PARTY FOR THE RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING CREATURES (SPVT) - strategic documents
PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE
PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE OR ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore
|PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE
PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE, I.E. ORDER OF VICTORIOUS ARMY:
„All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain.“ All the rest consists more in views (speculations) (i.e. which consists possibly also more in view /speculation/).
07/07/2018 Theory of evolution according to Philosophy of Balance denies Darwinian species competitive struggle for life and seeks to do reconciliation of predators and their prey, thus especially of carnivorous animals and herbivores in this world, as it was allegedly in Biblical paradise.
One man said me, that he thought about my Philosophy of Balance, but that human being is predator and they are at top of food chain. That he has five children and he wants, that they have what to eat and they have healthy bones. That his family does not eat a lot of meat. If by him bred animals have short but happy life and they are slaughtered by means of kosher slaughter, thus by means of cut of jugular artery, thus nearly without pain, so his family has no sin. Sin is animal in agriculture factory farm of animals. That only this one has right for life, who struggles for it (i.e. truth is relative, truth has, who can enforce it, the favor of fate is impossible to influence and it is only possible to exploit). That it is concerned with natural balance. That if lions do not eat antelopes, so antelopes reproduce excessively and they will die of starvation anyway. It is concerned with Darwinian theory of evolution or orthodox Judaism, that it is given so in nature and it is not possible to change it.
About it I said him ironically, that he is total vegetarian and that animals are with him as in Biblical paradise. Then already seriously I said him, that, although evolution is apparently sure, so Darwinian theory of evolution is one of many theories of evolution and that already at its origin other theories of evolution, e.g. Lamarckism existed. That theory of evolution according to Philosophy of Balance denies Darwinian species competitive struggle for life and seeks to do reconciliation of predators and their prey, thus especially of carnivorous animals and herbivores in this world, as it was allegedly in Biblical paradise. I am compelled to do personal life experiment, that according to Philosophy of Balance this one has right for life, who lives what maybe at the most in peace with his or her surroundings, i. e. especially both with his or her predators and with his or her prey, however his or her struggle for life is only second - rate (I am trying to ensure me the favor of fate by reciprocal help and friendship instead of struggle for life, it is only my weakness according to Darwinism, see Christianity as religion of in fact predatory prey).
This is based on my scientific hypothesis that according to the Philosophy of Balance, living microorganisms, especially living cells, are capable of distinguishing and remembering whether we protect them, especially by feeding them, or whether we kill them. Therefore, even these living microorganisms, according to the Philosophy of Balance, are able through basic mental reflections to distinguish between and remember their friend or enemy. It could be said, that they possess a soul in the religious sense of the term. An adversarial living microorganism is then treated as an enemy by not only these living organisms but also by their affiliated or related microorganisms, which devour it. In our macro-world, this tends to manifest as quarrel, illness, pain, war, injury, disaster, failure, death, etc. A friendly living organism, according to the Philosophy of Balance, is then treated in an amicable manner by these living microorganisms, or, more precisely, it is not devoured by them. On the contrary, they devour such living microorganisms that attempt to devour the amicable one. The friendly behaviour of the microorganisms manifests itself in the macro-world as the peaceful and long life of me and my offspring or as a series of friends and comrades who are willing to fight and sacrifice their lives for us.
12/10/2018 Only one for human being lifelong acceptable main formal rule: Do not do your hateful to another. Rabbi Hillel or Jesus from Nazareth vs. rabbi Shammai. (Talmud, Shabbat 31a, Bible, Tob 4,15, Bible, Lk 6,31, Mt 7,12, Koran 83:1-6)
Counterargument ot the above - mentioned main (golden) formal rule is such, that in spite of reasonable and emotional somebody's (e.g. my) personal life experience according to reasonable and emotional general experience in nature the strong predators in the broadest sense do not mostly repay good with good and evil with evil, i.e. they very often cause much more than the least possible death and pain, because they do not (allegedly in fact) mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other.
Counterargument of that counterargument is in wording of contemporary prevalent Darwinian theory of Richard Dawkins in his writing The Selfish Gene, that according to my Philosophy of Balance the evolution of nature is based in a majority on altruistic respectively selfish reciprocity not on exclusive selfishness e.g. of genes, how both Darwinism and Dawkins suppose, only nature will be able to do the indirect proof of this dispute between Darwinism and my Philosophy of Balance, if from long - term viewpoint the selfishness of human beings in relation to other living creatures also to people is profitable, or on the contrary, if nature revenges this selfishness reciprocally, according to my Philosophy of Balance this direct proof is in by us influenceable time nevertheless automatic establishment of Biblical paradise, i. e. world, where everyone likes each other.
