following context of causing effects.
In the sense that animals like your dog Bad
is after all a dog and he needs for his life
balanced diet of plants, it is fruit and vegetables
and mainly meat-based diet because the dog does not eat
for example nuts or honey, that for humans
replace what is missing when people do not eat meat.
And it is protein and polypeptides.
You can find them mostly in meat.
Everybody can see you are finally beginning to realize
that as the chicken died from your lack of knowledge
it could be Bad, your dog who could die,
who I believe you love.
I hope you are not serious about eating yourself,
As, though in this company are people with these dispositions.
It is unbearably unacceptable.
As the history progressed forward
and now mainly we do not live in the Middle Ages or
during the prenatal
period of civilization.
And I think, that you do not even want the animals to
do the think you wrote about eating yourself.
Milan.Miló
.
Author: Milan.Miló
Time: July 11, 2010 8:44:44
Message :
Dalibor .
I know you could argue why for example animals could not
eat you, when in Buddhism it is obvious example.
As if someone died before 1959,
before
that even today it works in minor.
So when a man died in
Buddhist monks did as follows.
They took the remains to the
the human body, literally and with the bones grinded down to a paste
So the wild birds such as vultures could eat it up.
So that his body was freed from the negation of this life
and his soul came to deliverance
to prevent a recurrence of the return to this world.
In Buddhism it is believed in the Bardo death.
It is 49-day cycle when the human desire to return
to this world.
But it is another culture with other elements based on religion.
Resources- for example
Milan.Miló
.
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 11, 2010 11:20:18
Message :
quote :
Post of Miloslav Bažant
Dalibor .
To buy broilers bred for slaughter is the first stupid thing, because you
cannot get them granulated diet, on which they are accustomed and before they
get used to another food they peg out. Breeding in the basement? In fact I
prefer not to show my opinion here. It is a torture of animals. In the basement
you cannot ensure the conditions, which are necessary for survival, including
air-conditioning. You wrote about your garden. Just separate some part with a
shelter by a wire fence and they will be ok. You want them to live in paradise
and save them from death, but in reality you gave them a hell lot worse than
the death by slaughter. If you want your dog to eat the meat of dead chickens,
do not give him that raw, he will get used to it and he will start to hunt the
hens.
So how it is correct? Those broilers, already having their slaughter weight,
you have to kill, pluck, gut and store in the freezer. Otherwise you will
unnecessary feed them and they peg out anyway.
Separate some suitable part of the garden, build a chicken house,
or at least a shelter and buy chickens. You can get them much cheaper than the
fat broilers. After they grow up and get used to you, then they can have opened
fowl run. But sometimes you will have damaged lawn and sometimes you will step
into a shit. These hens will be in an environment that suits them, as in
paradise. If they can tear the grass, you will get nice eggs even with an
orange yolk. You will taste the difference at the first try. If they will start
yielding, serve them crushed eggshells to provide enough calcium. Otherwise you
can feed them grain and leftovers. Only it should not be too greasy. If you
want to know what the chickens really are, then throw those broilers the guts
of dead chicken. You'll see a battle. I hope, that you did not store the dead
hen in the freezer ungutted. First of all the fridge
is not enough you need a freezer and you cannot gut the frozen hen.
Furthermore, the intestines make faster decomposition. By now you better throw
the whole hen to Bad (boiled). The question is whether it did not die of some
infection or pip. It is such a pustule on its tongue. Chickens cannot eat and
die of hunger. If you want to have hens you have to know something about it.
The village people learn throughout all their lives and transmit information to
each other, but the city person has not, that information and makes those
creatures a living hell. If you have the cottage in the village, see a neighbor
and he/she will be pleased to pass you information.
MB
Miloslav,
Firstly I do not have them in the cellar that is my first basement level, but
in my press room, i.e., two rooms with a hole in the door as the fowl run to
the garden in my first floor. The piece of chicken neck I gave to my dog Bad unboiled, which was probably a
mistake and it will not happen anymore.
To storing hens: before I cut the chicken neck, I put it still in the press
room in the basement under the running cold water to wash it a bit because it
was contaminated by chicken excrements and even then it did not move and showed
no signs of life. After I washed it a little more at home, cut its throat and
put it into the freezer as it was. Then I went to Roman Catholic (Christian)
church for mass. When I returned, the chicken was already frozen. According to
my Philosophy of Balance, I must ensure to all living cells the longest
possible life even when frozen, that is, why I will not do anything else before
my dog’s Bad consumption. It will probably be like in a book of František Běhounek about the
North Pole, where contemporary polar explorers ate in a need a frozen
prehistoric mammoth. My stepmother, my aunt has confirmed me,
that the preserved meat is not good, but my dog Bad will be able to eat
it. When he does not like it, so it will be very good,
because it will be less long time before he becomes a vegetarian.
P.S. In the press room it is quite cold, there is a shade and an air draught,
there are always two barred windows, the internal door between the rooms and
press room are taken out of hinges and lay on the ground. Another air draught
makes a hole between the floor and the doorway area of 30x40 cm. It serves
hens, broiler chickens to be able to go to the garden, when they dare. The hole
in the door is fully firmly shut for the night and opened in the morning, and
so there is of course always at the door a small vent, through which probably
any animal can pass.
I have a garden surrounded by a fence and I myself fenced it by rabbit wire.
Also I put the posts to the door etc. to fill the holes under the fence and
gate.
I still listen to advises and review it according to the Philosophy of Balance.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 14, 2010 2:21:40 p.m.
Message :
quote :
Post of neronis
Dalibor, if you want a dog
to adapt to a vegetarian diet, you can achieve it after x generations, when its
DNA adapts. A female dog would help you to start the breeding, which you will
train as a vegan. While there will be too many of them, you will destroy a
couple of them, or can give it to someone. If Bad will get use to these
practices without a genetic continuity, not only it is impossible to manage it
during his life, but also after all you are going it extra unnecessarily.
http://www.novinky.cz/koktejl/205362-tibetanum-se-zmenilo-30-genu-potvrdili-biologove.html : 2010, Peking, Famous
Neronis, Miloslav,
I had a total of 50 hens, broiler chickens, 3 did not survived, I have 47pieces
left. According to the Philosophy of Balance I am obliged to deliver them
enough grain, not to eat too much worms, ants or insects. And became mainly
fruitarian (essentially eat only plant seeds and fruits of plants from all
living creatures), so I ordered
My dog Bad and I will have descendants at the old age, because in my Philosophy
of Balance comes improvement of individual and his/her genetic information
throughout a life. In the Bible, Abraham and Sarah had children as well as in
the old age. Maybe then will start a paradise.
Note:
According to the Bible Old and New Testaments | including deuterocanonic
books |, Old Testament, the Torah, 5 books of Moses, namely 1st Moses´ -
Genesis (in Hebrew Berešít) chapter 21, verse 1-3: 1 1 And the Lord visited Sarah as he had said, and the Lord
did unto Sarah as he had spoken. 2 For Sarah conceived, and bare Abraham a son
in his old age, at the set time of which God had spoken to him. 3 And Abraham
called the name of his son that was born unto him, whom Sarah bare to him,
Isaac.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 16, 2010 6:27:17 p.m. corrected on July 18, 2010
Message :
quote :
Post of (see http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1375 : Ráj začíná vědeckým pokusem na mé zahradě) and corrected by Dalibor Grůza
I decided to adopt to my family a hen and a rooster which risk the death for
their aggression on farms, just as I took to the family from the animal shelter
my kind but perhaps coward dog Bad (comes from English word bad or spoken
English buddy friend) to follow a scientific experiment, when I will feed
them only plant foods, eggs and milk , except what they can get from someone
else or find in the nature, by which I , hopefully with all of you , save
the world and begin achieving a paradise for all of us :
According to the Philosophy of Balance there are three solutions :
1 ) My dog Bad and all hens will die and then I myself apparently from
malnutrition and lack of appropriate nutrients, which according to the
Philosophy of Balance could mean either a majority of vacuum or waving with the
speed of light in the Universe .
With high probability I can exclude this possibility on the basis of a
scientific experiment, that I conducted on myself by shifting to diet based
fundamentally on plant seeds, plant fruits, milk (biomilk
in case of bone pain, especially the feet pain - about
Literature: http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega-3_nenasyc3 %
A9_mastn % C3 % A9_kyseliny, http://www.knivic.unas.cz/omegapodrobne.htm : Esenciální mastné kyseliny
2) Bad - my dog will not survive
without meat, even though we will receive eggs of both hens, milk and plant
foods, and I will have to kill one or both chickens by hypnotizing it, rotating
it and then chop off its head cutting through its cervical. It will bleed to
death, which would mean a painless death for the chicken with the least
possible anxiety prior to their death because they sleep deeply and due to the
shock of cutting the carotid artery it will not feel pain in the sleep before
its brain dies out through exsanguinations (except hypnosis see the Torah or
Old Testament thus five books of Moses).
Above mentioned could according the Philosophy of Balance mean the evenness of
the vacuum and waving at the light speed in the Universe.
3) Survival of the Bad-my dog as well as of both hens on only acceptable
vegetable diet, eggs and milk and on what they find without my knowledge (hens
in the garden, Bad on walks).
This idea, according to the Philosophy of Balance, could mean balance of nonabsolute vacuum and waving at speed of light in the
Universe and the possibility of objects movement on the speed of light on a
non-zero resting mass –Christ (according to the Special Theory of Relativity
about infinite energy) and absolute vacuum beyond our Universe limits
represented by this absolute vacuum - Devil and waving on the speed of light -
Christ in our Universe, thus God who reduces from theological reasons of
rectification of sinners in the world the current entropy – burn out – the
homogeneity of the Universe by returning its previous state of the vacuum and
the waving at speed of light in our Universe (here comes the final
reconciliation of the Devil and Christ in the infinite time).
Note: Projection of the garden space for one or two chickens is about 4x6m (
Questions, that I would like to answer:
- How big do you think is suitable space for two or one hen?
- Should I get a rooster or a hen first, or just a rooster or just a hen only
(probably I will get attacking individuals from big scale farming, who would
otherwise have to be killed)
- What are going to be the symptoms of irreversible death threat at chickens
and Bad according to your opinion?
(The Philosophy of Balance, see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Dear
all,
to summarize the partial results of the experiment in my garden, the
possibility number ad 2) of my initial post (see above) came to a fullfiment, because there were natural deaths of three of
my breeding hens and one hen was eaten by my dog Bad.
That would mean the temporary balance between good and evil, between the waving
at the speed of light and vacuum in our world. Not about a predominance of
waves at light speed - Christ or an absolute vacuum - Devil, which would save
out our world, see the possibility of ad 3). At the same time Bad - my dog, the
remaining chickens and I are doing quite well, which would exclude the
possibility number 1 see ad 1), which is a predominance of evil, the Devil - a nonabsolute vacuum or Christ –waving at the speed of light
in our Universe.
I'm not at the end with my attempt, but preliminarily we can say, that we
cannot rely in our world for cooperative intervention from outside, Christ –
waving at the speed of light and the Devil a nonabsolute
vacuum (see option ad 3) and it is necessary to at least come from assigned
Jewish philosophy, thus ensure for all close creatures - surrounded living
beings, especially animals as dignified, longest and happiest life as possible
and the most merciful death.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 19, 2010 9:49:32
Message :
quote :
Post of Miloslav Bažant
Milan Millo,
Yes, I was kidding, but I tried to be funny and not to offend anybody. And so I
was actually mostly making fun of myself. What effects it will have on Dalibor I really do not know, but I think none at all,
because he does not accept anything what is somehow against his theories and is
unaware of my words, which were intended rather to the other people, not to
ridicule but more for a smile. Should I seriously analyze mistakes he made? If
in the attempt should be on one side a predator and herbivore on the other,
then a dog is a representant of predators, but a hen
is not a clear vegetarian, but rather omnivorous and when one considers, that
hens like to eat living creatures, such as caterpillars, larvas
and worms, they stand for a predator either. The basic theme of the experiment
does not comply. The Vietnamese pigs are clearly vegetarians and fruitarians
that mean they would fit for this experiment much better. So I pointed out a
mistake in a funny way and showed the way to meet the basic theme of this attempt.
Is it a mistake, that I did it in the form of fun and not too seriously? If
after such a response Dalibor bangs his head against
the wall, I cannot say, I do not know him so well.
MB
Miloslav,
I breed hens, broiler chickens for a legitimate reason. As a child I was very
happy to eat chicken, particularly chicken thighs, which we had with my brother
almost every Sunday and our parents had the rest of the chicken. We could thus
my life eat up at least 500 chickens, broiler - chickens. The lives, which I
took them, cannot be given back. The only perhaps excuse I have is, that the
food was cooked for us by our parents, who did not alert us about the injustice
of our meal, my parents were not alerted again by their parents and so it goes
to the first great great grandparents. Therefore, I
breed chickens, broiler chickens whom I saved their
lives before being slaughtered to make them up and to myself my own sin of
excessive eating of chickens in my childhood and youth.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 25, 2010 3:49:01 p.m.
Message :
Today died one hen - chicken –
broiler, I suppose that cannibalism occurred among chickens (as I consulted
with one breeder) and the other powerful hens pecked it to death. I treat
chickens in the garden and I feed them only different kinds of corn, wheat,
sunflowers, millet, flax seeds, corn, grain selection for exotics (exotic birds
like parrots), not any ground meal, where there may be the death from
malnutrition. Also this peel ground meel
is necessary to feed adequately only if there is a lack of grains and risk of
death of other living creatures from hunger. Chickens in the literature
need animal protein. As my chickens come from broiler farm just before
slaughter, they obviously cannot dig out from the ground worms, beetles and
insects, so they referred me a lack of animal protein. Therefore, I have in
line with the literature added them to water one liter of skimmed milk, i.e.
low-fat milk and prepared about 4-5 hard-boiled eggs, which I crushed with
shells and salted, because the shortage of salt may be another cause of their
cannibalism. The hens ate the eggs with appetite, especially the inside
without shells, but they did not like milk that much, so I will see. One
agronomist advised me in accordance with literature to give them the seasoning
preparation Maggi, in our shop they have only the klasik
from Vitana. Tomorrow I'll ask the vet.
