BOOKLET OF THE PARTY FOR THE RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING
CREATURES
(philosophical experiment/manual)
Among other things the award: „The Most Merciful Products“.
My text on the www.spvzt.cz
and on the mentioned webs is licensed under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported, unless stated
specifically otherwise.
4th edition,
Copyleft 2012-2014
We cannot survive without cadavers (elsewhere in my
writings possibly also as without meat) of animals!
We want only the merciful organic meat! (see 7. Interview with Hare
Krishna-an important Hindu organization and Hindus about eating meat and
carnivores )
Slaughter factory farming are animal concentration
camps!
The slaughter tax contributes to the change of factory farming to organic
farming.
The slaughter tax will help people in dire need.
(All quotations from the Bible in this book because of
copyright are on principle in Czech from Kralice Bible see http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~rovnanim/bible/k/1K15.php : Bible of Kralice, Protestant Theological Faculty of Charles University, Prague
, originally all inspired by the Bible Old
and New Testaments | including deuterocanonic books |, Czech ecumenical
translation, CZECH Bible Society, 1995, see www.biblenet.cz , in English from King James Version http://www.biblegateway.com/
)
THE LECTURES ON THE PHILOSOPHY
OF BALANCE
(Lecturer - JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., author of
the work):
1. Individual
lectures through video call via skype on line: daliborgruza , where
appropriate, also with the translation to your language, it is possible to
arrange them GRATIS for at least 5 serious interested present persons + possible
reward for a translator from the Czech language at the contacts
listed below.
2. Topics of lectures are about 60 minutes including discussion:
a) PB in relation to diseases, medicine and experiments on animals,
b) PB and marriage
and children,
c) PB and politics
(especially Nazism, Stalinism, democracy and the future of democracy),
d) PB and ethical
breeding of dogs and cats and agricultural industrial slaughter factory farms,
e) PB and ethics
(in particular, how we should act in every moment of our life, by what we
should be managed),
f) PB and mystique
(in particular from the perspective of contemporary scientific projection of philosophical
pantheism and subjective idealism),
g) PB and physics
(especially from the view of the mechanical model of the reality as the
mechanical movement of the points of spacetime),
h) PB and mathematics
in particular, from the perspective of counting with zero and infinity,
ch) PB and the
slaughter tax and political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures,
i) PB and the
Devil, virtually an absolute vacuum,
j) PB and God (is it
necessary 100% belief in God, or is less belief enough, in what we must believe
in 100%),
k) PB and the army
and physical training,
l) PB and the
possibility of the biblical paradise in our world,
m) PB and
symbiotic agriculture,
n) PB and the law
of karma,
o) PB and unmerciful,
especially animal products,
p) PB and psychology
(in particular the law of balance, both long term and in casual conversation,
at which we feel well as much as possible),
q) PB and
aesthetics (in particular perfectly infinitely complex beauty),
r) PB and "an
impossibility" of vegetarianism in particular from the perspective of
Hinduism,
q) PB and law (in
particular, the social contract of all living creatures and the
"good" attorney at law),
t) PB and Judaism
and Islam,
u) PB and
Christianity,
v) PB and economics
(especially the burning of cadavers, virtually of organic matter and the law of
success),
w) PB and
Darwinism (Darwin's struggle for life in the nature throughout the food chain
as the worst possible solution),
x) PB and language
or on any specific topic, which is the subject of the Philosophy of Balance.
Contacts:
Tel. 00420 534 008 871 , Tel. 00420 606 302 812, skype online: daliborgruza , e-mai: zakladatel@spvzt.cz
Content
Introduction … 2
The
lectures on the Philosophy of Balance … 3
Political
Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures … 5
About us … 6
The Statute of SPVŽT and Articles of
civil association Society of Friends … 8
Books: Philosophy
of Balance … 21
Secondary School Philosophy of
Balance … 24
Symbiotic
agriculture and experiments of natural science proving Philosophy of Balance
… 25
Discussion on the political
orientation of SPVŽT … 27
1. Position of Philosophy of
Balance on Judeo-Christian morality of today’s democratic society … 27
2. And
unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer the other … 28
3. How are different and how are the same Nazism and
Philosophy of Balance …
29
4. Position of Philosophy of Balance on Nazism and
Stalinism …
31
5. Discussion with some members of my former Green
Party … 32
6. Why are agricultural
slaughter factory farms today's concentration camps of animals … 32
8. Merciful diet of woman –
mother and child during pregnancy and breastfeeding … 36
10. The legal rights of viruses, bacteria and
parasites in general, by SPVŽT … 43
11. Good adviser, or solicitor and his or her client
… 44
12. The
question of Judaism from the viewpoint of Philosophy of Balance … 44
13.
Romany politics according to the Philosophy of Balance … 46
14.
Educational politics according to the Philosophy of Balance … 48
15.
Collective responsibility and vaccination against viruses … 48
16. Whom
did I vote in the parliamentary elections in October 2013 … 50
17. Why to
participate in, virtually not to avoid politics! … 53
18.
Differences and sameness in objective value of all living creatures
… 54
19.
Position of Philosophy of Balance on racism … 54
20. Whom
would I vote in municipal elections in Hustopeče 2014 … 55
PETTION for the adoption of the
draft of the LAW ON THE SLAUGHTER TAX … 56
1. Draft of Act on the slaughter tax … 56
2. Links to the text
… 65
3. The
explanatory memorandum to the draft on the slaughter tax … 66
4. Interview: Meat tax-utopia or solution? … 68
5. Interview II.
Meat tax-utopia or solution? … 70
6. Interview: Meat tax - change of name to the slaughter tax … 72
7.
Vegetarian.cz presents … 73
PETITION NECESSARY FOR THE
FORMATION OF THE POLIT. PARTY … 74
Gain GRATIS trade design
of rightness:“THE MOST MERCIFUL PRODUCTS” … 76
1. The award-won most merciful
products-a list: … 76
1.3
Potatoes from symbiotic agriculture … 78
2. The statute of the association – introduction … 78
3.
The statute of the association – rules for wining award of the most
merciful products … 79
Contact (T. G. Masaryk’s
house) … 81
Useful links … 82
English corrected translation
and best in Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox multilingual mechanical
translations from English on http://www.spvzt.cz/SPVZTbooklet.html
or http://spvzt.sweb.cz/SPVZTbooklet.html
About newly being
established new political
PARTY FOR
THE RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING CREATURES
(SPVŽT)
Founder: JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.
PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE
PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF
VICTORIOUS ARMY:
„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a
world, where everyone likes each other,
therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least
possible death and pain."
All the rest
consists more in views (speculations).
www.spvzt.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz
( http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/default.asp
, www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
, http://youtu.be/YhOv47fQlRU : My film in Czech language: Zahájí radikální
muslimové brzy atomovou válku? Je evoluce
přírody milosrdná?
Porážková daň. , http://youtu.be/ibV-Fwh4sUc : My film in English with multilingual subtitles: Will radical Muslims soon start atomic war? Is nature's evolution merciful? Slaughter tax.
, www.e-polis.cz
)
My text on
the www.spvzt.cz
and on the above mentioned webs is licensed under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported, unless stated
specifically otherwise.
SPVŽT has a program to create
a humanistic society on principles of mercy and justice just for all living
creatures, in particular of our State regardless of species.
The first objective of SPVŽT
is to promote the Act on the slaughter tax. The aim of the Bill is to tax and thus limit needless slaughters of
animals and, by implication, the suffering of animals caused by the slaughters.
The problem is that, on principle, these animals are slaughtered at a very
young age, after having experienced fattening solely for the purposes of the
slaughter, often under very merciless conditions. The Slaughter Tax Bill
supposes the exclusion of this slaughter tax for health, welfare and other
reasons. Details are modified
in this bill proposal, including the rules for using the revenue raised by this
tax to support farmers in their transition to a different – more merciful
method of agricultural production. Furthermore, the Bill supposes, that these
financial means will be used for public welfare projects, so that the money
raised from death is simply used for saving life. There are two great risks
involved in this Slaughter Tax Bill from the point of view of the
above-mentioned evolutionary hypothesis on the friendship and animosity of
microorganisms. First, the slaughter tax rate might be set too high, resulting
in the forced reduction of the number of kept farm animals. Second, the
slaughter tax rate might be set too low, failing to provide sufficient
encouragement and consideration to the gradual transition of all living
creatures to an increasingly merciful method of nourishment and therefore life
as such, as argued by the present hypothesis on the mercy of nature’s
evolution. One of the solutions to these risks is the fact, that animals not
killed intentionally by a human, i.e. those that died exclusively of old age,
will not be subject to taxation within the Slaughter Tax Bill. Such dead
animals could, under medical supervision and in compliance with valid animal
cruelty laws, be produced by large-scale agricultural production. They would be
used as food for carnivorous animals kept by humans or for those humans who
cannot do without meat and have chosen this type of food for ethical reasons.
This Bill will help balance the interests of carnivores and herbivores, without
forcing a total transition to vegetarian food on the carnivores, something,
that most of them would probably not survive in a good health.
The practical functioning of
the slaughter tax will be based on the finances. At least half of the revenue
of the slaughter tax, will be by this Act specifically intended to subsidies to
farmers and to the transition and to maintain their agricultural production on
animal breeding until their natural death, for the production of the products
from bodies of naturally dead animals, including food, in particular meat. The
following products from naturally dead animals will continue to benefit from
the fact that they will not be the subject of the slaughter tax, compared to
products from slaughtered animals. The moral aspect will also work as the
prevention of reduction of the slaughter tax, because payment of the slaughter
tax will be so a sort of indulgence of the people, that they are complicit with
intentional killing of an animal.
THE SLAUGHTER TAX IS
DRASTICALLY PENALISING THE AGRICULTURAL FACTORY FARMS FOR SLAUGHTER OF
LIVESTOCK-TODAY'S CONCENTRATION CAMPS CAUSING THE WORST SUFFERING OF ANIMALS AS
OPPOSED TO THE FAMILY HOME ANIMAL AND THE ECOLOGICAL ANIMAL BREEDS ALSO FOR THE
PURPOSE OF SLAUGHTER AND TO HELP PEOPLE IN EXTREME NEED IN OUR COUNTRY AND IN
THE WORLD.
Among other things, one tenth
rate of the slaughter tax for goods from organic farms, because they are more
merciful, and further exclusion, where appropriate, or exemption from slaughter
tax of the family home breeds of livestock also for the purpose of slaughter of
133 kilograms of body weight of the animal for a member of the household and a year,
because those members of home breeds have towards bred animals fundamentally
personal relationship on the basis of personal care for farm animals as family
members, as opposed to the agricultural factory farms of animals for the
purpose of slaughter, causing the worst suffering of the animals.
The same tax rate for organic farming and livestock delivered to the home
family farms has to prioritize the education of these farm animals from the
baby, when at the time of taxation at the time of the supply of this animal to
the home breed this animal has a minimum mass than an adult animal.
At least half of the revenue of the slaughter tax will be also by the Act on
the slaughter tax tied purposely for subsidies to organic agricultural also
slaughter breeds. The second most half of the tax will be also by the Act on
the slaughter tax tied purposely to help people in extreme need in our country
and in the world.
The ultimate aim of the
activity of the political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures is the
establishment of peace among all living creatures, inter alia between
carnivores and herbivores, herbivores and plants. to achieve the ideal of
paradise, in a world by their own power of the people and all living creatures in their life.
This goal represents the task reachable only with the progress of science, or
with the continuing evolution of nature in an endless time, and inter alia it will
eventually require a ban on any intentional killing of all animals, especially
animals and plants and fungi by any person for the purpose of consumption and
the consumption only of the bodies of living creatures, in particular animals
deceased at this ban, in principle, only of old age.
The Statute of the political party
THE PARTY FOR THE RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING CREATURES
“politics should be reasonable and moral” ... “The law of love applies
to society and State as much as to the family. All reasonable and honest
politics are the implementation of humanism inside and outside.”
Tomáš
Garrigue Masaryk, the first Czechoslovak president
ČAPEK, Karel. Talks with
T. G. Masaryk. 1. Summary
publication. Prague: Československý spisovatel, 1990. 592 pages. Writings,
volume 20.
Abbreviation: SPVŽT
Title I.
General
provisions
1. The Party
for the Rights of All living Creatures is a political party in accordance with
the Act on Association in political parties and movements no. 424/91 Collection,
as amended. It uses the abbreviation SPVŽT.
2. The SPVŽT
carries out its activities throughout the territory of the Czech Republic.
3. The seat
of the headquarters is Hustopeče, Dobrovského 56/7 (House not far from the
central square, in which the first Czechoslovak President T.G. Masaryk lived in
the years 1861-1863).
4. The SPVŽT program is to
create a humanistic society on principles of mercy and justice for all living
creatures, in particular of our State regardless of species.
5. The first objective of
SPVŽT is to promote the Act on slaughter tax. The aim of
the Bill is to tax and thus limit needless slaughters of animals and, by
implication, the suffering of animals caused by the slaughters. The problem is
that, on principle, these animals are slaughtered at a very young age, after
having experienced fattening solely for the purposes of the slaughter, often
under very merciless conditions. The Slaughter Tax Bill supposes the exclusion
of this slaughter, tax for health, welfare and other reasons. Details are modified
in this bill proposal, including the rules for using the revenue raised by this
tax to support farmers in their transition to a different – more merciful
method of agricultural production. Furthermore, the Bill supposes, that these
financial means will be used for public welfare projects, so that the money
raised from death is simply used for saving life. There are two great risks
involved in this Slaughter Tax Bill from the point of view of the
above-mentioned evolutionary hypothesis on the friendship and animosity of
microorganisms. First, the slaughter tax rate might be set too high, resulting
in the forced reduction of the number of kept farm animals. Second, the
slaughter tax rate might be set too low, failing to provide sufficient
encouragement and consideration to the gradual transition of all living
creatures to an increasingly merciful method of nourishment and therefore life
as such, as argued by the present hypothesis on the mercy of nature’s
evolution. One of the solutions to these risks is the fact, that animals not
killed intentionally by a human, i.e. those that died exclusively of old age,
will not be subject to taxation within the Slaughter Tax Bill. Such dead
animals could, under medical supervision and in compliance with valid animal
cruelty laws, be produced by large-scale agricultural production. They would be
used as food for carnivorous animals kept by humans or for those humans who
cannot do without meat and have chosen this type of food for ethical reasons.
This Bill will help balance the interests of carnivores and herbivores, without
forcing a total transition to vegetarian food on the carnivores, something,
that most of them would probably not survive in a good health.
6. In deciding on its affairs
SPVŽT is governed at all levels by the Democratic majority principle. The
resolution becomes valid:
(a) in the
presence of the over - half number of
Members of Republic Congress, of the Republic Convention, the Regional Organization,
the Republic Conciliation and Arbitration Commission, the Revision Commission,
and for it an absolute majority of votes of the present members, except for the
below mentioned decisions of the Congress,
(b) for it
an absolute majority of the present members shall vote.
(c) in the
presence of the over - half number of democratically elected members of the
Congress, and for it the votes of at least the three-fifth majority of the present
members at the cancellation of the decision of the Honorary Chairman of the
SPVŽT about the dissolution of SPVŽT,
(d) in the
presence of the over - half number of democratically elected members of the
Congress, and for it the votes of at least three-fifth the majority of the present
members at the change, including the removal or replacement of this Statute,
(e) in the
presence of the over - half number of democratically elected members of the
Congress, and for it at least a two-thirds majority votes of the present members
for the election and dismissal of the Honorary President of the SPVŽT.
7. The elections
on the various levels of SPVŽT are subject to approved electoral regulations of
the competent authority.
8. In
pursuing the program SPVŽT collaborates with other subjects with the close
program, and that in the field of internal and Foreign Affairs.
Title II.
Membership
A member of
the SPVŽT can be any citizen of the Czech Republic over 18 years, regardless of
nationality, race and religion, and he or she confirms with his or her signature
on the Member application form that he or she agrees with the program and
Statute of SPVŽT.
1.
Membership shall be on the date of the decision of the Local Organization (MO),
Regional Council (KR) or of the Convention (RS).
2. In the
case of rejection of membership in the SPVŽT MO must include the reason for the
refusal. The citizen has the right to appeal in writing to the nearest higher
authority within 30 days after receiving of the decision.
3.
Membership shall lapse:
(a) resignation
of a member on the basis of performance of written notification,
(b) the
abolition of the membership for harming the interests of SPVŽT and dishonest
conduct,
(c) non - payment
of contributions for a period of one year,
(e) death,
(f) to discontinue
the membership in SPVŽT is possible at the request of a member, if there are
compelling reasons to do so.
Title III.
The rights
and obligations of members
All party
members have the same rights and obligations regardless of race, religion, age,
or gender.
1. The
Member shall have the right:
(a) to be
informed about what is happening inside the SPVŽT,
(b) to
participate in the negotiations of the member meetings and to joint activities,
of which he or she is a member of,
(c) to express
freely an opinion on the work of all the bodies and officials of the SPVŽT,
(d) to
submit suggestions, questions, or complaints to the authorities of the SPVŽT on
which the competent authority is obliged to reply in writing within 30 days,
(e) to vote,
elect, propose and be elected to functions within the SPVŽT and to be proposed as
the candidate for the representative and legislative bodies,
(f) to
appeal against the decision to a higher party authority – appeal must be in
writing,
(g) to
participate in the meetings of any of the authority of the SPVŽT, which relates
to his or her person (the written invitation).
2. The
Member is obliged to:
(a) to
follow the program, Statute and other party documents in his or her action,
(b) to apply
the politics of SPVŽT,
(c) to
perform the obligations arising from membership and functions in SPVŽT,
(d) to pay
proper fees of at least 100,- CZK annually, with the option of paying
quarterly, semi-annually or annually.
3.
Disciplinary measures:
According to
the gravity of the facts can be made:
(a)
admonition,
(b) the
revocation of the function – by the competent or superior authority,
(c) SPVŽT-membership
cancellation by the authority which received the Member, or a superior
authority,
(d)
suspension of membership.
Member has
the right to appeal within 15 days of the delivery to the nearest higher
authority which must respond within 30 days.
Title IV.
The
organizational structure of the SPVŽT
1. The
President and Executive Vice-President are the statutory representatives of the
SPVŽT.
2. The
highest decision-making authority of the party is the Republic Congress of
SPVŽT.
3. The
highest decision-making authority of the party between congresses is the
Republic Convention (RS).
4. The
executive body of the Republic Convention is Executive Committee (VV).
5. The
Chairman of the VV is the President of the party.
6. The Republic
Congress elects Republic Revision Commission (RRK) and Republic Conciliation
and Arbitration Commission (hereinafter referred to as RSRK).
7. In places
where MO are not established, appointees to support election campaigns can
arise from the ranks of supporters of party.
8. Honorary
President
Title V.
Local
organization
1. Basic
organizational unit of SPVŽT is a local organization (hereinafter referred to
as MO), which is made up of the voluntary decision of the members.
2. MO has
its registered office in the municipality or city where its members live. If
necessary, and in the case of the frequency the citizens of the more localities
may be brought together into one.
3. MO may be
formed if at least 3 members of the constituting meeting decide. MO is formed
from the date of the constituent meeting after the approval of the Regional
Council.
4. MO is
controlled by its Committee, which is elected by the constituent or the annual
meeting usually for a period of two years.
5. MO is
leading a proper account of its members and member contributions.
6. MO shall
elect and dismiss officials at the local level.
7. The
Committee is generally a three-man in the positions: Chairman, Secretary,
Treasurer.
8. Member
meetings are held as needed at least four times a year. Once a year, the annual
meeting of members is held.
9. Meetings
shall be convened by the Chairman in accordance with the action plans, or from
another urgent reason, if so requested by at least 1/3 of the members. Meetings
may also be convened by the higher party authority.
10. MO shall
have the right to propose, where appropriate, to elect its members in all the
work of the institutions of SPVŽT. This right also applies to candidates for
the members of the representative and legislative bodies.
11. Assigned
financial and material resources are managed in accordance with applicable
regulations.
12. MO shall
cease, if the number of members falls below 3, or from a decision of a higher
authority.
Title VI.
Regional
organization
1. Regional
Organization consists of all of the local organizations of the SPVŽT in the
region.
2. The
highest authority of the regional organization is the Regional Conference, it shall
meet at least once a year.
3. The
Regional Council (KR) is the body elected by the Regional Conference on the
territorial principle.
4. The Regional
Council is elected by representatives of the MO, and according to the electoral
code adopted by the Regional Conference.
5. KR elects
Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Secretary, and at least 2 members of the Regional
Council.
6. KR is
responsible for development of membership, the promotion of SPVŽT and the fulfillment
of the objectives of the program of the party.
7. KR draws
up the list of the Self-governing bodies of which scope coincides with
territorial responsibility.
8. It actively participates in electoral activity,
which concerns its scope in a given territorial unit, and it is responsible for
obtained results.
9. With
regard to the proceedings in the framework of the SPVŽT KR is subordinated to
RS of SPVŽT.
10. In one
area there can only be one KR.
Title VII.
The Republic
Congress
1. Republic
Congress (Congress) convened by the Republic Convention once every two years.
Convene an extraordinary Congress the President of the RS is obliged, or if
said for at least 3/5 of its members, or 2/3 of the Regional Councils or 1/3 of
each region.
2. Delegates
of the Congress shall be elected at the regional conference according to the in
advance given key.
3. Congress
shall decide on all political and major issues and has the following powers:
(a)
approving the report of the President, a report on the economy, the report of
the RRK and RSRK and measures
(b) to approve
the constituting documents, i.e. the Program, Statute, and other insignia,
(c) shall
elect the President of SPVŽT, Executive Vice-President, Republic Convention, Republic
Revision Commission, Republic Arbitration and conciliation Commission, as a
rule, on a two-year term, Honorary President of the SPVŽT always on life period
(d) to
decide on the withdrawal of the party and property settlement
(e) to
dismiss the President, the Executive Vice-President, the Republic Convention
and the Commissions.
f) Congress
has the right to change the Statute.
Title VIII.
Republic
Convention of SPVŽT
The highest
authority between meetings of Republic Congress is the Republic Convention
(hereinafter referred to as RS).
1. Republic
Convention manages the activity of the party, shall be responsible for the
implementation of the objectives of the program, the documents adopted by
Congress, creates the concept and delivers opinions of SPVŽT.
2. The
members of Republic Convention and their alternates are elected by Congress. In
the case of non - compliance with their obligations they may be removed from a
post on the proposal of the Republic Convention or KR. About their appeal RS decides
definitively.
3. The
number of members of the RS is given by the number of Regional Organizations. A
maximum of one member per region, there is no requirement that it must be the Chairman
of KR.
4. The Republic
Convention shall elect three Vice-Chairmen. It shall appoint from its members
press spokesman, and organizing Secretary.
5. RS
decides on proposals on candidates for legislatures.
6. It confirms
the list into the representative councils of higher territorial units.
7. It approves
the budget of the party.
Title IX.
The
Executive Committee of the Republic Convention
1. The
Executive Committee of the Convention (VVS) is made up of the President,
Executive Vice-President and Vice-Presidents elected by RS. It performs tasks
arising from resolutions of the RS.
2. VVS
performs tasks of RS in the period between its meetings and it is responsible to
the RS. It draws up documents and opinions on the issues, of which decisions are
the responsibility of the RS.
3. Regularly
convened by the President of the VVS or Executive Vice Chairman.
4. To
proceed the activities and to perform the tasks a secretariat is available to
VVS if possible.
Title X.
Officials
1. A member may acquire a function only by election with the
exception of the first Honorary President. The condition of creation and
performance of any function in the framework of the SPVŽT and of the function
of candidate and of the function of a member of the representative and
legislative bodies is the membership in the civil association - Society of
Friends. The termination of membership in SPVŽT occurs without further with a
member who will not give up his or her own in this paragraph mentioned
function, although his or her membership in the civil association - Society of
Friends terminated without further, because he or she substantially breaks the
eternal duty of its members, within one month from this termination. The
Republic Convention resolution with appeal to Congress till 15 days from delivery
of this resolution can declare this termination of membership in SPVŽT with
binding effect. Till 1 month from this resolution of Congress each member of
SPVŽT can demand the final declaratory court judgment well by the action at
law, that the membership in SPVŽT terminated or did not terminate as in this
manner.
2. Election
of the President, Executive Vice-President, three Vice-Presidents, the Chairman
of the RRK and RSRK, Chairmen of KR is made by public or secret vote.