While the least possible death and pain is absolute value, so only lower limit of much more than the least possible death and pain (especially in relation to females as donors of life) as subjectively relative value of little more than the least possible death and pain as apparent component of that absolute value should be subjectively tolerated without appropriate counterattack, however intentional killing of human being or animal is absolutely inadmissible except extreme need.
1) for repeal of EU prohibition of sale of healthy guaranteed carrions in mainstream shops, that also pregnant and breastfeeding women and little children need not to eat slaughtered animals
2) ideally for the adoption and draft of the LAW ON THE SLAUGHTER TAX
Petition (see below) for in mainstream shops sale of naturally on principle of old age dead animals (virtually bodies of these animals) (e.g . after veterinary autopsy and for people boiled in several waters, see HERE ) as the contemporary as much as possible merciful meat in spite of on the present in European Union valid prohibition (it would be primarily only supplemental, from long - term aspects in the end ideally exclusive its sale, this meat has already been eaten in ancient times*), because pregnant and breastfeeding women and little children must eat meat, which especially interests and laws of different powerful lobby groups obstruct**.
By me suggested possible slaughter tax (see below petition) radically restricts the consumption of products from slaughtered animals and radically disadvantages agriculture factory farms for slaughter - concentration camps of animals, where farm animals are on principle tortured from their birth (e.g. within monstrous genetic experiments, during which mad scientists analogical as Nazi war criminal against humanity Josef Mengele inbred e.g. chicken broilers /in Czech Republic with 10 million inhabitants there is ca. half of one million murdered broilers daily***/, or e.g. free movement of farm animals is limited here in very little space from their birth, that through their movement they do not lose their gained weight, they are fed so that after their birth they gain what maybe fastest slaughter weight) and shortly, i.e. at the latest in a few months after their birth they are also cruelly killed, i.e. slaughtered in slaughter - houses after this their from birth big suffering caused in this way by a human, as opposed to the organic animal breeds also for the slaughter with the ultimate aim of breeding all livestock until their natural death, on principle of the old age and consumption of so obtained naturally dead carrions of animals (after the autopsy of the veterinarian and for people on principle boiled in several waters) instead of slaughtered animals and for help to people in extreme need.
13/08/2018 Two possibilities of crisis progress in contemporary world
People has such government, what it will merit, the democracy with enactment of fair rights of all living creatures on the present especially of animals (politeia) is the best, on second place the dictatorship with this enactment is the best, on third place the democracy without this enactment is the best and the dictatorship without this enactment (tyranny) is the worst. Widespread scientific hypothesis exists, that in the Universe there is so little life, because, if some civilization does not overcome the above - mentioned selfish approach to the world, so in a certain (radio or spaceflight technology) phase of its evolution it will destroy and will exterminate itself. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_paradox .
During contemporary worldwide human consumer welfare the enactment of slaughter tax and of sale of animals naturally dead on principle of old age in mainstream shops are apparently mere utopia, on the present apparently individual human being can mostly help the massively most tortured imprisoned farm animals on principle only on own garden and otherwise too little. According to my Philosophy of Balance two possibilities will be:
1) Worse possibility with probability ca. 49% is, that karma (acts) of mankind is already so burdened by caused huge unnecessary death and pain especially of farm and also of other animals but also of people, that the enactment of slaughter tax and of sale of animals naturally dead on principle of old age in mainstream shops will not be and as fatal revenge the worldwide extreme crisis, when e.g. nuclear wars are, e.g. by reason of world migration or economical crisis, Nazi dictatorships or climatic changes (Biblical apocalypse), will break out****. Pregnant and breastfeeding women and little children necessarily need to eat meat, till this time having children means to assume responsibility for murders of animals. In this case weaker (prey) righteous human being, who cannot cause with his or her children from their birth not much more than the least possible death and pain, especially eat from meat on principle only carrions dead by natural death on principle of old age, to escape punishment of death and pain, should die childless nearly without physical and mental pain after happy, long and dignified life.