Literature: http://www.zoofarma.cz/publikovane-clanky/ceska-slepice-a-lidove-zvyky.htm : Ing. Aleš a Bc. Daniela Bukovských, Chovatel 6-2008 , http://www.ceskatelevize.cz/program/1095970013-26.06.2010-13:05-1-chcete-je.html?deid=4077 : Seriál o hospodářských zvířatech , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kur_dom
% C3 % A1c % C3 % AD , http://www.zemedelske-potreby.cz/pro-drubez/ : Zemědělské potřeby M+S s.r.o. – Minářová a Sedlák , http://www.centrumkrmiv.cz/product/smes-n1-pro-slepice-50-kg-322/ : ANIMO CZ s.r.o.
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 26, 2010 2:41:40 p.m.
Message :
The vet did not approve skimmed
milk, because it has a laxative effect, so I poured it away. In the liquid soup
seasoning from Maggi Nestlé Professional, Mezi Vodami 2035/31, 143 20
Literature: http://www.nestlefs.cz/produkty_detail.asp?id=96&segment=&kategorie=7&znacka=2&hledat= , http://www.odpovedi.cz/otazky/z-ceho-se-vyrabi-polevkove-koreni-magi
The vet advised me mineral
supplement VITAPLASTIN forte with bioplex from Bioveta, Tyršova 409/40, Ivanovice in Hana in a paper bag,
which should not be made of animals (apparently it is known from its 3 years
period allowed for serving), the organic substance contains only amino acids
hydrate and vanilla, which is produced today from microbiological sources. Then
I decided to continue to feed them hard -boiled hen eggs and the shells. I'm
thinking in emergency situations as well to buy mealy worms in a local pet shop
(according to my vet appropriate) freeze them in the freezer to daze them (in
the literature fishermen do so, after thawing the worms come back to life
again) and then in the event, that their cannibalism will continue, feed them
frozen to chickens.
Literature: Biochemistry , Zdenek Vodrazka
, Academia ,
I'll give to my dog every three days a chicken sausage. Hens are adults and
they are not as young as chickens. Chickens are on a lower evolutionary level
then my dog Bad, who is a mammal that is why, hens
have less developed nervous system and feel less pain. This will not be hens
from organic(bio) breeding, because they are large
factory farming, predominantly supplied by commercial networks and have a
greater mortality rate than caged hens on the farms. They will not be
kosher-slaughtered chickens, because the kosher slaughter chickens are
jugulated and let bleed to death in full consciousness, because kosher meat
must not be from the dead body and must be bled. According to my vet chickens
and other animals must be stunned before killing under the current legislation
(the exceptions are for kosher slaughter), usually by electric shock, and then
killed. According to me the best is to cut the throat, like in kosher
slaughter, but in the suspended state, which is more merciful then a kosher
slaughter of the Jews.
Literature: http://granosalis.cz/ebooks/evolucniteorie.htm : Evoluční teorie - věda nebo
náboženství, Ing. Josef Potoček, josef.potocek@mmhk.cz , GRANO SALIS NETWORK, 2004 , http://www.magazinzdravi.cz/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=1481 : Máme rádi zvířata?, organizace "Svoboda zvířat". , http://www.ochranazvirat.cz/222/czech/clanek/martin-komarek---jsou-koser-porazky-koser-/ : NADACE NA OCHRANU ZVÍŘAT
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 26, 2010 7:59:44 p.m.
Message :
Mealy worms for the hens were
not still needed. Two other hens were affected by joints swelling and due to
that were limping probably because of the fact, that they were on broiler
fattening farm for slaughter, where is the emphasis on rapid growth of muscle
and bone strengthening neglected. Other fowl pecked those two limping hens and
did not let them any food, so they died. Therefore the vet gave the other two
hens with a swelling a restorative injections and we hid them under a larger
crate with bars on the sides, we put them there grain and water to save them
from attacking of the rest of the flock of hens.
When I further fed my dog Bad – with a vegetarian food of a top quality brand
on the market from the Italian Dog company AMI srl, Corso Milano 5, 35139 Padova,
Italy www.aminewws.net., Although he ate with appetite, unlike many other cheaper
vegetarian food, which I have ever bought, after some time he threw up the
yellow water and had trouble keeping himself on his paws. At that time I also
fed him eggs, especially fried like I ate alone, so I think, that a dog is a
carnivore, therefore he would not survive permanently without meat. According
to the Philosophy of Balance, however I should give him the meat as little as
possible, so that he suffers from no serious health problems.
I also found out, that there are not sausages made exclusively of the hens on
the market, chicken sausages are made from chicken meat significantly (but it
is not merciful to kill a baby chicken and therefore not in line with the
Philosophy of Balance, it is better to kill an adult hen), but there are also
pigskins added to them. On the market are only available frozen hens, which I
need to buy and cook them in the water for my dog.
Literature: http://www.mizici.com/article.php?aid=24 : Uzeniny - salámy, David Mizera ; ing. Ivana Lepešková: http://www.agronavigator.cz/default.asp?ch=1&typ=1&val=12326&ids=0
Vet advised me that there are also dried eggs for dogs. (A dried spice mixture
of yolks and whites) from the company OVOTRADE Ltd., Pitrová
269, 503 46 Třebechovice pod
(See www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 30, 2010 5:59:31 p.m.
Message :
Two hens,
which were affected by swelling of knees, as I mention above, died despite all
care of veterinarian. I paid for an autopsy, where was found, that in both
cases the diseases of hens were twofold, firstly it was probably from a
bacterial infection from catching cold (they had in the bodies the pus) and secondly
osteoporosis, a bone rararefaction due to their
selection for meat and, that they should be slaughtered long ago. I therefore
have now 44 hens-broiler-chickens, from a total of 50 and one more is limping.
On the recommendation of the vet I gave antibiotics to the water for hens and I
mix with water vitamin D2 for bone formation, which is unlike animal vitamin D3
vegetable vitamin D-ergokalciferol, there is a risk
of overdose by vitamin D2. I continue to add to their feed the above Vitaplastin.
Literature: http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitam
% C3 % ADn_D
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July 31, 2010 6:28:26 p.m.
Message :
quote :
Post of Miloslav Bažant
Dalibor.
See and the experiment is finished because the expperiment interferes with side effects that change the
outcome of the experiment. Continuation of experiment therefore has no
significance, and if to those hens you add antibiotics to the diet, their meat
is inedible. The only reasonable thing in this situation is to finish the
experiment, to kill hens and froze meat not to get it spoil. Otherwise it will
be just appropriate for your dog. Oh, and do not forget to take giblets and
remove the feathers before freezing. Then it would not be possible. Otherwise
it is nonsense to look for cervical of hens. The best it is to take them by the
rear legs, to give them a head on the block and with an ax to cut off his head.
This is the fastest death and hen feel no pain at all and if it felt so it will
forget it immediately. You can rotate with it, but through, that you stress it
to death.That the body moves by cutting off the head
you do not mind. Body without head does not feel pain. Neighbor once killed a
rooster that flew up without head to the roof of house.So
you should keep it until it stops moving and away from your body so you would
not be dirty from blood. If you're squeamish, you prefer to invite a neighbor
or neighbor woman villagers. For them, it will be easy.
So, if you do not provide to those broilers antibiotics and substances for bone
formation, they die. Will you deliver this to them, you will prolong them a
little life, but the meat is so appropriate for a dog and they will die in
pain. If you do not want to eat the flesh of those it is possible, that your
four-legged friend takes it and there is a possibility, that you give it to
neighbors. Paying the antibiotics and food supplements has no sense. The flesh
you destroy and the experiment is finished as well from external influencing
factors.
MB
quote :
Post of neronis
Dalibor, maybe you could try to do experiment with
yourself. When you have so many hens, get a machete, well do it keen-edged, put
some clothes that will protect you, take them all into a small closed room and
cut them to pieces and kill all alive.
It might be interesting for you in terms of adrenaline, and whether something
breaks in you. Anyway, the resulting feeling could mean a new experience, you
still probably do not have.
According to
the Philosophy of Balance I have to kill the least possible amount of living
creatures (only for the protection of life), if so then those naturally feeling
the least possible pain, therefore I am obliged to treat broiler-chickens-hens,
until their inevitable death, except drugs from killed mammals and possibly
killed fish.
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: August 4, 2010 11:45:48
Message :
My dog Bad eats fundamentally what I give him from my
almost fruitarian food, then also in his dish the vegetarian granules. When I go to my parents, so there he eats food of their cat and
from my father he usually gets about one sausage (probably pork or chicken),
that I am not able to prevent. It is not good, that I give him more at
the extent necessary, hen meat, because he does not need it, i.e. he does not
vomit and is not underweight (his weight
…
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: August 7, 2010 3:39:28 p.m.
Message :
quote :
Post of Dalibor Grůza
quote :
Post of ( see http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1375 ) and corrected by Dalibor Grůza
I decided to adopt to my family a hen and a rooster
which risk the death for their aggression on farms, just as I took to the
family from the animal shelter my kind but perhaps coward dog Bad (comes from
English word bad or spoken English buddy friend) to follow a scientific
experiment, when I will feed them only plant foods, eggs and milk , except
what they can get from someone else or find in the nature, by which I ,
hopefully with all of you , save the world and begin achieving a paradise for
all of us :
According to the Philosophy of Balance there are three solutions :
1 ) My dog Bad and all hens will die and then I myself apparently from
malnutrition and lack of appropriate nutrients, which according to the
Philosophy of Balance could mean either a majority of vacuum or waving with the
speed of light in the Universe .
With high probability I can exclude this possibility on the basis of a
scientific experiment, that I conducted on myself by shifting to diet based
fundamentally on plant seeds, plant fruits, milk (biomilk
in case of bone pain, especially the feet pain - about
Literature: http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega-3_nenasyc3
% A9_mastn % C3 % A9_kyseliny, http://www.knivic.unas.cz/omegapodrobne.htm : Esenciální mastné kyseliny
2) Bad - my dog will not survive
without meat, even though we will receive eggs of both hens, milk and plant
foods, and I will have to kill one or both chickens by hypnotizing it, rotating
it and then chop off its head cutting through its cervical. It will bleed to
death, which would mean a painless death for the chicken with the least
possible anxiety prior to their death because they sleep deeply and due to the
shock of cutting the carotid artery it will not feel pain in the sleep before
its brain dies out through exsanguinations (except hypnosis see the Torah or
Old Testament thus five books of Moses).
Above mentioned could according to the Philosophy of Balance mean the evenness
of the vacuum and waving at the light speed in the Universe.
3) Survival of the Bad-my dog as well as of both hens on only acceptable
vegetable diet, eggs and milk and on what they find without my knowledge (hens
in the garden, Bad on walks).
This idea, according to the Philosophy of Balance, could mean balance of nonabsolute vacuum and waving at speed of light in the
Universe and the possibility of objects movement on the speed of light on a
non-zero resting mass –Christ (according to the Special Theory of Relativity
about infinite energy) and absolute vacuum beyond our Universe limits
represented by this absolute vacuum - Devil and waving on the speed of light -
Christ in our Universe, thus God who reduces from theological reasons of
rectification of sinners in the world the current entropy – burn out – the
homogeneity of the Universe by returning its previous state of the vacuum and
the waving at speed of light in our Universe (here comes the final
reconciliation of the Devil and Christ in the infinite time).
Note: Projection of the garden space for one or two chickens is about 4x6m (
Questions, that I would like to answer:
- How big do you think is suitable space for two or one hen?
- Should I get a rooster or a hen first, or just a rooster or just a hen only
(probably I will get attacking individuals from big scale farming, who would otherwise
have to be killed)
- What are going to be the symptoms of irreversible death threat at chickens
and Bad according to your opinion?
(The Philosophy of Balance, see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Dear all,
to summarize the partial results of the experiment in my garden, the
possibility number ad 2) of my initial post (see above) came to a fullfiment, because there were natural deaths of three of
my breeding hens and one hen was eaten by my dog Bad.
That would mean the temporary balance between good and evil, between the waving
at the speed of light and vacuum in our world. Not about a predominance of
waves at light speed - Christ or a absolute vacuum -
Devil, which would save out our world, see the possibility of ad 3). At the
same time Bad - my dog, the remaining chickens and I are doing quite well,
which would exclude the possibility number 1 see ad 1), which is a predominance
of evil, the Devil - a nonabsolute vacuum or Christ
–waving at the speed of light in our Universe.
I'm not at the end with my attempt, but preliminarily we can say, that we
cannot rely in our world for cooperative intervention from outside, Christ –
waving at the speed of light and the Devil a nonabsolute
vacuum (see option ad 3) and it is necessary to at least come from assigned
Jewish philosophy, thus ensure for all close creatures - surrounded living
beings, especially animals as dignified, longest and happiest life as possible
and the most merciful death.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Act, so that you
may love the Devil-death-nothing, or partial conclusion of my experiment as a
balance of light, virtually electromagnetic waves and the vacuum in our
Universe.
Now I try to explain, what is the consequence of the fulfillment of possibility
Ad 2) above, then by my experiment indirectly proved the balance of the
Devil-almost perfect nothing-nonabsolute vacuum and
the Christ- light - almost perfect anything in our Universe in daily life of
every person or other living creature:
Man as well as other living creatures have a choice between two types of behavior
: 1) the bad acts, then causing unnecessary death, a human is pushed to the
mental and physical distress, the unnecessary death of another begets evil,
unnecessary death for the wrongdoer in the form of fear and hatred of
death-Devil after the glut and removal of pleasure of wrongdoer from his or her
direct or indirect causing unnecessary death of living creatures, and 2) the
balanced behavior, thus causing as little as possible death (passively by
forbearance, but also actively by action) of other living creatures than
humans (only for the protection of life), so that those living creatures feel
as little as possible pain, when the Devil-death-almost perfect nothing gets
his good purpose, therefore, necessary merciful death of living creatures is to
save the life of other evolutionarily more advanced living creatures that would
otherwise starve (because living creatures can live only at the expense of
death of other living creatures), through this balanced action the merciful
death-evil is balanced by good-life, even the Devil-the death-nearly
perfect nothing we can love as our neighbor.
A person, who is not a savior, is not able in addition to the above bad and
balanced action to act the exclusive good, because for all his or her actions
no matter how good the energy is extracted from food, then from eaten killed
living creatures, then evil can always be concerned as the balance of that evil
with good, thus maximum the above balanced action that has to be as to me the
meaning of our lives.