3. For the
performance of the function the reward may be granted to working officials. The
amount of remuneration shall be approved by RS.
5. The
elected officials are responsible for their activities to the authority by which
they were elected to the function.
6. Officials
are bound by the basic fillings of the functions, which are elaborated in the
working rules.
7. As a
rule, they are elected for two years.
Title XI.
Republic
Revision Commission
1. Republic
Revision Commission (RRK) is a body of SPVŽT for
checking compliance with the documents approved by the Congress and for the
control of financial management of SPVŽT. It works according to its plan,
approved by the RS.
2. Congress
shall elect to the RRK 3 members in the cast: the Chairman and two members.
3. RRK has
the right to re-examine the financial management of regional councils or other
bodies including RS SPVŽT.
4. In the
checking of financial management the member chosen for this Region may not take
part in such checks.
5. RRK is
obliged to acquaint the controlled authority and RS with the results of the review. Report on
its activities serves to Congress.
6. The
activities of the RRK are governed by the Statute of the RRK approved by
Congress.
7. RRK
governs methodically working RK of lower degrees.
8. A member of
RRK shall not perform its functions in other elected bodies of the SPVŽT.
Title XII.
Republic Conciliation
and Arbitration Commission
1. The Conciliation
and Arbitration Commission resolves disputes within the party.
2. The
Commission has 3 members, it is elected in the composition Chairman and two members
by the Congress.
3. The
function of the Member of the Commission cannot be associated with functions in
the governing body of any degree.
4. The
conclusions of solutions the Chairman of the Commission presents to the RS and
illustrates by the Protocol.
Title XIII.
Honorary President
1. The
membership of the Honorary President of the SPVŽT cannot lapse otherwise than
by the demise of the SPVŽT.
2. The
Honorary President of the SPVŽT has the right to decide on the dissolution of
the SPVŽT, only the nearest Congress can cancel his or her published decisions
(in particular, see Title I, section 6. of these Statute), at the latest before
the expiry of one year after its publication, this decision shall take effect
on the expiry of one year after its publication, without further, even if this decision of Honorary President about the dissolution of the SPVŽT is invalid or otherwise defective.
3. When the published decision of the Honorary President about the dissolution of the SPVŽT regardless of the validity the
suspension of activities of SPVŽT and SPVŽT can only do acts aimed at the
removal of the condition, which was the reason for this decision of the
Honorary President about the dissolution of the SPVŽT, and the maximum time before the expiry
of one year from the date of this decision of the Honorary President.
4. The Honorary President of the SPVŽT has the right to attend all meetings of all
other SPVŽT organs, to participate in the discussion here, to submit comments
and suggestions of the decisions of these authorities here, however, does not
have the right to vote here.
5. Honorary President
is elected for life, but he or she can only be revoked by the Congress from a
function (in particular, see Title I, section 6 of these Statute). In addition,
the Honorary President of the SPVŽT may also resign.
6. Honorary President
function is incompatible with any other functions in the framework of the SPVŽT
and with the function of a member of the representative and legislative bodies,
at the time of the adoption of the function or on the performance of any
function, with the exception of his or her demise, in the other institutions,
any bodies of the SPVŽT, municipality, County or State or supranational international
organization by the Honorary President a Honorary President function terminates
without further.
7. When the
effectiveness of the above resignation of Honorary President from Office, the
effectiveness of the above removal of the Honorary President from the function
or effectiveness of the above extinction of the function of a Honorary President,
or when his or her death SPVŽT is required to elect a new Honorary President (in
particular, see Title I, section 6 of these Statute) to the time before the
expiry of one year from the death or the effectiveness of the resignation or
the effectiveness of the remove or effectiveness of this extinction or SPVŽT deleted
without further uniformly definitively and the ultimate effect by the expiry of
one year from the death or the effectiveness of the resignation or the
effectiveness of the remove or effectiveness of this extinction.
8. The first
Honorary President is JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D, born 29.1.1973, permanent
residence Mírová 41098/4, 69301 Hustopece.
Title XIV
Principles
of management
1. The
assets of the SPVŽT are made up of financial and material resources obtained
from voluntary donations, membership fees, or success in the elections State
contributions.
2. All
assets are used to support the activities of the SPVŽT in the sense of
fulfilling their electoral program.
3. Costs and
expenses represent mainly costs for the rental of offices, energy charges,
equipment, office equipment, postage, phones, and other operating costs.
4. Officials
and personnel of the SPVŽT shall be entitled to reimbursement of travel costs
and the agreed remuneration.
5. Organizations
and bodies act in relations within the competences laid down in the range of
the following principles and bear full responsibility for their application.
6.
Permission to withdraw funds and to handle the financial resources the
President, Executive Vice-President and Vice-President responsible for the
management of SPVŽT have.
7. The
activities of the SPVŽT in the economic issues are governed by the
Vice-President for the management in accordance with the economic legislation.
8. The draft
of the annual budget shall be drawn up by the Executive Committee and approved
by the Executive Committee of the RS. Proposal for a global budget is approved
by Congress.
9. If the
dissolution of the SPVŽT without legal successor, the balance of the party
holding will be converted to a charity of the same or a similar program like
SPVŽT.
Title XIV.
Common final
provisions
1. The
statutory representatives of the SPVŽT are the President and Executive
Vice-President.
2. At the
level of the KR, the Chairman or Deputy Chairman has the authority to sign. At the
level of the MO it is the Chairman.
3. The
members of all the institutions and organizations are bound by confidentiality
of information concerning the facts, if the hearing was declared closed or
confidential.
4. After the
cancellation of the MO its members may go to other active MO with the consent
of KR.
5. The
number of delegates of the Regional Conference shall be established according
to the given key. The same procedures are for the election of the delegates to
the Congress. The key for the election shall be determined by RS.
6. The
Congress shall decide on the dissolution of SPVŽT with the exception of the
aforementioned decision of the Honorary President about the dissolution of the
SPVŽT, Congress also decides on the disposal of assets in accordance with valid
regulations.
7. All
decisions taken after the approval of this Statute by any authority of the
SPVŽT, which are in violation with this Statute, are invalid.
In
Hustopeče, day..................
Note: the Statute is changed Statute
of the far-right Workers Party of Social Justice as a symbol of the possibility
of changing the extreme non - humanism to extreme humanism even in our society.
Articles of Civil Association
Society of
Friends
(for those interested to become founding members,
please e-mail: ak-gruza@seznam.cz )
Articles of Civil Association - Society
of Friends
Established:
.................................................. ..........................
Preamble:
The main object of the civil
association Society of Friends (further also association) is to achieve the
harmony of everyone and of all things, that means, all the living creatures
(each animal, insect, plant, fungus, living cell, bacteria, virus, machine conscious
of itself, etc.) could in future (evolutionarily) become friends for life and
death.
Article I.
Eternal duty of all living creatures
(1) Fundamental duty of all
living creatures is to cause the least possible death and pain. The perfect
living creature eats then only plant fruits and plant seeds from all living creatures. (Further also eternal duty of
members).
2) Any change of this
eternal duty of all living creatures, who are members of this association
(further also members), is inadmissible. In the event of any change or
nullification of this eternal duty of members the extinction of association
occurs automatically.
(3) By the interpretation of
these articles it is impossible to entitle any elimination or threat of this
eternal duty of members.
(4) Member has right also to eat only gradually in extreme emergency
(especially from serious health reasons) eggs, in extreme emergency carrions of
living creatures died of natural causes, on principle of old age, or in extreme
emergency collected blood of non-slaughtered animals and humans and milk, or in
extreme emergency plants, all always the most mercifully as possible bred and
killed, and products purely from them.
Article II.
Membership in association
(1) A member can become each
living creature, who in face of the association and its members binds always to
keep the eternal duty of members and at the same time he or she binds to keep
the valid Articles of the Association.
(2) The extinction of a
membership in the association happens as well automatically in case of the
member, who substantially breaks the eternal duty of members. The general
meeting resolution can declare this extinction with binding effect. Till 1
month from this resolution each member, also excluded member, can demand the
final declaratory court judgment well by the action at law, that the membership
in association terminated or did not terminate as in this manner.
(3) A member excluded from
the association according to these Articles can become repeatedly the member of
the association earliest after lapse of time 3 months from his or her
exclusion, a member, whose membership in the association became extinct
according to these Articles for the substantial violation of the eternal duty
of members, can become repeatedly the member earliest after lapse of time 5
years from the final resolution about this extinction of his or her membership.
(4) Each member is in
capacity at any time by the unilateral legal act to leave the association.
(5) All the members are obliged always to act to each other conformable with good morals, especially by all the approachable means to defend life of every member against his or her loss or serious affect the health (e.g. hunger, thirst, cold, flaming, by lack of the health care, etc.), this duty is to judge especially with reference to the lasting observance of the eternal duty of members.
Article III.
General meeting
(1) The general meeting
(further only general meeting) decides about all matters of the association
with the absolute majority of voting members. Each member has at the general
meeting one vote. Announcement of an object act, place and time of proceedings
of the general meeting must be published with a sufficient timing-advance
on web pages of the association.
(2) Members can make above-mentioned
decisions also outside the general meeting (e.g. by means of e-mail, especially
by means of the electronic signature of the qualified certificated
authorities). The member, who at the general meeting explicitly or tacitly
abstains voting, is supposed to vote against proposed decision.
Article. IV.
Agents
(1) Two agents always act on
the outside on behalf of the association, the legal acts on behalf of the
association both agents are entitled to do so only together.
(2) The general meeting
chooses and removes agents among members. An agent is in capacity to resign
from his or her function by the unilateral legal act. The function of an agent
extincts as well with the extinction of his or her membership in the
association. After the extinction of his or her function is the former agent
obliged to do all acts, so as the association and its members do not suffer on
their laws or appropriate interests any prejudice.
(3) The agent is obligated at any time in due form to inform any member on his or her request about matters of the association. Both agents decide together about all other things of the association, that before the general meeting has not been reserved or has not been decided.
Article. V.
Possession of association
(1) The association is financed
especially from gifts of its members.
Article VI.
Extinction of association
(1) After the dissolution of
the association the remaining assets from the realization of all estates and
after satisfaction of all creditors of the association divide among actual and
former members and their heirs according to quota of estates, which they give
to the association.
Film: "The Philosophy of Balance and the
slaughter tax. Is nature’s evolution merciful?"(with expert
opinions)
|
http://youtu.be/YhOv47fQlRU : Zahájí radikální
muslimové brzy atomovou válku? Je evoluce
přírody milosrdná?
Porážková daň.
|
http://youtu.be/ibV-Fwh4sUc : Will radical Muslims soon start atomic war? Is nature's evolution merciful? Slaughter tax.
|
If one succeeds in accomplishing at least one case of
friendship of two separate viruses or bacteria or living cells that would
otherwise devour each other, then, in my opinion, the current concept of
Darwin’s theory will be partly refuted and it will be possible to add to it my
hypothesis on the mercy of nature’s evolution, or more precisely, the ability
of all microorganisms to recognize and remember a friend or enemy in other
microorganisms.
The purpose of this experiment is partly to refute
Darwin's theory of evolution. I intend to prove that the foundations of human
morality already exist at the microbial level, implying that religion, for instance,
is not the opium of people, i.e. some sort of artificial creation, but that its
foundations are already encoded in the natural basis, i.e. in our
microorganisms. Thus, in the case of the food chain, there are always two choices,
either the struggle for life or symbiosis, already at the microbial level. This
means that the struggle for life in nature is not inevitable, that already at
the microbial level even in the case of microorganisms which normally devour
each other there exists in a majority of all instances a choice between the
Darwinian struggle for life and symbiosis, where the Darwinian struggle for
life is always the worst option. In the above-mentioned sense, Darwin's theory
as an inevitable struggle for life in the food chain in nature would be refuted
by means of this experiment. This general moral behavior towards all living
organisms does not then represent morality for morality's sake, but morality
for the purpose of symbiosis, which brings the greatest possible benefits to
all involved, whether at the level of microorganisms or at the human level.
This film is licensed under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
.
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.
The book was purchased for
production costs by: The North Bohemian Research Library (Ustí nad
Labem), Study and Research Library of the Pilsen Region (Pilsen),
Moravian-Silesian Research Library in Ostrava, Study and Research Library in
Hradec Králové, The Central Bohemian Research Library in Kladno.
This book is licensed
under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
http://www.spvzt.cz/FilosofieRovnovahyKniha.htm
(book in Czech in the format: html
, pdf , doc , cover in the format html , pdf , doc )
http://www.spvzt.cz/BalancePhilosophyBook.htm
(
book in English in the format: html
, pdf , doc , cover in the format: html
, pdf , doc )
PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:
„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a
world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still
obliged to cause the least possible death and pain."
All the rest consists more in views (speculations).
(I.e. the maximum compliance of good and evil
individuals, virtually good and evil)
In terms of Rational Mystique of paradise of my
Philosophy of Balance it is possible, that, if I have a descendant with my
current partner as a single human before death, whose brain, virtually body
embody the entire Universe, through the birth of our child as the second human
before death in the Universe, whose brain, virtually body will embody the same
Universe, so there is roughly a doubling amount of living cells which will thus
embody the Universe, and thus increase of level difference of its energy,
virtually movement, virtually restoration of level difference of the energy of the
Universe after its current substantial burnout (entropy) and it will allow the
gradual resurrection from the dead of all dead living creatures through steady
supply of new energy in this our Universe by the reproduction of more and more
people before death, whose brains, virtually bodies will embody
multiplicatively the Universe, and unlike normal Posthumous or cloning of
descendants of a single human before death after his or her death, when there
is a constant stagnation or continual loss of level difference of energy of the
Universe newly embodied by the brain, virtually body of the child, that is the
constant stagnation or deepening of entropy (burn) of the Universe and its
approaching absolute vacuum.
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MY PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE AND
CONTEMPORARY RELIGIONS?
All contemporary religions operate like an opium (as Karl Marx already
pointed out), then as a drug, which facilitates human being
in a world, where is so much death and pain, promising a reward of the perfect
life of their adherents in the invisible world and many religions remove from
them the bad conscience from killing of living creatures. Here, I mean Hindu,
which promises salvation from suffering in this world-moksha through their
fusion with the divine essence, Brahman, Buddhism, which promises
emptiness-nirvana after death, Judaism and Christianity, which promise heaven
with God, virtually Jesus of Nazareth maybe the Christ as the king after the
death of a man.
These
religions cure, improve with this drug the world by pointing to the man’s
responsibility for his or her life after death, when using the so-called
subconscious oceanic feeling in the psyche of every man and in my opinion, as
well as of other living beings for life in a world, where everyone likes each other.
Many of these religions are also a danger of fanaticism, because that drug
relieves humans of their evil conscience from killing of living creatures
through various rituals.
Philosophy of Balance is not such a drug, because it promises a reward for its implementation already in this visible world (not only
after death), in the form of a life of individual, who everyone loves and who
loves everybody (it is concerned the realization of the oceanic feeling of a
man in this world, a reward of happy life in this world promised by an earlier
form of Judaism as well, but that in the history the Holocaust of orthodox Jews
refuted definitively, the reason for this tragedy according to my Philosophy of
Balance was that Judaism functioned in the past, such as that drug, because it
silenced the remorse of bad conscience from killing of especially other living
creatures than humans). Philosophy of the Balance is not the drug, because it
promises an early change in our world (not only after death). In a world, where
everybody likes each other, where all the living creatures would be friends for
life and death, through the proposed text of the slaughter tax (similarly early
arrival of salvation of our world was promised by early Christianity through
the second coming of Jesus of Nazareth, Christ maybe, when this coming did not
take place, they resigned early redemption of our world and Christian
teaching was changed on that drug, promising a reward to his followers after
their death).
Given the
above, the Philosophy of Balance is not one of many other religions, but a
rational attempt to change our world already in this life, of which success or
failure, both in its use in the personal life of individuals as in the case of
using the proposed text of the slaughter tax for the whole society, allow
its verification (in terms of falsification of scientific theories defined by
philosopher Karl Popper), then its confirmation or refutation through a
scientific experiment.
HOW TO ENFORCE THE SLAUGHTER
TAX IN POLITICS?
The answer can be found in my Philosophy
of Balance. The animals themselves have no power to enforce the slaughter tax,
or to vote for it, nor, that they can fight for it with weapons in hand, so
present politicians have no interest to enforce it, because it would not bring
them any more popularity with their target voters groups. This is similar to
the protection of unborn human embryos under the Catholic Church vain to
prohibit abortions, human embryos also cannot make war or vote. Therefore, for
now the enforcement of the slaughter tax is in a still relatively favorable
political and economic situation virtually impossible.
The only regime that succeeded
in enforcing extensive animal protection in Europe was Hitler's Nazi regime in
Germany. Roughly, therefore, it would be said that it was necessary to kill
people for the enforcement of extensive animal protection, the result of this
attempt ended also in a total failure.
According to the Philosophy of
Balance deepening of the current economic and political crisis in the Western
world will continue, at the end of this crisis here will be once again the
general misery, ruins of economies, the establishment of dictatorships and war
in the Western world will be as under fascism in the last century. According to
the Philosophy of Balance the reason for this crisis is evolutionary
imperfection, virtually. immorality in the Western world that blatantly lives
on debt, in other words they misspend goods belonging to someone else to rob
the State, tunneling by the rich, the poor in unearned social benefits, the
cause of immorality, virtually evolutionary imperfection of Westerners is then
according to my Philosophy of Balance hatred and revenge of to death tortured
living creatures by our civilization, especially livestock in industrial
factory farms, virtually hatred and revenge of living microorganisms of these
to death tortured living creatures and their relatives living microorganisms.
Therefore, one might say
according to the Philosophy of Balance in terms of livestock and other animals
and the future enactment of the slaughter tax, the worse will be the global
crisis, virtually suffering of people, the better, either from which people
will learn and they will enact timely the slaughter tax and thus stop rising
above revenge of our civilization to death tortured living creatures,
especially animals, or they will not learn from it, and then either our
civilization will stop to exist, such as nuclear war, or the slaughter tax will
be enforced at the cost of blood of many people through the victory of a
dictator, Nazism was traditionally protecting animals, so for example the new
Nazi dictator.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
SECONDARY
SCHOOL PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.
The Secondary School
Philosophy of Balance was purchased for production costs by: Study and Research
Library of the Pilsen Region (Pilsen).
This book is licensed under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.cs
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
http://www.spvzt.cz/Stredoskolskafilosofierovnovahy.html
(book in
Czech in the format: html , pdf , doc , cover in the format pdf , doc )
http://www.spvzt.cz/EngSecondarySchoolBalancePhilosophy.htm
( 
book in English in the format: html , pdf
, doc
, cover in the format: html , pdf , doc )
PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:
„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a
world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still
obliged to cause the least possible death and pain."
All the rest consists more in views (speculations).
(I.e. the maximum compliance of good and evil
individuals, virtually good and evil)
Secondary School Philosophy of
Balance presents a detailed summary of the basics of all current human
knowledge and putting it in a single system, according to the Philosophy of
Balance.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
Symbiotic agriculture and experiments of natural
science proving Philosophy of Balance
I want to grow potatoes according to my Philosophy of
Balance, potatoes are next to the corn along with soy products the important plant
component of my food in extreme emergency, it is not a plant fruit or plant
seed, due to prioritization of national
foods and farmers to non eco-friendly imported foods at a greater distance,
but which can support on the other hand poor developing countries of producers
of these foods, and they could become an important component of the diet of my
hens.
I want to educate pests of potatoes, in particular Elytrigia and Colorado potato beetles not to reproduce
excessively, then they will also have the right according to my Philosophy of
Balance to a long, happy and dignified life and death with almost no physical
and mental pain. Therefore, I will intervene against them according to the
rules of the Philosophy of Balance only if they reproduce excessively. If they
do not reproduce excessively, then I will let them to eat my potato plants
which apparently will improve the quality of their existing variety as regards
their resistance against these pests. It will be a kind of symbiosis between my
plants, namely potatoes and their pests, in particular Elytrigia and Colorado potato beetles.
If I succeed in the education of pests of my plants of
potatoes not to reproduce excessively and to live in symbiosis with my plants
of potatoes, so it will be a proof that nature can be merciful, even at such a
primitive level, such as insects and plants that even at this level and in this case of quite
hostile species of living creatures it is possible and the best solution for
all concerned their symbiosis and that their Darwin’s fighting for life and
death is also in this case only the possible and at the same time the worst
solution.
The first scientific proof of
my Philosophy of Balance, or possibility of nature to be merciful as its best
solution at the level of animal production is, inter alia, the symbiosis of my
dog, or carnivore, of me or omnivore and of my hens or our exclusive animal
prey, when meat diet of my dog and of me as a person and probably even of my
hens is formed for several years exclusively by corpses of naturally dead hens,
in principle, of old age from my shelter for broilers (see my book Philosophy of Balance, Book II
Application of Philosophy of Balance in material world, 2nd Part the Behavior
according to Philosophy of Balance).
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
, www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 18/07/2013 13:10:42
Post:
Today I harvested my other two plants of my potatoes from my above
symbiotic way of agriculture, from both planted potatoes I gained the harvest
of 2551 grams of healthy large early potatoes. I waited for a green herb of
potato plant to become dry, so that the whole plant did not die at harvest. The result of
this experiment proves a real possibility in the nature of possible maximal
symbiosis (i.e. harmony or paradise) of my entire food chain of me as a human,
my dog, my hens (males and females), my potatoes and their pests,
especially Elytrigia and Colorado potato beetles, hence of all living
creatures.
(my) Photos: https://www.facebook.com/dalibor.gruza/media_set?set=a.10200289137693320.1073741827.1299966627&type=1
(see www.spvzt.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz
, www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz )
In details
see book:
http://www.spvzt.cz/symbiotickezemedelstvi.htm
(book in Czech in the format: html
, pdf , doc )
http://www.spvzt.cz/symbioticagriculture.htm
(
book in English in the format: html
, pdf , doc )
Moderated discussion on the
political orientation of SPVŽT:
Posts to a
moderated discussion, please send on zakladatel@spvzt.cz , the editorial staff
reserves the right not to publish inappropriate posts
1. Position of Philosophy of Balance on Judeo-Christian morality of today’s
democratic society http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1650 : Smířil jsem se se svou katolickou církví
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 28/10/2011 12:18:33
I disagree with the eccelesiastical financial restitution, therefore,
already for about a quarter of a year I do not go, and I will continue not to
go here for confession and to Holy communion until there will be some
adoption of a fair solution to the Roman-Catholic Church.
I agree with the physical restitution of assets to churches, primarily
because the Church performs useful work in the society, thus they preach love
and educate us in love. I disagree with the monetary church restitution in the
amount of 100 billion Czech Crowns, because the State will have to borrow for
this financial restitution, because due to its debts in the State budget of the
Czech Republic, and probably given the current debt ratio of State it will not
have money even in the future. The ideal solution would be to return to Churches
in ecclesiastical restitution physically half of the assets the churches would
relinquish half of the assets that will not be returned, for the fact that half
of the State current contribution at ratio of the State budget will remain in
future years. This solution would enable financing of as well newly emerging
churches, which will also be preaching and educating society in love, and would
prevent such that Churches will not corrupt, to which the property would be
returned.
Now to the Roman-Catholic theological look at my Philosophy of Balance and at
by me advocated Act concerning the slaughter tax, which can
be summarized as follows:
PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE
PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:
„All living creatures in
fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each
other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible
death and pain."
All the rest consists more in
views (speculations). It applies to all my Philosophy of Balance.
(I.e. the maximum compliance
of good and evil individuals, virtually good and evil)
Apparently according to the traditions of the Catholic Church (as in the Bible
these words are not probably): the structure and layout of the Eucharistic
Celebration, Schematic overview of the course of the
celebration of the Eucharist (Sundays and festivals), the sacrificial feast,
preparation of the gifts, Eucharistic prayer: preface and Sanctus, epiclesis
before the words of the provision, the words of the provisions of the
Eucharist, anamnesis, bringing victims to communion, epiclesis prayers with
reminders of the Saints, the doxology, the third Eucharistic prayer (as an
example)
After preface and Sanctus priest with spread hands says:
Verily you are a holy God, (epiclesis)
and everything, that you
created, rightly praise you: ...
(Literature: http://www.tf.jcu.cz/getfile/5caa213d79580807 : Bible of Kralice, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Theology)
Prayer the Our Father (the Holy Bible, Matthew Chapter 6, verses 9-10):
9 After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven,
Hallowed be thy name.