2) Better possibility with probability ca. 51% is, that some State will enact slaughter tax and sale of naturally on principle of old age dead farm animals (e.g. after veterinary autopsy and boiled in several waters) in its mainstream shops also for pregnant and breastfeeding women and little children in sufficient advancing to prevent fatal revenge for caused injustice to the massively most tortured imprisoned farm animals, and so thanks to by me supposed from long - term viewpoint most powerful law of this world in form of charity it will escape this Biblical apocalypse and the exodus, i.e. coming out from slavery of its animals possibly also of its humans (see above mentioned politeia) will apparently wait it. Pregnant and breastfeeding women and little children necessarily need to eat meat. In this case wesker (prey) righteous human being should not die childless.
* Bible, King James Version, Deuteronomy 14,21 Ye shall not eat of any thing that dieth of itself thou shalt give it unto the stranger that is in thy gates that he may eat it; or thou mayest sell it unto an alien for thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother's milk. Koran, /CXII/ Sura 5, Prepared Table, verse 4/3: Koran, /LXXXVII/ Sura 6, Cattle, verse 145/146: Orthodox Muslims cannot eat voluntarily carrions. (It means. when in the end in some State in Western world from animal bodies only carrions are permissible to eat, so all orthodox Muslims of this State and also all orthodox Jews of this State will become completely integrated unorthodox Muslims and also completely integrated unorthodox Jews.)
Basic Judaism prayer Shema Yisrael literally "Hear, O Israel" reads:
Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart: And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up. And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes. And thou shalt write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates. (Bible, Deuteronomy 6, 4-9)
And it shall come to pass, if ye shall hearken diligently unto my commandments which I command you this day, to love the LORD your God, and to serve him with all your heart and with all your soul, That I will give you the rain of your land in his due season, the first rain and the latter rain, that thou mayest gather in thy corn, and thy wine, and thine oil. And I will send grass in thy fields for thy cattle, that thou mayest eat and be full. Take heed to yourselves, that your heart be not deceived, and ye turn aside, and serve other gods, and worship them; And then the LORD's wrath be kindled against you, and he shut up the heaven, that there be no rain, and that the land yield not her fruit; and lest ye perish quickly from off the good land which the LORD giveth you. Therefore shall ye lay up these my words in your heart and in your soul, and bind them for a sign upon your hand, that they may be as frontlets between your eyes. And ye shall teach them your children, speaking of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, when thou liest down, and when thou risest up. And thou shalt write them upon the door posts of thine house, and upon thy gates: That your days may be multiplied, and the days of your children, in the land which the LORD sware unto your fathers to give them, as the days of heaven upon the earth. (Bible, Deuteronomy 11, 13-21)
And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, and bid them that they make them fringes in the borders of their garments throughout their generations, and that they put upon the fringe of the borders a ribband of blue: And it shall be unto you for a fringe, that ye may look upon it, and remember all the commandments of the LORD, and do them ; and that ye seek not after your own heart and your own eyes, after which ye use to go a whoring: That ye may remember, and do all my commandments, and be holy unto your God. I am the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, to be your God: I am the LORD your God. (Bible, Numbers 15, 37-41)
Shema Yisrael see Bible King James Version, http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%A0ema_Jisra%27el , https://www.biblegateway.com/
Now to interpretation "Hear, O Israel" from the perspective of Philosophy of Balance:
From "Hear, O Israel" it stems. "So make sure, that your heart could not be deceived by straying that it listens to other gods and serves them. Understand: the straying from the consciousness, that God is one, only one and containing all his work. Everything is with all connected, because Eternity" (i.e. God) "is everything - containing, the Eternity is One." Love for omnipresent God means love for all living creatures.
Benjamin Kuras, Zakázané ovoce vědění, Bible jako drama a terapie, G plus G, s.r.o., Prague 2003, p. 190 et seq. and p. 216 et seq.
Bible Deuteronomy 28,58-69
58 If thou wilt not observe to do all the words of this law that are written in this book, that thou mayest fear this glorious and fearful name, The Lord Thy God; 59 Then the Lord will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance. 60 Moreover he will bring upon thee all the diseases of Egypt, which thou wast afraid of; and they shall cleave unto thee. 61 Also every sickness, and every plague, which is not written in the book of this law, them will the Lord bring upon thee, until thou be destroyed. 62 And ye shall be left few in number, whereas ye were as the stars of heaven for multitude; because thou wouldest not obey the voice of the Lord thy God. 63 And it shall come to pass, that as the Lord rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the Lord will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it. 64 And the Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone. 65 And among these nations shalt thou find no ease, neither shall the sole of thy foot have rest: but the Lord shall give thee there a trembling heart, and failing of eyes, and sorrow of mind: 66 And thy life shall hang in doubt before thee; and thou shalt fear day and night, and shalt have none assurance of thy life: 67 In the morning thou shalt say, Would God it were even! and at even thou shalt say, Would God it were morning! for the fear of thine heart wherewith thou shalt fear, and for the sight of thine eyes which thou shalt see. 68 And the Lord shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you. 69[29,1] These are the words of the covenant which he made with them in Horeb.