My balanced action in practice, which now represents especially my nearly
fruitarian diet (in principle only except eggs and milk) and my keeping and
rescue of my dog-Bad from the dog refuge and my next breeding and rescue of 44
fed broilers-chickens-hens, which had been intended to direct slaughter before,
also see my other posts in this topic .
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
|
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: August 14, 2010 10:02:53 p.m.
Message :
In addition to the best vegetarian food-pellets AMI -
Dog (during which exclusive use my dog Bad vomited yellow water in the past) as
I set out above, and two other vegetarian foods, it tasted him less, I give my
dog Bad every two days one hard boiled egg (I eat
two, eggs should however, be served cooked, although not yet demonstrated that
unbaked eggs could cause health problems of dog, but albumen of raw eggs
contains the component part avidin that prevents dogs
to use biotin, so it is not recommended feeding dogs on a larger number of
albumens, see http://www.kocko-psi.estranky.cz/clanky/potraviny-vhodne-pro-psi.html : Vhodné potraviny pro vašeho psa ) poured by soup seasoning VITANA klasik
and newly also I give him a curd cheese Lučina from Povltavské dairies. Experts from the
As the curd can be also produced from the rennet from the stomachs of killed
calves used in the clotting of milk, cottage cheese should be chosen from
microbial rennet or solely by sour. This should satisfy Olešnický
soft curd , Olešnický fine curd and Olešnický fat curd from Olešnická
dairy, Curd - soft, fine, fat from the dairy Želetava,
but in Hustopeče they are not available. That's why I
bought for a dog the Lučina curd cheese from Povltavské dairies, which should be from microbial rennet
(see http://www.csvv.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=676:syry-bez-syidel-z-telecich-aludk&catid=50:potraviny-a-vegetarianstvi&Itemid=100035 : Sýry bez syřidel z telecích žaludků, Jitka Skočková, Česká společnost pro výživu a vegetariánství).
Furthermore, before I would kill for my dog Bad and before I will feed him
mealy worms or other insects or my living chickens, so I will feed him dead
chicken in my fridge, which died without slaughter in a natural way, but first
it must be boiled in water for a long time to kill bacteria in its body which
caused its death. At the same time I am obliged to feed him before slaughter of
live insects and hens on other long-cooked carrions of animals that died
naturally without slaughter and, that I could get through my vet. All this, however, only if my dog Bad will not survive on above vegetarian
diet and he will vomit, be underweight, in allergic shock, or he will have motoric problems.
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 15/08/2010 12:55:48
Message:
quote:
Post of Miloslav Rookie
Dalibor.
You've got your pursuing., that we can consider as
correct. There is a default state, i.e. the contemporaneous. Between these
conditions there is the path that must be logic. If we consider this path as
illogical, not connected and we see here mismatch of cause and effects, then it
is between the base line and required target absent for us. If
you describe the experiment (in your garden), it should aim to clarify or to
prove a logical step. That the experiment description, which you
announce to us, had some meaning, we should know at advance from you what there
is concerned. Otherwise it has no meaning for us, and somehow it has no meaning
to watch it.
Do therefore what you should do at the very beginning. Describe the path from
current state to the desired, or if this happens, such a result will be created
and thus such and such starting point will be if we do this or that, there will
be new state etc.
So far I do not know the logic path from the starting point to the required. I
can only conclude that there is no logical connection. But you can know
something I do not know and that logic can be linked by it. You've done nearly
nothing in this regard and then it does not make sense to talk about it at all
and then I cannot be even interested in experiments leading from nowhere to
nothing.
MB
Miloslav.
My dog Bad evolved from the wolf, which is primarily a carnivore in nature. My
experiment is to try to describe how:
1) how my dog survives in good health on a vegetarian diet, cooked eggs and
microbial or souring clabbered curd or semi-hard or curd cheese
2) if necessary I give him as few as possible of naturally dead mealworms or
other insect died without slaughter, to be healthy,
3) if necessary I give him as few as possible of meat from carrions of dead
animals in a natural way without slaughter, to be healthy,
4) if necessary I give him as few as possible for this purpose slaughtered insects
and as few as possible of naturally dead insects without slaughter, and as few
as possible of the naturally dead carrions of animals without slaughter, to be
healthy,
5) if necessary I give him as little as possible of meat for that purpose
slaughtered adult hens and as few as possible naturally dead insects without
slaughter, and as few as possible of the naturally dead carrions without
slaughter, and as few as possible for this purpose slaughtered insects to be
healthy.
As criteria for a serious health threat of dog, I set after trying my
fruitarian diet these:
1) vomiting,
2) allergic shock,
3) malnourished underweight of dog
and after an earlier attempt to give the dog only vegetarian granules, when he
vomited the yellow water, even further:
4) movement-motoric problems of dog.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: August 15, 2010 1:17:58 p.m.
Message :
quote :
Post of JRF
Post of Dalibor Grůza
4) movement-motoric problems of dog.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Dalibor , it is interesting, that your attempt to balance the dog causes motoric problems ...
As soon as I
saw about two years ago the motoric-movement problems
of dog in his exclusive use of the above vegetarian food AMI Dog I visited the
vet, who gave him an injection of vitamins and nutrients, probably from the
killed animals, and I enriched my dog feeding on meat from one to two sausages
(chicken and pork) and feline granules, which my father and my second mother
(stepmother) had given him one to three times a week while visiting my parents.
Now is my dog Bad in good health.
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: August 15, 2010 8:41:30 p.m.
Post:
…
Through this
experiment in my garden, in essence I prove the realisability
of my Philosophy of Balance, thus the possibility of friendship of all living
creatures for life and death on a small scale. In my experiment there are
represented three in the nature life to death enemy species of living
creatures: a dog, originally a wolf in the wild, hens and human. If I succeed
in creating friendship among a man, my dog and my hens so we all will be
friends for life and death, the realisability of my
Philosophy of Balance will be partly proven, thus the possibility that all
living creatures in nature were accordance with their innermost wish friends
for life and death, that everyone like each other.
Thus, there is not the law of evolution of objective nature that all living
creatures must be together in groups, where only members of these groups of
living creatures like partially each other, and with other groups of living
creatures in contradiction to their innermost desire they must fight to the
death (i.e. similar to each other to death struggling various wolf packs, of
which members are all living creatures).
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: August 16, 2010 10:59:11
Message :
quote :
Post of kay
Dalibor, I would like to give you one question. I
confess, that I did not read your philosophy (and I do not look at this forum
regularly), it is possible that the question would be "a bit outside"
... if I understand well, so here you prove friendship among all living
creatures. Hens and dogs are domesticated animals and for them it would not be
such a problem in relation to a human. We have here but those species, for
which all attempts at domestication failed because of their wild nature, such
as the African buffalo or a grizzly bear. Those attempts at domestication have
been countless, never positive. If ever there was a friendship between a man
and grizzly, it would be really an exception, but I have personally never heard
about it. If however these species have mild nature (and thus could lead to a
friendly relationship with a man), they would have been domesticated and now
you are able to buy portions of them in supermarkets. You should therefore be
rather that for some species just a friendly relationship with a man cannot
emerge? You would have more appeal to the society and the conduct of man to
nature? I personally see a real danger (actual problem) in behavior of human,
not in relationship of animal and animal.
Kay
I agree with you so far, we are unable to deal with relations among
undomesticated animals themselves, because they are irresponsible. At the same
time, in my opinion we cannot talk about friendship of dogs and hens, because
cans and granules for dogs are made from chicken, virtually hen meat of
slaughtered animals, then even these domesticated animals continues in an
altered form of natural Darwinian struggle for life and death. The same is true
in humans, who eat hens, virtually chicken, but for human it is not
insurmountable problem to switch to a vegetarian, virtually fruitarian diet,
but if he or she keeps dogs or cats, so for them he or she is fighting that
Darwinian struggle for life and death, because he or she buys for them canned
poultry. Therefore, I have artificially created for me the simplest model
ecosystem hens-human-dog and I try to prove first, that it is under the force
of my Philosophy of Balance, that it is not necessary from a certain degree of
evolution to fight to the death with the other groups of animals, but it is
possible to establish other relationship and it is the friendship of these
evolutionarily advanced animals such as humans, domesticated animals, etc. for
life and death. In fact, we can say, that it is to prove the validity of
religion of love of evolutionarily advanced living creatures (humans,
domesticated animals) against the Darwinian theory of evolution fight of these
groups of living creatures for life and death.
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: August 16, 2010 7:27:41 p.m.
Message :
We can say, that I want to create a single wolf pack,
whose members will be friends for life and death, through its behavior outside
of the pack will be able to include gradually all living creatures, whose
achieved evolutionary perfection enables them to become members of this single
wolf pack.
Literature: http://www.vlci.info/ : Black Wolf, Vlčí svět (According to this
literature wolves in a pack support principally each other, simultaneously
together they fight for their position in the pack, but these fights rarely
finish with serious injuries, not to enfeeble the wolf pack.)
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: August 28, 2010 5:52:26 p.m.
Message :
For advice of
my vet, I decided to give to my dog one hard boiled
egg per day, not as till now one egg in two days (eggs should be almost one
hundred percent digestible for the dog). My vet claims, that my chosen diet,
thus three kinds of vegetarian granules, cheese Lučina
(i.e. cottage cheese with microbial and not animal rennet), and eggs, is
sufficient food for my dog Bad.
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: August 28, 2010 6:27:39 p.m.
Message :
Age of my dog
Bad is unclear. I have him for a year and three months. In a shelter for dogs
his age was estimated for two and half year, so he ought to be three years and
nine months old.
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: September 4, 2010 12:33:48
Message :
Today I discovered that someone had stolen me thirteen
hens, apparently for the purpose of slaughtering and eating them.
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: September 5, 2010 1:27:45 p.m.
Message :
I
observed my dog Bad to tremble, as if he is cold, and before, that I watched
his shortness of breath. According to my Philosophy of Balance, I could not
risk with him a life-threatening allergic shock, which could threaten him
according to me and the vet from the lack of animal protein. I experienced it
myself, when I ate only plant seeds, plant fruits and milk, when I began to
vomit, an itchy rash suddenly appeared on my skin all over the body, after eating
eggs I was relieved and the rash disappeared within two hours.
Therefore, I have diced and given to my dog Bad (weight approx
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: September 5, 2010 4:46:26 p.m.
Message :
quote :
Post of Miloslav Bažant
Dalibor.
This is currently the largest knowledge that results from your theory of
balance. I think, that because of this you could
create a certain conclusion. Beast digestion and metabolism, which were
formed for millions of years, it is unwise to change to a vegetarian because
from the vegetarian diet they are unable to get all the substances necessary
for life.
You cannot also change herbivores to the form capable of changing the mineral
substances for the organic parts, because they lack the capacity of
photosynthesis, or you cannot feed them humus and water them.
If you could conclude from your experiment that even the desire to change the
man on the herbivores, vegetarian and fruitarian is not right, because the
development of his or her metabolism is set to omnivorousness,
then this is your victory, and even for you it can take a value of life because
you save your life.
You're believer and believers are not normal to build opposition to God will.
You think you're called to repair what the God broke? You're more than God? If
you are not believer, then you substitute instead God the natural patterns and
evolution.
If your theory of balance should have the importance, then you need to focus on
humans and human society. I am trying to suggest it to you the whole time.
Focus on what people separate and look for ways what people unite. If you find
such a path, then people can agree among themselves on how to protect nature
and all living creatures. Animals cannot read your balance theory or to think
about it. People can do it. Focus on people and I will maybe even help you with
it.
Sláva
quote :
Post of Dalibor Grůza
Miloslav.
My dog Bad evolved from the wolf, which is primarily a carnivore in nature. My
experiment is to try to describe how:
1) how my dog survives in good health on a vegetarian diet, cooked eggs and
microbial or souring clabbered curd or semi-hard or curd cheese
2) if necessary I give him as few as possible naturally dead mealworms or other
insect died without slaughter, to be healthy,
3) if necessary I give him as few as possible of meat from carrions of dead
animals in a natural way without slaughter, to be healthy,
4) if necessary I give him as few as possible for this purpose slaughtered
insects and as few as possible of naturally dead insects without slaughter, and
as few as possible of the naturally dead carrions of animals without slaughter,
to be healthy,
5) if necessary I give him as little as possible of meat for that purpose
slaughtered adult hens and as few as possible of naturally dead insects without
slaughter, and as few as possible of the naturally dead carrions without
slaughter, and as few as possible for this purpose slaughtered insects to be
healthy.
As criteria for a serious health threat of dog, I set after trying my fruitarian
diet these:
1) vomiting,
2) allergic shock,
3) malnourished underweight of dog
and after an earlier attempt to give the dog only vegetarian granules, when he
vomited the yellow water, even further:
4) movement-motoric problems of dog.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Miloslav
I do not want to repeat again, thus I copy ideas according to Philosophy of
Balance for my experiment (see http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1375&whichpage=8),
now we have the possibility of ad 3) and the inevitable about
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: September 5, 2010 7:01:42 p.m.
Message :
I decided to
rename my dog Good (in English: good) instead Bad (in English: bad or buddy),
because even a carnivore and predator may be good if they do not eat meat
unnecessarily, and thus they fight for the friendship of all living creatures
to life and death.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Miloslav Bažant
Time: September 6, 2010 9:48:06
Message :
As even a
carnivore and predator may be good if they do not eat meat unnecessarily, and
thus they fight for the friendship of all living creatures to life and death.
Dalibor.
No carnivore, no predator eats meat without a reason. Too bad
for hunters, if they wipe out foxes in the woods. These beasts hunt the
weak and sick pieces for their livelihood. If missing, there are too many wild
animals without selection in the woods, i.e. the weak multiply and sick
individuals infect the healthy and strong ones. And so the result often leads
to the decimation of the wild animals in the woods.
There are also predators preying without hunger, but even those have their
place in relation to the balance in nature. I know. You regret their prey and
as the result you created the idea of the world in which this will be limited
in a maximum. Though this is not evil, but the impact of development and
evolution in nature. So it has evolved because so the balance arises. That's
why I always say, that you should rather watch these patterns of balance in
nature and try to understand them.
...
Sláva
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: September 12, 2010 4:43:26 p.m.
Message :
I had to give
my dog about
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: September 12, 2010 7:49:03 p.m.