10 Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth, as it
is in heaven.
(Literature: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew%206&version=KJV
)
Comment according to the Philosophy of Balance:
Therefore, "our father", not just the father of the people, but
our father, that is also of all living creatures. "Everything, that you
created, rightly praise you", i.e. all rightly praise you, therefore, not
only people, but also every living creature, that you created and that you seem
to be a father, because you created them, which, however, also apparently
assumes that mercy in the form of the victim of a living creature for another
living creature, or creatures, especially for a human or people. How can creatures
praise rightly the God, if He requires necessarily living creatures by
ruthless, very painful victim or their life in a lot of pain or a very painful
death after a short life in great pain, in this case these tortured living
creatures would hate the God rather than the God rightly praise. God thus
necessarily requires of all living creatures, in particular of human the sacrifice
but only a merciful sacrifice, death almost without pain after a long, little painful
life of all living creatures, even though the living creature dies, they will love
the God rightly and not hate.
To the slaughter tax, it can be noted that the will of God shall be both in heaven and in
earth (see above: "Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven."),
that God is rightly praised by everything He created, therefore by all living creatures
(see above: "and everything, that you created, rightly praise you")
as it is in heaven and in earth (see above: "Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven."), which is at present mainly in conflict with the torture of
animals in current agricultural slaughter factory farms. The slaughter
tax fixes the will of God (Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.) to
be closer to all living creatures, today in particular, so the most tortured
animals in the agricultural slaughter factory farms, could rightly praise the God
their creator (see above: "and everything, that you created, rightly praise
you").
(see http://filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ )
2. And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer
also the other http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1589 : Miluji i nepřátele kraj. pravice útočící Fil.rovn.
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 26/05/2012
quoted:
Neronisi,
According to the Philosophy of Balance is the sentence: And unto him that
smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away
thy cloak forbid not to take thy coat also., of the Gospels
6.29 Luke, in violation with the foundation of the teachings of Jesus of
Nazareth, perhaps Christ, which is love. It comes to me from 51-60% to be a
late addition. The correct approach to this situation by love is a Universal
ethic of my Philosophy of Balance, Ist book. The correct answer to this
situation should be referred to my ethics always educational (i.e., lovingly
kept), rather than a devastating counterattack. I'll give you an example,
imagine a child who hits his or her parents into one face, if his parent give
another face and have not made any educational countermeasures, so eventually the
child could grow into a serial killer. Love of the parents of such a child is
reflected primarily in the form of educational countermeasure that is done with
love, so to correct this error in the child's behavior, not to devastate the
child as punishment.
I do the same educational, not a devastating counter-measure against the
attack of extreme right-wingers, maybe the fascists against unlawful attack
against the Philosophy of Balance, we will not see the future of serial
killers, and they make educational countermeasure against my weakness in
battle, in other words they learn me by their attacks to fight. It comes as a
method of mutual education, rather than to destroy us all, by merciful
evolution of nature, theologically-biblically speaking, the evolution of nature
educates us through our relationships like the Lord - Judge of hosts (Hebrew adonaj
cava), which can be translated as the Mister - Lord of Army (see my movie).
(see http://filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ )
see http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?whichpage=0.933333333333333&TOPIC_ID=1589捅: Miluji i nepřátele kraj. pravice útočící Fil.rovn.
3. How are different and how are the same Nazism and Philosophy of Balance http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1589 : Miluji i nepřátele kraj. pravice útočící Fil.rovn.
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 06/06/2011 10:37:58
The basics of the philosophy of Nazism can be described as follows:
... Hitler expressed this attitude by the words: "nature is cruel
and that's why I'm cruel.", i.e. social Darwinism, therefore, it could
be rephrased: "Charles Darwin discovered in his theory of nature evolution,
that nature is cruel, because even the Nazis are cruel", so they can kill
the enemy women and children as the wild animals, which like a pack of wolves
would be merciful only to healthy members of their pack, in the wild they kill
females and baby animals of their prey, unlike Stalin and his army, who
according to an ancient tradition as the continuator of steppe Mongols were not
allowed to kill women and children.
Or according to Himmler: "a man is nothing special, just a piece of
nature", or in the training manual, SS: the concept of humanity is
biological nonsense, or humanism is under the Nazis, or according to
Darwinism, the artificial creation of a man which is against nature and not valid
in the wild.
Nietzsche's philosophy is a mere transfer of Darwinism in philosophy. The
Western concept of Darwinism, that the struggle for life in the food chain in
human society takes place in the framework of the free market, is inconsistent using
of the Darwinism, which maintains the validity, contrary to Darwinism and its
teachings, many of the old religious, primarily Jewish and Christian morality
in society.
Literature: On October 4, 1943 Himmler
spoke to the commanders of the SS in Poznan. Among other things he stated, that
a member of the SS must be honest, moral, faithful and comradely to all the members
of their own blood, but never to anyone else. What will happen with the
Russians, what will happen with the Czechs, it is totally unconcerned to him. It
is necessary to save and to place the children of a good German blood in
Germany. He was interested whether other people live in luxury or starve to
death, only if they served the German culture. About starvation to death of ten
thousands of Russian women during the digging of the anti-tank ditch he did not
care, important to him it was, whether the tank ditch for Germany was
completed. The Germans are the only real people in the world and as well as they
behave decently towards animals, they behave decently towards these human
animals, but it would be a crime against their own blood to worry about them
and to communicate their ideas with them. He pointed out, that about the
resettlement of the Jews and about the mass extermination of the Jewish race the
members of the SS must never speak publicly. Most of the members of the SS have
already seen hundreds, thousands of corpses together. Nevertheless apart from
exception of human weakness the members of the SS must remain polite. Therein
their hardness lies. (see http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Himmler
) It was Frederick Nietzsche, the spiritual father of the concepts of the "human-predator"
and the "blond beast", who came in the second half of the 19th
century with the suggestive doctrine, of which essence was the division of
moral systems on the system of the slaves (adhering to regret, compassion and
altruism) and the system of lords (praising selfishness, sensory delights and
contempt for the weak). Boria Sax writes: "Nietzsche was of the opinion,
that the morality of slaves is the credo of the illness and the morality of lords
is the credo of the health. In Judaism and even more in Christianity the weak won
over the strong." And further: "Predators" in the ranks of
people were destined to give orders, 'the vegetarians' were destined to obey."
It is significant, that Nietzsche had never apparently seen a large predator
elsewhere than at the zoo and even he did not specify, which specific animal he
had in mind. Wolves, bears, lions and eagles he melded in a single super
predator. … Darwin's thesis, that the success in the competitive struggle for
survival had favoured individual races according to "level of their civilization",
in Germany Ernst Haeckel led to the extreme, when he declared, that the
Germanic race came from great apes the furthest away. Richard Wagner wrote that
"'inferior races' come 'from the monkeys', while the Aryans derive their
origin 'from the gods'." … "Hitler was a vegetarian and he apparently
tried to imitate the composer Richard Wagner. Several leaders of the Nazi government
followed him, including Hess and Goebbels. Himmler, who was influenced by
Buddhism, even ordered eating vegetarian diet to commanders. (see review of the
book Zvířata ve Třetí říši (Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust), Boria
Sax, American historian and linguist, Pavel Hub, Klimkovice 2011, http://www.kockaapravo.cz/clanky-clanek.php?id=33 )
This, or Darwinism is in violation of the foundations of evolutionary
hypotheses according to the Philosophy of Balance, which
could be summarized as follows:
Nature is merciful, therefore I am merciful (see my
documentary film: "The Philosophy of Balance and the slaughter tax. Is nature’s
evolution merciful?" with the opinions of experts- naturalists to this evolutionary
hypothesis).
The largest of the humanism, or universal love or general mercy and the
greatest strength of the approaching omnipotence; (see Hebrew
biblical name adonaj cava, which can be translated as Lord - Mister or God of
hosts or Lord - Mister or God of Army) is the goal of evolution or
development of nature in all living creatures (through my natural
evolutionary hypotheses about the ability of any micro-organisms to identify
and also genetically remember their friend and enemy, partly proven by me by
the symbiosis of my dog, or predator and my hens or his only animal prey,
see my theme Paradise begins with a scientific experiment on my garden on the
Forum http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1375 : Ráj začíná vědeckým pokusem na mé zahradě
).
In my opinion the result of the above erroneous outcomes of Nazism,
consisting in the application of Darwinism was the ultimate evolutionary
failure of Hitler and Nazi Germany in World War II.
But I agree with Nazism, as in Nazi Germany valid until today the most
sophisticated and extensive legislated protection of animals and nature, ever
enacted in Europe, is concerned (Hitler,
Goring, Himmler and Rudolf Hess could be described as a major nature conservationist,
in today's terminology the Green party in Europe politicians, Hitler reportedly
oversaw himself the creation of these laws on the protection of nature and
animals). And it's because of my evolutionary hypotheses about nature, to be
merciful, so that in nature there is the only morality, or love or mercy in
relation to all living creatures, even to those microorganisms as the only
living cell, bacteria or virus, so that a double morality does not exist in
nature and does not apply, i.e. interpersonal morality and morality to other
living creatures. The basic evolutionary natural law of this morality is
according to the Philosophy of Balance to all living creatures still causing
the least possible death and pain.
(see http://filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ )
Literature:
http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nacismus
, http://is.muni.cz/th/102931/fss_b/Pelikan_BP_Pojeti_krajiny_a_jeji_ochrany_v_nacismu.txt : Vojtěch Pelikán, MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA V BRNĚ, Fakulta sociálních studií, Brno 2007, diplomová práce
, film Mongol, Kazakhstan, 2007, directed by Sergei Bodrov; Cast: Tadanobu
Asano (Temüdžin), Amadou Mamadakov, Honglei Sun, Ying Bai
4. Position of Philosophy of
Balance on Nazism and Stalinism http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1589 : Miluji i nepřátele kraj. pravice útočící Fil.rovn.
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 24/05/2011 11:00:59
So far discussions on http://www.exotopedia.org/wiki/Diskuse:Dalibor_Gr%C5%AFza
including my censored contribution:
…
I don't consider your web site as good, I consider them as a far-right, therefore apparently it is a Server
Location: Spartanburg, SC in the United States, they are insulting the people
of another skin color and people with disabilities, and praise Mr. Vandas from
the Workers Party of Social Justice, and as some
form of negative publicity for my work Philosophy of Balance. According to the Philosophy
of Balance Stalin and his army were so evolutionarily unjust, yet much
evolutionarily fairer than Hitler and his army, because Stalin and his army did
not murder in an organized mass way women and children, and that, unlike Hitler
and his army, who roughly from 1941 killed in an organized mass way Jewish and
Roma women and children. To kill a child or a woman, according to the Philosophy
of Balance is the biggest evolutionary injustices in our world, which is,
according to my Philosophy of Balance, most likely the most punished by the
evolution of nature, because it causes the greatest possible hate of friends. Philosophy
of Balance welcomes on Hitler and Germany in particular the fact that until
today they have yet enacted unrivalled extensive animal welfare legislation in
Nazi Germany and apparently also on the German occupied territories. This Hitler's
animal protection is also carrying out only obligation of all living creatures
according to the Philosophy of Balance still to cause the least possible death
and pain, and apparently its evolutionary Hitler’s reward was his success
in the war until 1941.
Literature: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights#1933:_Tierschutzgesetz
5. Discussion with some members of my former Green Party
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 4:56 AM
Theme:
Re: concurrence of membership in two political parties
Enforcement of the slaughter tax in current politics is better than the
current political enforcement of the ban (as suggested by the part of the
animal protectors) for many reasons. Currently it better corresponded to the
main legal and moral obligation of all living creatures, to still causing the
least possible death and pain (in each particular moment of history and their
lives) according to my Philosophy of Balance (approximately 700 pages A4), of
which two books are available on this Web site. See the web site of a new Party
for the Rights of All Living Creatures, see http://www.spvzt.cz/
.
Dr. Grůza
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 5:44 AM
Theme:
Re: concurrence of membership in two political parties
Currently, taxation of the slaughter tax is politically more realistic of
which income will be tied in the Act, inter alia, to the transformation of our
agriculture into more merciful, inter alia, slaughter breeding of animals,
rather than a ban on agricultural slaughter of factory farming-animal
concentration camps.
Dr. Grůza
Sent:
Friday, November 23, 2012 5:54 AM
Theme:
Re: concurrence of membership in two political parties
My
Philosophy of Balance foresees in the future, when a democracy will be
prepared for it, to increase the slaughter tax on products from agricultural
slaughter factory farming-animal concentration camps at such a high level,
which will be equal to the practical prohibition, or a complete ban on the
slaughter factory farming, both in the domestic and the imported products from
abroad to the Czech Republic.
Dr. Grůza
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 6:05 AM
Theme: Re: concurrence of membership in two political parties
In addition,
the slaughter tax will apply a lower rate in principle, also on the other slaughters
of animals for example even in organic farms, unlike products from animals,
dead of natural causes, especially of old age.
Dr. Grůza
6. Why are
agricultural slaughter factory farms today's concentration camps of animals
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 27/11/2012
In these agricultural
slaughter factory farms an animal lives from birth its entire short life, which
lasts until its early slaughter in the great suffering, unlike home and also organic
slaughter breeds of these animals. After the birth of the animal an animal is in
these agricultural slaughter factory farms doped by growth hormones, so that it
quickly has the weight, it is limited in movement, in order not to lose gained weight,
and in a month or two it goes to slaughter, its entire short life it is so tortured
by human. See http://www.ohz.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=44&Itemid=83 : Občanské sdružení ohz –
ochránci hospodářských
zvířat, Marcela Frei (prezidentka)
.
7. Interview
with Hare Krishna-an important Hindu organization and Hindus about eating meat
and carnivores
On 18. May
2013, at 6:48 PM, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.-advokát <ak-gruza@seznam.cz>
wrote:
Dear
Hinduist,
...
I was doing an experiment (see my book Philosophy of Balance www.spvzt.cz
or www.spvzt.sweb.cz
) with my longstanding ovo-lacto vegetarian diet (for the uninitiated, I have
eaten plant diet, from animal food only milk and eggs), while I was watching
the composition of my food, there was no animal ingredient from slaughtered
animals, for example food additives, I have not eaten any food supplements or
vitamins that could be made from slaughtered animals.
The result of this my
long-term ovo-lacto vegetarian diet has been the following health problems:
abdominal pain, flatulence, diarrhea, vomiting, sores on the mucous membranes,
skin peeling, allergic shock (itching and rash throughout the body), sore on
joints and articular cartilage, fatigue or tiredness at any greater effort,
these problems will disappear whenever I eat the meat of my carrions (cadavers)
of animals. Because of your moral
resistance to eat carrions (cadavers) I will not die of nutritional inadequacy,
for this reason because of my moral scruples I don't have to kill, or I don't have
to get killed intentionally any animal for the purpose of my food and I will
continue to eat the minimum required amount of carrions
(cadavers) of the animals when my above health symptoms occur.
Dr.
Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.
Answer for SPVŽT:
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 09-12/12/2012
The Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures, wants to unite and
fight for the rights of all living creatures, as the living creatures I think
both people and animals, including the carnivorous animals, and also plants and
other living creatures.
I don't want to split forces, therefore, I want to fight only against our
current worst evil in relation to animals, factory slaughter farms. To do
this, you need the money for the transformation of our agriculture in a more
merciful ways of animal farming, which the slaughter tax should serve.
According to me it is the first most important step in a good direction of SPVŽT,
according to the society's readiness the next will follow.
I myself don't eat products from slaughtered animals, even not my dog,
from animal foods I eat only eggs from a home breed, where they do not
slaughter or get slaughtered any hens and cocks, or goat's milk from breed,
where they do not slaughter or get slaughtered any goats or he - goats, and
broilers from my shelter for chickens, which have not been killed intentionally
by any human, deceased of old age. These naturally dead chickens I also feed my
dog including eggs and the milk and vegetarian feed ami dog. I myself
would probably not survive healthy in my experience only on the ovo-lacto
vegetarian diet without this meat, and quite surely in my experience without
this meat my dog, which is a carnivore, wouldn't survive healthy.
My opinion about the medical necessity of eating the meat in my case and in
the case of my dog is based on my experience, or fixed by my scientific experiment
with my long-term lacto-ovo vegetarian diet in my case and in the case of my
dog (see my book Philosophy of Balance available on this site). By the way
in India there are kept almost no carnivorous cats and dogs because people do
not want to feed them meat. And what concerns the health need to eat meat to
humans living long-term in India, whose ancestors were the generation
accustomed to eating meat, I present an example of the current Dalai Lama,
who, though he wants to be a vegetarian, had serious health problems and he began
to eat meat (see http://mysticbanana.com/why-isnt-the-dalai-lama-a-vegetarian.html : Me, 2010
).
Eating naturally dead animals by human is not a new idea, but the idea is
thousands of years old and it comes from India. Survived in old Roma (sometimes
also Gypsies), who originate and in the middle ages they came to Europe
from India. "Under the old Roma are carrions (cadavers) cleaner meat,
because the animal didn't die in a violent death", and Roma also invented
an ingenious recipe, how to eat the carrions (cadavers), "the carrions
are boiled in more waters" (see http://www.mills.cz/assets/Absol_prace/AP2010-SP_denni/Rosecka-SP2010.pdf : Vyšší odborná
škola a Střední zdravotnická
škola, MILLS, s. r. o., Tereza Rosecká,
Vedoucí práce: ThDr. et Mgr. Ladislava
Marešová, Čelákovice, 2010, Život
romské menšiny)), and it was at least thousands of years ago, when they came to Europe, and
when no one has ever heard of the sterilization of surgical instruments. See my
book Philosophy of Balance on this web site.
After our discussion with Trilokátma dása 11.12.2012 I received by post the
current guide named GÓRAKŠJA and vegetarianism, issued or distributed by
farm Krishna court of Hare Krishna movement in the Czech Republic, where there
is on the page 5 stated:
"If the people who despite all the counterarguments insist on
preserving animal food sources, they will eat only animals that die in a
natural way, they avoid ingestion of "fear poisons". The animals will
produce more offspring and understandable after a transitional period of a lack
one get more meat than before. "
According by you cited a Dutch political party translated from English, see http://www.partyfortheanimals.nl/content/view/308//faq/view/50/14 : Party for the Animals – Animal Politics Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
:
Is the Party for the Animals against eating meat or fish?
The most animal-friendly menu
is one without any animal produce. A
large number of the members of the Party for the Animals are vegetarians or
vegans. However, we also have members who eat meat or fish. It is not a
choice that we try to force upon others.
Nonetheless, we do strongly advocate that consumers (both party members and non
- party members) who eat animal products should chose meat, eggs or dairy
products, which do not derive from the factory farming industry, and non - endangered
fish species
Dr. Grůza
The opinion of the international society for Krishna Consciousness, the
Hare Krishna Movement-an important Hindu organisation:
Author: Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the
international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement
Time: 09/12/2012
Hello Mr. Grůzo,
When I started reading your message, I was happy that somebody finally is
starting to care about animal suffering caused in the slaughterhouses. Very
soon, however, my enthusiasm has passed me when I read that you are not
concerned about whether the animals are killed, but rather that they are
"killed in the organic way”. Only the expression of organic slaughter
breeding is at least for me incredible. On the slaughter of whether any is not
merciful, fair, or organic. I understand that in the current agricultural farms
are experiencing animals during their short and poor life far more suffering
than in some organic farms, but the result is the same, in the end, the animals
are cruelly killed.
In the Statute you write that you want to create a humanistic society on the
principles of Justice and mercy to all living creatures. I don't understand
what you consider as merciful and fair at organic slaughter breeding. In the Statute
you write that your intention is the gradual transition to a more merciful way of
diet, but at the same time you don't want to force anyone to switch to
vegetarianism. There is, according to you a merciful alternative to killing? I
think that your idea of factory farming, in which the animals die of old age,
and then they will be ingested by carnivores, is as unrealistic as
trying to convince dependent gambler that to play chess is better for him or
her than to spend the money on the slot machines.
If it is in your interest to really reduce animal suffering, then I suggest
inspiration from such a Dutch political party ( http://www.partyfortheanimals.nl/ : Party for the Animals – Animal Politics Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
), the program is very well expressed in this document: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2uTJsZrX2wI : Film: Global Warming Documentary: MEAT THE TRUTH, GlobeTransformer.
Please do not take my comments too personally, but attempt of your Party is
reminiscent to me of the debate about whether the dry side of the turd is
better than clammy. The turd will always remain the turd whether it's dry or
wet, and the killing remains killing, whether they killed animals from factory
farming or organic farms.
One more note to your program. On what basis do you think most carnivores could
not survive healthy by transition to a vegetarian diet? I don't think all the
carnivores were able to adopt a vegetarian diet. But not for the reason that it
would be medically dangerous, but because they simply cannot imagine their life
without meat, such as a smoker's life without cigarettes or an alcoholic life
without booze. However, there are solutions, without any compromising in the
form of killing. You can have a look here: http://www.vegetarianbutcher.com/ : THE VEGETARIAN BUTCHER, 4824 AV Breda, The Netherlands, http://bittman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/26/having-your-chicken-without-eating-it/ : Mark Bittman
, http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/features/is-this-the-end-of-meat-7765871.html : IS THIS THE END OF MEAT?, Kate Burt, 2012
.
I hope that you do not find my comments insulting, and I am open to any further
discussion.
I wish you good luck
Signed Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the international
society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement
Author: Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the
international society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement
Time: 10/12/2012
... I would be quite interested in your long-term scientific experiment with a
lacto-vegetarian diet. It's this diet, which threatens your health or even
the life? It is interesting that millions of vegetarians around the world are
not at risk. Even the doctors today confirmed that a balanced lacto-vegetarian diet
supplies the body with all the necessary materials. I personally know hundreds
of vegetarians whose ancestors ate meat for generations and they still do not
have any health problems. ...
Signed Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the international
society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement
Author: Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the international society
for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement
Time: 11/12/2012
... Again, I ask about the texts or the authority of the idea of eating the carrions
(cadavers)? Where or whom is your claim substantiated? Vedic culture
functioning under the rule of Kings in the territory of India and in other
places thousands years ago very strictly limited eating the meat. In addition,
the King took care of it, that this limit was respected. However, if someone
could not give up meat eating, they could, under certain restrictive conditions,
eat meat of goats, poultry and other lower animals. These population groups,
however, have never been mainstream and worked more or less on the sidelines,
that they do not disrupt the residents happy with a lacto-vegetarian diet.
This information is very detailed in the Purāṇas and in particular in the
Bhágavata Purāṇa,
also known as Srimad Bhagavatam, but also in many other places of the Vedic
literature such as the Manu’s code-Manu samhita. ...
... you will be like the meat eaters banished to the sidelines and at
best considered as uncivilized barbarians. ...
Signed Antonín Valer Trilokátma, dása, a spokesman for the international
society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement
The entire
interview with the spokesman of the international society for Krishna
Consciousness, the Hare Krishna Movement, in Czech, in pdf format, see:
http://www.spvzt.cz/HaraKrisnacelyrozhovor.pdf
or http://stranazapravavsechzivychtvoru.sweb.cz/HaraKrisnacelyrozhovor.pdf
8. Merciful diet of a woman – a
mother and a child during pregnancy and breastfeeding http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1375 : Ráj začíná vědeckým pokusem na mé zahradě
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 20/09/2013
Post:
quoted:
Post of Dalibor Grůza
Pregnant and breastfeeding woman may not survive
healthy without food from dead animals (see my Philosophy of Balancethe chapter
Appendices-Rational Mystique, End), but I cannot force her to eat my broiler
carrions (cadavers), albeit after the autopsy by a veterinarian and boiled in
several waters, not to impair the health and the life of herself and a child. However, at the same time, according to my Philosophy
of Balance I may not needlessly sacrifice any living creature or cause
unnecessary pain. Therefore, it is probably wrong according to my Philosophy of
Balance, to have a baby with my wife on the condition because a woman or a
child had to eat the food from slaughtered animals. Therefore, I have to fight
until the last moment together with by me based political Party for the Rights
of All Living Creatures for the reform of legislation and the establishment of
lawful business establishments for the production of animals carrions
(cadavers) died of old age intended for the general public, which would not
jeopardise their consumption of mother and child, so I could choose my eventual
wife-mother with this diet from these carrions (cadavers).