Bible, New Testament, Mark 16, 15 And he said unto them (Jesus from Nazareth, apparently Christ and God man, my note):, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. 16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. (According to some significant manuscript monuments Mark gospel does not contain this verse. However verses 9 - 20 many other manuscripts incorporate. Some manuscripts have behind verse 8 other ending.) (see King James Version /KJV/ translation of Bible on https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+16&version=KJV and Czech ecumenical translation of Bible, Czech biblical society 1995, page 58-59)
**** " ... nor has wickedness become widespread without ... sending calamity." (see Sirat Rasoul Allah, The Life of Muhammad, Apostle of Allah, Ibn Ishag 704-767 anno Domini, from English publication by Michael Edwardes, published by Royal Asiatic Society of London in year 1898, chapter Last illness on: https://archive.org/stream/Sirat-lifeOfMuhammadBy-ibnIshaq/SiratIbnIahaqInEnglish_djvu.txt ).
** My philosophical intolerant
approach is oriented only against religious fanaticism of not -
orthodox Judaism and of not - charitable orthodox Islam, when they
forbid their believers to eat carrions (see facebook below) also
sanitated (e.g. after veterinary autopsy and boiled in several waters)
as the contemporary existing possible most merciful meat and
so these not - charitable orthodox religious sections prolong inhuman
unnecessary huge death and pain of on a mass scale enslaved living
At the same time I know that both charitable and not - charitable parts of the Jewish nation form and always formed one family of the Jewish nation and both charitable and not - charitable parts of the Arabic nation form and always formed one family of the Arabic nation.
If you are citizen of the Czech Republic, please sign the Petition for the formation of political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures, that all living creatures have in our society just rights recognized under state law. This can be done on http://www.spvzt.cz/Peticezavznikstrany.html . (* Signature for the Petition does not mean the emergence of party membership.)
The ultimate aim of the activity of the political Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures is the establishment of peace among all living creatures, inter alia between carnivores and herbivores, herbivores and plants. to achieve the ideal of paradise, in a world by their own power of the people and all living creatures in their life. This goal represents the task reachable only with the progress of science, or with the continuing evolution of nature in an endless time, and inter alia it will eventually require a ban on any intentional killing of all animals, especially animals and plants and fungi by any person for the purpose of consumption and the consumption only of the bodies of living creatures, in particular animals deceased at this ban, in principle, only of old age.
We cannot want from others' welfare in childhood, middle age and old, and to kill unnecessarily other living creatures for our convenience or taste resulting in a contradiction or conflict of conscience in the brain of an individual, especially of a human and according to the Philosophy of Balance it is the root cause of all wars, murders, diseases, immoral behavior and of other cruelty and mercilessness in the society of living creatures.
Reason to the Philosophy of Balance and to the law on the slaughter tax
According to the majority opinion the human is the supreme predator in nature, and therefore he or she has the right to kill other living creatures, in particular I mean the animals, insects and plants or fungi, and even though perhaps the human does not like it nor he or she admits it publicly, the human must respect the fact, that in nature strong, often unmerciful predators govern and the human as the supreme predator must arrange also his or her life according to it. Human does not need allegedly care about the good of all creation, but just for the good of his or her own pack also at the expense of great death and pain of other packs of living creatures, the human can allegedly approve and cause much more than the least possible death and pain. Thus the human has allegedly the right to be also unmerciful. This is partly proved by the historical tradition of humanity and by nature observations, especially by the Darwinian evolution theory, although exact science has not provided the perfect exact scientific proof of this up to now.