Message :
quote :
Post of Miloslav Bažant
Dalibor
I do not know,
how old is the dog, but epilepsy starts this way at dogs. If the dog did not
have a diet that is needed for the organism, then such defects occur. If he
acquires needed substances, he can still heal. If you like him, then dump eriments and the theory of balance and fill his plate with
meat every day, or use dog granules. His nerves clothe with fat, he improves,
and probably a progression of the disease stops. His brain is missing
substances, which you denied him by experiment. Release him from an experiment,
if you like him as a friend.
Sláva
Slávo
maybe there's something right about it (see http://zviratka011.blog.cz/0908
). Rather I think my dog is endangered by allergic shock, because he was even
out of breath and he scratches, so I gave him a further approximately
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: September 14, 2010 4:34:28 p.m.
Message :
quote :
Post of Miloslav Bažant
Error Dalibor.
You cannot feed the dogs by chicken bones. The bones are hollow and when the
dog chewed them they are resulting in sharp slivers, which damage the digestive
tract and they may cause perforation of the esophagus and stomach. Moreover, a
dog will receive no nutrients, only calcium and to deposit calcium in its
bones, it needs more substances. Those bones are suitable for dog if they
contain marrow and by biting they do not create sharp apexes. However those you
did not give to the dog a lot, because biting them is an excessive burden on
the jaw muscles, which should be reflected by tearing eyes. It flows him from
the eyes and sometimes it goes up to the inflammation. Cartilages, you can give
them to him with no restrictions.
It is not about philosophy, but obviously you need necessarily to advise. So?
Sláva
Slávo,
I give him more cutted frozen meat from naturally
dead chicken, thanks for the information.
The vet examined my dog and found his examination in order, according to him he
is rather mild overweight. I let my dog do the analysis of blood, from which we
should recognize the inadequacy in the diet. The lack of meat, according to the
vet, is to show mainly through a lack of vitamin B12, iron and anemia, and
therefore a small number and small red blood cells. In case of my dog all the
physiological values of blood analysis are in the normal range, and therefore
my dog could even give a transfusion to other dogs, according to the vet the
epilepsy may be excluded with my dog from a lack of meat. My dog has adjusted
the blood level within the allowable range, so that he has the smaller size of
red blood cells (which have negative impact on the ability to carry oxygen),
which he has compensated with a larger number of red blood cells.
According to the vet it cannot be based on blood analysis to exclude allergic
shock.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: September 28, 2010 12:08:32
Message :
My dog had a feverish tremor again (I think he was
threatened by allergic shock), so I gave him about
To summarize the contemporaneous results of my experiment:
10th August 2010 I have stopped giving meat and bones to my dog, who had before
sufficient meat diet and I started feeding him one egg and about
5th September 2010, after 26 days, when he was completely without food from
dead animals, I found out his above mentioned feverish tremor and I had to give
him about
12th September 2010 after 7 days, when he was completely without food from dead
animals, I had to give him, because of his feverish tremor, further
approximately
28th September 2010 so after 16 days, when he ate only 3-4 about
My dog weighs about
So I had to give him from the 5th September 2010 to 28 September 2010, i.e. per
23 days approximately
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
author : Dalibor Grůza
Time: October 1, 2010 2:54:26 p.m.
Message :
My dog had a little feverish tremor today, but it was
unclear whether he makes it intentionally to get some meat, or if his body
feels actually the lack of meat. According to the Philosophy of Balance, I
could not take the risk of allergic shock, so I gave him about
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 03/10/2010 15:51:06
Message :
Quote:
Post of Miloslav Bažant
Dalibor, if you had not completed primary education,
then I would understand your acts. There remains animal blood in body of a dead
animal that blood deteriorates first and it contends deathly poisons. As the
result the meat of naturally dead animals is not consumed and it is not given
to feed to animals. These poisons in the blood arose earlier than you found
ever these dead pieces. That raw chicken meat has the smell of chicken and a
dog considers that food is also living individuals. The smell changes with
cooking. Therefore, we cook the meat, but those poisons you do not destroy with
cooking. If you have instead of a dog the vulture or hyena, then everything
would be fine, because they are against those deathly poison immune, but the
dog does not. You poison him, and you are still wondering, that he has tremor.
When his liver decays, the last he will shake and it will be end. Finally he
will rid of you and it will be after the suffering, that
you prepare for him. Speaking about decagrams of meat is ridiculous.
Sláva
Miloslav
basically I have nothing against boiling carrions, but in this case I consider
it unnecessary. Wolf as the predecessor of the dog eats the carrions, thereby
fulfilling the so-called forest health police. ( see http://www.selmy.cz/vlk/lov-a-potrava-vlka-obecneho/ : Hnutí DUHA Olomouc
) Moreover, as the experience of the old Jews: 31 And
ye shall be holy men unto me: neither shall ye eat any flesh that is torn of
beasts in the field; ye shall cast it to the dogs. (Exodus 22:30) Animal killed
in any other way (than the kosher slaughter), like an animal that died itself
is considered as carrion (nevela) and Jews is
forbidden to eat. Nevela, however, can be processed
for technical purposes, to feed it to animals, or to sell it. ( see http://www.omkosher.com/cz/koser-pravidla/ : PRAVIDLA KOŠER STRAVOVACÍCH ZVYKŮ, The orthodox council of kashrut MaHaRa'L, Praha
)
(see
www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
author : Dalibor Grůza
Time: 05/10/2010 15:49:07
Message :
...
Miloslav,
due to your urgent notice, I consulted it with a vet. According to the vet in a
frozen naturally dead broiler body botulinum toxin
cannot be formed, of which production takes place only under anaerobic
conditions (without air), the optimum pH is 4.8 to 8.5 and temperature around
30 ° C. (see http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botulotoxin)
Quick freezing of carrion, as I did, obviously prevents reproduction of
microorganisms (salmonella, listeria and avian flu,
etc.), but it does not prevent infection of these diseases by ingestion of this
meat. These diseases, however, have a high mortality rate, such as listeriosis at the age over 60 to 60 percent of those
infected people. ( see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salmonellosis #
Prevention , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Listeri%C3%B3za
)
Therefore, when feeding my dog carrions I should learn from ancient Roma.
Sometimes they dug also carrions (They boiled carrions in more waters.
According to the old Roma carrions are cleaner meat because the animal did not
die a violent death.) ( see http://www.mills.cz/assets/Absol_prace/AP2010-SP_denni/Rosecka-SP2010.pdf : Vyšší odborná
škola a Střední zdravotnická
škola, MILLS, s. r. o., Tereza Rosecká,
supervisor: ThDr. et Mgr. Ladislava
Marešová, Čelákovice, 2010, Život
romské menšiny)
)
Therefore, I will boil carrions for my dog in several waters.
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 11/10/2010 14:39:29
Message:
My dog had some diarrhea, I
gave him 3 days earlier about
(See www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 21/10/2010 19:24:49
Post:
Today I gave my dog other about
(See www.filosofierovnovah.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 23/10/2010 16:03:46
Post:
Me and my dog we have quite a
high consumption of eggs, by which we replace animal nutrients. I and my dog
eat roughly one egg per day for each of us. So far, we buy eggs from battery
cages breeding, as there is a lower mortality rate of hens than in the big
factory organic(bio) farms. The reason,
that one of the graduates of agricultural university told me, should be
that the breeding of hens with a higher clutch of eggs as well as their
aggressiveness increases. If there is regularly very aggressive hen in a large
factory organic(bio) farming of several thousands of
birds, and it is able before its exclusion from breeding to kill many birds,
while in the cage it can only threaten their neighbors. Yet in terms of
Philosophy of Balance organic eggs from a small domestic (organic) farming are
preferred, where overly aggressive hen is quickly detected and isolated from
other birds. So I decided to take 4-5 ten to twelve-week old egg layers-Italian
breed of fowl beside by me kept sterilized now adult broilers, which I had
previously rescued from slaughter, and so to humanize in line with my
Philosophy of Balance my dog and my egg diet.
Literature: http://www.stoptyranizvirat.estranky.cz/clanky/vegetarianstvi-a-veganstvi/vegani_a_vegetariani
, Title of the article: VEGETARIÁNSTVÍ, taken from vegan.cz, issued August 11,
2007, accessed October 23, 2010
(See www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 26/10/2010 21:13:17
Post:
I am not yet strong enough to
acquire laying hens, they offered me ten to twelve weeks old hens-Italian breed
of fowl, which I would however likely take until spring, so the young survive
the winter.
Literature: http://www.zoofarma.cz/publikovane-clanky/ceska-slepice-a-lidove-zvyky.htm,
Ing. Ales and Bc
Daniel Bukovský, Czech chickens and folk customs, the
Czech gold-speckled hen. Part second. Chovatel
6-2008, accessed October 26, 2010
As we mentioned before hens laid the eggs often out.
It was not uncommon, that a hen lays eggs in hiding and later it brings to the
courtyard covey of chickens. In controlled breeding the housekeeper deploys
eggs in early spring. A hen was sitting on eggs at the hEarth
in the room or alcove under the stairs to the attic. Newly hatched chicks were
under the bench along oven, together with the hen. The chicken feed was used
millet, cottage cheese, hulled grains of barley and grated boiled egg. It was
used different recipes of jumbles, that include fresh
kibbled nettles, crushed grain, hay granules and debris from the kitchen.
Later, after the launch of the chickens in the courtyard the main source of
food has been for chickens grazing. Adult poultry was fed only in winter
months. Through most of the year chicken sought food through grazing and they
collect insects in orchards, in the courtyard and adjacent dunghill. When
feeding, there was the use of a jumble of potatoes and cooked meal. Hens were
added crushed shells, crushed bones, skimmed milk and later forage lime for the
formation of solid eggs. In the absence of calcium in the rations hens laid
eggs without shells.They were called povrhel or šotka.
For the egg-laying hens nests and wicker brooding cages were established. It
was used as bedding straw or hay. In them there were often deposited as base
variety. It happened that the housekeeper had to throw away nests unwanted hens
or they were used for other poultry brooding. Especially they were used for
breeding ducks. Every cluck reduced performance. Therefore clucking chicken
they hung in different baskets. By custom they were given at an air draft,
darkness or even soaked in cold water.
(See www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 13/03/2011 20:48:32
Message:
…
I have separated from adults newly purchased chickens, which I closed in
a press room above my basement and gave them straw and food, because adults
would not let them eat and would kill them otherwise.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Note: My broilers lay eggs in my home farm all the year 2011, ie from their age of about 1 year, but they often eat them,
but roosters are probably infertile.
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 22/01/2012 16:33:51
Message:
I learned from the experience of my breeding-shelter of hens-broilers, that at least some hens do not survive only on plant food, seeds, non-animal minerals and water without they would be threatened due to lack of animal food by serious illness or even death. So I now enriched the diet of my hens with the rests of naturally dead hen, which I have in my freezer and remained me after I used necessary amount of it as food for me and my carnivorous dog.
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 02/03/2012 13:40:42
Message:
Chickens are pecking each other, according to the vet they may lack the essential amino acids, because in the garden there are not any insects in the winter and, that they do not devour insects at all, and therefore I will feed them under his recommendation by Vitana Classic, liquid protein hydrolyzate from soy and wheat gluten that is the most digestible form of plant amino acids, I will give them soy beans and cooked crushed body i.e. meat of a dead chicken without feathers, which I have in my freezer.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
2.2 Breeding snakes or recovery of biblical paradise from spoiled biblical
paradise or hell as a community of mutually alive-eaten hidden snakes http://forum.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1375 : Ráj začíná vědeckým pokusem na mé zahradě
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 24/04/2014
21:45:43
Message
Many snakes are
different from other animals, because for the present they cannot eat the cadavers of other living
creatures, whether they died by a natural death, or they were slaughtered eg. by a human, and for the present they must eat
live prey.
Now some rational mystique according to the Philosophy of Balance.
Hell is
according to the Philosophy of Balance the community of hidden snakes (also because all the animals apparently evolved evolutionarily from reptiles, see reptilian brain archicortex in a human and for the present the snake is cursed animal according to Bible, see Bible Genesis 3,13-15), who eat each
other alive (see above). In the hell so there is a huge fear for their life, or
in case of strong snakes for the life of their children, if they are weak. In
addition there is a huge conflict of the soul between its good nature, thus the
desire of all living creatures to live in a world where everyone likes each
other (see Philosophy of Balance) and a huge hatred among members of the hell
because of their mutual terribly cruel eating each other alive. These snakes are in constant conflict between their desire for paradise for all living creatures, i.e. for the love of everyone and a survival instinct, i.e. until their death they must still cruelly devour some animals alive, i.e. members of hell in order not to die of starvation. This mental
conflict causes at all individuals in hell gradual insanity, either the
schizophrenia from fear or the depression and suicides and self-harm from the hate
to themselves. In the head of hell then there is the
Devil, as its leader who has the respect of all members of hell, i.e. community
of snakes, because he is apparently the son of God, God's tempter and God's
righteous executioner, who, although he must lead the hell and be here as
the embodiment of unmerciful death as educational apparently God's penalty of
hell members, he does not like it and he wants to return to paradise as the
embodiment of merciful death in paradise, see below.
Against the above
hell we can put the heaven, that on earth can be embodied as a biblical
paradise, here it is again the predation or eating the cadavers of living
creatures by its members, but unlike the hell there are not eaten animals or
humans, but only plant fruits and plant seeds, which are practically living
creatures incarnated by single living cells, so that because of their
evolutionary imperfection they do not almost feel the pain of their death, and
therefore there is not the result of their hatred and hatred of their relative
living creatures.
From the above
it follows, that both in the case of hidden hell and in the case of paradise it is essentially a
system based on the same principle, i.e. eating cadavers, in the case of hell
it is its unmerciful form consisting in unmerciful predators and their prey,
i.e. the community of mutually eaten snakes, and in the case of paradise there
are merciful predators and their prey consisting in exclusive eating plant
fruits and plant seeds. One could say that the hell is actually a spoiled form
of paradise.
Now seriously.
A snake must eat
mostly alive-animals, because from alive animals the
energy or movement can be most easily obtained during the digestion or burning
of the food. One can imagine, that movement or energy
stored in the live animal food is with a big momentum density, whereas energy
or movement stored in the plant fruits and plant seeds is with low momentum
density, and therefore the more perfect digestive or food burning system is
necessary to release them, which snake does not have. The reason, that snakes
have not the more perfect digestive system able to burn plant food, is
according to the Philosophy of Balance probably mutual hatred and fear of
living cells in the body of a snake. Both mean, that the living cells of the
body of snakes resist digestion of food, either because of their mutual hatred
such as immune live cells of the snake body or because of revenge fear of the
living cells in the body of a snake as in the case of digestive cells of the
snake body, both for reason of causing big unnecessary death and pain by that
snake.