It is a healthy diet at the same time allowing me a
long life, at my age I have for fatherhood theoretically time up to 96 years of
my age (woman on maternity benefits only to approximately 48 years of her age,
so I have to give freedom to my former partner, who is now 41 years old, to
find somebody else, because it is highly likely that I fail to establish this
legislative reform within 7 years). If I then fail to establish the legislation
reform, then it will mean the failure of my life that I'll be able to choose
to seek a wife and our child, who will be at least during pregnancy and
breastfeeding eating food from slaughtered animals, e.g., organic meat,
becoming once again a mortal enemy of the sacrificial animals slaughtered and
the subject of their revenge, and of their relatives.
Literature: http://www.novinky.cz/koktejl/281843-ind-se-stal-v-96-letech-nejstarsim-otcem-na-svete.html : 2012, vps, Novinky
quoted:
Post of Dalibor Grůza
It would be against
the base of my psyche (i.e. among others I would mentally not survive) to be a
deadly enemy of any living creature, if I caused a lot of possibly unnecessary
(i.e. larger than the smallest) death and pain, e.g. if I had children at a
cost of eating slaughtered animals by me, my partner or my offspring. This
means that I could not and it probably would not, at least in my case, be
correct to sacrifice friendship and love of all living creatures, when eating
organic meat see above for that I had a child with a woman who at the time of
pregnancy and breast-feeding had to eat organic meat. The beautiful is love of
all living creatures, the terrible is mortal hatred of unnecessarily killed
living creatures. This means that my only option to have a child with a woman
is a legal reform for the purpose of selling the food from naturally dead
animals, dead of old age, in normal stores for the safe consumption of such food for my wife and
child during pregnancy and lactation.
(see http://www.spvzt.cz/
, http://www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ , http://www.spvzt.sweb.cz/
)
Maybe I will
have to be a deadly enemy of animals killed for and eaten by my possible
pregnant and nursing woman and by my possible child at the cost of fratricides,
i.e. the mutual murders among the people, whether it's me, my possible partner
or my possible children (see Abel and Cain, and Adam and Eve in the biblical
Paradise), but if any for
now it is premature. I will be forced to choose this option when I consider
it as necessary, i.e. my Philosophy of Balance, i.e. my theory of merciful
nature, i.e. possibility of all living creatures to live in a world where
everyone likes each other will be refuted.
If the above refutation of my Philosophy of Balance is
not nor the above sale of carrions (cadavers) of animals died of natural
causes, in principle, of old age in ordinary shops, nor my potential partner nor
our potential joint child eating exclusively in the vegetarian way or from died
animals only my as much as possible tested (carrions) of animals died of
natural causes, in principle of old age (because my previous partner eats a lot
of slaughtered animals and because in my experience it takes at least 3,5-7
years before martyred living cells and their related living cells forget predominantly
their deadly enmity of human after his or her change to cause still the least
possible death and pain, that she and also the baby were healthy, which my
previous partner in the current age of 41 years until her age 48 years, i.e.
her infertility can hardly make it, note: even according to science, as I later
discovered, the living cells change completely except nerve cells in the human
body once every 7 years, see http://hejnic.webnode.cz/jara/hlava/uceni/biologie-cloveka/ : Jaroslav Hejnic, )
until my infertility, so I die childless from the above reasons,
And because I
also in fact mostly want to live in a world where everyone likes each other (i.e. in paradise), therefore I
am also still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain, it means,
that I also in fact mostly do not want to cause a lot of unnecessary (i.e. much
more than the least possible) death and pain (i.e. according to my existent experience, as I try to show in my
Philosophy of Balance, my real main desire, virtually in my opinion the real
main driving force behind the evolution of nature for other living creatures
are not primitive instincts of self-preservation /more at males/ and to reproduce /more at females/, i.e.
struggle for life and death, as taught by Darwinists, such as presented by
Richard Dawkins in his work The Selfish Gene, but for both above a complex emotional relationship of mercy, virtually
of love, i.e. symbiosis, i.e. “all living creatures in fact mostly want to live
in a world, where everyone likes each other”, see http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pud_(psychologie)
, http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoce
, http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altruismus
) and I also do not want to
suffer much before my death or to die prematurely (see single dogma of my
Philosophy of Balance), and this even more than to have my own eventual
offspring.
The above
dilemma, according to my Philosophy of Balance seems to be the result of
punishment of micro-organisms for my ancestors and my big causing unnecessary
death and pain, especially of animals and for my own still causing almost
exclusively necessary death and pain, that is, even though since 2008 I am
almost exclusively frutarian,
i.e. I eat almost exclusively only plant seeds and plant fruits and my
animals eat vegetable products all mostly from contemporary standard parasitic
rather than symbiotic plant agriculture, see my book: Symbiotic agriculture and experiments of natural science
proving Philosophy of Balance . I hope this dilemma will be solved by
longer time of my punishment of celibacy and childlessness and my
current transition, if possible, at least to plant products from organic
vegetable farming and I will have later in life a partner and a child who
during pregnancy and breastfeeding will eat from died animals exclusively safe naturally died carrions (cadavers)
of animals.
See the Bible,
New Testament, Matthew chapter 19 : 10 His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man
be so with his wife, it is not good to marry. 11 But he said unto them, All men
cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given. 12 For there are
some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some
eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of
heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.
Analogous
extreme example in nature, that Charles Darwin used as proof of alleged cruelty
of nature and of the alleged inexistence of sovereign good God, when the living
creature multiplies very mercilessly at the cost of life of other living
creatures of the same order, it is a number of parasitic ichneumon wasps or
emerald cockroach wasp,
which lay their eggs in by them cruelly bred paralyzed insect. Paralyzed
victim is changed in live food, which newborn larva of wasp eats gradually from
the inside.
According to
my natural scientific theory of evolutionary success of the individual as a
result of friendship and enmity of micro-organisms that are able to recognize
and remember their friend and their enemy, as well as a friend and an enemy of
their related micro-organisms, so at present every child is born already with
many enemies and subjected to a revenge for the death of animals cruelly died
in industrial slaughter farms to make
this child just to become born, it is a kind of original sin of this child.
To have or not
to have a wife or a girlfriend and children for the above situation when people
are parasites on animals as described above, it is not in my present opinion a
matter of personal duty of human without exception (see the Bible: “And God blessed them, and God said unto them,
Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth," (Gen 1:28), this their obligation without
exception is valid only in paradise and it will exist after any establishment
of paradise in the nature also by own forces of living creatures if possible),
but rather a matter of personal choice of human under his or her circumstances
between two more or less bad solutions.
(see
http://www.spvzt.cz/
, http://www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ , http://www.spvzt.sweb.cz/
, http://www.biblenet.cz/app/b/Matt/chapter/19
, http://www.scienceworld.cz/biologie/vosam-pri-kladeni-vajicek-do-housenek-pomaha-virus-4700/ : Pavel Houser, Vosám při kladení
vajíček do housenek pomáhá virus, 2009
, http://www.osel.cz/index.php?obsah=6&clanek=1716 : Vosička Ampulex compressa a švábí zombie, author: Stanislav Mihulka, 2006
, see genetics and especially epigenetics:
http://www.scienceworld.cz/biologie/co-je-to-epigeneticka-dedicnost-3570 : Co je to epigenetická dědičnost?, author Pavel Houser, 2002
, http://www.ceskatelevize.cz/porady/10267434268-epigenetika/ : ORIGINÁLNÍ NÁZEV Epigenetics, 43
minut, ROK VÝROBY 2009, Dokument, Titulky: Marie
Luzarová Česká televize Čtvrtek 6. 10. 2011 na
ČT2, http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetika
, http://www.wikiskripta.eu/index.php/Epigenetika
, http://www.osel.cz/index.php?clanek=1516 : Epigenetika je o tom co jíme, jak žijeme, a jak se
máme rádi, author: Josef Pazdera, 2005 , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardy-Weinberg%C5%AFv_z%C3%A1kon
, http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popula%C4%8Dn%C3%AD_genetika
http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetika , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C4%9Bdi%C4%8Dnost , http://www.imaturita.cz/maturitni-otazky/biologie/molekularni-zaklady-dedicnosti/356/ : author: Daniela Bednářová
, http://www.novinky.cz/veda-skoly/320907-fobie-mohou-byt-jen-vzpominky-zdedene-po-predcich.html : 2013, pst, Novinky , http://www.ksa.zcu.cz/podklady/bia3/Smarda_04-genetika.pdf : BIOLOGIE PRO PSYCHOLOGY A PEDAGOGY, Kapitola 4, Základy
genetiky, Šmarda, Jan a kolektiv, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weismann_barrier
. http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mem
, http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamarckismus
, http://etext.czu.cz/img/skripta/68/042_061-1.pdf : Šálek M., Růžička J. & Mandák
B. (2005), skripta Ekologie - populační dynamika, Fakulta
lesnická a environmentální, katedra
ekologie a životního prostředí , http://www.uel.cz/download/Multimedialni_ucebni_text/zivotn_%20strategie_organismu.htm : Životní strategie organismů, Ústav ekologie lesa
[online], 2007
, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilith
, http://desirabilia.blogspot.cz/2014_07_01_archive.html : Hozená rukavice antinatalismu, 2014, Jakub Moravčík
)
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 02/02/2014 06:45:51
Post:
Women as the embodiment of
snakes
According to Rational Mystique
of my Philosophy of Balance all the living creatures after death compose
various common persons with other living creatures. Women are by this mystique of my
Philosophy of Balance a tool of the Devil, or death, or the race of snakes, or
they embody snakes, however
women in fact mostly desire love, which the Devil, death, and snakes lack the
most. Many snakes are different from other animals, because they
cannot eat cadavers of living creatures, whether they died a natural death
(i.e. carrions), or they were slaughtered e.g. by a human, and currently
they must eat live prey. Currently the most merciful food for many
snakes consists in various snails and shells, it is of
evolutionarily less perfect living creatures that feel the least pain due to
their relatively low perfect nervous system. However even snakes are according
to Philosophy of Balance in perfectly infinite time designed gradually to
perfection, i.e. to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, symbolically
said even snakes are apparently God's creatures and God likes them therefore
then, so women embody the rights of the most hated living God's creatures.
Out of this nature the personal qualities for women arise, such as their generosity,
courage, lack of fear, vindictiveness, deceit, vitality, seeking for similar
brave men, predators, who do not fear them, tolerance to various sins of men
and women, self-sacrifice, desire for power, disillusion of men,
underestimating men who are more sensitive, they are not as brave and powerful
as women as the embodiment of snakes.
However for all women as the embodiment of snakes is all those in fact
accompanied by sometimes conscious (for evolutionarily more perfect women)
and sometimes unconscious (for evolutionarily less perfect women) desire for
love and to be loved as a tool of the Devil, virtually of the death, virtually as the embodiment of snakes, because they
do not enjoy killing, power, or courage and they are longing for love,
virtually they desire to return to the biblical paradise, virtually to
make it in the world especially by our own forces. I was reconciled with my
original girlfriend also, because I could not be alone anymore, even though
from the above reasons I newly accept, that currently she will eat slaughtered
organic meat, which I will not buy for her, but I will let her to buy
it in the way, that I will buy for her a merciful herbal organic food and other
merciful products such as clothing made from organic cotton and home eggs from
breeding, where hens and cocks are dying of natural death, one do not let them
to be slaughtered, in the way, that I will insist on her eating or possibly buying
only organic meat within meat, which she already performs more or less, because
at home they are breeding pigs for meat in the domestic breed and they grow the
potatoes for themselves and for the pig, even if they have little money. And
thereby we both become evolutionarily progressively more merciful, scavengers, later
pure fruitarians.
In addition I would be a
hypocrite, if currently I admit eating slaughtered organic meat for other
people and currently I did not accept it at my own girlfriend.
Literatura:
http://www.theguardian.com/science/video/2010/dec/07/snakes-snails-shells-evolution : Saved by the shell: Snakes spare snails with anti-clockwise shells, Source: Nature Communications, Tue 7 Dec 2010 , http://daimon.webzdarma.cz/textb.htm : © Daimon, O hadech , http://teraristika.chovzvirat.com/krmivo/krmeni-hadu.html : Krmivo, Krmení hadů, Krmení ještěrů (see
"Some snakes case is exactly the opposite and they do not hunt
other than living and moving food or they do not eat other than it. They do not
let to be deceived by the freshly killed or up-warmed cadaver.")
(See www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 15/02/2014 20:35:04
Post:
quoted:
Post of Dalibor Grůza
The problem of
theodicea according to the Philosophy of Balance
According to the Philosophy of Balance in terms of the
good and the evil the facts in our world can be defined as following items:
-
the Good (the God)
-
the Good Evil, i.e. the Evil of the Good (the Devil of the
God, or the Devil belonging to the God, it is a necessary
evil)
-
the imperfect Good (the God of creation, the God belonging to the creation, it is the imperfect good of people and
of other living creatures)
-
the imperfect Good Evil (the Devil of the God belonging to a
creation, it is the imperfect Devil belonging to the God, or it is an imperfect necessary
evil, or an evolutionarily-developmentally necessary evil, or what we perceive,
and according to the Philosophy of Balance, i.e. apparently, what appears
seemingly to us as a real evil contradictory to the substance of the good,
all-powerful sovereign, omnipresent God-the Good)
Literature:
See English: the Go(o)d, the God, the Evil, the (D)evil.
Teodicea (from French théodicée, from Greek theos, God
and dikaios, righteous), it means the justification of the God. It is the old
problem of philosophy and theology, and it concerns the presence of evil in the
world. The key question is, why the God, if he is omnipotent and good, commits
evil? See: http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teodicea
(see www.spvzt.cz ,
www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )
I.e. according to the
Philosophy of Balance all living creatures are the imperfect good, whether in the form of the above imperfect good or imperfect good evil (whether
a number of parasitic ichneumon wasps or emerald cockroach wasp, which lay
their eggs in by them cruelly bred paralyzed insect, paralyzed victim is changed
in live food, which newborn larva of wasp eats gradually from the inside, i.e.
the example in nature, that Charles Darwin used as proof of alleged cruelty of
nature and of the alleged inexistence of sovereign good God, or the snakes,
many of which must eat only live prey, or predators, particularly carnivorous
predators, or the monkeys or prehistoric men, whose gangs are killing each
other, or Adolf Hitler, who replaced the suffering to animals in factory farms
with suffering in particular to Jews and
Roma, or the Jews, who as in all spheres of human activity chosen people of
world leaders committed, that in today's world the people breed animals in a
slaughter factory agricultural farms or in experimental laboratories of
medicine or of cosmetics companies-current concentration camps of the animals,
although they condemn their own concentration camps, by which Adolf Hitler
apparently revenged this suffering to animals).
(see www.spvzt.cz ,
www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )
On March 13, 2014 6:30 corrected 13/06/2014,
"JUDr. Dalibor Gruza Ph.D.-lawyer" wrote:
I have found out already, what
is my major disadvantage in relation to women, I cannot even admit from my
psychological and also from my current moral reasons unlike other men to feed
my possible offspring with slaughtered animals, it is a question, whether I am
ever able to feed them,
in terms of philosophy of mercy it may be a crucial evolutionary advantage, in
terms of Darwinism it is clearly a crucial evolutionary disadvantage, my
current crucial problem is therefore, whether the Philosophy of Balance, i.e.
the philosophy of mercy or Darwinism is true, which only the future seems to
show. If I have not conceive with my
current partner a child till her age of 48 years or if she does not start to
eat till her age of 44,5 years, i.e. 3,5 years before her probable infertility
(see above) and does not persist then till her death in eating only the same as
I do, I cannot guarantee her my fidelity, but then we will still probably remain
together, because no other fertile woman will probably admit to feed our common
possible child from meat only with carrions.
Author: Dalibor
Grůza
Time: 18/08/2014 21:32:01
Post:
quoted:
Post of Dalibor Grůza 19/07/2014
My Philosophy of Balance of workable symbiosis of all
living organisms in nature is according to the majority of people considered as
highly improbable even though their attractive option, as the result others are
willing to invest in this option a lot of time and resources, if in the end
after all it succeeds. According to the majority of people it is in my case
very probably a futile experiment, which must end eventually by a total
failure, because the nature is outside the family and often even inside the
family cruel, even if they do not like it. As I am not predatory, because I
could not stand mentally or physically this cruelty, the majority of women is
not willing to risk having a child with me and they would not eat slaughtered
animals, from the required dead animals they would eat only carrions that died
of natural causes, principally of old age. Therefore highly probably according
to the majority of people I will die childless and therefore, if others
followed my Philosophy of Balance, so living organisms would become extinct
highly probably according to these people. Thus my Philosophy of Balance cannot
be followed probably according to the majority of people, although probably due
to it, which according to me partially proves it and up to now justifies it for
me, I succeed in stabilization of my serious health condition up to now, even
if the stabilization seemed in terms of health statistics previously highly
improbable, further in being above-average successful in my professional life
and in getting above-average property. However according to the majority of
people it is highly probably transient and unrepeatable phenomenon that stems
from the fact, that others are willing to invest in verifying of my Philosophy
of Balance as the above mentioned most attractive option a lot of time and
resources, although it appears to them to be highly improbable in the unmerciful
nature. Therefore now the main question
is, whether respecting of my Philosophy of Balance as the law of mercy to all
living organisms ensures me a success in the rest of my life, nowadays
especially if I succeed in having children with my partner, and they would not
eat slaughtered animals.
I have no greater certainty, that the Philosophy of
Balance is true, than the above justifying experiences, if I want to get a
wife, so I should not let know any of my anxiety from the stress while making
decisions based on the Philosophy of Balance. The most merciful diet, as possible i.e.
on principle organic frutarianism and eggs from a home breed, where they do not
slaughter or get slaughtered any hens and cocks I eat minimally since 25 May
2013, when my partner was about exactly 41 years old and I was about 40 years
old. If the Philosophy of Balance is valid, so the friendship of the world
living microorganisms ensures me, that in the future I have the potential
partner and potential offspring, who would not eat slaughtered animals, from
the required dead animals they would eat only carrions that died of natural
causes, principally of old age. As in
7 years from 25 May 2013, if I continue to follow the above most merciful way of
food as possible, the living cells will change completely in my body and in 3,5
years of this time half of the living cells in my body will apparently change
(see above), therefore in the first case of this period all living microorganisms
in the world and in the second case of this period the vast majority of living
organisms in the world will be my friends and they arrange it, so that in the
future I gain the potential partner and potential offspring, who would not eat
slaughtered animals, from the required dead animals they would eat only carrions
that died of natural causes, principally of old age. Ideally in the last moment
I can accomplish it with my current partner, for whom from 25 May 2013
exactly 7 years remain till her infertility and 3.5 years till the need to
change her diet and to eat only the same as I do. Otherwise the Philosophy of Balance is not valid.
Literature: Elliot Katz, Being
The Strong Man A Woman Wants, Práh 2008, first edition, Příběhy Tóry Patnáct
biblických zamyšlení, Jan Divecký, nakladatelství P3K, 2005, Everyman's Talmud The Major Teachings of the Rabbinic Sages,
Abraham Cohen, Sefer s.r.o., 2006, http://blogeurabia.parlamentnilisty.cz/Blog/joanjjoanj/Print/1023-talmud-ideologii-zbaveny.aspx : Talmud ideologií zbavený, author: joan.j joan.j, 2011
, http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1375&whichpage=52 : Ráj začíná vědeckým pokusem na mé zahradě
9. Prognosis
of the future of World politics and of political Party for the Rights of All
Living Creatures http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1655 : Fil. experiment-Strana za práva všech živých tvorů
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 10/02/2013 09:26:15 corrected 06/09/2013
Post:
- Death and pain of
living creatures, in particular livestock caused by modern agricultural factory
farming must be compensated by similarly high death and pain caused to responsible
people in the future. It follows future revenge of the tortured to death and
their related micro-organisms in the form of the insolvency of the banks (under
the law of the European Union it is supposed to be 75% of the assets managed by
the banks formed by sooner or later worthless Government bonds of sooner or
later over-indebted States of the European Union), economic crisis, war inciting,
arms race and wars or the collapse of the currencies and the general misery,
mutatis mutandis, as was the case during the great depression during the onset
of fascism in the 20th century.
It can be assumed that, as a result of the economic crisis we are directed to
the collapse of the Western international integrity in today's democratic base
and the emergence of a number of smaller local powers apparently disposing
nuclear weapons controlling only their immediate surroundings, these smaller power
States will be often based on dictatorship, like fascist or worse Nazi States
of the twentieth century. German Nazism has in the program eco-fascism,
therefore a great protection of animal welfare and organic farming, which is reflected
also in the program of today's far right.
- To compensate for the above great death and pain of living creatures
in the suffering of responsible people with which any of the above local powers
and dictatorial States arising after the above today and expected future global
economic crisis could learn, acquire compassion and enact the slaughter tax and
start the regrowth of the economy and the reunification of the whole
international community.
- In the above turning point of learning of the suffering of the responsible
people previous education of the slaughter tax must be available.
- The slaughter tax brings the largest profit only in the long term, in the
short term it is less acceptable for the people, it is difficult to understand
and to explicate, and therefore the above education cannot be in the form of a
shock, but based on a long-term and fair explanation that there is plenty of
informed people in the above turning point.
- People, who have long-term compliance with the obligation to cause the
least possible death and pain, will live also in the aforementioned crisis like
in the biblical paradise.
- If we understand all living creatures as predators or parasites (see
Satanism), then peace is possible in the world only as in the Roman Empire (see
violent order maintained by the pack of leader predators on a large territory),
according to the Philosophy of Balance with the prognosis of development as in
the Roman Empire (i.e. large amount of deadly enemies and progressive
degeneration of the pack of leader predators increasing their effeminacy, i.e.
combat disability).
(see http://www.spvzt.cz/ , http://www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ , http://www.spvzt.sweb.cz/ )
10. The
legal rights of viruses, bacteria and parasites in general, by SPVŽT
How do we have treated the
rights of viruses, bacteria and parasites in general? Or we are denying their
rights to life? ...
Dalibor Grůza: ...Rights of
the viruses and bacteria have been treated at least of all, because it is the evolutionarily
simplest known organism, that almost do not sense pain, yet even in their case,
our aim would not be their extinction. The aim of the ideology of the Party for
the Rights of All Living Creatures (SPVŽT) in relation to the parasites in general
is not to extinct all parasites, because it would be inconsistent with the main
ideological duty of each to the constant causing the least possible death and
pain, but the ideological aim of SPVŽT in relation to parasites in general,
is a well known principle in biology, that a successful parasite is one that
does not kill its host, ideological goal is, therefore, generally speaking, the
symbiosis between the parasites and other live creatures.
...
Dalibor Grůza: It depends on
if I have in my hair one louse, then it apparently has the right to life in my
hair, or if there will be a thousand of them, then I must apparently extinct
them, on the other hand, parasites generally always react on their killing to
their excessive reproduction and their resistance against extinctive resources also
increases. So even due to parasites in general by me, there are above two ways,
the war on life and death, or symbiosis.
...
see http://www.facebook.com/dalibor.gruza
#!/pages/side-for-all-living-creatures/133671120130073
11. Good adviser,
or solicitor and his or her client http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1655 : Fil. experiment-Strana za práva všech živých tvorů
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 26/03/13 04:49:58
Post:
...
A good adviser, or solicitor should advise a client on how to be a good,
religiously speaking, belong to God (the words of dobrý-good and Bůh-God have
the same language origin, in English such as the consonant root of G-D, dobrý-good,
Bůh-God). The good of the client means to me the balance of considerations
of justice, of mighty and of love or mercy in the affairs of a client. Focusing
only on one of the above aspects of good of client and his or her adviser is
not good, in particular, in the long run for the client nor for his or her adviser
and, in particular, in the long term it is punished by nature, and its
evolution from my natural theory about the ability of all micro-organisms to
recognize and remember the friend and the enemy. In other words, treasurer
(religiously speaking, similar to the Lord - Treasurer, in English spoken
judge, Lord of hosts, i.e. of all living creatures, from the Russian word
gosudar - Treasurer, composed from “go”, probably from the Latin word host, see
in Czech nebeské zástupy - in English the hosts - army of heaven and “sudar”,
or judge), who is only just and they are not mighty and merciful, or the treasurer,
who is only powerful and not just and merciful, or treasurer, who is only
merciful and not mighty and just, are bad treasurers-landlords, not like the
Lord.