Conversely according to the Philosophy of Balance in nature is valid the law of the exclusive harmony, i.e. symbiosis, i.e. the in long term most powerful law of love (defined in an obvious way in my Philosophy of Balance, that "All living creatures in fact mostly want to live in a world, where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is still obliged to cause the least possible death and pain. All the rest consists more in views (speculations).). This is based on my scientific hypothesis that according to the Philosophy of Balance, living microorganisms, especially living cells, are capable of distinguishing and remembering whether we protect them, especially by feeding them, or whether we kill them. Therefore, even these living microorganisms, according to the Philosophy of Balance, are able through basic mental reflections to distinguish between and remember their friend or enemy. It could be said, that they possess a soul in the religious sense of the term. An adversarial living microorganism is then treated as an enemy by not only these living organisms but also by their affiliated or related microorganisms, which devour it. In our macro-world, this tends to manifest as quarrel, illness, pain, war, injury, disaster, failure, death, etc. A friendly living organism, according to the Philosophy of Balance, is then treated in an amicable manner by these living microorganisms, or, more precisely, it is not devoured by them. On the contrary, they devour such living microorganisms that attempt to devour the amicable one. The friendly behaviour of the microorganisms manifests itself in the macro-world as the peaceful and long life of me and my offspring or as a series of friends and comrades who are willing to fight and sacrifice their lives for us. In my Philosophy of Balance I am also trying to find exact natural science proofs for this hypothesis.
If my Philosophy of Balance is valid, then every living creature in nature and also the human as the supreme predator in nature are paid off in long term to be still as little as possible predator, i.e. to cause still the least possible death and pain, or at least still not to cause much more than the least possible death and pain. If the human society wishes to humanize further, then it can be assumed that in the future the enactment of by me proposed slaughter tax happens most certainly, unless human society humanizes further, then this will apparently not happen.
The main in everyday life practical biblical question: Is nature unmerciful or the biblical paradise for all alive can be achieved in it by own forces of living creatures?
LAW ON THE SLAUGHTER TAX
The practical functioning of the slaughter tax will be based on the finances. At least half of the revenue of the slaughter tax, will be by this Act specifically intended to subsidies to farmers and to the transition and to maintain their agricultural production on animal breeding until their natural death, for the production of the products from sanitary treated and safe bodies of naturally dead animals, including food, in particular meat. The following products from naturally dead animals will continue to benefit from the fact that they will not be the subject of the slaughter tax, compared to products from slaughtered animals. The moral aspect will also work as the prevention of reduction of the slaughter tax, because payment of the slaughter tax will be so a sort of indulgence of the people, that they are complicit with intentional killing of an animal. Among other things, one tenth rate of the slaughter tax for goods from organic farms, because they are more merciful, and further exclusion, where appropriate, or exemption from slaughter tax of the family home breeds of livestock also for the purpose of slaughter of 133 kilograms of body weight of the animal for a member of the household and a year, because those members of home breeds have towards bred animals fundamentally personal relationship on the basis of personal care for farm animals as family members, as opposed to the agricultural factory farms of animals for the purpose of slaughter, causing the worst suffering of the animals. The same tax rate for organic farming and livestock delivered to the home family farms has to prioritize the education of these farm animals from the baby, when at the time of taxation at the time of the supply of this animal to the home breed this animal has a minimum mass than an adult animal. At least half of the revenue of the slaughter tax will be also by the Act on the slaughter tax tied purposely for subsidies to organic agricultural also slaughter breeds. The second most half of the tax will be also by the Act on the slaughter tax tied purposely to help people in extreme need in our country and in the world.
Officials of the Party for the Rights of All Living Creatures will have to be members of the Society of Friends, i.e. friends of all living creatures and to comply with the eternal obligation of all living creatures, otherwise they lose their office without further.
Eternal duty of all living creatures
(1) Fundamental duty of all living creatures is to cause the least possible death and pain. The perfect living creature eats then only plant fruits and plant seeds from all living creatures. (Further also eternal duty of members).
(2) Any change of this eternal duty of all living creatures, who are members of this association (further also members), is inadmissible. In the event of any change or nullification of this eternal duty of members the extinction of association occurs automatically.
(3) By the interpretation of these articles it is impossible to entitle any elimination or threat of this eternal duty of members.
(4) Member has right also to eat only gradually in extreme emergency (especially from serious health reasons) eggs, in extreme emergency carrions of living creatures died of natural causes, on principle of old age, or in extreme emergency collected blood of non-slaughtered animals and humans and milk, or in extreme emergency plants, all always the most mercifully as possible bred and killed, and products purely from them.Up