Now rational mystique again.
The above also
suggests how to recover the unspoiled biblical paradise from hidden hell or spoiled
biblical paradise as a community of snakes. It is necessary, that in hell the
hidden snakes still cause the least possible death and pain and thus to restore mutual
reconciliation of living cells in their body, at these snakes thus their
digestive system should be evolutionarily improved and then these snakes will
still better be able to digest more and more merciful food in the form of
cadavers of living creatures, until at the overall restoration of paradise we
all will eat only plant fruits and plant seeds.
Now seriously
again.
The proof of the
above theory, that snakes should be fed gradually if possible by plant
seeds
and plant fruits, in extreme emergency by eggs, in extreme emergency by
carrions of
living creatures died of natural causes, on principle of old
age, or in
extreme emergency by collected blood of non-slaughtered animals and
humans and by milk, or in extreme emergency by plants, or in extreme emergency by insects, or in
extreme emergency by
shells and snails, or in extreme emergency by fish or in extreme
emergency by birds or in
extreme emergency by
mammals or in extreme
emergency by humans, all always the most mercifully as possible bred and
killed, it is my
experience, that my body seems to be adapted for fruitarian food
consisting
only generally in organic plant fruits and organic plant seeds and in
extreme
emergency in organic potatoes, in extreme emergency in organic eggs
from a home breed, in
which one does not kill or does not get killed hens or roosters or
chickens, because I have not needed long to eat always in extreme
emergency carrions of animals at my fruitarian diet.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz )
2.3
Dairy cattle breeding http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1519 : Ráj pokračuje mým chovem mléčného dobytka
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July
15, 2010 4:59:47 p.m.
Message :
What
is in your opinion more merciful?
1) Drink biomilk from cows kept on pasture (not at one point in the
stable as with normal milk cows), but it is often in over-production,
because not much biomilk is sold and therefore biomilk is more
expensive as normal milk.
Or
2) Drink dried milk powder, which is also recommended as kosher food
for Jews, where according to some opinions is not necessary a
supervision of Rabbi at the source of milk production. Milk powder
makes possible to drink milk only when necessary and appropriate, not
to take milk from calves unnecessarily, but in fact it may lead to
limitation or killing in unchanged farms and slaughtering of calves so
the cows would have enough milk for drying. I would like to mention,
that in my correspondence with the Hare Krishna movement, who are
Hindus and vegetarians and worship cows, because they provide them the
only acceptable animal nutrients in milk, when they do not eat eggs,
they also buy milk powder from company Madeta.
Note:
- According to the farmers of the Hare Krishna Movement http://www.krisnuvdvur.cz/ : Farma Krišnův dvůr, 257 01 Postupice, where I wanted to buy dried milk powder (i.e., dry powder
biomilk due to the Indian Hindu way of breeding cows and bulls which
are castrated to oxes to be able to work with them at all, otherwise
they are wild and dangerous) milking cows have much more milk than a
calf needs.
Literature: Powdered
Milk - There are some Torah scholars who permit the use of powdered
milk which is made from regular milk since it is not in its original
form when it comes into Jewish hands. Most people who are careful about
Cholov Yisroel do not rely on this lenient ruling. http://www.star-k.org/kashrus/kk-issues-cholovYisroel.htm : see Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, Cholev Yisroel: Does a Neshama Good, KASHRUS KURRENTS, The Star-K Online
( see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July
15, 2010 8:10:40 p.m.
Message :
Dear
all,
The solution of
above-mentioned question is probably powdered biomilk, but only in
necessary cases like sore bones. As it offers a large dairy
company Lacrum Velké Mezirici in its product line
Amálka through the company Aromatis (see http://www.bio-info.cz/zpravy/lacrum-velke-mezirici-vyrazne-rozsiruje-svoji-bioradu-amalka : bio-info, Informační portál pro ty, kteří žijí BIO).
Dried biomléko is available at http://www.aromatis.cz/cz/amalka-bio/bio-susene-mleko/ : Amálka bio sušené mléko, výrobce AROMATIS, s.r.o.
Note:
Lacrum purchases biomilk from Czech ekofarmers. Since last year dairy
Lacrum embarked its own processing of biomilk. Lacrum buys all biomilk
from organic farmers in southern Bohemia, the Highland and area of
Tišnov and begins the cooperation with breeders from more
distant eastern Bohemia. “With ekofarmers we have so far an
excellent cooperation. Those who chose to supply milk to us, clearly
prefer our dairy because of its specialization, and variability of the
production program, all of them have visited us before signing the
contract and I personally believe, that they are happy, when they see
their specific product from their carefully produced milk”,
Karel Quast evaluates the cooperation with suppliers. Lacrum also
starts to cooperate with several conventional farmers who began a
transition period to organic farming. This provides to a dairy enough
of biomaterial for the growth of volumes in the future. "Within five
years we plan biomilk and biomilk products to form at least 50 percent
of production volume of Velké Mezirici Dairy", stated Karel
Quast. (see http://www.bio-info.cz/zpravy/lacrum-velke-mezirici-vyrazne-rozsiruje-svoji-bioradu-amalka : bio-info, Informační portál pro ty, kteří žijí BIO)
Organic milk has naturally higher levels of certain nutrients than milk
from conventional farms. Much higher levels of omega 3 fatty acids
(about 64% more) and 50% more of vitamin E. Scientific studies have
proven the fact, that organic milk has higher content of conjugated
linoleic acid (CLA, which favorably affect the immune system. Cows,
that consume lots of fresh grass and clover produce also milk with
higher concentrations of beta-carotene by 75 % than the content of
these substances in normal milk (from beta carotene our bodies produce
vitamin A). The content of antioxidants lutein and zeaxanthin are two
to three times higher. Not suitable for infants under 12 months! (see http://www.aromatis.cz/cz/amalka-bio/bio-susene-mleko/ : Amálka bio sušené mléko, výrobce AROMATIS, s.r.o.)
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: July
16, 2010 6:11:03 p.m.
Message :
quote :
Post of Miloslav Bažant
Dalibor.
Do you still know want you are talking about? I think you are
completely lost in the context. You are at philosophical forum. Do you
realize it? You will be surprised, but it is true. This rather belongs
to a chat about health or bionutrition. The thing, that you are a
vegetarian and peg the seeds is only your problem as well as what milk
is better or worse. You have focused on this equilibrium all your
theory, but it is not a philosophy, but rather a result of your
disease, because the causes are not related to the consequences.
Perhaps it could be, with a certain amount of tolerance, considered as
faith, or attempt to create a new religion, because faith does not
request so strictly the link between causes and their consequences as
rigorously as philosophy. Even a hypothesis must have a tied up
internal logic. Furthermore, a theory requires evidence to become the
theory. This is a basic condition. This, what you are showing here is
more of chatting than a real theory.
But why do I
write this when I know you will not get anything of it at all. Maybe it
is due to my stupidity and the attempt to help you.
You should show your entries to your psychiatrist. I think he will
increase you the dosage of medication and maybe just that will help you.
Otherwise, the best to eat is Pribináček. If you will eat
many Pribináček the balance of the Universe will change and
the sun will shine more. But it is more logical, that if you will eat
lots of garlic, you'll have more space around you, even in the crowd.
Here the causes refer to consequences and correspond to the same
result. The beans can lead you to the same result, but it is possible,
that you will not reach your goal. People can approach you and kick
your stinky butt. Here also causes correspond to their consequences.
MB
Miloslav,
Why do you think, that kosher food is so closely connected to Jewish
religion and philosophy, and again why do you think vegetarianism is so
closely connected to Hinduism and Hindu philosophy. So keep your
insults to yourself and start to thing again for once.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz)
Paradise continues with my breeding of dairy
cattle
Printed from: www.FILOSOFIE.cz Diskusní
fórum
Theme web: http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1519 : Ráj pokračuje mým chovem mléčného dobytka
Printed on: 28/01/2012
Theme:
Theme author: Dalibor Grůza
Theme: Ráj pokračuje
mým chovem mléčného dobytka
Time: 28/01/2012 10:19:08
Post:
Despite its being the largest milk producer in
the world, India's per capita availability of milk is one of the lowest
in the world, although it is high by developing country standards. The
per capita availability of milk, which declined during the 1950s and
1960s (from 124 grams per day in 1950-51 to 121 grams in 1973-74)
expanded substantially during the 1980s and 1990s and reached about 226
grams per day in 2001-02 The per capita consumption of milk and milk
products in India is among the highest in Asia, but it is still
growing. It is still below the world average of 285 grams per day, and
also the minimum nutritional requirement of 280 grams per day as
recommended by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) (see
Sharma et.al., 2003).
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 28/01/2012 14:46:42
Post:
www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 28/01/2012 15:06:46
Post:
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 29/01/2012 10:57:03
Post:
2.4 Breeding fleas http://forum.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1727 : Chov blech
quoted:
Post of Dalibor
Grůza
How to intervene mercifully against excessively reproduced fleas
Overpopulation of fleas threatens the life of a dog as well as an owner of an apartment, it is a vicious circle. The more blood females drink, the more eggs they lay. The more eggs they lay, the more blood their descendants drink again, if fleas prefer their reproduction to life in symbiosis with their host, so the amount of sucked blood is increasing by them exponentially and at their overpopulation their number must be reduced the most mercifully as possible by the human again to be given them the opportunity to learn them to live in symbiosis with their host. Therefore at flea overpopulation I recommend apparently veterinary products with the active ingredient propoxur from company Bayer as a collar for dogs, which is effective only on adult fleas, not on the eggs and larvae in contact with the animal, and let it work for a period of about 1-1,5 months, when the fleas development cycle lasts in good conditions on average 21 days and on the animal there is only 5% of the population, i.e. of adult fleas, the rest mainly larvae and eggs are in the ambient environment of the animal, thereby it is necessary to reduce the amount of the fleas and the collar must be removed thereafter to give fleas a chance again, whether they reproduce excessively or they do not reproduce excessively to live with their host in symbiosis.
The above insecticide (insect-killing)
collar is to be combined with the repellent flea collar, so that fleas do not
contact the insecticide-treated dog at all, possibly also after above removing of
above mentioned insecticidal collar, although efficacy of repellent collars,
which are in particular of organic basis, is generally poor according to my
vet. In my friendly pet store they
recommended me the repellent collar Bio Band from Dutch company Beaphar B.V. with
active ingredients: extract of margosa and lavender oil.
Literature: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propoxur
, http://www.google.cz/url?sa=t&rct=j&q&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcit.vfu.cz%2Ffarmvpp%2Fsoubory%2Fprednasky%2FPrednaska11Antitrematoda-anticestoda-ektoparazitika.docx&ei=VSrhU_v8Fu_T7AbUpICICA&usg=AFQjCNGnS87mvP4lYfv8W3HH9FEU5kPQhw&sig2=XwFgMbtYrA5JeueoM7mBpA : Farmakologie v produkci potravin, Veterinární a
farmaceutická univerzita Brno, Centrum
informačních technologií, farmakologie.webzdarma.cz/farmacka6.ppt : ANTIPARAZITIKA VE VETERINÁRNÍ
MEDICÍNĚ, Doc. MVDr. Alfred Hera, CSc.
, http://www.veterina-hruzikova.cz/Jak%20vyzrát%20na%20blechy.pdf : Veterina Vizovice - Lucie Hruzíková, http://www.ordinace.cz/clanek/anemie-chudokrevnost/ : Anémie (chudokrevnost), MUDr. Sylva Šebková, http://www.vseprozvire.cz/proc-chranit-psa-a-kocku-proti-blecham-a-klistatum--rizika--nemoci--prevence--reseni/ : Proč chránit psa a kočku proti blechám a
klíšťatům? Rizika, nemoci, prevence,
řešení, source of informations: Frontline,
Bayer, Bioveta a.s., http://www.muj-pes.cz/zdravi-a-nemoci/blechy-309.html : Text: Daniela Duchková and MVDr. Barbara Lenská, VETCENTRUM Duchek s.r.o., Photo: Daniela Duchková
, http://www.veterinarnipece.cz/diskuze/ : Penecos-N spol. s r.o., shop Pilsen and veterinary surgery
According to the rule of the Philosophy
of Balance:
2) A human has a duty to kill as few of living creatures as possible (i.e.
for the protection of life) and if so then those naturally feeling the least
pain.1) (i.e. according to me a human can kill any living creature only if the
probability of at least 95-100 %, that he or she saves in this way the life of other
living creature, so that in this way he or she caused the least possible death
and pain).
i.e. I cannot know, whether the above repellent collar works or not, i.e. 95-100% probability of saving the life of a dog and his or her
owner, when using the above insecticidal collar, is not fulfilled. It is possible, that this
repellent collar reduces the amount of blood sucked from the dog and thus it reduces
naturally gradually the amount of eggs laid by fleas and thus the population of
fleas.
In the above source of literature: http://www.veterinarnipece.cz/diskuze/ : Penecos-N spol. s r.o., shop Pilsen and veterinary surgery
there is opinion shared by breeder, that this flea collar does not
work, that
the above repellent collar " is totally dysfunctional in a month
… population
of fleas is on the dog again … “ "However it is
necessary to give this
collar a chance and for the present not to use the above mentioned
insecticidal
collar, because according to the literature: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margosa
it is in the case of margosa the plant Azadirachta
indica, which acts as a bio repellent. It is
necessary
to spray this repellent repeatedly, at least every ten
days. (It does
not directly kill insects. This is a repellent and egg-laying deterrent
protection.
The insects starve.) According to the literature: http://www.veterina-hruzikova.cz/Jak%20vyzrát%20na%20blechy.pdf : Veterina Vizovice - Lucie Hruzíková
"fleas survive without food for several months."