An example of bad advice was
apparently present ecclesiastical restitution in the Czech Republic, where the
Church and the Government parties chose apparently only the aspect of power,
without apparently sufficiently taking into account the aspect to be merciful,
and just to all the people of our State.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz )
12. The question of Judaism from the viewpoint of Philosophy of Balance http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1655 : Fil. experiment-Strana za práva všech živých tvorů
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 28/06/13 10:22:47
Post:
The Jews are the chosen
people, because apparently thanks to their the most merciful diet of all people
in earlier times (see Old Testament relationship to animals and Kosher
slaughter) they perfected genetically, so that they were in an unusually large
part of their population the leading group of all people, virtually of this world
managed by people, in all spheres of human activity. Be a leader, however, is
not only the advantage, it's a huge responsibility for much in excess of the
liability of the average member of human society, the beloved leader of the pack
of wolves will be protected by a pack of wolves at the cost of their own lives,
the hateful leader of the pack of wolves the pack of wolves will eventually eat
alive after his defeat by another wolf. The cause of anti-Semitism in modern
times so I can see, in that the society, led by the Jews in modern times, in
addition to leaders from other nations, is causing a huge amount of unnecessary
death and pain, in particular of other living creatures than humans (Old
Testament relation to living creatures and Kosher slaughter are not the most
merciful as possible for a long time), thereby the Jews cause according to
Philosophy of Balance huge amount of their deadly enemies and hatred from the killed
ones and their relatives live micro-organisms that are, from evolutionary
reasons, part of the bodies of all living creatures and also of people, and
thus it also initiated their anti-Semitism. Because of by the Jews led modern-times
society caused the great death and pain, in particular of other living
creatures than humans the anti-Semites, in turn, celebrate the great death and pain
caused to these Jews.
My personal attitude towards
Jews is as follows: the initiated anti-Semitism is in me because of the great
death and pain, caused by modern-times society led by Jews, of other living
creatures than humans, in particular of animals. At the same time, however, Jews
as leaders of human society are very close to me as a philosopher and lawyer,
i.e. as the leading scientific member of the human society, I have a very
strong emotional collegial relationship to them. If there will be no change to the current state of the human society,
then from my Philosophy of Balance a future revenge on the Jews for a large
number of martyred and their relatives living micro-organisms, in particular of
animals, implies, thus the future great emergence of dictatorships and anti-Semitism
in the world. Even me as a body made up of, inter alia, those live
micro-organisms I will have a subconscious visceral pleasure from this
vengeance and extermination of the Jews in the future. But from my Philosophy
of Balance it implies, that, if I do not want to be like them – Jews, I have to
still cause the least possible death and pain, and even of the Jews, therefore,
I have to protect the Jews and to help them as far as possible against these by
me expected their great death and pain in conflict with this my subconscious
visceral pleasure of vengeance caused to Jews.
The leaders of other nations
are from the viewpoint of living microorganisms more protected against the above
revenge by genetic relatedness to the led nation or by lower frequency of these
leaders in relation to their nation.
The above is the interpretation
of the Bible Deuteronomy 28,58-69, in terms of Philosophy of Balance:
58 If thou wilt not observe to
do all the words of this law that are written in this book, that thou mayest
fear this glorious and fearful name, The Lord Thy God; 59 Then the Lord will
make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues,
and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance. 60
Moreover he will bring upon thee all the diseases of Egypt, which thou wast
afraid of; and they shall cleave unto thee. 61 Also every sickness, and every
plague, which is not written in the book of this law, them will the Lord bring
upon thee, until thou be destroyed. 62 And ye shall be left few in number,
whereas ye were as the stars of heaven for multitude; because thou wouldest not
obey the voice of the Lord thy God. 63
And it shall come to pass, that as the Lord rejoiced over you to do you good,
and to multiply you; so the Lord will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to
bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou
goest to possess it.
64 And the Lord shall scatter
thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and
there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have
known, even wood and stone. 65 And among these nations shalt thou find no ease,
neither shall the sole of thy foot have rest: but the Lord shall give thee
there a trembling heart, and failing of eyes, and sorrow of mind: 66 And thy
life shall hang in doubt before thee; and thou shalt fear day and night, and
shalt have none assurance of thy life: 67 In the morning thou shalt say, Would
God it were even! and at even thou shalt say, Would God it were morning! for
the fear of thine heart wherewith thou shalt fear, and for the sight of thine
eyes which thou shalt see. 68 And the Lord shall bring thee into Egypt again with
ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again:
and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no
man shall buy you. 69[29,1] These are the words of the covenant, which the Lord commanded Moses to make with the children of Israel in the land of
Moab, beside the covenant which he made with them in Horeb..
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz )
13.
Romany politics according to the Philosophy of Balance http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1655 : Fil. experiment-Strana za práva všech živých tvorů
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 31/08/2013 20:57:30
Post:
The only Romany politics, which was successful, was in
the framework of the pre-war Slovakia, which was manifested by the position of
the Slovaks on gypsies during the fascist Slovak State. While all the Jews were
released by the Slovak fascists to concentration camps, in Slovakia almost all
gypsies survived the period of fascism and the holocaust, without the Slovaks
releasing them to Hitler´s concentration camps. The base for this in the
history unique success of the Romany politics in Slovakia was, that in Slovakia
in the vicinity of the poor Romany settlement there was always richer village
of Slovak farmers, where each richer Slovak farmer had under the patronage one
poor Romany family. To this patronage Romany family the richer farmer gave remains
of his or her economy and for that his or her patronage Romany family
guaranteed that no one steals the crop on the fields of Slovak farmer-patron.
In addition, that the fields were guarded, so in the case, that a theft had
occurred, so this patronage Romany family was obliged to denounce to a richer
Slovak farmer-patron the offender, who was then sentenced to prison. Although
the Romany settlement held together, it had a strict hierarchy, that they chose
to denounce, in principle, a kind of scapegoat, often into Romany settlement
from outside married Romany men or gadjo (non-Romani), who stood in the
hierarchy in the Romany settlement the lowest, so the thefts on the fields of
the Slovak richer village were only in exceptional cases. Further patronage
Romany family helped a little to his or her richer Slovak farmer-patron, but
not too much, because the gypsy, who is not like the gadjo (non-Romani),
considers work as dishonorable and he or she better does not work, when he or
she need not.
When in Slovakia and in Europe the fascism won, so
every Slovak farmer, how he or she could the most, protected his or her
patronage Romany family. The result was that in Slovakia about 99% of gypsies
survived the holocaust in the relative safety during the Second World War. For
example, to deceive Hitler and his Romany murdering politics the Slovak State
enacted some sort of discriminatory laws against gypsies who may not be moving,
however, no one respected these laws in real life in Slovakia. This can stand
against the Holocaust of the gypsies in Bohemia and Moravia, where the Czechs
collaborated much with the Nazis in murders of Czech gypsies, and nearly all of
the Czech gypsies were killed here, if during protectorate of Bohemia and
Moravia the Czech Romany doctoral family of Holomeks wanted to save their life,
so they had to ran away to relatives in Slovakia. Whereas in the Holocaust
almost all Czech gypsies were massacred by Nazis, today's Czech gypsies are the
descendants of those who moved here from Slovakia after the war, and the proof
is that all gypsies in the Czech Republic speak Slovak Romani.
The second source of Romany politics according to the
Philosophy of Balance is the Romany culture. The Romany fairy tales are very
cruel, one of such Romany fairy tales tells the story of stupid good gadjo
(non-Romani), who wanted to be friend with the clever gypsy. Stupid good gadjo
went to the market with a cow, he met the clever gypsy, with whom he started to
want to be friend, first the clever gypsy stole from him the cow, then all the
money and then he picked out him his eyes and he left him to his fate.
From the above-mentioned
sources there are the following principles of the Romany politics towards
gypsies, who have not regular employment or do not practise business or do not
regularly go to school (gypsies, who have regular employment or do some business
or go to school regularly, do not need the below patronage or protection and
they are completely equal in the level of socialization with gadjos, i.e.
non-Romani), according to the Philosophy of Balance:
- Giving gypsies the minimum
social benefits just, so that their families would survive, with the widest
possible State retraining and State school education also in later life, but
not to let them die of hunger, thirst, cold, or from lack of health care.
- At the same time, each gadjo
(non-Romani) family in the vicinity of a Romany settlement should have under
the patronage one of Romany families, which would guarantee, that the gypsies
from a Romany settlement will not commit against this patron non-Romany family any
criminal activity, otherwise they would have to denounce and help convict the
offender or they are being cut down on the above social benefits.
- Patronage non-Romany gadjo
family should have the obligation to do everything to guarantee the patronage
Romany family, that they did not die of hunger, thirst, cold or lack of health
care in spite of low social benefits. They could for example assist them in the
negotiations with the competent authorities or by the advices.
- I recommend, that the
patronage gadjo family is not befriended as an equal with its patronage Romany
family, but always there would be the relationship of the superior non-Romany
patron and Romany client family.
- Unemployed gypsies on the
above low social benefits should be guaranteed by the law for their work, if
they make some extra money, fair wages, to learn to appreciate the work and to
recover, and not to exploit them, and so regardless of the specificities of the
Romany work, here I am mainly referring to the uncertain attendance of gypsies
into employment.
Source of information on the Romany culture and
history: Sources of the Museum of Romany culture, Bratislavská 67, 60200 Brno,
which I visited about 2-3 years ago, I studied and earned information there.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz
)
14.
Educational politics according to the Philosophy of Balance http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1655 : Fil. experiment-Strana za práva všech živých tvorů
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 20/09/2013 08:57:31
Post:
The main aim of education
should be to educate towards the mercy of everyone in the society. Intelligence
of society members represents the wealth of society, which is to be used in the
context of the necessary extensive system of quality State education of society
members even in the case of
the poor members of society, at the same time it allows also to clever, i.e. on
principal to more sensitive members of the society to take a beneficial place
in society even due to their sensitivity. The society member, that gets
education for free or inexpensively, should recognize, that they obtained their
education for free or inexpensively, which does not serve to robbing the
society of living creatures, but primarily for their benefit, i.e. for the
relatively cheap service to society. In contrast the expensive, in particular
higher education leads to the waste of the society's cleverness in case of its
poor members and to expensive service to society by the educated members of
society.
Therefore basic and secondary State education should
be for free, because it is used by almost all people in society, and the State
higher education at a cost of up to 10.000,-CZK per year of study at the
University in relation to any field of higher education, this price, though
apparently far from covering the cost of this education, would serve as a
motivational element, that the State University study was not abused. At the
same time the State should provide interest-free loans, increased only about
inflation on the cost of higher education for the poor members of society,
which the student was obliged to repay only if they achieve a certain
predetermined amount of their income. At
the same time as today the main universal aspect of the admission to a State
school should be to meet at the best the learning potentials of this school by
a member of the society, not their ability to pay for this study.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz )
15.
Collective responsibility and vaccination against viruses http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1655 : Fil. experiment-Strana za práva všech živých tvorů
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 28/09/2013 20:49:15
Post:
Related living cells (i.e. for example people) are
cooperating genetic groups, if according to my hypothesis any living cell
recognizes and remembers the enemy in a living cell, which or of which group
causes a lot of unnecessary (i.e. much more than the least possible) death and
pain (for example a certain person), so the
enmity, virtually hatred of injured living cell and its relative living cells extends
also to the genetically relative living cells of the damaging living cell with
decreasing force by the distance of the relationship (i.e. for example an evil
human, his or her family, his or her nation or all people) and they revenge
also on those living cells with decreasing force by the distance of their relationship.
In my opinion this is the basis of collective responsibility in society, which
could be described as a liability (i.e. punishment or reward) of individual for
the conduct of its group and group liability for the conduct of its individual,
both while requiring according to my Philosophy of Balance to perform steady
obligation of everyone to cause the least possible death and pain.
Example of the above-mentioned collective
responsibility is such, that humans produce vaccines against viruses of fatal,
incurable diseases such as rabies, so that these viruses are grown in tissue
culture, thus live cells grown extracorporeally. These living cells of tissue
cultures are fed essentially inter alia also by fetal bovine serum, which means
blood serum from the fetus of bled calf separated from the cow in the late
stage of her pregnancy, during which both the fetus and the pregnant cow are
often killed, which is terrible, but less terrible than, when human dies for
example of rabies. This fetal bovine serum is the best food for tissue cultures,
which is currently used. This fetal bovine serum can be probably always replaced
by serum from the blood of live animals, such as newborn or young calf, which are
bled (letting the vein), without having to kill them. However in the present also
that serum is obtained from a slaughterhouse blood of slaughtered newborn bulls
which are not worth continuing to feed and breed for the current farmers,
because they do not give milk. This blood would otherwise have ended up in the
waste stream during bleeding of newborn bulls slaughtered for their meat to be
sold in stores of contemporary human society.
This means, that although we use
vaccine against viruses not using fetal bovine serum but bovine serum, we bear
the above-mentioned collective responsibility for that the blood serum is not extracted
without killing an animal, but killing a newborn bull in slaughterhouses. To
reduce the penalty of that our collective responsibility we must fight, inter
alia, for the enactment of the by me proposed Act on slaughter tax to pay off to
feed and breed also newborn bulls to their natural death without the
intentional killing by any human, in order that those vaccines used blood serum
obtained by letting the vein without killing the newborn or young bulls.
An even better
solution is probably non-animal serum, because according to the
notice of DVM. Jan Dolezal jan.dolezal@merck.com from Intervet
s.r.o. a subsidiary of Merck
& Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA as "maintenance
medium" in the production of Nobivac Rabies vaccine , which is one of the
most effective on the market - revaccination every three years, anything of
animal origin is not used, because according to the notice of technical manager
of the parent company from USA: The
previous medium we used for producing the rabies antigen contained various
substances of animal origin; tryptose and lactalbumin hydrolysate (both contain
milk derivatives) and bovine serum albumin. The veggie medium we now use
contains none of these animal-derived components. We cannot of course supply
specific formulation details of the veggie medium as this is commercially
confidential information. Certain doubts may occur only that, according
to perhaps outdated technical information (see Literature listed below), on the
other hand, most tissue cultures grow in serum-free media worse than in the
media with serum. Often it is also necessary to "accustom" to grow
cell culture in serum-free medium" - the cells are first cultured in a
conventional media with serum and then the medium is gradually replaced by the
media with low serum and serum-free medium. Among other the company Merck &
Co. produces also vaccines against viruses in human medicine. Vaccination of dog
at a vet in the Czech Republic against rabies is about 200, - CZK, 1 dose of
vaccine Nobivac Rabies about 35, - CZK, 1 dose of other merciful vaccine CANVAC
R-annual revaccination from DYNTEC s.r.o., apparently not produced from bovine
fetal serum but from bovine (blood) serum, is about 9, - CZK.
A similar example of above collective responsibility
is, if in the present human society the human earns money from us and this
human uses products from slaughtered animals, this provision of necessary
earnings is now in many cases the least possible harm.
Note: The above problem with the blood serum does not arise
for a vaccine against the bacteria that are cultured on agar medium, which is a
plant product.
Literature:
http://spisy.upv.cz/Patents/FullDocuments/226/226097.pdf : ÚŘAD PRŮMYSLOVÉHO VLASTNICTVÍ, Praha,
autor vynálezu: Michl Jiří RNDr. CSc., Praha,
Novotný Josef, Kostelec nad Černými leay,
zveřejněno 29.7.1983, vydáno 1.6.1986, Živné
prostředí pro buněčné a
tkáňové kultury obsahující
růstové proteiny krevního séra
, http://biologie-v-kostce.blogspot.cz/2011/05/243-kultivacni-podminky.html
, http://3pol.cz/1101/print : TŘIPÓL e-zin popelarizující vědu a techniku,
Medicína a přírodověda, Vepřový
řízek ze zkumavky, 2011, Zdroj: Nature, 9 December 2010, Vol
468, str. 752 až 753, Edita Bromová, http://www.nechybujte.cz/ : Lingea s.r.o., Brno , http://www.biotech.cz/cz/eshop/katalog/4472/sera : BioTech a.s., Praha 10, (Fetální bovinní) sérum
, http://bioprojekty.lf1.cuni.cz/3381/sylaby-prednasek/textova-verze-prednasek/bunecne-kultury-vejrazka.pdf : Buněčné kultury, Martin Vejražka, Ústav
lékařské biochemie, 1.
lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Praze, http://is.muni.cz/th/101933/prif_b/bakalarska_prace.txt : Masarykova univerzita, Přírodovědecká fakulta,
Oddělení genetiky a molekulární
biologie, REGULACE PLURIPOTENCE U NORMÁLNÍCH A
ADAPTOVANÝCH LIDSKÝCH
EMBRYONÁLNÍCH KMENOVÝCH BUNĚK, Brno
2008, Hana Zmrzlá, http://www.dokapsy.cz/vzteklina/ : ANONYM. Vzteklina [online]
, http://www.cmku.cz/soubory/dokumenty/300_seznam_schvalenych_vakcin_proti_vztekline.pdf : ČESKOMORAVSKÁ KYNOLOGICKÁ UNIE, http://www.viamilkcz.cz/documents/obchodni_cinnost/cenik_veterinarnich_lecivych_pripravku_platny_od_9_7_2012.pdf : ČESKOMORAVSKÁ SPOLEČNOST CHOVATELŮ, a.s. , http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vzteklina#L.C3.A9.C4.8Dba_a_progn.C3.B3za_u_lid.C3.AD
, http://www.wikiskripta.eu/index.php/R%C5%AFstov%C3%BD_faktor
, http://bioprojekty.lf1.cuni.cz/3381/sylaby-prednasek/bunecne-kultury.pdf : Synopse přednášky, BUNĚČNÉ KULTURY, MUDr. Martin Vejražka, http://www.hedvabnastezka.cz/help-camp/8963-ani-moderni-medicina-neumi-vylecit-vzteklinu/ : v rubrice ZDRAVÍ, Docent MUDr. Rastislav Maďar, Ph.D.
(see www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz )
16. Whom did
I vote in the parliamentary elections in October 2013? http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1708 : Koho budu volit v parlamentních volbách říjen 2013
According to the steady duty
of everyone according to my Philosophy of Balance to cause the least possible
death and pain the mankind can avoid radical retribution for our causing of the
great unnecessary (i.e. a lot bigger than the smallest possible) death and
pain, especially to animals only by radical limitation of this needless death
and pain.
Therefore, I voted for the Green Party, namely by circling of the
vegetarians in the Green Party ticket in the constituency of South Moravian
region, and those are:
2. RNDr. Mojmír Vlašín 58 Brno (he eats only overpopulated animals shot by
hunters in the forest, he does not eat slaughtered animals from industrial
agricultural farms, my note from my own findings)
Environmentalist, lecturer,
expert witness
6. Mgr. Martin Ander, Ph.D. 38 Brno (vegetarian for 20 years, my note from my
own findings)
Teacher, mathematician, Member of the Municipal Council of the city of Brno
10. Mgr. Michal Rezek 37 Dolní Loučky (vegetarian, my note from my own
findings)
Manager of the audit firm.
The Green Party is not ideal for me, because it combines the protection of
animals in the program with a lot of unnecessary clutter, the majority of the
members does not have compassion for animals, maybe at least for people
and they are not vegetarians, they reacted very negatively to my proposal of
the slaughter tax, as a member of the Green Party.
Yet at present the vegetarians of
the Green party are according to me the only hope to avoid revenge of martyred
animals in industrial agricultural farms in the form of by me expected collapse
of Western economies, the fall of the Western democracy and the rise of fascism
and Nazism in the Western world, and to the constitution of by me founded Party
for the Rights of All Living Creatures, advocating the slaughter tax in each
State of the world.
The Program of Green Party
includes marginally also passages of the protection of animals:
We will increase the availability of meals without animal products. We want
to make such a diet was well available in all schools, factories and public
canteens, hospitals, social care institutions, prisons and other facilities. In
the establishments operated by the public administration we establish the
obligation of the availability of one vegetarian dish.
We recognize the right of individuals to the free decision about eating habits.
Vegetarianism or veganism often stems from a substantive change in belief or
religion. Moreover, livestock production is a major ecological burden and some
of its practices are also ethical problem.
Livestock production requires three times more space than intensive crop.
Livestock farms emit one fifth of global greenhouse gas production, which is
more than all the cars, ships and planes produce. These farms also produce
large quantities of fecal pollution. It is also problematic overuse of
fertilizer for the production of feeding stuffs for animals; feed (primarily
corn and soy) are, moreover, very often genetically modified, without the end
customer has had the opportunity to find out. Corn and soy are frequently
imported into the Czech Republic from Argentina and Brazil, where their
cultivation is causing irreversible damages.
The worldwide increasing demand for livestock products is colliding with the
available biological capacity. For these reasons, we welcome any efforts to
limit the consumption of animal products and we support sustainable ways of
eating, that is trying to limit or to exclude animal products altogether, such
as vegetarianism and veganism.
However we do not and we will not impose a diet of the people with the
exclusion of certain products. We only effectively allow their choice and
inform about its usefulness. Well proportioned vegetable diet can provide
everything for the body needs, and may also be effective in preventing many
civilization diseases.
We significantly strengthen and increase effect of support of organic
agriculture and organic food. We promote local organic food production, that
ecological agriculture was significant reservoir of healthy foods and not just
a consumer of its subsidies. We offer organic food in school canteens,
hospitals, medical and social institutions, and State institutions.
Development of organic farming
we support by tax advantages at organic food. We support the development of
innovative concepts (eg. Harvested, community farming etc.). In addition to the
quantity of food it is necessary to put emphasis on their quality, for the
protection and harmonious development of the countryside and to ensure better
living conditions for animals.
Organic farming is one of the means for sustainable development, therefore we
support the development of organic farms and theo increase of the share of ecological agriculture on the
total area of agricultural land. The majority of organic food has come from
imports; therefore we will support the production of local organic food that
the Czech agriculture does not lose not unnecessarily the opportunity.
We keep the obligation that the municipality takes care of abandoned animals
and animal shelters.
Shelters for abandoned animals have a problem coping with the increase in
abandoned animals, they lack the capacity, qualified personnel and finances.
Shelters so often are not capable of receiving the animals from other catchment
areas or from private finders. The existing legislation provides that a
municipality is obliged to finance the placement and stay of the animal at the
shelter. If the animal does not find the owner within six months, the owner
becomes the municipality. In the case of tortured animals the municipality
provides the alternate location of the tortured animal.
The municipality is sometimes trying to avoid this obligation and favors the
economic interests before the ethical. The Greens disagree with the proposal to
shorten the six-month period, after which the municipality is obliged to take
care of the animal and the cost of care. While we do not agree with the
proposal that the municipality had been the law free from compulsory funding of
shelters, such a step would be for shelters de facto the liquidation.
We propose to extend the grant
of subsidies for the operation of shelters and at the same time, we will
support the proposal on areal castration of stray animals, especially cats,
provided that it is in the interests of animal welfare, in order to avoid an
increase in the number of stray animals. At the same time to support projects
for the creation of rescue centers for sick and handicapped pets.
We reject the attempts and the
testing of cosmetics on animals, we encourage the introduction of alternative
methods of testing in the industry, science and medicine.
We also want to make better use of the European Centre for the validation of
alternative methods, more supported research of these methods and their
implementation in practice. We agree with the European ban on the testing of
cosmetics and we demand that it covered even the testing of products for the
home. We support the modern and reliable alternatives to experiments on
animals, such as computer models, cell cultures, molecular methods, samples of
human tissues, studies on volunteers, population studies and organs of already
dead animals.
Under the legislation, an alternative method should be used as soon as it is
approved. In practice, however, this regulation is seen as an alternative to be
used at the moment when it is internationally recognized and commonly available
(which takes a number of years). Another problem is the fact that the
development of new alternative methods and their implementation in practice is
not financially enough supported.
We will enforce a ban on the use of wild species of animals for performances
in circuses and variety shows. We do not agree to the registration of circuses
with animals on the list of intangible cultural heritage of UNESCO.
Dressage and performing of
wild animals in circuses is already banned in Belgium, Austria, the
Netherlands, Hungary, Slovenia and the UK. In Greece, then apply a complete ban
on the use of animals in circuses. In the Czech Republic the circuses use for
their performances as wild animals as domesticated animals. However, these
animals in circuses are living in poor and degrading conditions.
The animals are proven to
suffer from stress and behavioral disorders. Dressage, which is carried out on
all the circus animals almost from birth, includes violence and coercion
against the animals, often even corporal punishments or withholding of food.
Circuses does not meet the educational function, because they show to children
animals in unnatural conditions and their unnatural behavior, which is invoked
when the stress and fear of punishment. Children receive biased information
about the fact that the animals are doing everything voluntarily or as a
reward. Attempts to write to UNESCO are rather evidence that Czech circus loses
the attractiveness, reducing their attendance and looking for ways to keep
circuses with animals in the Czech Republic.
We cancel the statutory exception to the protection of animals against
cruelty, which allows the slaughter of animals without prior stunning from
religious reasons.
A complete ban on ritual slaughter of animals by the law already established
Poland, Switzerland, Sweden, Latvia and Iceland. In other European countries,
such as Belgium and the Netherlands there is the legislative process for the
adoption of such a law.
The Greens support the freedom
of religion and respect religious customs, but also support the right of
animals to a dignified and painless life, which prevails over religious
practices. The stunning of the animal before slaughter is legally ordered due
to animal suffering. Nowadays, we consider such practices to the slaughter of
animals for unethical and unjustifiable.
In the framework of the common
agricultural policy (CAP) of the EU we will promote farming with higher levels
of well-being (welfare) of the animals. We establish a ban on the transport of
animals for slaughter at a distance greater than 300 kilometers and a ban on
their movement through the territory of the Czech Republic. We establish a
complete ban on breeding fur animals in the Czech Republic.
We want to eliminate the exceptions in the Act on the protection of animals
concerning farm animals, which allows castration without anesthesia, teeth
cutting, dehorning, amputations of tails, burning beaks, etc. We improve the
living conditions in the breeding of dairy cows by standardizing their
protection. We promote measures to assist to a gradual transition from
intensive livestock production to sustainable and humane methods of livestock
farming.
We propose that the so-called farm animals were slaughtered as close to their
original breeding or rearing and transports of animals were as short as
possible up to a distance of 300 kilometers. Current status allows you to
transport live animals through the territory of many countries after dozens of
hours in harsh conditions. Fur animals are forced to live in completely
unnatural even drastic conditions, where they cannot fulfill even the most
basic necessities. Taking into account all the negative externalities, the fur
trade, fur production shows such as totally inefficient.
Literature: the nominee of the
Green Party in the South and other regions: http://www.zeleni.cz/jihomoravsky-kraj/ : česká Strana zelených, http://www.zeleni.cz/program-zdrave-prostredi-kvalitni-potraviny-zdrava-krajina-cisty-vzduch/ : česká Strana zelených
17. Why to participate in, virtually not to avoid politics! http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1708 : Koho budu volit v parlamentních volbách říjen 2013
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 16/10/2013 16:14:54
Post:
Politics can cause many bad things but also a lot of good. If you want to
save a human or an animal such as tortured in the current industrial
agricultural factory farms or other one living creature, you can do it
yourself, if you want, however, to save all, you can do it only in politics, the worst thing is, that the politics can cause, however, also a large
number of their unnecessary killing or their great unnecessary pain. If a
merciful human does not participate in, virtually avoids politics, so he or she
gives space, that politics cause a number of unnecessary (i.e. more than the
least possible) death and pain.
(see www.spvzt.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz
, www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
)
18. Differences and sameness in objective value of all living creatures http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1676 : 18. Rozdíly a shoda v objektivní hodnotě všech živých tvorů
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 02/03/2013 06:42:30
Post:
kirmakX6on
According to me you are right
that every living creature has the same objective value that they have the
potential to be a perfect neighbor to all living creatures, and different
objective value according to how well they perform a steady duty of all living
creatures to cause the least possible amount of death and pain, therefore according
to the amount of by them caused death and pain and the amount of pain and
death, which they saved from living creatures, or in other words, it is a
quantitative ratio of their real enemies and real friends among the living
creatures, or even in other words to get back to your interpretation it is
their developmental stage of their potential to be a perfect neighbor to all
living creatures.
(see www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz
, www.spvzt.cz
, www.spvzt.sweb.cz
)
19.
Position of Philosophy of Balance on racism http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1664 : jsem rasista?
Author: Dalibor Grůza
Time: 06/01/2013 14:33:42
Post:
(quoted from
http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1664&whichpage=2 jsem rasista?
)
quoted:
Post of Dalibor Grůza
Axel,
all modern humans are probably derived evolutionarily
from the same small group of people from Africa, from where our ancestors set
out around the world, which archeology and genetics found out. These our
ancestors had probably all black skin adapted to bright African sun. The
whitening of the skin of Europeans was caused then by their genetic adaptation
to the lack of sunshine in Europe compared to Africa, white skin is sensitive
to the sun, also a smaller amount of sunlight can be more perfectly used for
the benefit of the body by it than black skin, the aim is to protect the body
against the bright sun.
Literature: http://www.novinky.cz/veda-skoly/286446-nejvetsimi-mutanty-na-zemi-jsou-evropane-odhaluje-nova-studie.html : 2012, pst, Novinky
Axel,
... question is, whether it is wrong to be racist. In
terms of evolutionary science it is the question of monogenism, thus the origin
of all the people from a small group of related people, virtually monkeys and
polygenism, thus the origin of different races from different groups of
monkeys. Then at polygenism there is a question of the quality of different
groups of our ancestors, i.e. value of different races. The monogenist was apparently also
Charles Darwin and it is a prevailing view in contemporary evolutionary natural
science. The polygenist was also the German evolutionist Ernst Haeckel, who was
also the inspiration of many Nazis. The Nazis understood then an evolution of
humans as purely Darwinian battle among the human races of different origin for
survival in history.
The solution is not according
to me a tendency either to polygenism as contemporary evolutionary Nazis, virtually
Neo-Nazis do nor to monogenism, also monogenism does not solve the problem of
Darwinian-based historical struggle for survival among different races
regardless of the fact, that in history they have possibly a common ancestor.
Furthermore the decision between an accuracy of monogenism or polygenism will
remain probably questionable until the end of human history.
The solution is according to me the change of Darwin's
theory of evolution presented by my Philosophy of Balance that the goal of
evolution, manifested increasingly with increasing evolutionary perfection of
every living organism, is not fighting for its life with other living
organisms, but as much as possible most perfect symbiosis with them. This is a
consequence of driving rule of natural evolution, which has to be according to
the Philosophy of Balance the ability of living organisms to recognize and
remember their friend and enemy. Then the
ultimate goal of natural evolution should not be the extinction of certain
human races, virtually other species of living organisms, but still more
perfect symbiosis among them.
Literature: http://www.cojeco.cz/index.php?s_term=&s_lang=2&detail=1&id_desc=74797 : polygenismus, author: -red-, CoJeCo, Vaše encyklopedie od roku 1999
, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_African_origin_of_modern_humans
, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygenism#Modern_adherents
, http://www.komsomol.cz/clanky/1900_fasismus_03.html : Arnošt Kolman: IDEOLOGIE NĚMECKÉHO FAŠISMU, Svoboda, Praha 1946
, see blue eyes and light skin color of
Europeans: http://www.novinky.cz/koktejl/322881-sobum-vezoucim-santu-se-ma-zhasnout-a-zatemnit-okna-radi-vedec.html : ČTK, 2013
, http://www.novinky.cz/zena/deti/289916-barva-oci-se-meni-az-do-tri-let-zelene-oci-jsou-temer-vzacnosti.html : 2013, das, Novinky
, http://www.novinky.cz/veda-skoly/286446-nejvetsimi-mutanty-na-zemi-jsou-evropane-odhaluje-nova-studie.html : 2012, pst, Novinky
, http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soci%C3%A1ln%C3%AD_darwinismus
, http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/O_p%C5%AFvodu_druh%C5%AF
)
(viz www.spvzt.cz , www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz , www.spvzt.sweb.cz
)
20. Whom would
I vote in the municipal elections in Hustopeče 2014 http://www.filosofie.cz/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1655 : Fil. experiment-Strana za práva všech živých tvorů
In the municipal elections in
Hustopeče 2014 I recommend to vote by
circling for candidates supporting green policy across all candidate entities
in Hustopeče. … However
everything can be wasted without better attitude to the animals and support of
the slaughter tax. ...
for the adoption of the
following draft of the law on the slaughter tax
(see http://www.spvzt.cz/Peticeporazkovadan.html)
RADICALLY RESTRICTING THE CONSUMPTION OF PRODUCTS
FROM SLAUGHTERED ANIMALS AND RADICALLY DISADVANTAGING AGRICULTURAL FACTORY FARMS FOR SLAUGHTER OF LIVESTOCK-TODAY'S
CONCENTRATION CAMPS, CAUSING THE WORST SUFFERING OF ANIMALS AS OPPOSED TO THE
FAMILY HOME ANIMAL AND ORGANIC ANIMAL BREEDS ALSO FOR THE PURPOSE OF SLAUGHTER
WITH THE ULTIMATE AIM OF BREEDING ALL LIVESTOCK UNTIL THEIR NATURAL DEATH, ON
PRINCIPLE OF THE OLD AGE AND CONSUMPTION OF SO OBTAINED NATURALLY DEAD CARRIONS
OF ANIMALS (after the autopsy of the veterinarian and on principle boiled in
several waters) INSTEAD OF SLAUGHTERED ANIMALS AND TO HELP PEOPLE IN EXTREME
NEED IN OUR COUNTRY AND IN THE WORLD
Below the Act on slaughter tax deals with the real
resolution of three main shortcomings of current Western democratic states and
Western civilization, which in the past enacted in their territory basic
natural human rights and freedoms. These three shortcomings are as follows.
Firstly, it is necessary for Western democratic states to ensure, that in
developing countries nobody had to die because of hunger, thirst, cold or lack
of health care. The second of these shortcomings of Western civilization is, if
on their territories people are dying of hunger, thirst, cold or lack of
routine health care. The third deficiency of Western civilization is the
relationship of people to other living creatures, in particular to animals at
present.
Below the Act on slaughter tax is based on the natural
right of every living creature to live a dignified, happy and long life and to
death almost without mental and physical pain on the basis of a fair law to be
replaced the struggle for life in society of living creatures by their
friendship for life and death.
on the slaughter tax
Preamble
The purpose of this Act is to take real responsibility
of a man for the slaughter (killing) of animals to these animals and the actual
gradual restriction of unnecessary killing of animals by man. The purpose of
this Act is also taking more responsibility for the fate of people at risk of
starvation and severe malnutrition diseases, both in the Czech Republic and
abroad. The purpose of this Act is also a genuine improvement in living
conditions of livestock in the interest of humanism.
§ 1
Subject to tax
(1) The following taxable goods are subject to
slaughter tax: the body or body parts, including blood from slaughtered
(killed) animals for this purpose, or contained in any foods for the purposes
of this Act within the meaning of the Act on Food and Tobacco Products 1) or non - food goods from slaughtered animals, which
have not been properly taxed by the slaughter tax. The subject to slaughter tax
are also animals as taxable goods which are exempt from the slaughter tax (§ 1
subsection 2 of this Act) to be delivered later to be killed by others to non -
business natural persons. Non - food goods for the purposes of this Act shall
mean all products and goods except for food.
(2) The subjects of
the slaughter tax are not home animals slaughtered in the family home breeding
of natural persons (further as family home breeding), where these breeds do not
exceed the total of more than 84 kg usual body weight of animals at slaughter
to a family member for the calendar year subject to the condition below. For
the family for the purposes of this Act it is considered the family as defined
by the Act on State Social Support 4).
§ 2
Exemption from the slaughter tax.
(1) Medicinal
products within the meaning of the Act on Medicinal Products 2) are exempt from
the slaughter tax.
(2) It is also
exempt from the slaughter tax for the calendar year:
63 kg of taxable goods-food per person-member
of family, if the decisive family income reaches the subsistence of the family
or less, 42 kg of taxable goods-food per person-family member, if a decisive
family income is greater than one times and less than or equal to twice the
amount of the subsistence of the family, 21 kg of taxable goods-food per
person-family member, if a decisive family income is more than twice and less
than or equal to three times the amount of family subsistence. In the case of a shorter period than the calendar year the above
exemption from the slaughter tax applies on proportion of the above weight. Act on the Life and Existence Minimum provides the
amount of subsistence 3). Decisive family income is defined in the Act on State
Social Support 4).
(3) An exempt
person may apply the exemption from the slaughter tax in writing at the
competent tax authority, subject to subsection 1 of this provision, soon after
1 calendar month and, subject to subsection 2 of this provision, after the
first calendar quarter. This person may apply the exemption from the slaughter
tax in writing no later than at the end of the following calendar year. The
competent tax office shall refund to the exempted person the paid slaughter tax
within 30 days from their proper exercise of the right, in particular
documented by accounting documents for the purchase of exempt taxable goods and
paid amount of the slaughter tax.
§ 3
Registered persons
(1) Business slaughter (killing) of animals may be
done only by legal and natural persons who are registered with the tax office
as slaughter taxpayer.
(2) Persons who import in their business to the Czech
Republic taxable goods from other tax territory within the European Community
they must be registered with the tax office as taxpayers before delivery.
(3) Persons, who sell to the Czech Republic from
abroad taxable goods through distance selling, they must be registered with the
customs authorities within 15 days of the sale of goods, even if they are not
taxpayers.
§ 4
Slaughter tax rate
(1) The general
rate of the slaughter tax on taxable goods-food is 100 percent of the selling
price including VAT of taxable goods forming foods. The rate of the slaughter
tax on non - food taxable goods is 200 percent of selling price including VAT
of taxable goods forming non - food goods.
The rate of
slaughter tax in the case of taxable goods from organic farming under the
legislation governing organic farming):
for the food
is 10 percent of the selling price, inclusive of value added tax taxable items
forming the food and
for non -
food taxable goods is 20 percent of the selling price, inclusive of value added
tax taxable items forming the non - food goods.
The rate of the
slaughter tax on animals, that are not subject to slaughter tax (§ 1 subsection
2 of this Act) to be delivered later to be killed by others to natural persons,
is 10% of the price paid.
The
condition for the application of both of these preferential rates of the
slaughter tax, is that these animals are 2/3 of their lives from birth until
slaughter in these farms, or in organic stock farming, othervise the general
rate of the slaughter tax from the selling price of the goods shall apply and
in family home farms after deduction previously paid, slaughter tax general
rate of the slaughter tax from the usual price of the goods.
The rate of
the slaughter tax in the case of taxable goods of halal and Kosher slaughter of
animals, there is in addition a 750 percent of selling price inclusive of value
added tax of taxable goods.
(2) The reported
selling price of taxable goods shall not vary more than 10 percent of the
normal price in terms of the valuation of property 5). The selling price of 1
kg of meat for cattle, poultry and piglets and pigs is for cattle the price of
slaughtered bodies (JUT) at cold, the price of chilled and frozen poultry and
for pigs and piglets the price of cold slaughtered bodies (JUT) announced at
the pricing reports of State Agricultural Intervention Fund on the basis of
relevant legislation 6).
(3) Required
taxable weight is the net weight in kilograms at a temperature of less than 2
degrees Celsius for slaughtered animals and 20 degrees Celsius for live
animals.
§ 5
Tax period
Tax period for the taxable goods is one calendar
month.
§ 6
Arise of obligation to declare and pay slaughter tax
(1) The obligation to declare and pay the slaughter
tax arises through slaughter (killing) of the animal in the Czech Republic or
import of taxable goods to the Czech Republic.
(2) The obligation to declare and pay slaughter tax
there is also
a) on detection of losses exceeded the standards set
for taxable goods during animal slaughter and movement of untaxed taxable
goods,
b) date of the finding illegally taking away untaxed
taxable goods during slaughter of animals, from stores or during a transport,
c) the date of acquisition, sale or detection of
untaxed taxable goods by legal or natural persons who store or transfer or
otherwise dispose of untaxed taxable goods that are subject to the slaughter
tax with the exception of taxable goods exempted from slaughter tax or not
subject to slaughter tax (§ 1, subsection 2), or the detection of the untaxed
taxable goods, which legal or natural persons manufactured without
authorization, and at the date that occurred before or
d) in the case of termination of activity at least one
day prior to the application for striking off the register or an application
for cancellation of business license, tax concerns the untaxed taxable goods
and all products containing untaxed taxable goods which are to this day owned
by the payer who manufactured, bought or imported the products, with the
exception of untaxed taxable goods exempted from slaughter tax or not subject
to slaughter tax (§ 1, subsection 2).
§ 7
Tax return to the slaughter tax and due date of the tax
(1) Taxpayers have an obligation after the tax period
and not later than 25th day of the following month to declare and pay the
slaughter tax for the taxable quantity of goods, that taxpayer made pursuant to
§ 3 subsection 1 of this Act by the slaughter of animals during the calendar
month and that taxpayer received pursuant to § 3 subsection 2 of this Act
during the calendar month. Other manufacturers and importers of taxable goods
are required to declare and pay tax before slaughter (killing) of the animal or
before delivery of the goods to the Czech Republic. The person or persons must
sign submission as the taxpayer.
(2) The competent tax authority may impose upon the
taxpayer, who has repeatedly failed to pay the slaughter tax in time, the
obligation to pay the slaughter tax in a shorter period. The competent customs
office or tax office may also require that the tax payer pays the slaughter tax
in shorter period, or require the provision of the adequate advance payment to
grant the slaughter tax
(3) The competent customs office or tax authority may
impose upon the tax payers, purchasers of imported taxable goods referred to in
§ 3, subsection 2 of this Act, who has repeatedly failed to pay the slaughter
tax in time, the obligation to grant tax before the delivery of the goods to
the Czech Republic. The competent customs office or tax office may also require
that taxpayers, purchasers of the goods referred to in § 3, subsection 2 of
this Act pay the slaughter tax before delivery of goods to the Czech Republic.
(4) If a tax return is not submitted within the
deadline, the competent customs office or tax authority may suspend the
registration of person until the lacking notification will be delivered to the
competent national authorities. Failing to pay the payable slaughter tax by the
14th day after the payment deadline, the competent customs office or tax
authority may suspend the registration of the person, until appropriate
slaughter tax is paid.
(5) The Ministry of Finance may lay down more rules
for granting and payment of the slaughter tax.
§ 8
Determination of taxable weight
(1) In business of persons registered under § 3,
subsection 1 taxable mass for payment period is determined on the basis of the
issuance from the premises of a taxpayer during the period in which the goods
were manufactured by taxpayer. If the current untaxed taxable goods in stock
made by tax payer or supplied here for resale are less than the difference
between the quantity of produced or delivered as follows untaxed taxable goods
and amount of the issued untaxed taxable goods, the shortfall in the amount
must be accounted for output.
(2) In business of persons who are registered
according to § 3, subsection 2, the measurement of taxable weight is based on
the amount of the supply of untaxed taxable goods to the business at a time,
when from abroad outside the Czech Republic such goods come into the business
without paying the slaughter tax.
§ 9
Slaughter tax on goods from abroad
(1) For taxable goods imported from outside the tax
territory of the European Communities one pays the slaughter tax. The slaughter
tax is paid according to the rules of the Customs Act 7).
(2) In other cases a slaughter tax is held in
connection with the supply of imported taxable goods here in the Czech
Republic.
§10
Persons who enjoy the privileges
and immunities under international treaties
For exemption from the slaughter tax of taxable goods beneficiaries of protection under international law
and the goods imported by persons located or residing outside the Czech
Republic, enjoying privileges and immunities under international treaties the
provisions of the Customs Act 7) are applied. The slaughter tax return
for beneficiaries of the privileges and immunities the Consumer Tax Act 8)
shall apply mutatis mutandis.
§ 11
Accounting Provisions
(1) Taxpayers must keep records of supply of taxable
goods and the expenditure of taxable goods. Businesses producing taxable goods,
must also keep records of raw materials and production of taxable goods.
(2) Taxable goods which taxpayer receives, for which
it has already been paid the slaughter tax, they must be separated from the
held stock of taxable goods of business, from which the slaughter tax was not
paid.
(3) In any transfer of taxable goods one is required
to issue a document indicating the name and address of the payer, possibly
exemption from the slaughter tax, price and type of taxable goods, amount and
taxable weight. The deliverer must keep a copy of the document 5 years after
the transfer or dispensing goods.
(4) Packaging of any product 10) placed on the market
must contain, if the product contains any proportion of taxable goods, the
visible sign of the proportion of taxable goods as a percentage, i.e. the weight
ratio of taxable goods contained in the product being marketed to the total
weight of any product as a percentage.
(5) The Ministry of Finance may further lay down rules
on accounting of slaughter tax payers and on documents on the transfer of
taxable goods as described therein.
§ 12
Slaughter tax on compensation.
(1) For goods under the customs tariff value, which
themselves are taxable under this Act or have taxable goods, the slaughter tax
on compensation shall be paid on imports from outside the tax territory of the
European Community. The slaughter tax on compensation is charged pursuant to
the provisions of the Customs Act 7).
(2) For purchase of goods from other countries in the
tax territory of the European Communities the slaughter tax on compensation
shall be paid in respect of delivering taxable goods here in the Czech
Republic.
(3) During the customs clearance, dispensing or
receiving of goods it is necessary to give the mass of taxable goods
(declaration of the manufacturer must be submitted), and further the amount of
the selling price and type of taxable goods.
(4) In the event, that the selling price of taxable
goods differs more than 10 percent of the normal price in terms of the
valuation of assets 5) the slaughter tax is calculated on the basis of customs
and tax determination of weight and of the normal price concerning taxable
goods.
(5) If the declaration by the manufacturer fails, the
slaughter tax is calculated on the basis of the taxable goods amounting to 50
percent weight of the goods and the use of the rate of the most taxable part of
compulsory taxable content of goods. If the State customs and tax authorities
asses, that the slaughter tax, calculated on the actual content of compulsory
taxable goods, should be at a higher level than so determined, the slaughter
tax is calculated by customs and financial government authorities on the basis
of a determination of the mass, the type and the usual price of the taxable
goods.
§ 13
Control provisions
(1) The State customs and tax authorities are entitled
to carry out checks on those businesses and those who are obliged to comply
with the obligations established by this Act, to inspections of inventories,
books, other accounting materials and a correspondence and others of firms.
(2) Persons affected by control, business owners and
employed persons of businesses must provide to State customs and tax
authorities the necessary assistance in carrying out the checks referred to in
subsection 1
(3) The material referred to in subsection 1 shall be
issued upon request or send to national customs and tax authorities.
(4) Suppliers of raw materials and packaging for those
producing taxable goods which are required to pay the slaughter tax according
to this Act, shall on request notify to the State customs and tax authorities
information of their goods supply to businesses that produce taxable goods.
(5) Entrepreneurs must notify on request to the public
customs and tax authorities the financial data on their purchases of taxable
goods for businesses.
(6) The State customs and tax authorities are
authorized to carry out checks on goods in transit if the goods within the
business are sold abroad or moving to other than registered taxpayers.
(7) The State customs and tax authorities are
authorized to carry out checks on goods stores and accounts, etc at businesses
referred to in subsection 3 to 5
(8) Police of the Czech Republic provides to national
customs and tax authorities the assistance in supervision.
(9) During the inspection under this Act one shall
proceed as for other control activities performed by the competent authorities
under special legislation, which sets out its mandate.
(10) The Ministry of Finance may establish rules
concerning the control operations that are necessary to implement the Act.
Administrative offenses
§ 14
It is prohibited to manufacture, import, sell or
otherwise transfer, offer for sale or transfer the untaxed taxable goods by
persons other than registered tax payers, except for goods which isn´t a
subject to slaughter tax (§ 1, subsection 2) or exempt from this tax.
§ 15
(1) A natural person commits an offense, if in the tax
territory of the Czech Republic he or she acquires or produces or imports to
this territory untaxed taxable goods except for goods which isn´t a subject to
slaughter tax (§ 1, subsection 2) and exempt from this tax. For this offense
may be imposed a fine up to 25 000 CZK.
(2) A natural person commits an offense, if in the tax
territory of the Czech Republic he or she acquires or produces or imports into
this territory within the activity with the showing signs of unauthorized
business untaxed taxable goods except for goods which isn´t a subject to the
slaughter tax or exempt from this tax. For this offense may be imposed a fine
up to 5 000 000 CZK.
§ 16
(1) A legal or a business natural person commits an
administrative offense, through that this person:
a) submits false or confusing information and will
protect the anonymity of data for taxable control,
b) violates § 3 subsection 1, 2, § 7 subsection 1, § 9
subsection 1, 2, § 11 subsection 1 to 4, § 13 subsection 2, 3, 4 or 5 and § 14,
c) does not respect the orders granted in connection
with § 7 subsection 2, 3,
d) continues the business covered by the obligation of
taxation, where the registration is invalid or suspended under § 7 subsection
4, and the State customs and tax authorities notified the person of that,
e) will take over, will secure or will appropriate
goods in the open market value of at least half a million Czech crowns, of
which the slaughter tax is not paid which should have been paid under the Act
or this person tries it.