My aim is symbiosis of fleas with
dog, not their extinction, if it does not succeed in this manner while exclusively
using the above repellent collar to reduce the overpopulation of fleas, so it
will be necessary to use again the above mentioned insecticidal collar, which
should be according to the literature: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propoxur
relatively merciful, because
it was introduced in 1959 (the experimental animals almost forgot caused death
and pain after so long time) and it has a fast lethal effect.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 23/08/2014 06:44:30
Message:
My dog has great difficulties with fleas again,
because according to the literature it is necessary to spray this repellent
repeatedly, at least every ten days, I will
buy for him and use for him new above repellent collar sooner, than I would possibly use
for him the above mentioned insecticide collar again.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
)
3.1
Cultivation of potatoes http://forum.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1682 : Pěstování rostlin a vědecký důkaz Filos. rovnováhy
The cultivation of plants and scientific proof of
Philos. of Balance
Printed from: www.FILOSOFIE.cz discussion forum
Theme web: http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1682
Printed on: 29/09/2013
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 10/04/13 11:27:59
Message:
I bought 10 seed potatoes, the variety marabel, commonly grown in the Czech Republic I dug with a
hoe previously by a spade dug land line for these 10 pieces of potato in
advance, I killed the roots of weeds, which did not sprout in green plants,
they were still in a period of dormancy, I let to live not dug by hoe, i.e. in
order according to the Philosophy of Balance expected future symbiosis of the
plants-weeds and berries that have already sprouted in green plants. According to the Philosophy of
Balance it must be treated as a general principle to kill the pests only when
there is an excessive reproduction, and while if this is necessary and possible
with a probability of approximately 95%, immediately to save the evolutionarily
more perfect living creature or further human, otherwise it is necessary to
strive for their symbiosis.
We put the seed potatoes into the greenhouse for germination before the soil
will settle, which in the meantime I will dig with hoe
several times.
One potato was half rotten, so we cut it and we will plant only half after that
the cut side will become dry, which is possible according to my professional
adviser. This was the right approach because mold as fungi are evolutionarily
older than potatoes as plants, fungi are evolutionarily as roughly old or
perfect as algae and so according to the Philosophy of Balance fungi will be
able to feel the pain about as well as algae and less than plants.
Literature: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant#Evolution , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houby , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pl%C3%ADse%C5%88 , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%98asy , http://granosalis.cz/ebooks/evolucniteorie.htm : Evoluční teorie - věda nebo
náboženství, Ing. Josef Potoček, josef.potocek@mmhk.cz , GRANO SALIS NETWORK, 2004
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 10/04/13 11: 30: 31
Message:
My seed potatoes can be planted into the ground after
at least 10 days, when they germinate in the greenhouse.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 17/04/13 10:31:09
Message:
Yesterday we planted 10 pieces of seed potatoes into
the soil in the garden, even not sprouted. On the internet I have found and
saved on my computer, plant protection products, which can be used in organic
farming (see http://www.bioinstitut.cz/publikace/documents/vnitrek_final.pdf : Bioinstitut, Přípravky na ochranu rostlin registrované v ČR, které je možné použít vekologickém zemědělství, 2006 ), as well as fertilizers in
organic farming (see http://www.bioinstitut.cz/documents/Povolene_vstupy_do_pudy.pdf :
Povolené vstupy do půdyv ekologickém zemědělství, za finanční podpory SFŽP a MŽP, zpracoval Bioinstitut, o.p.s., Olomouc 2011 ), first of all I should use them
in the cultivation of my potatoes in an excessive reproduction of pests and
fertilizing my potato plants. I made a mistake yesterday when I killed
while potatoes planting a few young plants of weeds by digging, though it was
not my causing necessary death and pain. This error would be no longer
repeated, because it prevents the symbiosis of pests and my plants of potatoes,
which is the aim of my experiment.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 09/05/2013 22:40:45
Message:
There are two kinds of agriculture or the food chain,
in the first case, the parasitic-predators food chain, or agriculture. The
parasitic agriculture is the standard contemporary agriculture, where it
worsens the life of animals, insects or plants in their fitness in favor of the
parasitical species of human, in the case of livestock, or in the case of the
so-called pests of plants as their hosts. The predatory agriculture is in the
case of the so-called. organic farming, which is maximally keeping fitness
during the life of farm animals or pests of cultivated agricultural plants,
that these farm animals or plant pests were humanely killed in favor of the
predator, which is human.
Both of these approaches as parasitic current standard agriculture and organic
agriculture, which today has evolved from a right-wing philosophy of Rudolf
Steiner and his biodynamic agriculture, are based explicitly or implicitly on
the theory of evolution of Charles Darwin about the necessary mutual merciless
fight of various kinds of living organisms for life, it should be concerned the
necessary fight for the life and death of these organisms in nature.
In the case of organic farming one can talk about the struggle for life and
death among the people themselves. Between human races, because organic farming
food favors quality at the expense of their low quantity and hence high price,
simply said a narrow group of people, especially the rich people in the West,
while a limited range of agricultural land, should have available an overall
small quantity of organic quality more expensive food, while most of the poor
people particularly in the developing countries as a result of this limitation
of the amount of food in the context of organic farming will die of starvation.
In the case of the current standard agriculture, you can talk about the fight
of life and death between the human species and other living creatures, when
this agriculture sacrifices the fitness of living creatures in their life
except people for nutrition of mankind.
Both of these approaches are so in conflict with the idea of merciful nature
and the possible sovereign merciful God, who should rule out certain living
creatures of his love, whether the above poor people, livestock or above
mentioned plant pests, although this possible sovereign merciful God should be
also their creator, apparently through the evolution of nature.
In the second case, it is by me offered model of the food chain that could
be described as symbiotic agriculture based on the fact that the symbiosis of
all in this agriculture participating living creatures will bring in the long
term all these living creatures the highest possible benefits, and even greater
benefits for the people, than the above form of the parasitic current standard
agriculture or predatory current organic agriculture can bring to them.
The symbiotic plant agriculture is basically the development of organic
plant farming method, from which it takes most of the procedures, from the
current standard parasitic plant farming it takes only a small minority of
procedures, and so depending on the fulfillment of the basic obligation of each
to cause the least possible death and pain, it is fundamentally organic plant
farming developed on the principle of eliminating plant pests only when they
are in an excessive reproduction everything under the least possible death and
pain.
Namely, by me envisaged symbiosis between Elytrigia
and Colorado potato beetles and by me grown experimental plants of potatoes can
bring a big harvest of quality, i.e. healthy, potatoes.
The theoretical reason for greater yield and food quality of symbiotic than
the above parasitic current standard agriculture and predatory current organic
agriculture should be, e.g. in the case of potatoes, these contain
micro-organisms, in particular related to living cells of Elytrigia
and Colorado potato beetles, that are developed in the course of evolution
(we are all supposedly relatives, because we come from a single ur-cell, an example of a human in the human brain is the
parts related with reptiles called archicortex and
related to other mammals, also known as paleocortex),
that will not be harmful to potatoes in the case of their symbiosis with Elytrigia and Colorado potato beetle.
This is an experiment to prove the mercy of nature with the possible
sovereign merciful God as opposed to the dominant evolutionary Darwinism.
Figuratively-biblically speaking, the experiment to restore paradise in nature,
in the biblical paradise should also be, inter alia, the biggest possible
fertility and quality of cultivated plants and general symbiosis of all living
creatures, the goal is that even poor people, livestock and pests were mainly
by people regarded as creatures of the possible sovereign good God the possible
creator of the merciful nature that these merciful nature and possible God love
also as well as all other living creatures, and they want to be loved by them
and not to be hated.
(see http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pred%C3%A1tor , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parazitismus , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodynamick%C3%A9_zem%C4%9Bd%C4%9Blstv%C3%AD , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ekologick%C3%A9_zem%C4%9Bd%C4%9Blstv%C3%AD , series: "Once Upon a Time...
Life", in the original: "Il était une fois ... la Vie",
created by Albert Barillé, music composed by: Michel Legrand, characters designed by: Jean Barbaud,
copyright PROCIDIS-Paris, in the Czech Republic copyright: BH promo EN 2008,
the title track of Jan Mařasová, Ks, 1, 2, 4, 5 DVD
104 minutes, 3.6 DVD 130 minutes, 26 parts series, 3 DVD, episode "9. The
brain ", time 2: 30-3:55, the time of 4:10-5:48, time 11:30-21:50, 1 DVD,
volume 1. Cells - Their Amazing Story, time 3:20-8:20)
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 12/05/13 11:00:35
Message:
At my potato plants in the field I had a greater
amount of weeds, but not yet entirely too many, so I left it to live by the
rules of the Philosophy of Balance: 2.) A human has a duty to kill as few of living
creatures as possible (i.e. for the protection of life), and if so then those
naturally feeling the least pain. 1) (i.e. according to me a human can kill any
living creature only if the probability is at least 95-100% that he or she
saves the life of the living creature, so that in this way he or she caused the
least possible death and pain).
One farmer told me that my potato plants need for growth of green mass the
nitrate or nitrogen, that is produced synthetically in particular apparently
from waste plant and animal substances, mineral Chilean saltpeter is no longer
used, so I used carefully older hen excrements from my garden to fertilize,
on which plants of weeds already grew partially so that I did it in the way not
to harm them.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 16/05/13 20:10:10
Message:
On one of the potato plants I discovered two Colorado
potato beetles, I didn´t want right from the beginning a mortal hostility
between these beetles and my potato plants, so I took one of the two Colorado
potato beetles and I put it on the strongest of my high potato plant. One Colorado potato beetle on one
plant of potatoes, if they do not reproduce excessively, I would not kill it,
and at the same time the Colorado potato beetle is also a living creature that
has the right to life and to food as a basic rule of my Philosophy of Balance
that everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain.
Beetles as insects, among others the Colorado potato beetle and the potato
plant are as about evolutionarily ancient, i.e. approximately the equally
evolutionarily perfect, that is as about able to feel caused pain. If the
Colorado potato beetle does not reproduce excessively and it will be eating
occasionally some leaf of potato plant without killing it off, so while its
eating necessary to the survival of this beetle it kills, or digests only live
cells of this leaf as separate living individuals, living cell, however, is
evolutionarily older, therefore less evolutionarily perfect and less capable of
feeling pain than insects, among others the Colorado potato beetle and plants,
among others of potatoes, the obligation of each still to cause the least
possible death and pain will be complied with both in relation to plant of
potatoes and in relation to the Colorado potato beetle, as well as in relation
to the living cells of the leaves of plants of potatoes, also possibly eaten by
Colorado potato beetle.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
, www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 17/05/2013 16:44:41
Message:
Indirect evidence of the existence of the sovereign
good God?
In my opinion, most real materialists with Darwinism follow the idea of the
world or nature as a parasitic-predatory system (see the Satanism of the devil,
evil as ruler of this world), where an individual can be distinguished in
relation to people, but in particular as well as to other living creatures, to
predators or hunters, that mercifully hunt, or kill the prey and fight still
only for life with individuals outside their pack, and parasites, that
gradually drain the life from other living creatures, and even predators from
their pack, as long as it is possible. Darwinism, from which the above
parasitic-predatory idea of the world can derive, is the current predominant
notion of nature of the world, or the nature, and it is consciously or
unwittingly given in many believers. From the perspective of this idea there is
not good individual, it is always in fact either a predator or parasite, and
even in the context of a variety of charities. From the perspective of this
idea the symbiosis in the world serves only for better hunting or more
effective parasitism within their own group, or pack.
This enables you to stand against it the idea of potential or possible
symbiosis within the whole of nature, or of the world in relation to all the
living creatures, where predation and parasitism are marginal and only serving
better and effective symbiosis.
According to the above mentioned parasitic-predatory
image of the world it is the promise of salvation in symbiosis for a little
money, as a promise of many of today's alleged believers and the Churches, in
fact, it is the promises of above predators or parasites who pursue only their
own personal benefit and these parasites or predators then must get as many
assets to ensure their future life without work, and this until such time
before than it is found that in their case again it is not really anything
other than parasitism or predation. If they have received a large amount of
this assets by this time, so they will be able to after their unveiling as a
real parasite or a real predator to move someplace where they do not know their
lies yet or here or elsewhere they will use the acquired assets.
Additionally you can stand up against it the idea of the world, where there
is not exclusive the above parasitic-predatory nature of the world, or nature,
or the above symbiotic nature of the world, or nature.
My idea of a global or all-natural symbiosis, however, is able to refute the
above parasitic-predatory idea of the world, or nature, because it is
incompatible with it, and it is based on scientific and natural-scientific
access, and scientific experiment.
The first step is by me the reached symbiosis of
my dog and my hens as his only dead animal prey, when these chickens are
dying naturally, mainly of old age, under veterinary medical supervision and in
compliance with the applicable laws against cruelty to animals and then their
corpses are consumed by me and my dog. The argument from the perspective of the
above parasitic-predatory idea of the world could be that this is the only
possible by parasitism of me, my dog and my hens in particular the pests of
wheat and the wheat that I'm buying from the agricultural cooperative, where it
is grown according to the current standard way of agriculture and it does not
come from organic farming. At the same time the current standard and organic
growing plants corresponds to the above parasitic-predatory idea of the world
against so called harmful insects and against so called harmful weeds that are
without mercy killed in a standard agriculture or mercifully killed in organic
farming. From the perspective of the above parasitic-predatory idea about
the world, or nature, so it was only the extension of the boundaries of my pack
for my dog and my chickens, this pack, however, would be once again of above
parasitic-predatory nature, eg. in
relation to pests of wheat, which is the main food for my hens.
Against the foregoing reasoning of parasitic-predatory nature of the world,
or nature, albeit my above symbiosis between me, my dog and my hens I stand my
scientific experiment of the symbiotic cultivation of plants of potatoes, where
I should strike a friendship between my potato plants and their pests, in
particular, of Elytrigia and the Colorado potato
beetle dealt with the fact that their symbiosis is supposed to bring the
greatest possible benefits to all concerned, i.e. in the long term as well as
the largest crops of potatoes, in order to avoid losses caused by fighting
these economic plants and their pests at life and death.
The success of this scientific experiment can refute the above mentioned
parasitic-predatory model and to confirm the possibility of my whole life, and
hence the life of all other living creatures in symbiosis with other living
creatures in nature, it would be so next substantial evidence of in nature
hidden opportunity of symbiosis of the whole nature waiting to be discovered by
living creatures, in particular now by human. The failure of this experiment
would probably definitively refute the possibility of symbiosis of the whole
nature.