(2) For the
administrative offense pursuant to subsection 1 letter a) to d) a fine up to 1
000 000 CZK shall be imposed.
(3) For the administrative offense pursuant to
subsection 1 letter e) a fine from 1 000 000 CZK to 50 000 000 CZK shall be
imposed.
(1) A legal person is not responsible for an
administrative offense, if it proves, that this person made every effort that
could be required to prevent the violation of legal obligation.
(2) In determining the area of fine of legal person
one shall take into account the seriousness of the administrative offense,
especially the manner, in which this person committed it, and its consequences
and the circumstances under which it was committed.
(3) The liability of legal persons for an
administrative offense shall be forfeited, if the administrative authority has
not commenced proceedings within 1 year from the date, on which it is found,
but no later than 3 years from the date, on which it was committed.
(4) Administrative offenses the competent territorial
financial authorities proceed, the administrative offenses for import of
illegally untaxed taxable goods the customs offices and customs directorates
proceed. If an administrative offense the more competent administrative
authorities shall proceed, the administrative offense will be proceeded by it,
which found first a breach of obligation or prohibition, and if an
administrative procedure is initiated, so the administrative body which
initiated the administrative proceedings sooner.
(5) For the responsibility for conduct that occurred
in the business of a natural person or in direct connection with it the
provisions of law on liability and sanctions of legal persons are applicable.
(6) The fine is payable within 30 days from the date,
on which the decision becomes final, by which it was imposed. Fines are
collected by the authority, which imposed them. The Financial Authority
executes fines. Revenue from fines is the income of the State budget. A
decision imposing a fine can be executed within 5 years after the deadline for
its payment.
Forfeiture and seizure of secured taxable goods
(1) The administrative body responsible for processing
administrative offence imposes the forfeiture of illegal untaxed taxable goods
found during inspections under this Act, if
a) belong to an administrative offense offender and
b) were used or intended to commit an administrative
offense.
(2) If it is not ordered forfeiture of things referred
to in subsection 1, the decision of seizure will be, if
a) they belong to the offender, who cannot be
prosecuted for an administrative offense,
b) they do not belong to an administrative offense
offender or they do not belong to an owner wholly or
c) the owner is unknown,
and by putting it into circulation, when taking into account their quantity,
the harm could be done to the economic interests of the State protected by this
law.
(3) The offender of an administrative offense, who was
imposed the forfeiture, or the person, with whom illegally untaxed taxable
goods were seized one shall impose an obligation to compensate the State the
costs associated with the management and transfer or destruction of forfeited
or seized illegally untaxed taxable goods.
(4) The decision on the seizure of thing and on the
obligation to reimburse the State costs associated with the management and
transfer or destruction of illegal untaxed taxable goods cannot be appealed.
(5) The owner of forfeited or seized illegally untaxed
taxable goods becomes the State. Customs or tax office sells the forfeited or
seized illegally untaxed taxable goods or destroys them, if it is not
successful to dispose of them. Three-person committee designated by the customs
and tax office director from employees supervises the sale and destruction, who
work in this office.
(6) If the secured illegally untaxed taxable goods are
not declared forfeited or seized they shall be returned without undue delay to
that who owns undoubtedly them, or otherwise to that, from whom they were
taken.
§ 19
Using funds from the slaughter tax
(1) The funds obtained by collection of the slaughter
tax, after deducting the costs associated with State administration and
collection of slaughter tax, they belong exclusively to the State Agricultural
Intervention Fund 6), which is required to use these funds as follows.
(2) At least half of these funds the State
Agricultural Intervention Fund shall use for grants to fund program 9), which
will be specifically set up, that manufacturers and service providers of
business related to the slaughter (killing) factory fading of animals could
switch over to other ways of doing agricultural business including organic slaughter farming in accordance with
the legislation governing organic farming 12) and to improve living conditions of livestock in the
interest of humanism and due to the
urgency of the individual grant according to the amount of unnecessary death
and pain of the animals excluded by this funding.
(3) At the most half of these funds the State
Agricultural Intervention Fund shall be use for the implementation of
intervention purchases of food of agricultural crop farming and livestock
production, which is not associated with the slaughter of animals, and
providing storage or processing of agricultural food purchased as above. For sale or other method of transfer of such
interventionally purchased agricultural foodstuffs or products resulted from
processing of such interventionally purchased agricultural foodstuffs the State
Agricultural Intervention Fund must always give priority to food assistance for
people at the risk of starvation or severe malnutrition diseases, whether in
the Czech Republic (the homeless), or in other states. These sales and
transfers the State Agricultural Intervention Fund is entitled to carry out
with due diligence on favorable pricing conditions or free of charge.
Common and final provisions
§ 20
For the payment of the slaughter tax under provisions
of this Act the one is liable, who, as the owner, lesser or similar is
operating business at his or her own expense, including imports of goods
designated according to § 9, and the one, who owns the goods.
§ 21
For the purposes of this Act one means the tax
territory of the European Communities the territory established by the relevant
legislation of the European Communities. 11) The territory of the Principality
of Monaco is considered as the territory of the French Republic, the territory
of Jungholz and Mittelberg (KleinesWalsertal) is considered as the territory of
the Federal Republic of Germany, the Isle of Man is considered as the territory
of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the San Marino
is considered as the territory of the Italian Republic.
§ 22
Ministry of Finance
will issue a decree to implement the relevant provisions of this Act referring
to.
§ 23
This Act shall take effect on ...
1) Act No. 110/1997
Collection on Food and Tobacco Products
2) Act No 378/2007
Collection about drugs and changes in some related Acts (Drugs Act)
3) Act 110/2006 Collection
Life and Existence Minimum
4) Act No. 117/1995 Collection
State Social Support
5) Act No. 151/1997
Collection about Property Valuation
6) Commission
Regulation 1249/2008, Act No. 256/2000 Collection about the State Agricultural
Intervention Fund and the CR Government Regulation No. 249/2004 Collection
7) Act No. 13/1993 Collection Customs
Act
8)
Act
No. 353/2003 Collection on Consumer
Taxes
9) Act No. 218/2000 Collection
on Budget Rules
10) Act No. 477/2001 Collection
on Packaging
11) Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February on the general
arrangements for the holding, movement and monitoring of products subject to
consumer tax, as amended by Directives 92/108/EEC, 94/74/EC, 96/99/EC, 2000/44/EC
and 2000/47/EC
12) Act No. 242/2000 Collection, on organic farming, the European Council Regulation EC 834/2007 on
organic farming and Commission Regulation 889/2008
The explanatory memorandum to the draft of Act on the
slaughter tax
The preamble and §
19 of the Act
Act on the slaughter tax shall remedy the current
deficiencies of three main shortcomings of current Western democratic states
and Western civilization, which in the past enacted in their territory basic
natural human rights and freedoms. These three shortcomings are as follows.
Firstly, it is necessary for Western democratic states to ensure, that in
developing countries nobody had to die because of hunger, thirst, cold or lack
of health care. The second of these shortcomings of Western civilization is, if
on their territories people are dying of hunger, thirst, cold or lack of
routine health care. The third deficiency of Western civilization is the
relationship of people to other living creatures, in particular to animals at a
present.
The guiding permanent principle of the slaughter tax is, that man and
other legal entities still caused the minimum of unnecessary death and pain of
other living creatures, in this case of animals. Conflicting views of the
impact of vegetarianism on human health, especially for children and pregnant
women, however, we do not allow a direct ban on goods originating from
slaughtered animals. We need to go through successive steps, where the impact
of the gradual reduction of consumption of goods is verified, virtually food
from slaughtered animals due to increasing rates of the slaughter tax on the
health of human population.
As an
example India can serve us, where the average age 67,5-70 years (see CIA World
Fact book 2008 Estimates for Life Expectancy at birth (years), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy
), here most of people has no money for basic medical treatment and there they
die reportedly e.g. for appendicitis. What would be the average age if there
would be good public health and health insurance as in the Western world?
Therefore India can serve for us as an example of a high average age in the
case of a genetic adaptation to vegetarianism for many generations because of
here dominant Hinduism (According to the report of UN Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations-FAO, see http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y4252E/y4252e05c.htm : 3.3.2 Prospects for the livestock sector
, India's meat consumption is very low - currently 4.5 kg per capita - and it
has grown by only 1 kg in the last 20 years.). The combination of vegetarianism
and Western health care would probably be possible in future with a gradual
genetic adaptation of Western populations to vegetarianism to achieve a much
higher average age than today, and both in the west and in the developing
world. So it is to bring a much fairer society as for the people in the west
and in the developing world, as well as for livestock.
Intensive
"animal production" requires approximately 25 times more land for
production of food unit in comparison to when the same unit of food is obtained
from plant sources. (Fr. John Dear, S.J. Cesta za Ježíšovým nenásilím, www.vegetarian.cz ).
Every day
worldwide 15 thousand children die due to malnutrition. This is much more, than
those killed in wars and natural disasters. The number of these children is
still rising, UNICEF informed that is engaged in the help of children in immediate
danger to life. The countries with the highest incidence of child malnutrition
are North Korea, Zambia, Burundi, Nepal, Afghanistan, Yemen and Ethiopia. All
of these countries have the incidence of child malnutrition in children less
than five years over 50 percent. (See http://aktualne.centrum.cz/clanek.phtml?id=159572 ) The Jean Ziegler, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Ziegler
, “The Right to Food:
Report by the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Mr. Jean Ziegler,
Submitted in Accordance with Commission on Human Rights Resolution 2000/10”,
see http://hei.unige.ch/~clapham/hrdoc/docs/foodrep2001.pdf
, United Nations, February
7, 2001, p. 5. “On average, 62 million people die each year, of whom probably
36 million (58 per cent) directly or indirectly as a result of nutritional
deficiencies, infections, epidemics or diseases which attack the body when its
resistance and immunity have been weakened by undernourishment and hunger.”
The World
Food Program (World Food Program) devotes this issue, which is the world's
largest humanitarian organization in the fight against hunger. WFP is a part of
the United Nations and it is funded voluntarily.
WFP works in
Africa (Algeria, Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde,
Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Democratic Republic, Congo, Ivory Coast,
Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya,
Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Namibia,
Niger, Rwanda, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia,
Sudan, Swaziland, Gambia, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe), in America (Bolivia,
Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Peru), in Asia
(Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, Georgia,
India, Indonesia, Korean People's Democratic Republic, Lao People’s Democratic
Republic, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan,
Timor-Leste) and in the Middle East (Iran, Iraq, Jordan, occupied Palestinian
territory, Syria, Yemen). (see www.wfp.org)
At most 50%
of collected funds from the slaughter tax determined for food assistance can be
directed for example in collaboration with UNICEF and WFP in particular to the
above mentioned countries.
People
consuming animal products from killed animals would be justified by the payment
of the slaughter tax also morally before the own conscience and also before the
society because the collected slaughter tax would serve to save the lives of
hungry people. And thus people have learnt to appreciate life and to save other
living creatures and to take the real and legal responsibility to all people
and other living creatures.
To § 1 subsection 2
and §§ 2, 3, 19 of the Act
According to opponents of vegetarianism the lack of
meat and other food from slaughtered animals may cause following disease in
humans adapted to receive these foods: Kwashiorkor, Endemic goiter, nutritional
anemia, Rickets (rachitis), Osteomalacia, Osteoporosis (see Vegetariánství a
sport, Bachelor thesis of Martina Niederle led by Ing. Iva Hrnčiříková, Masaryk
University, Faculty of Sports Studies Department of Health, Brno 2008).
Therefore until resolution of this contradiction by
gradually reducing the consumption of these foods from animals due to rising
rates of slaughter tax it is necessary to enable people and animals adapted to
this food from slaughtered animals to receive it among other through the
exclusion or exemption from the slaughter tax depending on their financial
income, if they do not have sufficient financial income.
Furthermore, it should be a
radical disadvantage of agricultural factory farming of animals for the purpose
of slaughter-today's concentration camps, causing the worst suffering of
animals as opposed to home family and organic farming of livestock also for the
purpose of slaughter.
Among other things, one-tenth
rate of the slaughter tax for goods from organic slaughter breeding, because
they are more merciful, and exclusion or exemption from the slaughter tax of
family home breeds of farm animals for the purpose of slaughter of 133
kilograms live weight of an animal for a member of the household and a year,
because those members of home breeders have to bred animals fundamentally
personal relationship on the basis of personal care for farm animals as family
members.
The same tax rate of organic
farms and the livestock delivered to the home family farms has to prioritize
the education of these farm animals from the baby, when at the time of taxation
at the time of delivery of the animal to the home breed this animal has a
minimum mass as opposed to an adult animal.
At least half of the revenue
of the slaughter tax will also be tied purposely by the Act on the slaughter
tax for subsidies to more merciful agricultural organic breeds, in relation to the urgency of the individual grants according to the
amount of unnecessary death and pain of animals excluded by this subsidy, i.e.
the largest subsidy will be directed to the implementation of projects to
improve the welfare of animals in most cruel slaughter and in most cruel farms,
such as halal and Kosher slaughters and the slaughter agricultural factory farms.
The rate of slaughter tax from
halal and Kosher slaughters of animals is, moreover, very high, because it is
the most cruel currently legally permitted slaughters. The aim is to reduce
these most cruel currently legally authorized animal slaughters, the second
goal is that both Jews and Muslims have a moral, legal and financial
responsibility for these merciless presently legally permitted slaughters,
because the whole of the slaughter tax yield is by the Act on the slaughter tax
tied to the subsidies for the agricultural organic more merciful also slaughter
breeds and to help people in dire need, as I argue above.
To § 6 subsection 1 and § 9 of the Act
According to Article
1, point 3 of Council
Directive 2008/118/ES from 16 December 2008 on the general arrangements for
consumer taxes and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC Member States
may levy a tax a) on products other than goods subject to consumer tax, b) on
the provision of services, including those relating to goods subject to
consumer tax, if such tax shall not be characterized as turnover tax. The
selection of these taxes must not lead to border-crossing formalities in trade
between Member States. Therefore it is not possible to make for the slaughter
tax the obligation to declare and pay the slaughter tax on the transfer of
taxable goods across borders of the Czech Republic in case of imports from
other countries of tax territory of the European Community.
4. Interview: Meat
tax - utopia or a solution?
Is the idea of a meat tax utopia or a solution? Will
pain and suffering be taxed, which are hidden in each hamburger or a plate with
steaks? So after reading the following interview, where the questions of
Vegetarian.cz editors are answered by JUDr.
Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., a lawyer, a philosopher – an author of the idea
of so-called meat tax, we might learn more.
First part of the interview
Vegetarian.cz: Meat tax, this is a joke, right?
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: Fun is tenseness alternated by relaxation. In this case, however, it is
not possible, because now living creatures are dying which shall not die at
all. Today, for example, animals are legally considered as mere things, with
that our cruel treatment of other living creatures is connected. Why should a
living creature die with impunity, when it is not absolutely necessary?
Therefore, meat tax, so let anyone, who kills an animal, to pay for it, let people
learn to appreciate life and to save other living creatures.
Vegetarian.cz: Hm ... Could you further explain?
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: It would probably be an indirect tax, where taxable transactions should
certainly be primarily from the sale of meat and other products from
slaughtered animals, such as blood, bone, skin, fur, etc. Another taxable
transaction would be the sale of live animals for slaughter (e.g. piglets for
home and factory fattening pigs), animals for medical experiments of
pharmaceutical companies, or animals for experiments of cosmetic companies,
even though I would prefer a total ban in the last case.
Taxable transaction of meat tax would cover therefore all cases, where
there is killing of animals. Tax is levied from the provider of taxable
transactions and the percentage would be added to the price of output and
subtracted from the price of entry similar to VAT. People would be exempt for
health reasons from the meat tax. The main purpose of the meat tax would be for
man to take finally the legal responsibility to other living creatures that are
at a lower evolutionary level than a man, of which development the man has to
manage to universal benefit under keywords still to cause the least possible
death and pain.
At the same time I realize, that carnivore cannot live without meat
(because organic matter eats each other), so the meat tax does not serve as a
ban of meat eating, but its limitation in its above basic purpose still to
cause the minimum death and pain in the nature. The tax rates of meat tax
should also be adjusted to this basic purpose, these rates should increase with
evolutionary maturity of killed animal, i.e. with the increasing perfection of
the nervous system and so it is its increasing ability to feel pain, therefore,
to suffer physically and mentally. This means the lower rate of meat tax for
killed fish and birds than for killed mammals.
Vegetarian.cz: What exactly would be the purpose
of tax?
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: The aim of the meat tax would be restrictions on the consumption of
products from the killed animals. Livestock production is causing a greater
share in the creation of greenhouse gases on our planet, thus it burdens
greatly the environment. Increased consumption of meat has according to current
researches negative impact on health and the length of human life, imposing
their spending on the social and health system of each country.
Restriction of livestock production would also allow giving the freed
capacity to pay production of plant foods such as cereals and to save so many
lives in a starving third world. In my opinion, killing living creatures is
also behind the litigiousness of today's world, the question is not, for
example, what led to the firing of a terrorist bomb in a crowd and killing, but
the question is why in our world one kills at all, why in our world one must
ever die.
Vegetarian.cz: What is your answer to this
question?
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: As to me the answer, that every unnecessary death of any living
creature in our world, increases hatred and litigiousness in our world. Meat
tax thus represents a payment for the above-mentioned external costs of killing
other living creatures, which remain outstanding otherwise and they represent
for the future in terms of economy the financial burden.
(I would also like to thank here for
their valuable suggestions for my project of meat tax provided to me by members
of my parent organization Brno-center of Green Party).
Vegetarian.cz: Thank you for the first part of
an interesting conversation.
REDACTION http://www.vegetarian.cz/rozhovor/dgmdan.html
5. Interview II.
Meat tax - Utopia or a solution?
Is the idea of a meat tax utopia or a solution? Will pain and suffering
be taxed, which are hidden in each hamburger or a plate with steaks? So after
reading the following interview, where the questions of Vegetarian.cz editors
are answered by JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., a lawyer, a
philosopher – an author of the idea of so-called meat tax, we might learn
more.
Second part of the conversation
Vegetarian.cz: Do you think, that your proposal
will be properly understood?
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: In the previous post, I worked with the meat tax from the point of view
of prevention of the damages, i.e. as payment for any external costs to the
environment and society as a significant greenhouse gas emissions from animal
production, deterioration of health of people who eat too many meat products,
and increasing aggression and ruthlessness of people accustomed to unnecessary
death of living creatures. Again, I would like to stress, that the purpose of
taxation is not to ban meat, which would be inhuman to carnivores that need
meat to survive, but it seeks to reduce the unnecessary killing of animals and
the follow-up consumption.
Vegetarian.cz: Could you explain the positive
economic meat tax implications on the lives of our society?
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D:
Today's capitalist economy is based solely on personal profit, when
people seek to preserve and to ensure only their life or the life of their
relatives or friends in the natural struggle for life, not as much as possible
the life of all people, indeed all living creatures.
A capitalist economy is based on the assumption of sustained economic
growth. Economic growth based solely on the personal benefit of individual or
the group of individuals near to him or her, but it has always its ceiling when
these individuals no longer buy consumer goods, either out of fear of the
future, or simply because they filled their personal economic needs (emotional
needs are inexhaustible) and they do not have to increase their consumption.
On the further economic growth, however, banks provide and provided in
advance to entrepreneurs and State loans if in the past in history the economic
growth had not taken place, banks began to fail, they came the crisis, State
debts, a large inflation (i.e., devaluation of money), failed enterprises, high
unemployment, widespread poverty, or national monetary reform, or armament, war
and drift towards war (see Black Friday on the New York Stock Exchange, the
Great Depression in the 30s, the advent of fascism in Germany, Italy, Japan,
etc. and the outbreak of WW2).
Dealing with these recurring problems in the capitalist economy I see to
focus people not only on personal gain but to the greatest possible saving and
sustaining lives of all people and then all living creatures, whose economic
needs are almost endless, they do not have their ceiling and therefore one can
count on sustained economic growth.
Vegetarian.cz: How would it work in real life?
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: From the above perspective the meat tax should be seen as a growth -
economic measure aimed at preventing recurrent crises of capitalist economy,
provided that the meat tax revenue will be used in the form of State grants
(i.e. subsidies) to farmers and other entrepreneurs affected by the restriction
of the livestock production for the purpose of its conversion to crop
production and sales of vegetable products and breeding of animals for animals
carrions (cadavers), which were not intentionally killed by any human and
therefore died on principle of old age,(cadavers) .
Market surplus of crop food and above mentioned animal food would be
redeemed by State from the funds obtained by collecting a meat tax and free of
charge or at a special price they would be supplied to developing countries and
their own people (i.e. homeless) who suffer from hunger. Existing agricultural
production in the developed Western world would be able to supply plant food
together with their own people, and even their own homeless, also throughout
the hungry developing world, because intensive "livestock production"
requires approximately 25 times more land to produce the food unit compared
with that, when the same unit of food is obtained from plant sources. (Fr. John
Dear, S.J. Cesta za Ježíšovým nenásilím, vegetarian.cz, see : http://www.vegetarian.cz/ostatni/cesta%20za%20jesusv5.html
). According to the United Nations every day in the world approximately 60
thousand people, mostly women and children die as a result of starvation and
related diseases. (Fr. John Dear, S.J. Cesta za Ježíšovým nenásilím,
vegetarian.cz, see: http://www.vegetarian.cz/ostatni/cesta%20za%20jesusv1.html%20
)
(author’s correction of two previous paragraphs of the text was done on
26/01/2012)
Vegetarian.cz: Do you think that money from the
tax may outweigh pain and suffering?
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: Thanks to meat tax the existing jobs would be not only maintained in
the Western world, but there would be a sustained increase in employment in
these countries and their continued economic growth without crises and wars. At
the same time a man consuming meat and animal products would be morally
justified before the own conscience and before the society and also because the
collected meat tax would serve to save the lives of hungry people. And while
people have learned to appreciate life and to save other living creatures and
to take the real and legal responsibility to all people and to other living
creatures.
Vegetarian.cz: Do you have a message for our
readers? Can they actively participate in some way, if they would like to
support you?
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D: If they want to write me about the meat tax, they can do so at ak-gruza@seznam.cz
To readers of Vegetarian.cz and to all of us I wish for Christmas and
New Year 2010 to live in a world, where is less death and pain than in the
world in 2009.
Vegetarian.cz: Thank you for the interview and
we join to your wish:-)
REDACTION http://www.vegetarian.cz/rozhovor/dgmdan1.html
6. Interview: Meat tax - change of name to the
slaughter tax
Vegetarian. cz: We would like to ask about continuation of your
activity with "so-called" meat tax?
...
My original
intention has been confirmed that it is not possible to work on this bill with
only vegetarians, who are a minority in Czech society, one must turn
to non - vegetarians, take into account the opinion of opponents of
vegetarianism, that the complete lack of meat can damage health of some
individuals.
Therefore in my
opinion it is to proceed with slaughter (meat) tax as in the case of
medicine, therefore, it is to reduce the consumption of food from killed
animals by successive legislative steps, that, if the concerns of
opponents of the negative impact of vegetarianism on the health of our
population do not acknowledge, it is possible gradually to increase slaughter
tax rates up to a level which will result in the complete exclusion of food
from killed animals. A similar procedure is in testing a new drug in medicine,
when the new drug is first tested on a small group of volunteers,
then extensive studies are carried out, then eventually it is registered
as a new drug for the general population, but one still monitors its adverse
effects on human health. Vegetarianism I personally consider such a remedy for
moral, health and environmental problems of our society (see my previous Interviews
on the slaughter tax).
Therefore I
formulated on the basis of received comments the specific Bill http://www.vegetarian.cz/a/nzakona.html and the Explanatory Memorandum http://www.vegetarian.cz/a/mddz.html of the Act on
slaughter tax, which is based on the Danish Act No. 616 from 30 June 1994
concerning the taxation of chocolate and sweets, etc. (i.e. unhealthy foods),
as amended (see in particular https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=13209 : LBK nr 567 af 03/08/1998 Skatteministeriet Chokoladeafgiftsloven Yderligere oplysninger Bekendtgorelse af lov om afgift af chokolade- og sukkervarer m.m., a certified
translation from Danish was available) in respect to the fact, that I did
not consider as taxable goods the chocolate etc., but the goods from the killed
animals. Next I drew up the English translation of the draft of Act on
slaughter (meat) tax and of initial interviews to this Act.