At the same time, this experiment is the indirect confirmation of possiblity of the existence of sovereign good God. The
possible invalidity of the law of exclusive symbiosis (i.e. harmony) would refute perhaps indirectly the possibility of the existence of the sovereign good God, if the sovereign good God made the world, or nature,
which would be inherently albeit partly bad, or horrible (see above parasitic-predatory idea
of the world), then there would be a clear conflict with the above expected
characteristics of His sovereignty or His goodness.
At the same time the third option, that human cannot
live in symbiosis (also elsewhere understood as harmony) with all of nature
and living creatures must always be on the expense of which the human
and his or her chosen and protected pack of living creatures live, that
the human would have to necessarily kill to survive and with which he or she
would necessarily fight on life and death (i.e. partial necessary parasitism or
predation), it would mean that the supposedly sovereign good God, hence by Him
allegedly created nature are very merciless.
In nature there is the question in addition to the
force of the law of exclusive harmony (i.e. symbiosis) or the law of exclusive
disharmony (i.e. parasitic-predatory image of the world) then the force of the
law of prevailing harmony or of the law of prevailing disharmony or no the law of harmony or the law of disharmony prevails
here. Only in the case of the above-mentioned law of exclusive harmony (i.e.
symbiosis) the Philosophy of Balance is not refuted, thus the permanent
duty of everyone to cause the least possible death and pain enforced and
punished by nature itself, in those other cases depending on the circumstances
of the case one must always properly choose between harmony and disharmony,
therefore not causing or causing greater than the least possible death and
pain.
However, if this scientific experiment proves to be possible the symbiosis
of whole nature, then it can be assumed, rather, that such a potentially
general good nature is created rather by the sovereign good God, because
the sovereign law of nature would also be the good, or the above symbiosis. The
failure of this experiment would probably definitively refute the possibility
of symbiosis of the whole nature and thus also my Philosophy of Balance.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
, www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 21/05/2013 06: 44:22
Message:
Out of the ten planted potatoes nine sprouted into the
above-ground green bushes. So far my potatoes are not destroyed by Colorado
potato beetles, without any means of intervening against them, according to my
adviser Colorado potato beetles did not discover my flower bed by smell so far,
because it is newly established, it is possible that my potato plants are
protected against Colorado potato beetles by young plants of weeds, against
which I had not to intervene also in any way so far. From weed plants I have
in the potato flower bed according to my adviser young plants of Elytrigia, saltbush, nettles, and one young plant of common
comfrey.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
, www.filosofierovnovahy )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 22/05/2013 17:25:42
Message:
Today I tore out partially the excessively reproduced
weeds.
(see /my/ photos http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.4909932348371.1073741825.1299966627&type=3
)
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 25/05/2013 08:25:45
Message:
Today I rolled up a bit of soil around my potato
plants.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
, www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 05/06/2013 14:27:14
Post:
Yesterday the disaster happened to me at my hens, either I was the cause or I
was either negligent from my ignorance, or I wasn't negligent at all, according
to my Philosophy of Balance but for it as well I take the responsibility. In
addition my neighbors are attacking me because of the smell from my chicken
farm. In my opinion, for this accident and the neighbors attacks the revenge of
the cells of the vermin is behind, i.e. of plant and animal pests, which
were killed by herbicides and pesticides in the cultivation of wheat and dried
alfalfa from standard agriculture, which I give as food in large quantities to
my hens, even though I have recently switched in my case among others on plant
food. Practically only from organic agriculture. The
solution is that I will buy organic grain for 900,-CZK to 2700,-CZK per 100 kg,
organic alfalfa from the SUŠÁRNA POHOŘELICE ltd. and organic maize for
900,-CZK per 100 kg, and I began to grow organic clover grass mixture enclosing
the part of the garden paddock of my hens in fence. Transition to organic
feed of my hens, so it would not be the above extension of the boundaries of my
pack for my dog and my hens and this pack should not be once again of above
parasitic-predatory nature, eg. in
relation to pests of wheat, but this my food chain existed in symbiosis, as
much as possible.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
, www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 08/06/2013 08:22:50
Message:
Feeding animals bio wheat cannot be accepted as a global, general solution,
this is in contradiction with the food especially of the poorer part of
mankind. According to the rule of Philosophy of Balance (A human must never
kill any living creature, especially human (or him- or herself).) I will
feed my hens in particular natural wheat 100 kg for 900, - CZK, which is grown
according to the seller in old-fashioned way allegedly without chemical sprays,
and not certified organic wheat, because I would risk more, that some
people, particularly in developing countries, die of starvation as a result
of the cultivation of the more expensive organic wheat for my hens instead of
the cheap wheat from standard farming.
We don´t hoe my potatoes, because it is in contrary to the principle of
my Philosophy of Balance to kill possible minimum of living creatures,
including weeds, if these weeds do not reproduce excessively and put my
potatoes in danger of life.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
, www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 10/06/2013 15:46:13 corrected 29/09/2013
Post:
quote:
Post of Dalibor
Grůza
... At the same time the third option, that
human cannot live in symbiosis (also elsewhere understood as harmony) with all
of nature and living creatures must always be on the expense of which the
human and his or her chosen and protected pack of living creatures live,
that the human would have to necessarily kill to survive and with which he or
she would necessarily fight on life and death (i.e. partial necessary
parasitism or predation), it would mean that the supposedly sovereign good God,
hence by Him allegedly created nature are very merciless.
In nature there is the question in addition to the
force of the law of exclusive harmony (i.e. symbiosis) or the law of exclusive
disharmony (i.e. parasitic-predatory image of the world) then the force of the law
of prevailing harmony or of the law of prevailing disharmony or no the law of harmony or the law of disharmony prevails
here. Only in the case of the above-mentioned law of exclusive harmony (i.e.
symbiosis) the Philosophy of Balance is not refuted, thus the permanent
duty of everyone to cause the least possible death and pain enforced and
punished by nature itself, in those other cases depending on the circumstances
of the case one must always properly choose between harmony and disharmony,
therefore not causing or causing greater than the least possible death and
pain.
...
Due to my mental health I could not stand to be surely
permanently mortal enemy of any living creature, if the above mentioned law of
the exclusive harmony (ie symbiosis) is not surely
valid in the nature, I could not stand and I would not want to live in such a
world, due to my mental health I would be of it apparently permanently insane
(similarly as the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche went mad from his predatory
morality), I would probably die of it. My Philosophy of Balance is
therefore my fear and my only possible fight for my life.
The law of exclusive harmony (ie symbiosis)
in nature is one of many in my existing experience the most probable while the
most attractive of the above existing options. Unlike me, who had to bet
everything on this option, the others may choose from the above options with
their life bets, they can spread the risk for the more above mentioned
according to them probable options, but because it is also for them the most
attractive option, they are willing to wait long enough, if one proves and
establishes this option, it could come out.
To the objection that in my case it is effeminacy, it may be noted that I defend as much as possible according to my possibilities to participate in the world of unnecessary cruelty (hell) and according to my reason to live in this world of unnecessary cruelty (hell) is possibly for all living creatures ultimately possibly also after their death unbearable suffering. At birth all
children are weak, irrational and sensitive (i.e. symbiotic feminine element)
and they need a loving mom, because women have maternal instinct to the weak
and sensitive. When a woman or man intensifies physically, gains competitive
masculine element, which separates them from mom and enables them to find their
own place in the world, the same is true if the man or woman do not become
physically strong, but they develop a rationality (second competitive masculine
element), which, however, occurs in a child at a later age than the physical strength,
in this case especially boys mature later.
In some ways I could be mistaken, and in some ways I
can be right, Universe,
human, creatures, i.e. love or God are logical, not beyond logical, although it
is a sort of machine, but the machine of God, i.e. perfectly infinitely complex
machine also for humans all accessible only to emotions which are however also
at people imperfect. Imperfect human reason always simplifies and we are not
able to see the end of this perfectly infinitely complex machine, even when
using imperfect human reason the part of this perfect infinite machine
initially perceived mainly by imperfect human emotions as pressures, of which
result the imperfect human reason checked imperfectly (i.e. in models) later,
we can see on principal better than only through imperfect human emotions.
Literature: Jan Poněšický, Fenomén ženství a mužství, Psychologie ženy a muže, rozdíly
a vztahy, Publisher TRITON Ltd., Prague 2004
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
, www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 22/06/2013 17:56:41
Message:
Today I tore out mostly the
excessively reproduced weeds.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 07/07/2013 15:28:27
Message:
Today I harvested a
worse plant of my potatoes from my above symbiotic way of agriculture, from one
planted potato I obtained the harvest of 895 grams of healthy large early
potatoes. But I made the mistake that I did not wait for a green herb of potato
plant to become dry (according
to my father in the early potatoes from now after about a month), so that the
whole plant did not die at harvest, which would prove a real possibility in the
nature of possible maximal symbiosis (i.e. harmony or paradise) of my entire
food chain of me as a human, my dog, my hens (males and females), my potatoes
and their pests, especially Elytrigia and
Colorado potato beetles.
(my) Photos: https://www.facebook.com/dalibor.gruza/media_set?set=a.10200229048911138.1073741826.1299966627&type=3
(see www.spvzt.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 14/07/2013 19:45:48
Message:
Today I tore out circa 6
plants of excessively reproduced weeds.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 18/07/2013 13:10:42
Post:
Today I harvested my
other two plants of my potatoes from my above symbiotic way of agriculture,
from both planted potatoes I obtained the harvest of 2551 grams of healthy
large early potatoes. I waited for a green herb of potato plant to become dry, so that the whole plant did not
die at harvest. The result of this experiment proves a real possibility
in the nature of possible maximal symbiosis (i.e. harmony or paradise) of my
entire food chain of me as a human, my dog, my hens (males and females), my
potatoes and their pests, especially Elytrigia
and Colorado potato beetles, hence of all living creatures.
(my) Photos: https://www.facebook.com/dalibor.gruza/media_set?set=a.10200289137693320.1073741827.1299966627&type=1
(see www.spvzt.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 28/07/2013 16:48:06
Message:
Today I harvested my
other five plants of my potatoes from my above symbiotic way of agriculture,
from five planted potatoes I obtained the harvest of about 6100 grams of
healthy large early potatoes. I waited for a green herb of potato plant to
become dry, so that
the whole plant did not die at harvest. Totally I harvested from my
aforementioned symbiotic way of farming from my 8 grown potato plants from 10
pieces of planted potatoes ca 9.5 kilograms of healthy large early potatoes,
see here and above.
(my) Photos: https://www.facebook.com/dalibor.gruza/photos_albums#!/dalibor.gruza/media_set?set=a.10200343334048195.1073741830.1299966627&type=3
(see www.spvzt.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
3.2
Cultivation of vine http://forum.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1682 : Pěstování rostlin a vědecký důkaz Filos. rovnováhy
author:
Dalibor Grůza
Time: 14/04/2014 09:05:50
Post:
The cultivation of the vine according
to principles of symbiotic agriculture of Philosophy Balance
I decided to cultivate vines according to the
principles of Philosophy of Balance, see above symbiotic agriculture, therefore to
cause the least possible death and pain. My reason for this step is, that nobody continues with my successful experiment of
growing potatoes in this symbiotic agriculture. Another reason is, that I
had to allow the use of herbicide spraying by my neighbor on my vineyard, of which
he is a free of charge tenant,
on the grounds that:
1) Wine allows to reduce
the consumption of meat, because it contains a free glucose, which is also the
end product of the digestion of meat.
2) If the neighbor
had to mow or hoe continuously my vineyard, which is at present the most merciful and the most merciful for feeding herbivores, he would have to give up the care of my vineyard, because he has more vineyards and he could not bear it physically, not
enough of his power, and if he had enough strength, he would have to eat meat
to gain the power for it, while risking poor harvest of wines and the growth in
meat consumption, because for good wine many people of our city come to him.
3) I enabled him
herbicides, even though these herbicides can harm plants and insects, to which they
may cause a severe allergic reaction, see bees, and thus are also harmful to the
birds, which use the sprayed plants as food or to build nests, and they will hate me for by me thus indirectly caused
death and pain, which I have tried to minimize in the way, that neighbor had cut
the grass and I had raked it out of a sprayed area before spraying it by herbicides.
4) As I want, that
also plants of weeds, insects and birds in my field liked me, I will force the
neighbor to use this symbiotic agriculture for my vineyard.
5) Herbicides in
the Czech Republic are mainly based on the active ingredient glyphosate (trade name Roundup ) from the U.S. company
Monsanto, which should not harm insects, animals or humans (see
, http://www.ceskapozice.cz/domov/ekologie/popularni-herbicid-roundup-jako-zdravotni-ohrozeni : FRANCE, Jan Charvát, 2013)
6) Glyphosate can be used throughout the vegetation, but is
most effective just before or at the beginning of flowering, the principle is, that we should destroy weeds, before they create seeds.
(see )
7) On the contrary according to the principle of symbiotic
agriculture according to the Philosophy of Balance it is necessary to educate weeds and other equally evolutionarily perfect pests, that they do
not reproduce excessively in the way, that
their exterminative agents such as herbicides, insecticides can only be used in case of their excessive reproduction,
rather than in the case of glyphosate herbicide
before or at the beginning of flowering, but only when the excessive reproduction
of weeds when plants of vines are threatened and only in the minimum extent necessary to cause
the least possible death and pain and to save the vines.
(see
www.spvzt.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz
, www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
3.3 Beekeeping http://forum.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1682 : Ráj začíná vědeckým pokusem na mé zahradě
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 31/12/2010
21:49:09
Post:
I'm going to keep bees, my father is a beekeeper and he
has about 70-120 bee colonies.
I discussed with him how to keep bees according to the Philosophy
of Balance. According to the Philosophy of Balance it is not correct to eat
greater amount of honey regularly, the honey should be used only when the
disease, if our organism is not capable itself to resist this disease, such as
flu, cold, before we select antibiotics. Honey has a lethal effect on bacteria,
which according to the Philosophy of Balance can be killed only, if the life of
the individual that is feeling more pain than these microorganisms is threatened,
therefore of evolutionarily more perfect individual. It is therefore not
correct according to the Philosophy of Balance to cultivate extremely bees for
the purpose of the large increase in their honey-bringing.