Vegetarian.cz: Why did you modify the name and what are your
reasons for doing so?
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza
Ph.D: Here are three reasons. The first one - it
is probably not possible to pay the slaughter (meat) tax for each sale of
meat from the slaughterhouse, wholesaler, retailer to the final customer as in
the case of VAT, but one must use the concept of consumer tax. The obligation
to pay the tax will exist only if the first sale after the slaughter of
the animal, so slaughter tax. Second, the subject of the slaughter (meat) tax
will not be only meat but all the goods from the killed animals, with the
exception of registered medicines for sale in pharmacies, so the slaughter tax.
I also responded to the possible evolution of current scientific knowledge,
which may be able to grow any artificial meat without the slaughter and
suffering of animals, the subject of the slaughter tax will be only meat and
other goods from slaughtered animals, not such artificial flesh (currently
so-called fetal calf serum is most often used for the production of synthetic
meat, for which production it is necessary to kill a cow, there are non -
animal feed of tissue cultures, which is very expensive, see http://3pol.cz/1101/print : TŘIPÓL e-zin popelarizující vědu a techniku,
Medicína a přírodověda, Vepřový
řízek ze zkumavky, 2011, Zdroj: Nature, 9 December 2010, Vol
468, str. 752 až 753, Edita Bromová).
Vegetarian.cz: Why have you chosen to support the tax through the
form of petition and other means of support for your Act have you excluded?
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza
Ph.D: I realize to convince people about the need to go the way of the
slaughter tax as a long-term question, it's run for the long haul. And as in
the case of consumers of meat and in the case of vegetarians, such as
politicians-vegetarians in the Green Party, who have to worry about their
constituents, most of them eat conventionally. Even among vegetarians - the
politicians of the Green Party it is considered, that we should wait with this
project until after the parliamentary and municipal elections, and then we'll
see. The problem is that by me established the Act on slaughter tax has no
financial or other benefit for any lobby group, the real benefit from it just
the animals will have, of which killing and suffering will be gradually
avoided. Animals do not have the right to vote and one cannot count their votes
in the election. Politicians today are not used to promote and to defend
the altruistic laws, bringing benefits in long term and which do not present
for their constituents material benefit in the short term, but rather the
material disadvantages. So I have decided as a first step for the form of a
petition, to check whether a substantial proportion of people are willing to do
something for animals without personal gain in short term.
...
http://www.vegetarian.cz/rozhovor/dgmdan3.html
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D. was born in Hustopeče near Brno in the Czech
Republic in 1973. Graduated from high school mathematical class there at the
Captain Jaroše Avenue and the Law Faculty of Charles University in Prague,
where he earned a Master of Arts.
He also completed post-doctoral studies at the same university, where he
received degrees Ph.D. and Doctor of Laws JUDr. The topic of his dissertation
and doctoral thesis was "The use of foreign law in private international
law”. Since 2002, JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D. is an attorney at law firm based in
Hustopeče near Brno registered in the list of Czech Bar Association.
With vegetarianism he started several times, since 2008 I am on
principle the sole fruitarian (i.e. eating only plant fruits and plant seeds),
in dire need I am ovo-lacto vegetarian and in dire need I eat the corpses of
animals that has not been intentionally killed by any human, after the
veterinarian autopsy and boiled in several waters. His interests include philosophy,
law and politics. In 2009 he published a book of Philosophy of Balance
(Harmony). He speaks English, French, Italian, German, Russian and Hebrew at
the conversational level.
He has a
shelter for chickens and a dog from a shelter, in which they named him Buddy (or
"Bad" i.e. in English poor) and who I renamed "Gud" (see
English good, i.e. in Czech dobrý or in English God, i.e. in Czech Bůh), who I
try to feed according to the above mentioned principle of permanent causing the
least possible death and pain of other living creatures, from the cadavers of
animals on principle only the cadavers of animals intentionally not killed by
any human, i.e. they died of old age, after the autopsy by a veterinarian.
REDACTION http://www.vegetarian.cz/predstav/dgruza.html
A PETITION NECESSARY FOR THE FORMATION OF THE
POLITICAL PARTY:
Please sign the Petition
required for the formation of a political Party for the Rights of All Living
Creatures, so that all living creatures have in our society equitable
rights recognized by the laws of the State.
(The signature under the Petition does not imply membership in the Party.)
This can be made at the seat of the Party in an official time or
by filling out the below online form in your mail client on http://www.spvzt.cz/Peticezavznikstrany.html,
then we will send you by e-mail the completed petition sheet with your
data, which printed out (preferably on recycled paper) and signed please send
via post to my address shown below , or send straight via
post the printed out (preferably on recycled paper) and
signed petition sheet referred to here in the format: pdf and doc on http://www.spvzt.cz/Peticezavznikstrany.html
to JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.d., Dobrovského 56/7, 693 01 Hustopeče.
Dobrovského 56/7, 693 01 Hustopeče (The house is not
far from the central square, in which the first Czechoslovak President T.G. Masaryk lived
in the years 1861-1863) - MAP
Official hours: after telephone arrangement
tel. 00420 534 008 871, tel.
00420 606 302 812
e-mail zakladatel@spvzt.cz
-------------------------PETITION,-----------------
-to form the political Party
for the Rights of All Living Creatures-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------www.spvzt.cz--------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------We
cannot survive without cadavers of animals!---------------------
------------------------------------ We want
only the merciful organic meat--------------------------
--------------- Slaughter
factory farming are animal concentration camps!-------------
--------- The
slaughter tax contributes to the change of factory farming to organic farming.
-------
-------------------------- The slaughter tax will help
people in dire need.---------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Hustopeče
18/12/2012. For petition the founder: JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.-attorney at
law with seat Mírová 4,69301 Hustopeče,
branch: Svat. Čecha 5, 69301 Hustopeče, tel. 534008871, cell 606302812--------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with this
petition and I declare, that I am the citizen of Czech Republic 18 years old:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Complete name:------Date
of Birth:--- Complete permanent address:--------------------------
Signature:------------
Gain GRATIS
trade designation of rightness:
"THE MOST MERCIFUL
PRODUCTS"
(Czech: NEJMILOSRDNĚJŠÍ
PRODUKTY, Slovak: NAJMILOSRDNEJŠÍ PRODUKTY, Spanish: LOS PRODUCTOS MÁS
MISERICORDIOSOS, French: LES PRODUITS LES PLUS MISÉRICORDIEUX, Russian: наиболее
милостивые
продукты, German: DIE
BARMHERZIGSTEN PRODUKTE, Italian: I PRODOTTI PIÙ MISERICORDIOSI,מוצרים הרחומים
ביותר: Hebrew)
1. The
award-won most merciful products-a list see:
(list in Czech in format: htm
www.spvzt.cz/Seznam.htm
and pdf www.spvzt.cz/Seznam.pdf )
( list in English in format: htm
www.spvzt.cz/List.htm
and pdf www.spvzt.cz/List.pdf
)
1.1 Cadavers dying naturally,
principally of the old age, from home poultry farms for diet of the dogs or
cats, possibly human
This
food mercy (i.e. symbiosis) may be based on the breeding of broiler chickens to
their natural death of old age, virtually their most common heart attack, which
occurs when the outdoor breeding in a chicken coop in their age on average 2-3
years, whereas, broiler chickens are hard race and broilers are originally bred
to life with a length of approximately 30 days until their slaughter for meat.
We feed broilers grain grown without herbicides and pesticides, as well as
dried organic alfalfa, which naturally includes dried insects and fresh grass.
After the broiler has died, it is necessary to perform its autopsy by
veterinarian, in order to determine whether it did not die of some contagious
illness, especially of a bacterial or viral infection. Then it is necessary to
freeze a broiler and to calculate the minimum quantity of this carrion of an
animal that will be necessary for the healthy nutrition of a particular dog or
cat. This is done in such a way that we feed dog or cat with diet free from the
corpses of animals i.e. the eggs and milk, both are the best from home breed,
and in my experience the best purely vegetarian organic feed is yarrah for dog
or purely vegetarian feed ami cat for cats (in my experience a dog or cat will
not survive only on a purely vegetarian feed ami cat or yarrah for dogs,
although the manufacturer states that it is a complete feed, during the exclusive
long-term use of the purely vegetarian feed ami dog my dog vomited permanently
the yellow water), that according to my experience animals like to eat and we
watch occurrence of the symptoms of allergic reactions of the animals to this
feed. Symptoms of an allergic reaction to this feed are vomiting, diarrhea, or
scratching of a dog or a cat, after occurrence of allergic reaction of this dog
or cat we feed immediately 200 grams of frozen carrion of an animal, which we
will cut with a meat cleaver from frozen carrion of the animal. Then again, all
of the steps of above diet of a dog or a cat without dead animals only with the
aforementioned eggs and milk and the feed yarrah for dog or ami cat for cat and
when above mentioned allergic reactions appear we determine the number of days
the animal survives with 200 grams of a carrion of an animal, and we calculate
by dividing the 200 grams of carrion of animal with this number of days a
minimum quantity of a carrion of an animal which we have to give a cat or dog
for above mentioned feeding without the dead animals that the cat or dog stays
healthy. At the same time, even if we adhere to this minimum amount of carrions
of animals, so when the above allergic reactions appear at a dog or a cat we
must feed them additional large quantity of this animal carrion not to endanger
the dog or cat a life dangerous allergic shock. The most dangerous threat of
death of nutritional inadequacy, when the above vegetarian feed of a dog or a
cat, basically, if we do not apply correctly the above steps, is physical-motor
problems of a dog or a cat, at their occurrence a vet has to always be found
immediately, who typically applies to an animal injected vitamins from corpses
of animals and the standard diet should be recovered for a period of
convalescence of the animal (i.e. meat canned) of a dog or a cat. Perhaps for animals it is unnecessary, but for humans necessary to boil
the carrions of animals in several waters. To the human with the allergy with
long-term ovo-lacto vegetarian diet for details see http://www.spvzt.cz/SPVZTbooklet.html#7 .
The above steps of merciful
feeding I apply with the success for myself and also already 4 years for my dog
(up to 07/2013 purely vegetarian feed ami dog), that in 2013 reaches the age of
7 years, which needs in the aforementioned vegetarian lacto-ovo feeding method
according to the above calculation, when its weight approximately 10 kg, at
least 10 grams of a carrion of an animal per day (that is, when for example I
will give it 120 grams of animal carrion, it lasts for a maximum of 12 days)
and which I regularly do a complete blood analysis at the vet also, according
to the latest complete blood analysis of my dog at the vet from 20.2.2013 my
dog is in this diet completely healthy (that is, it has all the blood values
OK).
Literature: http://www.amipetfood.com/ : Ami Pet food, Italy
, http://www.spvzt.cz/ , http://www.spvzt.sweb.cz/ , http://www.filosofierovnovahy.sweb.cz/ , http://www.yarrah-bio.cz/content/1-psi : Organic Vega dry dog food, Yarrah Organic Petfood B.V., the Netherlands
1.2 Plant
fertilizer made only from meat and bone meal from cadavers of naturally died,
i.e. not slaughtered animals
This
plant fertilizer is produced from boiled animal by-products of a glue factory
so called of 2nd category (basically of naturally died, i.e. not slaughtered
animals) - meat and bone meal. In addition it is possible to
make additional veterinary test of microbial cultivation of the presence of
bacteria in the fertilizer preferably in a private veterinary laboratory. The
feeding of fertilizer from carcasses to dogs and cats is prohibited by the law,
in particular because of pressure from the European Union, although in 2003 in
the Czech Republic this meat and bone meal was fed to livestock. Sales of that
fertilizer are strictly regulated by the State and strictly veterinary
controlled. In the Czech Republic this fertilizer is sold in the minimum amount
of 50 kilograms for example by the company ASAP ltd. (see http://www.asap.cz/
), tel. 00420 569 408 111, 582 56 Věž No. 145, Havlíčkův Brod District,
Vysočina Region, Czech Republic, but only to registered farmers or
entrepreneurs with businesses justifying the sale of fertilizers.
Literature:
http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kafil%C3%A9rie
, http://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/kadaver.aspx : Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republc, POJMY Kadáver
, http://www.mechanizacezemedelstvi.cz/zivocisna-vyroba/Masokostni-moucka-z-kadaveru-zakazana__s45x12794.html : Helena Adamová
1.3 Potatoes
from symbiotic agriculture
Potatoes grown in symbiotic agriculture, which does not intervene against
their pests with the exception of their excessive reproduction. See Symbiotic
agriculture and experiments of natural science proving Philosophy of Balance on: http://www.spvzt.cz/symbioticagriculture.htm
.
…
2. The
statute of the association - introduction
THE ASSOCIATION FOR POSSIBLY THE MOST MERCIFUL PRODUCTS OF THE ECONOMY
(Czech: SPOLEK ZA CO MOŽNÁ
NEJMILOSRDNĚJŠÍ PRODUKTY EKONOMIKY,
Slovak: SPOLOK ZA ČO MOŽNÁ NAJMILOSRDNEJŠÍ PRODUKTY EKONOMIKY,
Spanish: ASOCIACIÓN PARA LOS
PRODUCTOS POSIBLEMENTE MÁS MISERICORDIOSOS DE ECONOMÍA,
French: ASSOCIATION POUR LES
PRODUITS LES PLUS MISÉRICORDIEUX POSSIBLEMENT DE L ' ÉCONOMIE,
Russian: Ассоциация
для по
возможности
наиболее милостивых
продуктов
экономики,
German: VEREINIGUNG FÜR
MÖGLICHERWEISE DIE BARMHERZIGSTEN PRODUKTE DER WIRTSCHAFT,
Italian: ASSOCIAZIONE PER I
PRODOTTI POSSIBILMENTE PIÙ MISERICORDIOSI DI ECONOMIA,
האגודה למוצרים
אולי הרחומים
ביותר של
הכלכלה: Hebrew)
Registration number (IČO):
60680784
(further
also as statute)
„All living
creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each
other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death
and pain."All the rest consists more in views (speculations).
„31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and,
behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day." The Bible, Genesis. 1,31
This is a way to
restore the world's paradise on Earth, the Jews, virtually Jewish cabbala would
say, to liberate the divine light, representing everything live from capture of
klippot, i.e. teguments of evil:
29
And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon
the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree
yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.30 And to every beast of the earth,
and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth,
wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
The Bible, Genesis 1,29-30
(Ten Commandments:) "Thou shalt not kill." The Bible, Exodus 20,13 and Deuteronomy 5,17 (citace viz Bible kralická):
In my opinion the
aim is the harmony of everyone and everything, this means of all living
creatures (all animals, plants, fungi, living cells, bacteria, viruses,
machines conscious of itself, etc.), in the future (by evolution) they could
become friends for life and death. In my opinion the paradise on Earth requires
us to kill other living creatures only when strictly necessary, not to kill
them too many, which is the only requirement for achieving a paradise on Earth.
I regard it
as a self-evident truth, that “Those who have the strongest desire to achieve a
world of universal love in the shortest possible time (i.e. to achieve paradise
for all living things) should inflict the minimum possible death and pain
(especially to all living creatures). Deciding, according to the “Philosophy of
Balance, whether it is fairer for a merciful animal or an equally merciful
human to die, represents an infinitely complex problem, which can only be
solved by nature, or God working through it. Our descendants should thus
continue in the education (i.e. evolution) of all living, often legally
irresponsible creatures, such as animals, in order to help them fulfill their
permanent obligation to inflict as little death and pain as possible.
...
3. The
statute of the association – rules for wining award of the most merciful products
Article 21
[Rights and duties of the
Commission] (1) The Commission is
authorized and required to decide to grant or to refuse or to withdraw the
designation of the appropriate economic product:
THE MOST MERCIFUL PRODUCTS …
or its translation into the
language of the territory in which the designation will be used, and on the
basis of proof or evidence that in each stage of production of the product for
this designation was not caused more unnecessary death and pain, i.e. almost
only the necessary death and pain have been caused, that is almost as small as
possible death and pain. A mayor is entitled to make the selection of economic
product and to suggest the designation from their own volition or on the
initiative of a third party. As already mentioned, the Commission proposes the
Mayor to remove or to appoint a Commissioner, it shall be entitled to inspect
all the economy of Association.
(2) The Commissioners shall be
required to comply with the Commission decision regarding the selected economic
product, to check the conditions for granting the above designation of economic
product, they are obliged to care for the reputation of the Association.
...
Full text of
the statute of above association in Czech in format:
htm
( http://www.spvzt.cz/stanovysdr.htm
) and pdf
( http://www.spvzt.cz/stanovysdr.pdf
).
© 2013-2016 applies to this entire article: Gain GRATIS trade designation
of rightness: "THE MOST MERCIFUL PRODUCTS."
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D., founder,
Tel. 00420 606302812
1) Seat:
Dobrovského 56/7,
693 01 Hustopeče (The house is not far from the central square, in which the
first Czechoslovak President T.G. Masaryk lived in the years 1861-1863) - MAP
Official hours:
after telephone arrangement
Tel. 00420 534 008
871, Tel. 00420 606 302 812
web site: www.spvzt.cz
e-mail: zakladatel@spvzt.cz
2) Cooperating
with Attorney, JUDr. Dalibor Grůzou Ph.D.:
Branch: Sv. Čecha
5, 693 01 Hustopeče- MAP
Tel. 00420 534 008
871, fax: 00420 519 413 392, cell phone 00420 606 302 812,
skype on line:
daliborgruza
web site: www.czechlawfirm.com
, e-mail: ak-gruza@seznam.cz
The World Food Program of the United Nations http://www.wfp.org/
Czech Committee for UNICEF of the United Nations http://www.unicef.cz/
Doctors Without Borders http://www.lekari-bez-hranic.cz/
The Salvation Army http://www.armadaspasy.cz/
Civil association: ohz-ochránci hospodářských zvířat (protectors of farm animals), o.s. http://www.ohz.cz/
Farma Krišnův dvůr (Farm Krishna court) http://www.krisnuvdvur.cz/
Society for the animals http://www.spolecnostprozvirata.cz/
Snakes http://www.chovamehady.cz/
Beasts http://www.selmy.cz/
Club of falconers of Czech-Moravian
hunting unity http://www.sokolnictvi.net/
Czech-Moravian
hunting unity http://www.cmmj.cz/
Natura 2000 http://www.nature.cz/natura2000-design3/hp.php
Flora Olomouc exhibition grounds, a.s. http://www.flora-ol.cz/
Trees in the Czech Republic - The association Quercus http://www.stromy.cz/
Philosophy
of Balance or ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY as biblical paradise in the world for
all living creatures by our own forces as commentary on Bible, Genesis, chapter
1-4
Genesis 1-4:26
King
James Version (KJV)
1
1 In the beginning
God created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth was without
form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of
God moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God said, Let there be light:
and there was light.
4 And God saw the light, that it
was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
5 And God called the light Day, and
the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first
day.
6 And God said, Let there be a
firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the
waters.
7 And God made the firmament, and
divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were
above the firmament: and it was so.
8 And God called the firmament Heaven.
And the evening and the morning were the second day.
9 And God said, Let the waters under
the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear:
and it was so.
10 And God called the dry land Earth;
and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it
was good.
11 And God said, Let the earth bring
forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after
his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
12 And the earth brought forth grass,
and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed
was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
13 And the evening and the morning were
the third day.
14 And God said, Let there be lights in
the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be
for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
15 And let them be for lights in the
firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
16 And God made two great lights; the
greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made
the stars also.
17 And God set them in the firmament of
the heaven to give light upon the earth,
18 And to rule over the day and over
the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was
good.
19 And the evening and the morning were
the fourth day.
20 And God said, Let the waters bring
forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly
above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.
21 And God created great whales, and
every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly,
after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was
good.
22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and
multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
23 And the evening and the morning were
the fifth day.
24 And God said, Let the earth bring
forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast
of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
25 And God made the beast of the earth
after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon
the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
26 And God said, Let us make man in
our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over
the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and
over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27 So God created man in his own
image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
28 And God blessed them, and God
said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue
it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air,
and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
29 And God said, Behold, I have
given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and
every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall
be for meat.
30 And to every beast of the earth,
and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth,
wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
31 And God saw every thing that he
had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning
were the sixth day.
2
1 Thus the
heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.
2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had
made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.
3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it:
because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.
4 These are the generations of the
heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens,
5 And every plant of the field before
it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man
to till the ground.
6 But there went up a mist from the
earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.
7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his
nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
8 And the Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he
had formed.
9 And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for
food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of
knowledge of good and evil.
10 And a river went out of Eden to
water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
11 The name of the first is Pison: that
is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold;
12 And the gold of that land is good:
there is bdellium and the onyx stone.
13 And the name of the second river is
Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia.
14 And the name of the third river is
Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river
is Euphrates.
15 And the Lord God took the man, and put him
into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying,
Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
17 But of the tree of the knowledge
of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest
thereof thou shalt surely die.
18 And the Lord God said, It is not good that
the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
19 And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the
field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he
would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the
name thereof.
20 And Adam gave names to all
cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for
Adam there was not found an help meet for him.
21 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall
upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh
instead thereof;
22 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he
a woman, and brought her unto the man.
23 And Adam said, This is now bone
of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was
taken out of Man.
24 Therefore shall a man leave his
father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one
flesh.
25 And they were both naked, the man
and his wife, and were not ashamed.
3
1 Now the serpent was more subtil
than any beast of the field which the Lord God had
made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every
tree of the garden?
2 And the woman said unto the
serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
3 But of the fruit of the tree
which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it,
neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
4 And the serpent said unto the
woman, Ye shall not surely die:
5 For God doth know that in the day
ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods,
knowing good and evil.
6 And when the woman saw that the
tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be
desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave
also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew
that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves
aprons.
8 And they heard the voice of the Lord God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and
Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God amongst the trees of the garden.
9 And the Lord God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?
10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I
was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.
11 And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast
thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?
12 And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be
with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.
13 And the Lord God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the
woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.
14 And the Lord God said unto the serpent,
Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every
beast of the field; upon
thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:
15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou
shalt bruise his heel.
16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy
sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy
desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened
unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded
thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in
sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee;
and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till
thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art,
and unto dust shalt thou return.
20 And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was
the mother of all living.
21 Unto Adam also and to his wife did the Lord God make coats
of skins, and clothed them.
22 And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is
become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his
hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
23 Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from
whence he was taken.
24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of
the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to
keep the way of the tree of life.
4
1 And Adam
knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.
2 And she again bare his brother
Abel. And Abel was a keeper (of sheep), but Cain was a tiller of the ground.
3 And in process of time it came to
pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord.
4 And Abel, he also
brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof.
And the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his
offering:
5 But unto Cain and to his offering he
had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.
6 And the Lord said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?
7 If thou doest well, shalt thou not
be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee
shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.
8 And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to
pass, when they were in the field, that Cain
rose up against Abel his
brother, and slew him.
9 And the Lord said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am
I my brother's keeper?
10 And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy
brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground.
11 And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath
opened her mouth to receive thy brother's blood from thy hand;
12 When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth
yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the
earth.
13 And Cain said unto the Lord, My punishment is greater than I can bear.
14 Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face
of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a
vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth
me shall slay me.
15 And the Lord said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be
taken on him sevenfold. And the Lord set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.
16 And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.
17 And Cain knew his wife; and she
conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the
city, after the name of his son, Enoch.
18 And unto Enoch was born Irad: and
Irad begat Mehujael: and Mehujael begat Methusael: and Methusael begat Lamech.
19 And Lamech took unto him two wives:
the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah.
20 And Adah bare Jabal: he was the
father of such as dwell in tents, and of such as have cattle.
21 And his brother's name was Jubal: he
was the father of all such as handle the harp and organ.
22 And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain,
an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain
was Naamah.
23 And Lamech said unto his wives, Adah
and Zillah, Hear my voice; ye wives of Lamech, hearken unto my speech: for I
have slain a man to my wounding, and a young man to my hurt.
24 If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold,
truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold.
25 And Adam knew his wife again; and she
bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me
another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew.
26 And to Seth, to him also there was
born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name
of the Lord.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%201:1-4:26&version=KJV