My goal according to my Philosophy of Balance is to
keep my bees with as little as possible human intervention, or all father's bees
after his death to be the most self-sufficient, and it is not concerned in my
case a crucial aspect of their honey-bringing, because I am earning my living not
by beekeeping but by advocacy. I should also hold honey as much as possible for
its consumption by the bees themselves, because it is made from the nectar of plant flowers,
it is not necessary, that a plant dies, because of it, which is necessary in the
production of sugar, by which for
winter the bees are fed after
removal of honey. (see rule of the Philosophy of Balance
to cause the least possible death and pain of living creatures)
In the case of bees the following greatest dangers to
bees are coming into consideration.
1) It is nosema apis, protozoa or a
single-celled organism that is not capable of photosynthesis and it is fed on other
organisms (the so-called heterotrophic organism). Father treats only weak (i.e.
few in number, hereafter also referred to as weak colonies), not strong (i.e.
more multiplied, hereafter also referred to as strong colonies) colonies with medicine,
which kills these protozoa. This is consistent with the Philosophy of Balance,
because the weak colony is threatened with extinction, and death and pain of
killed protozoa of nosema apis
are thus less than the death and pain of dead bees, because protozoa such as
unicellular organisms are evolutionarily much less perfect than insects, i.e.
bees. At the same time it is not probably right to treat nosema
apis the strong colonies, as
well as protozoa - nosema apis
are live (God's) creatures and they have the right to live in symbiosis with
bees. According to Mark Orko Vácha,
a Catholic priest, microbiologist, based on the theory of evolution the
parasite is successful, that does not kill its host.
2) It is American
foulbrood, it is a bacterium, of which spores germinate in the stomach of larvae
of bees and they subsequently release toxic enzymes that are poisoning larvae,
bacterial spores are very resistant and survive for many decades. Adult bees are
resistant to infection. As with Nosema apis I recommend to treat weak
colonies, and even with antibiotics killing American foulbrood bacterium, with that
then the honey of these colonies would not be supplied with customers within certain
period of time. This is so, because the bee larva is more evolutionarily
perfect, therefore it feels much more pain than American foulbrood bacteria. It
is also in contrary to the principle of the Philosophy of Balance (i.e. to cause
the least possible death only in the protection of life and pain of living
creatures) to burn infected colonies, where it is unnecessary killing of bees
treatable with antibiotics. (see http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mor_v%C4%8Del%C3%ADho_plodu )
3) It is varroa, which is caused by
mites belonging to spidery. Spiders have evolved according to the following
literature about 55 million years before insects (see bibliography below, a
diagram from the present time of the German physicist von Weizsäcker),
insects evolved in the Carboniferous. Mites of varroa
are therefore probably evolutionarily just a little less perfect than insects.
Spiders and also mites of varroa feel therefore
probably at their death just a little less pain than insects, thus bees. It is
here however to doubt this theory, it is quite possible, although slightly less
probable, that mites of varroa feel the same or
greater pain at their death, because they are evolutionarily equal or more perfect
than insects, thus bees. According to my father the first attack of varroa is against strong colonies, where they settle on the
back of bees and they are drinking their equivalent of blood the hemolymph, they multiply only at the larvae of bees, which these
mites are able in their greater numbers in the larvae of bees to deform at
birth. Symbiosis of varroa mites and bees could mean according to me the treatment against
the pest of varroa only at strong colonies, not at weak
colonies, because mites of varroa are (God's)
creatures, that are evolutionarily perfect, therefore they feel the pain,
almost like bees. When there is excessive reproduction of varroa,
the bees die and consequently also these mites die. The contribution of the
beekeeper suggests this on http://ovcsvpardubice.blog.cz/0811/vytvoreni-varroa-tolerantnich-vcel : Fascinovaný včelař (OV Pardubice)
, which provides: It is hard to decide whether to keep weak colonies with small
honey yield rather stinging and resilient to varroa. Or strong colonies with good honey yield, which are docile but with necessary
chemical struggle against varroa.
4) It is the excessive
reproduction of bees and their swarming with the worker bees controlled fight
of a few newly hatched mothers or also of old mother for life and death, when
these mothers are killing each other or they are killing still non-hatched
young mothers. The excessive reproduction of bees is caused by strong
reproductive instinct, which is obviously in these colonies genetically
determined based on the experiences of their ancestors with the ruthless living
conditions (apparently like that of humans and other animals).
Option compared with swarming is a silent exchange, where old and young mother - daughter of old
mother survive together in peace, before it is adult, and then old mother dies,
perhaps in a natural non-violent death. Silent exchange performs quality colonies
that are not swarming, it eliminates the need to carry
out continuous artificial exchange of mothers with violent killing of old
mothers. Silent exchange as the ideal state according to the Philosophy of Balance
is probably also determined genetically by a colony, in my opinion due to the merciful
living conditions of their previous generations. So by merciful beekeeping
described above according to the Philosophy balance.
Literature:
- http://ovcsvpardubice.blog.cz/0903/ticha-vymena-vcelich-matek : Fascinovaný včelař (OV Pardubice)
-
Evoluční teorie - věda nebo náboženství?, Ing. Josef Potoček,
GRANO SALIS NETWORK, 2004, http://granosalis.cz/ebooks/evolucniteorie.htm
- According to a Catholic priest, microbiologist Mark Orko Vácha "Úspěšný
parazit NEZABÍJÍ hostitele" (Marek Orko Vacha , Úvod do ekologie, drafted in 2008, published on the Internet February
5, 2009 , quoted 9/11/2010, page 192, see http://www.orko.cz/Biologie%202010/Uvoddoekologie03.ppt )
3.4 Most merciful methods of preserving plant fruits,
especially in the Czech Republic
At present time in the Czech Republic there are three
standard merciful methods of preserving plant fruits, all these methods are
characterized from the point of view of mercy by certain disadvantages, further
I explain also the in Czech Republic most merciful method of preserving plant
fruits, i.e. drying plant fruits in dryers at higher temperatures.
The most commonly used standard merciful method is
preserving plant fruits by so called boiling plant fruits, which consists in immersing
the plant fruits into a glass of water with a large amounts of sugar, which is
used as a preservative and the hermetical closing of the glass by a cap follows
and further follows the cooking of the glass, virtually bigger number of these
glasses in a large pot filled with boiling water within corresponding longer
time, a disadvantage of this method from the point of view of mercy is
especially large amounts of sugar, which is necessary to use as a preservative
against microorganisms, which will penetrate the hermetic closed cap of the
glass or which the above boiling of the glass in the pot failed to kill, because
in the Czech Republic it is necessary for the production of sugar to kill the
whole plant of sugarbeet, because beet sugar is produced from the roots of plant
of the sugar beet.
The second standard merciful method is to freeze the
plant fruits in the freezer, e.g. in the refrigerator, a disadvantage of this
method from the point of view of mercy is the high electric energy consumption
even in the case of small freezer, therefore the freezing of plant fruits is
practically unusable for a human with a high consumption of plant fruits through
the whole year due to costs of electric energy for big freezer sharply
increasing with the bigger size of his or her consumption of preserved plant
fruits e.g. in winter and the consumption of the frozen plant fruits in larger
quantities is also environmentally unfriendly due to the mercilessness of
producing large quantities of electrical energy for this big freezer necessary
for storage of this large quantities of plant fruits through whole year.
In the Czech Republic the third standard merciful
method is drying of plant fruits in electric dryers, because in the Czech
Republic the climate does not enable to dry these plant fruits in the sun in
the open air (in States where it is possible to dry these plant fruits in the
sun in the open air, it is probably the most merciful method of preservation of
plant fruits from every conceivable methods), at present time in my experience the
majority of these electric dryers offered in the Czech market are very
technically imperfect, because due to the fact, that their aim is allegedly to preserve
all the vitamins, the drying in the majority of these electric dryers is
enabled only at relatively low temperatures, therefore it is necessary several
days for successful drying even in such a small electric dryer with large
consumption of electric energy and a successful result is never guaranteed, it
means that this large electric energy consumption is often unnecessary, because
according to my information one does not often succeed in drying the plant fruits
in these electric dryers (e.g. it is not possible to dry apricots in these electric
dryers with achievable only relatively low temperatures anyway, while I am normally
buying apricots from organic, i.e. ecological agriculture imported apparently from
Turkey dried apparently in Turkey in the sun in the open air due to the Turkish
hot climate). The alleged necessity of using relatively low temperatures in these
electric dryers to preserve all vitamins in plant fruits is probably a mistake
of modern exact, i.e. measurable science, virtually fraud, because these vitamins are often acquired as a
kind of juices from cadavers of slaughtered, i.e. often tortured and killed
animals from agricultural slaughter factory farms of animals (see eg. vitamin
D3), according to the Philosophy of Balance such allegedly beneficial vitamins,
under which is hidden a huge often unnecessary death and pain, can help only in
extreme emergency, if there is no other more merciful solution (e.g. the above mentioned
vitamin D3 can be substituted by plant vitamin D2, of which overdosing however
may cause even death, it is in contrast to the above mentioned animal vitamin
D3, of which overdosing is nearly not possible, therefore in the Czech Republic
the vitamin D2 is obtainable only on prescription from a physician in
pharmacies, it is in contrast to vitamin D3, which is freely available in
pharmacies in the Czech Republic), according to my Philosophy of Balance these
vitamins produced from slaughtered animals can help on principle for only short time, surely
such vitamins are not on principle suitable for long term use, when according
to my Philosophy of Balance because of their above mentioned mercilessness
their long-term use must apparently have serious adverse health consequences.
Therefore
in the Czech Republic the most merciful method of preserving plant fruits is
probably below mentioned variant of the above mentioned third standard merciful
method of drying plant fruits in electric dryers. When drying plant fruits it
is apparently necessary to use more powerful electric dryers capable of
achieving higher temperatures, in which the plant fruits is not necesary to dry so long time and it
is surely possible in them at this relatively high temperatures to dry all
kinds of plant fruits (probably also above mentioned apricots), because the aim
of drying of the plant fruits should not be an above mentioned sort of pseudo-scientific
preservation of all vitamins, but a sufficient amount of dried plant fruits to
eat, because in the ultimate goal according to the Philosophy of Balance the
plant fruits has to form one of the main, virtually possibly even absolutely
predominant food component of all living creatures, because the larger amount
of these by living creature eaten in dryers at relatively higher temperature
dried plant fruits is, the larger amounts of merciful vitamins and sugars
originated from these large amounts of plant fruits is also in all food consumed
by such each living creature, so there it is not necessary to solve the
preservation of all vitamins in each piece of in such way dried plant fruits.
Note: I thank my stepmother Mary for her very
important consultation for this article.
For details see: www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
Philosophy
of Balance or ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY as biblical paradise in the world for
all living creatures by our own forces as commentary on Bible, Genesis, chapter
1-4
Genesis 1-4:26
King James Version (KJV)
1
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was
without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the
Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let
there be light: and there was light.
4 And God saw the
light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.
14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.
19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.
21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.
24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
26 And God said, Let us
make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over
the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and
over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27 So God created man in
his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he
them.
28 And God blessed them,
and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and
subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the
air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
29 And God said, Behold,
I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the
earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to
you it shall be for meat.
30 And to every beast of
the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon
the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and
it was so.
31 And God saw every
thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and
the morning were the sixth day.
2
1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host
of them.
2 And on the seventh
day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from
all his work which he had made.
3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.
4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens,
5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.
6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.
7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
8 And the Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.
9 And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
11 The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold;
12 And the gold of that land is good: there is bdellium and the onyx stone.
13 And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia.
14 And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.
15 And the Lord God took the man, and put him
into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying,
Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
17 But of the tree of
the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that
thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
18 And the Lord God said, It is not good that
the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
19 And out of the ground
the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of
the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and
whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
20 And Adam gave names
to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but
for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.
21 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall
upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh
instead thereof;
22 And the rib, which
the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her
unto the man.
23 And Adam said, This
is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman,
because she was taken out of Man.
24 Therefore shall a man
leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall
be one flesh.
25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.
3
1 Now the serpent was more subtil
than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall
not eat of every tree of the garden?
2 And the woman said
unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
3 But of the fruit of
the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat
of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
4 And the serpent said
unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
5 For God doth know
that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be
as gods, knowing good and evil.
6 And when the woman
saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and
a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did
eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
7 And the eyes of them
both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves
together, and made themselves aprons.
8 And they heard the
voice of the Lord God
walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid
themselves from the presence of the Lord God amongst the trees of the garden.
9 And the Lord God called unto
Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?
10 And he said, I heard
thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid
myself.
11 And he said, Who told
thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded
thee that thou shouldest not eat?
12 And the man said, The
woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.
13 And the Lord God said unto the
woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent
beguiled me, and I did eat.
14 And the Lord God said unto the serpent,
Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every
beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat
all the days of thy life:
15 And I will put enmity between thee and the
woman, and between thy seed and her
seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
16 Unto the woman he
said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou
shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he
shall rule over thee.
17 And unto Adam he
said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of
the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed
is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy
life;
18 Thorns also and
thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the
field;
19 In the sweat of thy
face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast
thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.
20 And Adam called his
wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.
21 Unto Adam also and to
his wife did the Lord God
make coats of skins, and
clothed them.
22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is
become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his
hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
23 Therefore the Lord God sent him forth
from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.
4
1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man
from the Lord.
2 And she again bare
his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper (of sheep), but Cain was a tiller of
the ground.
3 And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord.
4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering:
5 But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.
6 And the Lord said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?
7 If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.
8 And Cain talked with
Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.
9 And the Lord said unto Cain,
Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother's keeper?
10 And he said, What
hast thou done? the voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the
ground.
11 And now art thou
cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother's
blood from thy hand;
12 When thou tillest the
ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a
vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.
13 And Cain said unto
the Lord, My
punishment is greater than I can bear.
14 Behold, thou hast
driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be
hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come
to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.
15 And the Lord said unto him,
Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold.
And the Lord set
a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.
16 And Cain went out
from the presence of the Lord,
and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.
17 And Cain knew his
wife;
and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name
of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.
18 And unto Enoch was born Irad: and Irad begat Mehujael: and Mehujael begat Methusael: and Methusael begat Lamech.
19 And Lamech took unto him two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah.
20 And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of such as dwell in tents, and of such as have cattle.
21 And his brother's name was Jubal: he was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ.
22 And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah.
23 And Lamech said unto his wives, Adah and Zillah, Hear my voice; ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech: for I have slain a man to my wounding, and a young man to my hurt.
24 If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold.
25 And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.
26 And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the Lord.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%201:1-4:26&version=KJV